TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

One-Grade-7092 Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by One-Grade-7092 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It’s a bit more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 09:49 PM
–

She argues in bad faith. Every single time. She also thinks she’s wittier than she actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:58 AM
–

If a woman is “giving a man a chance” she’s not going to treat him as well as she could. Do you think a man would treat a woman who he felt he was giving a chance well? Probably not. Nobody wants to be given a chance and if they feel that’s what’s happening i can see how that could make anyone upset. What you say is ugly men being mean sounds like the ugly man not letting himself be mistreated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:41 PM
–

Eh, this is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:35 PM
–

This is the woman that argued the other day that single mother homes aren’t a detriment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:29 PM
2

Of course that would be the question from the likes of yourself and not how it effects the community as a whole. Have a good day. This is foolishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:59 PM
10

I’m not shocked that you would say this. At all. Plenty of women in the community feel this way. Their actions dictate it. If there was nothing wrong with the culture it would show in the culture with most baby mamas and yet it dosent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:42 AM
1

You keep skipping the part about you saying that tangible benefits aren’t relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:37 AM
1

But you just said tangible benefits are irrelevant to That. You’re also not using any facts just an “if” scenario of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:20 AM
1

But money is tangible and you just said tangible benefits are irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:15 AM
1

If tangible benefits are irrelevant then your money argument dosent stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:13 AM
–

Money dosent equate to comfort. And there’s still no tangible benefit to the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:10 AM
–

Physical intimacy. It’s a physical act. Tangible literally means touchable, physical, solid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:56 AM
–

Emotion isn’t tangible.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:14 PM
–

Not true. Joy isn’t a tangible benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:32 PM
–

Sex is a mutual thing though. Him giving money to her is a one way benifit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:15 PM
1

They weren’t into her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:12 PM
1

Sure but that wasn’t the argument. If you can only attract lazy assholes that says a lot about you. Men who aren’t what describe exist. You can’t get them. It’s a skill issue on your part. Also again if they’re crying then by your own logic you’re also crying. Just like they cry AWALT you cry that the men you can attract suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:28 AM
1

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:01 AM
0

Men try for women they like or are interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:52 PM
0

She didn’t inspire interest in those men. That’s how dating works.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:48 PM
1

So it’s venting when you do it but whining when others do it? Got it. Then the men on here are also venting. Yeah and you seem to have a tendency to date undesirable men from your own words. Clearly that’s all you can get. I don’t believe you’re being picky. I actually think you gave a lot of leeway and still got undesirable men. Says more about you and what you’re able to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:45 PM
-1

She bought personal into the conversation when she mentioned her dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:42 PM
1

I repeated what she touched on in her original post. It’s not an attack it’s her reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:41 PM
2

They didn’t like her personality then. What I’m saying still fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:29 PM
–

She’s just weird. Lol. I don’t even think she’s ever dated anyone. It’s more femcels here than people would like to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:45 PM
–

I get that but your post mentioned the men you dated. Of course they’re still men I never denied that but they’re the men YOU dated. No but you do whine that the men YOU date and can get don’t know how to converse. Still whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:43 PM
–

Yeah a lot of the men YOU can get. This sounds like a skill issue on your part. Remember these are the men you’ve dated. As you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:34 PM
–

The men YOU date. Yes. This is what the men you date did. Proving the point that women like yourself should choose better or be better so that you can get better
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:30 PM
–

The men you date yes. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:23 PM
–

Men see how you look in person and aren’t interested in you. You don’t inspire enough interest for men to give more in depth answers. That’s it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:08 PM
–

When men say this they deny it but that’s also been the case with me as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 03:35 AM
1

They shouldn’t get imprisoned at all. We need both parents for stability
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 12:26 AM
1

But if you can’t get locked up for it as long as you have an excuse why would anyone follow it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:40 PM
1

Forget the nuances it is against the law to not pay child support. You can get locked up for it and it generally is what happens. If you shouldn’t take away a parent because it’s unstable for the kid I agree. Then a man should be able to not pay child support and not be penalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:35 PM
1

So then a man should never face jail time for not paying child support since taking one parent away is unstable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:28 PM
1

Or the child just stays with the parent who dosent need support. It’s very simple. Who ever needs support is dependent. Dependent people aren’t stable. People who are stable and not support should get the children. The children should go to the one who doesn’t need the support because they’re more stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:17 PM
1

The parent who dosent need support is the most stable parent and can maintain the stability for the child. If you need support then you’re not stable you’re dependent. And if you’re unstable and dependent you can’t maintain stability for the child. The parent that maintains stability for the child is the one who dosent need support.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:49 PM
1

But it isn’t now on one persons end (the one needing child support). So the child should go to the most financially stable parent so that the child can keep that stability. That would be the parent who dosent need support just to maintain. The most financially stable parent is the one who dosent need support.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:33 PM
1

If the child is with the parent who needs support then they’re not with the parent who is financially stable. Financially stable people don’t need support. Being given support to maintain the same economic level means you’re not stable. So logically the child should just go to the parent who dosent need support.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:21 PM
1

You didn’t answer my question. If financial stability is important for the child then why dosent the child go to the parent that DOES NOT need support? If you need support you’re not financially stable. Please answer this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:00 PM
1

You literally just said money has nothing to do with stability though. If financial stability is important for the child then why wouldn’t they just go to the parent who DOSENT need support?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:55 PM
1

So why mention stability for the child and disagree after I said child support shouldn’t exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:14 PM
1

But you just said parent worthiness isn’t determined by money.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:59 PM
1

If parent worthiness isn’t determined by money then it goes to my original point that child support shouldn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:56 PM
1

Then by that logic child support shouldn’t exist. You’re arguing against yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:13 PM
0

If the child goes to the one who DOES NOT need support it’s in the kids best interest. If you need support you probably aren’t prepared to have a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:56 PM
0

Even if that’s the case. Again so what? Who wants to pay money every month to a woman who probably dosent need it and probably wont use it on the child? If that’s the case just give him full custody since he Dosent need the child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 02:14 PM
1

Let’s just say it isn’t? So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:39 AM
–

That’s fine if you think that but men don’t see it this way. We’re different in that aspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 08:13 PM
6

It’s bigger than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 08:11 PM
0

Literally everything. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:55 PM
2

*Million Dollar baby intensifies…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:04 PM
–

Or it’s a white guy that quality white women don’t want. An oofy doofy type. Hence the “black wife effect”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 03:02 PM
2

They also curse and say “BrUh” a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:50 PM
–

I doubt any guy in real life is trying to take you out or sleep with you. Femcels kill me man. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 04:11 PM
1

They sure can. And it’s still just your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 05:18 AM
1

A person can have an opinion. I just don’t know why it’s hard to admit that it’s THEIR opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:03 PM
1

And this entire paragraph of yours is YOUR opinion. I’m going to leave if a woman I’m dating gets fat. I need my partner to be physically attractive to me. It’s quite simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:00 PM
1

Again that’s your opinion. I don’t think it’s toxic, shitty or shallow to not want your partner to get fat and leave if they do. My opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:50 PM
1

Your opinion. Every relationship is different. There’s no one way to be in one
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:40 PM
1

You still should leave if you don’t want your partner being fat and they don’t want to lose weight unless you help. Reality of it is it never goes that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:37 PM
1

Just leave. If you take fitness serious and your partner decides to get fat and dosent want to lose weight then leave. They will get in shape for what it is they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 07:29 PM
–

Im glad you someone said it. Victims and victors at the same time. It’s crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 04:29 PM
3

It’s foolishness and it’s not going to end how you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 07:09 AM
-5

Most of these reasonable. Unpopular opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 12:44 AM
1

They quite literally are. Again you’re not owed commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 04:15 PM
0

The Facebook page “are we dating the same guy”. There are men who have taken legal action (libel) against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:24 AM
0

It is bitching. Nobody owes you commitment. The difference is guys didn’t make an entire page about it. To the point where men have to take legal action against it. This sub, red pill and incels are not the general man though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 12:19 AM
2

You clearly do give a fuck because you keep responding in paragraphs. You obviously don’t think before you speak but it’s no surprise. I can tell you are the type that your strongest arguments are “I DoNt GiVe FuCk” and “ i sAid wHaT i sAiD PeRiOd”. You’ve clearly never had to solidify a point in your life and it shows. The OP LITERALLY references dating and dating only and you’re going to still claim it’s not only about dating. Need to be right but ignorant af. No surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 07:30 PM
2

If every woman I came in contact with was shitty person would you say Id be right in saying that’s how women are or would you say I need to vet better? Im sure it would be the second one. So either my logic isn’t stupid or women are shitty people in general because that’s my lived experience and word of mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 05:49 PM
3

So in the context of dating you reference the men in your family? Ok. The subject matter is on men these women are dating not family members. And you know this but instead of admitting I caught you in your own bullshit you just claim you meant the men in your family. The need to be right is insane. So were the women you talked to also referencing the men in their family or men they dated?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 05:41 PM
5

You literally said it requires lived experience and you said you know from your own personal experience. Clearly you do deal with men like that by your own words. So if I tend to find from my own experience and word of mouth that most women are ratchet does that make it true or is there possibly an issue with my vetting? Take some personal responsibility for who you allow in your life. Or learn what words mean and don’t say it’s your “own personal experience”.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:44 PM
0

Well it’s not really a competition but ok. Incels and red pill are niche. You don’t see men “rallying” over not getting laid either. Do you know what a rally is? Of course women wouldn’t rally over not getting laid but they will bitch about the man they want not committing to only them IE: are we dating the same guy. They will bitch about the standard the men they truly want have.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:20 PM
2

That says more about yall. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:10 PM
2

You’re not telling me anything I don’t know. I don’t have to commit to get sex or provide. Sounds like a great deal to me. I have no intention to marry or have kids or provide. It’s not crude it’s my life. “Pussy runs the world” whatever helps you sleep at night. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:05 AM
3

Wasn’t expecting that. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 11:11 PM
2

Sex no longer means full commitment anymore so we don’t care. All I got to do to get wife treatment is a fuck a woman good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 11:10 PM
9

Can I see the stat about the shit stained underwear?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 11:05 PM
2

You’re misunderstanding what I’m saying. I don’t even think you’re asking this in good faith. Men want to be lusted for by the women whom they’re in a relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:35 PM
6

Men know that relationship sex dosent automatically mean she lust for you. If you don’t personally do it fine. If your friends don’t fine. But this happens a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter