TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OldGuyWithAttitude Archive

View 1 post and 405 comments by OldGuyWithAttitude on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
122

Legal RightsOldGuyWithAttitude/r/MensRights13/08/24 11:00 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You're using "irony to mock or convey contempt" towards someone that's agreeing with you! Ok then, bye
/r/MensRights10/02/26 02:23 AM
2

That seems like a weird response to someone agreeing with you? Pretty sure he's saying that your "MGTOW is not a movement" is factually correct and the dimwits responding are funny/sad, especially considering that his response to reality_upside_down starts with "It's not a movement".
/r/MensRights10/02/26 02:12 AM
208

I'd swear I read somewhere that discrimination based on gender was illegal...
/r/MensRights22/08/24 09:11 AM
6

I see feminism back then as a survival instinct, their lives were planned out for them and their only option was marriage and being inferior to their husbands. You can only say this because you've been brainwashed by the feminist propaganda. Read History, the older books, the history for both genders and get a total picture of what life was like for everybody. You've heard all about the suffragettes fighting to get women the vote but have you heard of the ANTI-suffragettes fighting AGAINST women…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:59 AM
11

A Vanderbilt University professor believes mathematics is sexist. July 2017
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:43 AM
10

Cue the feminist NPC. LMAO
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:19 AM
32

Edit: It was not auto-modded We don't have a narrative that cannot survive logic or reality and therefore questions aren't our kryptonite.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:12 AM
4

Just a heads up, You should log out and check your post history. You're being shadow banned in TwoX & AskFeminists.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:29 PM
3

The feminist propaganda has been
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:40 PM
6

Boomers were brainwashed by the "Disney Princess" & "What are little girls/boys made of" etc. The feminist propaganda has been going on since the fkn Rockefellers got involved just after WW2. Every generation has been further brain washed ever since. ONLY the intrenet & social media combined with the enormous availability of information online has allowed any sort of dissemination of the knowledge. eg. Men going overseas to find traitional wives has been going on for yrs but could only spread my…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 05:20 PM
22

LMAO edit: Imagine if you didn't have the "/s" and some twoX peoples came by and thought you were serious and positively replied. ROTFLMAO
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:51 AM
2

I didn't give you a source for patriarchy I gave you it's meaning and 2 questions to help you understand why it wouldn't increase dv. i wanted sources for feminism being a great failure even for women.... Consider this, if everything... Reread my previous reply from there down and think about it. Feminism must fail for it to continue to exist therefore how can it benefit women? to benefit women it must succeed which would mean no longer existing. Somehow after 70ish yrs of seriously affecting we…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:45 AM
3

Boys & girls are different so using the same methods, environment & curriculum for both is child abuse to at least one of them.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 05:29 AM
1

and vote!
/r/MensRights18/08/24 01:53 AM
1

Lawyers create/protect extrordinary profits, why do you think companies have so many of the damn things.The healthcare companies that employ doctors are extremely profitable. Drs & laywers in the Public sector may not get paid well but the public sector is not a profit driven capitialist owned company. I don't think I get your "Tech" part. Qualifications don't mean you can do the job they mean you passed a test(s) set by an institution that has vested interest in you passing those tests. Tech on…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 01:30 AM
2

huh?, did you mean to reply to BlueHorse?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 01:02 AM
1

France can’t speak. lol, that's just a silly statement pretending you don't understand I was referrig to the govn. The French gov recently passed laws banning fathers from getting dna tests because "because it had the potential to break up too many families"... a potential that could only exist if they think that too many husbands aren't the biological fathers. It’s like 2% of all births overall.... hardly an epidemic. Yes, your numbers are correct but you fail to take into account 3 things. 1- …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:31 AM
1

I think of it like a father, if your kid rebels, do you abandon them and let them hurt themselves? No, no good father anyways. Your conflating family & strangers, your Spartan example was about strangers and that's what I addressed. I will never not protect my loved ones. Maybe I'm just caught in my emotions, heck if I know. Your feelings are totally irrelevant if you want to understand anything, objectivity is a fundamental requirement. Heck, your feelings are largely irrelevant in your persona…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:13 AM
2

I think you should read the SCUM manifesto and then look at feminist history to see how far back that idea goes.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:04 AM
2

does patriarchy increase domestic abuse for women? No, patriarchy is being responsible for the entire families well being it was never for the benefit of men only. What man in his right mind would abuse the ones that cook his food? that he lays unconscious next to all night? On a societal scale the idea is idiotic. Consider this, if everything that feminists claim is a problem was fixed tomorrow would there be a reason for feminism to exist any more? If the answer is no then every job in the DV …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:02 AM
5

It's not taken directly from the CS, they get the payment from the federal govn.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:42 PM
2

said half the population could kill her with bare hands. Convenient that she split it along gender. Ask her to try it with men v men, women v children, women v women. Skinny little guys walking thru lanes/parks etc at night are no safer than women.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:37 PM
3

and paternity fraud is quite rare.. France says nuh-uh.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:30 PM
2

Men used to do this and are in fact hard wired to do it but we are now adapting to a changed society. To be a Spartan today is to get vilified and attacked and any number of spartans have faced criminal prosecution for standing up for others. Good that you stated your position, excellent that further down this thread you realised you misunderstood and accepted it. +100
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:28 PM
1

That would almost certainly be a yes.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:22 PM
5

/signed a boomer woman. Of course you'd say that, the patriarchy has kept you down. Smash those chains sister! Rise up and join us strong and independant women! and, y'know, maybe help us with stuff like the creepies burden. ;-)
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:14 PM
5

Lol, yeah I agree. Their presumption being that all boomers had the power to change society. Pretty funny considering that the same mouthy ones also complain that they don't have the power to change society.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:06 PM
1

In a capitialist society the capitialist set the value of jobs. Engineers directly contribute to profit, nurses don't. The less people that can, or will, do a profit producing job the more that jobs is worth.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:57 PM
1

Canadian, but I do know there are laws here where you cannot discriminate based on sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, culture, religion, race etc. Really, do you not have quotas in Canada?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:51 PM
1

Ah, yes. The reasonable, logical question that makes most feminist dimwits walk away and not bother you anymore. An excellent choice there mate. ;-) The only rare response I ever get to that are "The patriarchy" because somehow companies that are happily selling their customers poison or making the planet uninhabitable will for some reason forgo profits to pay men more. In which case I laugh loudly and walk away cause I have a very limited tolerance for stupid. lol
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:49 PM
81

and attractiveness, don't forget attractiveness.. ;-)
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:11 PM
4

Click the image there's another one below it.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:51 PM
1

I didn’t say “wait for robots.” And you didn’t quote anything I said. Starting here. Why not robots? Robots aren’t as developed as you might think yet Sure but until "yet" arrives men will die doing stuff that our society depends on. They should stop doing that. We’ll adjust. If it can’t be done safely, no need to do it unless you really just want to. Paraphrase your words and you'll get all 3 things I "quoted" you as saying in my very first sentence. You've so far used 1,270 words to not answer…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:13 PM
1

That's nice and all but I quoted 3 things you said and asked if they applied to 3 scenarios, also even if the scenario was personal. Nothing you replied addressed my actual questions.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 12:04 PM
1

Just curious, does your "don't do dangerous jobs, wait for robots, we'll adjust" apply to; firefighters running into burning buildigs to save children et al? the first responders on 9/11 running into the towers? the divers going into that Thai cave to rescue 12 kids? You'd be okay with "nuh-uh too dangerous" if your loved ones were in the burning bldg?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:20 AM
3

Just a heads up mate, afaik edited comments don't trigger a notification to a tagged user only new comments do. So if Jaded-Help1860 wasn't the OP he wouldn't have recieved a notification. edit: forgot the tagged
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:09 AM
13

Females in India 2021 Aged 15-64 = 447,337,000 Rape cases reported 2021 = 31,677 So 0.07 reported per 1,000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_India https://www.statista.com/statistics/632493/reported-rape-cases-india/ u/Kind-Relative-1615
/r/MensRights17/08/24 08:38 AM
3

You won't get any argument here for that comment. ;-) The data used is just to get an overall view of economic contribution and cannot be used to judge men vs women. It used to say so on the front page of the relative australian gov website, since moved to a single line buried on basicallly page 98. It's used my feminists out of context cause it's a great sound bite for their propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:41 PM
3

It's happening as we speak, see: MGTOW.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:11 PM
3

Sure but until "yet" arrives men will die doing stuff that our society depends on.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:09 PM
3

Robots aren’t as developed as you might think
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:02 PM
7

There are no robots to do this and even if there were when they malfunction 40 mtrs below the sea who is going to go get the damn things.. ;-) It was also just one random example.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:51 PM
11

Any number of jobs are just damn dangerous and it isn't possible to have 0 deaths. Underwater welder on a North Sea Oil Rig for example.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:40 PM
1

Does it matter? isn't "Is she Right?" the only thing that matters?
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:35 PM
10

Sorry OP, I forgot to post this link. https://archive.org/details/the-manipulated-man_202201
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:16 PM
5

Financial slaves. Via as you say taxes but also mortgages, loans, fuel prices. Funny how the cost of living expenses expanded to encompass the 2 income households available money.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:12 PM
35

Is it being withheld because for an ideological reason? If so, who is behind it? Yes, it goes against the agenda. Feminism was getting nowhere until people like the Rockefellers funded and promoted it. Getting women into the workforce almost doubled the available workforce which put enormous downward pressure on wages and created more consumer spending thus more profits. The Useful Idiots of Feminism deliver other benefits for the elite as well like, helping to keep us squabbling so we don't not…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:19 PM
0

I'll inform my gf of... oh you're married smh What's with the constant insults? are you compensating? anyway the incessant yapping of chihuahuas has never bothered me so carry on all ya like.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:55 AM
17

Excellent work mate! Feminists are gonna love you two! lmao https://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/ https://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/articles/ https://mothersofsons.info/
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:49 AM
2

Thanks for your advice, I'll inform my gf of 19ish yrs and my 2 adult daughters that I'll be busy for a while doing as you instructed.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:41 AM
0

Do you comprehend how a jet engine works, would you comprehend after 20 yrs of learning about them? You're assuming that you know all there is to know and that I've never had female friends.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:38 AM
1

I have 0 female "friends" and that has no bearing on how many male friends I have.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:11 AM
1

dont know what boyfriend stuff you are talking about.. <shrug> then how do you know I'm wrong. but if you treat your female friends like you are their boyfriend... did you even read what I said.. smh I don't have any female friends because THEY want boyfriend treatment. i sometimes carry heavy shit for them for different reasons but that far from being 'boyfriend stuff' because i'd carry heavy stuff for anyone weaker than me, male or female, old or young. You're assuming that I classify "carry h…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 09:10 AM
0

But I geniuenly have a question for u. Do u think that I'm wrong, and if so y? Yes, I think you're totally wrong. I'm short on time right now so I'll get back to you later with why. What exactly are the boundaries that you keep mentioning, can you give me a few examples?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:05 PM
30

The boy/girl stuff should be offensive to everyone. Now if you said "Feminists ride Bitch" or "Feminists not allowed in the truck" I'd be asking how many can I buy. ;-)
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:52 PM
-1

but I completly admit I could be wrong.. That's the important bit for you personally but then you go on to argue against that.. <sigh> you younguns.. ;-) If you need brain surgery what % of credibility will you give to the doc with 2yrs experience VS the doc with 20 yrs? You might be right here but the odds probably don't look good. Maybe you should be a bit careful going forward just in case you're wrong, being wrong could be very costly for you. oh, and just for context, my youngest daughter i…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:44 PM
6

No problem can be fixed without understanding what causes it. Any discussion that doesn't address what is causing Violence Against Women is not trying to fix the problem they are only interested in perpetuating it. Never forget: Feminism can not exist without victims.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 08:24 PM
-6

Well, I guess if you have more experience than me then maybe I should listen to you, so: - How many adult years of experience do you have with females?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:52 PM
2

It's impossible to talk about any large number of people without generalising. The problem is the exactness, we should be questioning the exactness of the statement. Just saying "Men are xyz" indicates they're referring to 60-80% of men. If that's accurate like "men are logical" then great but if it's "Men are violent" then we should be querying the actual statement instead of arguing against it. Push it back on to them to be more accurate in their words! They need to justify their statement! "M…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:38 PM
6

The pushback is about the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:17 PM
1

+100 I'm with you mate.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:14 PM
-6

No it isn't. You'll end up doing boyfriend stuff without the boyfriend benefits. Man/female isn't reciprocal like man/man.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 07:14 PM
494

I look forward to the Weight Bots.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 02:02 PM
29

Nice post OP, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:22 PM
26

Bots & passing feminist dimwits.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:22 PM
2

The avg man didn't give women the right to vote.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:46 AM
5

Yes it’s the women’s fault but I ultimately blame men for letting it happen. Exactly how did the avg man do that? Only a miniscule number of men have EVER had the power to shape society, these are the shitheads that supported fkn feminism in it's brain washing of the avg women to enable the destruction of the family unit.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:10 AM
7

You need to influence others to not be abusers. You need to make it clear that you are not going to just let it happen around you. How many abusers have you influenced to not be?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:03 AM
2

afaik it's only the state of Florida in the US.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 05:13 AM
3

The modern what? ;-)
/r/MensRights15/08/24 05:01 AM
2

is we don't have one.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 01:16 AM
23

<shrug> It's inevitable because both divorce & life expectancy favour women but it won't last as women also outspend men.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 11:45 PM
9

in any of my 3 divorces. Maybe I’m doing it wrong Yes.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 11:28 PM
1

I thik we should all try and convince Bettina to run for federal parliament.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:36 AM
0

Here y'are mate. The Cumpod 3. ;-)
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:38 PM
21

relax mate, you don't need an excuse. ;-)
/r/MensRights13/08/24 10:23 AM
11

I went to post a reply to your comment, then adjusted it for your first edit, now I see your 2nd edit. Maybe take a breath before <comment>. I'll maybe check later to see if your comment is finialised.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 09:55 AM
63

He personally abstained from it(masturbation), and never consummated his marriage. That has to be a cult type personality disorder surely?
/r/MensRights13/08/24 09:31 AM
18

The second paragraph; A new review of existing studies dating back 30 years found the more often men ejaculate, the less likely they are to develop prostate cancer. Which links to another article based on a review of 11 previous studies called "Ejaculation Frequency and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence". The second article even has a pretty graph showing the increase of cancer from 1994/96 --> 2016-18. The second article also links to an article in The Conversation th…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 09:29 AM
2

men are slightly more prone...
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:57 AM
1

The DEA didn't exist until they made a law.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:04 AM
2

If you're Indian you might get more relevant results in an Indian sub, you'll probably just get western info here. Unless that's what you're looking for of course.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:39 AM
-16

The original post has not been removed. (stated elsewhere) <shrug> so the mods didn't delete it. Maybe they decided, as Reverbiscrap suggests, that the Reproductive Coercion part is worth talking about. but even then the story is now; Guy says yes because he didn't want to face the consequences of saying no. Guy regrets saying yes because he now doesn't like the consequences of saying yes. Why aren't we talking about how personal responsibility and it's consequences often suck? This story is rea…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:26 AM
-23

A post about coercion, reproductive or otherwise, would be great because sometimes there are only 2 sucky choices and a discussion about how to decide and/or handle the consequences could be hugely beneficial to many. However his post muddied the waters too much with all the other "stuff" and most of the comments seem to be about the "stuff".
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:22 AM
9

There are two types of gender pay gaps: the controlled and uncontrolled gap. The controlled gap measures the difference in pay between men and women performing the same job, with the same experience and qualifications. Controlled wage gap Women $0.99 Men $1.00 from your evidence... SMH
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:49 PM
4

In fact, if you investigate, you'll find that 95% of the time, women are underpaid compared to men with the same experience and degrees. A link to the data would be appreciated. Actual data not articles.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:27 PM
8

+100
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:22 PM
-155

no, it's bs and not worth discussing. The mods will nuke it as soon as they wander by.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:54 PM
22

As a feminist I'm for equal rights for women... LOL, always funny when I see/hear that. feminist female scumbag Don't be sexist, they're all the same.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:52 PM
3

You're right but that just confuses the issue and I'm a simple guy so if it's true <shrug> I don't care what label gets put on it. Like, "no sweetheart I'm not sexist you just suck at reverse parking". ;-)
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:15 PM
4

We have funding for a study on why women's uteruses fall out after excercise. We are currently searching for these diabolical escaping uteruses and when they're found rest assured our interrogation techniques are excellent, we will get answers!.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 05:50 PM
1

you claimed to have non-feminist data
/r/MensRights11/08/24 10:24 AM
4

Don't worry about it, weird is subjective. Like <X> football club fans think all other football club fans are weird, or worse. Some people even think all footbal fans are weird. <shrug>
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:44 AM
2

I hate men but I love my father. is equal to; I hate pizza but love buffalo chicken pizza.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 02:39 AM
1

Paul Elam isn't some sort of god whose every utterance is correct. I can explain this stuff but it will take some time. Time which I'm not interested in spending unless you're actually interested in learning so little steps. Just ignore if you're not interested. oh, and your "~80% of women reproduced historically while only ~40 of men did." is not about Patriarchy or Gynocentrism it's about male competitiveness and female hypergamy. 1- If you have to use another person to explain your opinion it…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 02:15 AM
1

That article only talks about 3 studies with no links to the actual studies but it doesn't matter I was more interested in whether you would engage or not. but the biggest issue causing it is... Does agreeableness have a role in the wage gap, sure as does hrs worked but you said the biggest issue and agreeableness is only a factor when comparing male & female wages within the same role/industry. For the biggest issue try comparing earnings across industries and you'll see that males dominate alm…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 01:32 AM
1

I bet you can't prove either of your 2 statements. Culture: the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 12:57 AM
0

Comes from having two adult daughters. Even I eventually "got it" after being constantly bashed in the head with it.. lol Your gf might just be a keeper. ;-)
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:41 PM
5

Glass Ceiling = No woman has ever been CEO of a fortune 500 company. So the first woman that became a CEO of a fortune 500 company is said to have broken the glass ceiling. Just an example, I've no idea if it's broken yet. THE remaining biggie is; No woman has ever been President of the US.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:26 PM
-1

it's caused by women All you say is true but it doesn't disprove the gap it shows why there is a gap. I don't understand: Patriarchy Gynocentrism
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:20 PM
1

Excellent idea, I too could fund a ticket, also sadly only one way. Although I'd happily sell a kidney if that would get 2 tickets.. ;-)
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:09 PM
-1

It's the total income of all working gender / the total number of working gender. A link to your non-feminist data would be interesting unless it's the same data that I'm referring to but with controls applied. Controls like hrs worked, length of service, education etc that explain why the difference and prove that it's female choice that creates the wage gap not male oppression like the fkn feminsts screech.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:01 PM
60

Men May Be Better Off Staying Single.... May Be??? This seems like one of those "Well no shit sherlock" situations.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:36 PM
10

That's horrific and would certainly qualify. As you pointed out tho, that's in the east and unless a distinction is made the default around here is we're talking about the west.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:01 PM
11

You'd have to define east & oppression first they're both way too broad.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 11:33 AM
5

gender pay gap is bullshit, uncontrolled is like 83c and the controlled pay gap is 99c basically they just don’t want to say it’s 100c. The controls that you mention explain the reasons for the wage gap but they are all a choice and one gender overwhelmingly chooses not to do them which makes it a gender gap. Could also be a lazy gap I guess, I've never checked for that. ;-)
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:48 AM
-5

Feminists have only tried to redefine how patriarchy works and extended it to government they've never denied it's existence. What the rich do is irrelevant to whether a wage gap exists. Mate, that's a lot of big words just to admit that both the Patriarchy and the Wage Gap do exist and therefore your previous statements were incorrect.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:42 AM
0

There is no such thing as a patriarchy, everyone is oppressed. Patriarchy sees the father as the head of the home, responsible for the conduct and well being of his family. It's about responsibility not oppression. There isn't a gender pay gap. All the data showing women earning <x> cents in the dollar compared to men isn't made up and it is based on gender. And until we realise who the real enemy is, we're just... You're referring to the rich right? If so then absolutely true.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:01 AM
30

Patriarchy used to be the common family structure, still common among some religious groups. Gender Pay Gap is real but it's caused by women not men. Otherwise nope, not a one. EDIT: Oh, and it's feminism targeting a number of female biological traits with very succesful propaganda that has spread this stuff. Most feminists aren't misandrists they're just brain washed "useful idiots".
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:54 AM
4

I agree but it's hard/impossible to get to why without first determining who. The use of the Matrix Red & Blue is perfect, you either want to know or you don't. All the other pills seem to be variations of what to do with the knowledge and I think that they detract from the clear & concise message of Red & Blue. In the same way that the many additional phobias we now have, that have no relationship with the actual meaning of the word phobia, detract from the real phobias. Feminism totally relies…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:44 AM
1

Martians have landed in eastern Nebraska. The leader stated that they come in peace but will use force if provoked. Sooo, you'd not be concerned with the realness of the story but with whatever the Leader said.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:41 AM
6

It’s like this I love pizza but I hate buffalo chicken pizza. That's the exact opposite of what it is.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:29 AM
15

Yep, it's telling us that AskFem & TwoX et al exemplify virtue & honesty, while MGTOW was well y'know.. men. ;-)
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:23 AM
12

Well, that saved me watching it. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:16 AM
9

I meant the fuck lots of women subtype of Red Pill knowledge If Red Pill is knowledge then how does your sentence sound now? I've watched 100's of FnF videos and I've never once heard them say bang lots of women before marriage.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:13 AM
3

I agree but people that think red pill is pua are generally focused on women so I've only been using the "nature of women". I used to use "the world has lied to you about the true nature of women" but I tended to get arguments about "who lied" rather than the "about women" part.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 05:07 AM
13

The Red Pill is just knowledge. Take the red pill and be awakened to the real character nature of women, take the blue pill to stay in your current delusion and remain ignorant. Fresh'n'Fit etc use the knowledge to encourage better success with women. BetterBachelor etc use the knowledge to encourage avoidance of women. and no, they're not on the same side. Your "have in common" list is flawed. edit: wrong word.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:35 AM
6

Hey, Punder. Your comment to me "!00% spot on!" seems to be shadow banned. Shadow banning of innocuous comments in this sub seems to be increasing.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:27 AM
12

Well, yeah Janice is right but if they didn't use the woman card they'd just use politicans usual methods to deflect scrutiny & criticism. By playing the woman card they not only get to deflect but are also able to pander to a large % of their voters. So I guess they're actually just doing their job of misleading the public more efficiently.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:16 AM
9

Yes, capitialists like the Rockefellers own the politicans who pass laws to benefit them. Feminism supplies the sock puppets that supply the politicans with the excuses for the laws. Feminism is losing it's effectiveness and will be discarded soon enough, I think they're currently testing a few other possible replacements. Interesting video tho, I'll watch the rest of it later. Thanks.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:00 AM
7

I think that.... Tends to mean you used logic to arrive at your conclusion as opposed to "I feel like". Hence: "so following your 'logic'" to arrive at what you said not her. Punder just swapped the genders to see if your statement still worked, if it doesn't then your logic is wrong. Source: I know fucking everything not really living up to this mate. lol
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:47 AM
16

Well yes, because you're a lying deranged lunatic. They're just spreading the gospel. I don't know why you guys can't see this.. SMH
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:13 PM
6

A question, a piece of chocolate, 10 mins later the same question. Real life experiment on 10 females. Small sample to be sure but still: 100% - Two different answers.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:09 PM
21

+100 There are signs my ltr is coming to an end. MGTOW will be the way forward.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:03 PM
8

<shrug> Males are always held accountable and only other males can do it. Feminist slogans like this should just be ignored.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:00 PM
5

Maaate, she's a woman on her unique journey with her own truths. Think of her as a human not just a object. She might be a great cook, a terrific personality, <some other stuff>. It's sad that only thru luck you got my Top Of the List. lmao
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:55 PM
4

I refuse to believe someone might be so fucking stupid, there's no way. IDK mate, look at how smart the average person is... half the people are umm, less smart. It's probably written by an AI and... Yeah, I agree. Proof that ChatGPT isn't perfect or maybe they're just testing us for gullibility.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:43 PM
3

Write down 3+ possible reasons for dating this chick, list them in descending probability order, the top answer is probably right. I suspect it almost certainly won't be marriage. ;-)
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:40 PM
16

<shrug> it's just proof that chatgpt isn't perfect yet.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:34 PM
3

How long the column has been around and repeating the advertising for it doesn't make a story real.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:32 PM
12

;-) <--- irl lock eyes as well. edit: NO words, nothin, nada, anything just makes you look weak to them and they'll "feel like" they got under your skin.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 12:58 PM
5

so don’t you come here and say that this isn’t the case when you can just simply... that's as far as I got, gfy with your giving orders.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 12:00 PM
1

Be careful tho mate, women are women everywhere it's the society that restricts the behaviour we're now seeing in the west. It's creeping it's way across the globe.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:30 AM
21

Why the fk would a MensRights sub give a shit about mr beast or what you want? maybe try askmen.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:11 AM
8

Personal experience is irrelevant & stastically insignificant. You were viciously mauled by a dog does NOT mean all dogs will viciously maul you.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:12 AM
3

Yrs ago I stopped doing data analysis because of the growing trend of being handed the data and the resuts req'd. can't imagine it's gotten better. ;-)
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:42 AM
1

So does advertising & politicians. If it works it gets used.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:21 AM
1

On one hand I really hope you never have to test this. On the other hand I'd really like to see if this works. Smart move tho mate, just having the piece of paper may discourage the need for having it.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:19 AM
19

Men aren't smarter enough to fight for it.... <sigh> SMH "Social media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face" - Mike Tyson
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:11 AM
14

I know the research around this. Women generally are less aggressive... Women are more violent, men are better at being violent. So men generally do more damage. Your anecdotal experiences show this also. I woud appreciate it if you could point me at any research that could prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:29 AM
26

If you hit one back they will scream that you hit them, always oblivious to the fact that they hit first. It just doesn't register.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:24 AM
2

LOL
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:58 PM
5

Men are just weird for not jumping at that offer! She is the table after all... ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:31 PM
55

Company does a Bud Light, suffers Bud Light consequences. More news at 11. LMAO
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:30 PM
2

<shrug> What you think is irrelevant. Your understanding is not required for it to be true.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:26 PM
6

Yeah the drive for male attention & validation is very strong. to force guys to be a stay at home dads for a year. yeah, I've done it. Beach or park by 11am almost daily. lol Hard to imagine why the most emotional gender struggles with practical things.. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:49 PM
4

and then "Where have all the good men gone".. lol
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:46 PM
10

If my SO said he would want to hook up with hotter women but settle with me I’d also be upset. But she said she wants to marry him over just fucking. If "hook up" is the same as "just fucking" then how are these things different. You're extremely lucky that cognitive dissonance isn't explosive.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:40 PM
9

You accept without understanding how almost every appliance/object in your life works but somehow can't with men. If we wanted a feminine pov we'd be in a female sub.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:25 PM
2

Mate, the zoo trips are just a fantasy, I mean it's not like the whole massive daytime Soapie drama, Oprah etc industry was built on houswives with time to spare. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:22 PM
6

amazin bravado from a guy that doesn't know why this sub generally opposes marriage. lol
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:15 PM
5

bullshit, see my other comment
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:14 PM
12

Typical feminist NPC dribble.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:10 PM
4

To understand something one has to listen, think about it and ask questions for clarification. Ones opinions and feelings about the matter are totally irrelevant. Insulting the people with the information you're trying to understand is so counter productive that no sane rational person does it. Oh and you asked "What the fuck is this subreddit.", it's a place for men to discuss stuff. Arrogant and entitled busy-bees telling us we're wrong are pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:09 PM
18

Women will always tell on themselves. - MHD Alcohol speeds it up.. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:01 PM
4

<shrug> Go try and let us know then.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:57 PM
66

but don't worry I do love you... ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:57 AM
30

jaded and broke
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:56 AM
85

LOL, she should be packing not panicking. They seriously believe we're the same. SMH
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:34 AM
2

I'm dumb and know nothing but complaining. I'm almost certainly emotional damaged since I'm apparently screaming at you for no reason. Since noone will care I won't bother the world with that but I will hasten to tell my 2 adult daughters so that they may better guard against my influence. Engaging with your towering intellect is truly a humbling experience. Again, many thanks for your wise words
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:31 AM
1

False allegations and/or the threat of don't drive men out of the education system they're just lazy. False allegations and/or the threat of don't drive men out of the legal system they're just lazy. The despicable discrimination that is quotas being applied everywhere with air-con from boardrooms to STEM don't drive men out, they're just lazy. I shall let men know of your wise words, it truly is a pleasure to have you here, many thanks.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:57 AM
3

Mate, I just pointed out that Nixon wasn't a big hero like your comment seemed to indicate. Hmmmm, you seem to want my opinion on current times, ok. If I was american I'd vote for this guy; Congressman Wesley Hunt reveals in a tense meeting with Taliban leaders, Trump declared, “I want to leave Afghanistan, but it’s going to be a conditions-based withdrawal,” before issuing a stark warning. “If you harm a hair on a single American, I’m going to kill you,” Trump said. The translator conveyed this…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:49 AM
3

Nixon ended the enforcement of a draft for the Vietnam War iirc about a month before it would have expired anyway. So basically a publicity stunt. US males must still register for the draft and can be forced to served at any time.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:24 AM
2

No no no, I'm pretty sure there was one that I rememb... oh you said almost... whoops sorry. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:14 AM
3

Once a chad is captured he is no longer a chad. Now he's just a trophy to parade before her friends until the shine dulls and a new shinier one is found.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 10:00 AM
7

If it's true then no "ist" matters. and yes, crazy is an apt description. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 09:00 AM
5

We don't live in a gynocentric society we live in a plutocracy. Those in power don't give a toss about either gender below their level. Feminism has only exploded due to the patronage of people like the Rockefellers. Fkn feminism is only concerned with women that adhere to the ideology, all others should be burn at the stake or somesuch.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:40 AM
2

Your comments and links are always excellent. Thank You.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:21 AM
2

Damn stupid mistake, I just had pink tax in the woke crap pile. Thanks, I'll reassess.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:39 AM
20

They're companies so with very few restrictions they're free to write and enforce whatever they like. Vote with your wallet, influence with your words & actions. Ask potential dates what they think of awdtsg/feminism etc, if a positive response then sorry bye & walk away. Withdraw your attention from companies & people that don't meet your standards.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:34 AM
6

Thanks for the advice I'll remember it for later. I just qualified as an astronaut so I'm a bit busy rn.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:20 AM
1

It looks like declining dividends and the resulting bitchin and/or lawsuits from shareholders is starting to kill off the whole dei/woke bullshit. Weird that I've never seen a big uptick in divs from implementing dei etc. ;-) I'm not sure but it might be a bit late too take that gamble anymore but I gotta say shorting Bud was ummm, pleasant.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:08 AM
1

Yep, it's not like animals have never professed to be the other gender to idk, go to female prisons. The first lawsuit by a transfemale denied a seat should be interesting. but the marketing dept said it's a great idea so y'know... and bud light was sooooo long ago. ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:39 AM
1

The whole equality stuff is propaganda designed to divide us. In any discussion about the genders the word equal by itself is useless.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:32 AM
4

when some women realised how difficult, gruelling, and unrewarding being part of a workforce is. So we should still punish women that realise they've been lied to by feminism & co? Isn't that a bit counter productive?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:19 AM
6

If A AND B THEN C NOT C THEN A NAND B. fkn nerds.. ;-) oh, and excellent post mate, nailed it.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:59 AM
6

I don't see how this is relevant to my comment??
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:51 AM
1

1 comment here = 1 comment elsewhere
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:48 AM
11

Think about what type of people would use this. This will help keep men safe, hilarious that that's the exact opposite of it's intention.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:31 AM
7

A paywalled article that starts with: OPINION GUEST ESSAY A report headed: Administrative data deficiencies plague understanding of the magnitude with a conclusion that includes: highlighted significant issues in data quality Do you even glance at stuff before you use it as proof.. SMH
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:23 AM
11

Drizzle Drizzle ;-)
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:15 AM
4

Their use of the word entitled is just projection, sex is just the currency they think feel like men use. edit: clarification
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:14 AM
34

You're missing a fundamental truth. Women don't verbalise their problems to encourage solutions like men do, they just want you to listen as they release their accumulated emotional baggage. When among other women they have to exagerate their problems to be heard. and when they say heard they mean attention. ;-) M & F be different mate.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:11 AM
4

What we need, conceptually, is to bring topics like this up on other social media platforms and ask the direct question "Why does Reddit allow discrimination against men?" What has been the reponse to you doing that?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:59 AM
1

Yep, all true. The only difference this time is they're trying to do it to their own people rather than some other group. Utilising the weakest gender to "put down" the strongest will be interesting to see.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:57 AM
4

lol yeah, the same as starting with "I'll be honest with you" etc
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:37 AM
4

I wonder if the downvotes are because they get your joke or because they don't.. lol
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:34 AM
1

A wall of text with no links, i suppose trying to disprove my comment. This is standard feminist emotional rant format. Hard pass.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:21 AM
2

Totally agree, it's an excellent motivational & educational expression. Being the boss is like having a baby, no one who hasn't done it can understand it.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:55 PM
1

MGTOW
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:41 PM
2

Reddit is the place nuance goes to die.. ;-)
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:14 PM
4

most likely to inflict injury... Really? inflict injury is the new definition of physical abuse? Women are more violent, men are better at it. edit. spelling
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:08 PM
3

ummm, is wrapped a typo of warped? really really different meanings..
/r/MensRights07/08/24 01:47 PM
2

ahh ok, makes sense. but wouldn't that mean that the OP doesn't get notified and may not notice your post?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:32 AM
2

sooo, would this be "a whoops I replied to the wrong comment".. lol
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:03 AM
1

yes, we know ;-)
/r/MensRights07/08/24 09:41 AM
5

For the sake of my sanity... <shrug> It was a really simple t/f question. If you can't emotionally handle a little pushback then you probably shouldn't post in this sub.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:12 AM
2

You said "polygamy is so rare", it isn't, 25% of the world isn't rare. I've never said that polygamy doesn't lead to revolution/civil war. I basically said that the few don't give a shit because there is effectively 0% chance in the west that they will ever be held to account in 2024.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:00 AM
4

Your fist study was on a very small group and concludes that "a larger sample size and better ability to control for socioeconomic variables is warranted." This is inconclusive. True or False?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:43 AM
3

Mate that's just an emotional rant that doesn't address anything that I said. I'll reiterate my points and I'll be happy to address your rebuttals. 1- It has generally been agreed that the words Men or Women refers to 60-80% of the gender referred to. Are you really suggesting 60-80% of men are "so violent"? 2- Your fist study was on a very small group and concludes that "a larger sample size and better ability to control for socioeconomic variables is warranted." 3- Your second study is on the …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:31 AM
41

Different genders, different triggers, different marketing strategies. Extract the max possible out of everyone. Mate, that's capitialism 101. lol Obviously you spent a lot of time and effort and it's really interesting. Thank You.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:05 AM
5

Why are men so violent? It has generally been agreed that the words Men or Women refers to 60-80% of the gender referred to. Are you really suggesting 60-80% of men are "so violent"? You seem very sure of your opinion but I think it's misplaced. Your fist study was on a very small group and concludes that "a larger sample size and better ability to control for socioeconomic variables is warranted." Your second study is on the likelihood of PTSD in Filipino boys 8-16 being circumcised and nowhere…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:49 AM
2

Yeah, australian politicans watched in awe as canada dealt with the Truckers Blockade. SMH, bloody canucks giving our politicans ideas...
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:11 AM
5

There have been very few revolutions where the few were actually held to account. In 2024 the few will not be sitting in their NY houses while the rioters burn the joint down, they'll be in Majorca or somewhere while their sock puppets deal with the plebs. why polygamy is so rare. "The legal status of polygamy varies widely around the world. Polygyny is legal in 58 out of nearly 200 sovereign states, the vast majority of them being Muslim-majority countries." So roughly 25% of the world, hardly …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:07 AM
23

It completely incentivizes women to become predatory parasites. Yes, which destroys the family unit, which gives men little/no reason to fight against tyranny. So working as intended. Divide and conqueror has always been the sop for the few to control the many.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 03:09 AM
3

Living together creating a Defacto or Common Law wife is common in most/all 1st world countries. AFAIK only canada has a "not living together is still a Common Law wife" attitude. One of the few areas where canada is a bigger feminist cesspit than australia. ;-)
/r/MensRights07/08/24 03:05 AM
13

Hard to argue against that in the current environment.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:55 AM
11

Unmarried Ontario couple had no children and no house but man must still pay support, appeal court rules. In Ontario, being common-law spouses doesn't necessarily mean having lived in the same home, the court found
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:16 AM
2

Really? you found logic in that idiotic statement? ok, I'll look again but I'm pretty sure... ;-)
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:11 AM
8

And as we know, prenups work just fine. lol. I agree with your "lol", that is a funny statement.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:05 AM
4

Often the problem with that channel. lol
/r/MensRights07/08/24 01:14 AM
3

ok, thanks for the advice.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:29 PM
4

MGTOWs also use divorce stats as part of their talking points, so what. You really should google "propaganda" That's a nonsensical sentence. Thanks, I've long wondered what MRM meant.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:25 PM
4

Yeah, I feel for you young guys today. Learn all you can about female nature and then tread carefully if you venture in the jungle of dating 2024.. ;-) Mostly just hang in there and try to stay safe, I think the world will be much different in 10ish yrs.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:16 PM
9

MGTOW values aren't based on the 80/20. Psychological studies aren't propaganda. Men are best helped by giving then truth. MRM has no "politically" anything.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:05 PM
13

OkCupid & Tinder weren't really studies, more a reporting of data collected from swipes. The "every other study ever" I mentioned refers to a number of psychological studies done across countries & cultures, the same numbers are reflected everywhere. I've no idea why you think I'm alone.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:56 PM
3

If 80%+ of women want you then yes, if not then no. Your gf could be in the other 20% of women.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:50 PM
20

No, women want the top 10-20% of guys. They will happily go on a foodie date with almost anyone or have placeholder relationship while waiting to monkey branch to a better guy. Google the words in italics or "Female hypergamy" for way more info.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:41 PM
30

Well you're right that OkCupid reported the 80/20 but the OP provided a link to a Tinder study which also reports 80/20. So it's actually a true statistic OkCupid & Tinder. Also every other study ever.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:29 PM
22

thank you
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:15 PM
35

<shrug> This is not new information. Female hypergamy is a well known trait.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:09 PM
1

Holy shit, you watched all of that!! Mate, I can't afford the loss of IQ pts that would cause. Best wishes on a speedy recovery.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:37 PM
1

I await your solution with bated breath. Your answers to the 4 questions I asked Current_Finding would also be appreciated.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:58 AM
0

from the australian 1800respect.org.au Psychological abuse: It involves someone saying or doing things to make you feel bad. I would be interested in your answers to the 4 questions I originally asked and, if you don't mind, your opinion on how this is "detrimental to men" as you first stated. Who overwhelmingly does the "psychological abuse, taunting, etc."? Who overwhelmingly is the first to "physically touch the other"? Who overwhelmingly instantly lies about being the first to get physical? …
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:42 AM
1

Bullshit. What got I here is ignoring that one gender can be abusive at all. Abuse is abuse and should be dealt with. Psychological abuse is basically hurt feelings, how would you suggest dealing that? and you really should give a bit more thought to the outcome of my previous comment.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:24 AM
1

Who overwhelmingly does the "psychological abuse, taunting, etc."? Who overwhelmingly is the first to "physically touch the other"? edit: Who overwhelmingly instantly lies about being the first to get physical? Therefore who will mostly end up in jail?
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:06 AM
5

I can't seem to find the dv report but IIRC indigenous females were 17 times more likely to be victims than non-indigenous. For context the latest homicide report states; Homicide Offenders - indigenous - Male - 17.13 per 100,000 Homicide Offenders - non indigin - Male - 01.39 per 100,000 Homicide Offenders - indigenous - FeMale - 3.33 per 100,000 Homicide Offenders - non indigin - FeMale - 0.79 per 100,000 Page 35, Table 30 - Homicide in Australia 2022–23 So I guess the billions poured into ind…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:33 AM
10

Just a propoganda piece justifying more funding. DV is easy to stop. The first person to physically touch the other gets 5yrs. If it can be proven that that person knowingly lied about who hit first they get another 5yrs. The courts are a bit clogged so prob 3mths after the first jailing dv will disappear. but that would stop the gravy train that is the dv industry in the "Land of the Fair Go"..
/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:40 PM
6

She's a woman first
/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:32 PM
2

It's just the feminist machine working as intended mate. Feminism is starting to crack, it'll be gone soon enough.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 10:00 PM
6

SMH, ya fkn animal... LMAO
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:10 PM
3

lol and my response to his confession in this branch is gone too.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:01 PM
3

yep, this is how they'll drive us out. Let the dipshits run free and silence us.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:54 PM
2

Log out and have a look at your comment history, in this post.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:46 PM
1

what does TBH mean?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:34 PM
57

You were a 17 yr old male just 3 mths ago. Now you're a grown woman.. what's that about? Your post history; 3 mths ago - So I(M17) think I have no other option but to leave. 10 mths ago - I(16m) feel like my mom hates me.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:26 PM
2

But I'd guess it is because women studying and working is relatively new at a cultural level (a century is not that much). 10 seconds with google can prove how inaccurate that statement is. Women have always worked. Women have long been educated.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 12:56 PM
2

I don't know enough to answer that. Then how do you know that there is a bias?, could it not be that women just don't want to do these jobs. After all despite years of quotas universities still can't seem to get enough females into stem. The type of people that inhabit boardrooms care about nothing but money and power. They have happily slowly killed their customers with tobacco, asbestos, pesticides etc. They care nothing about gender/race/religion or any of the isms. and anyway only a miniscul…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 12:48 PM
3

I'm short on time right now so just a quick question and I'll respond later. Why is there a bias against women in STEM, Boardrooms or Politics?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:18 AM
3

LOL, then you missed by a long way. Maybe lookup what objective means.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 10:46 AM
2

Is that anecdotal? Yes, all so called studies in this area are just collections of anecdotal data. Feminists love these and use bias in who they collect the data from. No one has to remember what they're running low on they just put it on the damn list or wander around the house for 5 mins making a list before they go shopping. This stuff isn't rocket science. Hardly surprising that the least logical gender has a struggle with logical things.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 10:19 AM
2

Why? they're both personal experience and therefore irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 08:37 AM
1

All true. I've no idea how it relates to my comment tho.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 08:29 AM
0

How is that connected to my comment?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:16 AM
1

Why do you insist on assigning feelings to everything I say? I was merely trying to draw attention to the lack of potential positive impact your original comment had - on the off chance it could improve things on the sub. I see no benefit in praising someone when they say/do stupid stuff. If someone says the sky is green are they more likely to reevaluate their opinion if I say they're smart or if I laugh and call them an idiot?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:13 AM
7

always amazes me. Somehow pushing a lawn mower isn't a chore but pushing a vacuum is.. lol
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:22 AM
0

Since you didn't voice an opinion what am I upset about? and I have no idea what "axe" I'm apparently grinding so maybe you could elaborate on that as well... or, did you not actually think about your comment before you posted it...
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:16 AM
7

Feminism (by its definition) wants equal rights,... Who argues for Quotas in STEM? Boardrooms? Politics? Quotas are discrimination not equality. You're being brain washed by the advertising. Also name ONE right that men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:08 AM
4

It doesn't. You shouldn't assume it's the mra guys that are doing it. It could be but there's plenty of feminists and bots passing thru here.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:02 AM
0

<sigh> another one... How about if you think about your comment and come up with a few possible answers to it, then we can discuss which one is more likely to be right. Capitialism is terrible for the majority of people, socialism is even worse. So that makes sociialists what, smart?
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:58 AM
0

I'm not american. The United Nations is one of the premier feminist organisations on the planet. Perception is subjective. Your Personal Experience is irrelevant, try being objective.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:31 AM
7

Men and women are different so there will always be "double standards" like the dress/appearance ones you mentioned. The idiotic and often dangerous changing of minimum requirements is a different ball game. The minimum requirements to do a job are there to enable the job to be done at at least a min std and shouldn't be changed for anyone. Who knows tho I’m only 16 so maybe I’m overreacting… <shrug> why does it matter? If you're not happy with a situation remove yourself from it if possible. Ju…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:22 AM
3

women have lower disgust thresholds.. True but only explains why she thinks the floor is dirty and he doesn't not the "mental load" stuff. We're all driven by our biological programming, arguably all of our current societal problems stem from society changing much faster than our biology can adapt.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:07 AM
-3

my socialist self... That's hilarious. You label yourself an idiot and then suggest others should "think"... LMAO
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:55 AM
76

Have you seen The Red Pill doco? "When feminist filmmaker Cassie Jaye sets out to document the mysterious and polarizing world of the Men's Rights Movement, she begins to question her own beliefs. Jaye had only heard about the Men's Rights Movement as being a misogynist hate-group aiming to turn back the clock on women's rights, but when she spends a year filming the leaders and followers within the movement, she learns the various ways men are disadvantaged and discriminated against."
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:32 AM
8

MRA argues for equality of opportunity. Feminism argues for equality of outcome. They cannot coexist. American feminism has taken a bad turn... Rubbish, feminism has always been a despicable ideology. The only "changes" have been in the advertising. Read the SCUM Manifesto and then explore how long that idea has been expoused by feminists.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:26 AM
34

pro-male, argues/wants male rights not anti-male, not for or against men just doesn't care I have never seen anyone here arguing for men to have more rights than women. The idea of a blanket "superior sex" is idiotic. We are different and have different strengths.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:09 AM
15

Ok, so I started scrolling thru your 2 links but stopped at.. Feminists call this... In her book "Liberees", French feminist... that tells me all I need thanks. They've either cherry picked data or outright made shit up to suit their agenda. Feminism cannot exist without bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:50 PM
1

but oftentimes it’s a mean spirited distraction. I'd have to see an example of that but it's seems subjective.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:46 PM
4

or cares. I'll never get it either.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:57 PM
43

They can't be real examples of mental load, surely? Does the dishwasher need unloading? omg, the mental strain... LMAO Just more victimhood bullshit. Laugh loudly and ignore, it'll go away.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:54 PM
14

Well I'm fuckin devastated.. ;-)
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:18 PM
2

I was referring to you using my profession as a jab at my character.... Oh ffs, I've known way smarter & older people that you that for any number of reasons were doing far shittier jobs than yours including myself. I don't give a shit what your job is, only that yours is a good indicator of youth. The % of shift leaders that are over 25 is roughly equivalent to fk all. I agree, age is not a gaurantee of being wise BUT you cannot be wise without the years to gain experience & knowledge. You know…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:37 PM
0

Given how much and how widely.... yeah, maybe... The only thing I'm more sure of every day is how little I know. The amount of stuff I don't know is exponentially outgrowing my ability to learn stuff.. every. damn. day! lol When OP and many of the commenters limit this insight into just feminists, it’s a tell of their bias.... Could be but we do constantly discuss feminism and its impacts so maybe rather than bias it could just be the main subject matter of this sub and the OP hasn't really cons…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:15 PM
2

But my profession does not define my beliefs or personality or education... No, but it indicates your age, which indicates how long you have had to learn. No matter how intelligent someone is they can't learn much in a short period of time and experience ONLY comes with time. Time that you haven't had much of. have a history of attacking people... lol, I called you "puppy" that's hardly and attack certainly not when compared to your comment that I responded to. What you should take to heart is t…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:02 PM
3

Oh please, "roast you" lol I checked your profile to see who was passing judgement and giving us orders. You should check a dictionary before you use big words like "reiterate".
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:07 PM
3

LOL, says a shift lead at McDonalds. Thanks for your advice puppy, off you go now.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:29 AM
3

Someone once said "Victimhood is a wonderful way to stay completely self absorbed and not feel guilty about it" ;-)
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:14 AM
38

It applies to any ideologue not just feminists. Also true of opinions, people in general have a problem with being shown they're wrong about almost anything. Probably more about self worth than identity tho I might be just splitting hairs. ;-) why debating feminists turns.. Why on earth would you do this? Engaging is an absolute total waste of your time mate. Laugh loudly as you wander away. A feminist is either; - A total POS, the ones that have a position of influence. Delusional dimwits, the …
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:35 AM
5

The Aus/Uk & US National Football teams have all lost to 15yr old boys in their respective countries. Men have certainly started watching the WNBA games that Caitlin Clark plays in.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 04:24 AM
5

Sooooo, basically a solid loser?? ;-) Pretty sad what we're flexin on. lmao
/r/MensRights04/08/24 03:19 AM
4

The data set being used is to small to determine anything. Using the same data set from previous Olympics may indicate some pattern but even then there really hasn't been enough Olympics for any worth while analysis. This time the girls did good and the boys didn't <shrug>.. oh and please don't group "NZ/Aus/Can" together, Aus is 1st in the Feminist Shithole Event, by a long way. ;-)
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:41 AM
8

google "Cassidy Boon drowning" smh, arrogant fkn dimwit.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:04 AM
8

pretty sure that turned out to be a skit.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:27 AM
12

Not a joke Seriously?? okay then... Women have always been able to get a job. Single women could always have their own credit card, married women couldn't because their husband was responsible for her debt. Men didn't have the right to vote either until they said "Fk you we're not fighting your wars until we do" and as a condition of being able to vote they agreed to serving in the military and firefighting. Women in the US could have voted 40? yrs earlier if they had agreed to the same conditio…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 12:09 PM
8

Feminism has had a massive positive impact on the world. LMAO.... good one..
/r/MensRights03/08/24 11:44 AM
13

yep, welcome to the red pill mate.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:53 AM
217

“of course I’m depressed, I’m attracted to men” that aren't attracted to me. ;-)
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:19 AM
2

The Conversation has become a feminist cesspit. It used to actually live up to its motto "Academic rigour, journalistic flair".
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:34 AM
-4

Kamala are very smart people. lmao
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:20 AM
5

May my words embolden you to confront your destiny at this juncture in life. lol, I can hear that ringing out across the football field as coaches everywhere use it to encourage players to ignore their ouchies and get back in the game... fkn hilarious mate, thank you... lmao
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:17 AM
32

yep, feminism had to kill the "Man Up" and it's close sibling "Real Man". There can be no encouragement for boys to become masculine men. Masculine men are the only danger to feminism and its masters.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:14 AM
7

He's applying your logic to a similar situation, usually done to test the validity of your logic. If your answer is not the same to the similar situation then the logic you used and therefore your answer/opinion is wrong. We all know how to walk/run/swim but if we want to become better we need to learn how. What have you done to learn how to think? https://brilliant.org/courses/logic-deduction/
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:03 AM
-6

+100
/r/MensRights02/08/24 11:36 PM
2

Says no politician or advertising executive ever!
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:51 PM
4

/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:19 AM
3

you funny...
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:40 PM
3

feminism is about equality Still funny.. lol
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:54 PM
1

You apparently can't see the sarcasm dripping off that last sentence but I'm the dumbass.. lol
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:38 PM
22

Sooooo, why are so many women bitchin about Passport Bros & MGTOW guys.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 10:10 AM
5

always say shit about the Pay Gap, what the hell is that?? The fight against this imaginary dragon will forever supply cushy jobs for mostly women. The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) Our Team page shows 9 people. 7 women & 2 IT guys... They just want equality...
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:49 AM
2

but First Nation maybe the best of a bad bunch I cannot believe that I agree... SMH
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:28 AM
-2

The dreams won't be so vivid if you sleep with your hands under yor pillow.. ;-)
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:27 AM
3

Tim Richardson will become Parliamentary Secretary for Men’s Behaviour Change, continuing the Allan Labor Government’s priority to make Victoria a safer place for women and children and work to end the tragedy of deaths of Victorian women at the hands of men. You mean like this Labor...
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:24 AM
22

+100 Nicely put..
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:20 AM
26

caught themselves in a cognitive dissonance loop This causes them no pain.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:18 AM
35

enough man power lol
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:43 AM
1

wtf!! Hard pass from me. and anyway a much worse punishment will be the 40+yrs of only having cats for validation.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:27 PM
8

Yes, our society has changed much much faster than our biology can.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 12:24 PM
28

Selfish Woman Explains Why 50% Women Have a Back Up Man in Case Their Current Relationship Fails
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:33 AM
1

LOL, can't refute anything I said so you go immediately to playing the victim and the "who hurt you" dribble. Very typical young feminist npc.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 10:48 AM
-1

I'm not sure how to help you... maybe therapy??
/r/MensRights28/07/24 07:16 AM
8

I Feel like Feminism is Turning Men into Whiny Bitches LOL
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:43 AM
3

Ah, okay gotcha. Those times are over. I simply can't anymore. +100
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:15 AM
1

Less provocative clothing means less likely to attract the attention of a pos animal. The same hissy fits were thrown in australia when a senior officier suggested that women should stay with their friends rather than wander off alone. Both are reasonable suggestions. and since when has statistics ever stopped hissy fits. lmao but I really... We're talking about women not A womAn. The world doesn't revolve around you. have an equal relationship.. There is no such thing. an equal relationship, wh…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 04:46 AM
12

Excellent, so you're happy with the double standards, good for you.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:51 AM
7

That explains the "celebrity" occurances but it doesn't explain the female teacher/boy student problem.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:48 AM
15

but the less I care for women I noticed the more they care for me. They don't "care" for you they just want the ego boost/validation from getting you to want them personally. Once you care for her she'll move on.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 01:41 AM
2

Biology drives behavior.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 04:39 PM
3

Yep.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 03:44 PM
11

But shouldn't feminists be against the infantilization of adult women? Fkn Feminists don't give a toss about women. What FF say to manipulate women into joining their despicable cult is far from what they actually do.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 01:04 PM
2

Because of misandry biology.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 12:56 PM
10

Anyways. Fuck feminism I'm off to change my email signature, thanks.. LMAO
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:22 PM
18

about that professional women's soccer team loosing to 15 year old boys It wasn't just one.. USA, Britian & Australia.. LMAO
/r/MensRights26/07/24 03:02 PM
16

never ending work.. LOL
/r/MensRights26/07/24 03:01 PM
14

shadow banned comments
/r/MensRights26/07/24 02:59 PM
2

I bow before your truly astounding intellect.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 10:59 AM
4

Yep, American Airlines as well. Some pushback seems to be starting tho. Conservative group takes aim at DEI policies of 3 major airlines.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 10:56 AM
8

for the sake of inclusion and diversity, no doubt. Ever noticed how these dei dipshits never allow diversity of opinions.. LOL
/r/MensRights25/07/24 03:27 AM
12

I don't give a flying fk about anything other than who is best for the job.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:56 AM
9

So you are against diversity, equity, and inclusion.. Yep, it's blatant discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:47 AM
23

Hard to put an exact time line on finding something that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:32 AM
1

Want whatever you like for any reason. The Dipshits saying it's hypocritical should consider that men and women are different and want different things for different reasons. They should also get a fkn dictionary. There are any nunmber of psychological studies showing that a female with a high BC is a bad long term relationship risk.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:18 AM
62

LMAO Crowdstrike shareholders will learn like Boeings have. The end of dei is nigh.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 09:14 PM
0

on the books that prevent or force men... try again
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:24 AM
7

idgaf
/r/MensRights23/07/24 12:25 PM
3

Both You believe that gender equality DOES NOT exist and that gender equality DOES exist. Is everything clear now? yes, thank you
/r/MensRights23/07/24 05:33 AM
2

1- If there is a majority and a minority then equality DOES NOT exist. 2- If you can't name one right that a gender has that the other doesn't then equality DOES exist. You said 1, I said 2... what were you agreeing with?
/r/MensRights23/07/24 05:10 AM
4

I agree with this How, when you originally said; in terms of gender equality women are in the minority. Which in my opinion, is true. Men are in the majority.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:59 AM
1

SMH... fkn "gender equality", it's defined as a situation in which access to rights or opportunities is unaffected by gender. Name one "right or opportunity" that men have that women don't that is solely based on their gender! Until one is actually found just walk away from any dipshit that bitches about it.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:28 AM
0

Women should have body autonomy.. Men don't so why should women? The problem with the whole abortion argument is that no one can agree on when the baby is an actual human with it's own right to life. The "right" to abortion will change depending on who is in power.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:09 AM
2

feminism by definition promotes equality.. That's the advertising, try looking at their actions.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:01 AM
2

Using "year after year after year" to refer to just 4 yrs is an example of "sensationalist bullshit" that you accused u/Gullible_Driver8487 of OR you have the "absolutely no literacy" that you also accused Gullible of.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 03:53 AM
3

Not to mention democrats have consistently won the popular vote year after year after year For the last 4 elections.. Major goal post adjustment there..
/r/MensRights23/07/24 03:16 AM
7

an important healthcare procedure LOL
/r/MensRights23/07/24 03:03 AM
2

https://archive.org/details/the-manipulated-man_202201
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:01 PM
4

Not living with your parents has only recently become a thing and really only in western cultures. Hugely beneficial for the individual and society at large for intergenerational families to cohabitate.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 08:14 AM
-1

claiming that he has enough knowledge of a specific field to recognize who is/isn't in that field.. He has no knowledge of the quotas universities or companies use... You have no way of knowing. and therefore claims of expertise aren't valid.. No, YOUR claim of expertise is invalidated by YOUR display of a total lack of critical thinking. Is my rebuttal of your statement on Ideas wrong? Healthcare? Brilliant.org? The Alone v The Island? I pointed out the errors in your last comment none of which…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 07:41 AM
-5

if a woman can hold the top position in the u.s. Soooo, the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:42 AM
1

I suspect there could be a bit of a surprise this time around..
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:41 AM
1

...damsels in distress preyed upon by evil human traffickers who need.... A miniscule number of men are human traffickers so this doesn't display misandry or xenophobia at all.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:37 AM
7

lol, I haven't seen/heard anyone mention Usenet in ages, you're showing your age there mate.... oh wait... :-)
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:34 AM
-1

Ok, so just for future passerbys. How are you defining "built/maintained.... Ideas are irrelevant unless someone builds and then maintains whatever it was about. The "idea" of going to Mars has been around for ages and then one day a guy like Musk appears and starts actually doing it. Name a female Musk. Healthcare isn't essential for society it just prolongs the life of individual people not society itself. No healthcare only means less people at any given time NOT no people at all. No childcar…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:11 AM
2

Not ONE example of something built or maintained by women. A truly pathetic example of critical thinking for someone that claims to be a software engineer. You seriously think if all women just vanished, society would continue functioning? Go watch "The Island with Bear Grylls" and you'll have the answer, tho probably pointless unless you learn to think first. See Brilliant.org for some excellent courses.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:11 AM
2

women are never forced to pay child support, bullshit I don't know who gave you the right to decide whether this is not related to men's rights or not... He never claimed to have the "right", he rightly pointed out it's an inappropriate post. also idiotic. also stop doing targeted downvoting. SMH, maybe you'd fit better in KidsRights.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:37 AM
1

"Everyone was built by men" is just factually incorrect... I suppose you could easily name a few things built and/or maintained by women then eh.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:38 AM
0

Begone you weirdo with your strange concept of 2 adults allocating tasks in a manner that they find acceptable.. ;-)
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:40 AM
1

This woman made her boyfriend.... LOL
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:39 AM
2

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:09 AM
4

Mate, the "troll" has been here before with her essays of kaka, just a dimwit that's not worth engaging with. She could easily be the chick in the OP's link. ;-) oh, and the link isn't in your other comment.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:27 PM
4

they will get frustrated because they may *not be informed * about a topic and just start shouting... but still right.. lol
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:25 PM
10

Firstly, everyone but EVERYONE argues/debates from an emotional state. rubbish.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:35 AM
10

as I stopped to care.. This is the way. Laugh loudly and wander off always ensuring that your Field of Fucks To Give is bare.. lol
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:31 AM
1

Mate, this isn't true at all. The small number of influental ones at the top that know exactly what they're doing - Yes, despicable fkn pos. The ones we generally get in here shouting "it's about equality" - No, they're just deluded dimwits.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:04 AM
2

Yes, there are statistical differences between the genders. Are there biological differences between the genders?
/r/MensRights16/07/24 10:25 AM
11

I just skimmed a few pages about mens subject. I saw no Rational anywhere...
/r/MensRights16/07/24 09:33 AM
13

It won't last very long. Shareholders don't give a flying fk about anything but profit. DEI hires drive performance and therefore profitability down. There will be a tipping point in every company when it starts to affect the bottom line and the idiocy will be ended.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 09:28 AM
2

it should be based on individual traits Language, math, critical thinking skills. Language, math etc are learnt abilities they aren't individual traits. Mate, I also said "should always be educated seperately", not just in higher education as viktarti suggested. Boys'n'girls are different and they learn differently. There is tons of info available about this, it isn't new. Study some biology & psychology, you could start by googling "do the genders learn differently".
/r/MensRights16/07/24 08:59 AM
3

Males/Females aren't that different from other Males/Females, ask any advertising executive. based on individual traits. Really, what traits? Eye color? Hair color? Height? SMH, honestly this is the dumbest comment I've ever seen on reddit...
/r/MensRights16/07/24 12:06 AM
17

I see this here in this group daily. Daily eh? Ya should be able to easily point to a few examples then wouldn't ya?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 11:36 PM
7

However, men who lose their ever loving shit and start making a scene and being utterly vile are quite common. I'd bet you have no stats to back that idiot statement up. Visitors from TwoX are just pathetic...
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:42 AM
5

Oh Look! two Drop In Dickheads at the same time!! as always complete with scare mongering cherry picked data, you clowns are pathetic. u/mismatched_dragonfly
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:12 AM
3

A+ for emotional rant, truly excellent work.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:55 AM
1

Well, since he made the distinction between Think & Know; Think, to have a opinion/belief or idea, Know - be aware of through observation, inquiry, or information. and called you a dimwit; Dimwit - a stupid or mentally slow person I'm pretty sure his reason is not what you just came up with... LOL
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:50 PM
3

I can't see anything he said that was wrong. If your point is so easy to run into the ground it wasn't much of a point.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 03:39 PM
4

I said Google it not look in AskFeminists. You had a quick look for something/anything to cast aspersions on whatever you don't like. For some reason you quote the second paragraph of an article referenced in AskFeminists, stick an insult on it and Hey Presto absolute proof that you're somehow right. Oh, look, here's why you skipped the First paragraph, it doesn't suit your pathetic agenda. Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass med…
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:49 PM
1

More profit & power. Google "How the Rockefellers re-engineered women."
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:47 PM
13

Nope, you connecting those two disparate things is dumb. just to save you looking... ;-) - disparate - essentially different in kind; not able to be compared
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:44 PM
2

Perfectly cancellable... lol
/r/MensRights31/01/24 12:09 AM
3

It's always been Protection & Provide. They used to have to try and get someone with a good balance of both. Now that the Provide bit is taken care of by supermarkets & them earning their own money they're free to only chase the bad boys that they instinctively think are the best protectors. Largely the Protection is carried out by society so they no longer even "feel" that they really need protection so the chase is on just for the bad boys..
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:45 PM
1

What's funny is subjective and so is irrelevant. This convo may actually be important to you, please stop with the trying to pick a fight rubbish. Sure, they aren’t same on physical. Are they the same emotionally?
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:17 AM
1

Are male & female the same?
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:09 AM
1

Oh, good grief, what is the Age of Consent Law based on? what drove it to be made Law? How does any govt determine the age? Morals and predatory are both subjective. Who are you to judge anyone else on either of those? Are the young women chasing DiCaprio predatory or is it only DiCaprio that can be cause he said yes to one of them.. How about you live according to your morals and I'll do the same but with my morals and we'll both obey our respective laws.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:47 PM
1

Yall used to have good conversations in here. <shrug> Then people like you starting rudely clomping in.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:18 PM
2

<shrug> ok, you go tell all the young hotties in Miami bangin old guys just to get on their boat or get access to their clout that they can't do that any more. There has to be a line, the line is drawn by whatever country, get over it.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:04 PM
2

Yes, so what? which is can be annoying huh?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:59 PM
1

After college I’ve no issues with an age gap. Well, so long as you have no issues with it I guess it's how it should me...
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:53 PM
2

What dribble, age is no guarantee of wisdom or discernment. You just can't have them without age.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:51 PM
6

a young guys gotta practice. Nothing is the same for men as it is for women. Men & Women be different.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:48 PM
3

incredibly boring and predictable sucks that you're being held here against your will.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 09:11 AM
3

You call us cowards for downvoting you and demand that we engage. When we do engage you call it a "fiasco" and insult us again because we don't agree with you. Since we don't agree with you we must be all idolizing Tate. SMH, yep we're the problem.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:32 PM
3

Yes, this is bullshit. FIFY and I agree.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:04 AM
6

This entire fiasco makes me question if I should stay on this sub, as so far I had considered it relatively level headed. There's 359,000 members here & who knows how many drop-ins. The idea that you consider the miniscule number of respondents to your post as indicative of the whole sub is laughable at best.. I guess the idea that YOU could be wrong has never occurred to you. It's really really sad that we're no longer living up to your standard of "relatively level headed"....
/r/MensRights26/01/24 07:59 AM
1

I don’t know how to quote Start the sentence with "> ", no quotes.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:32 AM
1

You still haven't shown me any sources that claim women get half of the man's stuff. It's a LEGAL matter, there are no studies. Go check court records. Google "what is the average divorce settlement". In Australia the first hit from a legal company said "On average, most divorce settlements in Australia result in one party receiving between 50-65% of the total asset pool." I've shown you guys three different sources that all claim that women are significantly more likely to live in poverty post …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:12 AM
2

incentivize - motivate or encourage (someone) to do something women are lied to and told that divorce benefits them financially Your OWN WORDS prove that women are being incentivized to divorce. Read a dictionary. Statistics, facts & reality are irrelevant here.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 03:36 AM
18

I'm sure we'll all be devastated that we disappoint you. Sooo, we "cherry pick" data like feminists do the Gender Pay Gap data? I bet you don't have any examples of that tho, if you do please make a post showing it, any number of us will be happy to assist in your education.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:28 AM
2

LMAO
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:10 PM
1

<shrug> he gave one example, that's a singular man. You quoted him saying men, you responded with men. I pointed out that none of the men have to be rich.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 06:25 AM
7

He said attractive, you said rich. There is some crossover but a chad doesn't have to be rich to have females lining up for him.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:29 PM
16

It's a killer move, there's no way that guy will survive a block like that AND an order to delete his account!!... I'm just glad wasn't me.. ;-)
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:09 AM
26

Hard to tell, could be for the current stupid comment, could be just on general principal based on his history of stupid comments, could be cause it's raining... <shrug> probably one of the first two tho.. ;-)
/r/MensRights21/01/24 06:40 AM
-1

And I'm about to prove it to you all! With in just one post. Mate, didn't you read his post, He proves it!!! ;-) oh, and I agree with you 100%, the guy's a dipshit.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:40 AM
10

You’re upset because they’re all women? You should be, hardly the equality feminists are always bangin on about now is it.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 11:29 AM
3

Oh well, I'm done with it. Thank You
/r/MensRights05/01/24 12:42 AM
1

One of the things that sexism is based on. Sexism is something that is done not something that is, ie: an action not a label, sexism, prejudice or discrimination based on sex or gender and your flag argument is idiotic.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 04:11 AM
11

None of that dribble is in any way connected to what I said.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:52 PM
17

Why not you just “you’re funny” “you’re strong” - why is the baseline a comparison to men? Why is that the default? For the same reason John McEnroe said Serena Williams was the best FEMALE tennis player ever. You just commented on a question for "People over 40" If you are over 40 then you should know why "for a woman" is used. If you aren't over 40 then you should seek professional help, your random attention seeking is not normal or healthy. Oh, and your "list" is of no interest to any sane m…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:25 PM
0

You say; Good work for checking their post history. As for OP, THEY HAVE NEVER EVEN POSTED IN OUR SUB BEFORE!! but just 10 Days ago the OP posted multiple times in this thread.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:29 AM
2

A 20yr old student bitchin at others for not "having facts" while also claiming he doesn't care about the education of the people he talks to.. Not sure "silly" is the right word mate... ;-)
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:02 AM
2

no self respecting man Probably the key part.. ;-)
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:03 PM
15

Yes, it ALWAYS matters to the physcology of the women with it. The more bodies the more damage to her physc in a number of ways. Absolutely not a good bet for a ltr.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:26 AM
7

But I still got downvoted for pointing that out, How do you know it was actually the guys here down voting you? I've watched a deleted post with only 1 comment get voted up and down. I should have been the only person that could see that post so I suspect bots are active. Do you think we don't get passing any passing feminist trolls voting on stuff?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:23 AM
14

> Say another joke please Women's systematical and social oppression for CENTURIES. oh, wait, that's not funny just uninformed.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:36 PM
3

Men be here, thick skin mandatory... lol
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter