TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Omz-bomz Archive

View 0 posts and 265 comments by Omz-bomz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But it is breaking consent. The consent was with the condition that contraception, condom, was used. Removing it without the other party knowing automatically breaks the consent given, as the conditions it was given on is no longer valid. I don't like widening the rape umbrella, but consent is something that has been embedded in rape laws throughout the western world now, and as such we need to define it to be gender neutral under the same premises they have already set it by.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 11:14 AM
1

Rape by deception is a thing in many places, including where lying about that you are rich makes you a rapist according to feminists. So rape by deception where someone is trans is way more severe than any of the other reasons.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 10:33 AM
3

I don't agree that 16 with 26 is rape, though I agree that it has a high potential of being a chance of grooming, and is not desired as there is a significant mental gap that could include venues of coercion. But it isn't rape just because of the age, 16 years old are capable of taking choices themselves (even though poor ones)
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:01 PM
24

Very feminist coded this. "using serious emotional pressure and guilt to get sex in a relationship", something primarily done by women, should be on the same level as "A husband forcing sex upon a wife ..." But a woman forcing sex is never seen as bad. "A 16 year old eagerly has sex with a 26 year old"... Yeah, they missed out on having the genders in this one, because if it is 16 old boy, they see it as no problem at all. But if it is a 16 year old girl it is. Also, "Not revealing being transge…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:09 AM
19

removing condom is actually more rape than most other things on it's list. It's removing what might, or probably is one of the conditions a person agreed to have sex, and without it wouldn't agree to begin with. And it might be both genders, I have had a girl removing the condom from me sneakily, and if she was intent on getting pregnant without my consent, it is rape (she wasn't)
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:03 AM
31

Huh, guess that's an oversight by the Australian government. They probably will get around to it sooner or later... Only half joking sadly, It's good that the training is nuanced and actually contains that information, for now. But misandry is rampant in the Australian government, just look at the rhetoric and plans surrounding the "national plan to end violence against women and children", that most definitely sets men as main, often single possible perpetrator. Same with perpetrator interventi…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:57 PM
2

Where they are located isn't the biggest issue, the feminist takeover that happened in the 2010's are, funded by among others Amnesty International and other feminist organisations. They attacked the most prolific article writers and admins just because they were male, requiring that information became "more gender balanced" ie, written by women. And through this fight actively added feminist ideologues to the admin group, forcing out long time active participants that became fed up with the pol…
/r/MensRights16/05/26 09:38 AM
47

and opposition to feminism—behavior generally considered toxic Ahh, far left nutjobs. Being in opposition to feminism is the more rational stance to be in. Over a third of men (35.4%) fell into an atoxic group, showing low levels across all harmful indicators. 53.8% of men could be clustered into two moderate profiles, exhibiting low-to-moderate scores on most traits and differing mainly in levels of sexual prejudice. A smaller group of 7.6% fit a benevolent toxic profile, due to high scores in …
/r/MensRights04/04/26 04:43 PM
37

There is no evidence, rather evidence to the contrary, that GenderCritical was taken down by posting anti male hatred. Reddit has never acknowledged or acted on widespread misandry. They should have used more subreddits to widen their reach, though with the methodology being as flawed as it is, they probably wouldn't have gotten anything better out of it anyway.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 10:35 AM
68

While they explored the topic, the writers have a heavy bias, this is perticularly obvious in how they write related works. This body of research highlights the varied and insidious ways in which the Manosphere perpetuates gender-based hatred and violence, using both extremist and moderate rhetoric to normalize misogyny across different online platforms. Ok, so already taking as truth other heavily biased "research". Now to the research itself. First, they only check 4 subreddits, Feminism, Gend…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 09:49 AM
1

If you said to the U.N. groups that come up with these "International Women's [X] Day" things that they had to have a corresponding Men's day for each one they would just stop doing the Women's days immediately. It's the U.N as a whole, it's a feminist misandrist organisation at it's core. Even "international day of x" that isn't specifically for a female only issue is more often than not straight out saying men and boys are the issue and women are the victims.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 11:10 AM
1

Petitions work, also writing to all government officials work, just very slowly. For example, mens rights movement in Denmark had a yearly mailing list they sent out every year to all government positions related to gender issues (and some beside that). Filled with statistics related to mens issues, from suicide to child abduction cases (mother taking the child),etc, and how it changed year after year. It took over 15 years before they got any response. In the beginning recipients didn't even bo…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:22 PM
0

Are you sure you are framing that question correctly? Why not, is communism a feminist construct? Marx was definetively influenced by women that participated in different events through early 1830 and 1840s. Though I think it was Friedrich Engels that was the more "feminist" of them. For example, in the book "the German Ideology" that came out before the communist manifesto Marx and Engels write "The origin of private property lies in the family, where wife and children are the slaves of the hus…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 12:38 PM
6

Many of those statistics just can't be true. 91% of new homes? Really? Sure they have an input on home purchase done jointly, but so do men. Many of these they must have a very spesific and generous interpretation of the statistics to get to that conclusion. Take it for what it is.. Girlpowermarketing, ie girl math.... Or more seriously, an organisation that wants to inflate it's self worth and influence by making outlandish claims.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 11:09 AM
2

Well, I'll be... f) (Amended: 12/5/2022-7406/2 art.) Against women, As I stated in my edit, I wouldn't be surprised. Hard to find any turkish legal reasoning around the change. The original sentence was argued that because it was 2 lives affected, the woman and the child, it should be more serious. Now it is just any woman...
/r/MensRights22/10/25 02:32 PM
-2

When was this changed? I can only find the penal code from 2016 online, and the only thing that was in that law was about pregnant woman, not any women. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2016)011-e011-e) Article 82 (1) If the act of intentional killing is committed: a) With premeditation, b) Brutally or through torment; c) By causing fire, flood, destruction, sinking, bombing or by using nuclear, biological or chemical weapons; d) Against a direct ascenda…
/r/MensRights22/10/25 01:54 PM
4

don't drink ever, or don't drink to the point you can't remember what you did the day afterwards, like ignoring sex that sounds like a bad idea, what if someone tricked you to give them your cerdit card number or something? Many many people drink to the point where you can't remember what you did the day afterwards, and yes they should control their alcohol intake more. But it is a bit different remembering if your own actions was enthusiasticaly willing or not, or doing something obviously stup…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 01:32 PM
7

Mistakes can happen, often related to alcohol. Not remembering that you were a willing participant the night before (weird that it is only women that can claim rape even if both parties are equally drunk and willing) Or being told from girlfriends/friends that X person tried something last night, and then claiming he raped you (even though maybe nothing happened, or it was some other person) That is actually the number one cause of cases being dismissed as wrongful accused of rape, they couldn't…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 12:55 PM
11

There can be lots of reasons, Excuse, Revenge, narcisism, exploitation of power, misunderstanding, etc The reason are as varied as the cases it is related to. How you would find out if someone lied... That can be hard, and in some cases impossible. And you just have to make up your mind if you trust what you have been told from either of the parties, and who you belive. Other than that, trying to catch out inconsistencies in their retelling of the events that can show that they are not truthful.…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 12:36 PM
30

The commenter is literally projecting female behaviour on male victims. Replace "men" with "women" and you would have thousands calling it out for being hateful. But when it is men its just "a recorded phenomenon" But lets actually go through some of the arguments gender swapped. A lot of abusive women lie and reverse victim and offender, claiming they were abused when actually they were perpetrators WOW effect making this almost a standard feature in the west. "This is much more common than wom…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 04:24 PM
6

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/legal-matters/child-support.html Pay Child Support Before Applying for a Passport If you owe $2,500 or more in child support, you are not eligible to receive a U.S. passport. Took me 10 seconds of googling... I think I understand the reasoning behind it, not allowing people flee their responsibility by traveling abroad. Also it doesn't specify men, as the text is actually gender nautral, but the vast majority of child support cases it's men th…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 09:34 PM
12

I don't think I agree with all the "facts" in this study, some are a little bit of a grasp, and some I really don't see how his argument is a benefit towards men. A lot of the claims he debunks do have merit and are true, at least in part, but he chooses to debunk one facet of the claim, often not directly adressing the claim itself. While I understand this is because he tries to adress the feminists view that this gynocentrism is a force of nature, and thus a good thing, it doesn't always come …
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:14 AM
3

There is no discussion to be had with an soon 10 year old article.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 05:15 PM
16

She said she had heard a council member say: “Women should know their place in the kitchen and stick to ironing; men are the master race.” As if... that is like the dream sentence for a feminist to hear, I HIGHLY doubt that someone actually said that.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:21 AM
3

Patriarchy, as defined by feminism is not real.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 06:35 AM
7

Ehh.. While misandry is real, having a word for something isn't what makes it real. By that logic, patriarchy is real, or any other word feminists conjure up.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:47 AM
1

I don't want to come in defence of this lady, but there are cases where the partner of an terminally ill person have to be mindful of their own mental state. ​ “We saw different kinds of doctors. Not a single person ever offered me help,” she bemoaned. “They never asked, ‘Do you need a support system? Are you part of a counseling group?'” This is a huge omission from the medical field, and should be standard (it kinda is here, but many people still fall through the system) Not saying that she is…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:37 AM
26

Though I don't know Malta law history spesifically, this is almost certainly just the implementation of the EU directive for violence against women act, that has been ratified in more or less all EU countries (istanbul convention from... 2014? i think) This states that violence and murder of women is a gendered crime and should be sentenced stronger than any other similar crime. So, again. Blame the sexist EU, not the individual country (though they need to be shamed also)
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:28 PM
4

“an academic institution should have better standards than to promote events about ‘the pitfalls of Feminism’”. Says it all doesn't it. The rest of their argument (valid or not) is secondary to this, don't you EVER dare to argue against Feminism. Doesn't matter if the arguments against feminists is valid or not, you just aren't allowed to speak about it. This is cult speak, or religion if you will.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:16 PM
13

I really struggle to understand their underlying hypothesis / reasoning. Women is a lot more risk averse, something that answers the whole difference between men and women when it comes to competitive tactics. ​ When playing with a lower-performing partner, women more often chose to play alone, compared to men. Finally, when playing with an equally performing partner, men more often chose the winner-takes-all scheme compared to women. When asked to explain their choices, participants most often …
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:52 AM
191

Why do teachers give girls higher marks than boys?Italian researchers have the answer I know it's the headline of the article, not OP's comment, but it is just wrong. In the article itself: The study's authors say it's possible that, in reading, teachers unconsciously reward students exhibiting traditionally female behaviour, such as quietness and neatness, which make teaching easier for the teachers. Another theory is that inflated grades in mathematics are a way of trying to encourage girls, w…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:31 PM
1

Hmm, I remembered some guys in Atomic Blonde being good too. Not all guys were bad, there were some that were helping her along if I remember, even seeming willing to sacrifice themselves for her goals (in a good way) But the trend that women is good, all men are bad is definitely a woke trend.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:41 AM
10

I don't agree that strong female protaginist itself is woke. Then you must include Aliens too for example. It is that the character is strong just because she is a woman, or comments or actions towards "all men are bastards" in the plot that makes it woke. From your list, though I haven't watched all of them, I don't agree Atomic Blonde fit. Though it has been a while since I saw it last, it doesn't fit well with the rest. Yes it is a strong female character, but she is portrayed realistically (…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 07:31 AM
2

I was going to say, just celebrate it in November as the rest of the world, then I realised Scandinavia is the odd one out with having it in November, most of the world has it in June. Though there is some variability on which exact date in some countries, but majority has it on the same day as the US. https://www.finder.com/uk/fathers-day-dates Though it is more or less the same with mothers day, varies around the world.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 09:33 AM
-37

What source do you have on that number? I have heard large numbers before and sadly the data they are refering to are not supporting it. It happens, one is too many, but I just wouldn't claim such a high number unless we have new verifiable data to show. Edit: All below sources ties back to the same estimate made by Dan Bollinger, numbers which are taken out of thin air. I'm not saying it isn't happening, I'm not arguing against Bollingers claim that a lot get underrepported, his souce is flawed…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:04 AM
27

I'd like it better if your source was from someone who studies feminism Ahh, nice gatekeeping. Thats like only accepting catholic oppinions on theological questions (or morality in general). If you don't see that bias as an issue, that is on you. And good for you that you have friends that see not all men are rapists... How many of them have organisational or societal power to change the view of feminist that actually have an impact in society and law?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:40 PM
72

Don't victim blame. There can be lots of reasons why. Being in an abuse relationship doesn't always allow you to take rational decitions, or to see how bad the situation really is. From what we know she is manipulative and abusive and gaslights him into thinking it's his fault.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:15 PM
1

That's a bold strawman argument. Feminism doesn't own being for womens rights. Feminism is fighting for some women rights and priveleges, view through the lense of feminism ideology. You can be for women rights without being a feminist, and you can, in part, be a feminist and for women rights. But you can not be a feminist and be for mens rights.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:38 AM
3

Amazon prime had it, though I think it is rent only now depending on country. Roku should also have it from what I can see, if not you have google / youtube you can rent it on.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 12:39 PM
4

Haven't watched the movie but just reading about it and the comments on social platforms it's never going to happen. For example I saw the other day a critic sayint the movie wasn't that good because it was aimed at a limited focus group (young teen girls), and ofcourse he was attacked with the standard "This wasn't for you, you have no right to critique it, you are just an angry white male". This just screams preemptive attack on any critizism by attacking the messenger, instead of the message,…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:27 AM
7

You are thinking about equality of outcome, not equality of oppertunity. Yes, only pushing for equality of outcome will most likely negatively affect men. For example demanding that 50% of politicians must be women would in most places negatively affect men, not only because there are more active male politicians on a local level, thus making it easier for a female politician to get a higher position than it would be for an equally qualified male. But also can quickly lead to female politicians …
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:04 PM
5

https://www.mic.com/articles/88277/23-ways-feminism-has-made-the-world-a-better-place-for-men What is this.... It gave our economy a huge, long-lasting boost. Are feminists capitalists now? Only caring about GDP? sure it increased GDP and the economy, but there was drawbacks too, such as wage stagnation. Seems like they only care about GDP, not women's choice to choose to stay home or work less ​ It helped men achieve better relationships and more satisfying sex. Ehh, questionable at best. Many …
/r/MensRights10/02/22 11:50 AM
13

Advocating for women's rights on the grounds for "equality" isn't neccessarily going against equality, or moving towards superiority. It wholy depends on the definition of "equality". There are issues facing women, especially on an international stage (not western countries), and as long as "equality" in this case is only focusing on those true issues, with a solution that does not negatively affect men, then it is a step towards true equality. The way towards superiority is when you see all fac…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 10:55 AM
4

Men do have better spacial perception, I don't think that has been questioned (yet?) Men also have quicker response time, thats one reason why men generally is better at for example baseball or other fast moving games, also including pc games. From a biology standpoint it also makes sense, since men usually was the one out hunting or protecting the tribe, while women had other responsibilities such as gathering closer to the home and child rearing.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:15 PM
10

Get the HPV and HB vaccine if your sexually active. Go for prostate and colon cancer screenings. Go for a yearly physical. In most countries HPV is only given free to women, men having to go to private clinics to get it. Some countries has finaly gotten around to give boys it too after years of lobbying, after it is shown that men get lots of cancer from also, though usually labeled as an additional prevention for women not getting transmission. All the while there is routinely HPV screenings fo…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:41 PM
9

No. Most are, but wikipedia has had a pro feminism agenda for some years now. For example arranging meetings and workshops such as Feminist Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, sponsored amoung others by Amnesty International, to basically rewrite history. And most feminist related topics (and topics of interest to them) has watchgroups, where if you edit anything it will be reverted as the administrators curating those topics are heavily feminists. Doesn't matter if it is factual or not, or according to all …
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:44 PM
1

Even if it was meant to be a Ford Cougar, the only thing that has in common with a sports car is having two doors. Its a "sports" coupe, with poor handling and relative small engine. Only thing that is somewhat good with it, is it's aerodynamics.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:16 AM
1

yees? I have driven on a LOT of them. Still doesnt't make a Kuga a sports car.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:26 AM
186

That psyco and the story aside, I saw this: smashed up his sports car She vandalised his Ford Kuga I don't think they know what a sports car is...
/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:12 AM
31

This has already been implemented in several nordic countries, among them Norway. The result is marginally higher female representation in boards (total number only went up a few % as there are ways around it, at least the Norwegian laws), but a reduction in board knowledge and talent.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:53 PM
3

There are bound to be male rights groups in your area too Granted they are usually fairly small, but they are there. Just be cautious that it isn't an organisation rooted in feminist views. After that, one of the best thing I can recommend you, and your new group to do is gather national statistics on issues and laws affecting men and send it by letter to both sitting politicians in the senate and house of representatives, but also to government minister positions related to the causes. Do this …
/r/MensRights23/11/21 08:40 AM
10

Lol, are you high? This sub is far from a feminist movement, it's more anti-feminist than anything.You apparantly live under the dilusion that feminism is an equality movement, something that couldn't be further from the truth. In the most benign and positive way to look at the feminism movement is that of a female rights / female supremacy movement. In my view, the latter is more true, combined with an hate movement againt males. Edit: just for clarification, feminism being a female rights move…
/r/MensRights03/10/21 12:10 PM
10

If you never heard about duluth model you are willfully ignorant for being a feminist. It's one of the core tenet of the feminist ideology writen in law, ie men are bad always and should be the one punished and women are allways innocent.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 10:35 AM
6

That was a new angle, especially since women is more often the ones pushing it on children, not the father. This is true both in a religious setting, and in an traditional setting. Wish I had the sources at hand, but was a larger study by the UN in sub-saharan africa, and one other study I don't remember from whom that showed a larger religious percent in women, including following strict religious rules.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:24 AM
8

Recently Spain approved a change in these laws so that any violence towards a woman done by a man would be considered "gender violence This is the same under the whole EU, their violence against woman act from.. 2014 I think it was, pretty much demands this, that violence against women should be regarded as gendered violence and punished more harshly than "non gendered" violence, ie women against men.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 07:57 PM
20

Are you refering to the global gender gap report from the world economic forum, or the gender inequality index pushed by the UN? Both, and most other similar indexes, do not actually indicate gender equality, but female supremacy. ​ The GII is an inequality index. It shows the loss in potential human development due to disparity between female and male achievements in three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. Overall, the GII reflects how women are disadvantaged i…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:15 PM
47

Spain has it's feminist issues from what I have read, from giving "victims" money just for an alligation, not conviction, to laws being heavily gendered against men. Italy second best, would guess Croatia has the least gynocentrism from what info I come across
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:47 PM
10

The Duluth Model, a coordinated community response, received the GoldAward from the Untied Nations as the best policy model in the world to attendto domestic violence. He's actually praising the Duluth model, he really should remove the "h" in his first name. What an complete tool that has drank waaay too much of the feminist cool aid, his responses are just utterly insane.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:06 PM
6

6 years. Had to check myself as I had the same question
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:05 PM
1

There are a lot of statistics in the sidebar, and searchable in many other posts / comments here. But even with statistics in hand, that alone probably wont sway her in any way, she will most likely disregard it on a countless number of excuses. You need to get her interested in changing her mind first, then follow up with hard facts. Personally, the one thing that has gotten the most traction in a feminist brain is asking them what gender the person they listen to are. Ie, "According to what yo…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:31 PM
177

She hires them, without a second thought. Ideologues like that boss don't care, any criticism on the skills of the under-qualified female is just chalked up to as hate against women ("they just don't want women around"). And any underperformance after hiring is blamed on the men not wanting to work with her, hindering her from doing her job, as the boss as a woman knows that ofcourse every woman is just perfect in their job and any proof to the contrary is just mens fault. Then after a short whi…
/r/MensRights16/03/21 06:26 PM
1

Sure it would help to list what has been accomplished, as an inspiration. Though MRA isn't an US thing only (though that is what is mostly associated with online), so the goals and achievements is different depending on where you are in the world, and how the laws and issues are there. There is much overlap internationally, most prominently for example circumcision, that is something that has close to one solution worldwide, making it illegal to perform / do. But other issues can look similar, b…
/r/MensRights18/02/21 12:21 PM
2

Not having a movement leader has it's drawbacks, in that there is no lead or popular figure to draw in the masses to the cause or joining all the smaller MRA organisations together. But for the cause itself, that isn't necessary, and can be a weakpoint to take down all the issues that person are involved in. Do whatever you can locally and within your group. Petition the government, do street stands informing people etc, that will have much more effect in the long run. In Denmark for example, th…
/r/MensRights18/02/21 11:24 AM
10

yes
/r/MensRights19/09/20 07:06 PM
44

Their whole second paragraph is also total bullshit. FGM and MGM is both primarily upheld by women (though with MGM performed more often by males at least in western countries), an it has nothing to do with discriminatory ideology, you muppets.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 08:15 PM
2

Sure it is, any history or interpretation that isn't according to feminist dogma is disingenuous... Also, didn't say men and women are equals in everything in the bible, but that both men and women have their responsibilities and obligations to the other gender. Not just one sided.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:28 PM
2

And the Bible, and probably most other religious text state that men are to give themselves up for women, and serve them in their own way. Trying to paint the bible to say that women are supposed to be the man's slave is disingenuous at best, but that's feminism for you.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:48 PM
29

Spain is the only country in the European Union and developed countries, where the law differentiates between men and women in the same crime or misdemeanour I'm fairly certain the UK also have differenciation in the law in several aspects. Not to mention the EU violence against women act (I don't remember the exact name of it), that most, if not all EU countries ratified a few years ago, which defined voilence against women as "gendered voilence" and that countries should take steps to punish g…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 03:09 PM
2

Don't think I have seen statistics in any western country where total women in politics are nearing men numbers in anything but the top jobs. Minister posts, prime ministers, Mayors and the like is forced "diversity" to hire women, either by directly requiring it in the hiring process, or in the case of elected positions, parties pushing the few women they have to the top of lists due to ideology. Like in Finland where 60% of government positions are now women, and leaders of all 5 major parties…
/r/MensRights26/05/20 12:42 PM
1

Women also control majority voting stakes in most publicly traded companies. I'm interested in looking further into this one. You got any sources to link to? I was under the impression that men were more interested, and invested more into stocks (and started majority of companies, that eventually get traded publicly, usually giving them a large stock stake in the company)
/r/MensRights26/05/20 12:13 PM
24

That is an increadibly low resolution picture. Impossible to read anything on it.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 08:03 PM
11

Read the article... The whole thing. Repeatedly in the article she is understanding and sad for how the dad can't be with his son, and how he is home alone. Yes she is pleading her own plight, but I can't see that this is any negative portrayal of the father or that it is only about her. She seems to be apreciative of what he is sacrificing for her, and to get income for the family. The only thing I would poke fun of: ​ “We left on the day. I didn’t know what to pack and it was essential items o…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:12 PM
2

I'm not certain how the finish political system is, but if it is like other Scandinavian countries where parties choose who to front in the election (including internal party elections), or heavily influences it, there is almost guaranteed artificial inequality. While those leaders were voted into government based on them being the first choice from their party, if 800 out of 1000 active politicians are men, it's not equality to have over half of political positions be female. If I remember the …
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:46 PM
9

I'd rather have people elected to meet the faux inequality quotas rather than using their connections to get in the government and steal from the taxpayer. But that's the problem, with quotas artificially inflating participation from a gender or race, it is more vulnerable to abuse than if it had not been there. There is a reason why places that pushed gender quotas hard is infested with feminists, because they actively abused the quotas to get into positions they would not get to by merit. And …
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:30 PM
1

I don't very often insult people, but you - and some more people here - are a Moron. Oh wow, an insult over the internet, how will I cope. ​ It is always done like this: "We talked about this, but didn't decide on it". The point is they actually talked about this and put it into the mind of those who are deciding. Let that slip in and for a moment think like you are the decider. I don't disagree with this notion, but the title of this thread is "Female patients are given preference for Intensive…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 07:13 AM
16

The title makes it sound like this has been implemented. In the article itself: The scoring system was considered in a piece of draft guidance which has now been scrapped, NHS sources say. So its fine to be upset with it, as it is blatanly sexist ("-1 for female sex"), but as of right now we have no indication that it is actually in use.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:08 PM
3

Ahh, but then it's not her fault you see. It's just poor management from before she became CEO, if only everyone had made all CEO's female earlier, everything would be fine... /s
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:52 AM
14

Jupp, breast cancer is the obvious one. There is 5-15x as much funding for breast cancer as it is for prostate cancer, depending on what western nation you look at. And that is public managed money, if you look at total money invested from private companies and people the difference is even bigger.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:46 PM
29

There is scientific basis to say men are the "weaker" sex when it comes to immune system, that is a fact though the author is obviously misandrist. Women on the other hand have a much higher chance of autoimmune diseases. Dispite men having the weaker immune system, we still spend countless times the money on female affecting diseases than male affecting one.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 01:56 PM
6

What a shit show of a law... I actually hadn't read that one before, and while I shouldn't be, I'm kinda shocked it went through. More blatant misandry would be hard to find. First they define women as the victims, either explicitly, or in the case of DV indirectly in later portions of the law. Then they define all actions taken against women to be hatefull, and forces measures to safegard and protect women alone. If there had been a similar law for men, I kinda would have accepted it, but ofcou…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 11:11 AM
11

Han sier at hverken rapporten fra PWC eller ikke andre tilgjengelige rapporter, kan bevise at det er likestillingen som direkte påvirker de økonomiske resultatene. He's saying that neither the report from PWC, or other available reports, can prove that it is equality that directly inpacts the economic results. This quote in the article from Matthew Smith, an investor in Storebrand pretty much sums it up. There is no factual basis to claim that "equality" through forcing female leaders, benefits …
/r/MensRights30/03/20 07:40 PM
14

It's Greenwich, a borough in south east London. You even have the icon from the Metropolitan police on the poster, a police organisation so woke they make ingsoc look like childsplay.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:02 AM
10

She starts right away poisoning the well: according to the online male supremacist community Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW). So they are male supremacists now are they, guess she has listened a bit too much to SPLC, a hate organisation in its own right, the one I can find that has called MGTOW a male supremacists movement. And I still can't see how a group that stands for not trying to play the "game" of women attraction because they see it as not worth it, and instead focus on themselves is ma…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 03:21 PM
1

Hah.. next time someone says that men runs the world, just say "hang on a second" and ask google on loudspeaker. If google say it, it can't be false can it?
/r/MensRights20/03/20 10:31 AM
8

(2) Where it is accomplished against a person's will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another. I'm uncertain about california laws, but this is the kind of wording they often use to make rape perpetrated by males more egregious and face harsher penalties. This is twofold, one defence will use that a woman is weaker than a male so he should just have stopped her, or that he wasn't _really_ in any danger, so she should ge…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:15 AM
1

% has no idea what it's like to be a man, no idea what it's like to be a father, and no idea what it's like to not have privilege. She's been privileged her whole life and she's the last person who should be the face of wokeness. Replace Taylor with just about any feminist and the sentence still rings true.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:27 PM
37

‘You’re not a trans person and you’re not a woman, so why have you made this your issue?’ What... Is she insinuating that only women are allowed to have an opinion regarding trans kids? Well ofcourse she is.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 01:43 PM
3

Men are less willing to spend money on hygiene products, and is more often price concious than women are. That's why female products often cost more, in addition to female products often having higher quality or additives to it (deodorant and razors for examples) that incrases cost. Sadly my stored link to a study regarding it 404'ed, but this isn't controversal in marketing circles. It certainly isn't some conspiracy to fleece women just because they are women, rather that women have been (for …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:43 PM
4

I think you will have a hard time finding anyone here wanting to cruicfy you for fighting for equality in a nuanced way. Many (probably most) here, me included, stand up for womens rights, though we might not agree on what rights are lacking or need to be defended. What many here have a beef with is feminism, where it's womens rights only and often at the cost of men's rights. If you can articulate why you support a womans right, because your moral conviction of the issue and with mens rights in…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 09:57 PM
3

You actually somewhat answered your own question in your second sentence: I honestly thought the definition of a feminist was somebody who cares about gender equality and cares about the problems facing women . ​ Why do you think feminists are so insistant on defining feminism == equality? It's a motte and baily tactic where "equality", something surely everyone agrees upon, is the outer defence for the actions and beliefs they really hold. Often without defining what equality really is, leaving…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 09:13 PM
3

This is the correct way, and a way that is working if you look at Denmark. There, a men's rights group started to send out a monthly information letter to all minister positions, with montly up to date statistics and a "issue of the month" type of deal. It took years before any minister started to notice, but eventually more and more actually read the information in the letter, and now Denmark is doing more and more to stop the inequality and actually listen to those who support men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:54 PM
5

There is a big difference between "most", and overwhelmingly.One is anything above 50%, the other can imply anything from around 66% and up, but often used with 90% and up. I am hard pressed to belive Bettina has at any point said that physical violence is "overwhelmingly" done by only men. And afaik, Bettina's exact point is that male DV victims is so underreported that it is impossible to know the exact number, though it is a lot closer to 50% than anyone wants to acknowledge.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 02:01 AM
12

She also said programs to combat domestic violence unjustly demonised men - despite men overwhelmingly being the perpetrators. They had to have at least one jab at her with a lie, and in so doing, proving her excact point.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 01:39 AM
18

"I worked on the end-FGM campaign, it's a very different issue, a different subject" No.. no it really isn't. That is just an preemptive sentence to bias the viewer, to not compare the two. ​ "how do you know something is missing?" If I cut off your leg/arm/nose/whatever when you were a baby, how would you know something is missing?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:10 PM
4

I appreciate his energy about the topic, and hopefully it will gain some traction to change the view nationally. That said, the numbers he cites has been disputed multiple times, from fairly well sourced places. There are deaths due to it, the numbers just isn't verified independantly enough to cite as fact. There might be more, there might be less. Main problem is that circumcision almost never is writen down as the cause of death, but rather sepsis or other complications. And the cited number …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 04:39 PM
28

"I have not seen", no, because any man who have been falsely accused you deem worth less than life itself. It's nothing more than how an aristocrat would see the beggars at the poor house, ie they wouldn't unless they were in their way.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:56 PM
16

However, van Breen was quick to note that there’s “no evidence that feminists behave more negatively towards men” outside of a psychology research lab. This made me right out laugh. “To sum that up: I don’t think the finding says anything specifically about how these women view men, but rather this is a means to an end: the effect is produced by their desire to counteract the implications of stereotypes,” she explained. Yeah yeah, keep talking bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 04:37 PM
1

Article is from 2016, any idea if there has been any changes to these laws since then?
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:27 AM
7

Regardless of your pun, breast cancer awareness is actually pink (pink ribbon)
/r/MensRights09/12/19 10:24 AM
3

Hi, and welcome to this sub, and MRM as a whole. You have gotten many good replies on your post, and many have covered most of what I wanted to say, but there is a few points: ​ I never understood why it was supposed to be so sad that women were forced to be housewives. Like, I get that their husbands often mistreated them and viewed them as intellectually inferior, but on the flipside every man was forced to work. While there was some women that definetily was forced to be housewives, many, mos…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:03 AM
10

Only if segregating ends up with either half the budget to each, or if both budgets are public and people would actually care if women got more then men. It could quickly become that male services only got 20% of the funds compared to female ones, announced public and noone would care enough to stop it. Sure, boys-only education could be a win if it actually changed to teach boys as best as possible, but if this dystopian future comes to light, do you actually think they wouldn't kneecap it just…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:32 PM
5

The document says: “Blood tests to check your prostate are not needed except for very specific cases. Blood tests can lead to further investigation that may also be unnecessary and can cause anxiety.” I have to read the underlying NHS plans to get more info around this, but in itself it isn't a bad thing. Mammograms have also come under fire lately as there are way too many false positives, and patients worrying about nothing. Not using a medical procedure / test any longer is not the same as no…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:50 PM
57

So.. thats the MeToo movement both in USA and India being started by a fake story.. And probably many more countries.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:45 PM
1

ehhh... Link is correct, the embedded video is tooooootally wrong. ​ Edit: Oh I see what you did. You linked to a favorites list. If you click the link under the title, you come to number 2 on the list, but the embedded player is playing the first video in your favorite list.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:53 AM
3

I never hear of men losing sleep in this way No, because a man complaining about such a thing, or anything really would be mocked and dumped. That women are granted the free reign to complain for any minor issue, while men has to shut up about it, does not equate to only women experiencing problems. edit: I don’t hear of men lying awake running through their successes and failures as a parent/employee/friend/responsible citizen and resolving to do better next time before going on to compile tomo…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 08:47 PM
7

Paywalled, anyone got the full article?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:06 PM
3

Why? logic I guess, it's fairly obvious when you know the facts. For me it was a gradual shift, from merely scoffing at ridiculous claims by feminists, to actually be part of men right groups localy. I've had three incidents that have shifted my view that way over the years, the first two incidents was long before I started to get into mens rights, but the last in addition to my sisters feminist claims was probably the one that pushed me "over the edge" so to speak, and actually standing up publ…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 03:03 PM
2

As a psych major Ah, that clearly explain you'r unweavering belief in the nutjob worldview of feminist theory. You have gotten repeated facts for each and every delusion you have, but you still kontinue to portray the community of MensRights, or men as a whole as the ones ignorant and hateful. I would have told you do read thoroughly through the plentiful and detailed responses you have gotten here, and reevaluate your (wrong) perception of the world, but realistically it is impossible to ask so…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:29 PM
55

Magistrates told Griffiths: 'The complainant's evidence was very clear, logical and without embellishment. We can think of no motivation for you to touch the victim other than sexual. What evidence? Were there pictures of him doing it ? or is all the evidence what she said happened? I'm guessing he will be just another suicide statistic if he actually gets a sentence from this.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:36 PM
8

I've never heard about PIE or the Liberty group and what they stand for, but that paragraph itself doesn't seem too bad on the face of it. How they interpreted it, or wanted to implement it I don't know. As I read it, it wants the context of the photos to be taken into account and not to be declared illegal just because it has a naked child on it. Take for example a picture of a child in a bath, if you argue against the above paragraph, you argue that such a photo should be illegal. Do it do any…
/r/MensRights28/09/19 10:58 AM
2

Let's rewind half a decade, how is less women having the grades, or even the will to get a higher education a women rights issue?
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:41 AM
7

And almost 4/5 of non-sheltered homeless is men
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:06 PM
2

​ that the majority of models are female...thus, an extreme gap in a birds-eye view of annual pay doesn't necessarily mean that men are being paid less, just that they're earning less. Most of the model work is for female models, but most models are also female so there shouldn't be any discrepancy just based on what gender does the job the most. I get what you are thinking, that female models just do more gigs than men and thus has higher yearly income, and that might be true to some extent, bu…
/r/MensRights23/09/19 06:09 PM
6

Male models are paid substantially less. The pay gap also extends to the modeling rank-and-file. Female models make an average of $41,300 annually, which is 148% more than the men, who earn an average of about $28,000, according to data from Payscale.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:02 PM
1

The MeToo movement didn't start with good intentions. It probably was good intentions by some of the people helping it trend but Alyssa Milano who started it can't be said to have anywhere near pure intentions. The creator of this movement started it specifically for low income communities which I assume is because they could not afford legal fees/a lawyer. Where does this come from? If it's regarding Tarana Burke, few are claiming that it was part of the same movement, or the start of it. It wa…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:26 PM
10

All these things are stereotypical what women do, not men, with the one exception being number #2 on the list.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:00 PM
6

DuckDuckGo Well, I tried just to see what hits I got. Lets just say it was a particular category on pornhub and the like that came up.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:33 PM
1

49.something % UK is 49.2% if I recall.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:13 PM
4

Both are not surprising as that is the narrative parroted by the media. Most people just skim the news and pick up little bits of it here and there, and where they look it is almost always portrayed falsely.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:27 PM
1

Got the study freely available? Remember skimming it when it came out but forgot to save it.. And too lazy to search if you have it bookmarked :) Don't remember it showing that companies took a hit to profit, but remember it concluded that board expertise dropped due to the requirement.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:20 PM
15

He means the title "15 year old boy gets his 28 year old teacher pregnant" ie, the boy was the acting party and caused the pregnancy, not that the woman raped the boy.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:24 PM
0

Yes the US dwarfs every single EU country in population, but it also dwarfs everyone in number of cases. The only thing they don't dwarf them in is number dead per incident (seeing as it's hard to kill the same % of population, my point above) Secondly, any statistician knows you have to have a sample size large enough to draw any valuable conclusions from it. A single event is not enough do draw any conclusion, except for those who willfully use it to fit their narrative despite it shortcomings…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:28 PM
-1

The numbers are massively skewed for smaller countries that has had few / singular events, for example Norway. There has been 1 (one) mass shooting in Norway since 1950's, and it skews the numbers for the 2009-2015 period used massively. To argue that mass shootings are more likely to happen in Norway than in the US (that has multiple a month, up to one a day depending on classification) is fallacious. If the US was to have a mass shooting with the same statistical impact as the one in Norway, t…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:46 PM
3

Same in Spain if I remember correctly.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 04:34 PM
7

If you have enough scholars, you can define anything as anything. Doesn't make it true though. : organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests That is a more apt definition. Also the Wiki entry gives a bit more context: Feminism is a range of social movements, political movements, and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes The define bit is especially crucial here. If I define equal…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:33 AM
3

One word.. delusional.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 06:50 AM
3

My behavior never changed at this point. I didn’t suddenly become clingy, possessive, or high-maintenance. But either quickly or eventually, they’d do a dramatic 180 and go from being very thoughtful to acting fully apathetic. They’d still want to see me, but they’d stop acting like it. Sure thing love, never your fault.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:09 PM
2

June 2017.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:09 PM
4

Boys do that shit, but that doesn't make this situation right either. In many cases we need to defend the boys right to usual boy stuff from people misconstruing every action they do as harmfull, but this isn't one of those cases. If a neighbor sits in their own back garden that is walled off, they have some expectancy of privacy. Even men can wander around nude in their back garden if that is what they want. Had it been the front garden, or a beach or something I would 100% agree, but not here.…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:22 AM
15

Or any other news organization.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:39 AM
11

Talking from personal experience actually bringing up these subjects in political and social forums IRL (not in the US, just fyi), if those you are talking to do not identify as feminists most just don't care in the long term. It goes "oh that sounds horrible" and forgotten the next moment. Feminists always responds with comparing it to women / changing it to what about women. Those few that you actually are willing to do something about it politically (coming forth as in support for the case, o…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:02 AM
4

That is not a report if a country is gender neutral, that is a report of wither women have equal or superior rights than men. Even Denmark has some laws that favours women, and that is a country that reject most of feminism
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:06 PM
3

What's the name of the book? My German is a bit rusty, but that might be as good an excuse as any to brush up on it
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:49 PM
1

Religions usually are incompatible with other religions.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:54 PM
1

You are likely to not have to join if you don't want to, but if they have made up their minds you don't have a choice. I went through 3 appeals for not having to serve, and got the message that I could face jail of I didn't turn up.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 12:30 PM
3

She must be mentally unstable, you just can't have such a screwed up world view not to be.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:10 PM
2

I'll look more thoroughly through that link later, but from skimming it, it seems like it has the same underlying flaw that much DV statistics has, that men rarely reports violence against them, even when it is severe and especially not when it is from a spouse or partner. Studies that has queried both genders has shown that women self identify as an abuser and the initiator of violence just as much or more than men (the 70% non-reciprocal). That was based in the US though. That men are stronger…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 03:53 PM
2

You argued against a point I wasn't making, that is afaik a straw man argument no? I never said (in the above post) that we don't need feminism, at any point. I said that there wasn't any systemic sexism against women, I don't see how you interpreted that to me saying we don't need feminism (we don't, but I never said that in the first post you referenced) I also never said that women, on individual bases doesn't have struggles, or even have some aspects of life that could be better. I'm saying …
/r/MensRights27/04/19 03:18 AM
2

So you are claiming that smaller and less evolved societies has less, or even no cultural gender pressure... Seems like you are implying that the gender differences is due to western culture alone, and not something that has been an intrinsic part of humans for as long as we have existed. What societies don't have genders? or gender roles? I would like to read up on them as I have not heard of such an society. Also, how do you conform this notion with the fact that more egalitarian nations like …
/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:01 PM
1

Straw man much? Where did I say under the law specifically ? I said systemic sexism. And I never said we didn't need feminism because we are equal under the law (I think we don't need feminism of other reasons but that is a different discussion) But anyway, men aren't equal under the law, or in some cases the interpretation of the law. That what this sub repeatedly discusses, and if you have been here any time at all should have picked up on that. Look at the sidebar, examples are protection fro…
/r/MensRights26/04/19 11:14 AM
2

In a hypothetical society where gendered socialization practices and cultural pressures are swapped, we'd instead see women doing 90% of this kind of grueling work. Wait... in a hypothetical society you see this gender swap.. first, how was this hypothetical study conducted? Secondly, why don't we see this in the few tribes that has had an actual matriarchy? I take hard facts over hypothetical any day of the week.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:09 AM
1

I got a tingling feeling that those researchers wanted a confirmation on their previous hypothesis / beliefs more than doing objective research. They classify stereotypical gender roles as sexist in themselves, not on why people want it. They also don't seem to realise the significance of earlier births. That is the one major income change between men and women, and the earlier it is the larger the income impact later in life. Now, according to these researchers, it's up to them to classify all …
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:00 AM
10

The mental hoops they go through to continue to never see males as victims is as always staggering and hard to wrap a sane mind around. Also I'm not quite aboard on the notion that he is trying to convey is the only reason. That men can't express their feminine side and that is why the inequality is increasing. I see it as masculine traits in females is ok and encouraged by feminists, but masculine traits in men are attacked. Yes there are less favorable traits of masculinity, but feminists atta…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 04:20 PM
4

Elevator on the side of the steps maybe?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:52 PM
10

Black I rarely see, but Asian is fairly common on long haul flights from Europe (cutting wage costs by not hiring from the European side of the flight) If you are in the US the picture is probably a bit different.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 08:57 AM
5

What country? Scandinavia has approx twice the prostate cancer numbers, than those of breast cancer. I'm guessing there might be some discrepancy on reporting the death as caused by prostate cancer due do it being fairly slow killing.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:11 PM
38

in their report, titled “Still a Man’s Labor Market.” Well if that isn't a flag that it is a sexist piece of garbage report, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:19 AM
2

Those kinds of automation is most definitely in the works. Also the writing of wills and the like is going to be automated very soon, and cut the price by a magnitude.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 01:45 AM
7

Duluth model, in it's different incarnations around the western world, would like to argue against that assertion. The officer himself might not be SJW in any form, but when the laws are written such that the male is seen as the perpetrator and the female is the victim, he has to follow the law.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 07:24 AM
0

Please cite your sources, preferably one with proof and not just gossip most likely out to smear Depp. This is exactly the issue we time and again talk about here, unsubstantiated gossip is made to hang out individuals and ruin their life, and people believe out without checking for any proof
/r/MensRights19/03/19 06:02 PM
22

Not arresting is not the same as not believing women. It's just (for now) not enough proof that they did it, our rather enough proof that they didn't. And claimed rape can not be seen as yet to be sentenced rapist, people lie and you have to prove it was the case Now, how many women are arrested for the same thing?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:27 PM
13

Wasn't there a post a little while back where some site claimed women was disproportionately affected?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:26 AM
6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBh411DIPRA Think its this one. Also found this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pdnkbs4l_g Australia is even worse than I thought. It's all about women, don't care about men.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:17 PM
0

I get where you come from, I really do. I would probably say the same thing in anger, but it isn't a good solution. Just as women liberation on the cost of men only cause problems, the inverse is also the case. Lets get a solution that is good for both parties, not a zero sum game where one side has to loose everything for the other to gain something. ​
/r/MensRights10/03/19 08:17 PM
1

And making paternity fraud victims having to pay doesn't make sense either. Just because the system is abused one direction today doesn't mean it should swing the other direction either. Now granted, I think there are a point where you should be able to force a woman to carry children to birth, though I don't know where exactly that point is. On the one side, you should keep the woman's right to bodily control, on the other hand you have to take into account the fathers rights (that he should ha…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 07:41 PM
2

Exactly my experience too. Individual articles, but nothing substantial in forms of statistical numbers. And I agree wholeheartedly that even one death is too much, just that if using the 100+ deaths you will probably be dismissed instantly because that number is insanely high for something we can't document.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:37 AM
24

it could have some far reaching consequences; one of those being: what happens if a female rape victim has to give birth to a baby conceived with the rapist because he wants the child? The inverse is true today (not universally, but many places), if a male rape victim impregnates the rapist, he is still liable for child support. Personally I don't think it is right to force women to have a child, at least not during the normal abortion period, but I think it is a discussion we should have to fin…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:51 AM
1

Oh I think we all agree (both in this thread and the other where this subject arose yesterday). There is severely lacking in reporting, and often its the secondary causes that can be reported (ie, died from infection rather than what caused the infection). In some way it is correct to list the complication as cause of death, not the reason for the complication in itself. For example, if you are having an appendix operation, they don't write bad appendix as the cause if you die from complications…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:48 PM
2

Yeah I know it's a black hole statistics and tracking wise, and that it is in many peoples favor (doctors performing etc) not to register it. We need better data for sure, but until we have, all we can do is demand more studies and keep bringing it up as a problem and hinting to how severe it can and is (ie, boys die from it but we don't know the numbers as there is no interest in finding out) I just don't want me or other to use numbers and stats we can't stand behind and defend against scrutin…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:18 AM
5

I belive it is mentioned somewhere in this blog or it's links: http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/ I also remember some numbers along those lines, though I'm not sure about the exact figures. There is no place where FGM is performed, where MGM isn't also performed. But the invers is not true. Also, my above statement was regarding US specifically, I see now that it wasn't perfectly clear from my commen…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:15 AM
1

Don't jump on that statistics too fast. I too was outraged when I first read it, and used in my arguments, but my own research has shown that the numbers is hard to replicate from other sources, and I have so far not found enough evidence to adequately justify it as a fact. The number is based on Bollinger's research "lost boys", and it has it's flaws. He extrapolates the death numbers by comparing boys who die against girls, not taking into other factors that causes a higher mortality rate with…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:43 AM
17

and hundreds of baby boys die every year because of it This is in contention. There is only one source (CIRP) that claims that many boys are dying because of it, and the sources for it isn't exactly good. Some boys die, there is some stories floating around, and there is probably some that die but are never directly linked to circumcision. But in general the statistics isn't there to claim it as facts. If anyone has some statistics that back CIRP up, please link and infor me. ​
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:18 AM
29

A common misconception that is pushed by feminist (and religious performers of circumcision). The most common ways of female circumcision is in cases even less intrusive than male circumcision (nicking of the clitoris hood or outer labia) The studies that proclaim the benefits is also dubious and not scientifically rigorous enough to be taken as facts, and even IF there is a small benefit, non intrusive treatment with antibiotics and other normal medical treatment is more than enough to have the…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:20 AM
6

Already heard that one, multiple times. Though it has been a while since the last time now.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:10 AM
1

I agree with you, I just think the best course of action is to have a scientific foundation that takes as many variables as possible into account. The value for MRM is even greater if any possible flaws and counterpoints are removed or resolved. I'm interested in these for the same reason as you, to counter feminists when they say men are the only ones violent, abusive etc no matter what the circumstance. These numbers gives us facts to say, women are also flawed humans and is violent at times, …
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:16 PM
1

yeah access to children is definitely a factor in it , though it doesn't seem like this report takes that into account at all. Have seen some others reports talk about it, but don't have any concrete info from them that I remember. Hence why I'm asking for more analysis of the data. The last we want to do is misuse the data when it doesn't take everything into account (Though that would be very hard to do) ​
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:51 PM
3

Sixty-nine percent of victims are maltreated by a mother, either acting alone (40.8%) or with a father and/or nonparent (28.2%). Quite interesting how prevailing mothers are. If you look at the tables 3-17 (for violence) and table 4-4 (for fatalities.) Numbers are the percentage: Abuse / Maltreatment: Father - 21.5 Father and Nonparent(s) - 1.2 Mother - 40.8 Mother and Nonparent(s) - 6.8 Mother and Father - 20.4 Mother, Father, and Nonparent - 1.0 Total Parents - 91.6 Child fatalities: Father - …
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:38 PM
2

That was the outcome I came to also, though I must admit I question whether real cases are recorded under other death causes and not linked to circumcision due to different reasons. One hypothesis is that they don't correlate to it, as circumcision is so common they don't factor that in as a cause. Religious and tradition might also bias the conclusion of the doctor writing down cause of death. I came over some papers mentioning there was a spree of boys in the UK that was hospitalized and near …
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:46 PM
2

I had a discussion regarding deaths from circumcision in the US not long ago. Seems like the only hard numbers out there is the ones from CIRP, and those was called into question and stated it was discredited, by among others this paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3503386/ Do you (or other) know of studies that can give a proper statistics on how many dies yearly ? I tried to find other sources with hard numbers, but could not find any at the time, the only one was stating "it …
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:03 PM
6

“I don’t agree that this is reverse sexism,” she said Nah, its just straight up sexism. No reverse kind here.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:39 AM
2

A bit surprised on the last section, men reporting perpetrating aggression of different kinds more often than reporting being victims of it. I was of the impression from other things I have read that especially psychological aggression was more perpetrated by women than men. Wonder how important the second paragraph is impacting this, ie, men not seeing it as a problem when wives is doing it and thusly under-reporting it even in these reports .
/r/MensRights02/02/19 05:55 PM
2

STEM will never reach an equilibrium in numbers unless you discriminate much more against men than they do even today. Men are just more likely to go for those fields than women are due to innate interests. The same with senators and congressors, republicans just don't discriminate against men just to get women into positions of power.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:11 PM
6

Highly sexist divorce legislation Probably a leftover byproduct of traditional family structure One that feminists are fighting tooth and nail to defend as is (or even amplify). Saying it originates from a traditional family structure I might even agree with, though that doesn't make it good or fair, and MRA are fighting to have it changed, feminists are against it. How is normal mental health services insufficient for dealing with male-specific problems? How is normal mental health services ins…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:33 AM
1

Same in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the UK as far as I am aware. Probably a lot other countries too.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:33 PM
1

Yeah I know the US has a very large issue with it, and while it is in issue elsewhere to it's nowhere as prevalent as in the US. And the reasons why is several, from imprisoning fathers for minor offences, to some women hating men but want children and "marrying" the government instead for money. I'm all aware of those issues, and those are issues to be combated in itself. But my thought is what consequence will the proposed law have, both in the US and other western countries (both regardless o…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:37 PM
1

Agreed 100%. Hopefully this is something that will come to my and other countries sooner than later. Though I am still not certain it will bring only good with it. As they say in the clip, it might be more taxing on the state if father steps away from his economical responsibilities (and he should have that option). I think the possible financial support from the state should be limited, so that a mother has to choose herself if she wants to go through with it alone, rather than think she can ju…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:38 PM
3

Care to elaborate on what Peterson is hilariously wrong on? I don't care much for his religious exploration, though I understand some of the moral underpinnings he is trying to investigate/discuss, but except that I can't on top of my head recollect anything I have seen from him that is just flat out wrong.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:43 PM
5

You don't really deserve to get down voted, as while you have the wrong conclusion, it isn't malicious (I think) and you need info instead of berating. As others had said, please look up more research on the subject, I would have linked but in on mobile atm. Most "benefits" are a myth or negligible compared to the risks and disadvantages it brings. And the reduce infection myth specifically, why cut off something that can be treated with antibiotics if it ever were to happen?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:31 AM
2

Argentina's special gender violence prosecutor Veronica Guagnino will come up with the topics for discussion. So sadly that is not an option. They will most likely be the usual feminist subjects, totally without factual basis ofc.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 09:09 AM
4

Think at least one of them is linked somewhere here on the subreddit. CDC / NCVS data shows it, but you have to look at the raw data to get something useful as the organisations itself apparently still are on the "female are the only victims" route. I know I have some of the studies saved at home, but a quick search found this article: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/ ​ Also found this on my saved posts: https://www.re…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:04 AM
2

The numbers on male rape victims are highly variable as few wants to study the subject, and those that do is attacked by feminists so it's hard to get funding and the size needed to get super accurate numbers. So in the end it is really hard to say what gender is most often victims, though there are coming out more articles and more studies showing that is much more equal than you would think. If you only take victims of violent rape out on the town, yeah then I could see how the numbers (as we …
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:19 AM
15

My thought exactly. I really wish someone in a child support case to bring up this ruling and use it if they can. if it is "morally unacceptable to regard a child as a financial liability," mothers can no longer demand money from the fathers as they should just be happy they have a child and let that be it's own reward (at least that is what I took from the wording of Lord Justice David Richards in the above mentioned case. ​
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:48 PM
24

Did you read the article? But it is now known to cause some 2,000 male cancers annually, resulting in the deaths of about 650 men a year, mainly from mouth and throat forms of the disease. So it affects men at a lower but still significant rate. Also gay men has no protection from the virus
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:58 PM
1

Thanks the same.. He might very well be that he has talked about it in some cases. I have only watched his show the last few weeks and some of the "change my mind" segments before that. Would love to hear from someone that is a regular listener for a while to chime in, if our perception is correct or way off
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:55 PM
2

Think we have about the same perception of Steven. I agree with some of his stances (though he takes it a bit far at times) on how to "be a man", in the personality traits and how to conduct yourself, but that is personality traits, not the societal issues that MRM tries to do something about. Sure there is a bit of overlap, for example in defending against "all men" accusations, but other than that the personality of an individual and societal issues is separated. I think he kinda lumps MRM wit…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:44 PM
6

It's his platform but not his article or notion. Crowder himself I feel is more anti MRM (though pro male), as he goes the more "grow up, stand up for youself" route as the answer. He still furiously attacks the nuts that are directly hostile to men, but he just don't talk much about issues that is the focal point of MRM. I might be wrong, just my perception of him from the videos I have watched.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:36 AM
2

Without steroids, probably. Though with nothing else to do than work out for 6-9 months, and a personal trainer every day that helps him out and gives nutritional advice / supplements (like, genuine supplements, not steroids)
/r/MensRights19/11/18 11:28 AM
3

To go to school, to work, to have an own income was forbidden by men what countries? in what time periods? Going to school is the most true one, but for most men it wasn't an option either and wealthy women had more education than the average male. Work and having own income was not illegal for women in most countries and time periods, though men in places and time periods had the financial and legal responsibilities of what women in their family did so socially it was looked down upon women hav…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:03 AM
23

There are another study out there with quite a large dataset that showed that women was behind aprox 70% of the unilateral violence. So this study lines up with it fairly well and is just another confirmation of it. I'm not really surprised that the numbers are much higher in university than general populous though, as the indoctrination nowadays is heightened with "women can't do no wrong", and if a woman hits a man it's because he deserved it mantra.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:26 PM
16

Both catchphrases are wrong, both in it's factual description and in the implicated reasoning. It's a nonsensical sentence thought up by feminists to place upon their values and demonization of the male gender.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:21 PM
25

No the past wasn't "male". That is a moronically simplistic way to put it, not to mention historical negationism.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:02 PM
5

I don't disagree with you at all really, but my point is this. If we are going to post any and all articles that are writing this kind of shit, we won't do anything but be enraged all the time and it won't help out cause and is only getting our blood pressure up. I don't know how popular that site is, but my impression is that it isn't exactly a high traffic site. If I see more mainstream sites start to pick that article up and repeat it as facts I will be more laud about it, or if I meet indivi…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:36 PM
7

Except from pointing out all the factually wrong things throughout the article, I don't care much for this article in this subreddit. It's from a bad writer that should know better, but it really isn't related to male rights in today's society, or any political event / media piece against male rights of today. It's dishonest, but lets first get upset about it if it gains traction in mainstream media.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:20 PM
4

An interesting article for sure, it's nice to see som dissenting opinions on the feminist side. I think we should be careful not to ignore and be dismissive of articles and opinions that are more nuanced and on the face of it more open to a genuine discussion about both genders and seeing our point of view. If we say we don't care when the rational arguments of the feminist movement comes out, then dismissing our objection to their insanity is easy as they see we won't even hear out their more r…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 09:07 PM
2

Death in worst case scenario (sepsis), though more common is damage to nerves or other abnormalities with the penis due to the operation. I usually refer to this every time the subject comes up, though not specifically about male circumcision risks, it has quite a lot of useful information: http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:01 AM
3

Don't think I have seen a more textbook example of a no true Scotsman fallacy. As long as those true feminist you speak of don't call out those that are sexist and refuse to accept their participation under the feminist banner, and instead cheer them on as it empowers them, then in practical terms there is no difference between a "true" feminist and those that according to you have co-opted the term.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 08:37 PM
1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/ I was thinking about the UK one. I see that in the US the numbers is a bit higher: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/ ​ But yeah, I agree that there is a distinction between those that are sympathetic to feminism, and maybe call themselves feminist if asked about it, and those that are feminist activists that are the real cause for the lawmaking and blatant misand…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:41 PM
1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/ I was thinking about the UK one. I see that in the US the numbers is a bit higher: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/ ​ But yeah, I agree that there is a distinction between those that are sympathetic to feminism, and maybe call themselves feminist if asked about it, and those that are feminist activists that are the real cause for the lawmaking and blatant misand…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:40 PM
4

It still is afaik. Latest I heard was that only 7% or so of females that identify as feminists. Problem is those that are sympathetic to feminism, those are in the majority.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:12 PM
6

Well, I wouldn't call it reverse sexism either, just plain sexism. I'm guessing that was what you meant, unless you mean that men doesn't experience sexism?, in which case I'm curious about your position to the subject.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 10:25 AM
11

It is true that men and boys are harmed by the insistence that all male people be masculine. True, too, that it hurts for all members of a group to be judged by the actions of a violent minority. Nevertheless, these are the conditions upon which the perpetuation of male supremacy relies. ie - "we know it hurts the majority of men, but we just don't care". Also, isn't there a definition for blaming the group for the actions of the few? And it never have become anything good from that mindset. I s…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 10:00 AM
2

Yeah I read some more about it and understand that it is a correct interpretation of the law in that state. Also quite interesting read about the born alive rule. I still don't agree on the change in law, and would argue for the old interpretation with the only change of instead of at birth, the change is when its viable (corresponding with when you can't abort anymore) Though in the end, from reading quotes from the perpetrator where he said he just couldn't have another child, this would proba…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:18 AM
27

Manishkumar Patel, 45, was convicted in August of attempted first-degree intentional homicide of an unborn child. His girlfriend didn't ingest the drink, but miscarried weeks later. ​ She got pregnant with Patel's child in August 2007 and Patel then promised he would commit to her, the complaint said. The woman had a miscarriage on Sept. 30, 2007, the complaint said. ​ So still well within the period where she could take an abortion without problems. I'm not saying it's ok that he unbeknownst to…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 07:50 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless According to Merriam it is, though I get your point and should have used another word.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 10:42 PM
3

Agreed that it is worth pointing out the double standards, but if that is all we do we don't get anywhere. When we see that kind we should be vocal about it to the paper or the general public when they talk about it / see the article, as it's their mind we have to change. If we post only that kind here, we will just be whining about it within our own bauble. And it doesn't help with recruiting new people, if most post they see when they come here is us bitching about these kinds of things, inste…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:45 PM
29

If they only had stopped when talking about having a safety net for yourself in case you have to leave your partner, irregardless of the gender. But of course it had to be gendered in the end. "funny" part of it is, if a man tries to keep money back from the relationship for have his own emergency fund, they cry out about him not trusting and trying to steal from the relationship and whatnot. All that said, let's not continue to dive into poor videos like this just for the anger points but inste…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:42 PM
1

Excluding medical procedures that has to be done to rectify problems, there are no benefits to circumcisions. And if there are, they are equal benefits to circumcise women. ​ http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:42 AM
2

I think it is very few that wants to stop this just because it's jews / muslims that performs it. In the way of "i just want to take something away from you out of spite". As jews and muslims are the only one (afaik?) that performs it, and only does it because religious beliefs / traditions, the go to defense from any left wing party is that you are a racist. No matter what your reason for wanting it gone is. Yes stopping it unproportionately affects those cultures, but that is because just thos…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:37 AM
7

Think he means walk away from the party, find someone else to represent your view (independent or whatnot)
/r/MensRights03/10/18 01:37 AM
18

She is definitely making money on this, in addition to the "fame" that comes with it. If that is the driving factor for why she is now doing this is uncertain.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:58 PM
17

This looked so familiar to another BBC article that was posted a few months ago, that I had to double check the date. "Prison is a negative experience for everyone, but it is particularly distressing for women," says its chief executive, Frances Crook. Sure it is, because everything is always worse for women. "They typically have more complex needs than men. They are more likely to be victims of abuse, and more likely to have been sentenced for offending related to their exploitation by a partne…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:12 PM
2

https://archive.is/Juesi
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:01 PM
5

They normally can, but there is a chance that it is not possible when they try. Also depends on how long time it has been between the operation and the reversal.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:05 AM
3

See my other reply to the post itself for a bit more info on the different aspects. TLDR regarding the domestic violence shelters, it was a law passed that required municipalities to offer both to males and females equally, but feminists was publicly against it, especially those already affiliated with some shelter organisations as they claimed / feared it would diminish the help for women, that women would be afraid to seek help if they knew men also could get help, etc, or that money for men's…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:14 PM
6

Going after the family? Those Quora claims are nonsense, and if you are talking about DV shelters in Norway, that was not due to feminism.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:19 PM
20

Feminism has done none of those things, Norway's political consensus has, often in direct opposition to what feminism wanted. Or it was an unintended consequence of the law (seen from the feminist standpoint). This is a clear cut case of feminist taking credit for things they did not do. Just look at how he writes "we changed the law" as if they (feminists) unilaterally decided to change them. Previously rape was defined so that only female victims and only male perpetrators were recognized. Tha…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:18 PM
6

But is that only those that are apparently fake, or even the "good ones" ? Ie, do you like bigger than usual boobs as long as you can't identify them as fake?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:38 PM
7

Thanks for your insight. Keep your head up, it might feel like a loosing battle but eventually (we hope) the world will return to sanity.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:15 PM
9

https://web.archive.org/web/20180807172244/http://www.journalinquirer.com/connecticut_and_region/anti-circumcision-group-protests-at-manchester-intersection/article_3bb19b18-9a58-11e8-9eed-bf495da8a1b4.html Archive link for those like me that get 451 error because we are in EU and GDPR...
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:19 AM
15

Hope noone down-vote you for what is a genuine question. As many other has said in other replies, there is only risk and no genuine benefits to do it except that it is a cultural norm and personal taste. My question would be, do you think the same about female circumcision/mutilation? This blog goes a bit deeper into what male circumcision can bring in terms of complications, along with a comparison to female variant. http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-mal…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:15 AM
2

"Fight for their nation" is not just against external forces, it is also a notion against division within the country itself. As for defending the country from external forces, you still need troops to defend your borders, as nukes will not safeguard a nation alone. Without troops willing to fight the enemy at the border, the only option with nukes is to nuke your own country if (when) the enemy gets troops inland. As for domestically, it's both in regards to divisions between more local communi…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:40 PM
2

Don't polarize. It doesn't help to label anyone a SJW just because they don't find Trump palpable. And by stating that he only has his opinion from the MSM removes all agency for him to make up his own mind based on all available factors, and you put everyone into only two booths. Either you are 100% left wing, or you are 100% right wing. I think Trump is a bloody idiot that rambles on, have dementia and countless other issues. That doesn't mean I don't think some of his policies are correct, or…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:10 AM
6

It's hard for men to be nationalists in a nation that mistreats and despises them. This.... Slightly off topic of this thread, but I heard an argument recently that growth of "feminism" and attack on the core family has been at least a correlating cause why societies up through the ages has failed. Ie, societies was too good for itself, leading to men not having the drive to keep the society cohesion stable anymore. Women liberation and attack on masculinity was apparently a big part of this, in…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 09:44 AM
1

I think at 16 the person is not mentally developed enough to understand what sex means. What sex itself means, or the possible repercussions if she gets pregnant ? At the age of 16 a large part, if not most girls have reached reproductive maturity, and some are years before this. Unless you equate sex with pregnancy, there is an argument that its ok well before this, and it very much depends on each individual. This does not mean its ok for girls to be exploited by much older men (or exploited a…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 09:18 AM
10

Thanks for that link, saved for later discussions as this always pop up.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 09:36 AM
1

If you take that broad term then I agree with you, it is wrong to stigmatize the group just because of the part that is hateful against women because of it. I can't say I agree with the definition, but I understand your argument if that is your basis.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 10:33 PM
1

I don't have time right now to read through that link, so I just skimmed it. I'll get back to it when I can though. (a guy who cant get laid is incel remember) Might be me that has a bit different perception of incel than you, and maybe it's a wrong one. My understanding of Incels isn't one that can't get laid, it's one that resents and blames women because of it. The healthy thing I think would be to self reflect and question why does they not see value in me as a person and try to better yours…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:46 PM
1

Hmm. I think I get where you are coming from. If I recall he has mentioned predatory women once or twice, but his whole shtick is about men standing up for themselves and do what they can to see a purpose in their life. I feel its more his focus on that instead of denouncing the women in particular, though he often takes feminists out with the trash. Not trashing women but focusing on men issues I feel is a good thing, we don't need trashing just because, other can and will do that. The whole In…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 07:46 PM
1

I'm curious where you got that notion? Care to link me to a video? I have seen a few of his videos and while he favors a traditional courtship (or rather, that we don't know how to work as a society yet as the courtship rules changes so fast these days), I can't remember him saying women is naive victims. Might be that I'm just not understanding what you are referring to here.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 06:10 PM
3

I have been doing the same, and lately trying to write it down in a concise maner to have available in cases like this. Do you have any "library" of the claims you have debunked? I'm curious what theories that has thousands relevant critics for example. Should get all this stuff archived (and we have somewhat in the FAQ)
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:46 PM
4

Yeah wholly agree, difference between stating a possible outcome and getting mad about that hypothetical. Just saying it is a possibility as they have done it at least once before, and called out for it to happen a lot more times. Lets hope not, but we will see. Guess it depends on the appeal and if that will change anything.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:39 PM
1

The Nordic Gender Equality Paradox is a lesson in market-oriented feminism." Says it all really.. Basically, women has it too good being mothers so we have to remove their social helping so that business can make more money.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:21 PM
12

Can almost expect the judge to be attacked and removed from office for not having given the "correct" sentence.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:55 PM
1

Hi, and thanks for the encouraging words and believing in the cause so vigorously. I want anyone to stand their ground and talk about MRA, as for most cases employers don't care as long as you work hard (and they don't have a too radical HR department). And even if you get targeted, most can find a new place to work, or live if it is bad enough. And I do think more MRA's and agreeing friends and acquaintances have to go into the breach so to speak and make it a more public and hopefully accepted…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:51 PM
1

I like his videos, but as stated earlier, this has nothing to do with men's rights really...
/r/MensRights29/06/18 07:33 PM
1

Must say, luckily I have not needed it (yet)
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:29 PM
12

Courts would also have the discretion to stop the direct cross-examination where domestic violence was alleged, and would be required to put in place extra protections for alleged victims — including screens or video links in court rooms — where questioning was allowed to occur. Where questioning is allowed, it would have to be done by a lawyer, including legal aid lawyers where an alleged abuser does not have their own representation. "In those circumstances, cross-examination can and should pr…
/r/MensRights28/06/18 03:05 PM
7

I don't get it either. From reading the first page it seems like they have only looked at behavior and gender differences for convictions. Now there is a bias against men in the convictions that should be fought against, but I don't see this study as that bad from the little I have read so far. Its from 2013, it says nothing about increase in violence, and it sums up the reality fairly well: The majority of violent crimes are perpetrated by a small number of persistent violent offenders, typical…
/r/MensRights23/06/18 12:02 PM
24

There is a huge difference between gender swapping a single character in a cast of multiple roles, and what is on the agenda these days where they have to swap out all leading roles with women. I have no issue with swapping a characters gender for whatever reason, though the character should be somewhat rewritten to reflect that gender change, but I can not think of a single movie where the feminist agenda has been in play that is any good.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:45 AM
19

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/penis-facial_us_5b02df5be4b0463cdba4a6fa Not the whole genitals but specifically Korean baby's foreskin. quick google gives you about 432,000 hits. Edit: -snip-. I got heated, lets stick to the facts and let you make your own opinion
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:26 PM
1

Hmm, never thought about that, using LBQT stats to show a (possible) correlation on what male numbers should be.. I'll have to look that up. Don't happen to have some reports to link to that shows this explicitly ?
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:44 PM
3

Agreed very much with her points. We need more videos (and people) of this kind.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:05 PM
13

Also male victims are not likely to report their partner violence as society is so twisted that they will be ridiculed and looked down on if they do. Also many men don't see a woman acting out throwing shit and hitting as violence before they actually manage to hurt you (most cases they dont). So I would take even those statistics that show a larger portion of male victims with a grain of salt, it is probably more. And we desperately need more study and data on this, but any scholar that tries g…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:03 PM
3

Oh boy.. I had / have the exact same experience with my sister.First off, a bit of my progress through this and how I see you can argue on a general basis. If you are looking for specific counter arguments against those topics, see other replies or come back with more detailed info of what she said so we can link to sources that debunk those individual claims. Now, I don't know when my sister started agreeing with feminist ideology, and I still don't know how much of it she believes in, but me a…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:01 PM
2

Wish he had it in written format too. If only I could get one of my very feminist acquaintances to hear it from after the parody disclaimer and see how outraged they would be.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:56 PM
2

If I remember correctly, you signing the birth certificate in the hospital is an acknowledgement. So unless you already know something is wrong before the birth, you are screwed.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:00 PM
3

Not read the whole thing yet, but interesting article. I'm especially curious about the underlying data used for this basis. *read more*
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:56 AM
2

It was posted under the title "Because men don’t have relationships, careers, children, health or homes?" before that, 53 upvotes and lots of comments.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:51 PM
2

While I am a fan of parental leave (at least when it's for both parents, not only the mother), I'm doubtful about the implied correlation of parental leave and poverty at least on a overall basis pr country. While parents is more likely to have higher financial strain during child rearing, I would like to see some studies showing that it has a greater impact on the overall poverty level, not just for that single family and child. Especially as the US has huge problems with single parent families…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:48 PM
1

Repost. This article was linked a day or two ago (still in the feed some posts below this)
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:03 PM
5

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. Millennia of woe, yeah just about the whole modern society is because of men. Sure men through the ages has done lots of shitty things, but on a w…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:40 PM
1

Hmm. Yes they are. Feminism is a supremacy movement for women, giving them more power (and money). Now you are saying that someone that would/could reap the benefits are not more likely to join that movement for even bigger "reward", than a man that generally speaking has the opposite experience or women that speak against it and get shunned from the movement. If joining Christianity increased your pay by 30%, would you not join even though you weren't really religious?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:39 PM
5

The "study" that article is based on is hardly worth the paper it's written on. It's so full of just wrong assumptions and mental gymnastics that you have a hard time following how insane it is. Some of the data is still good, but their conclusions is just... ridiculous. The only good thing I can see from that article is that the data utterly debunks the "pay gap", even though they conclude the exact opposite at the end of the study. Work harder and longer, get paid more = Women is oppressed. Co…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:11 PM
5

Marriage is way older than our grandfathers. Conceptually it has existed for thousands of years. But one of the main purposes of it has been to make sure a father don't abandon his family for the pursuit of other females or interest. To make sure he is devoted to his family and their well-being, primarily to secure the life of the woman and children. Now females wants men to still pay and secure their income and lives, without giving anything back long term. They want to consummate and then ditc…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:30 PM
1

I guess it also depends on where you are.. I don't think it is that horrible in Norway (comparably to women that is), but it might be much worse elsewhere. I also have a good friend that raised his twins alone, and went back to work after that and he had no extra issues getting back to work (other than the usual "you haven't worked for x years, why?". might also be because of his work they don't care much.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:18 PM
1

Hmm. Maybe. I see your point that women has it easier in some cases to get back to work after taking care of a child. Probably because that the normal scenario, and they have fought a long time to not have negative treatment after, so they can get back to work again. But that is something they continue to complain about, that they can't get work after pregnancy / child rearing, and statistics show that to still be the case. They (and men) loose the years they don't work and have to start lower a…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:13 PM
6

having sent 15 job applications within six months First off. That is nothing. You can't expect results from that alone. Secondly, he is in the same boat as parents in general, no matter the gender. It's just more often females that is in that role. Now, if you replace Man/Female in these articles and makes it "parent", it gives a better picture. I'm all for mens rights, but this article gives nothing to support the theory that men has it worse than females in hunting for a job (other than his ex…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:43 PM
2

Yeah I understood the mosque, but thanks for clarifying the male toilet. Is it far away? I don't have problem with then being asset different places as long as there is the same availability overall
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:31 PM
3

I remember Sargon of Akkad mentioning someone tried to file hate speech complaints in the UK a while ago. They were laughed out of the building if I remember correctly. So yeah... nothing is going to happen before men gets so far beyond the braking point that we all march in the streets and say its enough with the manipulation of media and law by feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:22 AM
5

Are we sure that there is not a male-only restroom on the other side? This type of signage is clearly some sort of shopping mall, and not all have the male / female restrooms next to each other (typically down the hall or across the hall. ) I am more annoyed that it states "mum-child toilet facilities", instead of "parent -child"... guess fathers can't take their kids alone to the restroom.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:14 AM
1

o.O, I do not remember her voice at all. Had to look through some cutscenes right now just to check it out.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:06 AM
1

yeah for sure, the games was really good. I remember them for the gameplay (one part in perticular where you had snowmobiles and some wolves or something), not that she had tits (though it might at that time have piqued my interest too, even though it was square blocks)
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:17 AM
1

I'm fairly certain I have read some statistics that indicates that both female AND males regularly request female / prefer female medical nurses. Only doctors they prefer is male. But it wasn't to the tune of 1/10 though, as is the case today.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:25 PM
3

But they aren't catching up. Males went from 20 to 25, females from 5 to 7.5 pr 100k. Men suicide rate has marginally steeper lines, and went up 0.05% while female went up 0.025% of the population. Not percentage from previous numbers, but percentage from total number. Yes female has a larger 50% increase based on their initial number, but that is wrong to focus on. The way I see it. If you have $5 and I give you $2.5 , while I give someone else that has $20 twice that of $5. Who did I give the …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:29 AM
2

I actually posted on r/askfeminism myself earlier, until I noticed that that and r/feminist is just echochambers for feminists, that only accepts questions and topics that they can turn into a win for them. All others are banned and downvoted. They are not interested in any discussions at all, and especially not facts or arguments that goes against their narrative. I would just find another subreddit that is actually interested in discussions instead of a throne for their own arguments.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/17 09:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter