TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Oneioda Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Oneioda on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The entire English speaking world was under the circumcision trance at one point in recent history. Not just America, so it's impossible for it to all be Kellogg's fault.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:56 PM
1

This is Africa. These teenagers are not just randomly coming up with the idea and asking mom for permission. They have been bred to anticipate and look forward to this day their entire lives. And if one of them doesn't want to do it, they will be scolded and pushed into it. It is still a massive power disparity. In some of the circ cultures there, if you are a full adult and the village finds out that you are still intact, you will be taken to the middle of town and forcefully mutilated while 10…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:11 PM
2

And yet, France, Germany, etc never circumcised and still don't to this day.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:30 PM
5

Several have tried. Look at Iceland as an example.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:28 PM
3

The same way all genital mutilators are not in jail. There would be tens of thousands at least.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:27 PM
2

You guys really have to stop with the Kellogg guy. I get it, it's a household name, but there were far more influential figures. Sayre, Resmondino, Johnston. The thing is, that time period was the perfect storm for it to become a thing. Medical science was full of quackery and guessing at stuff. Germ theory didn't even exist yet. The Victorian period was very sexphobic and so anything that promised to stop Timmy from playing with himself was seen as good. Same went for Tammy playing with herself…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:23 PM
1

Generally the tighter the cut, the more likely a person is to use an external lubricant. Could be spit, lotion, oil, sex lube, liquid soap, conditioner, shampoo, etc. Edit: a few of those listed are not recommended, especially soap
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:21 PM
2

Not painful. Just takes dedication, daily discipline, and can be mentally taxing. Also, it is growing whatever you have remaining on your shaft. The unique structures and nerves contained in the sections removed do not return, but they still say it is a big improvement.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:43 PM
2

r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:33 PM
2

Marked in Your Flesh: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America https://a.co/d/bvFCuLp
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:24 PM
6

It is part of the American history of circumcision. Look it up if you need to. No offense meant, it's just part of history.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:22 PM
1

Fetish. Fox without a tail. Life long indoctrination. As far as women don't like it: most women that say this have never even seen or touched an intact penis. They couldn't pick an intact erect penis out of a line up. And while they may say they dont like intact penises, their vaginas tell a completely different story. Plus it's a good way to weed out the bad apples, like a red flag, they are doing you a favor. The best therapy America can have on this is more intact penises around so that they …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:05 PM
2

At least they have to go through the bureaucracy hoops , but also women are commonly serving as the front desk at the gym or similar type nothing roles. May as well be a barista at Aroma and call it serving in the military.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 09:00 PM
2

It's cultural, not medical. Infant age for a social circumcision is rare in a global and historical context.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:50 PM
2

Lol. You can guess based on where they are from. Not at all required though. My dermatologist was very helpful and knowledgeable about mucosa issues and yet he was circumcised.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:31 AM
9

Rewind the clock 10 years to when the word incel wasnt in your vocabulary and try again. I think the word you just described there starts with an M.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:57 AM
6

Yes and no. It sounds like you just had a doctor not too experienced on this issue. Go see a male dermatologist, maybe one who likely has an intact foreskin himself, or a urologist, but I suggest the dermatologist based on my experiences of both on skin level penis issues.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:46 AM
3

Seeing as an adult can circumcise themselves at any time for perceived benefits such as STD avoidance, but an already circumcised adult cannot uncircumcise themselves for percieved benefits such as overall sexual health and spirit, I cannot see how that is a fair position to force someone into. One person is free with options and self-determination, the other person is stuck where they are.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:18 AM
1

That's fine to disagree with that statement, violence is a strong word in many senses. It is still violating a persons right to bodily integrity though. And generally it is argued that parental rights do not supercede that.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:02 AM
6

Which brings up the issue of using circumcision as a treatment, much less used as a preventative. Instead we would like to see better methods developed and utilized to help boys and men retain all of their body parts. Education and discovery of better care of these body parts could help also. Ideally, we should be working towards a goal that circumcision is never a medical necessity, but is still obviously available for adults who choose it. Same as labiaplasty and hoodectomy is viewed today.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:01 AM
6

Not much lower; marginal reduction at best, marginal increase at worst. The STD rates between circumcising cultures and non-circumcising cultures of similar economies don't show this benefit in reality. Way too many men would have preferred to remain intact for this to be a rational thing to force upon a person. Given that most intact adult men are unlikely to want to remove this part of their penis, it fails that level of medical ethics too. It is violence against children, just not with evil i…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:37 AM

I see a lot more people nowadays. I hate what they did to my dick. All circs are different and for me they did a tight cut and removed the frenulum. Not cool and quite common in hospital clamp style circs. It's not even considered poorly done, just the "style" this particular doctor was taught.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 10:33 AM
1

Looking possibly like media spin and propaganda. This is as much of her quote as I can find this far. "The conclusions to be drawn from this must still be carefully examined," she told the newspaper. "Formally, male circumcision without consent or, in the case of children, is to be regarded as an impairment of physical integrity." And at some point of course she would have said male circumcision is not comparable to fgm. The reporter can then say, well if fgm is illegal, and we make circ illegal…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 10:38 AM
1

Thats a pretty horrible reason. I would like to find an actual quote from her or any organization saying that is the actual reason. That a person would say "in no way comparable" doesn't surprise me. Either way though, seems like she condemned boys genital autonomy being protected. Pathetic. Katrin Altpeter Nurse, teacher, politician Dates as early as 1989 Eventually Minister for Labor and Social Order, Family, Women and Elderly (2011-2016), which is when this all happened (2012)
/r/MensRights16/07/23 10:13 AM
2

I'm aware of the various religious factions doing this, and some other groups. But I haven't seen any feminist groups or leaders taking an active roll in thwarting child male circumcision ban legislation or proposals. I would like to learn more about this if you have any resources to share. Circumcision is not a Christian practice. Any Christians that do practice it are doing so as a social culture, even if they use bible references along with every other possible rationalization under the sun.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:11 PM
1

Can you show me one of these? I'm not aware of them.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 07:36 PM
2

And by "solution to whatever" should be understood to mean pretty much everything: paralysis, epilepsy, scoliosis, syphilis, insanity, blindness, diarrhea, tuberculosis, spermatorrhea, masterbation (which itself caused all sorts of physical and social ills), etc. So very much like current day, they list a litany of things it supposedly solves, they have just changed their list over the years. You'd think if any one of the things were substantial and meritable, that alone would warrant it, but no…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:23 PM
4

Anti sex and anti masterbation of the victorian puritans, yes. Feminism, no, they just left boys and intersex in the dust when they set out to protect girls from forced genital cutting. Unsurprising and standard "equality" improvements we've come to expect from that camp.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:11 PM
10

From the Abrahamic religion sector, there are Jewish scholars over the centuries that have talked about its effect on sex. Maimonides is notable. And one of his students whose name I dont recall atm. Eric Cloppers presentation probably covers it somewhere "Sex and Circumcision: an American Love Story." (Pretty intense delivery imo, but I don't recall noting anything glaringly inaccurate. From the medical Anglosphere and Victorian Puritan side, yes there is lots of documentation about anti master…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:06 PM
2

Gotta love how indoctrinated we are that penile damage is listed as only a possible outcome when performing a surgery that by its very nature removes part of the penis. Perhaps it should read as "unintended penile damage."
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:06 PM
4

^ This. Screw the framing of benefits vs risks (i.e. conplications adverse events) and look at the guaranteed bodily harm.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:01 PM
3

You drank the propaganda without even realizing it was propaganda. (which is the most effective way)
/r/Male_Studies14/07/23 09:05 PM
3

Mucocutaneous junctions in the body have a microbiome, which is a balance of various types of the micro-organisms bacteria and fungi, also referred to as flora. These are needed for optimal health of these body parts, which includes the eye, mouth, vulva/vagina, and penis.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:50 PM
4

Toddlers do not need to clean inside their foreskin because there is no inside part in young children. It is fused to the glans, like how fingernails are fused to the nailbed. Attempting to retract can cause a sight for infection and damage the penis. Yeast infections at not inevitable and easily treated if they occur. Just like for girls.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:39 PM
3

You have no idea how a foreskin works. Lmao
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:31 PM
2

Not sure why people down voted this. Those two points are true and not commonly discussed.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:26 PM
3

And there is zero discussion about the human nature experience of having a penis with foreskin as we were designed. It's a human rights violation regardless of health benefits or not.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:07 PM
1

Not the MAJORITY of research. Just the set of African trails back in 2007-ish. Everyone is just referencing those. Other studies of data do not show that sort of change.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:01 PM
1

That makes the claim northeastern africa and middle east greater than 2000 years ago. Other cultures nearby regions at the same time periods did not circumcise children. No evidence that they had disease build up. Maybe there is another reason and result going on that people refuse to look at.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 10:11 PM
2

What time and place? There is no evidence and documentation that circumcision was ever a health and hygiene thing until modern times.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 08:51 PM
0

The first amendment is based on a principle. Sure it is not illegal, but violates the principle.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:12 AM
3

If you want obvious clear irrefutable biological facts. Educational resources on the development and anatomy of the prepuce. Functions of the Foreskin (Prepuce) https://youtu.be/D_dzeDvx2QA mirror https://youtu.be/luDqvvGbhzU?t=9 Anatomy of the Penis: Penile and Foreskin Neurology https://youtu.be/DD2yW7AaZFw Sex As Nature Intended It http://sexasnatureintendedit.com Gallery of Intact vs Damaged http://www.circumcisionharm.org/gallery.htm Anatomy and Histology of the Penile and Clitoral Prepuce …
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:17 PM
11

Retracting a boy's foreskin is akin to inserting into a girl's vagina. Bathing consists of running water on the OUTSIDE of genitals. Bathing is removing foreign substances from a body. Raping is taking away a person's property or despoiling them. One definition of rape: an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter