TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Relationship1599 Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by Ok_Relationship1599 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://youtu.be/ZxT9k3kPoz8?si=RnWYLS-7FgMsdOA7 Okay, and Demetrius Johnson (one of the greatest) says he’s elite. I guess we’re both wrong🤷🏾‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:50 PM
2

Nobodies made excuses. You just don’t understand the definition of professional.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:45 PM
2

Ok cool, so you have no problem with any women claiming they are professional models on social media. All so T8 can be a “pro” No, I have no problem with it because that’s the definition of “pro” Has nothing to do with Tate himself. Your incessant whining isn’t making the point you think it is. All you’ve proven is that you don’t understand anything about professional sports of any kind. “Pro” encompasses any and all people who are getting paid to do their sport. “Elite” are the best of the best…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:35 PM
1

“I’m telling you she’s a model. She got paid to get her pictures taken. Sure “Ted’s tits” isn’t the level of Onlyfans or even cosmo, but if she got paid she’s a model. Ok so what if she’s ugly. She gets paid to get her pics taken. That’s a model!” Yes, that’s quite literally how it works. I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. That sounds pretty stupid, right? Not really. There are a lot of women who get paid to pose in largely unknown niche magazines. Women get paid to model on OF and I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:11 PM
1

I’m literally subscribed to eyepatchwolf you 🤡. You also continently ignored the numerous times I’ve said “he’s not at the level of Izzy, Perreria or Cro Cop” because you keep whining about being a Tate defender. No, I’m not under the impression that he’s some elite world level class kickboxer. I am under the impression he fought in lower C-D tier kickboxing organizations and won their organizations “world championship”. Enfusion/ISKA are legitimate, just not elite. It’s a world title, but not o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 04:39 PM
0

An apologist would praise Tate as an elite kickboxer which I haven’t done. There are countless “professionals” in all sports. But unless you’re in the premier league of your sport, you’re not elite. You seem to have quite a difficult time comprehending the difference between “low level professional” and “elite”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 04:22 PM
0

You realize money is the only thing that separates pro and amateur level right? If you make money from fighting, it’s considered pro. You clearly don’t know much about fighting so continuing on with you is a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 04:04 PM
1

It think in it’s better to look at it like a sport like fighting No one in kick boxing considers it a “professional organization” It’s at best pro/am When you get paid for fights it’s pro. Low level pro, but pro none the less And what happened when he did try fighting in professional promotions? Enfusion is a pro organization, so is ISKA. ONE, PFL, Bellator, Pride are all pro MMA organizations. They’re not on the same level as the UFC, however, they’re still “pro” by definition And again you did…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:02 PM
2

I’ve seen that guys video already multiple times. I’m not disagreeing with his overall point it’s just not a “lie” per se. Think of a sport like hockey. There are thousands of professional hockey players who’ve won the league championship multiple times over. However, if they’re not playing in the NHL and winning the Stanley Cup it’s a lot less impressive than it originally sounds. They’re still legitimate players and legitimate champions, just not elite. The same applies to Andrew Tate. He’s a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:44 PM
2

His career isn’t a “lie” necessarily. He’s not lying when he says he’s a 4x kickboxing world champion. But for people who don’t understand anything about fighting there’s a lot of context missing. He’s a good fighter, but nowhere near the level of Cro Cop, Perriera, Rodtang, or Adesanya.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:28 PM
–

That was kind of my point. Some men are assholes, some women are assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 02:42 PM
–

For the same reason women tend to be mean to short men, broke men, or men with small 🍆.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 12:41 PM
2

Who said my panties were in a twist? You asked a question, I answered the question. My apologies for trying to provide insight for a question you asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:56 PM
3

I guess that depends on how you want to define “accessible”. Will those men at the top marry and commit to women outside their sphere? Highly unlikely. Will those men sleep with (and potentially impregnate) women outside their sphere? Yes, absolutely. The Jackson 5, (aside from Michael) slept with groupies in the 60’s and 70’s all the time. They likely never saw those women again, but those women did have access to the Jackson 5 for at least a night. If the man’s not careful, 1 night becomes 18 …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:43 PM
5

Think of the following: Rich men CEO’s Politicians That’s who “men on the top” is referring to in this instance. It’s men who have huge bank accounts and/or men with high social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:32 PM
1

Dating has never been “fair”. Dating, relationships, marriage, etc. None of it is fair. In order to be successful in any of those dynamics there needs to be mutual attraction between both parties involved. When it comes to sexual attraction, there is nothing rational, moral, logical, or fair about it. People are going to want what they want regardless of whether or not the subject of their attraction is a well put together. That’s why you have so many frustrated “nice guys”. It’s not because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:15 PM
2

The nuanced takes include the reasons why men feel abandoned or led astray by mainstream advice. Thats my whole point. Until people understand the why behind the what the conversation won’t go anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 10:37 AM
0

Perhaps, truthfully I don’t think it’d make much a difference to be honest. Like my OG comment said, a lot of the viewers don’t actually understand WHY these influencers are able to draw guys into the manosphere. Until people understand the WHY behind the manosphere any nuanced conversation about the topic is DOA.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:30 AM
1

I don’t quite get what you mean. Most of the reactions to the documentary seem to be that the manosphere is no good and that young men/boys need to find new and or better people to be influenced by.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 08:03 AM
13

It was okay. Louis didn’t really say anything about the manosphere that hadn’t already been said. What I think it failed to address and what casual audiences fail to understand is WHY these guys are able to cultivate a following in the first place. You can’t get rid of the manosphere if you don’t understand why it exists in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:19 AM
2

Not really, a genuine relationship requires depth, connection, and vulnerability. A lot of red pill influencers discourage men from doing any of that. -Myron Gaines has routinely said he’d never live with his wife and children full time. -Justin Waller has said the only way he’d take a woman out for dinner would be as a plus 1 to a business dinner he was having with other men. Shit like that is just neglectful towards your wife, women whose emotional needs aren’t being met are the ones who go an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 11:28 PM
0

Not really, blue pill has its own dogma just like the red pill and black pill have theirs. Blue Pill-“Just world fallacy” Be a good person and everything will fall in place eventually. Red Pill-“Society lied to you” You weren’t told the truth about the world and by following the RP you’ll learn the truth. Black pill-“Nihilism”-I’m doomed and nothing I can do will matter Again, none of these concepts are new or revolutionary, attaching pills to the concepts is just a way to simplify them. I’m sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 05:27 PM
2

The blue pill doesn’t exist. Of course it doesn’t, all these “pills” are just easy labels to slap on societal trends and concepts. Something like the black pill is literally just nihilism. It’s made up entirely by red pilled dudes so that they have something to contrast their bullshit. The red pilled can hardly ever be upheld on its own, that’s why red pilled dudes spend so much time making shit up about the blue pill All pills are made up. One day we’ll probably have a crayola box worth of pill…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:25 PM
3

The straw man is truly insane. Nobody’s strawmannining. The blue pill is just stupid in its messaging😂 "Looks don't matter"?? Dude nobody thinks that. Nobody who’s honest thinks that. I’ve heard that line from countless women over the years and I still hear some of em repeat it to this day. BP emphasizes having a good personality because we're talking to resentful horny guys. For them, working on their personality is extremely beneficial. Yes, but even if those men change their personalities it’…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:55 PM
-1

Bullshit. Yes, like the redpill, the blue pill is largely bullshit. The blue pill is the only pill willing to call these sexless red pilled dudes exactly what they are.. ugly Your point being? That doesn’t negate anything that I said. It’s those dudes that hate it the most and reject it the hardest because to do that would mean they accept that they’re ugly and will never attract women that are attractive. I think they reject it because they know it’s largely feel good bullshit that won’t actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:42 PM
0

It can, and it does. Believe me, I know from experience. But get laid and having a meaningful relationship that lasts decades are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:33 PM
3

Blue pill doesn't "believe" in a just world fallacy. Yes it does, which is why it places such an emphasis on “personality” and being “kind”. It operates under the premise that your character is what makes or breaks your chances and that couldn’t be any further from the truth. Good men can struggle with women. Bad men can attract large swaths of women. If character was really all that mattered bad people would never find relationships. Everybody knows that a woman generally isn't going to fall fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:31 PM
0

You’re right, but I will say all these different “pills” are just quick and easy ways to label and identify trends tbh. The red and blue pill are largely foolishness but they both have minuscule degrees of merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:01 PM
1

Not really, the biggest flaw is that it operates under the “just world” fallacy. Be kind, be sweet, have a good personality etc. The problem is that it doesn’t take into account sexual attraction. Attraction is not moral, logical, rational, or fair. In the absence of sexual attraction, your personality won’t matter the least bit to a woman. That doesn’t mean your personality is of 0 importance, if you want a happy long term relationship you should be with someone that you like as a human being, …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:54 PM
0

You’re not wrong about your description of the blue pill, but red pill shit ain’t gonna work out for you long term. If you wanna fuck a bunch of different women the rest of your life then go for it. But if you want an actual meaningful relationship with a single woman the red pill ain’t gonna help you. At all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:42 PM
4

Two things can be true at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 06:38 PM
9

Yep, that’s why I don’t do the whole “friends to lovers thing”. If I’m interested in a woman, I’ll let it be known. If she reciprocates interest, we move forward, if not, I cut my losses and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:10 PM
2

Generally speaking, no. Women are more likely to contract STDs, they’re less likely to orgasm, and they’re the ones that actually have to carry the baby should pregnancy occur. Most women aren’t going to take the chance of contracting an std, not finishing, and being impregnated by a guy they may never see or talk to again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 03:17 PM
2

Think of it this way. Sex carry’s a much bigger risk for women than it does for men. Simply put, in most cases the risk of sleeping with a guy far outweighs whatever potential reward if there’s any to begin with. For men, sex with women is relatively low risk and the reward is far greater.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 03:11 PM
2

Yes, I find most women attractive in one way or another. There are very few women I’d consider “ugly” so to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 02:50 PM
2

Nobody values what there’s an abundance of.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 02:46 PM
1

Different hormonal cycles in addition to an abundance of sexual opportunities. Typically, we place lower value on what there’s an abundance of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:35 PM
1

Depends on how well you take care of yourself. If a woman takes care of herself she can look good well into her 50’s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:38 PM
2

No, if a woman doesn’t want kids why maker her? Better to not be a mother than to be a shitty mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:01 PM
3

I still don’t see what’s selfish about spending money on yourself over a wife and kids you don’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 07:33 PM
7

If you rather SPEND MONEY ON YOURSELF instead of your family and kids… that’s selfish Agreed, but if you have no family and no kids to support, what makes that selfish?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 04:28 PM
–

My thoughts exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 01:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter