TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OlearysCow Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by OlearysCow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

even better.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:41 PM
2

and 90% of the people that get caught doing it are women.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:13 AM
14

let me put it in context. "Just because you want attention doesn't mean you should smother your baby with a pillow. Infanticide is a crime. Don't be that mom."
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:41 PM
10

you people have no imagination http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchausen_syndrome_by_proxy#Prevalence_by_gender
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:33 PM
0

If you'd scrolled down just a little bit further
/r/TheRedPill29/12/12 03:26 AM
2

I'm trying to find it. damned reddit search is a piece of shit. the text in the original post is literally word for word, just with the genders transposed.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/12 07:45 PM
2

I was working on a little project just to show the gendered hypocrisy on reddit by digging up old RA and 2X threads and reposting them under throwaways with the genders transposed. I ran out of steam shortly after I started but here's one of them. The original is in 2X. gimmie a second to dig it up.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/12 07:18 PM
13

A lot of those guys there aren't there to get advice. They want women to tell them comforting lies. (no, we don't care about how much money you make. no, the size of your dick doesn't matter. no, we don't like to date jerks.) I got fed up posting there and pulled a kamakazi and got myself banned. But if you actually want people to listen to you, you'll have to be extremely diplomatic when explaining your point of view because the truth for a lot of the guys there is going to be more than a littl…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/12 06:29 PM
0

They believe their corporate success elevates their SMV some of them do. most don't do it for SMV. they do it for access to powerful men.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/12 02:53 AM
3

I'm 28, so no I don't know women in their 30s or 40s intimately, and I hope that if I do, it's not for a very, very long time.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 05:19 AM
2

the general consensus is that the reason successful women remain unmarried in their 30s and 40s (and die childless or get sperm donors and raise children alone) is because they refuse to marry down in social status. If successful women want brave men, there are plenty of divorced military men that could make use of a woman with a good job and a nice place to shack up.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 02:46 AM
1

It'll hit her when she's 35 but by then it'll be to late. Just work on yourself, (your career, social skills, fitness, emotional health) forge a warpath during your 30s and 40s, do some traveling, and retire to some tropical beach when your 50 or 60 with all the money you saved not having kids.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/12 01:16 AM
3

exactly. the game is competing for the attention of women, and you've 'won' once you've worked on yourself hard enough to make it to that top 20 percent that women notice.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 06:13 PM
1

Determing what rules you'd like to enforce on your own kids is not the same as determining what laws the US should enforce. link to the post I made where I said this. I think you've made it clear that you're arguing for the sake of argument. You likely didn't read the article and are just hoping for an "AHA!" moment were you can claim someone is supporting child-rape. I think you realized you fucked up about 8 posts ago and are desperately trying to cover. Feel free to link to all those posts wh…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:35 PM
7

Men want sexual access. Women hold the sex card. Women want commitment. Men hold the commitment card. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I think you're a little left of center. Women want men's resources. The reason women historically wanted commitment in the past was because it meant continued access to mens resources into the woman's old age. otherwise he could dump her when she got old and wrinkly and replace her with someone younger and prettier. the reason women don't want commitment now is t…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 04:32 PM
1

Reading, how does it work? link me to the post where I said it, then. You did. link that one while you're at it. Except I never disagreed with your strawman. I'll use this quote of yours as an example. I said, that I think that past the age of 16, parents should be the one's to decide what their kids are doing. and then you came along and said, No they shouldn't. teenagers are old enough to decide for themselves. Yes, parents can set rules for their kids. So now you're changing your story. That …
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:19 PM
2

mystery method 101. never ask for her name, and don't tell her yours unless she asks for it.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 04:02 PM
1

No, that's not what you're saying. Yes it is. you don't get to decide what I am and am not saying. You're imaging some huge difference in maturity between an 18 year old and a 16 year old. A difference that makes one a consenting adult and the other a rape victim in 100% of the cases. I never said or implied anything like this. I don't see such a gulf between the two. good for you. Because we aren't talking about parents having rules for their kids. that's about the stupidest reason to disagree …
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:53 PM
1

I'm actually a prototypical nice guy but I've got enough foresight to know that if I want a pretty girl to notice me, I've got to be a dick.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 03:49 PM
1

that's what I'm saying you fucking moron. If you're not going to read my post, don't respond to it. edit: but now that I'm here... That is a tangent. yes, it is. but since you don't agree with it I want to know why.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:26 PM
1

something the article never really nailed down was exactly how the dating dynamic changed. are these older women settling for NSA, are they still getting more traditional dates but from men they consider beta's, or are they getting passed up altogether? And the other, more important part, is what's considered a "win" in the dating game? for the first question, unless the women are getting passed up altogether, I don't see a clear win or loss. Even if the guys are getting NSA from desperate middl…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 03:18 PM
2

it's called the confirmation bias. and it isn't a gender specific. don't lose your shit. MRA's are acting in good faith, just call it out when you see it and people will correct for it.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:19 PM
2

I think 15/16 year olds are better at making choices than children, but they sure as fuck aren't going to be as good as 18/21/25/30 year olds. That's why they're not legally adults. seriously, when the fuck did it become not-o.k. for parents to have rules for their children?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:16 PM
6

Truly shows how indifferent the average human really is. ftfy
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:47 PM
2

If you go into a set acting like a typical alpha-male asshole, and a woman likes you for it, fuck her. she deserves to get pumped and dumped.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/12 03:36 AM
2

exactly
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:54 PM
0

wow. 4chan got played. wonder how they feel about that.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:12 AM
0

because you can still run into that situation with a legal age gap.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:16 PM
1

so if a girl lies about her age, you're cool with sending the guy she fucks to jail?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:27 PM
3

and I know parents that would go psycho if their 18/19/20 year old daughter was having sex. there are crazies out there and they're going to make their kids life hell. but it's better than the system we have now, which is one that takes 18 year old boys and sends them to prison for fucking their highschool girlfriend.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:19 PM
2

male sexuality has been demonized for longer than recorded history. creep shaming is just the latest incarnation.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/12 12:49 PM
2

and by the same token there are lots of parents that don't give a damned, or even encourage it.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:05 PM
-1

when you get to the age of 15/16 that's when it should be the parents, (not the state) that decide whether or not they're ok with what their daughter is doing.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:17 AM
5

should I feel sad for having stories that trump most of the top posts?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:47 AM
0

tl;dr get fixed and let her figure out on her own.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:49 PM
1

This just makes me want to see girlwriteswhat on the JRE podcast even more.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:20 AM
2

so when are they going to send the women to finishing school?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:31 AM
-1

You haven't posted a single link this entire discussion and in your article you post two links to blog posts about looks and three about health and looks. None of which are relevant to the comment I'm responding to; which is T's link to social status.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 07:42 AM
1

Body builders also have unnaturally high T levels, regular guys can't ever hope to getting their T levels that high, but you're right, too much of a good thing can be bad. I bet almost any steroid free method / drug free method of jacking up T levels won't get you close to what those guys are riding on. It has nothing to do with good or bad. it has to do with "they shouldn't do it because it doesn't change anything. because upping your T levels doesn't change your social status" Nobody said anyt…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 07:33 AM
0

Read it. Answered it. Done with your trolling. no you didn't. and you still haven't. cortisol isn't a factor in your social status. It's the measurement women use to tell what your social status is. comprendo? see? you skipped right over the first part. And as I've said before, T is a factor, and one of the bigger ones, but It's one of a million variables. And we haven't even gotten into a discussion of prenatal T exposure and postnatal T exposure. and that was the second part you skipped. Yes. …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 07:15 AM
-1

I wasn't responding to your article I was responding to your comment about social status and T. And do you really agree with me? lets do a little test. Basically, "pecking order" is determined by testosterone levels, which can be manipulated and maxed out with good health and nutrition. First comment I disagree with There are certaintly other things you can do to raise social proof, but research points towards testosterone levels determining what position you end up in. second comment I disagree…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 07:02 AM
0

Which one gets better results with the ladies? I'm guessing guy number 2, but if you want to bury your fucking head in the sand be my guest. projecting much? It's ironic you accuse me of burying my head in the sand when you deliberately dodge the premise/thesis of my argument. Or maybe you've read my last post and still don't understand it. I don't know what makes you think that I don't believe cortisol factors in there, just because I don't explicitly mention it in the article doesn't mean I do…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 06:53 AM
-2

Lol, maybe you should get some more cortisol research that isn't funded by the feminist movement as well. horseshit. if you think the study is wrong prove it. you're not going to fool anyone with your unsubstantiated association fallacy. not significantly linked, meaning they were linked but the cortisol link was stronger. which is what I've been trying to say. It's funny because I'm basically agreeing with you here but for some reason you want to start a big war about a non-issue. No, you said …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 06:12 AM
-1

And women will choose a high T low cortisol man over both ~ which is the end goal of good health. the study I just linked: "Men with low cortisol levels were often rated as more attractive than guys with high cortisol levels. Testosterone levels were not significantly linked with attractiveness, masculinity or health. " I'm certaintly not condoning increasing cortisol levels as a method of getting better results. first, I said: in primates the ones on the bottom of the pecking order have the hig…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 03:28 AM
-1

testosterone isn't the only variable in where you stand on the pecking order. your social status and social intelligence are the 800 pound gorilla. when given the choice between men with high T and and high cortisol and low T and low cortisol, women choose the latter. edit: to elaborate in primates the ones on the bottom of the pecking order have the highest cortisol levels, and the ones at the top have the lowest T is a variable in how much time a man is going to spend jockeying for position, b…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/12 02:57 AM
4

speaking as a good looking guy that isn't socially dominant; women will want/expect you to fight for the top of the pecking order. And when you don't, not only will you become completely neutral to them, some will even resent you for it. I can tell you that social proof has been the difference between sitting on the sidelines of a party and having groups of women cold approach me.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/12 06:05 PM
2

I never read it that much in the first place. They spend all day talking about self help platitudes and "inner game" instead of the actual mechanics of seduction.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/12 05:14 PM
1

we need to find out how to infiltrate this app.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 07:46 AM
11

allegedly it takes a woman 3 months to get over breakup, but it takes a man three years. My theory has always been that it takes three years because that's how long it takes for everyone to stop beating him over the head with how it was his fault they broke up and how if he was a better boyfriend they'd still be together.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:39 AM
0

that is not the situation. it's an idiotic platitude. you're wrong
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:29 PM
0

And I think MRA's are by and large ignorant. Because they're letting feminists play by a different set of rules. I think that MRA's should be able to put up posters and hand out flyers without being threatened with boxcutters. I think they should be able to attend public events without having the entrance blocked and being insulted/shamed. And I also think they should be able to mod this sub without the fear of getting doxxed and losing their job because of slanderous phone calls. It's basic gam…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:31 PM
2

actually the number one factor is whether or not the father is cut.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:03 PM
0

it isn't the only factor but it is a factor.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:02 PM
7

if circumcision causes sex to be less enjoyable, it stands to reason that would reduce anticipation toward sexual contact in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:49 AM
-1

srs
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:02 PM
-6

I don't recall haveing to explain to italians that our problem wasn't with them; it was mussolini. Why do MRA's have to take every feminist out for an icecream cone? They'll like is when we win. http://youtu.be/yXKd8Ps4nKs?t=4m31s
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:00 PM
2

I don't know what I like more, his accent or his t-shirt.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:08 PM
0

no. I'm saying your argument is stupid.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 04:35 AM
1

I'm not saying you shouldn't do it because something might go wrong.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 04:12 AM
1

No. I'm saying that the "if done correctly it's perfectly safe" is a retarded because every task has a margin of error and nobody does every task perfectly all the time.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:47 AM
1

I think you missed the point
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:05 AM
1

that probably has something to do with the fact that circumcision causes alexythemia.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:17 PM
6

the risk of riding a unicycle on a tightrope over a pit of alligators drops to zero when you do it right too. some things are easier to screw up than others.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:15 PM
7

my theory was always much simpler. Just use their statements about nice guys as one of these. The reason they think nice guys intentions are insincere and that they feel entitled is because that's what women think and feel when they're nice. but it never really explained the hate and vitriol nice guys got. Cognitive dissonance (I like nice guys, but I don't like this guy. therefor he must not be nice.) might explain the extreme reaction.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:05 PM
-13

text "How can a girl rape a boy" Nearly everyone I dsjf ha khds for the rfvt grby ujmhs after yhn ghdgfh. "Man Up" My fdsfjdsa in sdfsadfsadf to the afjkhadsf I was fdkghj, sdfkhasf by jdsafh my adhsfsa for the safhsa time since the dsfhasf a had ajklfhds eight years dsfkhsafjklsa.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:45 AM
2

bitchin
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:30 PM
8

wish there was actual video of the conference so everyone could see the "hate speech" they're talking about.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:20 PM
7

you educate people that are ignorant. they aren't ignorant. they're liars. you don't educate liars. You sue them for libel and slander.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:16 PM
38

simple test to tell whether someone's feelings should be taken seriously: Do they have any basis in reality?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:16 PM
0

Zuh?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:36 PM
82

actually he's a mexican immigrant that's half hispanic, half jewish.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter