TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OklaJosha Archive

View 1 post and 78 comments by OklaJosha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
76

Fathers/CustodyOklaJosha/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:45 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

She should take an unwanted compliment because she's ugly? Come on now
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:34 PM
4

Are you really suggesting to excise all women he works with from his professional life?
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:32 PM
5

sounds like a standard dad-bod to me
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 01:09 AM
2

Even on a purely self-determined morality, it's possible to be mistaken. Most certainly. "The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction not a destination" (Rogers, 1967, p. 187). Rogers stated that there are 3 parts to the "self": self worth, self image, & ideal self. The more your self image & ideal self overlap, the higher your self worth. Of course, these are always changing.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:08 PM
2

I did not get the same take-aways from reading Rousseau & Rogers. They were doing thought experiments of ideals & utopias. "What I feel is right is right, what I feel is wrong is wrong." He encouraged his students to decide their own morals for themselves I think there is an implied "to me" on the end of each of those statements. This doesn't discredit thinking about others or caring for others. But it's up to the individual to decide if they do care about others. basically implying that in the …
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:36 PM
6

yes, it does. Here's a link to the article mentioned, which references a USDA study found here. About 30% of the cost is Housing, then 18% is child care & education (not including college), and 16% goes towards food.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:35 PM
4

Second one from the back on the left may be black, but it's like a Steph Curry level if at all.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 05:10 AM
1

I don't think flirting matches the second part of (i) or (ii). It's an "and" test.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:24 PM
1

It's how you present the numbers. Overall, YES the average women makes less than the average man. BUT this is not because women in the same position are paid less than men. It's because of education, experience, & career choice.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:38 PM
2

I've heard this way: No, there is not a "wage" gap, when you control for education, experience, & career choice. However, there is an "earnings" gap because of the above mentioned things.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:36 PM
5

Children & Family Movies starring Ashley Olsen (1329) Mary Kate never gets any love
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:05 PM
2

I really like the "experiences of women" graph: Witnessed sexist behavior - check Received demeaning comments from male colleagues - check Have been told they're too aggressive - check, "hey man, chilll out" Asked about family life in interviews - check Felt excluded from networking opportunities based on gender - check. How many women's groups are there vs men's groups? Received unwanted sexual advances - check, had a manager grab my ass multiple times when I was a waiter in high school. Shorte…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:07 PM
1

relevant xkcd
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:45 PM
3

Yeah, but luckily there are some legal precedents for this type of thing. In Child Protection cases, a DHS worker only needs Some Credible Evidence to get a child out of a potentially dangerous home. This is mainly because the child can receive backlash after a report, & is about keeping them safe. If the charge is erroneous, the parent has a legal recourse to go to trial. It seems they want that standard for a conviction in rape cases, which I haven't heard of. Usually for criminal cases, you n…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 09:58 PM
28

Let's be more intelligent than this
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:28 AM
1

link?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:45 PM
1

Army Strong
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:59 PM
2

Full screening the video, it looked pretty clear her eyes went up before she turned to Mel. Also, it happened instantly after the mention of the words "patriarchy, rape culture"
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:26 PM
11

[question]"Will Season 6 more overtly address and complicate these criticisms by showing them as the pitfalls of patriarchy, rape culture, and other forms of oppression?" [Carolyn Strauss]"Yes" ... "You know, I think, they're trying to put together the best and uh most, 'realistic' would be the wrong word. But the mix of those personalities, in that world at that mythical time, that the show takes place, and so..." "Things were not great. For a lot of people. Male and female." [Maisie Williams] …
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:19 PM
5

If the consent classes actually told the legal definitions, that'd be great. Right now, they're just as vague, if not more so, as the "few drinks" comment.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:19 PM
1

So fear of the hypothetical accusation? Scared of confrontations, no confidence in ability to handle them, paranoid people won't take your side, scared of what they might think. No possible physical harm, no legal harm. From this I agree with your wife. It's one thing to be prepared for a possible situation another to avoid it entirely.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:43 PM
1

If they started shouting at you, that's not an understandable response. You handle situations as they unfold. If it does happen, remain calm, that person is not in the right & you have proof from in the form of kids there with you + your wife. They'd be the ones embarrassed after that. Sure announce it. "I'm just taking pictures of my kids. Leave me alone crazy woman!" Should do the trick
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:06 PM
1

I do not need to be accused of that in public. Often these things are guilty until proven innocence What could a situation possibly be? If someone did approach you, tell them you're taking pics of your family & tell them to leave you alone. If they don't believe you at first, what would they do? Your niece & wife would be coming down the slide soon, ignore that person & let them be proven wrong. If you're that worried about it, wait until you see them at the top & wave so everyone sees you speci…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:38 PM
1

The difference in risk quite different though. Your situation, the risk is someone approaching you & possibly getting into an argument.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:26 PM
1

you have every right to take photos of your family. Don't let fear dictate your life.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 02:44 PM
2

deducing / assuming. Whatever man. putting up the proposition that this could possibly be an explanation for the behavior is not the same as trying to argue that it's true.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 04:53 PM
-3

lol, you're assuming that he's making an assumption. he said multiple times he's not talking about this particular case. He just put up a scenario where someone saying something nice about a person doesn't automatically exonerate them.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:06 PM
-4

I was highlighting the 'guilty until proven innocent' statement, not the exculpatory part. That's for the people in the trial to decide, not me.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:59 PM
-3

So...by simply accusing him he is guilty until proven innocent Come on now. He didn't say that at all. He merely pointed out the fact that there are cases of the known phenomenon Stockholm Syndrome. Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:57 PM
1

Interesting, I hadn't heard of these. It does seem smart to do, especially for the woman who would be taking the bigger risk of not working. I think most couples though go by the thinking: if both spouses agree on one staying home, the other is committing to take care of them for the rest of their life, or at least a set period of time (marriage vows are supposed to be forever). Of course, that agreement doesn't take into account the cost of 2 homes, etc...
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:22 PM
2

If they want anything for their new arrangement they should be signing additional paperwork for it. Do you mean during the marriage? That seems weird
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:56 PM
1

I wasn't saying the payment would be more out of anger. Child support is calculated in part from income of the parent.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:48 PM
4

it didn't start at $4k/mo though. Kinda hard to tell from the article but it sounds like he gave nothing the first couple years, then was ordered to pay back those years & start at $500/mo. So I'm sure she struggled like crazy up to that point & probably a little after until the payments increased.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:28 PM
–

I guess they did go to court, which ordered the paternity test. a court order to provide child support and reimburse the state for its welfare costs, Jobs began paying $500 a month. Apple went public a month later... I bet that would have been much higher than $500/mo if she waited until after Apple went public.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:19 PM
–

I thought this was interesting how the focus is on the money that Steve Jobs didn't give, generally paints him as a stingy asshole, and jumps around timeline-wise. It just casually mentions that he did buy her a $400k house & 2 cars & pay for their child's private schooling. This lady wasn't even married to him, although they lived together & had a child, but thinks she's entitled to $25mil that he earned after they were broken up.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:10 PM
3

well that situation sounds unfair if there's no reason for her to stay at home, but that's not always the case. It could just as easily be a situation where the husband and wife have a discussion and decide together that one will stay home to raise the kids while the other works. divorce isn't always because a bored housewife fucks the poolboy.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:01 PM
0

yeah, that doesn't support your statement. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:17 PM
-1

the "widely considered ought to have" is probably the key here. The pro-choice/ pro-life split is pretty close to 50/50 http://www.gallup.com/poll/170249/split-abortion-pro-choice-pro-life.aspx
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:27 PM
-5

The question was: Name me one right women don't have in 2015 in the first world. This fact doesn't matter: women having more bodily autonomy than men. If both men & women don't have a right, then it is still a right women don't have. The argument that men don't have the right either, does not nullify the fact that women don't have the right.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:56 PM
1

I think the problem here is that there is no "truth". he was found "not guilty" which isn't the same as "innocent". Another defense to defamation actions is "privilege". For example, statements made by witnesses in court, arguments made in court by lawyers, statements by legislators on the floor of the legislature, or by judges while sitting on the bench, are ordinarily privileged, and cannot support a cause of action for defamation, no matter how false or outrageous. http://www.expertlaw.com/li…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:22 PM
0

all I said is that she has people that support her.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:55 PM
0

Nothing. I wouldn't assume to pass judgement with out knowing the validity of her claims.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:22 PM
0

But there's also millions that support her. Plus a senator. So she's got that going for her
/r/MensRights22/01/15 03:08 PM
2

don't steal it. it's <sup>TM</sup>'d! in all seriousness, I've just seen it around, I know it's been on reddit before, but maybe in other uses. you can use it for gay/straight, black/white, men/women, cats/dogs, etc... I guess I did just come up with the name though... I'm still claiming the Trade Mark.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:10 PM
6

Let's see if it passes the Gender-Reversal Test<sup>TM</sup> ! The case for closing men’s prisons is built on the experiences of formerly incarcerated men and activists who recognize that men who are fathers and community builders can find their way forward when they [are] respected and supported. It is possible to imagine a future without men’s prisons; whether it’s achievable will require a bigger shift in thinking. TLDR: nope.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:22 PM
2

so did he get the position the next year?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:50 PM
1

but according to the social contract that the US has made with its citizens (not tyranny), we have given the government the right to regulate trade under the Commerce Clause.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:42 PM
1

I think being able to get codified in law just means that the majority were not bigoted overall, but it could certainly be the case where entire towns/cities/ regions were bigoted. The private property thing is interesting. I think as soon as you make yourself a business that serves to the public, you open yourself up, it becomes no longer "private" property but the company's property. I might be with you if you limited your argument to sole proprietors where the person keeps all the liability.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:34 PM
7

... wut?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:04 PM
2

you are now limited to balls that can only hold less than 12 sperm. all balls that can hold >12 must be turned over to the proper authorities or sold to a licensed dealer out of state.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:45 PM
0

thanks for the tip teach
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:31 AM
4

someone has to do those jobs. Women doing it allowed the men to make those advancements.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:12 PM
8

from wikipedia: graduate of Princeton University and Harvard Law School, she worked as part of the staff of Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley, and for the University of Chicago Medical Center, skipped the second grade, By sixth grade, Michelle joined a gifted class at Bryn Mawr Elementary School, attended Whitney Young High School Chicago's first magnet high school, on the honor roll for four years, took advanced placement classes,was a member of the National Honor Society, and served as student co…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:30 PM
8

poutraged mistake or pun? either way, I like it.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:21 PM
8

50%
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:19 PM
2

does anyone have those statistics? I'd like to see.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:13 PM
2

yes. Here's a list of words with silent letters: http://mws.ust.hk/sir/silent_words.php
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:52 PM
2

You were close. "whole" is the spelling when used as "entire". "hole" is what is in the middle of a donut. (both pronounced the same) It's funny imagery when talking about shooting yourself in the foot :)
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:27 PM
1

I wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:58 PM
6

Companies won't give you the time of day if there isn't the threat of the media spotlight. losing money
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:24 PM
5

the age of consent is only for statutory rape, right? Child pornography is anyone not an adult, i.e. under 18.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:14 PM
4

I don't want any form of emotional relationship with her Tell her this. I do want sex practise because I'm not very experienced Tell her this too. Should i just continue to lead her on? No, that is shitty. I do have a mind for her feelings You're not showing it by leading her on. should I just be completely honest with her? Yes. I'd risk losing the sex possibly AND i would hurt her feelings. You'd hurt them more by leading her on. TLDR: Don't be an asshole.
/r/seduction23/06/14 10:02 PM
1

What would your solution be? Solution for what? If I was an administrator at the school my solution for the boy using his hand as a gun would've been to 1) not freak out or punish a boy who was playing, 2) to not invoke a zero tolerance policy, & 3) to apply some common sense to the situation. If I was parent or had some say in a school, I would use this news story to show why zero tolerance policies are a bad idea pointing to the admin passing off the blame, the "I'm just following orders" excu…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:37 PM
3

your post kinda rambled on, didn't address his points, & made assumptions. This conversation chain is talking about "are guns a problem?" & "who/what is saying guns are a problem?". Well then what's your problem with what happened here? Vague, what problem are you talking about? He stated his problem pretty clearly, one sector forcing change that majority don't agree with. If you don't have a problem with the hysteria in your country over guns and school shootings then why do you care if young c…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:36 PM
12

I 8==D you
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:54 PM
67

Why not objectify the athletes? The human body is amazing and these athletes are the very best of what the body is capable of. It's refreshing to see healthy athletes objectified over unhealthy supermodels. (see ESPN's the Body Issue. It's inspiring.)
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:53 PM
1

the smiling & laughing are good indicators of it being okay. Some couples are comfortable joking around with each other.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:13 PM
1

what about the, perfectly logical, "I'm not the only one who uses this computer" excuse?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:23 PM
2

What state do you live in? There's 12 states that have "all-party consent" while the others only have "one-party consent". Sucks you can't get damages. At least you got off and not screwed more.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:58 PM
1

GRRM also cuts a guy's penis off in Game of Thrones. (well, not him. but a character) It's just making a joke on how much penis is in that show.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 11:15 PM
2

That's a pretty bad generalization of women. I was glad for the women that were in my engineering classes. Also, it wouldn't hurt for some of the men in those classes to learn social skills around women.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:45 PM
3

I just thought it was to have a more grey character. I like bad guys that you can sympathize with and understand why they do something. e.g. Game of Thrones
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:31 PM
2

His own expectations that they both probably swore on oath when they were married.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:53 PM
2

Asking for a cigarette does not scare an adult woman. I'm saying it's reasonable that it could when she's alone late at night being approached by 2 strangers. They did not "scare a girl". They inquired to an ADULT WOMAN about a cigarette. It seems quite obvious to me that this girl was scared. Hence her reaction. Asking someone for a cigarette is not an attack or threat. I wasn't saying it was. Threatening to call the police because someone asked you for a cigarette, is a hostile, aggressive att…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:36 PM
3

I didn't pick up that she followed them back. It sounded like they were still behind her on the other side of the road, probably heading the other direction
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:27 PM
7

wow, I'm shocked at these top comments. I'm a guy and my take away of this is you are an asshole. Was her first response a little overboard? Sure, but it's understandable given the circumstances. She's walking alone late at night with 2 (drunk) men (most likely larger/ stronger than her) following her. It doesn't matter what you say or how nice you worded it. She's already on alert. As someone else pointed out, asking for a cigarette or the time can be a way to get closer to some one and distrac…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:18 PM
1

The "not worth it to help people" comments make me really sad...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:42 PM
-3

1 in 6 is much different to me than 1 in 1000
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter