TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Yard_1042 Archive

View 0 posts and 114 comments by Ok_Yard_1042 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Out of curiosity, why do you think women study then? Because being able to make money means they are not dependent upon non-Chad men, which allows them further access to Chad. Yes, therefore I don't have a full picture of the male perspective. I don't know how post-nut clarity works in men, but generally the chemicals from the act keeps me disinterested for the rest of the day and focused on my studies. I'd assumed that - due to the presence of a refractory period for men - this effect would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 05:10 AM
8

and because we're Asian, our entire lives revolve around studying. And why do men study? Because money can get women and for most men, it is the only way to attract a woman. I can't imagine that just jacking it wouldn't be enough to clear your mind. Are you a woman? Idk, the way that you described male behavior seems to reduce the entire gender to "ooga booga need tibbies", Women are no different. Everything a woman does in life is, in some way, geared towards her objective of attracting Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 04:40 AM
3

How do you think those ugly genetics got here? Short and ugly women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 04:37 AM
1

I think you are entirely missing the point. People are going to be upset that they were lied to. Equality is good. Agreed, so society should no longer take the complaints of women seriously and really should just mock them as they do with mens'.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 02:37 AM
2

I disagree, you have to be pretty stupid to think that society would treat a complaining man the same way as a complaining woman "Would" and "should" are two entirely different things. And no, you do not have to be stupid to believe it, when you are raised all your life that the two genders are equal and should be treated the same. The shock and the understandable resentment comes when people realize that all the talk of equality only matters when it benefits women. Society SHOULD take the compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 02:16 AM
1

Marriage happens when peoples hormones overtake any rationality. I didn't know dollar bills were a hormone lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:48 AM
2

Because when women whine about things being unfair for them, it is treated as a highest priority issue by society. So, it's perfectly reasonable for men who think erroneously that society views them as people to believe that they will get the same treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:48 AM
4

Women act worse than desperate men because there are no consequences for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:46 AM
2

With that said, ugly men should also not become bitter and violent because they were born ugly. In a society like ours? It is absolutely reasonable to be upset about it. In an ideal society that treats them like legitimate human beings? That's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:39 AM
1

Ok then. No more welfare or child support then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:15 AM
10

Woman moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:59 AM
10

I dont think historically men have had to fight to be considered humans. Err, we STILL have to. Never heard of conscription?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:49 AM
2

I don't agree that we should force anyone to work for someone, so, no, there's no way to make housing, food, etc., fair without violating someone's rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:37 AM
14

Not all women can get a man to sleep with them Haha WHAT?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:33 AM
1

Sorry, I have as much empathy for female problems as women do for male problems: zero. Almost all men are ugly and yet almost all men are paired Yes, in transactional relationships (IE: prostitution).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:32 AM
3

Well women are and have been eating a shit sandwich for roughly 100,000 years. Welcome to human existence. So it’s a bit different. Here in the west women were made equals arguably 50 years ago? If you think women were property in any way that men weren't also property in most of western history, then I would again urge you to pick up a history book. Still a lot of places today that women don’t have the luxury of being seen as people. Not my problem. I have as much empathy for the problems of wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:31 AM
9

It's not designed to benefit normal men. Not anymore, at the very least. We are not considered people after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:27 AM
2

The difference is ugly women largely do not exist whereas, by comparison, almost all men are ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:20 AM
3

You can make that argument about housing, food, education etc. No you can't. Housing, food, education all require someone else to use their body in some way to create it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:19 AM
2

The problem is that when women cry "unfair", it is addressed as a legitimate problem. I would largely agree with you if both genders' problems received the same treatment. They don't, though, and that's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:19 AM
11

Not all single women can get their needs met as you assume Yes, they can. Tinder is free. Please answer my other question.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:17 AM
13

Good thing they weren't, largely, property. At least no more than men were property themselves (serfdom, slavery, etc.). Perhaps you should pick up a history book. But men have the right to two things: To know the truth of how women see them. To check out of said social contract if the terms offered do not appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:16 AM
11

Any sort of social contract. Clearly society is not offering them anything they want, so, why participate or hold up their end of the bargain?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:55 PM
35

"Single" women are not single in the way "single" men are. Single women can have their sexual needs met any time any where by extremely attractive men. Single men, generally, cannot. There are so many things outside of the pursuit of women men could spend their time on. Develop hobbies go to therapy. Make therapy a hobby Are you a woman? This is a genuine question, because I would not expect a woman to understand the intensity of the male sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:54 PM
11

Lol. ONS are not a good place to explore your sexuality. Sure they are. You can try out new things, find what type of people you like (or don't like), all of that. Get experience, basically. I know what kind of jobs I like, what kind of managers I like, and so on because I have had a bunch of good and bad jobs. but being all cut up because you haven’t had an ONS is pure FOMO Which means a woman has never desired you. If you’re living your life in a haze of sadness because you’re not receiving co…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:51 PM
11

Don't get to. For most men, the only sex they get is if they pay for it either with money or through commitment in a relationship. Casual sex is unattainable for most. Seriously - a couple of ONS is all it takes to reveal to most guys that they’re not particularly pleasurable or fulfilling. One night stands are the objective measurement of your attractiveness to the other sex. Besides, most guys would like the chance, I think, to get to explore and enjoy their sexuality. They don't get it though…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:28 PM
18

Who knows? But I do think that large numbers of men with no hope never bodes well for a society (and nor should it, because those men clearly are not getting anything from the social contract).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:22 PM
18

Go work part time or something. They won't be buying houses. They won't be buying cars. All those big purchases that keep large sections of the economy going? They simply won't do them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:17 PM
48

Most male activity in society is done to gain access to women. If men learn that it is not going to happen, then they will generally just stop doing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:08 PM
94

Yes. But they won't because the whole system falls apart when the majority of men realize that they are and always will be repulsive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 10:54 PM
0

that is pretty interesting because my whole life women have been telling me how looks aren't that important, and that men are shallow because they only care about looks. It's called projection and, of course, lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 10:52 PM
2

But that’s not a relationship. Yes, it is. Perhaps you meant "committed, monogamous relationship" which is something else. But yes, fat women have ZERO problem finding "committed, monogamous relationships". They could all have one within the hour if they want. The problem is that it won't be with the men they desire. I am reminded of how they had to make the "foreveralonewomen" sub private because people kept trying to date them. A man having multiple girlfriends at a time is not the norm and is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 10:41 PM
4

Again, you are missing the point. I never said a single word about any solution or if there even was one. What is the point in talking about solutions when even discussing whether there is a problem is verboten in most of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 10:11 PM
2

If the ratio of men to women is roughly 50:50 It's not, though, especially not at younger ages. But unless you’re saying polygamy is the norm Overt polygamy, no, but guys "dating" multiple women at a time? Even when the women know it? Absolutely. Besides, we are talking about attraction. The only way to measure that is with casual sex. The media preaching body positivity doesn’t suddenly make obese and awkward women find relationships. No, but these women want Chad like all other women. That mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 10:10 PM
2

There are almost no "ugly" women, at least ugly in the sense that no men find them sexually attractive. Fat and awkward women have zero problems finding sexual or relationship partners, too, and I am old enough to have seen how female beauty standards have changed over the past few decades to now include women who would have been considered morbidly obese 20 years ago. Secondly, ALL women, regardless of their age or appearance benefit from the positive attributes we naturally associate with wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 09:11 PM
1

No, I mean women in general. Most women have and continue to do so, so it is safest to assume they all have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 09:09 PM
17

Deep-seated cultural beliefs are NOT easy to remove, unfortunately. Life would be a lot different if they were. Men are, after all, the romantic gender. That is the cause of a lot of our problems with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:26 PM
1

Glad that you agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:21 PM
41

Most men do not get to participate in "hook-up" culture no matter how much they may want. So, it is relationships or celibacy. But I imagine the desire for romance is a culturally programmed thing. Unfortunately, it's not so easy to remove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:13 PM
1

"Tend" does not mean "always." But it is also important to remember that none of this has anything to do with sexual attraction. As I have shown, this is all simply an economic transaction. Women do not look at your degrees and get aroused. They look at your height, your muscles, and preferably your criminal record. That is what turns them on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:08 PM
1

I'm saying women prefer men with comparable education. I think you mean "more", and that is because more education tends to result in more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 07:21 PM
8

Whether or not the solutions are palatable does not change whether it is unfair. Something can be unfair but have no solutions. No one is even willing to acknowledge that it is unfair for men, though. This is the pattern with all issues that primarily effect men. Even acknowledging it as a problem is something repugnant to people, especially women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 07:20 PM
1

Thank you for agreeing with me that women desire men who make more money than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 07:07 PM
2

It doesn't take much effort to do your research and realize you're wrong. For example: https://www.politico.com/newsletters/women-rule/2020/02/07/why-do-women-prefer-richer-men-488275 There's nothing wrong with women preferring this. That's their own choice. But to act like women don't care is the height of foolishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 06:48 PM
3

If you want to disagree that women prefer men who make more money than themselves, then I really don't see any point in further discussion given you might as well be disagreeing that 2 + 2 = 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 06:39 PM
2

If that’s your lot in life why is there so much push against it? Push against women having fun? Women are free to do as they please but I would rather everyone be equally miserable. I will never get the ‘Stacy treatment’. Pretty privilege exists for both sexes. Correct. However, you do get an enormous advantage in the fact that people simply like women more. The "women are wonderful" effect is well-documented. Secondly, almost all women are "pretty" to one extent or another. Truly ugly women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 06:19 PM
2

Women can now participate in the economy. They no longer need to marry for resources or security. It's why women are now more selective. Yet they mainly choose to marry men who make more money than them and then whine when they cannot find them. Curious!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 06:11 PM
3

What are you basing this filtered out by height on? Tinder? 6'0" is the generally accepted minimum standard for casual sex and most men are shorter than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 06:09 PM
2

Could you please address the point rather than some silly non sequitor? Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:57 PM
1

I don't agree that beauty standards are more rigorous for men. Even though the majority of men are already filtered out by not meeting the beauty standard of height? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:56 PM
1

Cool, but that makes you a very uncommon exception to the rule that marriage is, for women, an economic transaction: she offers sex to a man she does not desire in exchange for resources, security, protection, or whatever. Again, the only way to look at which men women find attractive is by looking at casual sex. Who are the men that women sleep with when the only thing they stand to gain is sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:55 PM
16

The problem with a lot of the guys here is they are completely obsessed with unfairness. And understandably so. All our lives, when something has been deemed unfair for women, it becomes a societal issue that gets attention, money, all of that thrown at it to fix it. I do not think it is unreasonable for men who grew up in such an environment to believe that unfairness for men should be addressed in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:52 PM
1

Marriage and dating have little to nothing to do with sexual attraction (at least from the female point of view). To see who women find sexually attractive, you have to look at casual sex. They are likely not having casual sex with the same guys they date or marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:50 PM
0

Having sex once in a year generally would not qualify as "wild and free when young." I’d actually say if MOST men were going sexless there would be a lot more camaraderie instead of shame surrounding it. There is shame because admitting it means you are even less likely to have sex. Besides, that survey was not about casual sex. It was about sex in general. The point is that most men don't get to have wild and free youths like women do. We have to work and MAYBE when we are older we can get a ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:21 PM
2

Women view most men as asexual, genderless beasts of burden who should know their place, stay quiet, keep working, and leave women alone. They do not view most men as possessing any sort of humanity: that is reserved for the ones who they find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:18 PM
2

They can do as they please, but we know that women are perfectly happy to immediately sleep with some men without wanting anything in return, so I do not think it is unreasonable to expect her to do the same with men she claims to find sexually attractive. She doesn't have to sleep with anyone she doesn't want to, just like a man doesn't have to associate with a woman who clearly only views sex with him as transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:17 PM
0

Is that not normal for men and women? No. Most men don't get the opportunity to "be wild and free when young."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:43 PM
2

Because when women say "men", they generally mean "Chad", so it's actually true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:42 PM
5

Find yourself a nice homely girl who doesn't care your not a looker Those women are busy sleeping with Tinder Chad to notice normal guys, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:53 AM
2

Congrats on being hot. Most men don't get that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:53 AM
2

I do not think it is so outlandish to say "A woman who finds you sexually attractive will want to have sex with you simply to have sex." Average guys can pick up chicks and get fucked the same night I could get laid in an hour if I want, but I'll have to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:49 AM
2

Again, the lives of people in hollywood have nothing to do with most people, B-list celebrity at the time or no. Again, if she isn't sleeping with you immediately with no work on your part, she does not find you sexually attractive. That's it. Marriage nor relationships have anything to do with any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:31 AM
2

Trying to make a point about how women aren't shallow by saying "just be a famous rich actor, bro" is kind of silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:28 AM
8

It is proof that women have some neurotic requirement to make sure there is NOTHING that men can claim solely their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:23 AM
2

Yes, men, just become a world-famous actor, it's THAT easy! Like I said before, any man can have sex if he wants to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:22 AM
2

Two attractive people can have an ugly child, especially male children, since it only takes one flaw to render a man sexually repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:19 AM
2

We were talking about sexual attraction. What do wives and girlfriends have to do with that? Marriage, especially, is an economic transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:10 AM
2

So, whats the deal? People like you make shit up on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:07 AM
2

The man has a body count in the 70s. He must have paid then. Not hard. That or he has no pictures on his account. Simple as. If he got his wick dipped one night but can’t get a call back the next than what is that then? Oh he’s suddenly unattractive? That means he is sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:53 PM
2

Don’t need to. My homie is a solid 10, a beautiful man. Hasn’t hit a match in MONTHS. Hate to break it to your friend, then, but he is not a "solid 10". For a one night stand. One night stands are how sexual attractiveness is measured. If you have to offer ANYTHING else for sex, then she does not want to have sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:34 PM
2

Even attractive men are getting swiped to the left. Go try it yourself if you don't believe me. You are using Tinder, a hook up app, as a basis for long term sexual attraction and romantic relationships? There is only sexual attraction. There is no such thing as "long term" sexual attractiveness. Any man can have a romantic relationship if he wants to pay for it. Tinder IS an objective measurement of your attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:24 PM
1

So take birth control. No need for abortion, problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:21 PM
1

You don't have to do anything to have women attracted to you. If you are hot, post pictures on Tinder and you will have all sorts of women salivating over you and prostrating themselves before you. It's that easy (if you're hot).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:14 PM
2

Yeah, and who’s attracted to Jeremy Meeks? Trailer trash bitches that look like Jersey Shore extras Women in general. But that is besides the point: even if what you say is true, he has SOME women attracted to him. Most men have NO women attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 11:08 PM
2

Tall and hot sure. Violent no. I see you have never heard of Jeremy Meeks. Johnny Depp is 5’10, hot, not particularly violent, fawned over, caught what some believe was the prettiest girl on earth... That girl then cheated on him with Elon Fucking Musk. So... Robert Pattinson, the heart throb of 2010, cheated on... his girl cheated on him with Rupert Sanders. Tall but... average in the looks department. Wow, rich guys get fawned over? Let me go and become a famous hollywood actor, thanks for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:56 PM
2

It doesn’t matter if you’re tall, hot, and definitely violent It absolutely does lol. Or are you saying that tall, hot, and violent men do not get women fawning over them? Are you really that delusional? Come on now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:43 PM
1

You realize it only takes ONE fuck to get pregnant, right and that this can happen whether that one fuck is with a spouse or a one night stand? So just don't have sex. It's that easy. As the above poster said: "Lol dude women don't build their lives around sex amd getting sex. Jesus christ " Beyond that, women tell men all the time that sex isn't that important. So, just stop having sex. Why can't you just stop having sex if sex isn't all that important?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:32 PM
2

You gave up. Absolutely. I would call someone a fool if they tried to win an unwinnable game. It sucks, but it is what it is. There are people still living on their mothers couch, average as both you and me, getting more ass than the both of us. Absolutely, because women don't care about your economic stature when it comes to sexual attraction. If you are tall, hot, and violent enough, you can be homeless and you'll have no shortage of suitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:31 PM
2

Eh, you’re probably average looking Yes, I am ugly. To a woman, average men are hideous. The problem is likely that your personality is ugly. Now it is, sure, and it should be, too. If you treat something like you hate it, then do not be surprised when it does not act all sunshine and roses. But was it so in the past? No. Men should be not be nice people when they are not treated well. You’re boring as hell as you’ve dedicated yourself entirely to quite boring things like material possessions, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 10:07 PM
6

Most men absolutely are disposable and unwanted (except for their economic output, of course), if they are not extremely physically attractive. Women didn't cause it, at least not in a conscious method. You might as well blame the sun for setting. But women are the way women are and they are not going to change. Men absolutely should be told the truth. I have zero hope of being sexually or romantically successful, but I do find fulfillment in making sure men know exactly how women think of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:55 PM
7

Sex is transactional for almost all men, but not all of them. Very attractive men do not need to offer anything for sex. Indeed, very attractive men can even charge women for sex. Their sexuality has value because it can be exchanged for other things or simply desired for itself. The sexuality of most men will never be anything but a cost that women have to pay to get what they actually want. My guess is that you’re saying men in relationships aren’t desired because you need to give more for her…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:54 PM
2

Any man can get laid if they have money or are willing to engage in transactional relationships. I'm ugly, so, unfortunately, the only access I have to women and sex is by offering something else. I am not desired inherently as a sexual creature and never will be. My sexuality is a cost to women, never a benefit. Since I would like to be desired but never will be, the only logical course of action is to not engage in the metaphorical equivalent of banging my head on a concrete wall for no gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:36 PM
7

The more sex she has with you without requiring anything in return, the more desired you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:34 PM
7

So you think it's ok to deceive men because the reality might be uncomfortable or unpleasant for other people? Do you realize that your attitude is specifically why men should be told the truth? I think it is very understandable that they would be angry when you are ok with lying to them so society can use them without any real reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:33 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:26 PM
8

Because there is nothing in the transaction for the woman except sex. So, if she did not value sex with you, then sex would not occur.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:26 PM
8

We weren't talking about marriage. Marriage has nothing to do with sexual attraction. It is an economic transaction. The way to determine what women find attractive is via casual sex. So overall saying you’re screwed if you’re not in the top 20% is just theory. Most men don't get casual sex, therefore, most men are not desired by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:20 PM
2

Why do I feel like your ideal man is John Cena? My ideal man is one who has a life where he can explore and enjoy his own sexuality. One must be sexually attractive to do so. I don’t think God blesses men with little sexual instinct. He does. Desire is the root of suffering, and desiring people who inherently will never desire you back is prone to bringing lots of suffering. Are you playing the game or is the game playing you? Me? I stopped entirely. I could not win, so what is the point in tryi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 09:20 PM
3

Yeah, being clean. Put together. Some sense of responsibility for ones well being. No, none of that matters. What matters is being tall, with a specific facial structure, jacked, and aggressive. That's it. How fucking BORING. If thats the way you choose to live your life than more power to you buddy. Who am I to say “Don’t do that, its a waste of time” but Heterosexual men largely do not get a choice in that. God truly has blessed those men born with zero to little sexual instincts. The fact you…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:47 PM
5

We shouldn’t tell struggling men they’re inadequate and say there isn’t much they can do about it. Why not? It is the truth. If they lash out, then that is society's problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:42 PM
10

Ordinary guys in that 80% can build themselves rewarding lives. Those lives just won't include sleeping with long lists of hot party girls. Nor will they involve sleeping with women who actually desire to sleep with them. If they can get by in life without that, then I am honestly quite envious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:40 PM
4

It depends on what the man wants. If he's ok just with getting laid, then paying hookers will do it. If he wants women to want and desire him, then absolutely, getting into the top 20% is the BARE minimum requirement otherwise he will be miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:40 PM
3

There is no hierarchy to anybody that doesn’t view people as a checklist of different “ideal” traits. There is. There are plenty of things that women almost universally consider attractive (and the lack of them to be disgusting). The goal is to make you a basic ass motherfucker defined by his possessions, financial success, and fleeting youth. So? Sexual success is required for most men to be satisfied with life. If this is what is required to be sexually successful, then that is just the way it…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 08:10 PM
4

It also means that the 20% that most guys get is simply transactional/obligation, not actual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:51 PM
3

Those people are like that because they are low on the hierarchy and people (especially women) treat them like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:23 PM
1

You are the one who said: "Lol dude women don't build their lives around sex amd getting sex" So, if what you said is true, why don't women just stop having sex? Problem solved. They will never have to have a child they don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:39 PM
2

Nobody wants to be forced to have a baby. So why don't women just stop having sex since their lives, as you said, aren't based around getting sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:36 PM
-2

Lol dude women don't build their lives around sex amd getting sex. Yes they do. See the recent furor over the fact that they may have to stop having random unprotected sex with men because they can't get abortions. You might think someone forced them to watch a bunch of puppies getting killed or something. Women are absolutely sex-crazed creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:30 PM
-3

Well, yes, it is probably easier to relax and get sleep or have a better work-life balance if you have one of the most pressing needs in your life met whenever and however you want. Let's also not forget that women have the choice of work-life balance. For most men, the only way they can attract a woman is with resources so if men, with much stronger sexual drives, want women, they have little choice but to abandon work-life balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:25 PM
0

Women are happier "single" because "single" for women is not nearly the same thing as "single" for men. A single woman can have her sexual needs met by a variety of very attractive men whenever and wherever she desires. Most single men cannot get their sexual needs met at all by women. If women had to be single in the same way men do, well, I am fairly certain you would see female mass suicide all over the place. Look how they freak out when you suggest that they simply don't have sex if they do…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:20 PM
3

Most men aren't ugly as fuck Yes they are. Most men are below 6 feet tall, for instance. This pretty much disqualifies them permanently from female sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:22 AM
1

Thanks for the concession that you are incorrect. Have a good evening!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:47 PM
1

Plenty of people think men have inherent value myself included. But most people do not. That is why no one cares when bad things happen to men as a group. See: male suicide, combat deaths, workplace deaths, lower life expectancy, etc. Either way, this is secondary to the actual discussion. So, could you please address my points or concede that you are incorrect?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:00 PM
3

I somehow doubt that all children will starve to death. Somehow, societies did exist before we subsidized the bad decisions of people. They’ll get way more out of feeding and educating them to further society. Citation needed, because the money spent on things like welfare and public education could be far better spent on other things or simply allowing taxpayers to keep it for themselves. As we are told, no one owes anyone anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:47 PM
3

How would letting children starve help society in anyway. The government wouldn't have to spend money on feeding them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:28 PM
2

It isn't. It is simply a biological reality. But, again, could you please either address my points or admit that you are unable to and concede the argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 08:34 PM
2

Could you please address what I have said rather than complete non sequiturs? Besides, men are lonely because men have no inherent value as people (at least in the eyes of other humans) and thus are treated as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:34 PM
1

Sentient creatures starve and die in all sorts of horrible ways every single day and have so long as there has been sentient life. A conscience? That is a personal thing. If it bothers you so much, feed them yourself but do not expect others to act on your conscience. A social contract? There is no social contract. As we are told frequently, no one owes you anything. So, it follows that no one owes anyone any food if they can't get it themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:24 PM
0

That is not answering the question. What about civilization requires us to feed people who cannot feed themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 05:43 PM
-2

I don’t think “let children starve” is a good idea Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 08:48 AM
2

Most people are average looking. Not ugly or super hot. Average is ugly, though. The average man in the US is like 5'7" which basically disqualifies him for life from female desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 05:18 AM
-4

No they don't. If the mom can't feed them, then let them starve. No need to have government involvement at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:39 AM
1

any increase in lonely men also means the same level of increase in lonely women. No it doesn't, because women are perfectly ok being in one very attractive man's harem.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:01 PM
1

American women can be incredibly vapid in conversation (text). This ultimately is simply because they do not find you sexually attractive. Go replace your dating profile pictures with those of some really hot guy and see how much women really like to talk.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 06:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter