TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OozlumConcorde Archive

View 1 post and 88 comments by OozlumConcorde on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
132

Social IssuesOozlumConcorde/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

because I would need to do a whole bunch more research into this to feel confident that I knew what I was talking about.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 09:57 PM
21

So this is a personal rambling rather than any kind of scientific assessment. Please take with a grain of salt, as if a drunk guy came up to you in the pub and said "I reckon". It basically comes down to the phrase "End Violence Against Women and Girls", which lots of institutions have taken as a goal. It's a noble goal, but one which is unachievable if you think rape is a moral failing on the part of each individual rapist. Even if we (for example) doubled the sentances and policing resources r…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 09:42 AM
3

So, setting aside the content of the wheel (the words on it) I fail to see how it being a wheel is better than it being a list or a grid. Like, in what way is being obsese "opposite" to being unable to speak english? How is Marital status next to Race? The geometry of this graphic isn't working with what it's trying to show. The core concept, that circumstances of birth can make peoples lives harder, is obviously and blatantly true. Also not something I had to learn from a poster
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:51 PM
18

Torys were much of a muchness. This is what happens when we decide one particular cartegory of crime (terrorism is where it started) is worth suspending civil liberties for, government will try to wrap as much as possible into that category to expand their powers. The wars on terror, drugs, organised crime, human trafficking etc... were hardly successes, but we still try to carry over the same doctrines that fought those wars because real solutions are slow, expensive and unpopular.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:46 PM
2

It's an overblown news story, but given how little coverage greens get most people know him as "That guy who apparantly told a client he could use hypnotherapy to expand her breasts." https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/zack-polanski-green-party-hypnotherapy-b2819071.html His actually policies are obviously not about that.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 09:33 AM
4

I mean here in the UK labour has a generic white man, Conservatives have gone through three female leaders in the last five minuites, and the leftmost party (greens) just elected the "Breast Expansion Hypnotherapist Guy", so I'm not sure your diagnosis is completely universal.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:29 AM
3

This is a complete schizo-post. Setting aside the desire or motivational questions behind if sex-bots could 'replace' real women: if you can build tailored humanoid sex bots, you can build tailored humanoid worker bots. Why the hell would anybody employ you, joe shlub, if there exists something: Humanoid, Intelligent enough to hold a conversation, Durable enough to survive simulated sex, Strong enough to move independantly, Cheaper than a hireling, Customisable enough to be anything from petite …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:10 PM
9

it would be really helpful if you could actualle cite the study, these graphics are entirely meaningless without a methodology to read through.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 08:45 PM
0

Every country had massive fiscal problems after covid, seems hard to pin it on biden specifically
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:35 AM
12

Republicans are as fiscially irresponsibly as democrats, it's just a question of your money going towards missile contracts for billionaires or sex-ed in gamiba.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:26 PM
2

> Men are still expected to be held to the standards of consent, uhh, maybe we ought to keep that gender role?
/r/MensRights14/04/25 10:02 PM
1

"Evil begins when you treat people as things" - I.e. Use them as means to ends rather than ends in-and-of-themselves. Feminists focus on sexual objectification, which is real. The issue is that they ignore is all other forms of objectification. When you order a pizza, you are treating the Pizza delivery boy as an object, as a thing which is useful for moving pizza from one point to another. From this example we can see how difficult building a society without objectification is. When pressed on …
/r/MensRights21/02/25 10:27 AM
1

Women had a cultural movement to lessen the burdens of their gendered expectations. "Slut shaming" is the female equivelent to the male stigma on vulnearability, because unfaithfulness compromised the traditional role of women (homemaker). Meanwhile vulnearability is seen to compromise the traditional roles of manhood (breadwinner, warrior). Lesbianism doesn't require any more vulnearbility =that straight sex requires, and isn't any more unfaithful than sleeping with a man, hence why it isn't as…
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:04 PM
13

I didn't say "ban it" I said "maybe teach kids about some of the downsides.", what exactly is your issue with that?
/r/MensRights08/02/25 02:07 PM
17

The average age for first porn exposure is between 11 and 12, are women supposed to be taking care of our 'needs' at that point? I'm not trying to demonise porn, but I do feel like there's a healthy suspicion to be had. Neither The porn industry nor current feminist orthodoxy is going to offer that view point.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:58 PM
2

we know, but still you got to learn to context switch. This is a public forum, when normal people turn up and see "That's gay lol", they come away with a certain impression, y'know?
/r/MensRights08/02/25 12:23 PM
2

"The demographic of" ..?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 07:24 PM
1

How will the existance of a sexbot help you "control your biology"?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:58 AM
1

the existance of a multi-billion dollar porn industry already signals what your hypothetical sex-bot crowdfunding is supposed to. It has the added benefit of not being a crowdfunded sexbot research project.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:51 AM
-2

"Posting my fantasies of having a barefoot, pregnant, state-forced kitchen slave on main will definately further the cause of mens rights" - OP
/r/MensRights01/02/25 11:00 AM
-1

The headline is clearly misleading, starmer did not blame "young men in their bedrooms", he classified the attacker Axel Rudakubana as a young man in his bedroom. Perhaps that classification is vague and unhelpful, but it's still not like Kieth is blaming me for anything.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 09:54 AM
3

I would be worried about introducing punishments simply because most false-allegations are revealed as false by the admission of the woman. We don't want to create a scenario where a woman, after making a false allegation, can't back down for fear of going to jail. The best solution is what it always has been "innocent until proven guilty", this goes for both the potential perpurtrator a d victim. If courts haven't they evidence to prove things either way, then they must walk away from the situa…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 12:24 AM
5

"Someone else will do it"
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:21 PM
8

Raising a Child on a single income stream would still be horrible.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:19 PM
10

not tnis exactly, but labours manifesto was expressly feminist: https://labour.org.uk/change/take-back-our-streets/#vawg https://labour.org.uk/change/break-down-barriers-to-opportunity/#respect idk, there's worse ways for the government to waste money I guess.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:50 AM
4

This is exactly how lynching was justified. People deserve a fair trial, otherwise every rapist you kill with be accompanied by innocent men.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:28 PM
41

Extrajudicial killings, as we know, are only ever conducted by the best justified, sanest and most rightous members of the community.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:15 PM
0

No, I am british
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:01 PM
161

"Journalists"
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:53 PM
6

bros just mad he got ratio'd in the neighbouring comment thread.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 07:38 AM
2

I feel like this is more a r/KotakuInAction post than a r/MensRights one. What right is at stake here?
/r/MensRights04/10/24 01:36 PM
1

the norms include half the bad stuff this sub complains about, like male disposeability. the norms haven't stayed the same for millenia, when was the last time you complimented a woman on her spinning?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:36 PM
8

Because the stated goals of feminism today are not attainable targets. I.e. "End rape in a single generation" That isn't something you can do by telling men rape is wrong. Rapists know that, they rape anyway. Yet feminists also can't admit that educational these education campains have no clear end goal, so the answer they arrive at each and every year is "we aren't teaching kids about womens issues enough, just a little more and we will surely end violence against women and girls". Female-centr…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 11:08 PM
1

We could crouch if that helps?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:39 PM
24

unless many women are "not single" with the same guy... ;-) That's one source of disparity, but another can be seen in the qualifiers, "most YOUNG men are single most YOUNG women are not." That effect can also occur by women dating older men. This is a pretty common thing, and also self-perpetuating (if all the 26 year old women are dating 30 year old men, all the 26 year old men date 22 year old women.) Eventually the buck stops with 22ish men, because they don't want to be pedophiles.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:24 PM
9

I read the article down to the account-wall, and yeah the writing is pretty bad. But would like to just defend the headline though. Lonliness =/= can't get dates. Isn't that one of the key talking points of the male lonliness argument, that it goes beyond 'inceldom'? People's social needs are more complicated and expansive than pairbonding alone, hunter gatherers lived in large(150-ish) yet closely knit tribes, modern humans are lucky to make a couple friends at one job before they have to move …
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:18 PM
2

Or, in otherwords: Your answer to u/Level5Clearance 's question (what system other than capitalism?) is "an imagined future system". Good to know, that is at least an answer, not necessarily a bad one. Questioning systems can be good, indeed it is necessary if we are to improve them. That being said, if your solution to mens issues is "the futuretm" you (to my mind) aren't taking the problems seriously. Either you believe men are disadvantaged in some specific, measurable, tangible way (I.e. in …
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:36 PM
2

*false trichotomy. And no, it's kind of not, you have blamed mens issues on capitalism, that is a positive claim. You are presenting no specific alternative to capitalism. No observed system in recent history, not militarism, not manoralism, not european social democracy, not theological puritanism, not academia... actually values men (or women, for that matter) formost for their "humanity, individuality, kindness, generosity, and creativity." From the perspective of anyone not already versed in…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 10:39 PM
1

"Just pay the indulgence bro"
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:35 PM
3

See, I agree with you. If there's only one lifeboat I'll quickly get to the back of the queue. At yet I can't really justify it logically. I don't know why I've got that attitude, if I can't why I would do it how do I know it's not societal pressure, low self-esteem, or some ev-pysch bullshit?
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:05 PM
3

It's not so much the mere knowing of the parentage I'm worried about. It's that you cannot guarentee -when giving the state a power- that it will use it properly. What do you do when the 'anti-vaxxers' of the world refuse to comply with the tests. Fine them? Have police hold them down and ram the swab into their mouth? When overworked hospital staff are under a time crunch, do you want them to fufill their legal requirements to avoid being repremanded even if it would take away from genuinely ne…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:54 AM
1

Yes. This was the point I was trying to make but I think a lot of people are taking me seriously here. Also: Paternity tests are not perfect. Genetic testing is in theory, but in practice mistakes, which can be as simple as getting the samples switched, occur. This will go doubly for some kind of government program, which will go to the lowest bidder. Mandatory testing will lead to thousands of false negatives (and hence, broken homes) every year. A man should have a right to one, at least if he…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 06:38 PM
31

Bad policy imho. literally "if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to worry about."
/r/MensRights13/01/24 10:54 AM
4

It's definately good advice to care less about others opinions of you. It's just there's so many more positive ways to phrase this: "If you find me sexy that's a you problem." "Compliment my brain not my boobs!" "Men can get boners from JPEGS and MP4 files so why should I care?" Idk, it's just so very vulgar to jump to necro-fauno-pedo-phillia to spurn unwanted advancements.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 01:07 AM
21

Feminists 1923: Gib vote or your house get explote :D Feminists 2023: They made fun of my $6 coffee :'(
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:47 PM
1

Note: "Not be fat" is now supposed to be optional.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:57 AM
1

I can completely undertsand why people would be against Ukrainian conscription. What I'm not sure I get is why this sub never seems to lambast Russian conscription efforts, which are just as much of a breach of mens rights, and without which the Ukrainian conscription would be entirely unnecessary.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:51 AM
1

Insulting? yeah, it's a reminder of how male strangers might as well be monsters to most people. Ultimately though, I understand the utility of it. I don't really begrudge women for wanting it. So long as men still have access to regular train compartments we aren't particulararly put out by it, and it does make women safer.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:44 AM
1

I really hope you're a bot
/r/MensRights23/08/23 08:02 PM
1

what's next, a license to toast toast in my own damn toaster?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:41 PM
17

Honestly it's a very reasonable concern. If women across society are doing more than their fair share of chores without any just recompense, that's definately something worth complaining about. The problem is it's hard to properly assess unpaid labour. A lot of studies in the area just rely on self-reporting, and the exact value of a given hour of unpaid labour is hard to figure out. For example: a recent trend among feminist columnists is the idea of "unpaid emotional labour", that women exert …
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:03 PM
6

wasn't it supposed to be 80/20 five years ago? Like even granting some level of 'hypergamy', it reaches an equillibrium point. If women genuinely didn't bother with the bottom 95%, then any women could shop down to the 94th percentile and pick from literally dozens perfectly loyal guys.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:27 AM
8

Mankind might go extinct by then, but it won't be cuz of the dating market. If for no other reason than the amish (and other werid traditionalist sub-groups like them) still pump out babies like it's 1875
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:23 AM
4

Don't breakup with your long-term friends because people on reddit who read three paragraphs about them told you to. ...That being said, have you tried becoming a flat-earther and responding to their "anti-patriarchal" comments by blaming lizards until they all become too uncomfortable to make such comments?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:56 PM
1

We sometimes get shit for still caring about starwars/RC planes/mountain bikes/whatever at 45, but personally I think that being able to simply have fun and enjoy life so easily is an important trait.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:02 AM
2

The thing is though, for a lot of them, the level of unsafe they felt before was far in excess of what the actual risks were. If this helps women feel like they're "taking back control somehow" and thus stops them accusing every guy crossing the street of stalking it's probably for the best.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 09:35 PM
1

... what is her 'reasoning' here?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:40 PM
2

There's truth to this, but it's also overly simplistic. You've got to remember that along with doubling the workforce, you also increase (though not double) the demand for labour. Households need more cars for commuting, more labour saving measures to replace the homemaker (ready meals, dishwashers, tumble driers etc...) seperate income streams also lead to a lot more consumerism, be it divorced women buying romance novels or 'incels' like me buying more warhammer. The workforce was also never q…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 11:26 AM
3

(Naturally with exceptions for children, the very elderly, disabled and other people who can't meaningfully contribute to the war effort.)
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:34 PM
3

USA-ians when canadians try to talk about their politics for five seconds unapposed:
/r/MensRights25/05/23 08:54 PM
2

I sometimes think the problem is often particularly bad for mens-rights because the more extreme commenters aren't actually allowed their own space. If you ban r/incels, r/mgtow, r/corrgeeluvkillingwoms etc... then the refugees kind of have to come here.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 09:14 PM
3

Or literally just a fridge and a marker pen. I doubt the governments doing it as a surveillence scheme though, they probably just wanted to award a lucrative contract to sombodies neice/nephew.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 10:59 AM
3

"body language expert" (also known as "a quack".) That's not to say you should go around murdering husbands of course.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 07:20 PM
5

^^Skill issue
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:35 PM
-2

Ah yes beacuse "us typicals" is such a flattering descption..? The great-word-chase is a big waste of time, and one of the worst things to come out of the culture war. You hate cis because of the connotations people give it, and if "typical" replaced cis, people would give it the same connotations and you'd hate it just as much.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 08:19 PM
3

So personally I think we should remove sales tax from tampons & sanitary pads, however.... Soap is 100% linked to healthcare and inherent biological functions, it's probably the second most important heathcare innovation after sewers.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 08:53 PM
3

Something being rare doesn't mean it's nothing to worry about. If you're a promiscuous in the sorts of areas were this is still a problem then it might well be one of the biggest issues in your life, just as water quality isn't something to worry about... unless you live in flint michigan. Of course, if you're not in thoose areas, there is an impluse to go "Well what do you want me to do about it?" Which might be what you're experincing. There's a natural frustration with people asking you to so…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:03 PM
0

I mean, there aren't any easy solutions, that's why people lie. Even here though, the problem is the dishonesty, rather than the high sex drive. Men who say "honestly I just want a shag" are better for women than men who waste time with relationships they don't intend to follow through with. Perhaps if it weren't for cultural shaming, men might be more likely to fall in the first category than the second. Same as with promiscuous women, if people would stop slut-shaming. Then there'd be far less…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:47 AM
3

Not just americans mind, plenty of places have cultures of shame around too much / too little / incorrect sex. I guess it must've made sense for apes desperately following evolutionary protocol, but here in the 21st century we really ought to put it bed, for men and women alike.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:41 AM
1

Setting aside for a moment the general ickyness and pitfalls that come with discussing "disgenic effects", since they have been talked about extensively, and much more eloquently than I could put it here. Neither being old, sick nor rich necessarily makes your "genetic stock" any worse than the general populations. Old people have more or less the same DNA they did when they were born, and since we're taking social darwinisim for granted here, I'll point out that wealthy bloodlines have already …
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:18 AM
22

Ditch the if, but yeah.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:56 AM
7

Well, because it's a fantasy (albiet an unhealthy one). Same goes for why Black Widow is played by Scarlett Johansson and not me in a dress.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:52 PM
2

I don't think China would have a problem there, back in more hard-line communist days they basically brute-forced a 50% gender ratio in a lot of traditionally male professions. Even today about 40% of engineers in china are female, whereas in the west, even with all our various programmes, we can't really get above a quarter of engineers being female in new classes. That being said, China doesn't have the same culture war issue we in the west do, they also aren't massive fans of lesbians and cur…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:17 AM
0

How about each partner take responsibility for their own pleasure and not blame eachother? I mean, I am a virgin, but this sounds like a bad system. If it's not going to be a collaborative effort in which both parties are interested in the wellbeing of each other just as much as they are of themselves why wouldn't I just keep on masturbating?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:14 PM
17

I mean, building a city is, in fairness, pretty hard. You need a lot of upfront labour, land, capital, probably permissions from your regional government etc... Of course, there's never been much interest in this idea (or it's gender-reversed counterpart) because it's dumb as all heck.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:02 PM
1

why not listen to an (admittedly hyperbolic) feminist talk about it, instead of asking a bunch of MRA? but more to the point, why should it matter? Either laws are right or wrong, why people want them does not factor into that. The only reason to psychoanalyse a vague collective of people like this is to find more reasons to hate them, you don't need that trouble in your life.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:58 PM
0

The classics are good and all but you don't need to diss my childhood like that :/
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:40 PM
2

Boris has proven time and time again that he thinks nothing of lying. Any sane person should have some serious doubts in the ardent feminsim of a man who could fill a mini-bus with single mothers and abandoned children.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:48 PM
1

Also, does nobody remember how Boris basically pushed May out of office? Maybe if he wanted more women in positions of power he shoudn't be a opportunistic coup-master...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:43 PM
9

As time goes on the same becomes truer and truer for reddit too.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:23 PM
2

I mean what you're saying is true, but you're also unironically proving u/Thegrizzlybearzombie's point about an "Us Vs Them attitude." At it's best this sub is really good at deconstructing widespread unhelpful narratives that obstruct real progress, and presenting new healthier ways of looking at the world. At it's worst though it's nothing but a perfect inversion of all the things it claims to hate about thoose feminist forums. Instead of evil men seeking to rape women at every dark alley, it'…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:18 AM
5

Is there an age-based-breakdown of that statistic? I'd be interested if it's more elderly conservative voting church-goer types or doomer zoomer apolitical types.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:55 PM
0

They're threatening terrorism on twitter, there is in fact a difference. How many left-wing assassinations have there been in the last 25 years?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:18 PM
4

I mean, I do get what you're saying, but isn't "Men always want sex" a myth the sub actively tries to combat?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:30 AM
2

I mean, to a certain extent the same applies to male incels too. Broaden your net wide enough and eventually you will find someone willing to fuck you, even they are a divorced alcholic retiree with a long list of fetishes you find utterly disturbing. I would like to think (but I know it'll vary from person to person) that the real core of both incel movements is a struggle to find meaningful connection, rather than litterally just not having sex.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:20 AM
5

Be careful though, if you find a girl attractive your then objectifying her. You should strive to keep all women in the sweet-spot, where like you would fap to a picture of her in a swimsuit if you didn't have internet access, but you'd also never seek out such an image if you had the choice.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:10 AM
6

We can pee standing up, that's pretty cool.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:00 AM
2

Avoid fish, there's a lot of layers to the oceanic food chain which means bioaccumulation is a much bigger problem than it is eating plants or land-based herbivores. Ultimately though, we need a regulatory solution. Things aren't so bad today, sure you might have a slightly smaller dick/lower sperm count than you would otherwise but ultimately most men are still relatively healthy & capable of reproduction. But: Enviromental Concentration of plastics is only going to go up unless addressed. Prob…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter