TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Only2DaysLeft Archive

View 0 posts and 553 comments by Only2DaysLeft on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Does there even need to be a reason? Do we not maintain the freedom of association?
/r/MensRights21/09/19 04:16 PM
12

Does there need to be a reason to participate in a male only space?
/r/MensRights21/09/19 03:48 PM
1

You can't guarantee anything other than your idiotic responses. lol!
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:59 PM
3

will they decrease the amount of mass shootings? guaranteed. lolol!! You think you can guarantee such a thing?? 😂🤣😂🤣
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:44 PM
1

But you are so mighty, and, and, oakish!! Your leaves change color in brilliant display! We will surround you with mulch and water your roots as you prepare for cold times.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:10 PM
1

Your interpretation is wrong but it's ok.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:55 PM
1

Do you cry, oh Mighty Oak?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:18 PM
1

What a wonderful world it would be, can you imagine? A world where people weren't offended by every little thing. Where they don't milk the system for special treatment because feelings. A world where false accusations don't exist. Where the assumption of innocence actually does exist. A world where the mere word of a woman is not taken as truth without evidence. One where a mere accusation doesn't cause harm for the rest of your life. Where everybody is supported equally through difficult times…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:06 PM
1

as a rape victim every interaction with people you think, are you going to do it to me? And not knowing your rapist, every interaction, did you do it? By this logic every traumatic experience creates a lifelong victim. Is that the point? To make everything hurt forever? For what purpose? To gain sympathy and special treatment for the rest of your life? We all go through some seriously debilitating experiences. At some point we must overcome them, not be consumed by them. For example, death of a …
/r/MensRights15/09/19 09:14 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:02 PM
1

Does the state own your person?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:57 AM
1

What is the basis for categorizing suicide as criminal?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:27 PM
1

Geez man, mellow out and stuff. Like, why are you so hostile?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:20 PM
1

Defend your life in a mellow way. Umm
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:15 PM
3

You post is like the 5th or 6th here.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 10:29 PM
1

What is the basis for, "If the funniest people are often the most sad'?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 11:13 PM
2

pat pat pat
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:27 PM
2

I believe it when you say you need therapy. You REALLY need it.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:12 PM
1

Normal. Heh. So could you educate me? I can but it won't help. You are lost in your anger. In order to learn something new you must be ready, willing and able to accept information that is contrary to your current belief. For example, you keep labelling me sexist despite having made no sexist remarks. Now, I can educate you that I'm not sexist but will you accept it and change your ways? Maybe should learn to stick up for your fellow man. Another example of a baseless assumption you casually spe…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:58 PM
1

The victim complex is strong in you. I feel your hate growing. One day it will consume you entirely.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:35 PM
1

Daddy issues - check. Anger issues - check. Self-righteous / overinflated ego - check, check. It’s not fair I can clear as day see it in my boyfriends eyes that he needs we been dating for almost 3 months now In less than three months of almost no time spent together you assuredly claim he needs therapy. Yet... He and I had been friends for so many years I didn’t think he would do that to me. After knowing this guy for years you were unable to detect his ability to deceive you. Umm. Something is…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:18 PM
2

On one hand it's nice that you think we're all honest here. On the other, it's sad that you clearly want to bypass the purpose of this sub for your personal agenda. This tells me that you feel privileged enough to not be bothered by basic courtsey much less adherence to local policy. If you willingly choose to break protocol here, what else are you capable of? If you are ok with using a forum not suited for your question in an attempt to discover a supposedly hidden stereotypical behavior of men…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:49 PM
1

Your suggestion has a nice feel but it is founded on a flawed premise. Ideas do not create truth. What somebody thinks about a group is not inherently true. You are asserting that the MRA is unsympathetic to female survivors of sexual assault using the banner of feminism to hide behind. You are aligning yourself with their wrong ideas then come here with passive aggressive accusation and suggest the MRA should change to be more gynocentric. What you suggest is to react to accusation by doing the…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:43 PM
1

Alright, which one of you forgot to lock the asylum last night? Hmm?
/r/MensRights08/09/19 10:54 AM
3

lol Weak.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 08:44 PM
3

In other words, no, you don't know the author therefore you are making an assumption. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 08:39 PM
8

You mean you know the author of the text in the image?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:12 PM
5

pls don't use that word
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:25 AM
2

The problem is that you've already formed a conclusion, now you want to look for evidence. That's called confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:23 PM
2

You can believe whatever you want - does not mean it's true.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 09:32 PM
2

I don't blame him for leaving. Race baiting is deplorable.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 09:05 PM
3

No. I've read the entire exchange. You are trying to race bait and he isn't biting.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:36 PM
3

Instead of taking his words at face value you convert them into something else. It's called 'race baiting'. It's a form of bullying against anybody that says something about a black person. You want to paint the MRA as racist but it's not working. Troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:00 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:37 PM
0

It matters not to me whether the post is removed or not. You are still in the wrong.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:34 PM
-1

If you break a rule, regardless if it is enforced or not, you have still broken a rule. Speed limits are set for most roads. If you exceed the speed limit you can be fined. No matter if you are stopped for speeding or not, you are still in violation of the speed limit.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:32 PM
0

The wrongfulness of an action is not nullified because others do it.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:26 PM
0

Heh. You're trying to defend your wrong doing by pointing out the wrong doing of others. Nothing you say will change the reality that your post is in violation of the rules.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:22 PM
0

I agree. That doesn't change the inappropriateness of your post.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 10:02 PM
-1

Rule #1: Must be related to men's rights. (from the sidebar) As you have so kindly pointed out: Dude I'm not saying this violates mens rights Your post is in violation of Rule #1.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:59 PM
-1

And I asked you what right of men does a movie violate and if your solution is to prohibit making movies you disapprove of. You won't answer either of those. Instead you want to rage against a movie you don't like on a sub for men's rights. Uh huh. Rage on trollie.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:52 PM
0

Again you did not answer.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:46 PM
0

You don't like the content. I understand that. Do you want to stop people from making movies you disapprove of? That's called censorship. Is that your solution?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:44 PM
1

No no. I didn't ask what was happening in the movie. What right of men is being violated by making a movie, any movie?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:36 PM
-13

What right of men is being violated by this theatrical production?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:32 PM
-16

It was a genuine question but you didn't answer.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:24 PM
-15

Do you stand against every movie that glorifies a negative behavior or just this particular one?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:19 PM
1

This I completely agree with. Now to make the connection between this and the image in the OP.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:06 PM
1

Try voicing your thoughts differently?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:43 PM
1

I'm not completely on board with your assessment. The image clearly states that weak men are abusive instead of protective. The inverse is that strong men don't abuse women. They protect them. You even use the idea of "real men". All of this is a means of imposing expectation.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:26 PM
2

Do you believe it is a man's duty to protect women?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:59 PM
58

Which man was responsible for the fabled virgin birth?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:55 PM
1

I've only heard of the tuber through discussion here. Those recommendations we're typically from feminists and the like. After the discussion in this thread I'm not interested in watching the videos.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:56 PM
1

I already dismissed your point with reason. Some things you said gave me the impression you've not gone through this before so I asked. Not having children isn't a bad thing but it does mean you are missing the experiences that come with the territory.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:36 PM
1

That makes sense.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:25 PM
2

Your fire and brimstone approach is funny as hell!! And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger Those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord When I lay my vengeance upon thee!
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:09 PM
3

Good point, although it is a framework for government, it is not the actual government.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:04 PM
3

I appreciate your honesty.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:00 PM
2

Convinced of what?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:41 PM
2

1) I stand firm on two genders. What evidence was presented to create more than two? 2) All systems of government have flaws. What are the flaws of socialism?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:40 PM
4

What issues did you change your mind on?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:21 PM
8

Case for what?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:50 PM
1

I appreciate the effort. I'm going to reserve my decision for now as I'm not as convinced.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 07:38 PM
-1

I see. Do you feel better now?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 07:23 PM
2

Ah yes, the oblivious semanticist. Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/08/19 07:08 PM
12

What's the word for somebody who reads too much into things then tries to add meaningless complexity to a simple concept?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 06:53 PM
1

I decided to weaponize my autism What does this mean? Are you attacking something? and resolve this. Resolve what?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 06:44 PM
3

By chance would you be a member of the men's lib sub?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:59 AM
1

Do you have children?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:36 AM
1

Apples and Elephants. Illness is not the same thing as clothing. Illness is a special circumstance. Clothing is an ordinary, everyday requirement.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:41 AM
3

What makes it unfair? And yes, I woukd sacrifice a part of my earnings, it's called tax and healthcare. That's great! I need $6,538 a month for cancer treatment. PM me so I can give you my address to send the money. I'm saying the parents should pay for both of their necessities I agree. Up to a certain age their needs should be met. Once that age is reached, personal responsibility must begin. We teach our children how to become self-reliant through practice. Money management for example. We gi…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:44 PM
1

I agree. Up to a certain age all of the needs of our children should be met. In this particular case the father is preparing the children for independence. Gradually we shift more and more responsibility to the child with the goal being that one day they will no longer require parental care.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:22 PM
6

There are no unfair expenses. What a person needs to survive does not create an imbalance against others. For example, if a child needs orthodontics, the expense of that is not unfair when compared to another child. It is simply a fact of life. Other children should not be given less because one child needs more. Later in life some people develop very expensive health problems. Are those expenses unfair? It I require cancer treatment and you do not, is that unfair? If so, does that mean you shou…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:32 PM
8

Bras are not an extra item. If they are necessary, they are a needed item. The father laid out the plan to distinguish between needs and wants. If the child needs a particular item then they must choose how to fulfill that need within a budget. This is a true-to-life learning exercise. Later, when she becomes an independent woman supporting herself financially, nobody is going to come along and buy her bras. At some point she must learn how to disburse her money to successfully cover her needs. …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:10 PM
1

but it doesn't teach teamwork or hard life lessons about where the money comes from and who's the one having to work to support the other. What do you mean?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:43 PM
4

Ad hominem does not make your argument stronger. Yes, parents should clothe their children. They should not favor one over the other. If one child needs $500 for clothing, $500 should also be spent on the other. Children should not be treated differently.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:55 PM
2

Sad but true. The uniform idea has ups and downs. I am undecided on if it is more beneficial than not.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:47 PM
4

No. She does not have "extra" expenses. She has expenses just like he does. If she is subsidized for any reason and he is not, you have created a discriminatory situation. Do you agree?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:45 PM
7

I was hoping they would recognize that. Any sports gear would qualify.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:31 PM
3

If you subsidize one child and not the other you have created a discriminatory situation. Are you advocating for financial discrimination among our children?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:30 PM
8

Indeed. The buzz word they use to extort more money for school clothes is "social currency". Children should not be taught to value how they look while at a school. School is to obtain an education for the purpose of developing skills that can be used for employment.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:28 PM
4

Healthy children are taught to budget accordingly.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:25 PM
5

If OP subsidizes bras for daughter, what should he subsidize the son for?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:59 PM
34

I read through the comments and found the opposite. OP is taking a LOT of flack for not recognizing the expenses of bras. I think OP is NTA for giving his kids the same amount. Budgeting your money is essential in life. If you need an expensive item then you trade off for something you don't need. If bras are that critical for comfort then buy them instead of fashion accessories like earrings, necklaces, etc. OP setup a very good learning exercise. The women complaining about it don't want to sa…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:58 PM
1

It is good to go to the source. I'm curious why your gender is important in this endeavor? Problems faced by men do not change if you are a woman. Perhaps you believe that men will be more open with a woman?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:50 PM
0

Based solely on your capital letters? No. Does it matter if you are a girl?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:40 PM
1

Capital letters do not imply truthfulness.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:37 PM
2

Why did you shout at the end of your post?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:34 PM
2

Where is Buck Rogers when you need him???
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:30 PM
2

My hunch is that they have invested in P&G and the turn of events is hurting their portfolio.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:17 PM
2

I have a hunch that headingtoshore has investments in P&G and this turn of events is hurting their portfolio. Nobody shills for a corporation quite like an investor does.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:16 PM
3

Ah yes, found the investor in P&G. Nobody shills for a corporation quite like the investors.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:10 PM
1

lol!!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:01 AM
-1

How is this brigading?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 09:59 PM
10

Why create gendered categories of characteristics if everybody displays them?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 09:45 PM
6

What is masculinity?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:00 PM
2

I think as a society we're making slow but steady progress ridding 'toxic masculinity' What is toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:35 PM
1

It's like you aren't even reading my post, you're just trying to sweep it out of your mind. Ad hominems do not make your arguments stronger. No, a person likely won't say "yeah I feel manly when I beat my woman into submission" but are you saying that this doesn't happen? It does. If it does happen then you have a source. Otherwise you are making assumptions. Yeah sure, go ahead and have a friendly, sportsman-like competition and that's great. Why even mention the legality of street fights? Beca…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:14 PM
1

People do bad things in the name of masculinity all the time. People hurt their wives physically or emotionally because they're the man and they have to be in control. I'm curious about the language you use here. You use 'people' being hurtful to 'wives' because they are 'men'. This is very odd phrasing. Do you have a source for this? In my years, I've never known a man to say, "I beat my wife to prove my manhood." Control issues exist in relationships and are seen from both men and women. This …
/r/MensRights20/08/19 05:07 PM
2

That makes sense. Do you believe toxic masculinity is a thing?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:07 PM
1

At the beginning of this thread you posted: Daily reminder that "toxic masculinity" does not mean "all masculinity is toxic." This says that you identify two forms of masculinity - a toxic and a nontoxic form. Just now you posted: I would like to close it by discarding gender roles and stereotypes entirely. Does that indicate you no longer believe that viewing behavior through the lens of gender is a good idea?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:34 PM
1

Biologically there are two genders. We understand there is a distinction between male and female. The words masculine and feminine are adjectives that describe something in relation to their respective definitions. Behavior is the set of actions performed by a person with no distinction made between gender, age, race or any other personal characteristic. The only distinction we make is between good behavior and bad behavior. The reason for that is based on the idea of equality under the law. Ope…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:40 AM
1

Implicit bias is not the same as intentional bias. Bad behavior happens in every demographic. Creating phrases to single out certain groups is wrong.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 10:28 AM
1

No. You are applying gender to the subject of bad behavior. Why do you want to make the subject gendered?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:27 AM
1

Why do you play identity politics with the concept of bad behavior? Anything you describe one gender doing, the other can also do. Playing the victim? Check! Exploiting their gender for gain? Check! Why the need to genderize bad behavior?
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:37 PM
2

I do not necessarily care what a dictionary says about words and their definitions. Because, in the end, the people will decide what a word means and words change all the time. Yes, very correct. And they will change the definition at will to fit the narrative being pushed. For me, I feel there is room for men's rights within the definition of "feminism" Wait, you just said you don't care about words and their definitions. Now you are directly referencing a definition of a word? I think one of t…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:12 PM
1

We can agree to disagree. You are very skilled at searching for positivity where none exists. You are also very skilled at seeing negativity where none exists.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:45 PM
1

I searched the internet for "what is prayer", and this is what I found: Is that all you found? Do I really need to fill the screen with hundreds of links that describe prayer as a request line? I am not biased against religion. Organized religion is a man made system to control large populations with minimal effort. Religion gives hope to the hopeless . In return, the followers surrender their free will to the church. It is an exploitative relationship that should be abandoned.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:28 PM
1

Prayer, for instance, isn't the belief that some deity is going to make your dream come true. This is not true at all. Search the internet for "What is prayer?" most religions do not encourage you to become dependent on anything. This is also not true at all. Search for "Depend on God" it was their ability to make that leap of faith without knowing how it was going to shake out that enabled their success. It was their confidence to act, based on dependency on God to give them [insert adjective].…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:25 AM
1

You are proud of your hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:47 AM
1

dorothy_zbornak_esq: I’m happy to have a civil discussion Poster: If you are really an attorney, go back to school, dorothy_zbornak_esq: please tell me what’s civil about who I was responding to? Frankly my response to duderino up there was more than patient considering how childish he’s being. [You started off very early being supremely offended by somebody telling you to go back to school] Poster: Patriarchy is always a fun cop out answer, no other argument blame the patriarchy. dorothy_zborna…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:29 AM
2

I didn't accuse you of anything. I pointed out your hypocrisy. Now you're deflecting. smh
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:34 AM
2

You cried about somebody telling you to go back to school. Now you're disparaging somebody who disagrees with your claims of patriarchy. Heh.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:24 AM
3

What happened to the whole civil tone policy you were complaining about earlier?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:15 AM
2

If the religion requires genital mutilation, is it still beneficial? As to prayer, I really like the comparison to meditation. That part is good. But the companion to prayer is the belief that if your wish is granted, God made it happen. This leads to many many problem not the least of which is the inability to recognize your contributions to your situation in life. If God likes you, God 'blesses' your life with success and happiness. If not, God curses you with pain and suffering. This magical …
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:06 AM
2

You can take my advice or trash it. Getting upset with me is not going to change your experience here.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:57 PM
5

Will you read this and give me your thoughts on it? https://www-m.cnn.com/2012/03/09/opinion/hitner-alimony-overhaul-pro/index.html A visit here will be useful for this discussion as well. https://www.massalimonyreform.org Here's another good read: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gop-tax-overhaul-how-it-would-alter-alimony/ [2017] The Census Bureau says 243,000 people got alimony last year, 98 percent of them women. The Internal Revenue Service says 361,000 taxpayers claimed they paid a total of $9…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:55 PM
4

Relax your judgement. Understand that men are angry about real injustices they face. Listen to the message they are saying. If they only attack you for the sake of attack, cut off communication. If they angrily voice serious concerns, listen and respond how you will. Civil discussion can be very heated yet remain productive. Are you up to the challenge?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:39 PM
9

If a women chooses to stay at home instead of pursuing a career, why is the man held responsible for that when they separate? If the decision was unilateral then she should receive alimony long enough to resestablish herself. But lifetime alimony? She marries, waits a few years, divorces, and gets paid nicely for the rest of her life? Is that fair?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:37 PM
8

You will experience a lot of strong resistance here to your assertions unless you can verify them. Declaring divorce court is mischaracterized isn't enough. Many members here have gone through the ringer a la divorce proceedings. Many study countless cases of unfair rulings against men. Some will offer you links to page after page on the subject. If you come to the Men's Rights forum and immediately dismiss the things they are telling you, your civil discussion will fall on deaf ears as just ano…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:33 PM
5

Do you believe that men are being treated fairly in family court?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:19 PM
1

Nobody taught us to be dominant. We tend to suppress our emotions because they are a handicap when we have to deal with stressful situations. I agree and disagree with this. In high pressure situations or even just fast-paced environments, emotions get in the way. Think emergency room. There is NO room for emotional delay. Decisions are required immediately. Taking time to examine how you feel about the situation could cause tragedy. You could argue those environments are not prevelant but I wou…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:00 PM
1

If the only thing you can think of is "either it's perfect or it's not worth doing" then we'll never get anywhere. I never said anything of the sort. This is ad hominem. I asked what a perfect expression would look like. You can't describe it. You want improvement in the expression of emotion but you cannot express what that actually looks like. If you can't do yourself what you expect out of others, your cause is lost.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:48 AM
3

It doesn't have to be "perfect", I don't think anyone is saying "Men should be able to perfectly express their emotions", that's another unnecessary standard we can't live up to. But you still don't accept things the way they are?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:37 AM
2

I don't disagree. I'm asking what will you do differently to improve your chances of success?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:05 PM
2

Yes. And if they censor your message, why post it there?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:46 PM
-3

I'm asking you.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:38 PM
2

Why would you voice an opinion on a platform you believe is going to censor you? Isn't that like expecting milk from a bull?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:34 PM
5

So you're upset about people being upset and you're whining about their whining. Uh huh. lol Oops, did I just trigger another episode?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:31 PM
2

If your entire plan to bring positive change to the world hinges on your ability to manipulate the MSM to comply with your demands, you've already lost.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:28 PM
2

I am a victim... of your awful clappy hands.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:23 PM
10

No. The BSA opened their doors willingly as a way to bolster dwindling participation. The GSA never wanted it to happen.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:57 PM
-4

Why not?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:44 PM
5

What does the perfect expression of male emotion look like?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:27 PM
3

In your assertion you speak for the entire male population?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:35 PM
1

After reading the article I'm not convinced that we've reached epidemic proportions meriting the fever pitch of anti-white male sentiments. From your source, Three groups give statistics: according to an FBI report released last November. More than half of the hate crimes reported in 2017 were motivated by racial or ethnic bias, while anti-Semitic hate crimes jumped by 37 percent. This does not indicate who is to blame. Racial crime is not unique to white men. The other two contributions come fr…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 10:32 AM
4

Somebody woke up on the wrong side of the bed!
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:52 PM
25

You know, I believe you have stumbled on a new public service - finding / cataloging these kinds of posts into a searchable database for use as evidence of false reporting. Hmm..
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:05 PM
1

You said: If you can show me where I was , as you claim, defending the study I quoted you saying There is no better set available than the crowdsourced one used by the op study. You lost. Again. Geez man, how much of this can you take?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:23 PM
1

These are your words: There is no better set available than the crowdsourced one used by the op study. Now what?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:06 PM
1

Now with the ad homs eh? You don't like to lose gracefully do you?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:36 PM
1

You lost. Good game. We can play again another time.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:26 PM
1

I'm not attempting to redeem myself, Yes. Yes you are. Your argument has gone from defending an inaccurate claim based on shoddy data collection to one of epistemology. The problem with that is you contradict your own argument when you continually assume to know that I don't know something. How do you know that 'I don't know'? For example, you reached for a 'gotcha' moment when you assumed to know that I had not actually looked into the subject. You called it a flat denial without evidence. A co…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:45 PM
1

Looks like you missed the initial conversation I had with OP. If you had read the conversation, you would see where I point out that I put in my due diligence to debunk the 6th leading cause claim. It only took 15 minutes. I was sincerely curious. I've researched this topic before when these claims have been made here in the past. I looked again to see if anything significant had changed. Nope. Not the 6th leading cause. Your current attempt to redeem yourself is based on an assumption that I pr…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:59 PM
2

Do you support feminism?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:56 PM
2

Where does the author of the article you reference make it known she is a feminist?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:40 PM
1

Now then, where were we? Ah yes, you were cleverly trying to defend the position presented by Edwards in the video via devil's advocate. And when confronted by the glaring problems in the studies and Edwards own admission of data collection and compilation errors resulting in best guess estimates, you then retreat and pretend you personally weren't making or supporting these statements. Yeah, no. Not going to work. You bet on a lame horse and you lost. It happens.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:08 AM
1

Can we play rough and tumble later? I'm driving an M103 through the seigfried line.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:57 AM
1

What a graceful way of saying you were wrong. I accept.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:36 AM
1

The following is a transcript from the video. I have highlighted the parts that are of import: FRANK EDWARDS: Yeah. So, NVSS, the National Vital Statistics, those are based on medical examiners reports, and they record about 50 percent of all cases of police involved death that occur in the country.There’s been a few other studies by other authors that have looked at the coverage of cases from National Vital Statistics relative to the coverage of cases in systems like Fatal Encounters, and have …
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:20 AM
2

There is no official data on death by police. Everything is a speculation.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:20 AM
4

I know. And I quoted Edwards saying as much.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:09 AM
2

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282929.php
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:06 AM
2

https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/2019-08-05/police-violence-a-leading-cause-of-death-for-young-men Read that. It's only a few days old and quotes Edwards and the Rutgers study. "I want to be clear: When we talk about the leading causes, police violence trails behind some causes that are killing many, many people," Edwards says. "Relative to all causes of death, it's not that frequent. " If you hand select only the causes of death you want to look at, you can arrive at …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:38 PM
3

It's not 5th or 6th.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:19 PM
8

I didn't watch your video. I spent 15 minutes doing my own research. I found several sources that agree that death by police is a thing but certainly not the 6th leading cause of death.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:14 PM
25

False. Death by police is not the 6th leading cause of death.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:35 PM
33

There is no final solution, no ultimate win. Conflict is essential for growth.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:34 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:05 AM
2

Don'tcha you wanta... Want a Fanta??
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:58 PM
2

I grok in fullness. R. Heinlein
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:46 PM
2

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. Friedrich Nietzsche
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:34 PM
1

I hope you find a better use of your time... in order to feel Superior over others. You are accusing me of attempting to feel superior is your projection. You feel superior by telling me how to spend my time as if I am inferior and cannot find more useful things to do. Then you project that onto me in an attempt to silence any further comments. You nailed the coffin shut when you smugly hit the troll button. What else you got?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:30 PM
2

Typically we exercise or practice something to get stronger or better at it. If you are practicing the art of mental gymnastics, of seeing relevance that doesn't exist, what is the end goal in mind? To see relevance of any question to men's rights?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:24 PM
2

Ah, ye olde projection is it??? Bring it on! 😂🤣😂🤣
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:18 PM
1

If you agree this isn't a men's rights issue, why did you join the mental gymnastics team to find a way to contort it into something it's not? Genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:15 PM
1

At the end of the day, both sides of this discussion are merely arguing opinion. Each has it's own version of "scientific facts" to bolster their opinions but neither is more right than the other. Many controversial subjects are like this. But carry on as you like, it's fun to watch.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:12 PM
1

Violent [color] nationalism is a thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:08 PM
1

Toxic masculinity is not a thing.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:09 AM
6

Perhaps you could suggest different departments have their own associate of the month?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:40 AM
1

Operating within the framework that: [An emotional response is] not a well thought out response Your quotes do not all confirm. 1) Fooling ourselves with a strong emotion does not imply we didn't think it through. We might have spent a week angrily thinking about how to respond to something but when we unleashed the response, it did not have the desired result. 2) This one actually speaks to ability to plan and time an emotional response. The right person, the right degree, the right time, the r…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:38 AM
8

Do you have male cashiers that perform better than the females?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:32 PM
3

According to... ?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:57 PM
6

I've had a few friends like this Your sample size is far too small and inherently biased to form any reasonable conclusions. I've had a few friends who think fishing is the only hobby a man should enjoy. Can I reasonably conclude that this is a common issue? You're asking for input as if you're genuinely curious about the validity of your hypothesis. Can any of your relate to this? Have any of you thought about this before? But you've already made up your mind that this is a real problem that ex…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:52 PM
2

Are you saying a man that reacts emotionally to stimuli is less of a man?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 09:13 PM
4

You mean your knives still jump up and randomly assault people on their own? Geez, what kind of knives do you buy???
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:10 PM
9

Yeah, guns don't kill people... People kill people. The knives in your kitchen sit there quietly doing nothing until you grab one and stab somebody with it. Should we enact more knife control?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:06 PM
1

You have no evidence or you would not hesitate to present it. Case closed.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:55 AM
1

Earlier you claimed I was forcing you to do things. Now you claim I am defensive and uncooperative because I won't agree to something before any evidence is presented. If it's not you against me, why the passive-aggressive language? Instead of presenting your evidence you want to argue about why I won't agree beforehand. I'm going to leave you now. I will check back later to see if you are still chasing your tail or if you have presented evidence of some kind that I can examine.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:46 AM
1

Do you realize that only a small group of judges are elected? The rest are appointed. This makes a big difference. And theoretically judges are implored to be impartial. You are assuming all judges are biased. Either way, you haven't presented any evidence that removing gender roles is creating a better judicial system. You have given speculation but no actual evidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:40 AM
1

You can ask all you want. I am not obligated to provide criteria for you.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:33 AM
1

The original perception was never that women are innocent. You are claiming that society has always viewed women as innocent which is false. The vast majority of society does not have authority to punish criminals. Only a teeny tiny percentage does. You are holding society at large accountable for the actions of a very few members comparatively. The only perception of innocence or guilt that matters is that of those with the authority to punish. Is that tiny subset of society biased in favor of …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:31 AM
1

Heh. Nice try. The burden is on you. You made the claim. You want me to believe it. I gave you simple criteria but you ignored it. Your posturing suggests you are insecure in whatever evidence you think you have therefore you need a semblance of agreement to fall back on if your evidence doesn't pan out. Since you refuse to present evidence I can only conclude you have none.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:17 AM
1

If society views women as innocent, why are they receiving more equal punishments? That suggests society does not see them as innocent.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:11 AM
1

Present your evidence or not. We cannot proceed until then.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:01 AM
1

No, you are seeking agreement to your premise based on the assumption that your evidence is credible. Present your evidence for analysis and review or not. We cannot proceed until that happens.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:58 PM
1

Yes, the general narrative of the majority religion that was incorporated into the fabric of the society you are using as an example that believes women are innocent... Actually upholds the idea that none are blameless before God. Your claim is that this society believes women are innocent. I am providing evidence to the contrary. Yes, I am picking a specific example because it is exactly on point. This is how debate works. I have refuted your claim that the society you chose to exemplify the be…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:55 PM
1

Why do you seek agreement before presenting your evidence?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:46 PM
1

You're claiming a firmly Christian society believes that women are innocent - even though the same Christian society believes that Eve, the first woman, is guilty of the first sin? The same Christian society that believes they are all sinners, none are innocent before God? The same Christian society that believes each person, man or woman, must individually work out their salvation through Christ? This same Christian society believes women are innocent? Umm.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:45 PM
1

Is that the same society that is firmly Christian?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:39 PM
1

Who is ours?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:37 PM
1

Do you have any evidence to present?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:35 PM
1

No. I will then take your evidence and test it to determine if it is credible or not.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:31 PM
1

What society has believed that women are innocent, passive, and nurturing?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:30 PM
1

As for proving toxic masculinity exists: What exactly are you asking for proof of? Whatever you have to offer that can substantiate your claim. The onus is on you. You believe toxic masculinity is real and is plaguing civilization. I do not believe toxic masculinity is real. I believe there are toxic behaviors exhibited by men and women but the term toxic masculinity is nothing more than propaganda used to cause harm. If I am wrong, if toxic masculinity is a real thing, it is on you to prove tha…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:27 PM
1

And I agree with you. Women are starting to be treated the same as men in the eyes of the law. But this is not a product of removing gender roles.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:17 PM
2

Again, I'm not forcing you to do anything. We are having a conversation where you put out ideas that are logically in contradiction. I'm pointing this out and showing you the inconsistencies. As for making an argument that toxic masculinity exists. Tell me if you agree or disagree with this next statement. Asking if I agree with a construct of yours is not evidence that something exists. Can you prove that toxic masculinity actually exists independent of anything I may or may not agree with?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:15 PM
1

I'm not forcing you to do anything. I'm working with you to solidify your position. At first you were dealing in absolutes. Now you are taking a more nuanced stance.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:07 PM
1

I disagree, i think it does matter if you are male or female, masculine or feminine. If this is true then you are arguing against your previous position that parity is being reached between sentencing of men and women. It is ok to change your mind but you cannot argue both sides and expect to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:01 PM
2

Evidence about what? You call it personal do's and don'ts but they seem to be quite ubiquitous across the board. Would you disagree? You are still trying to prove your point with an appeal to the masses. Because many people think a certain way does not mean that way is good. If your argument is valid it will stand on it's own merit, not because many people agree. The evidence I ask for is to support your main premise that toxic masculinity is a real thing. From your other posts you don't have a …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:57 PM
1

Religion created monogamy. There was no removal of gender roles. Men were men. Women were women. Religion decided that "God" was most pleased when one man and one woman were bound together in a monogamous relationship under threat of eternal suffering. There is no gender role removal in the equal distribution of judicial punishment. The justice system does not care what you do with your life until you decide to break the law. Whether you are an effeminate man or a masculine woman or any variant …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:38 PM
1

My lifestyle choices are not relevant to this discussion. You asked for explanations, I provided some.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:21 PM
2

I'd disagree that the term is belligerent. One of your arguments about the concept of toxic masculinity is that because people don't agree with it doesn't mean it's not a valid concept. I will apply your argument here. You disagree that the term is belligerent. Because you disagree doesn't nullify the concept. If your argument is logical then you must concede that the term is belligerent. If that is the case, the concept of toxic masculinity is a belligerent one. And the only traits I'm saying R…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:10 PM
1

How would you explain: the switch from polygamy to monogamy as a species Religion. The concept of monogamy was created by religion. the increasingly even representation of prison population More women are finally being given the same sentences as men. Women have always been perpetrators of crime but they have not always been held equally responsible for their actions. the increasingly even representation of doctors, lawyers, or other careers once represented largely by either males or females Af…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:29 PM
3

But I still think belligerent language holts progress in general. Yet you use belligerent language like "toxic masculinity". Can you see why this is a problem? You said earlier that boys / men should be allowed to be who they are or want to be but then you define what they shouldn't be. Translation:. Be who you want as long as it meets Wumbo's approval. How is this idea any different from other expectations of them?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:15 PM
1

Only you Curt, only you.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:36 AM
1

Man up James! lol
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:24 AM
1

That you're a pussy that needs to man up! lol
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:16 AM
1

It works!!
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:14 AM
1

Cool. Let's see how this works. Hey Curt, don't be a pussy, man up!
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:07 AM
1

Very true. But I was asking if we can use 'man up' as a weapon to shame? If somebody is complaining about something we consider trivial, can we tell them to man up in order to silence them?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:02 AM
6

So when somebody has a complaint about something we find trivial we can use 'man up' as a weapon to shame them into silence?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:11 AM
5

And how often does the average guy face that situation? How about more practical examples?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:01 AM
2

What are the rules for proper use of 'man up'?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 12:52 AM
7

No reason? Or ashamed to admit your bigotry?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 12:49 AM
7

That's right! If someone assaults you just suck it up and be real men! Real men aren't bothered by carbon monoxide!
/r/MensRights03/08/19 03:31 PM
2

By offering contradictory advice? How does that help?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 03:08 PM
2

You're welcome. Any ideas on how you will address these problems in your message?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:16 PM
2

While I don't know what it is like to... feel unable to open up, This is not an accurate portrait. Some people feel they are unable to express but by and large this isn't the case. Generally speaking, people are pretty good at expressing but they reach a point where they learn that talking about their problems can create even more of them. For example, if you complain too much you are "that guy". Nobody wants to be that guy. I do know that there is science behind to support the necessity of bein…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:03 PM
3

1) By offering multiple sources of information to learn about the MRA, we give the audience choice. They can come here for various discussions. They can go to mramemes for amusing content. They can go to any MRA website for more. They can watch videos on YouTube. This is exactly the way marketing works. You get the best results by cross-marketing over multiple platforms. 3) What do you hope to gain by questioning this policy?
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:13 PM
2

TV is subdivided into hundreds of channels each dedicated to various kinds of programming. Radio. Books. Schools. Shopping and entertainment venues. Even housing - subdivisions. Your analogy to building strength by gaining mass is still a subdivision - muscle is not one solid mass, it is many many fibers that work together - and to build strength you need to perform different exercises divided by periods of rest during the workout and further divided by periods of rest between workouts. A counte…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:45 AM
4

Perhaps it would serve your purpose to create a sub specifically for MRA memes. Maybe you could call it "mramemes".
/r/MensRights02/08/19 10:48 AM
2

How does a man know he is a man? If you raised a boy to behave and respond as a girl, does he fully immerse and become a girl?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:54 PM
4

What makes a man? Is it the clothes he wears? Is it the way he thinks and feels?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:51 PM
1

Society will address them as what they present. Psychologically they will process and respond as their biological sex, yes?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:45 PM
5

Does that mean one cannot fully transition to become the opposite sex?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:33 PM
0

It is easy enough to note the biological differences. Do you believe there are psychological differences between men and women?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:29 PM
34

You are absolutely correct. So I started to imagine what it would look like to have a burly bearded biker doing a commercial for shelter animals. deep, gruff voice coming from leather-clad biker "These animals need your help!" stern finger points at coach potato watching TV "Get off your ass and go buy three, no, FOUR bags of food and donate them to your local shelter!!" stern finger moves across throat with a scritching sound "Don't make me say it twice!" I can't do this with a straight face lo…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 02:35 PM
5

As with many things, data depends on who you get it from: Figure 1 shows the age-adjusted suicide rates in the United States for each year from 2001 through 2017 for the total population, and for males and females presented separately. The suicide rate among males remained nearly four times higher (22.4 per 100,000 in 2017) than among females (6.1 per 100,000 in 2017). In 2001: F = 4.1 M = 18.2 A steady increase is observed over the years. In 2017: F = 6.1 M = 22.4 https://www.nimh.nih.gov/healt…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 11:44 AM
0

Uh huh. And how long have you been having these hallucinations?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:15 PM
2

I was trying to understand your position of "work does not equal results" in the context of your assertion that the poster you were replying to was making an unfair assumption. But since you want to be a dick about the whole thing, you can just fuck right off with your self-righteous ass.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:40 PM
3

Yes, I know this. And I gave a perfect example of this and so ask if the same fee should be paid for different levels of result. If two different people work equally hard but produce different degrees of result - one being clearly better than the other - should they still be paid the same?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:21 PM
2

That doesn't make any sense. Will you restate your position?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:07 PM
9

If I try my best to produce the same results as somebody else but I clearly fall short, I should expect to be paid as much as somebody that actually produces results? Let's say my car breaks down. It needs major engine work to restore it. I know two mechanics that say they can fix it. They both charge the same fee. So I choose one, wait two weeks, get my car back. Two possible outcomes: The car runs but it performs like garbage. Clearly the work is sub par and has not restored the engine to prop…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:54 AM
3

Do you believe we should selectively choose which innocent men to support?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:41 AM
1

Ah I see. Instead of engaging in conversation you want to go your own way. Which is antithetical to your ideas about civilization. And you don't just walk away. Your demand to be left alone (a core principle of mtgow) is delivered with sophomoric insults which is also counter productive to being civilized. You accuse me of the very thing you are doing. And you call that civilization?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:31 AM
0

Does that mean you can't defend your position?
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:02 PM
2

A bear chasing you isn't going to give you feel good chemicals unless you are an adrenaline junkie. The average person is going to be scared out of their mind. This is a bad example.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 10:33 PM
0

You support a caste system where some demographics labor and others do not?
/r/MensRights29/07/19 10:23 PM
0

Why is it a horrible idea to expect each individual to be responsible for themselves and contribute to their own well-being?
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:40 PM
1

Nice try with the back pedal. I'll debunk you one last time then send you on your way. If people are so averse to violence, to seeing somebody get hurt, why do so many of them stand around in a circle watching, taking videos, of people hurting each other? It starts in school and persists through adulthood. When a fight breaks out the crowd gathers round chanting, "kick his ass!". They aren't in a hurry to stop it before somebody gets hurt. Now, you've gone and turned this conversation into somet…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:47 AM
1

Ut oh, resorting to ad homs about non-existent issues. Yeah, you lost, gg man.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:01 AM
1

You can argue until the cows come home. The fact remains, people enjoy watching people in violent conflict.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:00 AM
1

As I said, depends on who you get your information from. Which says the answer is unclear.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:31 AM
1

Movies aren't real. Video games aren't real. The irony of your position is that people who love fake violence are more adverse to real violence. And there is plenty of science to back that up. Oh but that IS the sweet irony - it's fake but getting more and more believable. And it brings in big bucks. Realism in CGI is becoming amazing and people are eating it up. It's funny because the mainstream argument is that violence in media spawns violence in real life. Thus the big push to stop it. But i…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:21 AM
1

Actually, it depends on who you ask. https://dailyfreepress.com/blog/2018/04/29/dropping-the-gloves-hockey-is-better-than-its-ever-been-but-where-are-the-viewers/ Hot off the press an article about declining viewers.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:16 AM
1

Yeah, I mean, people all the way to ancient Rome go to a blood sport for the popcorn and hotdogs. Totally! You know, fight club isn't a thing. For real! People spend billions on action movies with bloody violence and gore and all kinds of horrific scenes because they are researching anthropology final exam. Nah, nobody EVER pays to see people actually get hurt hurt. Just kinda hurt. And they don't spend a small fortune on Mortal Kombat because of the fatalities. No no. It's the scenery they are …
/r/MensRights28/07/19 12:57 AM
4

Aww, somebody needs a friend.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 12:37 AM
2

Objective or not, if you were to bubble wrap the UFC it would lose a lot of fans. Remember NASCAR before Nextel? It was a massive sport. It's never been the same since and steadily declining.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 12:27 AM
1

nobody wants to see an injury Wrong. MMA style UFC is massive with injuries all the time
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:02 PM
0

I didn't read the article. I considered the situation. Four people: presumably with phones have no money to pool? don't know a single person who can pick them up?
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:51 PM
-3

As important as the million other factors involved, many we cannot identify. No. Your point was to say that coddling young boys make a "big difference" compared to other boys that you aren't raising. With so many unknown variables about these other boys, you really have no way to know what is helping them and hurting them. You believe that your sons are doing well because of your parenting. You may or may not even be what is helping them. You believe it because you want to consider yourself a go…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:14 PM
5

Correct on all points. Sun Tzu teaches that warfare is based on deception. The MRM is growing beyond feminist control. They don't like that one bit. One method commonly used to sabotage the enemy is to create confusion and stir unrest within the ranks. These types of posts are becoming a daily occurrence here. It is a ploy to divide and conquer. With a lack of male role models and the increasing feminist dogma infiltrating even the most mundane aspects of life (shaving products for example) youn…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:00 PM
5

To judge the outcome of child rearing by one variable is an exercise in confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:51 AM
1

Says the one using "cunt" in an attempt to debate? lol
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:44 AM
7

He's not a man. And he never will become a man if he is taught to behave like a woman.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:42 AM
1

Triggered.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:41 AM
7

Mods here don't consistently enforce their policies.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:25 AM
4

Three teens and a woman don't know to call a tow truck?
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:20 AM
1

Lol The truth hurts that much eh? Run away 😂
/r/MensRights27/07/19 02:14 AM
1

Just thought I'd brag about how many of you extremists I've triggered. But you haven't. That's your narcissism. You play the victim then brag about being a bully. lol You guys need to stop trying to make this a cult and stop getting so emotional when there is internal disagreement Projection. How is this thing ever going to get bigger It is bigger and bigger each passing day. There is nothing you can do to stop it trollie 🤣 if you don't allow for a dialogue without accusing every dissenter of be…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 02:11 AM
1

It's funny though. Millions upon millions use social media and many are horrible but somehow they do not represent the "norm". Yeah, I'm not convinced.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:07 AM
2

That's exactly what they won't acknowledge - personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:01 AM
7

If false allegations cause real and tangible harm, is that no different than any other crime that causes similar harm? Why let this particular perpetrator get a slap on the wrist while the accused is permanently harmed?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:25 PM
8

Certainly, the burden of proof rests on the accuser. But if you have no deterrent to a crime in a culture of believeallwomen, you get exactly what we have, accusations of rape over an accidental shoulder brush 30 years ago. Justice for all?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:20 PM
6

Why only false allegations? If your concern is that a perpetrator won't confess if there is a negative consequence, why have any punishment for any crime?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:53 PM
10

The purpose of judicial punishment is to deter the would be criminal. If you plan on stealing a car, you do so with the knowledge that when caught you will face fines and possible prison time. If there is no repercussion for making a false accusation, what will deter them?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:47 PM
1

Your persecution complex is flaring up again. Remember, you don't earn victim points here 😉
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:17 PM
1

I see you lost another debate. Keep trying though, maybe one day somebody will believe your lies.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:44 PM
7

munchmunchmunch Why?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:27 PM
4

Do you believe there is a lack of equality of opportunity?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:26 PM
3

Yeah, it's one thing to ask for women to apply. It's another to only accept women.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:34 PM
1

Go search, see what you find.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:31 AM
0

Heh, nice try.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:27 AM
0

A few problems with your premise: • Being less evil than somebody else does not make you better than them • We did and still do torture POWs. If you aren't afraid of unpleasant reality, search this: Atrocities committed by the allies in WWII.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:25 AM
2

I go to the gym 3-4 days a week (every other day consecutively). Where I go it's more women in the morning, more men in the evening.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:48 PM
4

Why? You don't like the idea that the "good guys" weren't always so good?
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:59 PM
5

When you get time and are ready for some unpleasant reality, do a search for atrocities committed by the allies during WWII.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:53 PM
2

And my point is that men committing violence is acceptable under certain conditions but he never actually benefits by it. If he is violent at the wrong time (but he believes he is right) it doesn't end well. If he is not violent at the right time (because he believes it is wrong) it doesn't end well. If he is violent at the right time he risks his life in exchange for mental and physical health issues that are deemed trivial and his sacrifice is soon forgotten. Sometimes even used as humor - jok…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:43 PM
2

Let's start with... Concentration camps for Japanese living in the US.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:05 PM
3

Violence = Toxic Masculinity until an invasion takes place. Then it's all, "Get your ass out there and defend us you coward!! Kill them before they kill us!!" If a man uses violence to defend a woman's honor he can be branded a violent offender in need of legal repercussions What's wrong with you?!?! Violence solves nothing!!! If a man isn't first in line to violently fight for his country in times of war he can be branded a useless chicken shot coward. There is no winning move.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:44 PM
0

Adoption does not work internationally unless they've changed the laws. In my experience, if a child is adopted from a foreign country they must still be naturalized as a US citizen. If some people are legally your parents, why should you not have the same nationality? That would mean if your parents moved from the US to France but you stayed behind you would suddenly become a French citizen. It does not work like that.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 03:04 PM
-1

What you promise to do has no bearing on the legal status of citizenship. Somebody designed a nifty way to initially determine who is a citizen of what country - origin of birth. Simple and effective. If you are born in France, you are not a citizen of the US. You are a citizen of France. You can move and become a citizen of the US by legal means. But if you aren't born in a location delineated as the US, you are not a US citizen at birth. This case wants to bypass the system. My guess is that t…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 02:40 PM
-2

It's a way around immigration laws and grants instant citizenship to non citizens.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:03 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:08 AM
1

No worries. Great discussion.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:49 AM
2

I read from the screenshot that if somebody is not found guilty, that does not make them innocent. This is exactly the idea that acquittal does not prove innocence. To which you agreed, at first. But now you disagree. If a woman who has not been caught cheating does not make her innocent of cheating - the reciprocal is that she is guilty, just not caught. This is what the screenshot is alluding to: A man who has not been found guilty of rape does not mean he is innocent. He is guilty but not cau…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:08 AM
3

Initially you declared her statement to be true: This is true, Then you go on to defend the supposed truth: much like how if a woman hasn’t been caught cheating it doesn’t mean she isn’t a cheater. But you don't agree with the logical conclusion that all women are cheaters. If you cannot prove a woman has lived her entire life without cheating, that must mean she is not innocent of being a cheater. She just hasn't been caught. Do you see the problem?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:36 PM
5

Therefore not all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:23 PM
3

Do you agree with the statement, "All women are cheaters just some of them haven't been caught" ?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:11 PM
1

It is ok to realize you made a mistake. Much more admirable than pretending you did not.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:08 PM
1

'Often' is not a number. Exactly, which is why it shocked me that you used it in your argument. Your premise is that people are often killed by police. That is utter rubbish and nothing more than fear mongering.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:03 PM
1

I'm surprised at this Tench, you're usually very keen on numbers. Four years in a row, police nationwide fatally shoot nearly 1,000 people https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/four-years-in-a-row-police-nationwide-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000-people/2019/02/07/0cb3b098-020f-11e9-9122-82e98f91ee6f_story.html Ok, if 1000 people have died by police shootings over the past four years, that means in 2015 only 1000 people died... Out of 53 million interactions. Can you calculate the occurrence r…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:56 PM
1

Out of how many total police interactions?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:25 PM
1

You can defend your position all you want. Fact remains buddy, you hyper exaggerated your claim to make it something it's not. If the police made contact with citizens 53 million times in 2015, your postulation that people often die during police contact is complete garbage. The 'often' rate of millions is in the millions. Millions of people are not dying at the hands of police each year. Your logic is flawed. You made a mistake. Accept it and move on.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:14 PM
1

I'll take that as a no.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:46 PM
-3

Have you completed the final exam question?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:22 PM
-5

difference between saying someone is suspicious and saying someone is an "abusive criminal who wanted to assault someone". Do you have the actual recording of the call made to the police? People often die when the police show up, Wow. (2015) The portion of U.S. residents age 16 or older who had contact with the police in the preceding 12 months... ...53.5 million Source: https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6406 So if people often die when police show up, you're saying that MILLIONS of …
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:36 PM
-10

Community watch programs are designed to work as you describe - report suspicious people who are standing around houses they've never been seen at before. Sounds like a false alarm with a no harm no foul result. Why does this bother you so much?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 04:40 PM
-4

Nice try. However, bigotry is still bigotry no matter how you defend it.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:35 PM
-6

Well this is odd. A few hours ago you were raging about being an MGTOW which according to you should mean not hating on women but rather avoid them. Now here you are raging about women. Go figure.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:25 AM
1

ROFL!! Doesn't want to be told what to do. Tells somebody else what to do. Complains about ad homs. Uses ad homs in every post. You are so full of shit. Take care. lol
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:29 AM
2

lolol But you don't want those crazy hermits in your pure MGTOW sub. They need to move out and find their own sub. How very inclusive of you.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:10 AM
3

Heh, no, I'm all about you going whatever is your own way. To each their own. YOU want to impose purity sanctions on MGTOW to fit your preferences.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:04 AM
2

Eminem begins to play I'M the real feminist Yes the really real feminist all you other real feminists are really just terrorists So won't the real feminist Please stand up, please stand up
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:01 AM
1

Nitey nite!
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:47 AM
4

Some actually do go full hermit. You don't. Go your own way. Quit yer bitchin and actually go your own way. This is your message but you won't do it yourself.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:46 AM
3

Nite nite sweetie!
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:43 AM
1

Anyway lmao you said you'd find examples of shit that triggers you on r/againstmensrights. Nope. Just another lie from a feminist. Where are they? I looked at those two sticked posts and I don't see what's wrong with them. Exactly what I told you would happen. You've stewed in your shit pile for so long you forgot that it really is a pile of shit. I sent you the bit about how they're actually not against men's rights, just the toxic culture within men's rights communities. Aww, you sweet, sweet …
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:42 AM
1

Silly feminist, projection is for kids.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:20 AM
2

Yes you did send links. Yes I went over to see. I found that sub to be full of hate and bigotry. No I won't copy pasta the hate and bigotry for you. I gave you specific locations to look at. You have yet to acknowledge the hate and bigotry.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:19 AM
1

So you claim to have gone your own way yet you still complain about group dynamics?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:15 AM
6

You don't like them. They don't like you. They go their own way. Perhaps you should go yours. You'll be ok.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:51 PM
2

Lol. You keep on drinking the Kool aid buddy.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 08:32 PM
1

It's funny. I asked you for links to begin with and you provided none. Instead you try to turn it around asking me for links. Nice try, Sandy.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 08:31 PM
2

Heh, I'm as antifeminist as they come. No trigger here lol.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 08:26 PM
1

Heh. Thanks, I think.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:36 PM
3

No, that's your interpretation of what you think he did and it triggered you into AHHHHHH mode. I'm starting to see the writing on the wall - feminist apologist - easily triggered by text you don't like - calls others out but won't accept responsibility for self...
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:58 PM
6

Then you should have plenty of links to very civil discussion about the subject of "Men do not deserve rights." heh, me thinks you can't see the forest for all the trees blocking your view.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:53 PM
1

lol You don't like a response: The way you phrased your reply would suggest And you go into red alert mode sirens blaring!!! AHHHHHH!!!!!!! lolol!
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:46 PM
7

No offense but you sound like an apologist. Go have a look at Againstmensrights and show me posts where they don't think men are evil, rapists, bad fathers etc.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:39 PM
4

in the voice of Morgan Freeman
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:35 PM
1

That's great! swoosh
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:32 PM
1

James, you haven't been on point lately. You used to offer kind words that hit the mark. Lately you are way off. Feeling ok bud?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:29 PM
-3

AITA for hearing - You Dumb Banshee ?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:20 PM
2

Lol Proving once again this sub can be about anything and everything.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:16 PM
-5

What is the first rule of fight club?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:24 AM
1

I went to check it out bro. Very strange place bro. And annoying as hell bro with all the bros going bro after every bro thing they say bro! Bro!
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:43 AM
1

And the Troll of the Week award goes to... 🏆
/r/MensRights21/07/19 10:57 PM
3

Found the feminist!! 😂
/r/MensRights21/07/19 10:54 PM
2

Hmm. You're triggered by others being triggered. ☑️ Feedback loop
/r/MensRights21/07/19 06:39 PM
2

Me thinks you don't fully grasp the whole war thing.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:12 PM
1

Did you expect something different?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:00 PM
10

Let's find out! When the enemy shows up you go first and report back when finished.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 03:57 PM
16

Or we could spoon feed you so you don't break a nail typing your search into duckduckgo.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 03:54 PM
6

Technically it is. The MSM has been on the attack for a while now. This war against men has been unchallenged for a long time and a counter offensive is taking shape. They don't like that at all.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:49 PM
8

Do you also believe women are oppressed?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 10:36 AM
-2

Heh, I'm not the original commenter you were trying to de-platform. Perhaps you should rage less and think about what you type. Either way, your response to me continues to demonstrate your illogical approach to empathy. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:11 PM
-3

Your arguments do not support your position. You demand wholesale empathy from others regardless of their personal stance on an issue. Yet you reserve your empathy for only those you deem worthy. Fail.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 05:59 PM
4

It's funny how we accept certain risks and reject others. For example, if somebody pointed a gun at your head and said: You have a 50% chance to die in the next 10 seconds and a 50% chance to live. If you live you will be given millions of dollars to enjoy the rest of your life. Would you gladly take that risk? How about: Do this {dangerous thing} and you have a 50% chance to earn fame and notoriety and a 50% chance to die a horrible death. Which do you choose? Or even more mundane: Texting whil…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:52 PM
1

Nope. I stand by what I asked. Human Rights and empathy are two different things. I'm asking about rights. You don't want to discuss rights. You want to talk about empathy. I'm not here to talk about empathy. If you cannot answer the question I asked about rights, that's fine. However, my subject of interest remains the same, rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:32 PM
1

Rights: Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of another. I'm asking about what rights women do not have. Can you help me with that?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:30 AM
2

Sure you did, you changed that last paragraph that I asked about.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:41 PM
3

Ah, you edited your comment. Interesting.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 10:36 PM
7

Heh, you try to twist scripture to fit your personal agenda. When confronted with scripture that refutes your desires you tuck tail and run. If you're trying to win converts in the crowd you're failing miserably.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:12 PM
2

This sounds like /s material, is it?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:02 PM
5

And still no answer.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:01 PM
7

Your question attempts to change the topic at hand. Unless you specify otherwise I will take that to mean you won't be answering the question I asked.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:51 PM
2

What rights do women not have that need fighting for?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:47 PM
7

Jesus also spoke of the virtue of forgiveness and pacifism. Matthew 5:39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. Matthew 5:43 - 48 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends ra…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:45 PM
2

But its still false to say that it is all bad. Perhaps this needs to be edited.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:27 PM
5

What specific special needs are not being met and who is responsible for them?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:22 PM
2

What good comes from feminism today?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:21 PM
1

What was your original point?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:17 PM
1

Source? What are some other data elements such as how many positive reactions compared to negative? It can be said that even one negative reaction is one too many. However, if the ratio of positive to negative is something like 10:1, or even 5:1, that's still an overwhelmingly positive general reaction. At 5:1 that's 83% positive reactions. But I'm just speculating. Do you have any data on this?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:13 PM
1

That's right, nobody said anything about female incompetency. You got all worked up over nothing. Too funny!
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:43 PM
1

Ah, there's your mistake right there. Calling females incompetent is another. Who said this?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:32 PM
2

This is an excellent synopsis. We are exactly the product of our struggle.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:22 PM
0

Heh, you can foam at the mouth all you like - it doesn't mean anything. I asked a question relevant to a post. You interrupted with your nonsense. The only one displaying poor behavior is you.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:17 PM
3

Ooo, struck a nerve did I? Instead of offering a counter point you go straight to ad hominem. lol
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:54 PM
5

Why do you suppose men are seen as more competent? Is it because they are more competent?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:52 PM
1

Youre moving goalposts bud. I never claimed that those responses are more frequent than anything. No moving anything. This is exactly my point. You want us to believe that shaming victims is so prevelant but you have no evidence to support that. It would be the equivalent of me saying car crashes happen often, which they do. Car crash data is readily available. Your victim shaming data is not available at all. If youre interested why dont you just ask some of the rape victims on this sub if they…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 09:53 AM
3

Your study only shows information about incident rates among groups, not frequency. I can say that more people die in a plane crash compared to a car crash. This sounds like planes are unsafe because I left out the frequency of plane crashes and car crashes. When we look at how often each occur, we find that cars crash exponentially more than planes. This is mostly due to how many more cars are in service than planes. So. Do you have any hard data on how often somebody shames a rape victim?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:03 PM
3

This is merely conjecture, however I think the reason for down voting you is the large brush you used to paint the bulk of society as assholes who see value in people who haven't been raped. Your statement is unprovable and does not fall under any category of truth.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:36 PM
10

Heh, sign up or face fines and imprisonment. Is that your go-to method of getting people to do what you want?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:35 PM
9

Umm. The draft still exists. Research selective service.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:26 PM
4

Do you have any credible evidence of your theory?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:24 AM
3

Ah yes, another one shows to blame and shame.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:37 PM
3

If bad behavior is not a gender specific issues, why use gender specific language?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:40 AM
2

Praise only sets expectation if the one being praised needs said praise to experience healthy self-esteem. By itself praise is nothing more than a positive communication about something. I can say, "Wow, you grow the most beautiful flowers!" I'm not saying, "If you don't continue to grow the most beautiful flowers I will see you as less of a person." I'm simply giving you a compliment on how beautiful your flowers are. Anything else you read into that statement is purely your own. You cannot hol…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:15 PM
2

We are already aware of the issues you mentioned, how can we become more aware? I disagree with your analysis that praise causes the problems described at the extreme end of the spectrum. When our maturity level is in a childlike state we can see a negative reciprocal from praise. But once we mature past childhood we stop feeling this way. For example, on the job if a supervisor credits a mature employee for a job well done, the other mature employees don't take it as a slight against their perf…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:30 PM
2

I see. I will modify the question. If praise is equally helpful as hurtful, why use it?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:59 PM
2

If praise hurts more than it helps, why praise at all?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:23 PM
2

People are sheep. Feed them and they keep coming back for more.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:36 AM
2

How long does it take for information to become irrelevant?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:33 AM
-1

Heh, your opening post has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:13 PM
-1

And another brave post without a connection to men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:57 PM
0

Aww, your fee fees got hurt. Instead of being a reactionary gay teen, try to answer this question. Does group pride in any form harm any other group?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 09:48 AM
1

LOL!
/r/MensRights09/07/19 08:58 AM
2

You asked. Sometimes the truth is not pleasant.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:32 AM
2

You rambled a paragraph yet failed to answer the question. Interesting.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:31 AM
5

How many feminist coal miners join the ranks each year?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:26 AM
2

Feminists want supremacy. MRA's want equality.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:22 AM
0

Yes. Notice they didn't respond.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:34 PM
1

Exactly. Straight pride and white pride does not harm gay pride or black pride.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:29 PM
1

Your statement about men is confrontational. By your logic you should not be saying these things.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 09:35 AM
1

You again? heh
/r/MensRights07/07/19 09:21 PM
12

What employer showed you their books indicating the women were paid less to do the same job as a man?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:10 PM
7

No competition required for reproductive success. The 10% male population would be housed like horses and farmed for sperm. You won't be having a 5-some with 4 women. You will be strapped down to a table while your fluids are collected. Perhaps you're into that?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:04 PM
5

Gaki-Sama, you have me laughing my ass off at this line: it sounds like you'd prefer to remain with your blinkers on I am envisioning this delusional person running around with blinkers on screaming, "The patriarchy is coming! The patriarchy is coming!" Domo arigato!!
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:56 PM
1

Don't worry, a mod will be around shortly to draw an imperceivable connection between this and men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:04 PM
3

Nice list. A few thoughts. The gym is not viable for some people. Physical limitations, conditions, and such. Eating cleaner is definitely good. More water, yup yup! Hobbies are not required to be productive in order to have a positive effect.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:57 PM
6

That makes sense. If you give generic advice about a subject that is particularly specific to each person, how will it help them?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:04 PM
4

What's the path to increasing self-love?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:59 PM
1

So long as you continue like this we are unable to proceed. When you can control your temper and hold a civil conversation, we can continue.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 06:58 PM
6

If there was ever a concise display of exactly what the Men's Rights Movement is facing, this video perfectly captures it. On one hand I am so grateful that you posted this as it will become quintessential in demonstrating how the left is petrified by anybody with an opposing view and seeks to de-platform them through lies and manipulation. On the other I hate that you posted this video because it removes all doubt that perhaps this war has been overdramatized and things are not as bad as they s…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 02:55 PM
1

Still foaming at the mouth I see. You'll be ok, someday.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:50 AM
0

Heh. And you know this, how exactly?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:54 PM
1

Something that really stands out to me in your response is that you claim feminism is helping men but when asked specifically how, you don't have an answer. Also, you aren't very friendly at all. Your representation of feminism is sketchy at best while your demeanor toward somebody asking questions about your religion is atrocious. You know how there are stereotypes of the classic radfem foaming at the mouth about the evil conspiracy that is everything male? You are doing a great job at looking …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:11 AM
1

so, are we just gonna ignore the whole "several US states voting to restrict abortion rights" or what? I acknowledged there are issues still with reproductive rights of both men and women. It is not accurate to say I ignored the subject. Given that the problem exists for all of us, if feminism wants to champion the women's side that's fine. The men's rights movement is here to champion the cause of men's rights. because that's a pretty obvious one and yeah if you ignore everything that goes agai…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:21 PM
1

If feminism was created to fight for women's rights and women have the same rights as men, why does feminism still exist?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:53 AM
1

I agree. Both men and women face issues with reproductive rights. Is that it?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:06 AM
1

What rights do women not have?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:00 AM
1

Does feminism fight for women's rights?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 12:46 AM
1

Food for thought. If somebody points out an inaccuracy in the video and you casually dismiss it like it never happened... You aren't going to inspire many people to watch the video. Like myself. Have a good day though!
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:42 AM
5

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:33 AM
7

sips mug of tears Wow, so salty!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/19 09:51 PM
1

I have not experienced that but my mileage varies from yours.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:24 PM
1

What you describe happens frequently in religious circles. It's a survival mechanism to grow the religion. The pressure to have children is not near as bad outside of that environment. Also, younger men are not given vasectomies as easily as you want to believe.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 09:35 AM
0

Many books create a foundation for new ideas. This doesn't make them good books to read.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:33 PM
2

Who pressures women to have children?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:31 PM
3

Ooo, your feelings must really be hurt to keep going on like this after declaring you would stop. Sounds like more pointless whining that you pointlessly whine about. But hey, you do you bro.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:46 PM
2

Translation: You started whining some more then realized you were whining and corrected yourself. Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:34 PM
5

You have made it clear that you believe your sensitivity over whatever bothers you is acceptable in your mind while others being sensitive to what bothers them is not acceptable. This behavior has a name - hypocrisy. Now, show me the stoicism you demand of others and man up without whining to me in another post of how your feelings are hurt because of my assertiveness. Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:16 PM
5

So aren't you being sensitive about others being sensitive? I'm confused. Sensitivity over female bs is bad. Sensitivity over people being sensitive is ok?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:57 PM
7

Somebody did not study the reading material before coming to class.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:57 PM
1

Actually I mocking your thumb in the ears response. Carry on!
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:49 PM
0

I have not previously encountered this definition of toxic masculinity. As I understand, toxic masculinity does not enforce anything, it describes something. Typically, the set of behaviors belonging to men that any person finds offensive for any reason. Still though, you were countering the claim that belief in something can be toxic then used a toxic physical action for support. I agree that physical abuse is toxic. I also agree that beliefs can be toxic. Action is motivated by belief. Remembe…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:51 PM
3

Eh, that’s just kinda basic etiquette though. If I meet friends at a restaurant, I wait for them before I’m seated, No. This isn't basic etiquette. This is standard traditionalism. You may not remember, but it used to be traditional to go to the table and wait for your date / friend to arrive. This ensured there was no wait for your friend as the table was ready upon arrival. This tradition changed over time into now waiting at the door. and when we get our food, I always wait until everyone has…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:57 AM
2

If you are not in charge, why are you lecturing about lecturing?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:42 AM
-8

You switched from debating the toxicity of beliefs to the toxicity of actions. Did you mean to do that?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:39 AM
0

I know you are, but what am I??? 😉
/r/MensRights23/06/19 10:01 AM
2

I get it. You are full of shit, lol. And that's ok. You make me laugh. I like that!
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:16 AM
2

Well that's an interesting way to back pedal.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:33 PM
0

lol Good bot!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:10 PM
3

Ok, now you've attempted to move the goal posts going wayyy out into left field. Shame can be a useful tool to affect behavior. Should it be used in an infinite loop with no exit? Hell no. If you design a no win situation that uses shame to enforce compliance with no way out, you are abusing yourself or others.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:09 PM
1

Ooo, entrench with insult, nice move. Doesn't absolve you the mistake though.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:04 PM
2

"Mother" Pink Floyd Mother, do you think they'll drop the bomb? Mother, do you think they'll like the song? Mother, do you think they'll try to break my balls? Mother, should I build the wall? Mother, should I run for president? Mother, should I trust the government? Mother, will they put me in the firing line? Is it just a waste of time? Hush now baby, baby, don't you cry. Mamma's gonna make all of your nightmares come true. Mamma's gonna put all of her fears into you. Mamma's gonna keep you ri…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:46 PM
4

Working to improve oneself is good. Shaming oneself or others because they aren't working to improve establishes a system of punishment with no way to satisfy a "winning" condition. You can never be your best self because you don't know who that is or what it looks like. If you improve something today, that is a good thing. If you make no improvement tomorrow, do you want me to shame you for that? If you improve something today and tomorrow you backslide, do you want me to shame you for that? I …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:38 PM
8

I was with you until here, If I'm not working towards being my best self, should I feel shame? Again, yes. Your "best self" cannot be qualified. You can never define your best self because you don't have access to all the information about your skills, talents, limitations etc. Without this information you cannot know when you have actually achieved your "best self". See where the problem lies? Without knowing where the finish line is you can never reach it. Let's say somebody makes it to that p…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:04 PM
2

I like how you told somebody how they shouldn't be, If she's not a lady, you don't have to be chivalrous. Then you go on to say, You can't tell me how I should or shouldn't be, mate. Perfect hypocrite. A+
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:31 PM
8

We should also be wary of deception. Many people ride the tide of what's trending. Today we hate men? DOWN WITH MEN! Oh, today we like men? MASCULINITY IS BEAUTIFUL! It happens frequently. Some people will change their position to align with the current trend in order to gain or stay popular. Hollywood is notorious for it.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:27 PM
1

Only a qualified, trained professional can diagnose your condition.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:05 PM
1

OMG!!! I am not worthy!!! 🤣
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:03 PM
1

This isn't about me Ethan. I am not your straw man. This is about the irrational fear of being watched at the level of psychosis where the subject is demanding the entire population be physically restricted from looking at them - because feelings. This is about offering help through treatment and therapy.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:02 PM
1

Looking at you does not cause harm. If it bothers you to be watched, I recommend seeking professional help. Scopophobia is the fear of being looked at, seen or stared at. The origin of the word Scopo is Greek (meaning see, view, sight, look at or examine) and phobia is Greek (meaning fear). Scopophobia is considered to be a social phobia, which is discussed on the home page. Scopophobia is also known as Scoptophobia. Symptoms If you have scoptophobia, you might go out of your way to avoid situat…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:35 PM
1

No no Ethan. No person has a "right" to be comfortable. That is completely not a thing.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:16 PM
1

Do you believe that your feeling take precedence over the rights of others?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:01 PM
1

Your feelings are not enough to justify controlling others. That's called a dictatorship. It is often taught that staring is impolite. We shame people who stare when we wish they wouldn't. All based on feelings, not any actual harm done. There is no criminal wrong being committed by looking at somebody even if it makes them uncomfortable. In fact we do that very thing when we interrogate suspects. We stare at them for the express purpose of making them uncomfortable in the hopes they will reveal…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:10 PM
3

Whether a person wants to casually glance or watch intently, it is their prerogative. You are not entitled to tell another person where they can look or for how long.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:50 PM
3

We are agreed then. Free transportation for women is discriminatory in nature and will not solve any problems. Good conversation!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:35 PM
4

Ah yes. You can draw the parallel! Very good! If you do not wish to be seen, do not go to public places. You have no control of what I look at. None. Zero. Zilch. Whether you wear a storm trooper body suit or nothing at all, if you are in public, I am rightfully able to look at you all I want. Don't like it? Don't go to public places.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:34 PM
1

What you said was, "Every man is a potential rapist under the right conditions." If you setup these supposed "right conditions," according to you every man will then commit rape. Are you now saying that some men will NOT rape even under the right conditions?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:04 PM
3

I don't need context to understand that discrimination against men is never going to improve society.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:00 PM
1

It's ok that you cannot see the parallel that I drew.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:58 PM
1

You can poke at it all you want. But until you can factually define the "right conditions" under which a man will uncontrollably rape somebody in every single case, all you have is an opinion.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:56 PM
3

Enacting discriminatory legislation for any reason is a failing proposition.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:49 PM
4

An awful proposal with an even worse rationalization. You want to make a shit hole country even worse than it already is using a solution that is known to fail. And they wonder why some people lose faith in humanity. Nah. Can't be stuff like this, this is gold right here!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:54 PM
4

You know it is an imperfect solution that will create more problems. And you still support it. Maybe we should apply this same technique to all our problems. Let's execute only women who falsely accuse somebody of a crime. I know it's an imperfect solution but in a way it's still good - the woman will never falsely accuse somebody again! Gee, what could possibly go wrong with this way of handling problems?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:35 PM
2

Why do they try to hide their vagenda? Isn't it obvious by now?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:30 PM
1

You stated that the possibility of all men being potential rapists is true under the right conditions. You cannot define those conditions therefore your assertion is not supported by anything. It is ok to have untenable opinions. That does not make them true though. I can say that anything is possible. Without any evidence to support my statement it is merely an opinion. I can say it is 100% possible that you are a rapist. Do I have any evidence? No. Is my statement reasonable without evidence? …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:32 PM
1

Just did bro. lol Be well!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:51 PM
1

It seems the roids are inhibiting your cognitive ability. Might want to lay off them a bit. If you say ALL women go to the gym with the intention of only exercising and there is evidence that SOME women go to the gym solely for the attention then your assertion is false. This all boils down to motivation and intent. Some women only go to the gym to work out. Some women only go to the gym to garner attention. You can flex your biceps all you want but you cannot change this fact. Not ALL women go …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:50 PM
3

Your premise is built on a lack of information. You cannot define the right conditions for something to happen therefore you cannot qualify the event as probable. In order to create a statical probability for something, you must define the conditions for which the event can occur. It is probable for me to die by meteor impact today ONLY if certain conditions are met: • I must be struck by a meteor • The wounds inflicted by the meteor must be the cause of my death Now. What is the potential of me…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:35 PM
0

I give you an A for effort but I see you aren't familiar with how this works. Ok. You made a blanket statement that claims ALL women go to the gym for no other reason than to exercise. I have called you out on that citing your assertion to be false. All it takes to prove you wrong is for me to have one case of a woman who goes to the gym for the attention of other patrons. Psst. Guess what? I have more than one woman on record saying they go to the gym because they like the attention from guys w…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:09 PM
-1

Ah yes, because you know every woman that attends every gym and you know exactly why they go. Your omniscience is not a real thing. But keep doing you bro. lol
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:52 AM
1

lol! Apparently you do, or you wouldn't be orbiting me right now.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:45 AM
1

lol James, you're so full of shit but you make us laugh! Thanks for the good times!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:44 AM
1

Women go to the gym to workout just like me and you, not to be seen and take a couple selfies This is false. Some women actually do go to the gym for the attention of others.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:37 AM
10

I post comments in public but I don't want you looking at them! Why are you reading my comments? I don't want you eyeing my words!! Get lost you perv!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:34 AM
3

What are the "right circumstances" that will compel an individual to rape?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:13 AM
0

I'm not convinced by your personal experience that games are not useful as a hobby. Thank you for sharing though.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:25 AM
3

To make a comparison. You buy a game, you play a game, you beat the game, then you buy a new game, play the game beat the game etc etc. You buy some wood, you cut some wood, you finish the wood, then you buy some new wood, cut the wood, finish the wood etc etc. I see no real difference here. There are a shitload of hobbies out there that will serve you a lot better. Do you have evidence to support this statement? People sit on their ass pushing buttons and staring at screens way too much these d…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:14 AM
2

Why do you exclude video games as a valid, therapeutic hobby?
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:55 AM
3

Do you think it should be changed to be more consistent with the feminism entry?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:08 PM
8

The last paragraph, about the perceived disadvantage resulting from loss of entitlement and privilege, do you believe this is true?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:38 PM
3

Nice, give the woman a free meal with no expectation of contributing in return. Gee, with friends like you who needs enemies?
/r/MensRights08/06/19 04:41 PM
2

Yes. Roukan wants you to be angry and ready to do something but not actually do anything. It's how you win wars. Keep the enemy baited and poised with no means to act. Eventually they weaken through exhaustion. Think about all the strategy that involves keeping the enemy on high alert without sleep. Night raids, hit and run tactics, fear mongering.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:18 PM
2

Who are you referring to as worth convincing?
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:13 PM
3

You keep clamouring about changing the game. The other guy points out you cannot change the game. You agree that the game is rigged and you have no argument. Then you loop back to 'don't hurt them just change the game'. This is how a shill acts. Keep the rage going while offering no viable way to stop it.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:09 PM
1

which then women completely misunderstand as men mocking them since stepping up to us means caring better about your responsibilities which means that you also have to take best care of yourself in order to stay productive. This is interesting. How exactly does somebody take better care of their responsibilities? Typically with time or resources. They want to do [this] but they go to work instead or they do something else they'd rather not be doing. We call that - sacrifice. I sacrifice my leisu…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:50 PM
1

Are you certain that the feminists, who you accknowledge (-> link in the side bar) to be also pro men's rights but who you think should accknowledge that they created the problem which they also want to fix but consider an effect of patriarchical structures, are really your enemies in this? ... This is a train wreck of a question designed to confuse the subject. Rephrase and try again. i'd say that it's most likely to be heavily flawed. If the Duluth model pushed into legislation by feminists is…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:49 PM
1

This is what "patriarchy" actually means for men: You're being trained to become warriors willing to go into your death at the behest of a woman who repays you with sexual favours. Actually, the draft takes care of that. Men can be forced to serve under threat of being guilty of treason if they refuse. Women are also... wait, women are not forced to sign up force the draft. How odd. That must mean you are out there every day protesting to make it mandatory for women to register for the draft? An…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:48 PM
1

We're not trying to eliminate all guys like this poor dude who was just having a discussion with his wife. If you find it ok to eliminate some men based on your criteria, that means it's ok to eliminate certain women based on other criteria? Are you ok with that? We are trying to stop the guy who molested your sister (which she never told you about because she was afraid you'd ruin your life by killing him) from doing it again and again. Or how about your wife/girlfriend's abusive ex-partner? Is…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:47 PM
1

And saying that isn't the same as saying that any of you guys in this sub is a rapist or in any other way not a decent human being! Yet you continue to generalize all masculinity as toxic. You can't say masculinity is toxic then tell the same men they aren't toxic. That makes no sense. Probably, you're actually treating women as equals and from that perspective, you just find it extremely unfair that feminists keep bashing on toxic men. Feminists do bash men. This is true. They do not reserve th…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:46 PM
1

And about #metoo: Every(!) woman has their own story like this, False. This is nothing more than feminist propaganda. Most of my friends have at some point of their lives been sexually abused or even raped Instead of surrounding yourself exclusively with survivors of assault so you can experience confirmation bias, you could find some friends who have not been assaulted. This way your worldview would not be out of balance. That's what we call "toxic masculinity": Pretending the problem doesn't e…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:45 PM
2

I think you're misunderstanding the term "toxic masculinity" Toxic masculinity is not a real thing. Some people behave poorly. Their behavior can be categorized as toxic. Applying the adjective 'toxic' to the set of characteristics that apply to men, 'masculinity', is to say that all of those characteristics are toxic. Now, many feminists will deny this truth by quickly backtracking with the claim that they aren't saying all masculinity is toxic. However, they will not change the terminology to …
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:44 PM
7

There are some errors in your post. According to your link: 1932 – The National Recovery Act forbids more than one family member from holding a government job, resulting in many women losing their jobs. This is not within 20 years of WW 2. This was prior to the war and was in response to the Great Depression. Also, the date is wrong. It was enacted in 1933. According to your link the NRA supposedly restricts a family to one government job. It does not specifically target women. In fact, it does …
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:16 AM
11

Ok. Who saw them as inferior?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:28 PM
12

How did you see them as inferior?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:12 PM
2

You raise a good question so I thought I would investigate. Turns out Google does doodle about war. Google Doodle celebrates first female war photojournalist to report from the frontline https://www.google.com/amp/s/mashable.com/article/google-doodle-gerda-taro.amp If they can celebrate a woman journalist who died while reporting on a war, why will they not celebrate the actual soldiers that died in the war. ? Hmmmmm.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:31 PM
1

Aww, you build such beautiful strawmen! They are so cute! Back to church you sinner!!
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:54 PM
1

Especially with a package like this lol. Sounds like a case of cock envy. If you are embarrassed by your body, it's ok. You can get past that. It's neat how you think civilized people are so repulsed by an erection. Shouldn't you be in church instead of chatting on Reddit?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:40 PM
2

Ok. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 are anecdotal. They will not be recognized. 3 is false. There is no pink tax. 6 Fear of assault is not unique to women. This is not systemic or cultural. it is a fact of life for all of us. 8 Being catcalled is not unique to women. Being the focus of attention is not unique to women. This is not systemic or cultural. You have not provided any solid evidence of systemic or cultural disadvantages. A disadvantage looks like this - there are no affirmative action quotas for hiring …
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:31 PM
4

What systemic and cultural disadvantages do women experience?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 07:29 PM
4

What rights do men have that women do not?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 07:00 PM
7

Feminism and those who support it are nefarious at best. You claim to support men but you do use some feminist tactics. Trust is earned. You are not entitled to be trusted simply because you say you are trustworthy. If you support men, what actions are you taking to stop the feminist movement and curtail those women who abuse the system and any man that gets in their way?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:21 PM
2

Toxic masculinity is not a thing.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:21 PM
1

Now you have nothing of merit to reply with except ad hominems. You're a joke.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:34 AM
1

but you should refrain from being fueled by sentiments More manipulation from you. I noticed that your arguments are still vague and rhetorical, On the contrary, I've asked very direct questions (that you didn't answer) and pointed you to a plethora of information (that you haven't investigated). constructive discussion Conversations with feminists are not constructive. Or do you assume this is my first dialog with a feminist? Instead of asking a sentimental question that’s begging its answer, M…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:05 PM
1

Why do you forget those things are important?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:37 PM
1

What do you like about it?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:59 PM
1

What rights do men have that women do not?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:57 PM
1

I see that your point is ‘feminists are bad’, which you are definitely free to believe in, but it in no way links to my original comment on ‘creepy pictures in a restroom are not OK according to a feminist’. In your attempt to manipulate you have created a strawman. My statement was, "feminists are well known for poor behavior." Your intentional use of deception further proves the point. Still, you didn’t provide concrete examples of bad behaviors by feminists or in what ways you think the movem…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:59 PM
1

Regardless of the words I use or the way I employ them the message will remain consistent. Feminists are well known for behaving poorly. For each example you can find of when a feminist was not behavior poorly I can give you ten of when they were. Yes I recognize you identify as a feminist. No I do not support or encourage your movement. Feminism is wrong on every level. If you truly seek liberation the first step will be to acknowledge that feminist theory is a lie. Liberate yourself from the c…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:21 AM
1

You have proven my point. You designed a premise based on a supposition and used it to create an assumption of my deductive reasoning. You complain about generalizing just moments before you ask a question that you formulated to generalize the behavior of feminists as criminal while positing that I authored your nonsense. All while over inflating your ego by telling yourself this is a stronger premise. I applaud your coup de gras; when you blunder another assumption about the education level of …
/r/MensRights02/06/19 11:37 AM
1

Foh shizzle my nizzle!
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:04 AM
1

Foh? Is that slang for something? Like, foh real, whach yo want? lol
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:28 AM
1

And another would be hero come to save the day. You boys crawl out the woodwork.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:18 AM
0

lolol!! Epic fail. Thanks for playing!
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:38 AM
1

And how do you propose to stop this war on men? By sitting around telling other men not to do certain things?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 10:25 PM
2

Yes Captain Obvious. And I wondered why he wasn't calling her out as does seem to be the standard here. Classic white knight behavior.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:58 PM
3

Correct. And my point is that the reprimand is one sided, or gender specific. You boys are all about calling each other out, until somebody calls you out. It's ok to call out boy #1 for something but it's not ok to call out the boy for calling out something unequally. Some really fancy rules you got here in your club.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:38 PM
1

Oh look, somebody else wants to join in the fun.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:35 PM
1

Aww, still showing off your ride behavior. You'll be ok.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:37 PM
2

lol! The I'm better than you defense.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:04 PM
1

Just wanted to clarify that you won't say anything about a woman acting poorly, only a man. Thanks!
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:49 PM
2

Yes, I understand the point you are making. I'm asking about who you are trying to enforce it on. You are quick to reprimand a man reacting badly to a woman acting badly. Q: What is the root cause of this situation? A: Two people acting badly. Q: Are you reprimanding both of them? A: No, just the man. Q: Why only the man?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:41 PM
0

Ah yes. Narcissism at its finest. You believe your opinion is fact. You insert yourself into an ongoing conversation then believe you "started" it. Thanks for the laughs!
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:36 PM
-1

lolol! Also, it doesn't come across like you believe your first statement when you use the words it doesn't come across. So you are saying you don't believe what you just said about me not believing what I said. lolol!
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:15 PM
-1

You didn't deny that you were Actually I did. I pointed out that your opinion of me is aggressive and condescending. Perhaps you are under the impression that your opinions are facts. Psst, your opinions are not facts. I never equated being held accountable to being treated horribly Good. Now that we have cleared that up you can grab a drink and I'll go back to the conversation I was having with somebody else before you interrupted. Thanks!
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:13 PM
4

What I see happening is you reprimanding a man for acting poorly. What I don't see happening is you reprimanding the woman for acting poorly. Why is that?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:07 PM
1

Your comment seems needlessly aggressive and condescending. This is your opinion. It doesn't come across like you fully believe your own opinion when you use the word seems. I don't even know what point you're trying to make. But you comprehend it well enough to form a rebuttal: seeing a woman act horribly doesn't mean we should treat all women horribly. I have not advocated for treating anybody horribly. Herein lies the problem: No one is talking about enforcing this on women I am calling for e…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:37 PM
9

Let's explore your idea. Correct me if I'm wrong. You have two basic points: You want men to act like adults Two wrongs don't make a right When are you going to start enforcing this on women? How do you plan on it actually working?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:12 PM
1

Calling you out on your bullshit is not harassment.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:30 PM
1

Because you have no game. You're busted. Now scurry off.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:59 PM
1

That's you best defense? That's it?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:45 PM
1

I like how you didn't answer regarding your approval or not. You thought you'd be clever with that avoidance. If you laughed, why hide it? If you didn't, why so many words to convince the crowd?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:04 PM
2

If you weren't looking at my crotch you wouldn't see any morning wood. There is no sign posted advertising my morning wood. No neon blinking lights. No sound bytes inviting you to peek. Why are you looking at my crotch?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:01 PM
2

My genitals are none of your concern lol! Why are you staring at my crotch? You try an ad hominem because you can't think of a valid argument against having natural body functions. And I'm the one who's 12? lolol
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:02 AM
2

Yeah but we're talking about a standard function. So you've accepted that erections are a natural function but you want to shame men for having them. And you really expect to be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 10:41 AM
3

Ah yes, shame people for their natural biological processes. This is how we succeed as a civilization right? What should we do with people who have unsightly acne? Demand they cover their face until it magically goes away? And we can't forget grotesquely disfigured individuals. Maybe we should force them to stay away from public places?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:18 AM
3

Because feminists are well known for poor behavior.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:11 AM
7

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:01 AM
5

Normal, rational feminists don't Exist.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:57 AM
3

Not only do you believe you are the one to decide what issues can be discussed, you also believe you are a spokesman for the vast majority of people. How much more of your narcissism will you grace us with?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:39 AM
8

I know it's difficult when your attempt to control others is rebuked. But you'll get over it.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 11:33 PM
10

Because only you get to decide what issues men are allowed to have. Nice approach. Reminds me of a certain group of people. coughcoughfeministcoughcough
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:18 PM
0

Discrimination is not a solution. But hey, you have fun with your fingers in your ears copy pasta! lol
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:57 PM
0

Huh you ignored everything again. Imagine that, somebody ignoring your bullshit in their search for answers. If the solutions make the people involved happy and elliminated the problem, then it's a good solution. Here you have a solution that women are happy with. After reading these statement I have become fully aware of your position. You claim that discrimination is not the answer then you go on to approve of it if it makes women happy. Let's see if your logic pans out. Many people are tired …
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:46 PM
1

Trigger Warning:. Question coming. If sexual harassment happens to everyone and discrimination isn't the answer. What is the solution?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:25 PM
28

First it is meant as a joke. Do you approve of this humor?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:22 PM
0

I'm looking at the big picture. You want to play identity politics. I ask straight forward questions to understand your position better. You melt down. Is this the best you've got?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:15 PM
0

Calm down? Do my straight forward questions scare you?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:11 PM
1

Do you believe this situation only happens to one group of people? Do you believe discrimination against every other group is the answer?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:09 PM
4

That's the best you got? You complain about toxic behavior then show off your own brand of it. Looks like you've proven yourself right, you are the asshole.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:06 AM
2

You can rationalize whatever bullshit you want. Toxic masculinity is not a thing. Your attempt to blame and shame men will not work.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 11:06 PM
2

Switch tasking. lol
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:57 PM
4

No. That's being an asshole. People exhibit bad behaviors. Stop with the identity politics already.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:49 PM
2

No they don't. There are toxic behaviors but toxic masculinity / femininity is not a thing.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:59 PM
1

hands you a cup of the Kool aid Here you go. Everything will make sense soon.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:58 PM
2

The downward spiral continues I see. Hmm. How bad will it get before you crash and burn?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:37 PM
2

In other words you have no actual answer so you try to wiggle out of the situation with ad hominem while your unsubstantiated claim goes down the drain. Tuck and run.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:26 PM
2

What are these negative indirect consequences of false rape accusations that supposedly affect real rape victims?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:17 PM
1

Is it unreasonable to doubt an accusation until it is proven true?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:00 PM
1

Is it reasonable to say you do not subscribe to the idea of innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:49 PM
11

Ah yes, another attempt to shame and blame men.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:38 PM
0

The purpose of government is not to direct the private affairs of citizens. Citizens are supposed to be taking personal responsibility for their decisions. I am not responsible for your poor decisions. You are.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:23 PM
0

That's right. Abortion is killing the child.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:46 AM
3

That means you, u/MistaMayfair, are to be held personally responsible for every child on the planet. How much of your earnings are you contributing to taking care of all your children?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:42 AM
0

Your solution is to protect only one group while you leave everybody else to suffer. Can you see why that is a bad idea?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:55 PM
1

How will you know the difference between a genuine compliment and a lie?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:45 PM
5

Will you list the rights that women do not have for which these good feminists are supposedly fighting for?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter