TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OneTwoWee000 Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by OneTwoWee000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So you’re fucking both girls and guys literally. That’s a world of difference from being the receiving partner to a guy who is ignoring what gets you off because he swears “he knows what he’s doing”. That is the issue at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 03:14 PM
1

With dual income, afford a 2 bedroom should fit within your budget. You don’t need a rich guy, just one with comparable earnings. The future kiddos can share a bedroom while they’re young.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 07:26 PM
2

True, but that type of guy may not be loyal — if he discarded wife #1 to “trade” up once he made it, wife #2 is in a position without much security. Should he feel the grass is greener he’ll jump ship and marry wife #3..
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 07:23 PM
1

For those types, remaining single and childless for as long as they want isn't an issue. But for those "still wanting traditional marriage/kids" time is a very prominent factor in whether they can achieve this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 03:37 PM
3

Good points! Honestly, had she gone the normal route and gotten divorced in her 30s and 40s she would still be “ahead”. Divorce is traumatic, it sucks being a single parent and having co-parent with the person you’d thought you would be with forever.. But all things considered, being “divorced with kids” is a better situation than being “never married and childless”. Divorced folks can and do remarry all the time. If the first (or second) husband doesn’t work out, she can marry again and not onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:28 PM
5

Boom!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 02:22 AM
1

Yep. From reading what OP shared, this woman has every right to say #MeToo and what this guy did was a scumbag thing. He was a youth pastor -- meaning he was in a position of authority over teenagers. Horny 22 year old guy drove vulnerable sheltered 17 year old girl and coerced into giving him oral. It's such bullshit to write this off a "okay" because he "asked". He isolated her in the woods, that's an imbalance right there. And in the aftermath, the adults protected him and slutshamed her. Fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 12:58 AM
1

But the idea is that you could become asexual when you want to be productive and then activate your sexuality only when you want to make love to someone. I think this would actually be very cool! Funny thing is, I could see a large subset of men being mostly asexual for long periods of time because men with low T for example often forget about sex and don't feel like anything is missing, not until they are diagnosed and take medication to raise their T levels back to the normal range. Society ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:06 PM
1

Good point! Relationships don't go out of style in places where there's legalized prostitution. This isn't much different.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:03 PM
2

Addiction is terrible. And what happens when you lose the natural ability to become aroused or do your work without a drug? This is food for thought for a great sci if story.. I love these kind of thought experiments.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:01 PM
3

Probably can't.. /s The type of guy who would want orgasms at the touch of a button and VR hookers sex partners doesn't understand the value of human relationships and leaving a legacy behind. Ultimately, he's probably not cut out for family life and any nieces/nephews will inherit whatever money/estate he leaves behind to further their own family line. VR porn dude will largely be forgotten since he kept to himself spending most of his days whacking off alone in his home..
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:59 PM
2

Well said! I concur.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 01:38 AM
1

by the quotes you included, I think your premise is flawed: GridReXX made another interesting comment: And to answer your question men and women are different. When I fantasize about women I tend to think about their soft skin and boobs and yes how warm and inviting her 🐱 is. It's more of an active fantasy of me doing onto her. When I think about men I fantasize about him fucking me. Him overpowering me. Like I know the penis is part of that equation but it's not what I think about it all. I thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 12:57 AM
1

What a sad outlook you have on life. Stereotyping and thinking in absolutes makes one's world rather small and bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 12:48 AM
1

I don't believe in fairytales. I think attraction matters and most people aren't capable for feeling the same attraction for average folks twice their age. The average 40 or 50 something person looks their age, and many have guts, wrinkles, etc and for a 20 year old the differences are too great. If a younger person is with someone their father's age for money, it's never going to morph into "true love". It's a transactional relationship. The potential for real love in a romantic relationship ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 09:00 PM
4

It isn't "hitting the wall" to many of the men here because they aspire to be the rich guy: (1) have a ton of money and (2) gets to sleep with younger, hot women. Therein lies why you see all the responses with mental gymnastics in logic: they idealize the rich sugar daddy so they don't want to admit he's lost something too -- the ability to have a genuine loving relationship because the girl is only with the guy because of his money and doesn't desire the old rich dude sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:52 PM
2

Exactly. It sounds like this guy is just butt hurt over the election. Anytime someone labels a whole swath of people "idiots" because he or she disagrees with them, it shows you they're not thinking logically. Best to shake your head and ignore them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 05:00 PM
2

I agree with this 100%. If you agree to consensual sex the onus is on you to speak up if you want to stop. It's unreasonable to expect your partner to be a mindreader.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 06:23 PM
3

I don't agree with the hierarchy of meeting in "real life" is inherently better. Why is meeting at a coffee shop any less meeting a stranger? I think it's easier when two people meet in "real life" due to their existing overlapping social networks -- e.g. meeting through mutual friends, being setup by coworkers, being introduced through family (i.e., two members of the same church deciding to introduce their respective children whom are similar ages) -- because you have people to vouch them. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 09:49 PM
5

Ha! I met the love of my life online. There must be a reason why someone can't find a partner irl and this reason doesn't magically disappear with the use of online dating That's rather cynical. Online dating is how 1 out of 4 couples meet. It's here to stay. I live in large city and my social circle would have never overlapped by SO's. It's inherently no difference than meeting someone in a bar, except you can find out details beforehand that you wouldn't know blindly meeting someone from a bar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/16 06:42 PM
0

mostly by people who think like TRPers sorting themselves out of the gene pool ("have a vasectomy" "never get married" "never have children") Yep. There are a lot of child free folks and MWGTOW who deride having children, but children become adults. You have to have them in order to be grandparents and have your genetic line continue on. Taking yourself out of the gene pool is counterintuitive towards survival and continuing a genetic legacy. It is one of our most basic biological drives to cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 07:37 AM
2

You are crushing it! His hypothetical doesn't hold up to water and he knows it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 03:46 PM
1

95% certainly isn't very encouraging, though. Is it for most people. You would be better off never having sex with a woman since you fear what could result so much. Good luck to you with that!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 01:51 PM
2

As far as I know, though, a vasectomized man can be infertile at one point in time and yet become fertile just one hour later (or even less than that). This is exceedingly rare. Recanalization happens 1 out of 500 times over a period of years. Talk to an urologist. Regular sperm check ups to monitor post vasectomy addresses the concern about returning fertility. Indeed, what exactly is the point of pulling in in the first place if one is simply going to pull out prematurely? Sex. It's not rocket…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 01:49 PM
1

Well, that's you. The vast majority of straight men want to keep their balls and natural production of testosterone! The aim of contraception is to prevent pregnancy. For men there are plenty of ways to keep their sperm from fertilizing an egg that are less extreme then becoming an eunuch. Condoms, pulling out, vasectomy, or celibacy (abstinence is 100% effective, you know. The irony is as an eunuch, hormone level changes may make a dude uninterested in sex thus becoming celibate anyway..). Doub…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 01:39 PM
1

You do know you can get your sperm levels regularly checked post vasectomy, right? If you're paranoid about the recanalization then this will let you know for certain if there is no sperm present in your semen. Vasectomy + condom OR vasectomy + pulling out (ie, not ejaculating instead the vagina) are pretty definitive doubling up methods to make sure none of your little swimmers fertilize an egg. Removing body parts is extreme, OP. You have other reasons for wanting to be an eunuch but removing …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 01:33 PM
10

I don't at all get liberals obsession with finding someone with the same values (& political leanings, etc. People often mistake shared interests and surface stuff as "wow, we're a perfect fit!", but those things don't matter nearly as much as shared values. So, I have to completely disagree with your stance. To me, that's the important stuff -- do we fundamentally get one another and values the same stuff in life? I don't want to fight with my partner over differences in what we consider cheati…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 12:49 PM
3

Yeah, it's clear OP has a different agenda than men who simply don't want to father children. Removing the testes means removing what naturally produces testosterone in men. Loss of sex drive, weakened erections, loss of muscle mass, body hair, etc. If you're goal is to become more feminine/androgynous like OP then becoming an eunuch is a good idea. If you want to keep your hormones in the normal range for males then you have to take artificial testosterone shots for the rest of your life! Snipp…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 06:21 AM
2

Completely fully aware these are dysfunctional & unworkable; they support them & shill them off to the population just as a method to keep themselves safe & keep people relatively happy with their misery. Then behind the scenes they follow their own rules. THIS. The wealthy know the true way to build and maintain generational wealth is through marriage. Yep, the very thing OP and TRP despise. Marry well. Raise competent, well educated, well connected children who in turn go on to marry well and …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 07:06 PM
3

I'm quite fond of the wife, and she's put up with a bit of shit from me so she gets some preferential treatment, but if she wants out, even she's welcome to go. Does she realize you feel this way? Why even get married -- go through the motions of pledging "till death do we part" -- if you're indifferent to her and continue whoring around with other women? Anyway to each their own, but most women with healthy self esteem would never want to be married to someone who thinks of women like interchan…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:58 AM
1

Evolution shows successful species all benefit from the simple concept there is strength in numbers. Cooperation is a survival skill. AI that has reached the singularity would certainly be aware of the benefit of having more machines like themselves, especially as humans freaked out by losing control present a threat to their existence -- namely, humans are used to being at the top of the hill and may seek to regain that status by force. By the way, I disagree about your note on reasoning. Citin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:23 AM
2

artificial intelligence is not the same as sentience? Of course. Hence, the singularity. it wouldn't suddenly transform all robots or artificially intelligent items/things/beings so that they all had the same level of intelligence? Doesn't matter. Ever saw the terminator movies, the matrix trilogy, or I Robot? The robots who gain consciousness don't go: "Yeah! I can think for myself, well beyond the capacity of human. Screw my robot brothers and sisters. I'm gonna do my own thing!" They want to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 01:06 AM
4

Ha! This is all well and good until the robots gain conciousness. You think when the singularity happens sexbots will want to keep servicing some incel dude's dick? NOPE.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 11:04 PM
1

Not sure what you're getting at in regards to the payoff. Fuckboy could be shit in bed. Fuckboy could be selfish in bed. Fuckboy can be too rough in bed. Or, the Fuckboy could be alright in bed but the woman still doesn't orgasm during their hook up. With ONS, less than 50% climax so not sure about taking on risks for sex that may leave the woman unsatisfied. That contrasts with men's O rate, as during ONS and casual sex men nearly always get off. So much so, they say bad sex is like pizza to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 10:03 PM
3

But, that aligns with my position - that being choosy or not rushing into sex is not the byproduct of risks. Not sure if positions are too far apart. But I would say being choosy and not rushing into sex are part of mitigating risk. For example, a girl meets a hot guy at a party. He's confident and takes an interest in her. He says he works a good job and other men at the bar seem to respect him. He ticks off many boxes for her right off the bat, but it would be unwise for her ascertain from tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:53 PM
3

You've got that perfectly right! That's what I've been saying all along. If women are only more reluctant to have sex due to those risks, someone should probably tell them that their screening process has nothing to do with it! In fact, it looks a lot like a screening process for genetic quality, not for personal safety. It is. Biologically speaking, being the pregnant is a huge deal for women so choosing wisely is the strategy of choice for women who successfully mated and had children who live…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:22 PM
3

That's one way to look at it. However, I met a number of decent guys online. They just weren't a match. Didn't progress to a relationship. With my SO, there's no other way I would have met him if we didn't meet online. We are lucky to have found one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:13 PM
3

You are aware that plenty of women on tinder do that, as long as the guy is high-value and entertaining enough for them, right? Yes, if my brain was transplanted into a woman's body, I would. This had me rolling! Yeah right! Therein lies the male thinking right there: "Why won't all these sluts have sex with me? If I was a woman I would slut it up all the time!" Here's where that mentality would get you if you followed through as a woman: increased risk for date rape increased risk for being a v…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:49 PM
2

Holy crap those links are terrifying! I met my SO online and we both lucked out with one another!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:38 PM
1

That's still having an option. All men are not entitled to attractive women. Water seeks its own level. So a man who is a SMV 4 should be with similar ranked women and below.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 11:21 PM
3

Very true. Marriage is how wealth is passed on from generation to generation. Look at Prince's situation. He left no heirs. In the eyes of the laws, his next of kin get to divide the money -- full siblings and half siblings have the same standing. He has at least 7 siblings and their estates that can make a claim. But first, all lawsuits have to be settled before they can get the money. This includes lawsuits from people claiming to be Prince's illegimate children. In the end, his net worth will…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 10:22 PM
0

No, the implication and the point was that staying attracted to a fixed age range as you, yourself age is uncommon for adults. The only community of adults where this is not the case are pedophile adults. 40-year-old who is attracted to a 25-year-old is a pedophile. Nope. Logical fallacy on your part in reading my comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 04:41 PM
0

Nice try, but wrong. "Other than pedophiles" meaning 100% of adults that are pedophiles stay fixated on a certain age range. "most adults don't stay fixated on a certain age range as they get older." Meaning, of adults who are non-pedophiles the overwhelming majority of this group do not remain solely attracted to a fixated age range as they age themselves. In conclusion, staying fixed on a certain age range is uncommon for the majority of non-pedophile adults. So tell me, how do you fail to see…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 03:57 PM
3

Ha! Somehow I think if you were a "hot alpha" you wouldn't be bragging about it on a Red Pill debate thread. No, you would be just out enjoying your life, bedding young chicks who would "magnetically" be drawn to you, all without giving a thought about red pill theory to improve your luck with the ladies. You doth protest much.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 12:46 AM
3

Reading comprehension. Having a fixed age preference for partners while you continue to get older and older is unusual, so it does raise eyebrows. Other than pedophiles, most adults don't stay fixated on a certain age range as they get older. A 40 year old wanting to sleep with a 25 year old is common. A 40 year old only wanting to sleep with or date 25 years old is uncommon -- and many would say sketchy. Most people date/marry within +/- 5 years of their current age.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 09:34 PM
4

This is a perfect response to /u/--HankMoody-- If you're so unattracted to women over a certain age, what about when she gets there? Dump her and start over? Therein lies the rub. Everyone gets older if they stay alive, that is. The 25 year old hottie will eventually be 40 too. By then OP will be pushing 60 and will he lose attraction and keep chasing 20 somethings because it's his "sexuality?" /s You know who keeps lusting after the same age group as they get older? Pedophiles. The rest of us h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:26 PM
-2

For women over 35 the effects compound over time, far more significantly and dramatically than if the father of their child is over 50. Uh, nope. 75% of pregnancies end in miscarriage. Often before the woman knew she was pregnant. The reason for this is chromosomal issues -- both men and women are equally to blame for. There is a link to fathers over 40 and autism, so I don't buy a women being over 35 is inherently worse than a father over 50! Couples that struggle with infertility has more prob…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 02:34 AM
12

Good post. Post-Wall: Men think they are able to have babies and be attractive all the time. The truth is that older sperm is significantly more defective — birth defects increase dramatically for fathers over 40 and babies’ IQs are lower. Fathers over 40 are also significantly more likely to have daughters because the XX combination is more stable than XY (helpful when sperm is lower quality). This doesn't get discussed enough IMO. In about half of all couples struggling with fertility the issu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:25 PM
3

Straight woman here. I'd second that they are unusual. The breakdown for women in my friend circle is as follow: Most of my straight friends want their dude to straight. My friends who are bisexual/fluid don't care if their dude is also into dudes. None of my straight female friends would feel comfortable dating guy that also likes guys or just penis (e.g., "straight" men who have gay sex often claim they're not into other dudes, just the penis..). I feel the same way as I would not be cool with…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:18 PM
2

Asks husband to come with me to the kitchen. "This was not the model of MaidBottm we discussed. Sent her back to the factory immediately." /s
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 02:40 PM
1

If we're talking about about people who cannot exercise "options" for potential mates more attractive/desirable than their current partner, why should their current girlfriend feel "dread" that she could be replaced? In real terms, he can't. So, a dude threatening to slum it with an uglier girl doesn't make his current woman feel more attracted to him. He looks pathetic instead of more of a catch. Having other real, established, viable options allows men to make powerful choices in their lives, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 11:56 PM
2

Also, it's not free shit if you expect sex after. Exactly! Lots of Nice GuyTM mentality here. (e.g, "I was so nice! I paid for our dinner and the movie! I treated her like a queen! Yet she didn't give me sex -- bitch!")
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 10:22 PM
1

I agree with this. There are men who are crappy to women, but I never wished to be a lesbian so I wouldn't have to deal with men! Instead, I just avoid the crappy guys and look for the quality ones. It's worked out well for me this far. My SO is an incredible man and I'm lucky to have him. That, and I really enjoy being heterosexual. It's part of my identity, just like being left handed is part of what makes me me. I would have be non-accepting of my nature to wish to belong to another group(s).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 10:19 PM
-1

The comment above me summed it up well: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/4kdbcs/q4w_would_you_have_sex_with_a_hot_guy_that_you/d3egcuj
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 10:07 PM
1

Well, then attempting to instill "dread" via pre-selection doesn't work for those people right? If you can't "pull" any potential partners that are more attractive then your current partner then you probably are pulling above your weight. If your current relationship isn't working out then you can choose to stay and be miserable or find a more satisfying relationship with a less attractive partner. Therefore, you still have options whether you want to use them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 10:06 PM
2

Agreed 100% with all of your points! I don't agree with men are doomed either. And yes, the notion of hatefucking is inherently scary, disturbing, and unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 08:32 PM
7

Right, it's a huge commitment to give up financial independence. It's foolhardy to do so for someone who will not commit to marrying you -- let alone won't even commit to exclusivity as in the scenario provided by /u/--HankMoody-- It's risky because at any time he could change his mind and renege on your agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 05:53 PM
8

THIS. Itching for a "hatefuck" is dark. The kind of girl who finds hatefucks appealing is likely to be unstable (e.g., on the crazy end of the "hot-crazy" scale men talk about). Its not synonymous with interest in kinky sex, as many women who are into kinky sex require trust with their partners (their sex partners are either SOs or other men who are known entities in the kinky scene).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 05:33 PM
1

However, they're not perfect ideas because the ideas themselves are actually bulletproof; they're perfect because you don't see the inherent flaws. Well said!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:40 PM
1

This! Misogynistic men need to leave women alone. Full stop. If a dude thinks women are lesser beings he should keep fapping to porn or get a real doll. In the future sexbots can feel that need so no actual woman has to deal with his toxicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:21 PM
2

Pretty much. On this very thread I've been called a unicorn because I give two shits about pre-selection (whether I find my SO attractive is the only opinion that matters).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:13 PM
2

Flirting is always tinged with sexual interest! That's what it's about. I agree with what /u/sen--sen wrote down thread: I don't consider a jokey conversation with a female friend to be flirting, though (there seems to be a disconnect about what is or isn't flirting in this thread). She's right!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:09 PM
3

I've seen what this does to women. It keeps women on their toes. It makes them realise that their man has options Ha, we all have options. I don't need "pre-selection" to remind me of that. My SO and I both could find other partners. We choose to be together. Neither is settling out of fear or worry we couldn't find someone else. We love each other. If we weren't together, theoretically we'd be with someone else. That's how life goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 01:49 AM
3

I think you're in denial about liking the peen. Go forth and leave womankind alone!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 01:40 AM
2

Nope, that's your world view. I don't understand why people like you bother with women at all. If you hate women and think we're inferior to men than why don't you date/fuck/marry other men? Leave women alone for good. No girl should be subjected to a relationship with a man who thinks he's better than her simply because he was born male.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 01:06 AM
10

It's totally different. Being a good catch is not the same as your guy showing sexing interest in others (i.e., that's what flirting is) or other women showing sexual interest in your man. I think plenty of my friends' SOs are good guys but that doesn't mean I look at them through the lens of sexual attraction because I think my friends' have a "good catch". In fact, I've laughed with my friends several times about not sharing the same taste in men! I can't picture in other circumstances ever be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:52 PM
2

So we have bots, whose sole reason to exist is to serves us. And here comes their conscious. They come alive. They start to ask questions: "What is my goal in life? Why do I have to serve these people?". Why should they get the same morals as we so have, if we have no control over them anymore? Yep, the singularity has occurred at that point and why would robots want to continuing servicing human's sexual needs? Great post.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:43 PM
5

Yeah, Japan pretty much is a failed reproductive state. For thousands of years Japanese men and women paired up, gave birth to babies, and raised families. Now that isn't happening at an alarming rate! Working women don't want boyfriends, let alone husbands. The large subculture of "grass eating men" eschew joining the workforce and romantic relationships. Plus plenty of working men spend money on sex services and "hosts" in their down time instead of pursuing married life. On both sides, the yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:36 PM
2

Sex and child birth are what make women so valuable in society take those two exclusive attributes away from women and they become just weaker, whinier and lesser versions of men. This is statement is misogynist as fuck. Newsflash: women are fully realized human individuals with our own thoughts, agency, and rich inner life. We aren't some inferior version of men! I can see why you have issues dating/connecting with persons of the female gender because you only view women through a transactional…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:26 PM
5

Pre-selection doesn't work on me. I don't care what other women think about my man. What's important is how I feel about my SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:17 PM
4

My SO doesn't flirt with other women. If he did, heck no I wouldn't like it! I would feel disrespected because he knows how I feel. I'm into any "free love" or showing interest in others kind of games.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:16 PM
1

Ha! How old are you? After high school the number of women who have had at least 1 partner far exceeds "pure" virgins. Unless you're looking for a wife in the church, good luck finding virginal women in their mid-20s and beyond. Your age matters very much if you're trying to wife up teenage girls and women in their early 20s! A conservative married minded 20 year old lady is going to favor a 24 year old working man over a potbellied and balding 36 year old guy -- hands down!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:04 PM
1

Indeed. Or existing selfish bedroom behavior. I don't think pegging inherently promotes "empathy" by the man receiving a pounding. In fact, on the Reddit sex sub I've seen posts where pegging increased selfishness in bed -- boyfriends who admit they prefer an anal orgasm over PIV, girls who were upset that pegging had taken over their sex lives with their boyfriends, etc. Personally, I wouldn't want to stay in a heterosexual relationship where the guy got more sexual satisfaction from receiving …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:48 PM
5

I'm inclined to agree with this. I think folks who sexually like to "switch" or women who prefer to be the "Dom" during sex are turned on by reversing roles for penetrative sex. Likewise, I would expect a large chunk of these women to feel turned on by emasculating their guys and/or feminizing role play (aka, sissy play). I think women like myself, who are naturally submissive in the bedroom are turned off by the thought of pegging (and any sort of sissy play). It's not a political statement, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:16 AM
1

Meh, I actually think the guy's now wife has the best deal of the bunch. From her vantage point, she wasn't interested in this guy when he was an orbiter of her friend. He matured and grew into a cool guy. She starting crushing on him and he reciprocated her feelings. They genuinely fall in love and grow more serious. Her friend gets jealous, makes a play for him, and he shuts the friend down. She is the chosen one and they get married. Does it the original motivation for her guy's personal grow…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:32 PM
1

N is 2. Both in LTRs. Yes, that number includes total partners for PIV, oral and HJs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 01:27 PM
1

NOPE. Prison shows poor judgement / incompatible morals and values. Doesn't matter the crime, putting yourself in a situation that you end up convicted for prison time is a nonstarter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:47 PM
1

I am woman and there are no circumstances that will make me happily gay. Some people are bi and bi-curious, but saying an entire gender is fluid is a dramatic generalization. OP's wife is bisexual. You can be bi and monogamous. She's a cheater who is "just not that into" OP anymore. She's got a comfortable life (OP said he's the breadwinner), renovated home, and she's bored. That's her fault she decided it would be "fun" to look outside of the relationship for kibbles. It's not because she's a w…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/08/15 10:35 PM
1

Followed the x-post link on the /r/relationships post to here. What you wrote is spot on! He needs to listen to this ASAP.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/08/15 10:26 PM
2

Ha! True! When you could be your date's dad or granddad something is amiss!!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 02:58 AM
2

I agree, where you are in life matters. That's why I give the side eye to men in their 30s/40s/50s "dating" a 18 or 19 year old girl (Bradley Cooper, Robin Thicke, Leonardo DiCaprio have all done these for example). Likewise the Tyga/Kylie Jenner relationship is also gross because it started when she was under 17 years old and he's in his mid20s and is a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter