TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Omega_Molecule Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by Omega_Molecule on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

You aren't physically threatened by them, people accepting them and some people finding them attractive means your view of attraction as static between all people is threatened because it just might not be true. I'm sorry if that context wasn't clearly, I thought it was. Also using the language 'you people' only serves to prove the view point that red pills are bigoted. I know you probably don't care if people think you are a bigot, because society is controlled by pc feminists, but just remembe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 02:59 PM
10

Because if it doesn't fit into his hegemonic view of masculinity then it threatens his idea of what is and isn't masculine, and red pills, like most dogmatic world views, strive, above all else, to avoid seeing issues with their own philosophy, I'm being generous of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 01:44 PM
1

You are right, you win, women will send us all to jail, use hypergamy and trapping us with pregnancies, they only care about our utility to them, they are the ones truly privileged in society despite millenia long persecution from men who have been the ones in power in nearly every instance from the dawn of recorded history, somehow women have, in a mere 30 years switched that dynamic and men live in what could be considered mental and social slavery to women. It's amazing how they undid milleni…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:59 PM
1

Just because those men were exonerated doesn't mean they were convicted on the word of a woman, their could have been evidence that made it look like they were guilty when they weren't. I'm too busy to respond to anything else.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:07 PM
1

53 exonerations? In a country of 300 million that is a statistical none entity. It's terrible that that happened to those men, but the number of rapes in this country is enormous on comparison to that number. Most rapes are real.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:05 PM
1

First off, my generalizations are not about you specifically, it is about Men's Rights promoters, specifically the red pill. Second, yes the Men's Health Network does not directly given medical services, I never said they did. But the members do valuable research and outreach, the network supports those goals. Your assumption, which I imagine are based on anecdotes, about how women can have men imprisoned with just a rape accusation are just unfounded, again, show me the evidence of this. Men be…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:30 AM
1

Again no proof. And those reductionist things I mentioned are stereotypes your community makes. How am I being close minded? I have been open minded to your community, but in doing so I found it to be filled with a lot of bad things. As to your claim men have no support, there is this thing I was a part of in college, called the Men's Health Network, and I was in a research group that was a sub part of it that promoted men's health issues and research into masculinity. I am pro man, but I am als…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:08 AM
1

Sadly you have no proof of anything in this rambling thing, you say things make guesses and connect them to others to fit your predetermined idea of what they mean. You don't know of that men die younger because they sacrifice themselves for women. Mortality rates, especially global ones, are immensely complex and to boil them down to one sentence is reductionist at best. But reductionism is a large part of the red pill philosophy. You reduce men to sexual animals who should manipulate women int…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:05 PM
1

I am referencing the findings of this report. report Edit: You will notice it mentions the divide between traditionally 'male' and 'female' jobs as contributing to the gap, but it is not the only impact, and women who move into those male jobs still face a pay gap, and men who move into female jobs tend to be paid more.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:44 AM
1

The data I have seen compares the same jobs, not overall. You are misinterpreting the statistic.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:01 AM
-2

Maybe they are just better than you and it has nothing to do with their sex? Maybe they were able to overcome the disadvantages of being a women just like it sounds like your sister was able to overcome being wheelchair bound? Maybe you didn't try as hard or weren't pushed as hard because of the privilege we receive as men? For every example of a strong well paid women you can give I can give ten times as many that aren't.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:09 PM
0

That number isn't about hours worked. It about hourly rates. Basically, all things being equal, women earn less for the same work. What do work related injuries have to do with pay?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:06 PM
2

Maybe you have to hide your opinion the same way people who believe aliens visit the earth hide theirs? Do you work at or attend that school?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:05 PM
1

You clearly don't know anything. No true scotsman is a logical fallacy, not something you call yourself or others.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:02 PM
-1

You can't point out every ill in society and say 'oh feminists aren't for equality for everyone because they don't fight for every issue affecting every group.' A lot of the issues you pointed out are not even social in origin. Men die younger for lots of reasons, most are not the result of social or financial inequality. Men die from work related injuries more because they work in more dangerous fields. These issues are issues, but they aren't due men being treated poorly or less than. They are…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:55 PM
1

As far as your belief that certain aspects of our society are sexist against men, who or what do you blame for that? Feminism? Do you think feminism, in its early days was not needed? Perhaps male apathy toward certain things, like health and reproduction, among others, lead to this disparity you see? I see nothing wrong with pursuing desires, but, if in that pursuit, you neglect other things, like being a good person, caring for everyone, these are just examples, maybe poor ones, is it not detr…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:56 PM
1

In regards to men wanting "beautiful women," but beauty is subjective, is it not? Wouldn't you agree beauty changes with the times? How is it a result of evolution? I have watched that documentary and I found it, from a researcher's standpoint, lacking. Much of it is extrapolation on shaky data. More questions, you can always ask me as well: Do you think women should be given equal rights to men? Why or why not. I didn't say they only care about sex, but seem preoccupied with it. Do you think th…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 07:54 AM
1

Well, I disagree with such an emphasis on sex, and, to me, what appears as an over sexualization of most things in life. Though I agree that sex is a large part of life, being the way life continues, I think we should strive to focus on bettering life, not just enjoying sex and making more of it. I do not agree with those, and they seem to be many, that say all feminists are fat, ugly, and, as one user said, "don't know how to be right." Stereotyping is rarely, if ever, a proper way of getting t…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 05:30 AM
2

Look at what an ideology is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology In that post sexual strategy is about your goals with the opposite sex. The definition continues, and says it is a "way of looking at things." That sounds exactly like a lot of what trp is based on what I have seen. Look, so far you have been a good sport, and commented respectfully, I have not gotten that treatment here much. I just want to say, while I disagree with everything trp is about, and many of the people on here seem l…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 05:09 AM
1

Deceitful? Ill agenda? What? Because I don't believe in trp I can't take part in discussions with people here? This sub proves very isolationist when someone attempts to debate its merits, that doesn't make me have much faith in it, if you can't take debate then maybe something is wrong with your beliefs. I'm not being deceitful, I was asking a question, one I genuinely wanted to know what you thought. I then took what you said, and looked at it logically. I dont see deceit or conniving intent.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:54 AM
1

I didn't say that. But you said subjectivity leads to extremism, and then said that trp is different and say how people apply it differently. Meaning there is room for extremism.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:52 AM
1

You aren't even engaging in a proper discussion.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:51 AM
2

Not strictly defined, but going over the posts there is certainly a set of beliefs and, certain guidelines, like for game.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:51 AM
1

It being a forum has nothing to do with this, it is a belief set, and all belief sets are applied differently by all people, trp isn't unique in that respect. You say extremism comes from 'subjective interpretation' and then say that trp is applied differently, which is the same as saying subjectively. You prove my point for me.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:14 AM
1

Good ignore my points and continue to believe your ideas based on personal experience and prejudice. I do know a hot feminist, she is strong, sexy, and independent. But she also dates, and the guys she dates are kind, smart, and strong. Do my anecdotes have the same weight as yours?
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 03:39 AM
5

I was being facetious, and did not mean that, I was using the same style this sub uses to be rude to those they dislike. I didn't continue because I thought you were done. You didn't really make points, just stated opinions. I am challenging the claim of this sub, this sub must prove the claim, it is not my job to put evidence to the contrary, you must present evidence for your claim. I am busy right now and can do research later to further this.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 09:37 PM
1

But those observations of society are not objective. And beauty does change with time, that is undeniable.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 09:09 PM
3

Your anger and out rage only prove the weakness of your arguments. If you read what I said I dot think a pretty girls are dumb. I don't stereotype. It is this kind of isolationism and orthodoxy that makes this sub so stagnant and merely a circle jerk for men who resent women, and feel bad for men.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 09:04 PM
1

I didn't say it is unfair, I said the reasons people think it is unattractive are purely social constructs that aren't based on fact. I didn't talk about fairness, I don't think people should be attracted to anything over anything else. But, treating those who are unattractive poorly is never right, and many people on hear are rude and hateful about woman. I do not want to debate for debates sake. I want to discuss. I want this because this ideology makes no sense to me and I want to see what it…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:59 PM
0

We are animals, but to give in and just accept our more primal reactions is setting a low bar. Society is about overcoming these selfish desires to work together and create something greater. If we all just did what we wanted to, only worried about our primal needs we would still be living in caves using sticks. We have our logic to thank for this discussion, for the ability to come up with philosophies, even ones as shaky as the red pill. To just say we are animals is lazy philosophy. That is m…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:48 PM
-2

I am sorry for your struggles, abuse is a terrible issue, if everyone was more concerned about their fellow man I think it would not happen as much. As far as fairness is concerned, I don't think life, or reality, inherently are fair or unfair. It is folly to assign either term to life. Sometimes life seems fair, sometimes it does not. As this is concerned you have to ask who, or what, is the universe fair or unfair to? To assume it is unfair, against groups you are in, to me, seems like self pi…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:28 PM
-2

I do have issues with this ideology. It is not based on fact, it is based on personal experiences which are not reliable measures for truth. Few people on here actually have proof of their claims, and just say things. Perhaps you got treated poorly, perhaps you thought you were but weren't, and now think you are treated better and maybe you are or aren't. We cannot experience reality because we are separated from it by our senses, the phaneron is what we experience. To claim truth about memories…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:19 PM
5

The burden of proof lies with the person who makes the claim. It isn't my job to give evidence against your claim, I didn't make a counter claim. I merely said you have no proof of your claim. Most people I meet are nice, kind, hard-working individuals, regardless of what they label themselves. Generalizing based on these labels is illogical and prejudicial.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 07:53 PM
0

Who gets to decide what is fair and unfair judgement? Accepting the 'facts of life' is just a scapegoat use to justify behaviors and ideals which have no other support. We should challenge facts, not merely accept them. If we don't challenge data and proof and just accept facts and what people say we fall into belief sets which lead no where and prevent progression. Which is what a lot of the so called red pill does, when, at the same time, tries to make people think it is the way of doubt and t…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 07:49 PM
5

You have no evidence to support that. My implying beautiful people are all stupid was just using your same stereotyping based on anecdote as you employed, to prove how illogical it is to assume so much about large groups. Our personal experiences with members of groups should not be use to judge the entire group.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 07:38 PM
-1

Well, in our society women are subjected to more pressure as far as their appearance is concerned. Though both sexes are subjected to it. It is sexist to imply that hair is inherently manly, we assigned ideas regarding traits to sexes.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 07:35 PM
7

You say this from what anecdote? Because that is a realizable source of being right and gaining truth.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:54 PM
4

I never said that, and your attitude is not respectful or conducive to an actual discussion.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:53 PM
-5

Men, as a group, don't have a consensus on what is and is not attractive. What we find attractive is a combination of biology and social conditioning. This article makes a good point that what is and is not socially acceptable changes throughout time, and that what we like today may be considered hideous in years to come.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:28 PM
12

There is no proof that those who call themselves feminists are considered uglier than those who do not. This is just anecdote perpetuated because it supports the views of people on this sub. Besides, beauty is not an objective fact, it varies from person to person and throughout the ages. Remember heavyset women were the epitome of attractive in the renaissance. What we think is beauty is as much social conditioning as the so called 'resentment' you all say women feel. Perhaps these 'prettier' g…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:21 PM
1

The issue with this theory is that it is based upon the assumption that all attraction is based on those three things and those things alone. People choose partners for many reasons, other than those traits.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 06:11 PM
0

You speak as though what is natural is always preferable, as if all cultural conditioning is bad, and negatively impacts us. This is not the case. It is natural for us to not wear clothes and to live naked, society has conditioned use to want to wear clothes, through shame and habit. Clothing, mostly, benefits us. Social conditioning does as well, sometimes. We are in fact not apes, we share a common ancestor with apes, you don't seem to understand evolution. Evolution has no concept of advanced…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 05:36 PM
1

You speak as though what is natural is always preferable, as if all cultural conditioning is bad, and negatively impacts us. This is not the case. It is natural for us to not wear clothes and to live naked, society has conditioned use to want to wear clothes, through shame and habit. Clothing, mostly, benefits us. Social conditioning does as well, sometimes. We are in fact not apes, we share a common ancestor with apes, you don't seem to understand evolution. Evolution has no concept of advanced…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 05:32 PM
0

Being attracted to a woman for her physicality isn't rewarding her. That implies that all woman want is a man, that everything they do is to get a man's attention. That idea is idiotic. People have many differing motivations, and to reduce everyone to simple, mostly sexual, drives is primitive. And those who think everything everyone does is related to sex believe that because it validates their own, unhealthy, obsession with sex. Feminism does not approve of the objectification, attraction and …
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:41 AM
1

Please link these studies, and I question the reductionist viewpoint that success is measured by a single variable of any kind. The same could be said for men, men gauge their success and dominance over other men by the amount of women they attract. That isn't a sex trait, it is a human one.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 07:17 AM
1

Our society is fraught with women dieting, trying to get "sexy" and make themselves better. Our society is obsessed with these things, to say women don't focus on these things and to live in today's world requires seem serious cognitive dissonance.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 01:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter