OnHodl Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? Agree. So many of these dudes say so many things that are damaging to father's rights. Meanwhile, in other threads about father's rights, these same ding-dongs are saying all the opposite rhetoric that contradicts threads like these. Another argument above said women use their feelings in these family situations, which in his logic makes men better for deciding if she should abort or not. lol. So much for the father's rights argument about fathers having feelings for their families. Contradictio…	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:53 AM
0	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? What logic though? The absurd logic that "equal say" means (for these male arguments) is the never ending crowing that the outcome should always be his way (a 51% vote his way). A. She doesn't want the baby. Men still have the "logical argument' for why he should get to take the baby. B. She does want the baby. Men still have the "logical argument" for why he should get to leave his family high & dry. Interesting how these silly threads of "logical equal say" always lead to his 51% majority vote…	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:44 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? It is interesting how the male argument "equal say" means "the man gets the 51% vote". The truth is, she can take off forever in the night. She has the control, like it or not. This is part of the consequences of fathering children knowing these realities.	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:39 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? It is equal. She gave the birth. He gave the support. The physical and psychological trauma of childbirth don't end at the last day of pregnancy. It's equal.	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:36 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? That makes zero sense. A. The women who have abortions don't care because there is no baby to need the father to help with. B. The women wholesale against abortions (which many men are against) now have to take the consequences for something they never wanted.	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:32 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? Facts are facts in anybody can study them. In fact a woman might be in less in position to make those decisions because her feelings are getting involved Men would be better able to make objective decisions in that case It's interesting when anti-woman rhetoric also undermines other arguments about men and feelings. In another thread crowing about how "feminists deny men have feelings" comments like yours will be completely forgotten as if these arguments about men and feelings don't actually …	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:29 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? ... by male design.	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:22 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? Here is the problem "on the one hand and the other one": A. She decides to carry the baby to term because "I agree, and many men are right: Abortion is murder." Then he decides "Welp, not with MY resources! See ya!" So he gets to abandon half of his DNA for her to deal with. Twenty years later, he comes back to kids who don't trust him and opens wounds trying to get back into their lives. Hm. His priority: Resources before his own children. B. She decides to abort. Even though it was only 2 peop…	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:20 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? That isn't entirely why. There is a whole host of issues surrounding having babies, not just the physical issue. I agree with that other person who says people are saying things just to spread dissent. Purposeful, willful misunderstanding others is not a way to solve problems.	/r/MensRights	05/06/19 06:14 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? A man's "too bad" usually still lets him have his own life if he wants, no child-rearing. I don't have kids, but I know it ends your freedom. Easy to see.	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 05:28 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? A man's "too bad" usually still lets him have his own life if he wants, no child-rearing. I don't have kids, but I know it ends your freedom. It doesn't take deep thinking to see this.	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 05:25 AM
1	When a man has a child he doesn’t want, he’s told “too bad, you knew the potential consequences when you had sex”. Why can’t we use this same argument for women? When men are told too bad, they aren't (usually) being asked to commit full time to fatherhood. That is the difference. She will mostly have no choice once she gives birth.	/r/MensRights	18/05/19 05:23 AM