TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OneEarth3 Archive

View 1 posts and 97 comments by OneEarth3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Tbh, I'm just looking for a girl who is my direct physical equivalent or slightly worse. The problem is, my direct physical equivalent seems not to exist. I have an average face, thin body, stable job, and I'm mildly socially awkward, with a diverse range of hobbies. There are girls who are "perfect 10s", and then there are the obese girls. For the life of me, I can't find anyone who's slightly socially awkward or just chubby, or who has masculine features or any of the other things you're sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:45 PM
8

The "boring" girl, hands down. I want stability and mutual warmth, and IDGAF if someone is "sexy" in that way. You know what's really sexy? A girl who will still be there in a month. Then again, I'm not a Red Pill, so this question wasn't really for me, was it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 11:25 PM
3

As I've read it, signing away parental rights will remove financial obligations and responsibility, but generally courts will not do it upon request unless child support payments have been made previously and the father has previously "attempted to be present in the child's life". Her heart might be in the right place, but it sounds like she's horribly uninformed and unaware of her own unjustifiable power in this situation, and even less aware of the bias within the legal system. Thankfully, som…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:11 AM
11

Oh yeah, I saw that post. Honestly, I think it's an improvement for TwoX though. That's not nearly the kind of vitriol they would've had in the old days, especially since that's one of the worst recent posts on the sub. I'd say being turned into a default sub backfired on them, hard. They're nearly toothless, and the hardcore feminists have been fleeing in droves lamenting the loss of a safe space.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:05 AM
1

Well, that's kind of addressed when Hibernia says the law should be changed. Of course, there's not a snowflake's chance in hell of that, at least not in the next couple decades...
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:15 AM
2

Their argument is that there wouldn't be any violence to require protection from, if men didn't start the violence in the first place. I've seen them use that argument, and here's why it's flawed. They neatly ignore the fact that most violence is committed by sociopaths and mentally deficient ideologues, who will be around in approximately the same numbers regardless of how heavily they're taught that violence is bad. By demonizing healthy masculinity, they're only demonizing their defense again…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:09 AM
3

It's somewhat nerve-wracking. I can't find a decent answer for how much tension to use, and it may be slowing my progress. Of course, at only a couple months in, I didn't expect much progress...
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:54 PM
4

I started restoring a couple months ago, actually.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:30 PM
1

The same thing pretty much happened to me. There are some online forums, including an (unfortunately not very active) subreddit here, but I don't know of any widespread groups IRL.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:23 PM
12

Can confirm. Otherwise there wouldn't be such a well known and embarrassing history of awkward boners among men. Additionally, most of the rape cases I've read about have involved drugs, or the threat that if a guy doesn't get hard he'll be shot.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:20 PM
2

Now, I'm obviously not saying that a man should have the ability to force the woman to get an abortion. However, the ability to opt out of all connection to the child is pretty much necessary. With legal notice, of course, before the woman's legal opportunity to have an abortion expires.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:09 PM
1

I've been seeing feminists get shut down more and more in comment sections, but then, I've also seen feminists shutting down comments more as a result, and passing laws against "online harassment" which in this case is just simple criticism. They still have control of the media, and if anything they've just gotten more extreme since they started to lose the moderates. They'll lose eventually, but I don't think it'll last long. Dudes are too good at forgiving people for change to be long lasting.…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:08 PM
1

I'd prefer we don't allow refugees of either sex, but I don't see how that has anything to do with men's rights... Most of the people I've seen here just take issue with the idiocy inherent in putting male refugees at the bottom of the list.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:02 PM
53

Yeah, I was just replying to the single point that the feminist in that image brought up. I agree with you about the others as well.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:59 AM
808

I forgot, dudes totally have the ability to abort our unwanted fetuses! ... Wait... No, actually we're stuck with whatever the woman decides. Hmm.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:12 AM
9

Isn't the "pink tax" pretty much women's fault, since they're the ones who showed companies they were willing to pay more for "feminine" scents, colors, and styles in the first place? Absolutely nothing was ever stopping them from "shopping like men" and buying generic panties in plastic bags. The fact that many western women seem to often have higher (translated: unreasonable) standards for that kind of thing is absolutely not the fault of any imaginary "patriarchy."
/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:08 AM
2

If they made negative comments about that one woman, it's totally deserved. If they made comments about all women based on that one woman, then it's not deserved. That's a very important distinction.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 11:08 AM
2

Yeah... They definitely do not believe in "sunlight is the best disinfectant." I'll never understand people who think they still have a valid point even while they need to continuously lie, manipulate statistics, and ban opposition to avoid looking stupid. If they really have the better points, they shouldn't need to silence people who disagree (barring brigading ofc). Feminists should just hold a civil debate, and if the MRA goes pants-on-head retarded, that counts as a feminist win, because th…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:34 AM
4

You're not being downvoted for stating the truth, you're being downvoted for stating "expulsion of the fetal material is also done at HOME when using mifeprex" as if that makes an ounce of difference. Additionally "The medication she's talking about specifically is mifeprex, which is only used in pregnancies under 8 weeks." makes it sound as if you're turning this into a pro-life/pro-choice debate, when the point is actually that killing a fetus/baby has nothing in common with getting an erectio…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:07 AM
0

It's a very popular name... Or it was where I grew up. I bet you could find a disproportionately high number of people named Emily doing just about anything.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:00 PM
4

Unless 8 out of 10 homeless people consider themselves agender fictkin, that indeed sounds like a gendered problem. A gendered problem that affects men many times worse than it affects women.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:58 PM
2

It's already like that on every dating site and most of Facebook. I haven't seen it seep into real life too often, but it's still occasionally said IRL.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:53 PM
3

Additionally, there's no proof other than her word. That's not enough to know what he did regardless of whether he retained his ability to move.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:51 PM
3

I dropped out of a community college three years ago, and can confirm, it was a PC Social Justice hellhole. You couldn't walk into a men's bathroom without seeing posters reminding you not to use the bathrooms to rape girls.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:49 PM
48

How much do you want to bet feminists and/or SJWs claim that white men are falling behind because of our own inherent stupidity and laziness? As I've heard it explained: Of course white men aren't going to college. They're too immature and don't have the mental fortitude to handle it. Now that society has evolved past killing and brute force, men will be given the jobs they're best suited for; mining and construction, unskilled labor. When women and minorities fail, it's because of society. When…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:42 PM
38

Oh, hey, let's read the names together. Jessica Krystal Escarleth (female profile picture) Robert Ayieronna (female profile picture) Carissa Maria Crystal Saul So... We have 2 males and 7 females with insults levied at men who don't want to be hit. Those two men are the token cucks who think they can reaffirm their desirability by deriding other innocent men, and as expected the rest are women. Amazing. And people wonder why there's a shortage of so-called "marriageable men" today. Maybe it's be…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:43 AM
3

It's not beautiful if a pallbearer throws out their back. That's why we have these! http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/30/article-2151962-135C9FE3000005DC-456_468x352.jpg ...Because no matter how much a fat person disappointed their relatives before death, it's nothing compared to the disappointment of knowing your child both died before you and had to be lowered into their supersized grave with industrial machinery. r/imgoingtohellforthis
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:03 AM
5

There is nothing beautiful about fat people. Except for the beautiful expression on their faces when they try to do something acrobatic, realize it's not going to work far too late, and then faceplant like an elephant dropped out of a plane.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 11:53 PM
4

If the father hadn't been so hellbent on cutting off part of his son, he probably would've had several check ups and they might've caught it in a way that didn't result in a nonhealing injury.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:44 PM
24

Also, negates the possibility that it'll spray out at weird angles a while after you're done fapping.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:42 PM
2

I was going to be like "Oh. Good to hear." But then I read the comments, realized most sounded like rabid feminists (and therefore are likely biased) and decided to search a bit longer. This is a comment. I know it's not Sweden, but it's still relevant if it's not a lie. Can you confirm whether it's true? That problem with that conclusion is the fact that countries such as Denmark, Norway and Finland openly and publicy have announced that assault rape have increased due to immigration. For insta…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:39 PM
9

Sweden has recently become known as the rape capital of the world. Mostly because of the recent surge of refugees, who believe it's not rape if it's done to a non-muslim. Of course they still blame the native white men and wouldn't dare stop the refugees.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:17 PM
15

Or pigs, rapists, manchildren, etc...
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:15 PM
5

True. Plus, 'financial privilege' outweighs all the others by a wide margin. You'll never hear feminists or SJWs admit that though, since then they'd be among the top 1% most privileged people in the world.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:51 PM
1

Early death mostly affected infants and very young children anyway in the paleolithic era. It was generally still good to be an adult. It was much better than it was in the late 1800s, by a long shot.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:01 AM
4

I don't think we know enough historical context to really understand daily life throughout most of human history. Just thinking of the inaccuracies in the future that'll persist about this decade makes my skin crawl. For example, if the feminists "win" it'll forever be common knowledge that we were just a bunch of evil misogynists intent on oppressing women. All the schoolkids of the future will smile and nod when they learn about this in school, content in the knowledge that they're far more en…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:31 AM
10

Future generations? It think my generation already believes religion is the source of all the world's problems. I'm an atheist, and I can't count the number of times I've been targeted and insulted by other atheists just for pointing out that land, poverty, demand for resources, and ingrained cultural feuds are at least as responsible for every so-called religious war as the religion itself. Ironically, a subset of those "enlightened atheists" then go on to defend Islam and only attack Christian…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:47 PM
3

She's fat. Of course she's fat. There's still a faint hope that the fetus will die of obesity-related complications, so the kid never has to pay a dime. Also, she looks a bit inbred. I know that's irrelevant, I just want to insult her in every way possible.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:14 PM
9

When there's a wannabe deity looming overhead (in this case the reddit Overlords), waiting for a chance to ban the truth, in that case the truth does need handling.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:06 PM
1

Exactly. Before a child even learns any sophisticated morality, they inherently understand that punishing someone for the actions of someone else is wrong. If Susy hits Billy, but Stacy gets punished for it instead, there are going to be so many cries of "That's not fair!!!" that your ears will start to bleed and fall off. They do seem to love "an eye for an eye" but that's not even close to what this is.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:03 PM
3

I think western society has fucked itself either way with this self-flagellating PC bullshit and the glorification of weakness and victimhood, so I don't have a problem with forcing women to choose between a kid they don't want and military service they don't want. Nothing would change for me, but it'd certainly give me a pleasant glow of vengeful satisfaction to see true equality carried out.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:36 AM
2

I have a feeling the 1 in 6 stat is just as bullshit as the feminist's 1 in 4 stat. Having said that, now that feminists have embraced the fake 1 in 4 stat, it'd look really bad if we used the real "1 in 70" stat or whatever it is for men. They'd just ignore the real "1 in 50" stat for women, keep saying "1 in 4", then we'd look trivial with the "1 in 70" stat. Once one side starts lying, and starts being believed, the other side has no choice but to use the same deeply flawed methodology keep u…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:17 AM
7

He lost custody... As he should've. I only hope the mother would also lose custody if she did something similar, but you know she wouldn't.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:11 AM
6

Say what you like, but someone is much more likely to throw a fit over Sable and Mongolian Wolves being killed than they are over a cow being killed. There are a few who defend both, but the majority of the power behind the movement comes from the people who only care about beautiful and charismatic animals. Very few are campaigning for animal rights under a banner depicting hagfish and warthogs. Source: Am following the Nature Conservancy and Greenpeace Facebook pages.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:37 AM
6

...Maybe he liked the food??
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:05 PM
3

Lolwut, they're blaming Greek's woes on austerity? Seriously?! That's the exact opposite of what caused this mess. My head hurts. It must suck to be a poor or jobless man in that situation though. Ultimately it's still the woman's choice to decide if she wants to have sex for a sandwich, and clearly some consider it a worthwhile exchange. I'd bet men don't even have that option.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:48 PM
1

It has less to do with getting pussy than it does with simply protecting women. The old wealthy men who pass feminist legislation know they're not getting anything extra from it, but they do it anyway to protect and help women at their own expense and the expense of other men. By saying it's all about getting pussy, you're both misrepresenting real people's motives and playing into feminists's hands, as they want to believe that any time a man helps a woman it has a selfish reason.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:42 PM
4

The author's vagina is dark and full of terrors.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:32 PM
9

If you don't have a problem with woman raping men, you're more than welcome to my internet stalker from four years ago. Three hundred pounds, literally a psychopath with a murder and crucifixion fetish, and potential STDs (not confirmed, but highly likely from her symptoms). As a bonus, she's extremely pants-on-head Westboro Baptist Church religious and doesn't believe in birth control or breakups. You're welcome to her. Don't say no or you're gay.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:22 AM
0

Just a question: Who irons? I have literally never met someone with ironed clothing in my life. (I live in rural Wisconsin if that makes a difference). I don't really think that should be included in the list by default, as it's very time-consuming and I don't think most women actually do that.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:54 AM
46

If he wasn't murdered, it wouldn't be for lack of trying.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:10 PM
13

We hate parts of our culture as well. Western culture triggers my gag reflex. It's like a creepy mix of vagina-worship, self-worship, victimization, and greed/consumerism. Of course, I don't think I'd like your culture either. I dislike the majority of cultures that exist right now, but that's a different issue.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:08 PM
-1

If Bruce can confirm medically that he was born with a vagina like that person, then sure, I'll call him a she.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:00 PM
1

Who said anything about evil, FFS? All I said was that religion is not the same as race or sex.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:59 PM
1

Whatever. I'm going to keep calling it a he. Don't care who it offends. Someone's genetics don't change just because they have a series of strategic amputations.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:49 PM
2

People need to stop acting like Muslims are comparable to sex or race. Religions have codified behavior, and are optional. I didn't receive my manbook to read and describe supposed ideal behavior when I was born.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:40 PM
4

I don't give a shit about that so-called "scandal", I just hate that she lies practically every time she opens her mouth...
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:38 AM
2

Just like Clinton then, except at least he's intentionally being a loud-mouthed dolt.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:28 AM
40

That's the point, I'm pretty sure.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:02 PM
13

If a woman can't even be held accountable for hitting another woman, on the grounds that she just needs to toughen up, imagine how absolutely nonexistent the accountability is when a woman hits a man. Cases like this are not only serious issues in their own right, they're also evidence that's extremely difficult to refute that works against feminism, and for men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:59 AM
3

I was actually talking about the Voat page...
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:00 AM
1

You're missing the point. I'm not offended; I am telling you that absolutely nobody who's not already inclined to agree with you will take you seriously if you say things like that in any context. When feminists can find serious things like that to quote, it sets us back, over and over again. And don't pretend it'd go over well in this subreddit if Jezebel ran an article comparing men to dogs.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:03 AM
1

Red pill hates fat people? Damn it... I was hoping I didn't have anything in common with those people.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:48 AM
1

You said that we transcended our biology in modern society because we now think about things besides sex, food, and safety. I pointed out that we still think about all those same things, and that even in the distant past people also thought beyond those things. If you can't see how that's relevant to this discussion, then I don't know how to help you.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:29 AM
1

Humans have always needed sex, food, and safety, and always will. You're making the mistake of assuming those needs were not fulfilled in ancient times, and that we no longer think about them. Additionally, you're assuming relationships in the distant past just amounted to sex, which is not the case. Humans require food, shelter, safety, and sex. We mostly have those now and we mostly had those 10,000 years ago. Humans want good tasting food, hobbies, and relationships. We mostly have those now …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:20 AM
1

Well, now I understand. You just literally have no idea what ancient life was like and you just believe the movies.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:06 AM
6

Yep. Those of us who disdain fatties can keep it on FPH. Bringing it up here won't win many hearts or minds.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:53 AM
1

Our society transcends our most basic animal tendincies Eh, no it doesn't, nor should it. Fighting biology just makes people feel like crap. Try telling a gay person to transcend their gayness and see how that works out for you.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:48 AM
3

"See women are like dogs, hard to tame" ...Aaaand, no reason to read any further. Anyone who sees that is immediately going to think we're insane.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 02:03 PM
2

It really should be. It would've helped so much in my first relationship.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:52 AM
1

If you're having a baby to preserve your national identity, you're going to have the most miserable baby.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:32 PM
2

I forgot, nobody ever gets laid off, nobody ever needs to eat between jobs, and all jobs pay a living wage. Thanks for reminding me that we really live in Narnia.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:05 AM
1

I'm sick as hell of people acting like having a baby is something a woman should be compensated for, or a father, for that matter. In 99% of cases, it is a choice. Additionally, most women choose to care for the child more than men. They have the baby to make their lives better. You can't turn around and claim that's unfair work afterwards that women need to be rewarded or pitied for. That'd be like, a dude starts hunting, and then counts all the hours hunting, planting a food plot, or practicin…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:47 AM
3

In my case in particular, it has been one in two years. And that was not enjoyable for me, as she was pretty much a terrible person. It really grates to hear this "sex is always great for men, it's just how they're programmed!" crap. It's just the equally bad mirror-image of feminism.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:10 PM
1

You said it better than I could, and now I don't have to. Well done. I mean that sincerely.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:07 PM
23

This sounds like someone thinking about their own relationship, getting insecure whenever the guy brings up partially valid rebuttals, and then going online to vent about it on a website that's supposed to be professional. And of course she's fat. I thought Psych Today was better than that. Shame. That's not to say that some of these aren't valid complaints, but they apply to both men and women, and there is definitely a butthurt tone in them.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:49 AM
3

Nah, what'll really happen is the feminists will get the draft abolished. I'm all for this, because I am 100% certain they will find any way to get women out of the draft, even if it means killing the draft.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:51 AM
10

I don't like that it was cut up.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:28 PM
5

No.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:26 PM
7

Well, when a dude starts a talk with his parents about circumcision, and how he hates being circumcised, the first answer is usually "we did it to you because girls like cut penises more." So... Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with you.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:02 PM
1

That's not "to be fair". Half those stats apply only to a ridiculously tiny percentage of people, and the other half are just straight-up faked. For example, the HIV one. The most popular study that's based on was ridiculously biased. They took two groups of men. They cut one group, and then told them not to have sex until their penises healed. They allowed the uncut group to have as much sex as they wanted right from the beginning. Shockingly, the risk of contracting of HIV was higher in the un…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:00 AM
5

Bill Gates (Microsoft co-founder and until recently the largest single shareholder) is one of the world's largest circumcision supporters, and finances pro-circ campaigns in some countries.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:06 AM
5

Well, then I'm glad I use Bing. ...The owner of which convinces people to chop off parts of boys' penises at birth. FUCK.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:57 AM
13

Yeah, I think people are mostly angry about the double-standard.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:06 PM
23

Humanoid? Let's not get ahead of ourselves... She resembles a manatee more. Except she's not gentle.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:42 PM
149

"...[They] lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -Hillary Clinton Psychotic bitch.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:34 PM
5

That's what /s is for. The second part was obvious enough, but the first half sounds real.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:21 AM
5

So... don't be a fucking sugar daddy. Jesus. I thought one of the reasons we're against feminism is because it's not oppression when you just make stupid decisions. This is just a stupid decision from a guy who should've used some common sense. Yes, if you only try to attract people with money, people will only give you fake attention for money. Derp. Impossible for me to have pity on that guy.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:02 AM
3

Eh, it sort of matters. I mean, consider hereditary health defects. A parent with a family history might be prepared for it. A parent with no family history isn't going to be prepared to handle many things, and it's not right to force them to handle the genetic problems of a kid that isn't theirs. Plus, you know, if a dude doesn't want a kid, it's obviously wrong to force them into that with a kid that isn't really his.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:55 AM
-1

Cars cause death and disfigurement, in numbers far greater than all the controversial sex acts in the country combined. Cars are immoral unless you consider death and disfigurement to be morally neutral outcomes. Now, should we ban all cars, or should we accept that people make their own choices and simply try to minimize the risks of those choices?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:43 AM
8

I'm 99% certain there are too many men working for Amazon because they're the only ones willing to put up with the inhumane hours and conditions, while modern American women are not. I'm also 99% certain that feminists are going to spin the high percentage of men, to make it look like Amazon is discriminating against women.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:55 AM
11

The definitions below also completely confirm the top definition.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:49 AM
1

I actually never thought of those possibilities before. DNA samples sound much worse now.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:47 AM
10

Oh, good. It's not just me that thinks r/relationships is like that. I posted there about how a woman... I feel weird saying she emotionally abused me, but she pretty much did. I don't know, really. I posted about it there, and the highest rated answer was that it's wrong to expect women to be kind in relationships, and that it's my responsibility to suck it up and make her happier.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:44 AM
3

I agree with you. This sub seems dangerously close to becoming the mirror image of feminism. Feminists spend all their time complaining about "toxic masculinity", but don't seem to be able to explain what " non-toxic masculinity" would be. Similarly, here people talk about toxic femininity, but they really just seem to mean "femininity," writing off 50% of the population as narcissistic by default. Plus, there's the same confirmation bias. Imo, a good woman would put as much into a relationship …
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 06:58 PM
2

I think of Red Pills as the male version of feminism, like exactly its mirror image. Half of them are bitter and biased, and want to take it out on people who don't deserve it. The other half defends their unjustified behavior, because out of context they can see hints of truth in what they're saying. I haven't really interacted much with MGTOW, but the few I've spoken to seem to hate circumcision, so that left a good first impression.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:18 AM
7

Repost of my earlier post: Actually, I remember seeing a post from a woman who said she worked for the AshleyMadison cheating site. She claimed to be an employee (who knows if that part is true, idk), and was explaining to people why there was such a massive percentage of men on the site. Apparently, her girl friends were pretty much the same as the men on AshleyMadison. The difference, she said, why they would never join a cheating site, is because they didn't consider themselves to be cheating…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter