TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Seesaw_8226 Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Ok_Seesaw_8226 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Rape and abuse, according to the statistics, are enacted by people you know, not stranger dangers. Take accountability by assessing the guy you are dating after 3 dates. You don’t need a defamation app for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:45 PM
1

That’s precisely my point. Most incels are NOT hateful. This is just disinformation and propaganda. If they can’t have sex at least let them have their chip on their shoulder. As long as they don’t harm anyone else I think compassionately allowing them to wallow may be therapeutic instead of constantly trying to oppress them to the gynocentre. There is a lecture by Bzezek where he explains how the new postmodernist parenting is way more oppressive than the old school parents who bark at you orde…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:47 PM
1

I don’t think these are the same men. Incels are some of the most gentle, shy, and liberal people. The “bad men” Gillette is talking about are chads who score with women. Many studies show that actually misogyny is highly correlated with sexual success. Stop fucking attacking the incels. Normalize it and make it into a word of compassion rather than a slur.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:22 PM
1

But they aren’t being assholes. They are merely acting as anyone would if they were constantly attacked for not being good enough (as if they’re not being good enough is not punishment enough). Stop with the fucking adolescence. Stop with the fucking toxic masculinity. I remind you, first there was Gillette ads, only then Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:11 PM
1

Your solution sounds draconian. Let men be who they are. Cannot force them to love used up hoes just as you can’t force them to be gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:03 PM
1

There is a top down solution though. Stop with the fucking constant attack against men and masculinity, stop gaslighting that women are somehow disenfranchised in large scale media outlets and in public policy, and normalize male suffering from sexual starvation instead of mocking it and making it pathological (“haha what an incel”). Moreover their plight of tension between their evolutionary needs (to mate with a pure woman) and reality (they never will) should not be seen as a point of failure…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:26 PM
2

She will not love him because her nature is to select those who are attractive, which is by definition those who can pull. He will not love her because when his life long sexual starvation encounters her “oh sex means nothing. Anyone can have it. It was a million years ago when I did those things and it meant nothing.” It will experience a form of cognitive dissonance. The only resolution out of it is that he is not worthy of her. This will kill his love.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:08 AM
3

It’s like resenting autists because they resist personal growth. The fact of the matter it is inherently human to feel alienated by someone who had such a vastly different lived experience than you. If the very absence you focused your attention on for the majority of your life they just had as over satiation. Shame on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:03 AM
4

This is profoundly unkind of the level of antihumanism. If you were a novelist I would not want you to write me in as a character.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:53 PM
1

What are temporal preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:27 PM
3

That’s precisely my point: he had a (sexually) interesting life. Most men don’t. Most women can. Let me put it like this: if he is the kind of guy who could get two girls to give him a dream job then he would be WAY less likely to care that you got spit roasted by two guys. But then, the kind of guy who can do that will only want to get into a LTR with a woman who is highly attractive, because he has a lot of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:08 PM
1

Maybe you’re more attractive than you imagined. If you were able to secure a healthy stable years long relationship from a guy who was not sexually starved and who could pull good numbers then you are probably sufficiently attractive. Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:59 PM
2

Yes I agree with you, they will not let go and they’ll go fuck themselves. This is what you see happening en masse. That was the whole point of the OP. To Somehow pretend like this is a nonissue is disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:46 PM
4

Not sure why you see it this way. If you like casual sex then great do it and enjoy. You’ll find plenty of takers. No damning necessary. If you want relationships then unless you’re very attractive maybe be a bit modest with the hookups since you’ll most likely manage to get a LTR from a man who was starved most of his life and then the imbalance will hurt your relationship. Again, if you’re consisted not damning necessary. The damning comes into the picture when you change your strategy mid gam…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:44 PM
7

Entitled? No. Nobody is entitled to anything. But comparing this to employment is deeply flawed since capital owners always have the upper hand on the working force in the market. OTOH women shall always have the upper hand in the sexual arena. At any rate regardless of entitlement there will be no love between a millionaire and a beggar, and there will be no love between a woman who has been flooded with attention since she was 12 and who had to turn down male advances essentially every day of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:13 PM
4

You can only be picky when you’re not starving.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:08 PM
9

Not quite. It’s more like, you were born homeless who always had to fend for scraps of food, and then one day you are supposed to partner up with someone who spent most of their lives being a millionaire but is now slowly realizing they don’t believe in capitalism so they want to try to slim it with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:34 PM
3

Because often its not “more than”, its “less than”. It’s like “he gave me butterflies so i just had to” versus “I met him three times, i really wasn’t sure, but everything in life pointed to me having to give him a chance if i wanted finally something real. So I did and I gradually learnt to love him, and yes, the sex is not as exciting as I had in my past but I appreciate the bond we have.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:30 PM
–

Perhaps it is time we disengage then. Look, not everything has to be spelled out elaborately and explicitly so that you can come in and debate it. This is useless. Sometimes throwing around a few hints and seeing what sparks inspiration is more productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:23 PM
–

I don't see why you need to kill a sentient being to survive? Millions of vegetarians lead long successful lives. Yet somehow nobody is asking how come we justify killing sentient beings for this reason and hide behind "need to survive". The fact of the matter is we are happy to let other people suffer if we can, if it means we can fulfill certain needs, even not fulfilling those needs will not lead to death. I just wanted to point this out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:14 PM
–

I am trying to say that if you have no qualms to kill a sentient being like a pig for what you consider to be your basic biological need (food that is not vegetarian) then maybe you don't stand on a very firm moral ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:03 PM
–

Most people consider a proper meal to include another being's dead corpse, so yes, you could very much make that comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 02:59 PM
2

Imagine a world where half the people die of starvation because they just aren’t skilled enough to hunt for their own survival. Imagine then someone tried to give them a lecture about how food is not a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:07 PM
15

For women, to fail to be wife material is a huge anti-achievement. For men, to be considered husband material and yet never hook up material is again, a huge anti-achievement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:04 AM
5

In particular women at large find masculinity attractive and any sign of lack thereof repulsive. What better sign of lack of masculinity than being dominated by another man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:32 PM
15

Your dismissive comment entirely ignores the TREND: most women wouldn’t date a bi guy because gaiety is a turn off for women. Not so the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:29 AM
3

Why are you disgusted by hypocrisy? It’s merely rooted in diverging sexual strategies for the two different sexes. It’s like being disgusted a short woman prefers a tall man, as if it’s some kind of hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 10:49 AM
4

I think he is mad because in between the lines, or not even, you seem to insinuate the premise of the question is outlandish (it isn’t).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:49 PM
1

Perhaps read more.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:39 AM
-1

Your response beautifully exemplifies the solipsism of women. No, the worst thing that could happen to a human is not rape. It is murder. Now they are recovering the bodies of the men who were murdered in Gaza after the women were already swapped in the previous hostage exchange (yes, they were raped). Why do women consider rape worse than murder then? Because biologically their biggest asset is their fertility, robbing them of this choice is perhaps the most profound violation of their bodily f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:36 AM
-2

Why, then, in the hostage negotiations that happen now, e.g., between Israel and Gaza, they demand to "at least" bring women and children first? The phrase "women and children" kept echoing in my head in regards to this hostage negotiations. Nobody was questioning, why women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:04 AM
1

I think personally I don't really -want- anything out of women but I must admit that after mostly passively reading this sub for several years I cannot help but feel an urge for more peace between users. One thing that I identify as missing is women acknowledging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect and all its consequences on our society, and also, both sides acknowledging where this reality is coming from (biology) instead of having a pikachu face whenever they realize ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 11:58 PM
0

You can't really complain about these things just as you can't complain about being too warm when you stand in the sun or that a snake has venom. It is just biological reality: the sooner you accept it the quicker you might have serenity in your life. I think the main complaint which I read among these pages from men is not about what reality is, but being _seen_. In all these sticky rom-coms or chick-flicks people always talk about being -seen-, that psychological experience of having your expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 11:37 PM
0

No, the definition of "loved unconditionally" is not "saved first in crisis". That was one example out of many of a manifestation of what I'm talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect The concept of "the ones who love you back" is not really a concept but as I was trying to allude a joke. You do have legitimate claim to ask about the origin of a joke since every joke is rooted in some truth. Here is that truth: for most men (especially those who get very little atte…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 11:09 PM
0

I think people are taking this too seriously but fine. To become serious, we should probably first disentangle the two notions of love by which “unconditional love” is meant: one is romantic love within the confines of a relationship (that love is indeed never unconditional) and the other is general support and affection from society for the mere reason you’re alive, the kind of “women are wonderful” effect. I think when we say “women are loved unconditionally” we mean to bemoan the fact that an…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:42 PM
2

The ones who love you back.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter