TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Oogamy Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Oogamy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is something I often talk about, the way a man's arousal or lack thereof is obvious, and a woman's is not. We can't easily tell if a woman is physically aroused or not, and this seems to often result in people thinking it doesn't actually matter that much. I think that what your comment is missing is a statement along the lines of "Physical arousal is not sexual consent, just because a man has an erection doesn't mean he is consenting to sex, and just because a woman is wet doesn't mean she…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 12:53 PM
5

Could you please provide a citation for the study you reference. I'm actually interested in it for real.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 12:30 PM
6

You cannot pre-arrange consent. Consent is an in-the-moment thing, and anyone who's actually had sex should understand this if they care about not raping their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 05:56 PM
6

Please do!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:27 PM
3

Seeing a hot guy and getting horny for him and then fucking him does not mean the sex will necessarily be enjoyable. Sexually desiring someone does not guarantee the sex will be enjoyable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:18 PM
4

Manstrology
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:13 AM
-1

No, it is a barely thought through attempt at a gotcha. You prefer to frame it as though women have refused to register for selective service when the reality is that women are NOT ALLOWED to register. Real slimy stuff actually to deny this reality. Slimy step 1: disallow women from registering for selective service. Slimy step 2: claim that women not registering means they shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Do you think people are so stupid that they can’t see the slimy disingenuousness here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 05:46 AM
2

Obviously, no source provided for this nonsense cause you pulled it out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:55 AM
4

Sounds like it good then that women aren't mating with these men who are only here because their grandmothers weren't free. Sounds like a needed correction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 07:37 AM
9

Rape has caused far more health problems, suicidality, infertility etc., it has ruined far far more lives than failure to get laid ever has, and yet rapist men continue to rape. They have continued to rape even being able to see actual real world non-hypothetical damage it does. Heck, that’s the reason for a lot of the raping to begin with - to cause that damage. Yet here you are getting all worked up because women here immediately reject your hypothetical proposal of offering themselves up for …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:49 PM

It's fine for the stepdad and is evolutionarily advantageous actually. At least you're not using the 'step dads are more likely to abuse and murder kids who aren't their own' argument that so many evopsychos like to use. Time is a resource, no need to say "resources AND time". Humans are naturally polygnandrous, it is by far the most evolutionarily sound "strategy", and all you addlepates need to find a way to accept this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:27 PM
3

The judgement IS the "consent exchange" though it's not an exchange, it's just her deciding. The part where your argument fails is when you keep insisting that if she decides "no" she necessarily labels that guy a creep and objectifier and you don't know that unless.you're a mind reader.​ You assume they think "creep" because you have low self esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:10 PM
2

Of all the restaurants men could go to, they choose the one where women are using their bodies to manipulate men into giving them money. I thought men hated women who use them for money with no intention of getting physical with him? Hmm, or maybe the men customers and women workers in that scenario are grown up enough to understand that nearly everyone with a job wouldn't put up with having to do the work for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:55 PM
2

> But only one of those gets called a boundary. The other gets called cheap. Lol pretending that a woman with such a boundary wouldn't be derided as a "gold digger" is laughable. 🤪
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:17 PM

I think that, thanks to the internet, the single guys have started using the lines that married/partnered guys have always used. Like, they read a bunch of threads where married men were talking about how they totally need sex to feel love, and they didn't realize this line really only works for men who have an already committed sex partner. "I feel love through sex" is what you say to the woman you already committed to in order to try to get her to put out. Usually single guys trying to get in …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 01:22 AM
4

I think the expectation would fluctuate depending on the answer to: How much sex would you be having relative to financial outlay if you were single?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:55 PM
2

who is "our"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:30 AM

It's the internet, social media, the ability to hear what every idiot is saying and thinking all the time. Women been hearing what y'all been saying. It's like when your favorite celebrity started a podcast and you realized they were stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 02:02 AM

Women generally can't get horny for people they resent. The new guy hasn't been around long enough to do shit that makes her resent him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:37 AM
3

jerkoff hand motion, zerbert noise
/r/ExRedPill26/05/25 03:28 AM
15

F'ing Baumeister. I'd say that he is in large part responsible for the spread of redpill ideology. He was lead author of the highly influential "Sexual Economics" paper (pdf full text), published in 2004. From the wiki page: Sexual economics theory (SET) is a highly controversial hypothesis found in the field of evolutionary psychology. The theory purports to relate to how male and female participants think, feel, behave and give feedback during sex or relevant sexual events. ... Baumeister's pr…
/r/ExRedPill26/05/25 03:17 AM

It's more just a sexist double standard that these men have, and which they think is fully justified, than it is plain old hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:22 PM
2

Or is it because No, it's because of the thing Perfect-Resist said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 08:04 AM
1

The irony of you thinking the "if" makes a difference, while lecturing others to be sure to 'communicate clearly'. I think the problem is that women don't speak weasel, but you seem fluent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 08:00 AM
3

I refuse to believe you're an editor if you can't even get your subject/verb agreement correct in this sentence.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/24 05:31 AM
1

Some Sarah Blaffer Hrdy: Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding Father Time: A Natural History of Men and Babies This one isn't out yet, so I haven't read it but it sounds interesting: In Father Time, Hrdy brings her expansive curiosity, humility, and deep expertise to bear on one of the questions that drive culture wars: What does it mean to be a man today? She takes readers along on a journey of discovery that challenges even her own understanding of gender and ca…
/r/ExRedPill15/04/24 04:29 AM
19

You're going to pull a muscle with this ridiculous stretching you're doing here. "So I should feign interest in blahblahblah" Obnoxious. I didn't say shit about what you should do. I said you have to lead with personality. If literally everything that would let you show personality and allow for audible verbal exchanges is something you'd have to fake interest in then.... well then nothing, you're just obviously full of shit. You're bragging about taking COOKING CLASSES for fucks sake. That's ex…
/r/ExRedPill09/04/24 08:11 PM
13

If you're ugly, people advise book club wine tasting type shit because you'll have to lead with personality. You showing up at the club being ugly and trying to yell over loud music at women you find hot to "get to know them" will never work. I'm old and have banged tons of ugly guys over my years. They're often the best lays. You're not even trying to share that with the world by going ugly to clubs.
/r/ExRedPill09/04/24 02:19 PM
8

Oh thank you for the early Christmas gift! 15 or so years ago I would google around looking for feminists who were talking about the MRAs and evo psych. Was anybody pushing back on what was being said? Were there any feminists countering Baumeister with Blaffer-Hrdy was basically what I was looking for. Didn't find anything like that happening. Closest thing was Amanda Marcotte complaining about evo psych being terrible because "it says women are just whores" and how very dare they insult women …
/r/ExRedPill24/11/23 11:17 PM
2

The "wall" is actually the wall of a prison, when you "hit it" you'll scale it and launch yourself over it to freedom. Your sense of self will grow newer stronger roots on the other side. I'm 51, your 30s will be the best time of your life. So far.
/r/ExRedPill08/03/23 11:48 PM
2

I was getting at the idea of children inheriting the property of parents, and how certainty of paternity is very important in that regard, and how that may have effected human's natural strategies. There are some theories that say paternity uncertainty is actually way more evolutionarily advantageous, and they don't sound crazy to me. Sarah Blaffer Hrdy has written some about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:29 AM
5

Gosh, what if it turns out we're wrong about one or the other sexes' strategy and the design was far more compatible but humans just muddled it all up with their insecurities and assumptions and inheritable property laws?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter