TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OnlyTheRealAdvice Archive

View 14 posts and 665 comments by OnlyTheRealAdvice on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
226

HypocrisyOnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:03 AM
221

Activism/SupportOnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:26 AM
189

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW01/10/18 08:45 PM
126

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW21/09/18 03:32 AM
122

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:02 AM
82

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW22/08/18 04:41 AM
74

Activism/SupportOnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:48 PM
36

SocEngOnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW15/02/19 05:32 PM
24

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW15/02/19 11:00 AM
24

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:00 PM
9

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:26 PM
7

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW28/03/18 07:10 PM
7

Social IssuesOnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MensRights31/01/19 02:51 PM
5

OnlyTheRealAdvice/r/MGTOW15/01/19 09:26 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No one is asking for her career to be ruined. She should at a minimum have her social media accounts banned though like is happening to these fine gentlemen.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:42 AM
1

Diversity of ideas has value. Diversity of skin, hair color, gender, etc, does not have value. There should never be discrimination against people of those attributes. And, when you give preferential treatment to one group because of those physical attributes then you are discriminating.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:00 PM
1

Yeah, this guy is on some delicious drugs or something. Considering every single person is both working full time and is a "stay at home" person who must cook, clean, wash, etc. I have no idea how people think managing a household is a full time job. It is at best a 2 hour a week job.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:33 AM
1

But if we must look broader than a city, then why not look broader than the country? Whites are a minority in the world.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:59 PM
1

But men's role is to die for women. They are disposable. How can you expect women to risk their own body?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:07 AM
2

Agreed. I don't care how many tears there are I will not help at all. My life is too valuable. Her life is not valuable enough as she is part of an oppressor class. That strong independent woman can figure it out on her own. I do find it weird that every time a woman is in trouble she blames men if one did not step up to solve the problem. Yet at the same time she hates men for being men. Incredible. No more. You are on your own.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:55 AM
1

Advertisers are not paid by view. They never have been, really. What they do is report earnings on a per-view basis, which is why people get confused.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:28 PM
3

Thirsty men who in their thirst do the bidding of women? Who really has the power? Think on it for a while.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 06:44 AM
1

Change the world for the better. Do something great. Go out with a bang and not a wimper. Don't give up.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 04:04 AM
2

I tell every guy I know.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 04:03 AM
6

The issue is if a man went on the plane they the women would claim sexual harassment. Yet when a woman does this if it makes someone uncomfortable the women again claim sexual harassment. Every road leads to sexual harassment with these cunts.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 04:02 AM
3

Being indifferent is for you. I am not trying to defend women. Hate them if you want. But, it takes energy from you to hate. Never trust them. Never hire them. Don't interact with them. But whenever you hate them you take focus away from YOU and you give it to THEM. It is better to forget they even exist and focus on you.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 04:00 AM
2

Women don't produce. They only consume what men produce on a whole. You see this in the New Zealand tax study where every woman cost society about $100k over her lifetime on average. And, you see this in studies on tribal societies on calorie production versus calorie consumption. The biological strategy of women is to manipulate men to gain resources. Their strategy has never and will never will be to actually create things, on average.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:49 PM
4

No reason to invent new laws on male bodies in order to protest men wanting to control women's bodies. Ways the government already controls male bodies: By allowing and endorsing circumcision The draft. Enough said Alimony / child support force men to work longer hours.... with their bodies Drug laws. Control what men can put in their bodies. The truth is no one has a right to their own body. The only time society tries to pretend it does is when women want to avoid responsibility of motherhood.
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 02:19 AM
5

It has nothing to do with revenge. It has to do with creating allies. The more people affected, especially women, the more who will fight to end it.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:48 PM
1

It's your white knighting that ensures it continues. Never make it painful for the oppressor is the way to get them to stop oppressing? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:50 PM
1

Why can you force a man to pay child support, but you can't force a woman to carry a baby to term? Both of them require specific actions of a person's body. 99% of men make money to pay that child support via their body.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:43 AM
3

There is no evidence staying single results in less happiness. In fact, I believe recent well-done studies indicate single people are slightly happier and if you include "divorced" under "marriage" like it should be because divorced can only spawn from a marriage, then singles are much happier. Previous studies that did this misled people. What they did is included "divorced" people into the category of "single", which makes no sense. "divorced" is a consequence of marriage not being single. So,…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:59 PM
1

Never miss an opportunity to peacock in front of the camera to display value to potential chads!
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:48 PM
10

Without a wife and kids you would generally have far more friends.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:47 PM
7

It is a lottery. No one marries someone who they think will make them miserable. People are a horrible judge of character and people change during their life. The result is EVERYONE chooses someone who they think is perfect for them. The vast majority will lose at that game and become miserable. The only solution is to not play it. Far higher average happiness.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:46 PM
11

Mental gymnastics. People are very good at creating exceptions in their mind for groups they favor.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:50 PM
1

If there is any truth to it my guess is they looked at wages paid to men and women and found a discrepancy. As a result, they are failing to give mens raises until this discrepancy is gone.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:51 PM
4

You are a developer. Jobs are a dime a dozen. Leave this company. There is no future. Most people get pay increases by CHANGING JOBS. Your strategy should ALWAYS be to change drops. That is how you make more money.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:50 PM
1

The point is when life begins is NOT a scientific question. Science cannot answer it. Science can answer when a heart beats. Or when someone has functional nerves. It CANNOT and is not equipped to answer when life begins. That is a PHILOSOPHICAL question. Only philosophy can answer when life begins. As a result, there is no black and white answer. For many people, it begins at DNA differentiation (conception). For others it is the heart beat. For others it is feeling pain. Hell, some people don'…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:29 PM
1

You are wrong. There are many examples where people get coerced into "medical procedures". A very common would be to perform blood alcohol tests and other drug tests. Many of them require the direct penetration of the skin to perform. And, if you refuse, BIG TROUBLE! Hell, going through security at an airport requires penetration of the skin with x-rays. No consultation about by bodily autonomy there! There are cases of prisoners who are being forced to take medication as part of their "rehabili…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:26 PM
1

We also consider people with no heart beats dead. In fact, that is the far most common measure of death all throughout history.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:19 PM
1

Men have no bodily autonomy for the draft. No bodily autonomy for circumcision as a baby. No bodily autonomy to ingest any drugs they so desire. No bodily autonomy to decide how much production their body should perform as they are obgliated to minimum production levels to meet child support / alimony payments. Bodily autonomy does not exist. Now, let's pretend we actually did have "bodily autonomy". Strangely enough, the ONE case where bodily autonomy should be overridden is probably in saving …
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:15 PM
8

We have no right to bodily autonomy. I do not know why people like you keep talking about this crap. MEN have no body autonomy. Here are places where your body is not yours: Heard of the draft? That is the state telling you what you will do with your body. MEN have no autonomy here. Heard of drugs? That is the state telling you what you can put in your body. There is no autonomy here. Heard of child support / alimony? That is the state tell you how much production your body must produce in order…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:19 PM
7

Please care. That is NOT your money. That is your kids money. So if you fail to sue the mother, then you are ROBBING YOUR CHILDREN. You have taken the goal of acting on their behalf. Please act on their behalf and don't white knight and as a result allow people to steal money from your kids. You can put that money in a college fund.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:15 PM
1

Exactly. The guy might be a CEO if he didn't dedicate time to his relationship. So now he is only an office paper pusher. Should the women be forced to compensate him for any potential theoretical costs the relationships cost him?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:15 PM
4

It's really simple though. Marriage is a CONTRACT. Prior to getting married parties should be required by law to delineate what happens in a divorce. Including whether or not there will be alimony. That way no one "gave up their career" without understanding any risks associated with that choice.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:14 PM
28

Men have been brainwashed from the moment they exited the womb. They were taught with disney and super hero movies, etc, that a mans' value is being sacrificial and disposable. The result is it never occurs to men to ask something for themselves.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 06:17 PM
2

This is an ultimate betrayal. I cannot imagine what would go through my mind if I was this guy. Luckily, I am mgtow, so never have or ever will be in a situation like this. I am not sure what this girl thought though. She leads him on for 4 years hyping up first-sex as some gift to him. Then, she gives it to some other random dude and thus depriving him of first-sex, which she led him to believe was super sacred and important. Did she really think she could escape it and get to keep this dude?
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 03:34 PM
6

Women are psychopaths. We have seen from modern day tax studies to calorie production / consumption in tribal societies that women are takers not producers. It takes a lack of empathy to take from another for ones own benefit and as a result women are born without any empathy.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 02:17 PM
2

So 10 black men have less value than 1 white woman? What a world.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:09 PM
3

It would be worse for society if she does not get harmed. Imagine if she encouraged 100 other people to go who do get harmed as a result. In a way, her sacrifice could save countless other lives.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 01:52 AM
1

Can you sue?
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 01:50 AM
7

Feminism is not about fairness. It's about supremacy.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 09:28 PM
1

The problem is the non-discriminatory solutions results in more men being hired. That is the opposite of the outcome feminists want.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:46 PM
12

Well, it's one of those trick scenerios. A woman would never be with a man who makes less. Similarly, a woman never asks out a man thus the "he who invites pays" logic. All the rules are created to benefit them and their hypergamy
/r/MGTOW04/03/19 06:44 AM
3

Very true. However, that is better than paying both for a wife AND a fat slutty single mother. As more men go MGTOW they will likely vote for any politician who stops the subsidies to women too. So, in time, the subsidies could be reduced. Also, many, many MGTOW men try NOT to be net-tax payers. Don't feed the beast that bites you.
/r/MGTOW04/03/19 06:41 AM
1

Not just Gillete. All of P&G: https://us.pg.com/brands/ This company is a snake. It needs to be tramped underfoot.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:34 AM
3

Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice.... Nope, never going to happen. You are out of my life P&G. Officially broken up.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:33 AM
3

I am not so easy to buy. If they donated 10 million to men's rights groups in addition to that, then I might reconsider.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:32 AM
4

Gillete India profits are down 9%. The fact they felt compelled to make this updated ad which they believe is less insulting (even though it is insulting) indicates they have felt pressure.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:31 AM
1

The first ad was written by feminist wanting to make men second class citizens. The second ad was written by traditionalists wanting to make men second class citizens. Same ol same ol
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:30 AM
5

What does an apology accomplish? If someone said to you that their life goal is to give you poisoned wine and then you were like "Okay, I am going to make it as hard as possible for you to do that". Realizing their job just got harder they say "Sorry bro, it was just a big joke. Want to come over to my place next weekend for some wine?" Would you do it? An apology means nothing. Only being supplanted by competitors and slowly dying has meaning. Never buy P&G products.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:29 AM
5

It's actually really easy. I replaced about 7 of their products in my household. Not only did I get cheaper alternatives, but many are healthier too. P&G sells shit products desiigned for industrial sales where they fill it full of chemical soups to make it shelf-stable for 10 years. It finally motivated me to buy more natural locally made products where possible.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:27 AM
2

Maybe a one-off mistake. This is not P&G's first go at this. All their brands have man-hating slants. Look at their vicks commercials which routinely show superhero women and sick baby men.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:25 AM
5

I will take the collapse of P&G with it being supplanted by less man-hating companies as an apology. Anything short of that is too little. I will never buy P&G again no matter how much they try to kiss my ass for profits.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:25 AM
12

They already double downed on their ad. Any apology would be fake and made for profits. Don't fall for it. The only "apology" that would bring justice is Gillete and P&G dying and new companies taking their place. Boycott now and forever. There is nothing they can do to win me back. Maybe if they donated 10 million+ annualy to men right's groups I would reconsider, so long as no one else matched them.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:23 AM
1

That is why the empathy is important. Once men have their needs met via sex bots and artificial wombs they will spend less time interacting or caring about women. Their empathy and out-group bias towards women will decrease.
/r/MGTOW04/03/19 04:59 AM
2

She can get a JOB. Why are tax payers paying for her?
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:48 AM
4

Exactly. Women cannot be separated by from the context they exist. Given society gives them the power to destroy your life there is no amount of decency that can compensate for that. The only solution is going your own way.
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:45 AM
2

You think it's any better for western guys? It's not. Sure, they can go to Thailand and get matched with thai whores. What did they gain? A gold digger and some STDs? This should just red pill you. This was always the way of the world. Now you can see it and not get trapped by it. Focus on you. Women are not worth the effort. Even the "family-values old way" you fantasize about was a system where you provided everything and got little in return. You have always been disposable by society.
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:42 AM
2

Check all your routine purchases for products on this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Procter_%26_Gamble_brands If you buy detergent, shampoo, deodorant, etc, from these brands then change them. Double bonus is that alternative products are oftentimes cheaper and higher quality.
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:35 AM
8

80% of women marry-up. The other 20% marry guys they expect will be making more in the future. What more evidence do you need?
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:18 AM
7

I have been ghosting for 15 years. Never gets old
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:17 AM
16

Never thought of it that way, but that is exactly what it is.
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 05:14 AM
1

Men create. Women destroy
/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:44 AM
1

They already have a term for this. It is called "stealthing". Like most things it only applies to the almost-never-happens crime of a guy pretending he is wearing a condom when he is actually not and impregnating a girl. It's use seems to completely exclude the much more common case of women lying about being on birth control.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 02:50 AM
1

That's not good enough. Never believe someone who apologizes only because they are losing money. P&G deserves to fail as a company. The warning is for the next company.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:20 PM
1

That would be for the civil rights agencies.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:16 PM
1

No man should fight. I would never fight for this gynocentric society.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:10 PM
1

So that means men need to quit signing up. Then, if the gov takes action against any man, that is when when you sue.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:09 PM
1

Women outnumber men. Especially voting age women. So, any makeup of the congress is women's fault. Is she anti-democratic? Does she want to take away the choice of women to vote for men?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:06 PM
1

No one marries a bad woman. When will you guys get that through your head? EVERY guy who marries is marrying his personal unicorn. The point is humans are a very bad judge of character. This is proven by the divorce rate. It matters not if there are good women out there if you lack the ability to make the judgment call.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:34 AM
1

NO. You don't understand. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a woman to offer you a good relationship because the laws do not allow her too. No matter how great she is the laws make you the loser.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:32 AM
1

And there was clear motive. She was trying to get life insurance money!
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:32 AM
3

When divorce?
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 10:37 PM
2

Women are a co-evolved parasite. When you think of them in this context it all makes sense. I know technically they are not, but that mental imagery puts a lot of the puzzle pieces together.
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 10:36 PM
4

Why isn't she considered an enemy combatant and jailed?
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 10:32 PM
3

Exactly. Women cannot bond in sisterhood because they start competing with each other. As a result and given that social sciences are domianted by female thought, they projected their own attributes onto men. You see this even today where women rate other women bosses and coworkers as worse than men.
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 10:31 PM
2

And, it's not just state-level. Federal SBA loans, housing loans, and more.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:23 PM
1

Yes, but asians are still benefited in actual law. Where they hurt equally as with whites is in policy of a few public and private universities. As far as law is concerned they are still a privileged class that gets special access to gov contracts, loan guarantees, and other special perks thanks t the color of their skin.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:22 PM
1

Just FYI when I am talking about ancient tribes I am referring to pre-agricultural. Way before plato. Way before the agricultural induced social arrangements that developed.
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 02:09 AM
96

What's always interesting is that white people are the only group provably systemically oppressed in the US via affirmative action, federal grants, federally subsidized SBA loans, and more.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:03 AM
1

Ummm, except you are the one living a non-factual delusion and what I said was based in fact. Let's try to keep this sub focused on facts. To do otherwise is sexist.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:09 AM
1

https://www.inc.com/rebekah-iliff/what-women-owned-business-wants-in-2019.html The report further explains the significance of this upward trend, but concludes that while female-owned businesses are certainly on the rise, they only account for 8 percent of the total private sector workforce and contribute 4.3 percent of total revenue. It looks like I was a little too generous in my claim. That does not even exclude all the fake woman ran businesses that are really ran by the husband or father, b…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:06 AM
13

Yeah, that guy is such a quitter. He just didn't succeed this time. He should spend the next 6 months working 3 jobs to do an even more elaborate proposal. Maybe this time it will be to her liking /s
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 06:19 AM
1

Not really. Maybe 10% of businesses are legit women-run
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:06 AM
1

Just to quibble, almost all of these "women-run" businesses are actually male run. Fact is women just don't run businesses. What a woman can do is have a husband or boyfriend put them in a token CEO role to get some government contracts (which are almost impossible to get if you aren't black or a woman) and free-marketing.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:23 AM
5

The most ironic one I think is the comment about not needing to serve the draft until they have full rights to their own body. Even though 1) they do have full rights 2) men have never had full rights to their own body and the draft itself is evidence of this.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:21 AM
5

How it will really happen is all the comfy and safe jobs will go to women. This will just free up more men to fight in the front lines and die. In fact, in the world wars they specifically had advertisement "Women, join the military and free a man for the front lines" I am not sure a draft would even work today. I think they would get more people that subordinated the system than actually helped. I know that if I was drafted I would cost the military far more than I would benefit them because I …
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:20 AM
1

A sub on reddit does not represent a "movement" (mgtow is not a movement)
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:13 AM
3

Exactly. Stop paying her. It won't count and it will just give her motivation to try and delay getting a formal court hearing. Stop paying all support and use that as motivation to get it resolved quickly via the courts.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:03 AM
4

Her logic is 100% correct. It is sexist against men and she herself is proof of that so she can say it with 100% accuracy.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:00 AM
1

No, you see the rapist didn't profit. The child support goes to the child who is under the guardianship of the rapist, so no profit for the rapists the money is all the childs. I know what you are thinking, well at least ensure the money actually goes to the child and isn't just being spent on a boob job by the rapist. Well, you see that would violate the privacy of the rapist, so no good! The money is for the child's interest, but we cannot verify it goes to the child because that would violate…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:42 PM
1

There is a difference between shares rates of news articles between men and women. Women definitely share more news. What I don't know is if they share more positive or negative news. Same for guys. It could be that women share more positive news and men share more negative news. If that is true, then it would explain why all news is pro-female supremacy. Both men and women would share it for different reasons.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:35 PM
2

He is jewish so from his viewpoint he is not technically "white". As a result, he might exclude himself from that group even if no one else does.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:23 PM
2

I did too. I will contribute as little as possible to this society until I am treated like a human.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:22 PM
1

Willing means they are no more forced into than anyone else who works a job. As a society that is what we call willing. Someone who doped themselves up and now feels a need to make a lot of money is not enslaved by whatever job they chose to make the money. If someone gets a huge mortgage and then works two jobs to pay it off they are also doing that job willingly. I am sorry, the opposite of not doing a job willingly means they are doing it unwillingly. We call that slavery. I am not willing to…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:18 PM
1

Btw that definition almost no one works willingly. What about the men who trade their body in hard physical labor? No one would willingly do that if your definition is "has no other choice for that level of pay". There are tons of womens shelters, womens welfare programs, womens charities, and tons of jobs. A woman who is prostituting is doing it because she made a choice to. I am excluding the very, very small minority that are being forced into it.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:48 PM
1

You can ban sex robots. These are made in fairly large factories. It is very easy to identify and shut them down. It is not like prostitution which is decentralized. One factory provides bots for the whole country. Literally, just send 1 police officer to bar the door and POOF the sex bots are gone.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:16 AM
1

What happened to my body my rights? And, kind of interesting because the big boogeyman "sex trafficking" (which is 99% of the time a woman willingly wanting to be a prostitute) would actually be lessened if sex bots were legal. Now demand for women in brothels decreases. You would think it would be a good thing. But, many feminist are anti-prostitution. Truth is they just want to control male access to sexual outlets. They want men desperate enough they sign over their assets to women and the st…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:12 AM
2

Exactly. Traditionalism (no masturbation, no casual sex, etc) and feminism are the same in this regard. Both seek to control male sexuality and enslave them. Harvest them for the profits of women and the few elite men.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:10 AM
7

They need to ban the smut shit women read. Like 50 shades of grey. This normalizes the idea that men are wallets.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:06 AM
3

I agree. Not just proctor and gamble but products from ALL conglomerates cause disease. It is just the nature of the market. They became conglomerates by creating products that stay on the shelf longer (stabilizing chemicals, foods, etc). This enables them to have 1 or 2 central factories where they can have economies of scale and can ship to the whole world. And it reduces waste due to goods perishing on the shelf. It just so happens those same chemicals that enable the products to be shelf-sta…
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 11:14 AM
1

"care for whatever around them" hahahahahwhaahahah That was funny stuff and completely false. Women care for example 1 thing: themselves Women's problem is not they are so full of care. That is a line of bullshit.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:50 AM
5

Remember your life is valuable. If your life is ever in danger desert your post. Nothing back home is worth fighting for. You would be fighting for the enslavement of yourself and other men. Not worth it. Collect the paycheck and that's it.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:42 AM
2

Yeah, anyone with a brain wouldn't pay. And, if the marriage was like 90% the guy probably thought it was better than being divorce raped and having his kids stolen from him. It's a tragedy, but the unjust laws make people have to think like this which no one should be required to think like that due to unjust laws.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:41 AM
1

Exactly. The solution is obviously to auction off the parking spaces. Why should a man pay in his time and additional walking just because women feel less safe? If they do feel less safe, then they can purchase the right to park there in a fair auction. After all, some guys might feel unsafe too and deserve to be parking closer. Let the market decide.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:37 AM
1

Guy quits using a condom because "you can't get pregnant twice, haha" and then BAM she gets pregnant, but this time for real. The odd part will be when she is pregnant for 11 months.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:32 AM
5

Not just Gillete. The parent company Proctor and Gamble has a history of anti-male advertisement across all product lines such as Gillete, Tide, Vicks, etc.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:26 AM
3

I would never buy anything from Proctor & Gamble even with a retraction. If they stop all gynocentric advertisement for the next 5 years, then I might re-consider in 5 years time.
/r/MGTOW20/02/19 09:23 AM
3

The issue is the double standard. Men cannot "shame" or "judge" or even have a "standard" about anything that relates to women. Cannot fat shame. Cannot hate or like big asses or tiny tits or anything. Men must accept every permutation of a woman no questions asked. Yet, women can fat shame men. Shame their penises, etc. The issue is the double standard.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:46 PM
1

How do you think the men become lazy, careless, and drunken? If you worked 60 hour weeks and all your money went to a woman wouldn't you become lazy and careless? Wouldn't you want to escape the slavery any way you can even if it is alcohol? If society treated me that way and there was not a revolution for me to join up I would probably drink away and do the minimum possible until the revolution sparked too.
/r/MGTOW19/02/19 05:28 AM
1

Yes, italian features would do well there
/r/MGTOW19/02/19 05:26 AM
14

Serious? Who the hell says that? That is definitely women. Only women lack total empathy towards men. Men who do not serve them have no value and might as well be dead. I hope that most mgtow men know that every man is precious. In fact, you share more DNA with a random man than you do your own mother due to the Y chromosome. So, genetically, a random man is more your own family by blood than your mother.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 08:21 AM
4

There needs to be a better check on these judges and prosecutors. A better and more accessible way to remove these judges who are exercising too much discretion especially if they are treating different classes different based on largely identical circumstances. Between prosecuters using prosecutorial discretion to not even prosecute women in the first place and judges giving non-sentences, the system is too unjust. At some point this will inspire a yellow vest type movement among men and those …
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:48 AM
8

Tradconn women are perhaps worse than feminist. They have all the demands of feminist without even the veneer of equality.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 07:41 AM
13

Absolutely, I wish every billboard had such redpill knowledge. Men need to see it in their fast to counteract the decades of propaganda and brainwashing they were subject to.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 05:32 AM
15

I thought it was hilarious that the dudes were basically backing away. They are smart enough and don't think themselves invisible. The women walk up to him like they have some type of shield on.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 05:28 AM
5

It is not about fat shaming. It is about woman shaming. Name one time where you can shame women. Shaming a woman who sleeps around is slut shaming and your an ass if you do it. If you say she is fat you are fat shaming. If you tell her she is wrong about a fact you are shaming and mansplaining. It is about criticizing women being socially unacceptable.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 05:24 AM
1

Depends if they have a job or are still a "dependent"
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:34 AM
1

There is no evidence of rape, so therefore she deserves no sympathy for it. There is evidence she cut off a guys penis. That is inexcusable.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:02 PM
3

If a child does not even have rights to their own life (abortion) then they don't have rights to money, either. There is no greater right than life, so if that right is forfeit all other rights are. The same arguments for abortion can be applied to child payments. "His body his rights". Most men earn money via use of their body. Having an extra burden of child support places extra stress and burden on their body. Not for a measly 9 months. For their entire life.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:00 PM
2

Well, it is pretty simple. If you don't want to give men "financial abortion", then the solution is to require women to pay child support when they abort. They can give it to the affected father or they can just pay an extra "child support" tax to the government. That way both genders are equally "financially responsible" for any sex that results in a child.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:58 PM
3

Men still must provide for the child of a woman until said child graduates university.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:55 PM
2

Old Spice is owned by Proctor and Gamble. The vast majority of their brands (tide, vicks, gilette, etc) are very anti-male. All their brands should be avoided.
/r/MGTOW15/02/19 12:14 PM
4

In Philippines they can execute you too.
/r/MGTOW15/02/19 11:01 AM
4

Well of course. Have you ever wondered how women can spend 75% of all money, but yet make 25% less than men? The difference is made up in government handouts, blue-pill mangina handouts, etc. Women don't actually need a job. A woman with no job will be given free housing, some fat welfare cash, and any extras will be given to her by manginas on tinder who take her out for $100 steaks every weekend.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:10 AM
3

Yes, people look at the bible wrong in the modern day. People try to discredit it due to the absurdity of it's stories. What they don't realize is the stories are not literal. Someone can discredit God all they want. But, they cannot discredit the importance of the documents and stories that people chose to write, spread, and internalize for thousands of years. That is very important. And, there are a lot of red-pill truths in there. Warnings. That were created due to thousands of years of colle…
/r/MGTOW14/02/19 07:05 AM
3

How many men get killed in parking lots? So many it stopped being newsworthy. Yet one broad gets killed and the whole country spends a billion dollars instalilng panic buttons and redoing parking lots. Fucking unbelievable.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 06:46 PM
4

It's malaysia
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 06:44 PM
6

No, that is malaysia
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 06:44 PM
3

There are a lot of female incels. In fact, most feminist are female incels. However, it is not sex they can't get it is relationships with desirable men. And that is what turns them bitter similar to male incels that can't get sex.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:44 PM
8

Agreed. In many respects tradcons are worse than feminism. In fact, some of the most brutal and unfair aspects of society such as different sentencing of men / women criminals and different prosecution, etc, are all products of the tradcon ideology more than the feminist ideology. Even prior to feminism tradcons did not agree with punishing women. For a large part of history any crime committed by a woman fell on the shoulders of whatever man was keeping her. Tradcons do not believe women have a…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:40 PM
2

When she leaves him he should fight with all he has to get alimony from her. Equal rights and all.
/r/MGTOW12/02/19 08:06 AM
5

Women going their own way doesn't exist. The closest version of it would be feminism. Which is basically women demanding resources from men while providing nothing in return. There was even a WGTOW subreddit which basically devolved into women scheming ways to get money from government (paid for by men) or get things directly from men so they can "go their own way".
/r/MGTOW12/02/19 08:03 AM
4

It's not fine in theory. This guy will be raped for child support in 3 years.
/r/MGTOW12/02/19 08:02 AM
1

They are false because voluntary sex is not rape. At most it could be classified as a broken contract. Let me ask you, when the woman fails to cook dinner 7 nights a week post-marriage, something many of them promised, is the indian man considered "raped"? Of course not.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:19 AM
1

It's not really what you think. According to "tantan" which is the "tinder" equivalent in asia I was one of the most popular guys in Manila with something like 3000 likes in the span of a month. You think, damn new girl every night, right? Wrong. Most of the girls want to be taken out. They have kids. They are covert prostitutes. They are in-the-open prostitutes. They are long-con prostitutes (they want marriage and a ring). They just look funny and unhealthy or something I can't put my finger o…
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 07:49 PM
2

What bulls eye? I have been vocally mgtow for a long time. I definitely don't say mgtow as no one knows what that is. But, I always warn guys about women, tell everyone no marriage and no kids, etc. Even talking to women about it most actually "get it" and agree there isn't really much in it for men. No one has ever attacked me as a result.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 07:45 PM
1

Because most people don't suspect and they are not unsure. That is the nature of fraud and how it works. One person tricking another. So, at a minimum, any child support order needs to be accompanied with a paternity test whether there is suspicion or not.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:19 PM
2

Why not make the judge pay? He probably makes more money than the guy. For the "better of the kid" right. Or hell, why not bill gates? He could pay for lots of kids.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:12 PM
8

For good measure get a notarized statement of her stating she understands you are not married and will never marry. A marriage ceremony can easily be viewed as a marriage in-fact in states with common law marriages. Your state doesn't have common law marriage? Well guess what it could change any time over the next 40 years and then bam you have a common law marriage.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:11 PM
17

Any child support order should require paternity test and if not the father, then no paying unless they already knew and agreed to adopt the kid. At a minimum that should be the case.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:09 PM
5

You can download browser extensions or utilize Tor to make your fingerprint not so unique or always changing.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:08 PM
2

Social engineering cannot change the genetic fact. But, it can change the outcomes. Helping to ensure all women get the same fruits that the elite few men get. And, helping to ensure that the bulk of men continue to be farmed for labor or resources to support the elite men and women.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 09:14 AM
1

What exactly is her complaint? She wants someone seat?
/r/MensRights10/02/19 05:05 PM
1

Yes, a country that special transportation just for women without equal separate transportation just for me is a country where women are the lowest of the low bwhahahaha. Do people buy this shit? Sounds like a lot of female privilege to me.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 05:01 PM
1

Gynocentric judges bend over backwards to justify any bad excuse for women. Even so far as making male rape victims pay child support to their female rapists (who get custody despite being rapists). In the case of sperm judges have ruled it is a "gift". And therefore a woman can do with it what she wants. It is kind of strange because no one asked the guy what conditions he put on that "gift". You hand someone your iphone to hold for you for a second they can't run off with it and the judge woul…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:57 PM
5

Yeah, looks like the majority of the problem is people of color. They are all blue!
/r/MGTOW07/02/19 09:55 AM
1

Even more men have no symptoms of those diseases
/r/MensRights07/02/19 09:52 AM
1

There is a reason they are single.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 07:01 AM
3

females naturally utilize a combined reproductive/resource-acquisition strategy This is really the key. Every time you give women resources she reduces her reproduction. A woman's instinct to reproduce is resource-driven. It is meant to capture a male's resources and the resources of her future kids. Modern society short-circutis this as the state steals money from men and redistributes it to women without a need for women to use reproduction as a way to imprison a man. The end-result is that wo…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:59 AM
1

Btw, an Argentine man recently changed his gender so that he can retire 5 years earlier. Imagine that! Change your gender and enjoy 5 more years of your life. I have not had sufficient need to change my gender yet, but if my country gave me 5 more years free retirement for filing paperwork I would do it in a second. Any man who doesn't is an idiot and is perpetuating the problem. The more people who do it demonstrates the ridiculousness of the inequality and the trans movement in general. Kills …
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:25 PM
1

It depends on each country and state. For example, Lauren Southern is famous for becoming a man (known as the hottest man in the world). She documented it on youtube. It took about a day. That is in canada. You can see the process in California here: https://www.courts.ca.gov/25798.htm Keep in mind, just to change your license / etc/ does not even require this step. That is just checking a check box! Due to all the quotas and general sexism / discrimination against men it is probably the most pr…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:16 PM
0

I don't even know what you are talking about. Going "Trans" does not require any biological changes or drugs. All you have to do is file a paper stating that you feel you are a different sex. No one even has to know that you changed. Just change your license and your done. In all honesty, implying that a transwoman would need to go on hormone blockers to be trans is really quite discriminatory. A transwoman can have high testosterone, a mustache and beard, love to build stuff, etc etc. That is w…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:07 PM
0

I get what you are saying, but the truth is 95% of men don't care about other men. Going "trans" gives those other men a chance to get gov contracts, etc. Its far easier to go "trans" than to convince 95% of men and 100% of women that men matter too.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:34 PM
2

I disagree with this and it should be made illegal to discriminate against a trans woman. Becoming "trans" is one of the best defenses men have against system-wide discrimination. Poof, become a tran, and suddenly they can be on the board of CA company. They can lower their car insurance. They can receive government contracts. They can enter university easier and qualify for scholarships easier.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:04 AM
6

It is far worse. It is impossible for a man to force a woman to be a mother because she can abort. The reverse is not true. So, in that respect, stealthing is the cost of abortion (free in many places). Lying about birth control the damages is 18+ years of slavery. They are not even comparable.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:01 AM
5

According to hillary the women were double victims. They were raped and then their fathers and brothers died. So, they should get double sympathy. Better triple sympathy to be safe. /s
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:31 AM
3

Or raping itself. If even 1 woman rapes, then all must be told not to rape. And, we know women rape a lot especially defenseless boys.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:30 AM
1

She will be high-fived in a female prison.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:28 AM
1

Not just Gillete. All their brands . That is why it is important to boycott all their current and future brands: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands For example, their Vicks commercials frequently show strong and powerful sick women who conquer their sickness with vicks. Yet, their male-led commercials show weak and baby men. All their brands are anti-male. The company is rotten at it's head (P&G)
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:26 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:25 AM
1

Sad. For me, the red pill made me discover my first real friends. The male-bond is a beautiful thing and it is something the feminist and globalist have tried to destroy. Think about how men evolved. Hunting together in a nomadic lifestyle. It required an extremely high degree of cooperation and trust among men. Men are evolved to have deep connections with other men.
/r/MGTOW01/02/19 10:22 AM
1

Do not buy P&G products, ever
/r/MGTOW01/02/19 10:20 AM
1

2% of abortions are done late stage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_termination_of_pregnancy That's not what those words mean. This is my last response to you because you are an idiot, but yes, that is what those words mean: https://www.definitions.net/definition/decent
/r/MensRights31/01/19 07:05 PM
1

I already did prove it. The fact that many states impose no restrictions on abortion past 22 weeks means some have taken place. In the context of murder, any number would be a signficant portion. I am not sure why trying to refocus the conversation away from murder and instead are arguing, wrongly I might add, about trivialities. Are you really in that big of support about murdering innocent children? Or do you think that throwing a fully viable child that is not dependent on the mother into the…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:48 PM
1

I never stated a number. Learn to read
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:26 PM
1

Why does every message a woman sends related to her vagina? Then she has the audacity to say we sexualize them.
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 06:25 PM
2

"Lucky sub" lol. This has to be a parody account
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 06:20 PM
1

I never claimed to have stats. In fact, I even stated no records are kept as far as I know. You might want to read it again
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:21 PM
1

I don't think anyone keeps statistics on it. But, you can see which states allow abortion up until points where babies can survive outside of womb: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abortions Up to 10% of babies can survive outside the womb at 22 weeks. By 24 weeks 50% survive.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:08 PM
5

It will likely eventually change. Something will trigger it and whites will come together. Of the white people I know it seems like most have seething anger under the surface. They are tired of being spit on. Wait for a yellow vest movement that triggers them and we will see what happens.
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 05:10 AM
3

Literally men are better at everything than women. The only niche a woman fulfills is carrying a baby or offering sexual pleasure to a guy. In every other domain the average woman is far worse than the average man.
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 05:06 AM
1

This article is just false. It is more like 25 years old in China. In Japan it is the same. In Japan they call it "Christmas cake girl". Everyone wants the xmas cake before the 25th of December. After xmas they get thrown out.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 05:03 AM
1

It's always good to file. However, the real problem is that the state has discretion on whether to prosecute. So, what often happens is you would file a report and the state would trash bin it. There needs to be a way to sue the government or remove prosecutional discretion or make it go to a panel or something. Because many, many times this is the source of judicial corruption where the state picks and chooses which cases to prosecute and which to ignore.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 06:44 AM
3

There needs to be a mechanism to sue the government. Prosecution for sex crimes does NOT require the victims participation. The state should be prosecuting these crimes on behalf of the victim. The real problem is the state has discretion. They choose to not prosecute these crimes even if the victim requests them to. The latter case is the worst tragedy. The only way to resolve this is to hold the state accountable and create a system that forces prosecution or forces the prosecutional discretio…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 06:42 AM
43

Thinly veiled? It's pretty in-your-face misandry
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:20 PM
–

Men complaining: Cry baby Woman complaining: That is their normal state.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:19 PM
1

You know I am talking about their vast array of non-durable goods. Most of their business is non-durable goods: detergents, cleaners, shampoos, pastes, etc Good job switching to Harrys
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:53 PM
1

It's great all the free publicity Gillete and big companies are giving us. It will likely successfully create a counter culture if they keep it up.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:38 PM
1

Women condition men to seek validation in women via sex. They train men to tie their self-worth to the sexual attention they get from women. And, then they make that attention scarce to up it's market value. Men conditioned by this perspective also do it to other men. This keeps men chasing women and their offerings (sex) and thus keeps the resource flow going from Men -> Women. Recognize it for what it is and ignore it. If they start shaming you, then you know you are doing something right.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:37 PM
10

This is why men don't get results. They are taught to sacrifice and surrender. No burden is too great for a man's shoulder. It's time to STOP. Men are not meant for sacrifice. We deserve justice and equality.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:21 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koPmuEyP3a0
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:20 PM
1

P&G only robs people. Never forget this. Even before this scandal they were robbing hard earned money from people. There are many reasons to dump them: https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/781494/Fairy-washing-up-liquid-test
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:19 PM
0

Lot's of chemicals are in Tide FYI. The detergent chemicals in them are very, very bad. I would highly recommend replacing it with a detergent free product or a more natural product.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:17 PM
6

I bet almost everyone spends at least $100 a year between all their consumer goods, minimum. All their products are easily substitutable with other brands. Losing out of $100+ a year from 10s of thousands of angry men will add up. Keep in mind, when my friends ask me about product X that is P&G I will tell them hell no. When they come to my house they will see other brands on my shelf not P&G brands, etc. So, boycotts affect more consumers than just those who are boycotting directly.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:16 PM
21

Even if they were produced in a P&G factory they are taking reduced profits on it, so it still did some good. Perfect is the enemy of good.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:14 PM
1

Not really. We would just be buying from local companies that provide healthier products at worst or just buying from main-stream brands that stay out of politics and culture wars. Buying local and natural products is probably better than the harmful products these conglomerates sell. Conglomerate products are always bad because they include toxins in them that make them more shippable. A locally produced product doesn't need to worry about shipping 7000 miles and sitting in warehouses for 4 yea…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:12 PM
1

I don't think that is an apt analogy. The better analogy would be blaming the person for what the person's hand did. Which is exactly what we generally do. Once someone stabs someone we don't say "The hand was evil but the person is good!" It is true that some conglomerates are almost like a mutual fund in that the head of the beast has little control over each unit. However, P&G has a history of of all units being very anti-men and generally un-american and it is not run with such a laissez fai…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:09 PM
1

I removed it from the list. I used Rexona. Not sure why I thought it was P&G. Glad I won't have to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:07 PM
10

Here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ag6qyf/boycotting_proctor_gamble_parent_of_gillete/ Add any others you know of to the comments. The ones in that list are verified. Grouped somewhat by product type.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:39 AM
10

If you want to punish P&G, then boycott them: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ag6qyf/boycotting_proctor_gamble_parent_of_gillete/
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:39 AM
1

Boycott them: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ag6qyf/boycotting_proctor_gamble_parent_of_gillete/
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:38 AM
3

Don't limit it to Gillete. Boycott all proctor and gamble products. Such as Tide, Crest, Herbal Essence, etc. These have cheaper alternatives, so men can save money in the process.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 09:14 AM
2

Men don't need to be told to improve. They need suicide help, homelessness help, help to reform the family court system. THIS is the help men need. Fix those things and you likely will get improved male behavior as a side benefit.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:53 AM
12

Don't limit it to razor blades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands They have a LOT of brands you probably use everyday. You don't need to quit all of them if you can't, but even quitting a few will make a big impact.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:48 AM
1

Don't switch to oral-B. I believe they own that. I recommend sensodyne
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:47 AM
1

Don't fall into the trap thinking you must do all-or-nothing. Even if you can quit a few products it is a massive help.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:47 AM
14

The bible spent the first chapter on a story that showed women will destroy utopia (garden of eden). It has many red pill truths. It is how we became civilized. We forgot it's teachers (no I am not religious, but it has important teachings) and in less than 100 years society is already devolving.
/r/MGTOW11/01/19 10:00 AM
1

But parking spots are gender neutral. Lots of people have mobility needs. Why should the spots be designated only for specific females with mobility needs? It has nothing to do with being pregnant or not pregnant. All pregnancy is a qualifier for someone with mobility needs. That is the justification for the spots. And, the thing is, we do not need to use "pregnancy" as a signal for mobility needs. We can just directly measure mobility needs, regardless of gender, and distribute those spots acco…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 06:20 PM
1

The parking spaces should be made for anyone with mobility issues. If someone has mobility issues, then they get a permit such as from a doctor. This includes pregnant women. I am against pregnant spots because they are discriminatory. They are created based on gender and not based on need as we already have a system for people that have mobility issues (handicap) which can be modified for late-stage pregnant women.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:16 PM
10

She also should owe him damages. Not just repayment.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:15 PM
1

Well, it's not like women don't use toilet paper. This is more of a case of manufactured guilt. Feminist rewrote history and convinced a lot of people they are some oppressed minority class (despite being the majority). As a result, there is collective guilt and no one wants to appear that they are disadvantaging a woman.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:46 AM
1

Welfare is just as important. Though, financial abortion is part of that equation (forced child support to an unwilling father is really welfare paid by an individual).
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:43 AM
1

I want to add Welfare to that list and Child Support with no parental opt-out for men similar to what women have (abortion, child abandonment, adoption). As such, there is almost no incentive for a woman to have sex with an equal status man.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:42 AM
4

You didn't read my post. There is no men and violence issue. There is a human violence issue. A very small percentage of humans. Some of them are men and some are women. Should we talk about the people with brown hair and violence problem? See how ridiculous you are framing it from the beginning?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:36 AM
1

So should there also be parking for beer guts? It's also hard walking with a beer gut and that is also a lifestyle choice.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:53 AM
1

At some point there will be a trigger event and men will collectively wakeup and realize society doesn't offer them that much and flipping the game board is likely best (after all, why not when already at the bottom). When that happens the yellow vest protests in france will look small and non-violent in comparison.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:47 AM
1

Same. In the reverse this is classified as rape at worst and domestic abuse at best. Yet when men are the victims it is not acknowledged
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:39 AM
3

Why does society socialize male productivity via taxes and transfers to women, but it does not socialize female sexuality?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:38 AM
1

Humans are violent. Saying that men, as a group, is very ignorant. Why would you include men as a whole and exclude females? The vast majority of men that do not create violence are as innocent as females who do not commit violence so why are they being included in a group of violent offenders?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:37 AM
1

As you pointed out, attacking female privilege is a primary goal of MRA. Any privilege means society has defined a right that exists and then denied it to men. That is what privledge is and we should attack it with ferocity.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:34 AM
1

This post implies that it is shocking it should be done without a doctors note. To the contrary, why would a personal choice require the input of a doctor? Gender fluidity is not medical. It is a personal choice. As far as MRA, it is a good news as it invalidates all gender-based discrimination. From government contracts, to SBA loans, men can now become women during the application process to get special privileges.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:33 AM
12

If a man does that it is considered sexual assault. Unwanted sexual attention. If a woman does it and you look in her direction, then YOU are sexually assaulting her despite her showing off her body
/r/MensRights31/12/18 02:19 PM
1

Hell, does that include women who wear short skirts and show cleavage? You will notice that men do not display nearly as much skin as women. Women are constantly sexually assaulting everyone around them.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 02:18 PM
9

A false rape allegation creates at least as much trauma as a rape: forced imprisonment sometimes for 1+ years while trial resolves, shaming, lifetime of people doubting, etc. It deserves at least the punishment that rape does
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:24 AM
3

No. When women take the cushy military jobs that just means more men go as cannon fodder. In fact, in WW2 the government had ads that told women to join the military to free up a man to go to the front lines. Women need to go to the front lines or no one should be joining the military.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:50 PM
1

Women are so oppressed! /s
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:20 PM
1

So you want all the cushy jobs to go to women to free up more males to be human shields for bullets? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:20 PM
3

NOT murder. It is just a "clump of cells". Only when said "clump of cells" is destroyed by a man does it shapeshift into being a person and therefore murder.
/r/MGTOW26/11/18 06:50 PM
7

It's because women are useless physically. So, the idea is to put them into non-physical roles which requires education. Otherwise they will have just live a life pushing out babies, which is something society does not need. That's the reasoning. Not saying it is right or fair or best.
/r/MGTOW26/11/18 06:40 PM
2

Every female owned company that I have known the owners is the same scam. It's the man behind it. It's just her name on the paper.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:32 PM
2

So if I guy rents a porsche to decieve the woman into thinking he is richer than she is, should she then be required to pay half the car rental fee? That is the logic used here. Incredible.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:30 PM
2

More important why should men pay women because women are manipulating men? It is like a guy who rents a porche in order to manipulate his date into thinking he is richer than he is and then asks her for the bill for the car rental
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:42 PM
11

It's dangerous for a woman to be allowed to stay home. That entitles her to half the man's income as soon as she gets bored at home and cheats. People follow incentives. The old nuclear family won't return until the laws change to make it not so risky.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:36 PM
2

Please tell us about the land. Close to what city? How much? Do you plan to build a house there and homestead?
/r/MGTOW25/11/18 06:34 AM
1

Well by that definition right wing is pro-men. "Socialism" mostly benefits women. We already see this in our current tax system. For example the New Zealand tax study revealed women cost the state $150,000 over their lifeetime. The difference is paid for by men. So, in general, socialist policies is a transfer of wealth from men to women.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 03:47 AM
5

It wasn't always that way. The bible, in it's first chapter, had a parable that warned men to be cautious of women. Their nature is evil. The Quran it says that a woman's rape claim must have 4 male witnesses to be believed. This type of policy was not made "out of thin air". The ancient people's who wrote this policy saw an issue of fake allegations, lies, and deceit and new that a woman's testimony was not worth anything.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 02:36 AM
2

Women are better at multi tasking and more people focused. This isn’t in debate. It actually is in debate because it is not true. https://hbr.org/2018/09/research-women-and-men-are-equally-bad-at-multitasking
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:45 AM
1

I am always confused what people refer to when they say "right wing". What are the characteristics that you use to identify if something is right wing or not?
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:38 AM
1

And the pic of the "homeless" is wearing high-heeled boots? Insanity
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:37 AM
1

It is not limited to moms and not all women are moms especially nowadays. femsplaining is better
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 11:16 PM
1

The reason is because women are more scared of germs. The result of this is they "hover" over the toilet and as a result piss, shit, and bleed over everything.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:30 PM
1

Most privileged men have wives that are equally privledged.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:29 PM
1

Unless the bathrooms have cameras, then it creates an unsafe environment for men where a woman can make a false rape claim. As a result of this bathrooms definitely need to be segregated.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:28 PM
3

A lot of those men are beholden to a female vote. Women make up more than half the voting age and 80% of consumer spending. So, politicians / companies have to cater to them. If you look at a lot of the imbalances in society where women gained enormous privilege without any responsibility it was after they gained the right to vote.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:24 PM
1

Yes, more than children I would say.
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 05:18 AM
3

I was in Mensrights and a married guy complained that he and his wife got banned from MGTOW. He thought it was ridiculous because they both supported MGTOW and he was going his own way and his own way meant being married and being married should be accepted in MGTOW. I was thankful for the mods in that moment to not let these fools infiltrate the community.
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 05:18 AM
9

Yes, that is what he said. For every tax dollar they pay we pay 2 (200c)
/r/MensRights22/11/18 05:43 PM
7

In all likelihood she is not in trouble. The state has discretion on which crimes to pursue even if a crime was committed. That is a big problem because the state just does not pursue crimes against women. Individuals need to have the power to sue the state if they fail to prosecute a crime committed against them.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 11:42 PM
1

Women and men who care about gender mutilation of women who now need to advocate for a gender neutral approach
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:04 PM
1

Equality is never backwards. Now men will gain new allies in getting all mutilation banned.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 02:37 AM
1

Actually, if you look at women's voting pattern they largely vote distributive policy from men to women. Most social programs disproportionately help women. So, no, it is not only the rabid feminists that are a problem. Even every day pedestrian women are too.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:23 AM
1

You have to understand there is a gender war. The sooner men realize that the better. Women are not the friend of men.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:01 AM
6

Yes, we do want equality. Men are not disposable and should not be dying. ALL deaths should be reduced. But, there will always be some deaths and it should be 50% women.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:58 AM
1

Based on my observation female journalists outnumber men.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:58 AM
4

Use http://duckduckgo.com/
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:57 AM
7

This is why men who punch random women on the street never go to jail they just say they felt threatened. Oh wait a minute, that never happens and those guys are always charged with a crime So, the next question is, only the state can decide what crimes to prosecute. What is an individuals right when the state is not pursuing crimes against him due to discrimination? There needs to be a mechanism that a citizen can sue the state to force them to pursue a crime or to pay penalty of a group of pee…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:26 PM
1

Comoros
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 02:39 AM
1

Not really. Paternity was never known until the last 50 years. Oftentimes women had kids from the "smart men" and the betas that provided for them never got kids. Also, in many times humans lived in times of abundance. Women could actually provide for their offspring without the men giving much of any resources. You see this even in modern tribal societies that perform gangbangs on women frequently. The child is then the responsibility of mostly the women. Sure, the men protect and hunt for the …
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 09:26 PM
1

Looks like a Title IX issue if it is not equally done.
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 08:39 PM
1

You are missing the point. MGTOW is not about indoctrination. It is a group of men that self-identify on those rules. You cannot be MGTOW if you are married point blank and that is why you were banned. You are not identifying on the same rules as everyone else in the group. It is like joining a group of people that their shared value or commonality is a love for basketball. But, then going to the meetings and saying you hate basketball even though you support the groups right to love basketball.…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 12:31 AM
2

Every man is "going his own way". The point of MGTOW is there is some specific rules. Such as no marriage and no cohabitation. If there was zero rules, then it would have no point as then every behavior would be classified as MGTOW.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 05:01 PM
1

Agreed, that is the only answer. No movement really got concessions without the threat of violence. Even movements that "won" were only written that way in the history books. Usually there was a parallel movement based in violence and that is really what caused the change. The history books then get written where all credit goes to the more "diplomatic" movement.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:33 AM
2

It was the point of it actually. And, these incentivized accusations will be entered into the official stats for "domestic abuse" making it look like men abuse more than they do. That will then be used to justify this law post-fact.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:09 AM
13

Exactly. The ONLY defense is MGTOW.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:08 AM
3

Ah, so that's why she said she didn't want to hurt him. Didn't want to hurt her next paycheck. Better get a backup to branch swing to I guess
/r/MGTOW17/11/18 03:53 AM
5

It's produced by the NZ governemnt (the source data).
/r/MensRights16/11/18 05:24 AM
1

Exactly. It's definitely not whites that do it.
/r/MGTOW16/11/18 05:20 AM
15

I don't love weak women either. All women are the same: parasites
/r/MGTOW12/11/18 11:05 PM
3

The huge number of MGTOW comments just show how mainstream mgtow is. People may not know the term, but they live the life.
/r/MGTOW12/11/18 11:04 PM
3

This is how it should be framed. All single men can self-identify as gay to get around it
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:11 PM
2

Well, he is part of a system that took away your rights as a man. So there is that. Now pay up
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:10 PM
6

Where they are wrong is that there is nothing "Fringe" about mgtow. There are millions and millions of men who are participating even if they don't know it.
/r/MGTOW11/11/18 09:08 PM
1

That has nothing to do with what I posted. If you want to solve those issues, then you need to make prostitution legal.
/r/MGTOW11/11/18 08:17 PM
2

MGTOW, despite what some posters are putting, is NOT about simply "going your own way". EVERY person is doing that, by definition. So that would mean all blue-pills are MGTOW. The basic rules for MGTOW are the following: Do not marry a woman Do not cohabitate with a woman And, these rules come from the root guiding principal of MGTOW: Keep your resources for yourself and do not give them to women. For many MGTOW men it will also include do not have kids as that is a trojan horse to resources. Ca…
/r/MGTOW11/11/18 06:27 PM
1

Did those non-government organizations get money from government? Usually they do. Money is fungible. So if they got $1 from taxpayers then that means taxpayer money is being used to discriminate.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:16 PM
18

It's also one we need to change. Men are brainwashed from use to sacrifice themselves for women (look at disney movies). Men are not disposable and their life is as valuable as womens.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:13 PM
3

It depends. Fuckable if the offered themselves no strings no effort and I wanted some new pussy? Probably 30% in my age group. Fuckable as in me willing to learn their name and pretend to be interested in their interests, etc, probably 3%.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 07:12 PM
10

Exactly. Instead of calling them manipulators or liars like they are in this situation men given women the benefit of the doubt (chivalry) and call them "complicated"
/r/MGTOW07/11/18 06:51 PM
11

It is really chivalry. Like you said women cannot be trusted, they are not dependable, they are fickle, complain, change their mind, they manipulate. Instead of calling out this bad behavior men make an excuse for them. Instead of a woman being a liar when she says "everything is okay" then later says it is not, we say "You are so complicated!".
/r/MGTOW07/11/18 06:50 PM
40

Many false rape / sexual assault claims seem to have their origin in women trying to cover their own bad behavior.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:45 PM
3

This guy's email can be found at https://www.umflint.edu/som/mark-perry if anyone wants to tell him thanks for his activism.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 05:43 PM
1

I actually think it should be worse punishment. Someone gets raped they experience an hour of physical discomfort and psychological issues for life. Someone gets falsely accused they likely face a year of physical discomfort (jail, even waiting for trial) plus a lifetime of psychological issues plus a lifetime of social exclusion. It is very clear that one is a much worse crime than the other.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 05:33 PM
1

Other studies have demonstrated exactly that
/r/MensRights06/11/18 05:29 PM
1

Did the mom french the kid?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:03 PM
13

I don't think MRA need to denounce this just like when a woman kills her baby feminist do not need to denounce it. This has nothing to do with MRA, so it does not need to steal our attention. If anything, this is a sign of an MRA issue: Mental health and circumstances are so bad for young men that it is pushing a few to extremes.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 08:20 PM
8

It could also be incels are part of a society that has set the deck against men. And, while most people are very rational and not psycho, obviously oppression of men will lead a select few to do insane things.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 08:18 PM
2

I was going to the say the same thing. If a man shows a woman the outline of his dick it is definitely sexual assault. Yet women get away with this every day. I don't want to see this disgusting shit.
/r/MGTOW05/11/18 07:12 PM
5

3/4 proven lies. Good chance the remaining 1/4 are also lies too.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:53 AM
2

alpha fucks beta bucks
/r/MGTOW04/11/18 06:06 AM
2

Anyone have Mike's email address so we can say thanks?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:25 PM
1

Women have already protested sex bots in brothels
/r/MGTOW03/11/18 05:18 PM
3

Of course not. If she broke it off it is because he failed to meet the expectations promised to her, so he is thus raping her.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:05 PM
1

So it is a law that generates false abuse claims. This inflates the domestic abuse stats. The newly inflated domestic abuse statistics will be used to justify the law and to create new laws.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:34 AM
9

There is no middle ground. When you want a return to the stone age because you fear climate change you cannot "meet in the middle" because that means human extinction. When you believe it is your right to have free healthcare there is no meeting in the middle. It is either high quality, unlimited, and free or it is a violation of your human rights. etc
/r/MensRights31/10/18 08:58 PM
1

You aren't people!
/r/MensRights31/10/18 08:33 PM
1

They can't be for kids when they can take the kids away from you using the power of the state.
/r/MGTOW31/10/18 08:32 PM
6

Another way would be to give the man X months after discovery. So, it matters not if he discovers when the child is 1 month in the womb or 8 years old he has 3 months.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 11:26 PM
2

Unfortunately he is a california liberal. He did a show with a straight face about the disgust of Trump / Republicans for "separating children from their families" due to them being illegal and going in a deportation center awaiting trial. Yet, this moral outrage failed to mention that society is already quite fine separating children from family. There are millions of men in jail and alienated fathers and there is not a peep from the left about how they are separated from their families. Howeve…
/r/MGTOW27/10/18 05:38 PM
3

I don't need to know the answer to that. If there is even one man on earth that wants to go then he should be able to go. Unless men also have the right to have male-only spaces and free-association then women cannot either. That's equality. If your thesis is as you expect that no man would want to go, then they can achieve their goal of a female-only beer event by opening it to all men and women. When only women show up they have their goal with no discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:24 AM
1

It's a scam. This video got as many views as all her other videos combined. In 2 weeks she will announce due to the outpour of support for her that she will continue youtube. Now with even more fans.
/r/MGTOW25/10/18 04:14 AM
1

Until you have a stronger police force behind you, then the law does apply. That is reality, unfortunately. No amount of hand waving will stop that.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:55 AM
1

Now send in a resume for a babysitting job one with the name "joe" and one with "jane" and see who gets more callbacks.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:16 AM
1

They should only organize as the law allows. In this case, the law does not allow it. If women want to do this they need to change the law to allow men to do it.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:13 AM
1

Who is peer reviewing CERN? They literally have a billion dollar particle accelerator. It's quite hard for many other groups to spend several billion dollars to peer review any results that result from that.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:02 AM
2

It is something to philosophize about. Does a slave commit a moral or immoral act if he rises against his oppressive master? Of course, during the time of slavery, that was considered immoral and illegal. However, in the modern time, I think everyone cheers the slave that kicked the ass of their master.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:17 PM
1

Until either he or she dies basically.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:08 AM
13

She wants a guy that was born rich
/r/MGTOW20/10/18 12:26 AM
2

Agreed. Men are the intellectual and creative fountains of humanity. Once we have artificial wombs it should be illegal to birth a woman. Though, I suspect even if it is still legal, simple market forces will make women nearly disappear regardless.
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 08:11 PM
1

Alimony should be outlawed. No person deserves money from another because they became "accustomed" to it. We always assume relationships are equal, so someone who was having their life taken care of was providing services for the other person such as cooking, cleaning, etc. If they deserve financial compensation, then why are they not required to continue to provide the services the other party became "accustomed" to?
/r/MensRights16/10/18 02:20 AM
2

I am glad you stood up for yourself. A store also did this to me and I pointed to women with their bags and said I refuse until every woman has checked their bag. They backed down and I don't see them asking anyone to check bags anymore.
/r/MGTOW15/10/18 08:21 AM
8

Same. Either men also get a choice or neither should have a choice. I moved to pro-life because I don't see any moves to be pro-choice for men.
/r/MGTOW15/10/18 08:16 AM
1

How so? Because it "feels" right?
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:16 AM
1

A country full of woman with no fighting force. I wonder what would happen.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:16 AM
1

I believe half of all women are treated for a mental disorder. Whether BPD or depression or anxiety ,etc.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:12 AM
3

Yes, agreed. The father is innocent. If society really wants to trap the guys income for the "benefit of the child" then once that child is an adult the woman should have to payback all said income to the "father" as that was his damages for paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:10 AM
1

Any tourist in Thailand is filled with prostitutes. If you are at a bar they will come up in talk to you. I have talked to quite a few. Almost 100% of the time they are working to send money back to their mom.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 07:37 PM
7

How about men stop giving women money? That will balance the purchasing power
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:21 PM
9

Men are at the point where they want results. If this gives results then so be it. If you have another method, then please share.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:21 PM
20

If this was a man everyone would be saying he should be hanged. I feel the same about this woman
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:19 PM
9

I am tired of these children raping their teachers!!! /s
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:19 PM
1

All the things you mentioned are things that a MGTOW man can and should easily avoid. Taxes are not unless you want to break the law and suffer a penalty. So yes, I do prioritize the lesser of two evils. I prefer policy that every MGTOW man benefits from. Reduce taxes and the beast will starve itself eventually.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 06:04 AM
2

I do not wear clothes that make my genitalia hang out and show my butt cheeks for example. Usually I wear pants and a normal shirt that covers my arms I do not post near-naked pictures on instagram and sexualize myself for everyone to see If someone approaches me with sexual intentions I tell them "no" very clearly, so there is no mistake of my intentions.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:49 PM
1

A democrat can do nothing for you. They hate you. 75% of women 18-35 are democrat. That is their constituent and that is who the party panders to.
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:41 PM
1

bettering the social safety net One thing to remember is that even when the democrats are in favor of this it is not to YOUR benefit. They want to better this safety net for women. The majority of government programs benefit women at far, far, far higher rates. And, the taxes to pay for them affect men at far, far, far higher rates. So, the net-result is that for men the social programs are a bad deal.
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:38 PM
-1

The GOP is too left wing and too authoritarian for me Nothing is more authoritarian than hating due process like the democrats. I also wish the GOP was less authoritarian, but next to the democrats the GOP are a free love party.
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:36 PM
3

Agreed. Some of my friends say "Both parties are evil so I will not vote". What they don't realize is that while that is true one is clearly less evil and antagonistic towards men. And that party, even if it is not perfect, deserves a vote.
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:34 PM
7

The OP stated something that is categorically impossible and the entire premise of the question depends on that false assumption: Women who are genuinely a good person From a man's perspective I do not think it is possible for a woman to be a good person. There is always female nature. And that means she will be selfish, narcissistic, hypergamous, and manipulating. If you think she is a good person it is likely she is signalling to you she is good. This is likely more manipulation to incite spec…
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:31 PM
3

I think these authors are right. Titanic was an outlier. Probably because it was a bunch of rich people. Look at rich people in the US. They are a bunch of white people who scream about white privledge. Rich people are prone to suicide. On a normal boat the men would not have that. If I was on a sinking ship I would not willingly die first.
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 07:26 PM
2

As long as the state has existed men have never benefited by women. Men were also used to further the goals of the state and by extension women.
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 06:43 AM
7

What about: Dying in war in vast numbers within decades of the date you mentioned? What about STILL not having the right to vote even to this very day? It is a privilege only if a male offers his body as a body shield for the army. Even if you discount that, MEN did not have the ability to vote that much before that date. Only specific elite men could vote. What about not being able to be a house husband and stay home with the kids all day because men are looked down upon in the household and no…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:39 AM
3

Did you go all in on super micro stock?
/r/MGTOW06/10/18 11:01 PM
1

Knowing it was on video I would have KOed her entitled ass. I wish I knew the whole story. I mean turning around and smacking someone is not normal. There is no audio so I wonder what was being said, etc.
/r/MGTOW05/10/18 06:00 AM
1

Not 25x those
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:18 AM
7

What's interesting is men spend LOT'S of time preventing rape. How about doing stuff like not wearing clothes that are meant to be sexually revealing? Women wear clothing specifically to attract men. They post on instagram specifically to sexually arouse men. Then they complain when the "wrong" men get sexually aroused. Men don't do any of that stuff. Men don't kiss and dry hump a woman they don't want to have sex with. Women will kiss and dry hum and even touch a guys penis and then say "No sex…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 07:39 PM
2

Fore very man who goes his own way it is more burden for the men not going their own way. And, under said burden, some of those men start thinking fuck I will go my own way too. It is a feedback loop.
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 06:30 PM
3

Stop distinguishing. It is women. Do not remove blame from women by reducing it down to just feminist.
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 06:23 PM
1

Can you point to specific decisions? Sometimes business interest is everyone's interest. Sometimes the issue is a deeper freedom of speech or association issue that affects everyone not just businesses. Sometimes it is protection from a tyrannical government which is everyone's interest. Sometimes it is due to it being a states right issue, which is pro-democracy as democracy is local. For me, the primary criticism I have seen leveled against him Fourth Amendment rulings. That is a very serious …
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:14 PM
1

What is wrong with is professional record?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:05 PM
1

That was very, very different. If Obama failed to propose a good candidate then it is the right of congress to reject him. That is why they were elected and that is how the system is supposed to work. What is completely outside of the process is creating false accusations and ruining a man's life and thus stalling the process of the democratically elected majority of congress. Do you see the difference between the two?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:04 PM
3

Have a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_wiretapping_law It looks like illinois has this law and it is not very well tested by the constitution. Previously already ruled unconstitutional. They now have a new law that accounts for recording in public. My guess is that there will be no issue. Just don't turn it on in a bathroom. Every time someone uses Alexa or Siri etc it takes a recording of all ambient noise. This also includes the conversation of people who did not consent. I h…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:01 AM
3

Well, he has been making direct change. Look how he is changing universities lack of due process.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:55 AM
3

Yes, but we are talking about trump. He is right a lot more than a broken clock!
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:54 AM
6

No need to mention mgtow. Just show support and let him know speaking truth is right.
/r/MGTOW02/10/18 01:26 AM
2

Yes: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-europe-45703700?_ If you don't believe it because it is too out and the open and shameful to be true: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C029 Article 11
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:50 PM
1

"Only adult able-bodied males who are of an apparent age of not less than 18 and not more than 45 years may be called upon for forced or compulsory labour." -- UN Forced Labor Convention Agreement
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:39 PM
3

The moment we demand it is when we can actually win it.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:38 PM
10

This is why guns are a human right. The question becomes when does it become an obligation for men to use them?
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 08:37 PM
19

No, we should start demanding what we deserve.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:13 PM
1

Until the tradcon divorces you and since she was underemployed or did not work at all will take you for all you got.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 06:51 PM
2

I am exactly the same as you. I pray I am on a jury someday. I will not reveal any bias during all the prejury interviews. Then, I will always vote in favor of the victim. Not just in rape. In basically any criminal case unless there was some extraordinary evidence like multiple videos that werent' deep faked, dna evidence, testimony, and a confession.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 06:35 PM
1

Either than is $160k or $16k per month
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 06:28 PM
1

You can identify as a lesbian woman who likes male interests and styles.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:23 PM
1

Men are a stream of resources nothing more. Do you give rights to your car? Of course not. You just use it and extract as much utility as possible from it before you dispose of it.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:48 PM
3

You don't get it. Women are men. How many times do I need to point that out? It is a scientific fact. They have the exact same interest and capabilities as men. Therefore, any difference in representation is a sign of systemtic sexism. /s
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:30 PM
3

Oh, I guess its great we spent millions and millions of tax payer dollars to incentvize women into STEM and discouraged men from entering STEM.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:29 PM
2

Who cares? They are also the most impoverished state. They have huge liabilities too. You can have good finances at 2.7 trillion and at 100 billion. You can also have horrible finances at either number. California has horrible finances.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:27 PM
1

Equality is a one-way street.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:26 PM
1

There are no repercussions. Any repercussions would be violation of your human rights. They (populist politicians) have put themselves into a corner on this.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:25 PM
2

You mean those laws designed to enrich big business? Yup, they introduce those.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:23 PM
4

As someone who believes in equality there is a HUGE historical death gap of war deaths between men and women. It is so strikingly unbalanced that I think it is perhaps the most important equality that everyone should focus all their energy on.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 05:20 PM
2

It goes like this. Law says the "larger" person is always the perpetrator. So, men are arrested 90% of the time. Then, the stats show men are arrested 10x more for domestic violence than women. This is used to justify the law after teh fact. See how it is circular?
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 03:28 AM
1

Islam is super cucked. For example, look at Saudi Arabia All the man's earnings is shared. In fact, a man can go to jail for not giving his wife reasonable spending allowance. Now, let's pretend the woman works as some woman work. BY LAW the money is 100% hers. She has no obligation to even tell her husband how much she makes. Islam, christianity, etc, are all tradcucks and it is another form for SLAVERY
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 03:26 AM
2

Wars used to purge the cucks. Why? They are white knights. They volunteer to die. The MGTOW-type men and self-interested men avoid dying. The problem is we have not had a war. Think about the nation really started giong to shit in the 70s? There was no major war with mass casualties to kill off the white knights.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 03:24 AM
1

Yes, it is a hidden tax on successful blacks. I always avoid hiring black professionals like accountants, doctors, lawyers, etc precisely because of that doubt. The academic system is supposed to be a signal of "this person is qualified" but when it does not do that for a certain demographic then the signal also loses its value for that demographic.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 03:21 AM
7

First they will need to see if this requirement is even constitutional
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:05 AM
12

There is so much incentive to leave california and so little incentive to stay you would think california would realize their mistake.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:04 AM
1

Next time please say something. Even just say that you are uncomfortable at them standing in the bathroom and gawking at men using urinals.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:02 PM
1

Women are more compliant than men, which is what the military increasingly needs is a compliant drone. As warfare moves from the trenches to someone pressing a button on a drone, then it makes sense to have people very flexible sense of morality and ethics. Men in aggregate have a much more rigid sense of morality, so when you give an order to blow up a preschool it is much harder to sway them.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:45 PM
20

Why? I doubt it is real. He is spreading awareness of cheating hoes in the military.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 06:30 PM
42

Rewarding the most unproductive portion of your population (women) at the expense of the productive portion is not good survival strategy. So, any society that did adopt this quickly got plundered, pillaged, and massacred by societies that provided some benefit for the productive class (men). A female-first society won't ever last. The west is rich enough that society will sputter along. But, eventually it too will be overrun if the culture does not change.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:32 AM
1

The message is clear: If you are a man of power, you will face a rape claim unless you are towing the line and following the narrative.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:24 AM
9

The only way out of the impending productivity slump and resource shortage is war. The problem? No men willing to fight. Any man who gets drafted will be just as likely to use the gun on whoever drafted them. Sure, they think they have robots and drones. All that depends on well functioning infrastructure. When you have men that don't give a fuck infrastructure disappears / gets destroyed very fast.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:18 AM
3

No, it's legit. You have seen the male filled brothers on every street corner that popped up when dildos started being mass produced? The women went fucking insane. They were kidnapping boys. Tying up in chains in abandoned buildings and using them. I say that is proof of the claim. Oh wait, none of that happened at all.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:15 AM
2

No, it is just that all people involved are already known. All the FBI can do is take statements. And provide those statements to congress. There is nothing else to investigate considering the time and place is not known.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:19 AM
1

A full investigation can be done in 1 day. All they need to do is interview 5 people. All of which have already made sworn statements. There is no other evidence or lead to follow as there was no other details provided by Ford. She cannot even say how she arrived at the party or where or what time it took place. In fact, the only thing she seems to clearly remember is that it was Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:06 AM
2

Flake will be gone. He is not running for re-election which is why he does not feel accountable to his constituents.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 02:16 AM
24

Most importantly the laws always change. You can research today and it's all good, so you live with her. 5 years go by and the laws change. You break up. Now you are on the hook.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 02:14 AM
14

If she ever pays the mortgage or you make payments out of a joint account she could make claim that you were really were partners on the house and use those payments as evidence. A sympathetic judge could rule in her favor. Otherwise normally not. It is best to draw up a clear rental agreement with your SO though to avoid such a scenerio.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 02:13 AM
2

Except they are getting it both ways more often than not.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:20 AM
5

No, they want the consequences. Government gives them resources without having to have any interaction with men. Great deal. All the benefits of men with none of the cost.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 07:16 AM
3

Very true. Why the fuck is over 50% of the population and the most privileged part of the population taking advantage of the diversity initiative. Fuckign insane.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 06:29 AM
10

One day things will reach a tipping point and some lunatics will fire the first shots and it will be like a dominoes. All the people on the side lines will jump in and it will be chaos. I am just glad that lefties have self-disarmed.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 03:17 AM
4

A lot of these political seats are not contested especially at the local level (mayor, city council, etc).
/r/MGTOW27/09/18 11:36 PM
4

10 years in prison? Love it!
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:28 PM
2

Why does it matter for MGTOW man? Feminism helped MGTOW men. Men had it even worse under traditionalism. The real battle was never feminism. It was a society that requires no responsibility from women and unlimited responsibility from men.
/r/MGTOW27/09/18 05:59 PM
8

Why not? Throwing bleach on a man is violence against the man. She should get what she gives.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 03:38 AM
1

Well said and true. We all need this reminder sometimes.
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 05:46 AM
2

Their misstep is when you have no children (or children you really are bonded to in the case of millions of men who were alienated) then you also do not care about the future of society. They think they will escape from this, but when the house of cards falls there is going to be a lot of angry men with guns with absolutely no care for the future.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 11:03 PM
3

It's basically common law marriage as found in the states. Basically, if you live with a woman then you are considered de-facto married. The woman gets all the rights of a married woman such as when you die she gets your estate. And, as a consequence, she can also now divorce you and take all your stuff at a whim.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 11:01 PM
2

How long can a society survive oppressing the very people who produce everything for society? My guess is not long. The SJW warrior movement will collapse when the good times and golden age of quality of life ends. Once the men are weakened, the economy will collapse. The redistribution will further collapse things. At that point the government won't be able to afford the brainwashing and constant propaganda that feminism / SJW requires. And, we will come full circle where we will rise from the …
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 10:54 PM
1

Well, look at prison setnences between men and women. Women receive a 64% reduced sentence for the same crime.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 09:43 PM
1

So? That is the consequence for not following MGTOW. The first rule is never marry. This man is a sacrifice so that other men can learn. Enough men learn and culture can change and the laws as a result.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 07:34 PM
1

They passed a law about 4 years ago. If you have child support they revoke your passport. So, good luck in the foreign country on a revoked passport.
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 05:49 PM
9

Which leads to a more successful happy society? Well, based on happiness indexes it appears it makes women less happy and men neutral. Based on on sustainability, unless we move to a post-human world (everything run by machines) it is unlikely it is sustainable. Men are the productive, creative, and intellectual fountain of the human species. And, as of yet, we still depend on that to survive. Sometimes I like to look over the city. And, it is amazing, that almost everything you can see from the…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 07:18 PM
14

It has already been used to attack people for wrong-think. One week after it's adoption they went after a 10+ year linux contributor for being a "rape apologist". His crime? Saying that if a drunk woman cannot consent then neither can a drunk man so absent physical force the most that can occur is regret sex and not rape. Do not be lulled into thinking this appears good. It is like a woman. Appears good on the surface, but is a horrible, evil twisted creature on the inside.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:03 PM
2

There has always been a war between men and women. Elites are exasperating it for sure, but it always existed. Since the beginning of time women have been toxic and have been extracting resources from men like a parasite. Since the beginning of time there was alpha cocks beta bucks.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:00 PM
3

Feminism is a sexual strategy for most of the extremist. They cannot lock down male resources because they are too ugly, so they want to shape society to pay them for work even if they are not qualified or capable to do it.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:04 PM
1

Well, the idea it to re-classify all female led murders as something other than morder. So POOF abortion is not murder. It is abortion. Now we can make the stats say what we want.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:02 PM
7

A woman dumps a man when she realizes she has no use for him. Why would she show compassion to someone useless? That is how they view things.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:33 AM
1

Maybe or maybe not. It will also stir the dem base. If they don't confirm kavenaugh then dems will be VERY motivated to vote. If they do confirm him then repubs will be painted as insentivie rape apologist and this will motivate women to vote.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:29 AM
1

It is not fringe. Have you seen the marriage rates? Average age of marriage? Certainly, people who visit /r/mgtow is very fringe. However, many guys are MGTOW even if they never heard of the word. My guess is that it is over 3 percent of guys already.
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 07:28 AM
1

What was your experience about before and after? Did you find sex less or more pleasurable after?
/r/MensRights22/09/18 07:01 AM
1

A lie detector is not admissible in court because it doesn't work. And what would she even prove with a lie detector test? That she believes on some unknown night on some unknown year there was a situation that could have potentially led to sexual harassment, but which did not lead to it? It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:26 AM
1

The solution is to require evidence in order to jail someone. THAT is how you get less innocent men in jail. THEN, when there is no evidence you can in parallel look to see if this is a false accusation. And, if it is, then put HER in jail. That is the solution.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:22 PM
1

Is that a real tweet or a fake one? If so, I love that man. Almost no one speaks the truth.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:12 PM
4

Not my problem.
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 06:34 AM
1

Do we even know he met her at all? It could all be fabricated.
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 06:29 AM
1

You do know that FreeBSD adopted a "Code of Conduct" written by a purple haired tranny a year ago. The result has been a loss of contributors (many left the project due to the hostility) and a 50% reduction in donations. FreeBSD is a sinking ship.
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 06:27 AM
1

Even if it changes who cares? The law could be undone, but your new kid can't be undone and your on the hook for 18 years. Never trust. Of course it's great for guys who currently have kids. At least for as long as the law lasts.
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 06:21 AM
2

Why can the police not be sued for this? What if it then puts kids in danger who are now in the presence alone with an abuser?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:34 AM
8

I love it. only when these guys are affected will laws change. Keep it coming!
/r/MGTOW20/09/18 12:30 AM
3

You should tell her in a slave-master relationship it is the master that receives resources from the slave. So, she is correct it is like slavery, but she is incorrect about who is the slave.
/r/MGTOW20/09/18 12:28 AM
4

They are very mercenary in Asia. Don't think women are any different. Women's nature is consistent across the world.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:56 PM
1

No it does not. A religion may do that. A religious study class does not. It is a secular class that has nothing to do with indoctrination. It studies religions from historical perspective.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:27 PM
1

Religion is not an immutable trade. Don't be retarded.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:03 PM
1

Because he should not have to take a class that is about hating people based on immutable traits.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:35 PM
7

Contact the mens rights group / conservative lawyer groups
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:35 PM
1

You mean women don't refuse custody. Women receive custody by default even if it is a 50/50 state.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:50 AM
2

Because child support is actually woman support under a different name.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:48 AM
2

they should be equally supported by liberals, who have equal treatment as one of their core values Since when has liberals been about equal treatment? High support for affirmative action, awarding minorities and women government contracts over males and whites, etc. In fact, a core tenant of modern left is definite inequal treatment to compensate for supposed systemic inequalities. So, the left will dream up a potential systemic inequality with no proof. And, they will lobby and lobby for defini…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:46 AM
3

Government is about socializing what men provide women (resources) while ensuring women maintain full control over what they control (sex).
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:36 AM
1

Non-board member jobs are already quota based.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:34 AM
10

Exactly. Men are so pussy hungry they celebrate less competition when men die.
/r/MGTOW14/09/18 08:14 PM
2

Yes, I have seen some videos asking singaporean women on the street if men should continue serving two years and women not having to. All the women love it. Let's them have 2 years head start on job competition.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:05 AM
3

Through their logic the way it works is that men and women are equally qualified, interested, and capable for the job. So, the fact that there are less women means that the process excluded those women. The quota forces the process to include those women. In their view, the women included are equally talented because that was the original assumption of the argument.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 04:54 AM
1

Actually this is done to reduce sympathy. They used a youngish black male, which whether right or wrong is not a sympathetic group so it makes the message easier to dismiss. They could have used an old black men or a man of another race that was middle aged, etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:23 AM
6

Not only that you get SBA loans. You get government contracts, etc. It costs society 100s of billions of dollars spent in propaganda and direct wealth transfers to support this narrative that women and men have the same priorities in life. Disgusting. Especially since hard working men are paying for it.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 08:01 AM
1

A prosecutor looks better when they throw male rapists in jail. It's great for the career. Unfortunately, the demand for male rapists is higher than the supply, so they are forced to fabricate rapists to fulfill the gap.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 06:20 AM
1

Always record now and in the future. This will only help your cases in the future. That way instead of you-said he-said you can pull up the audio in the court room of them saying this stuff. That will give you an even stronger discrimination case. Believe it or not white men can win discrimination cases. They have been conditioned to not try though.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 06:08 AM
6

To better put it to words, the new zealand tax study revealed that women cost government $150,000 over their lifetime. That difference is made up by men who provide an equal amount of net-surplus in their lifetime, on average. So, as you can imagine, men checking out, who are the ones creating a net surplus, becomes very dangerous to society. If 5% of men checkout, then the remaining men who are the "workhorse" will now have to be net-surplus even that much more. Of course, that does not work be…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 05:46 AM
6

No, I don't think so. Most MGTOW guys probably don't even know who ayn rand is. It is simply that it is logical. Society uses men as a workhorse and then tells them they are privileged and then creates many traps to screw them (alimony, child support, sexual harassment claim, etc). So, it just is logical that a single man cannot face the government alone. All a single man can do is not feed the beast. In time, between the women, the refugees, the low skilled, and now the MGTOW men, the governmen…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 05:40 AM
1

That actually was proposed in the UK.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:39 AM
1

What did you do? Did you pay?
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:38 AM
3

Before you take your own life ensure you take the perpetrators too.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:37 AM
3

MGTOW is not just about no marriage / cohabitating. There is also an element of it is that anti-tax, living minimally, and even being a source of negative productivity for organizations (especially if working in government). The idea is that instead of being a productive member to be a burdensome or neutral member of society at best. In that way, it destroys the beast as the system collapses due to not enough productive people supporting the burdensome people.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:34 AM
2

It's actually a public good because it is becoming too large (> 50% of online sales and much higher percentage for the category books) and it is anti-competitive. It either needs a very hand of regulation or to be broken up. Maybe both.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 07:13 PM
2

You might want to file a domestic abuse claim before she does.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 09:49 PM
3

Yes he does. Look at divorce records.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 09:47 PM
3

Also what people miss is that culture has changed. Kids not longer feel obligated to help their parents. So, even if your kid is a super success they might just high tail it off to a developed country and never speak to the parents again. Seen it a hundred times.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 09:46 PM
2

Unfortunately you have to actually move there. Apply for the tax exemption and live there > 6 months a year. And, < a couple months a year in mainland US.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 07:21 PM
5

In India if you have sex with a woman and do not marry her afterwards that is legally rape. Sure, it is making advances, but it only looks that way because it was so ridiculously tilted against men in the first place
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:08 PM
7

Actually, alimony is completely immoral. It should be $0.00 or according to whatever the prenup decided. Women are free not to marry if the prenup does not include an aimony clause. Child support should also be $0.00 by default because 50/50 custody should be default. If either parent want to give up their custody in exchange for payment, then they can discuss this as the parents and come to their own arrangement.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 05:43 AM
1

WRONG. Men have not received the right to vote even today. If they have, please quote the law that says they have the right to vote. What men have is the privilege to vote if they sign up for the draft and use their body as human shields. That is far different than the right to vote, which is what women have.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:25 PM
5

Yes, I wish more women followed this advice.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:23 PM
1

To where? Every country is gynocentric. At some point men have to have a revolution.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:16 PM
7

From my understanding the women's charter doesn't make it hard for me to claim alimony. It makes it outright impossible. Even if a man raised the children for 18 years and she made a million dollars a year he would see none of it. Correct me if I am wrong.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:15 PM
4

Here is a relevant quote from the document: I fail to see how this strategy can be seen as substantive discrimination in the overall societal context, in light of the privileged position that men hold in our society. Interesting, that proven discrimination is invalidated due to unproven sense of privilege that men hold.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:12 PM
1

I am 30s. When I was 18-20 girls would try to get to me pay. My solution was just not to take them out, ever. Only my place for movie and chill. Nowadays, I continue with that, but afterwards we might grab a bite. And, they always pay their share. Not me forcing. They seem to want to pay half now. Not sure if times have changed in the 10 years or if the women, being older, have changed as they realize their value has shifted downwards.
/r/MGTOW08/09/18 05:00 PM
12

Maybe, but the actual effects is plain avoidance. I have guy friends who are libtards, are not MGTOW in any capacity, and even they are pulling back from women.
/r/MGTOW08/09/18 04:54 PM
3

Women have always been toxic. Hence why you get ancient literature like the bible that warns of the female weakness. In fact, it dedicates the first chapter of its book to female sin. The difference now is that the blue-pill propaganda is not as effective due to the blatant visibility of both their venom and other men communicating red-pills via the internet.
/r/MGTOW07/09/18 07:46 PM
2

Agreed. I think there are issues that affect men's lives more like retirement ages that do not reflect lifespan (women get 5 years longer in retirement than men despite paying less into the system), occupancy deaths, healthcare funding, domestic violence, rape culture (meaning men being raped and not taken seriously), etc. Circumcision is important but based on my conversation with MANY men most don't seem sympathetic to it. It is hard to admit that circumcision was bad when you yourself are cir…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:48 AM
2

Once they take his job to distribute it to a woman for nothing more than being a woman, then he might stop donating. Though who knows, he sounds like he could go on a starvation diet so he can use his last pennies to keep donating. You gotta take care of the women, you know.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:05 PM
6

The one paying for this billboard is a quasi government corporation. It is pretty sick that they are able to do this.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:57 PM
1

Tech community is major cucked. Look at facebook.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:09 AM
2

I think it is more bragging. "Look I have a girlfriend everyone look at me".
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:08 AM
1

White knights were not meant to reproduce. They were meant to be culled in wars as they are the first ones to volunteer to go to their death. The problem is that we haven't had a war with high casualty rates to cull them from society.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:07 AM
1

I admit I have been fooled by those pants. Nice to see how it is with a comparison like this.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:05 AM
3

I am a big fan of sex dolls. The one in the pic does not look great. Definitely seen better
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:03 AM
2

I live and where I pay my taxes Big mistake. Move to a different country and pay them taxes. Spain deserves no money.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:45 PM
17

It is better that 10 innocent men go to jail than 1 sexual assaulter / abuser / anyone who inconveniences a woman is let free. /s
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:38 PM
1

You assume that men are the one that mold women. It is the other way around. Women mold men. That is why society is built around women.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:53 AM
-1

I think you are living in a fantasy land. Single mother households don't breed respect for men. THe children get indoctrinated at home by the mother. Then they go to primarily female only schools (female teachers) and get more indoctrinated. Lastly they go to uni and get indoctrinated and then the workplace they set through bullshit to get more. Feminism is a HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars industry. It is insane how much government is spending on this propaganda. The only thing that will stop i…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:52 AM
1

Women are not molded. They manipulate those around them. Every day you seem women put on makeup, wear a pushup bro, wear high heels, etc. And you just think "women will be women". Wakeup and recognize what it is. It is manipulation. They are trying to illicit specific responses in those around them by how they dress and act. That is a womans' "soft power". Men have strength. To survive, women learn to manipulate social situations.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:39 AM
1

You should try to be a white guy getting a job in japan. It's brutal. They haven't had a white president in forever. Not even in their congress. When will we bring "diversity" to japan?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:36 AM
1

Yeah, and many of them have laws that are against men. In many muslim society's if the woman works the husband has no claim to her money yet she has claim to all his money, etc. A man is legally obligated to work for his woman. It is basically cuckery 10x. Men are always the ones burdened by the presence of women I guess. I can't wait for artificial wombs and sex bots to be cheaper and more realistic. That will make women useless.
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 02:12 AM
3

Here is a life lesson for you: Blue pilled men are a lot like women. Women do a lot of horrible shit because they are obsessed with women (themselves). Blue pill men also do a lot of horrible shit because they are obsessed with women (pussy). To your brother, you are just a tool. Someone to pass the time with while he is preparing to conquer some pussy. Once he has his pussy there is no need for you and you are thrown out like a used tampon. You and your brother are fundamentally different. Have…
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 02:06 AM
4

I have news for you. Almost every job a woman fills is just because of her stinky pussy. It is a cost born by all men. You think government grew so big since woman got the vote for no reason? There are lot's of make-work jobs women need to fill. Great benefits too.
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:21 PM
3

Don't blame it on the kids. That is barely nothing and even adjusted for that it does not make a difference. The largest issue is pensions and working less and working at shitty make-work jobs (many provided by the government just to keep them busy). They live longer and pay few taxes.
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 05:58 PM
1

They pay very little taxes in aggregate. They have huge healthcare costs over their life. They live several years longer than men so even though they work little and pay little into the system they get a 20 year pension. Many, many of them end up welfare throughout their life. So, combine welfare use, few hours worked, low wages, high healthcare costs, and a guaranteed pension and long life, it adds up to a lot. Add it all up together and they are a huge burden. That is why the state tries to sh…
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 05:57 PM
2

No, the best solution is to buy things with the cash. Then burn the things you buy. Why? that deprives society of the production. Money does not make a society wealthy. it is simply how wealthy is distributed. Money is basically a coupon that gives you a small % of the worlds production. Burning the end-product of production makes the world poorer.
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 08:30 AM
5

Great idea about working for the gov. Leach off the system and hasten it's decline. If possible, encourage the same behavior in coworkers. Let the gov collapse under its own weight. Live minimally (think homesteading, etc).
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 08:28 AM
3

Dividing men by race is just another way to keep us weak against the female threat, which is not divided. That is how they have convinced men and governments to give them a $100k net-benefit via government benefits throughout their life (New Zealand tax study). Let's not argue racial differences. You, a normal man, has more in common with a black man than you ever will a woman. Your experience in life, your interests in life, your genetics (Y chromosome), etc. It makes more sense to advocate you…
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 08:22 AM
13

The OP said something wrong though. The tiers is one tier exclusively for women. This includes things like female only train carriages, buses, etc. Then the other tier is for men along with women to supervise them and censor their speech.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:45 AM
2

Women have no maternal instinct. A child is only useful so long as child support or government payments are attached or it traps a man. That is truth.
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:33 AM
1

Fire her. Obviously
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:32 AM
1

Didn't you just saw like 1 hour ago you weren't watching it and it was just on the tv at the gym? Now you are watching every episode on netflix?
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:30 AM
3

Took her to dinner for six weeks. Didn't even fuck her. The guy was not dating her. He was just a meal ticket.
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:27 AM
3

It's under 15 at least in california :(
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 07:18 AM
1

Our society will collapse with more children, not less. That is what you are missing. Societies improve with less children. China implemented the one child policy and had 10% growth for 30 years. The only time prior to 1750s that a society had per-capita GDP growth basically is in europe after the black plague. The death of so many finally freed up resources the rest could use. What you are talking about is not societal collapse but the collapse of the welfare state. Yes, that could collapse bec…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:32 PM
1

This is the real rape culture.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:15 AM
1

You don't get it. There is not enough time between gender studies and other important topic to get to due process. That is lower on the priority list.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:09 AM
1

More importantly, 1880 man did nothing wrong. Men in 1880 were largely disadvantaged. They were the ones dying in the mines and many of them just got done being blown up in the civil war.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:06 AM
2

No, that is not a solution. Women can abort a child as a way to weasel out of responsibility as you put. So, there are a couple solutions for equality: 1) The man also can "abort" it and if the woman chooses to keep it, then its on her. She can also abort it too and problem solved. 2) If the woman aborts it and the man wanted the baby, then the woman owes the man financial compensation. In the same way if a man does not want it and a woman keeps it the man must "own up" to his mistake by paying …
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 05:38 AM
8

I know I for one will never forget their nature. They can change the laws, join MRA and pretend to be born again. I don't care. I saw their ugliness and have no respect for them. So, basically, even after they put on the mask and try to get men back to the plantation it will likely be a couple generations before social memory forgets who they are.
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 06:32 PM
1

Well, the very data in the OP is from a list of mostly non-western country. So, within that dataset, you are assuming that cultural bias made nearly all those country's elect more men and have more men running for parliament than women, etc. At some point I think you have to wonder if you have a delusion. It is similar to claiming women are 4" shorter than men due to a cultural bias. There are brain differences between men and women. Both in effect and in physiological structure. For example, lo…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:04 PM
1

So you think 195 country's and innumerable number of subcultures all have this same cultural bias? If that is so, then at one point do you start wondering if all society's evolved this "cultural bias" maybe it is because this cultural bias is biologically engrained or extremely beneficial to said society.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:54 PM
2

Society needs less children. Children and women who have them should be taxed. Like anything, tax behavior you want to see less of.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:18 PM
1

I want to tell her to not have kids she can't afford. Plan the baby by saving up. Women have 14 forms of birth control and abortion. Save up the PTO time. Most companies give 2-4 weeks of paid vacation and will let you have non-paid time off too. That is standard that ALL employees can have (equality). Women should be using that for choices. Just like I have to use that when I make the choice to go on an extended ski trip.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:17 PM
1

So why don't women help out by being body shields on the front lines instead of only men going to slaughter? It is the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:15 PM
2

In the most egalitarian society's such as sweden the life choice difference between men is even more pronounced than in less egalitarian societys. When women are free to choose they make very different choices.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:15 PM
1

We want true equality and having a basic understanding of gender differences we know that true equality will never produce majority female parliaments. Women do not make the life choices, take the risks, etc, that would lead to parliament in greater numbers than men. So, the only way females are majority in parliament is if there is some type of inequality in that society.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:47 AM
2

a ton of guys on here have far crossed that line of being a big fat pussy MRA is not about meeting your definition of being a pussy or not. It is not about "manning up" or any other shaming term. It is about getting EQUAL RIGHTS.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:45 AM
1

Having a wife was your decision. Don't make people with no wives or no kids pay for you and your wives decision.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:44 AM
1

It encourages more kids which the world does not need. It literally is bad policy plain and simple with no benefits to anyone but the woman abusing her coworkers.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:41 AM
1

Yes, keep up with the text. Men rights groups are very, very small. Whereas women advocacy groups are government funded, part of government (ministry of women, etc), etc. So, in comparison, men's rights groups has no voice compared to female advocacy. As such, there is no reason for MRA to focus on women's issues. Their issues are covered. It only cares about men's issues. I never said a particular gender does not advocate one way or the other.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:38 PM
1

Who said it doesn't have women on its side?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:26 PM
1

The OP was not even about generalizing. It was pointing out how women are inherently viewed as valuable to society. They simply need to be. Whereas men are only viewed as valuable for what they do. Sure, women have issues. But, this is a men's right sub. It is focused on men's issues. Women already have a LOT of tax payer funded groups focused on their issues. So much that the one small sliver that men are allowed to have does not need to give equal representation to both sides. It can only repr…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:16 PM
1

If not a body cam, record always. In fact, ALWAYS record your work day. Your boss might reveal male discrimination and that is a perfect law suit. Women changed the country with law suits. The only way to change it back is law suits.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 07:04 PM
2

There is value in re-affirming ideas. It is the basis of learning. Look at spaced repetition learning systems. So, some repetition is good even for the people who remember it. Feel free to post brand new content.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 07:03 PM
4

Women literally put on war paint everyday to manipulate you. They wear heels to manipulate you more. They dye their hair and put on pushup bras, etc. It boggles the mind that see all these forms of manipulation yet somehow think it is contained to only the physical. Women's manipulation strategy is inherent in their nature.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 07:02 PM
1

I have pointed that out to so much feminism how the "equality" report is really a supremacy report. Even with the data right in their face they saw no issue with it. It really shows that it is really about supremacy. Btw, I also showed it to non-feminist women. And they were equally unconcerned. Don't think just because a woman is not a feminist she is an ally. "Moderate" women cheer on the extremist. Which is why the extremist have such a big platform.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:58 PM
1

When one man rapes a woman all men must be taught not to rape.... Generalizations go both ways.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:55 PM
2

You are lucky. Some might say you won the lottery. You discovered the true nature of women at a cheap cost. Some men sacrifice decades and all their wealth before they discover the truth. The hard part: You must never forget the lesson. Never be convinced of NAWALT.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:49 PM
3

This post isn't actually about that. It is about pointing out the gynocentrism in society. Everyone accepts by default that men must share their resources and doing so voluntarily isn't even an option. They are required to. However, the idea that women must share resources that men value is foreign to everyone. It never would cross anyone's mind to implement what I just said even though it is equivalent to what women due to men everyday. I personally am more libertarian. This system would just b…
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:46 PM
1

True, I wish more men were into homesteading. Most people come to enjoy things like gardening, making things, etc. It is part of human nature to derive satisfaction over something they are doing when they have autonomy and something that benefits their survival. Use tax credits to put on solar panels (take from government). Get a septic system or a composte toilet, etc. And, you will eliminate all utility bills. Grow food, etc. Spending on meaningless entertainment will go way down. Bills will g…
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:38 PM
6

I agree. The problem with MRA is they need to harden their message. Only women receive things speaking softly. That is because people have sympathy for women. No one has sympathy for men. The only way to receive things is through force.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:32 PM
8

Exactly. Just like there is no social shaming of sluts there is no social shaming of kids to take care of parents. You could literally sacrifice your youth raising a few rugrats and have them move to foreign country to "find themselves" and forget about you.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 06:16 PM
1

Tha's the problem. Men need people speaking about whats best for men.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 05:01 AM
8

It reminds me of the saying "What do you call a key that opens all locks? A masterkey. What do you call a lock opened by all keys? Useless"
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 06:36 AM
1

Shouldn't think be de-factor grounds to remove the judge from office? He has shown clear bias and already admitted it in court.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:35 PM
7

What pisses me off is this is funded off the backs of men. New Zeland did a study that demonstrated the lifetime cost of women to society is $100k. That means NZ has $100k in outflows to maintain women compared to the inflows (taxes) they pay. Who is paying the difference? Men
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:46 AM
3

A dog when backed into a corner will jump at the throat of the one backing it into said corner. I don't think anyone blame a human for the same.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:43 AM
2

Especially when the women who accused harvey admitted previous behavior of manipulating for ulterior motives: providing sex for roles in hollywood. Given their documented and admitted past behavior it should not be a far fetch to assume they are also manipulating in the present for gain.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:37 AM
1

When men finally rise up make sure you join with the mob and not against the mob.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:35 AM
9

You are a straight up misogynist! There is no need for a UN Men because UN Women also addresses issues that face men. If you create a UN Men all you do is take funding away from a really great group of people doing great work for bother men and women. /s
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:32 AM
1

Agreed. The organization needs to collapse. I want the US to entirely withdraw along with every other country.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:31 AM
1

He has equated being with women as an accomplishment. He thinks MGTOWs are incels so we are impressed by it. He doesn't realize that many MGTOWs are chads who are tired of it, too. He fell into a trap and is dumb enough to think he won a prize.
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 03:47 AM
1

It's impossible to be with a woman and be "successful with women". You are foolish enough to be in a woman's trap and think that you are coming out on top.
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 03:46 AM
2

True. Men have always had a higher mortality rate. This is probably why 5% more babies are male than female to account for this.
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 03:42 AM
1

Whenever women are in trouble they blame the closest man.
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 03:34 AM
2

ALWAYS record. Your employer is always recording you. Why are you not recording your employer?
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 03:33 AM
3

Yes he does. He and his foundation is one of if not THE largest shareholder. So, he absolutely is part of microsoft. He is part of microsoft in the most direct way possible: ownership.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:15 PM
4

It is already happening. There are more women than men, especially by age 30. By the time you get into the 50s, 60s, etc, the gender imabalance (due to male deaths) is enormous. Basically, every guy who wakes up and goes MGTOW is a woman who is forced to be a cat lady. There simply is not enough men. This means more pain for the state as teh state now has to pay for the woman. It doesn't take that many guys waking up before it makes a big impact in society / culture.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 05:13 PM
20

more social programs that mostly (only) benefit women That's a bachelor tax.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:57 PM
2

Actually a big undercurrent MGTOW is tax reduction. Through a more minimalist lifestyle that values time over money and through voting out anything big government.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:56 PM
1

What stats? Like 96% of alimony is paid by men. That also affects the "family". Any family that man is responsible for in the future.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:55 PM
1

We have the data. False rape accusations are not rare. So, let's not even pretend they are rare.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:52 PM
2

Sclarett johansen is not scarlett anymore. She is already starting to hit the wall
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 05:41 PM
2

You made one mistake. When you married her YOU were not making low six figures. SHE was making low six figure because she had claim to your income. So, of course that is boring. You no longer make more than her as she has full claim to your income and thus it is her income. This new guy, it doesn't matter if he makes $1, it is still more than she gets from you because you cannot provide her anymore than she is already entitlted to since you already signed over everything you make to her.
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 05:28 PM
20

This is not rocket science. Your boss isn't "working with you". He doesn't give a shit about you or the situation you are talking about. He cares about HIS problems. YOUR problems don't mean shit to him. HIS problem is he needs X work done by Y time. As long as YOU keep solving HIS problem by picking up the extra work and working overtime, then there is no urgency, no issue. What you need to do is make YOUR problem HIS problem. The only way to do that is to cearly define your job and work and NE…
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 05:25 PM
5

Next time record the conversation. They will look for way to fire you now. You should have leverage.
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 04:16 AM
2

You are wrong. They usually earn more.
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 04:14 AM
5

Looking at #1 (yourself) is NEVER soyboy. Soyboy is looking after other people, especially women.
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 04:11 AM
3

The WHO is a fucking sham and trump should remove all funding to it. They even publish a report where they state russia is the most equal country for life expectancy because there women live 15 years longer.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:01 AM
1

Absolutely. You are not a "public business". In the same way a porn star cannot be held liable for only having sex with their opposite gendered sex.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:59 AM
4

Agree. Any rape not reported within a week (the time period that DNA evidence may be obtaniable) should automatically be counted as false and if they make it public they should be liable for slander/libel.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:57 AM
3

Here is a secret. You know how women are never honest with anybody? They literally lie about their appearance with makeup, boob jobs, etc. They are master manipulators. Well, the sad part is, they are so good at deceit and manipulation that they even fool themselves in the process.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:48 AM
9

It's amazing people simultaneously believe completely of this patriarchy boogeyman that has no evidence of existing and yet completely ignore female supremacy which is everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:00 AM
1

That's the only way to get it to stop.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:55 AM
1

Being citizen of a place does not make you part of that place. She is a british citizen perhaps, but certainly not british and never will be.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/18 03:43 AM
1

Pretty disgusting the women saved themselves before the children. I wish it was broken down by male/female children.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:30 AM
1

Exactly. Instead of realizing that they changed they think it is more likely that every man in the world changed. Hence all the "where did all the good men go" which is really translation for "Why are there not as many men hitting on me?"
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 02:08 AM
18

It shows just how screwed up the world is that what used to be the extreme (lindsay lohan) is now a voice of reason.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:47 AM
8

And LOCK THE DOOR. I have used the women's many times and it does not matter if there is 1 stall or 5 stalls inside you should always lock the door (assuming you are alone in there). This avoids any false rape accusation
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:05 PM
6

Nope, it is not a crime. In fact, some very visible people have done it an continued to do it. For example, Elizabeth Warren (the senator) claimed she is native american in order to get special advantages in university.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 06:53 PM
4

I think even they will stop marrying because it has been tainted by gays marrying, people marrying themselves, people marrying objects like cars and buildings and even a bridge, etc. They will probably have a religious ceremony, but I doubt it will be "marriage" as we know it today which includes the state.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 06:47 PM
1

The issue is that men have been trained to "man up" (which means take on any burden) and to do it in silence. Women are trained to complain about even the smallest grievances in life. Combine this with mass communication that occurred starting in the 1920s with radio and getting worse every year with newer and better forms of mass communication and you have basically elevated the platform for women to make grievances to the stratosphere. Thus, due to them constantly complaining and men not, it i…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:08 PM
1

It's deeper than the "earnings gap". There is the "benefits gap". Meaning far more federal dollars goes towards women than men. For example, in the US women live 5 years longer than men and have the same retirement age. Thus consume far more medicare and social security, which is a huge percentage of total government spending. In the UK it is even worse where women both retire earlier and live longer than men.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:50 AM
1

Let me know when you can differentiate between biology and programming.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:52 AM
1

No, it is not proven. And, logically, we can see it is not the case. A man that sacrifices his life for a woman sacrifices his genetic line. A man that saves his own life can reproduce again.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:53 PM
3

In India if a woman believes you will one day marry her and you have sex with her and do not marry her, then that is rape. Thus, his marrying her absolved him of rape because not marring her was the condition that made it rape in the first place. It disgusts how privileged men are! /s
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:49 PM
1

Men have a strong instinct that drives us to protect women Men have been propagandized to protect and serve women from birth.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:46 PM
4

I wish it were only true. It would save a lot of men if women were too focused on sex dolls to manipulate and extract resources from men.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:44 PM
1

20% of women have the most intense orgasm of their life while being raped. Far, far more get "wet" which is what is what we would consider to be the equivalent to a male's erection.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:38 AM
1

It was not just a 'stunt'. A stunt is something that is done for a few weeks. This has been ongoing in mexico for a decade. If that is the definition of a stunt, then anything can be classified as a stunt.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 04:06 PM
1

I never said it is as bad as India. I was pointing out that what you said is categorically false: my nation (Mexico) is the only one not being ravaged by the SJWs/feminists Your nation is being ravaged by feminism. What do you thing being ravaged is? It is when clueless leaders pander to populist ideas of a vocal minority such as separate train cars for women. Not even the US is that bad, yet. So, while mexico is not India, it is worse than a lot of other countries.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 04:31 AM
1

Women have a maternal instinct. What they don't have is a paternal instinct. It is the paternal instinct that protects and cares for loved ones. The maternal instinct uses people for personal gain.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 04:22 AM
2

That's the real red pill right there. No one gives a shit about you. Everyone just wants something from you. When someone is attractive they wear their value openly. Someone not attracted has to prove their value over and over again. That's life. But, never forget, you are the only one looking out for you. Take what you want in life.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 04:21 AM
2

I think there should be a more nuanced approach. There are a lot of deadbeat men. And, though very rare, some women are not. It should be that only net-contributors vote. It will have the same effect that it will be 80% male. And, it will also exclude all the soyboy faggots that never amount to anything.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 04:18 AM
1

How is it not fucked up that women have special cars? That means women can both go to the general cars and their own cars, which means public transportation better serves women (they have more access to seats and square footage due to female only cars).
/r/MensRights02/08/18 04:07 AM
1

Wasn't mexico city implementing female only cars in public transportation? Seems pretty fucked to me.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:57 AM
2

Eh, the guy caught Trump Derangement Syndrome hard and was encouraging all his listeners to be cucked by the state and vote for hilary. The guy is a tool and lost his business due to anti-trumpism.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 03:54 AM
22

He should be able to sue whoever falsely accused him for a lifetime of income
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:29 AM
2

Why did you put modern women? Historic women are no more loyal. Women in the world wars shamed men so they would die on the front lines. Women in war time sleep with the enemy.
/r/MGTOW30/07/18 07:13 PM
14

Dont' forget social media
/r/MGTOW30/07/18 07:04 PM
3

Most people who have statues are very intelligent and risk takers. Especially the latter is not something women are in general.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 12:48 PM
1

It's a fact that women do not do extraordinary feats at the same rate as men. The reason is because there are far more more male geniuses than women. So, in the intellectual sphere, they will dominate. In the physical realm, they also dominate. See how high school boys teams can often times beat female professional teams. So, given this, you would not expect nearly 50/50 representation. 5 out of 150 is probably pretty fair.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 02:24 AM
1

Yes, it is an order. You have the option not do it with a "wink". But, you know pissing off your superiors and peers is a good way to have a bad time in the military.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 09:36 PM
1

I always use the women's bathroom in this situation and treat it like a single-person bathroom. The problem is the woman's bathroom usually has two stalls, so another person can come in. Usually there is two stalls inside, but I still lock the primary door while I am in there to ensure no woman can enter and claim sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:23 PM
2

The poor girls that are robbed of male playmates
/r/MGTOW28/07/18 08:09 PM
1

Except that is not even true. Men are safer drivers. It just so happens men drive more than women and thus despite being safer are more likely to cause an accident. However, for the guy that drives 5000 miles a year, why is he being penalized because that other guy drives 75000?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:31 PM
1

Well, then if you want the same equal outcome, then you make them all unisex. Everyone gets to use the restroom as they come. No one gets a "quicker line". It's so obvious it seems to be shooshing over your head.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:49 PM
1

Equality is not about outcomes. Using that same argument should all women be paid more money even if they show up less hours? As pointed out, just make them unisex. That is equality.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:15 PM
1

It should be illegal for a woman to enter a man's restroom. There is too large of a risk that she makes a false rape allegation. Men who are in that restroom should not have to endure such a risk when they chose the correct bathroom.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:07 AM
2

Which is why the consensus among MGTOWs is NEVER cohabitate
/r/MensRights31/05/18 01:22 AM
1

Men rate 50% below average and 50% above average. In other words, exactly what you would expect. Just because a woman rates a man below average does not mean she won't date him. Women prioritize physical attraction less than a man. She will overlook it for a man that brings her money and status.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:52 AM
1

Except this phenomenon has been demonstrated. For example, women rate 80% of all men as below average. That is impossible for a brain to rate 80% of all men as below average unless that brain is designed to only consider the top of the men.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:36 PM
1

You have to understand that the bottom portion of men are literally invisible to women. Imagine you take 100 men. 40% have a bachelors degree. Now, let's compare that to 50% of women (these are made up figures). Now, remove the 30 bottom men. Suddenly, you have 40/70 have a bachelors degree. So, to a female's mind that is oblivious to the bottom portion of men, it now becomes 57% of ALL men have a bachelors degree. You can never argue with her because you are comparing different population sampl…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:45 AM
9

Women are biological wired this way. About 30% of men are completely invisible to women. This has even been demonstrated in attractiveness studies where women rate 80% of men below average. How is that possible? Well, that is possible if you literally remove the bottom of men and become completely oblivious to them. The end result of this is that women simply do not know about the bottom feeding men living on the edges. They don't exist. The only ones that exist are those top guys.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:42 AM
1

They just make it gender neutral but include subjective language such as "income disparity and wage earning potential disparity". Well, men always have more wage earning potential, so even if there is disparity no need to award alimony.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:58 AM
1

They already get something worse. Lower taxes means they pay less tax of profits. We all known women led companies receive no profits, so it is basically no change. What women already receive is subsidy regardless of profits. It's the only way such companies can survive is off the gov tit.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 04:03 AM
1

What a huge economic waste. Women are getting into huge debts, taking seats in universities that should be going to men. Instead, they are partying and living off of subsidized loans. Delaying child birth which causes far more complications for the child. Then, they graduate, and many of them do not even utilize their degree. Society has now made for their mistake multiple times. In subsidizing them, losing their productive years, children with more birth defects, and in the end it makes the who…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:59 AM
16

Exactly. How can a woman kill a clump of cells and it not be murder, but when a man does the same thing it is murder? Double standard much?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:55 AM
10

Millions of men are forced to have an abortion when their child gets aborted without their permission. And, millions more are made to be a father despite wanting an abortion.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:54 AM
1

When does the revolution start?
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 01:52 AM
1

They are actively blocking RISUG and have for decades to prevent this.
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 01:50 AM
4

I don't get it. This guy is charged for "fetal homicide" for doing exactly what millions of women do every year. It should be impossible to charge him for homicide of a non-human cluster of cells. If there is a penalty for slipping someone a pill without their knowledge so be it. But, it is literal discrimination unless they start charging women who abort as killing fetuses.
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 01:48 AM
1

Everyone who can should do rain water. Rain water is naturally soft. Does not have estrogens in it like city water.
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 01:42 AM
2

Is she a midget or is that a funky cam angle?
/r/MGTOW24/05/18 01:39 AM
16

It's pretty obvious. It is time for the men to retire. If the men produce no future income, then what is the point of being married to them? All the benefits are gone. Divorce and take half of the assets. Maybe marry another schmuck if possible and if not no loss still better than being married to the sorry ass who is no longer bringing in $$$$
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 08:11 PM
3

I remember it being debunked thoroughly beyond even "selection bias". The study did not classify between "never married", "divorced", and "married". So, basically, you would have a husband get stage 3 terminal cancer. The wife divorces him. He is now in the "single" category and brings down the stats for the "singles". When you classified between "never married" and the rest, I believe the never married actually live longer. It just shows how stats can lie.
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 08:05 PM
1

How do you ever leave the country? Nowadays it is hard to get a fake passport. They use central databases that look up info in the passport and utilize encryption to prevent tampering too. So, you get your identical passport made that is perfect in every way. But, there are no details for you in the central database. Oops. You are fucked. Or, your recorded image is different than the one on the passport. Oops, you are fucked.
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 06:52 PM
1

The lasagna was for the dude who was coming to her place later to fuck her after she gave you the lazy blow job.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 06:05 AM
5

Except the blow job was not guaranteed, so in actuality he paid for the food and got lucky with the blow job. If he wants food for a blow job, then you have to get the blow job up front.
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 06:04 AM
2

Ca you blame them? I also want all that stuff. The problem is no one gives anything to men yet men bend over backwards to give it to women.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 07:55 PM
1

I also do not advocate violence and hope there is another way. However, history shows violence is the only way to create change. Slavery was not ended with a pen. It was violence. Revolutions were not ended with diplomacy. It was violence. When one group is under the thumb of another group and wants to be liberated the oppressing group will never read their pleas. They will only respond in their own self-interest. And, usually, that is violence. The issue is that one is accustomed to incredible …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:28 AM
1

A pen and quiet words are always easier to ignore than a fist.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:12 AM
2

We have global warming. Nuke throws dust in the atmosphere causing global cooling. It's a win win.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:47 AM
3

Agreed. The change in "culture" was the result of the underlying incentive structures of society. For example, prior manual labor was the job that ruled the day. Men have an inherent advantage in this. Thus, women had ingratiate themselves to a man otherwise who else would build the cabin they lived in? The shift in society was due to a shift in rules. Now it is not manual labor that rules the day. There has been other shifting of rules. For example, the moving to highly dense urban centers. The…
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:42 AM
1

I noticed the invisible shield and the seat thing too. About a year ago I started going right to their seats and telling them to move their site so I can sit. I don't care if the cabin is empty. That is the only way they will learn. And, there are cameras on the subways, so no claiming I raped her.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:38 AM
2

Having known lots of guys who have done jail time and none of them had this prison rape problem. It seems largely to be pop culture and probably supported by the government to deter people from crime. They were all in federal prisons, so maybe state prisons are worse.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:30 AM
4

Exactly, which is why I cannot believe any man would agree to universal income. It is basically agreeing to be a provider (beta) without any of the benefits such as occasional sex and a woman who pretends to love you. Let's get it a straight. In aggregate, just like every re-distributive tax, universal income is a transfer of wealth from men to women.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:27 AM
3

Don't they literally talk about strategies to gain men's resources? It is basically just like TheRedPill how to be appealing to get laid except for RedPillWomen it is how to be appealing to steal a man's resources.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 06:25 AM
6

And the lifesaving HPV vaccine was debated for years to be given to boys and I am still not sure boys have 100% coverage.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 01:59 AM
2

Where else is she going to bang chad when your lying in bed?
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 01:55 AM
1

The sad thing is this isn't illegal in a lot of places. What is illegal is a man paying for sex. A woman can offer and market sex for money all she wants.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 01:53 AM
12

It's the perfect crime. They get all the resources and then when they cheat on him because he was "never at home" they get all the sympathy. It's an ideal situation
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 04:13 PM
3

If they got no comments it is likely that you are shadow banned
/r/MensRights06/05/18 07:08 PM
1

Agreed. It is not true at all. And, like you pointed out, no one talks about the uselessness of a woman who is > 35 years old. They literally have no use for society. Neither being strong or particularly intelligent and having no reproductive value.
/r/MGTOW06/05/18 07:05 PM
3

That's a disgrace! How do we get it to 0%? Women should never have to die on the job. That is why we have males! /s
/r/MGTOW06/05/18 06:59 PM
5

Now there are different standards, so there are no longer just marines. There are marines and the lesser female marines. They get paid the same.
/r/MGTOW06/05/18 06:54 PM
3

Men don't have voting rights even today. They can only vote if registering for the draft and thus it is a privilege and not a right.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 07:24 PM
2

Women are co-evolved parasites. A parasite is never for the benefit of the host.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 02:43 AM
6

Did anyone else notice when she listed why he is an amazing guy she listed "great job" first. The literal only thing that has nothing to do with the guy as a person.
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 07:24 PM
22

Because society is built for women and women do not make decisions based on facts. They make decisions based on following key people in a herd mentality.
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 02:33 AM
2

WIth 70 million men forced to go MGTOW it creates the culture that enables the other men to feel okay about going MGTOW too. Seems great for men.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 06:53 PM
1

You have to understand she was probably abused or tempted by a male. So, when women are violent it is actually proxy male violence because men are really the puppeteers controlling the strings. If there were no men, then women would live in a utopia.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 06:52 PM
11

It is more to do with their nature. The female's role is to be a parasite and not productive. That is how they evolved. It is like asking why a hippo does not climb trees like a monkey. That is not what they are evolved to do.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 06:42 PM
–

India is lost as a country. The men really should abandon ship
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:11 AM
2

If she is disabled, then certainly people should give her the seat. However, you did not say disabled. You said pregnant. They are not one and the same. A woman can be pregnant with a huge stomache and very able to stand. I mean, if she is taking the bus she is also walking places, if she is grocery shopping she is standing / walking the whole time, etc. So, by doing this activity, unless she physically looks weak other than carrying an extra 25 pounds of weight, it can be assumed she is healthy…
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 07:12 PM
1

It is only womanspreading if it inconveniences another women. Otherwise, she is justified. Men can stand /s
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 06:56 PM
1

Most male billionaires created their own company. Look at zuckerberg, bill gates, warren buffet, etc.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 06:26 PM
2

Chads are basically the top 10% of guys. It is not always the same guys. My guess is that 30% of guys find themselves in the top 10% of guys at some point in their life. Basically everyone will find themselves in the bottom 90% at some point in life too.
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 07:17 PM
6

No, it won't affect their opportunities. Because their opportunities are codified in law.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 07:42 PM
18

All women should be single.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 03:32 PM
10

Also, having less real interaction with people makes people less empathetic.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 02:15 AM
1

so.. how many of u have stabbed a potential brother in the back? keep it real. A man with a girlfriend / wife is not a brother. He has already chosen his side.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 01:19 AM
20

You have to understand that women WANT to help, but they are held back by the patriarchy. So, the men sacrificing themselves to help people is actually a sigh of more female abuse.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 01:14 AM
2

Men are accustomed to direct communication, so oftentimes take what women say at face value because that is the communication of men.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 07:29 PM
5

Exactly. You save money. The problem is this implies you are not giving resources to a woman. And THIS is the problem. It is a very, very big problem when a man is not giving resources to a woman.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 07:00 PM
1

Women use kids as a weapon against their husbands. They say women love children. It is not true. Women love the resources that children guarantee. A lioness will let a new dominant lion kill her children to secure a place in his pack. Human women are no different.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 06:51 PM
3

He is in denial. He lost his attraction for his wife and cannot admit it to himself.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 06:49 PM
8

Math is an invention of the patriarchy and it is a social construct. It is all meant to hold women back. Bridges can be built with feeling and feminine maths. Not that patriarchal bullshit.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 06:42 PM
2

You have to understand that women are co-evolved parasites. Their evolutionary strategy, like all parasites, is extracting resources from a host. So, the "value" of her "husband" is his resources. When he leaves she does not miss the husband, but the resources he provided. And, crying about lost resources does not bring money in the door however fucking a new guy might. That is why you see this behavior.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 06:30 PM
–

Why would this not just encourage people to abort their female children? We can already see a bias for male children in places like China. It seems that this just increases that bias. I know I would be very worried about having a daughter. Better to have a son.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 06:06 PM
4

I have also thought long and hard about this. Fortunately I have never been put in a situation like that. But, if someone made my life such a living hell I was going to commit suicide I would think about how to have some justice before going.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 06:02 PM
15

Or just go dutch which is equality
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:54 PM
3

Honestly, I just nodded my head because I don't really care. I knew she was AWALT this was just evidence of what I already knew. My guess is every other guy just nodded their head too, which is why she thinks guys actually buy ridiculous stories like that.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 12:37 AM
1

That does not affect the birth ratio of men and women. I feel like I am talking to an idiot here, so I am checking out. Peace.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:32 PM
1

Uh... no. This is a Biology 101 fail. I already proved the point. You seem to be just repeating specious arguments. If women were deemed more valuable, then there would be more women born. You seem to have a myopic viewpoint. Differences between genders are more than sperm and eggs. Certainly eggs are more valuable. However, a woman is not an egg and a man is not sperm. They each bring more than those items that contribute to survival of the species.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:21 PM
1

My belief is that it is not biological at all. Boys are conditioned from youth to serve women in this way. Look at disney movies where the man saves the damsel. Human biology doesn't really favor women or men. Hence why the birth rate is 50/50. They are deemed equally valuable. The man who sacrifices himself loses his ability to pass on his genes. So, man A sacrifies himself for woman B. Man C who did not sacrifice himself now impregnates woman B. Man C is who won evolutionarily. So, I cannot se…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:11 PM
4

There is a huge war death gap. I think women should exclusively be on the front lines for at least the next few hundred years to make up for this historic oppression.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:07 PM
1

I have had a lot of casual hookups on tinder. But, in general, it's a waste of time. Women on tinder are the most hypergamous. The rule is the guy has to fuck a girl below him in looks. There are exceptions to this of course, but it's rare when it happens.
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 09:41 PM
11

I would move or die. At what point do you say nah, not going to move this is my home. And instead take up arms against those people with a boot against your throat?
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 05:12 PM
–

Are you saying you don't #BelieveHer? You sound like a misogynist!
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:06 PM
2

Do single men have different standards to adopt than single women? If so it sounds like a good case for a lawyer
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 05:04 PM
5

No, no, you are understating it. Keep flailing men and they will join the invading hordes.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 04:56 PM
2

Because being > average is the whole damn point. A woman cannot go brag to her friends and feel important if her boyfriend is "average". That is what hypergamy is. It is an incessant drive of women to expect above average in every single category, no matter what.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 09:27 PM
5

A lot of guys had mothers that 1) abandoned them 2) forced their fathers to abandon them via the court system. That is what redpills a lot of MGTOW guys. Why should a MGTOW support a mother who did that to them?
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 07:55 PM
2

The jobs of these men will be bringing the revolution when men have had enough
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 04:15 PM
1

They get with them in a pump and dump manner, but not in the manner these women really seek (companionship). It is mathematically impossible for women to have a husband each. There are more women than men! As such, women are in competition. Then exclude the 80% of men that are invisible and it becomes a real problem. And, a certain % of men will want their own kids, which really makes it so young men won't be pursuing a woman > 35.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:54 PM
1

You sound like you will eventually succumb to the addiction for women that society has given to you. So, when you do fall on the sword, I hope you will at least do it in a way to minimize your risk: 1) Only be with a woman who has higher career prospects / wealth than you 2) don't pay for their shit 3) keep your assets separate unless it is in your benefit
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:51 PM
1

No, it is worse than that. It is pay me for "work" that I have invented that actually costs other people time and money.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:47 PM
2

Why are you linking to this skank? This just earns her money
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:27 PM
3

Women in units causes more men to die because men will try to protect the woman. If you ever are in a situation where bullets start flying remember you owe yourself safety before anyone else.
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 09:25 PM
2

I don't really know. Part of it may be porn. There is a LOT of porn that is multiple guy porn, so that may play some part of it.
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 08:18 PM
54

You can't get more deadbeat than a parent who kills their own child
/r/MGTOW26/03/18 10:52 PM
4

Laws are enforced by men and as a result there is a limit to the amount women can oppress men because women need the men to enforce the laws. When the pendulum swings in the direction there is no natural limiter to how oppressive the laws can be.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:33 PM
1

You are right. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:54 PM
1

You can also fit a japanese bidet lid on that for heated seats and a bidet
/r/MGTOW26/03/18 07:30 PM
1

It ultimately becomes a race to the bottom. Everyone races to do the least work possible because that reduces their stress, gives them more free time, and it does not affect their pay at all. Hence why we have had a productivity plateau since teh 1970s
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:04 PM
28

In addition, on average, men pay women $150,000 over the lifetime of the woman in taxes. The whole system is a fraud where women are harvesting the productivity of men.
/r/MGTOW26/03/18 05:44 PM
2

Are you going to financially support your mother in old age?
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 11:14 PM
14

Keep in mind, this is how she works with fake hair, fakeup, facials and skin treatments, etc. This is probably the guys natural appearance. So, imagine what she looks like naturally.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 02:39 AM
1

There are TONS of good women. I am not even the one who said I hate women. I simply pointed out that disliking a group for group level characteristics is okay. It is when that dislike transfers to individuals of the group that there is a big problem. Not sure why you are taking a pissy tone with me.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:40 AM
1

Does commenting about positive aspects of men really trigger you that much? Maybe you should head over to two x chromosones
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:34 AM
1

Being blind would be ignoring group characteristics and pretending like there are not group characteristics. Men, as a group, definitely have problems. They also, as a group, are the intellectual, creative, and productive fountains of humanity. So, when analyzing the group you would look at them holistically the good and the bad. And, hopefully, would support a culture and ideas that improved the individuals of that group and thus the characteristics of the group as a whole to be improved.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:08 AM
3

What you have to understand is that feminist believes in equality between the genders and mens rights. It is just coincidence that all the feminists on tv, shouting from microphones, writing books, etc, are man hating, sexist, compassionless shells of people. Those aren't the real feminists. /s
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:02 AM
1

Not really. Hating individuals due to group characteristics is wrong. Hating a group for group characteristics is of course not wrong. What you are basically saying is that it is morally wrong to draw a judgment against a group. What you are saying makes no sense. Do you dislike ISIS? That is a group with group characteristics that is being judged. Maybe we should not pass judgment on them? You can see where I am going with this. It is nonsensical to attempt to make wrong passing judgment on a g…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 07:32 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with hating a group for group characteristics. What is wrong is hating an individual for characteristics of a group until determining if that individual also has the group characteristics.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 06:53 PM
6

You make a good point. "Fakeness" is a female characteristic. As society becomes more gynocentric we lose male characteristics like truth, nobility, honor, etc and they get replaced with female characteristics like fakery. Basically, the Political Correctness movement is a reflection of society adopting female ideals.
/r/MGTOW24/03/18 06:39 PM
4

If he was not married, then there would not be a victim here. It is only sad he lost his life because some woman will be disadvantaged by no longer having his resources.
/r/MGTOW24/03/18 06:37 PM
7

But who cares? Don't make it about the gender. Just make a law that any couple can retire at the same time as long as one is 65 years old and the other is at least 60. Or, you know, just make the ages equal so no one in society is subsidizing other people.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:02 AM
6

Wow, I would do this if the laws were like that in my country. Insanity.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 07:16 PM
11

Yes. Why would you use a spoon over a fork? They both equally suited for the job of eating soup. If you believe otherwise it is because you are a bigoted utensilist!
/r/MGTOW21/03/18 03:53 PM
2

I have seen multiple guys who have endured divorce rape 3 times. Manginas are fucking idiots.
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 06:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter