TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OpenupmyeagerEyes0 Archive

View 0 posts and 166 comments by OpenupmyeagerEyes0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

there’s a huge difference between being a loving, nurturing partner and having to constantly clean up for your partner because he doesn’t know how to or makes you do all the chores and all daily life tasks for him. women on average do more housework than their husbands even when they earn more, and women actually lose hours of free time when they get married while their husbands gain it because she takes over more chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:09 PM
1

women want respectful men who view them as equals and don’t abuse them. we don’t care where they come from as long as they meet those qualifications and have similar values.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 04:21 PM
1

actual definition of what to what? i wasn’t able to see your post, it was taken down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 04:08 PM
1

it was taken down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:54 PM
1

it’s not western vs non-western, it’s abusive vs non abusive. idk why you’re so hung up on western or not, it’s weird
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:26 PM
0

it’s hard to have a positive view on men when they don’t even view us as their equals https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/03/12/gen-z-men-poll-wife-obey-husband/89087781007/ and no, women are still oppressed globally. there is not a single country on earth with full equality according to the united nations. and women still live in a system designed for men and face the consequences of that, like how women are more likely to be seriously injured or killed in car accidents compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:41 PM
2

i have no data on that. all i know is that men my age are becoming more and more misogynistic, with a third of them saying women should obey their husbands. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/03/12/gen-z-men-poll-wife-obey-husband/89087781007/ in terms of “hating men”, it would be hard for a lot of women to have a positive opinion about men when they don’t view us as their equals
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:35 PM
3

when tf did i say that? all i said is that a non-western man that is not abusive or misogynistic is better than a western man that is. women don’t want to be abused
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:18 PM
6

if men didn’t hate us they wouldn’t systemically abuse us, rape us, take our rights away, limit our opportunity, and build systems that oppress us. some women hate men BECAUSE of these things. it is reactionary
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:37 AM
4

i’d personally say that a non-western man who doesn’t rape abuse and kill is better than a western one that does. “better” is determined by action and beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:34 AM
0

i do view them (incels) as a danger because this is dangerous, and i am cautious around every man because not being cautious got me sexually assaulted. that’s literally what the claim started as. my claim was that this rhetoric is dangerous because it normalizes violence against women. despite actual physical violence against me, i still view men as people. being cautious and viewing incels as dangerous does not erase their personhood, it protects me from more sexual violence. i still see men as…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 02:55 AM
2

dawg that’s saying he joined in 2021. he posted it two days ago now. the other one joined in 2018. the day i found it was recent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 12:07 AM
2

“probably just joking” is doing a LOT of heavy lifting there. none of these men are joking. i used to frequent that website. all of the posts are like this. incel subreddits are banned because they explicitly call for violence against women. i literally just went to their forum rn and found this. they do not view women as people. college educated women still view men as people and as valuable members of society deserving of rights. incels do not view women this way. inceltears mocks these misogy…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:51 AM
0

college educated women aren’t calling for the death or rape of all men, or systemic disenfranchisement, or justify beating and abusing men like incels do <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:11 AM
0

do you not think their rhetoric is dangerous?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:47 PM
2

incel rhetoric alone is dangerous. it normalizes behavior and hate speech that they propagate
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:37 PM
6

here is the thought process. women see incels and red pillers be completely and totally misogynistic, claim hypergamy, people call for the repealing of the 19th amendment, etc. we then see usually these same men complain about being lonely and not getting any attention from women. thus comments like these are left.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:33 PM
3

80% of women develop the “baby blues” and 1 in 5 postpartum women develop postpartum depression, and only 50% of these women actually are treated. suicide is one of the leading causes of death during the postpartum period. it’s not an irrelevant or invalid comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:22 PM
4

what does postpartum depression lead to? self harm and suicide. it’s directly related, i don’t know how you don’t see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:12 PM
1

what statistical backing do you have for women’s attachment being that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:39 PM
1

i’d argue it’s the opposite. it is statistically men who leave relationships when their partners become less useful to them. take chronic and terminal diagnoses, for example. men are statistically more likely to leave their partners with a diagnosis like cancer because their wives can no longer do work around the house, or, more commonly, no longer can have sex with them and are less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:21 PM
3

i literally said i don’t agree with how it is currently formatted and set up, im saying its not criminal. if you’re not able to calmly engage in dialogue without insults, then you need to take a step back, jeez.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:57 PM
1

if you’re going to post in a debate sub, you should have evidence to prove your claim. most of what gets posted here by bp and red pill men about hypergamy, for example, is disproven by data and by just looking around my college campus. in most couples i see, the men are a lot less attractive than their partners. the original ok cupid study that started all this that people love to use actually showed that while women rated men lower on average, they still swiped on the average looking men. the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:54 PM
1

its prevention. they arent on a list of criminals who have exhibited criminal behaviors. its a list of people who need more resources and monitoring. i don’t agree with the way that it is set up in this instance, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:50 PM
–

i’m in a commitment relationship with my man. we aren’t married and have been together for almost 8 months now. we live together, pay bills, have a promise ring. just not married. committed doesn’t have to mean marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:41 PM
1

i mean if you aren’t presenting any data in your claim and all available evidence suggests the opposite, what else do we do? even when evidence to the contrary is presented, i’d say like 70% of you guys in my experience will ignore it and hold your “women are hoes” opinions anyway, so what’s the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:40 PM
1

yes. every mental health appointment i go to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:31 PM
1

where does this say it is criminal
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:30 PM
1

postpartum depression
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:29 PM
2

doesn’t mean strictly marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:16 PM
2

because claims like this lack any available evidence to support it. it comes down to one big generalization
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:14 PM
1

reread the first sentence
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 04:12 AM
3

the United Nations and basic thinking. you need food to survive. you don’t need sex to survive
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 07:36 PM
7

because it’s not just genes. these are actual small PEOPLE that you are advocating for to starve because of what, you’re jealous they aren’t yours? someone else made a mistake? why does the defenseless child have to suffer because of it? does a functioning society not help its most vulnerable and downtrodden? jesus christ you need empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 02:55 AM
13

food is a human right and basic necessity to live, sex isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 02:52 AM
1

i’ve literally seen men on here say women shouldn’t have the right to vote and that we’re incapable of feeling romantic love, i’m not surprised by anything these nut jobs say about us.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 04:03 PM
1

it hasn’t been debunked. it has limitations like every study, sure, but it hasn’t been debunked.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:20 AM
1

this has been extensively studied in sociology. it’s so well known that doctors will literally warn women when they are diagnosed. you can plug your fingers in your ears and ignore it, but this is a very real phenomenon that happens, it’s just uncomfortable for you because it is different than what you’ve been told and the narrative you try to spin
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:11 AM
1

according to what? yeah, maybe some shitty women, but men leaving critically ill wives is a well documented and studied, with men 6x more likely to leave a critically ill or disabled wife than vise versa
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 04:43 AM
–

dude what are you talking about? like paying on first dates? people like you with this mindset are the reason i refuse to let men pay for me until a few dates in for fear you’ll use it as me owing you something. most women care about men. we care about other people. the only reason we hate on you is because shitty men that say things like women shouldn’t have the right to vote or are incapable of feeling love make the rest of you look bad, so yeah, of course we’re gonna hate on people who want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:13 AM
1

the only inherent value you’ll see half the black pill or red pill people say women have is for sex. and i’m not just talking about value, im talking about personhood as well. red pill and black pill men don’t see women either as people at all or on people in the same regard they see men. i have seen men on here say women should not have the right to vote, friendship with women is useless and we provide no benefit outside of sex, that we are incapable of feeling romantic love, etc. these same th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:40 AM
1

“women are evil” was a made up example of an outrageous claim that most people would disagree with that some people on here would evidently agree with. “women can’t feel romantic love” is a slightly less but still outrageous claim most people would disagree with but some people here actually do agree with. i’m not claiming that’s what was said, i’m illustrating the outlandishness made by people in this sub by drawing parallels to an outwardly insane claim to one people on this sub agree with
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:28 AM
-1

nowhere in his post did he even imply that. he even said these claims are a direct response to men claiming the opposite. how many men on here have you seen say friendship or a non-sexual relationship with a woman is pointless or similar claims? i’ve seen countless. this is a direct response to those claims, he never said attention from women is better than attention from other men or implied it anywhere in his post. just that they are equally helpful and women can make good friends, contrary to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:44 PM
-2

because in spaces like these, men are seen as inherently valuable with no need to debate their worth. with women, there’s a need to debate our value, worth, and personhood. the only time you’ll see a post on here doubting a man’s inherent worth is if another redpiller is comparing them to an item in a marketplace instead of a person. the same can’t be said about women, as most of the posts on this sub are debating a woman’s inherent worth, personhood, and autonomy or topic adjacent to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:12 PM
–

🤝
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:08 PM
3

maybe it’s a mixed bag on which red pill stuff gets upvoted and downvoted, because i just came from a post where a guy claimed that women are incapable of feeling romantic love towards men and that got like 55 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:48 PM
4

literally. like i’ll engage with guys who appear to be good faith, and i’ve had some actually good dialogue with some of them, but good god, some of the people in this sub are nuts
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:47 PM
–

i never claimed that all women’s love is enduring and i never claimed all men’s love is conditional. i didn’t make any absolute claims, i just said that when it comes to me, i fell in love with the people i dated and they’ll always have a part of me. it’s pushback on the idea that women can’t feel romantic love towards men and the idea that all men’s love is unconditional, from my perspective and the perspective of the other women around me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:44 PM
2

i find it hilarious someone could post something like “women are evil” and it’ll get at least like 50 upvotes but someone posting “women are amazing” will get downvoted into oblivion 😭. gotta love this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:27 PM
3

that didn’t answer any of my questions. so women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:32 PM
–

the problem is that there’s no evidence to back any of these claims up, including the 80/20 thing. and i’m not the exception. it’s the lived experience of me and the other women and girls around me, a vast majority of them. and i should’ve been clearer, i wasn’t dating two guys at once, i’ve just had two boyfriends in the past, and i still love both of them. this is like most other women i know too. there isn’t any evidence to suggest men’s love is more unconditional either. i’d actually argue t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:24 PM
6

none of the links prove this either. it also just doesn’t make any sense. can women feel romantic love towards other women, or are men the exception? are you saying we can experience platonic and familial love but for some reason, romantic love is again some mythical exception? it just isn’t logical
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:58 PM
–

none of these support the idea that women are incapable of loving men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:28 PM
–

are you suggesting when we see a random guy on the street that we find physically attractive that we somehow know his wealth and status? this doesn’t make any sense
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:15 PM
–

what you’re describing is limerance, not love, and women experience it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:14 PM
–

women talking about how they don’t need men is a reaction to being used and abused by terrible men in their past, or seeing terrible men in the wild, like people on twitter or .it. or because we physically don’t need a man’s resources to survive now considering we can open our own bank accounts and get jobs without discrimination (hooray feminism!) it’s not a conspiracy. this doesn’t mean they don’t care about or feel empathy towards men in general, just that they’re tired of misogyny and abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:03 PM
–

absolutely not the case. all of the guys i’ve been in relationships or situationships with have either been objectively average or slightly below average (i didn’t think so but my friends would tell me). but when we fall in love with them, we start viewing them as the most attractive guy in the world. most of them have been average height too except for one guy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:57 PM
–

the reason they gave is literally one of the biggest reasons people get a divorce. women don’t want to be maids and pick up after their grown husbands. and like the other person said, virtually no woman is going to blow up her life because she’s “bored” and “wants to have some fun”. this is just an idea red pillers create to avoid accountability and the real reason women leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:45 PM
–

dude, what the fuck are you talking about? i get that you’re probably pretty young and probably got dumped by a girl, but to then extend that to literally every woman and claim that we can’t feel love is insane. you are suggesting half of the population can’t feel one of the most basic human emotions, and that is so absurd i shouldn’t even have to tell you why. i’ve been in 2 relationships in my life so far. i loved them more than i thought was possible, so much so that i let one of them walk al…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:38 PM
6

no? i hug my male friends all the time. we both appreciate it. physical touch in platonic ways is important for everyone, regardless of gender
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 08:24 PM
12

where did i say that? like at all? i said platonic relationships with women, not random women off the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:04 PM
-2

humans aren’t a market though. you aren’t an item. you’re a person with hopes, dreams, fears, goals, likes and dislikes, and a story. placing your only value on getting a date and some metaphorical market will cause you nothing but more suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:00 PM
5

not at all. but a lot of men, from my limited perspective, seem to be lacking deep platonic relationships as well as romantic ones, and even in platonic relationships, there’s this standard among guys that hugging and stuff is gay. again, not all men are like this, but my guy friends tell me this and say that’s why they like having platonic relationships with women, because we’re more apt to show physical affection like hugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:56 PM
1

call me crazy but i don’t think it’s good or cool to be a creep and push away your friends in the pursuit of sex
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 04:11 AM
1

i mean if that’s the approach he wants to go with (one success per a couple women finding him a creep) then by all means, keep going, there’s nothing i can do to stop him. i’d say it’d probably work better to lead with general compliments in non-club settings as opposed to sexual ones but what do i know
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:17 PM
1

i mean in this specific scenario with this specific line, and rereading my reply, i think it’s pretty obvious that’s what i meant considering i never implied it was your only success ever. you got one woman’s attention and the rest found you creepy. the irony of saying blue pill people lack contextual thinking yet doing the exact same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:15 PM
1

yeah, some women are shitty, just like some men are shitty. i don’t really understand why this is some massive revelation. this isn’t a problem i hear anywhere but red pill spaces. this has never been a problem in any of my friendships, nor any of my friends friendships, nor in any other online space i see. in fact, what i see most often (from what my guy friends have told me and from what i’ve seen online in regards to male female friendships) is that guys appreciate having female friends becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 06:39 AM
-1

i think you just have shitty friends then if they want to tell you about their problems but not here about yours, that’s not really a woman thing. and i think everyone wants to be heard and just vent sometimes, that’s not specific to women either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:14 AM
1

her position is not difficult to understand. if you’re want to be friends with a woman, be friends with her genuinely. eventually somewhere down the line, you both might develop feelings for each other, you might not. if you’re interested in a woman romantically, don’t approach her like you want to be friends with her and then be surprised when she only wants to be friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 03:03 AM
-1

would you listen to a dude friend talk about his relationship problems? i don’t see how it’s any different with women unless you view them as only good for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 02:39 AM
0

i don’t think he’s being proven right if he got one success and the rest of his friends called him a creep but whatever floats your boat
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 02:38 AM
14

of course, all women are like that except the women you know who are the exception 🤦‍♀️ if you don’t appreciate emotional support, jokes, and someone to hang out with just because they are a woman and the only value you see from women and being around them is sex, you’re misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 02:30 AM
1

i’m 19f so we’re the same age. for me, i don’t need or care if a dude is rich or has a lot of money. i mean, it’s kinda impressive if they worked for it, but what i’m looking for rn is someone who just has plans and a drive to succeed. i don’t care if the dude i’m going out with is dirt poor atm, as long as he has goals and ambitions for what his future, including career, will look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:26 PM
1

ignore everything i said because it proves you wrong. proving me right about being wary of red pill men. the jokes write themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:35 PM
0

children can pay sales tax sure, but it’s a disingenuous position because not only do they not pay income tax (unless we’re talking about employed 15-17, which i’ll address in a second) , which is what is generally meant by that, children again aren’t held to the same standards of responsibility, accountability, and autonomy of adult citizens. children having choices, including those income tax paying 15-17 year olds, is not the same as making informed, rational, and legally binding decisions. c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:50 PM
1

one man’s arguably misogynistic and androcentric theory of psychology does not support the claim that women are less morally developed than men, and unless you can provide actual peer reviewed scientific studies corroborating your claim, your position is based on misogyny, not science. plenty of men are “morons” as well or single issue voters about other issues, should we start a movement that men shouldn’t be allowed to vote? some children (15-17) pay taxes yes, but that’s why taxation is not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:13 PM
2

you didn’t “expose” anything because your points are founded in misunderstanding of a feminist perspective. bodily autonomy, as a principle, is the idea that an autonomous person has agency over their body- the right to control what things are or are not to be done to their own bodies, be it in regards to sex, contraception, medical care, health, life, or future, without the threat of coercion or violence. the issue of abortion is absolutely the principle of bodily autonomy. women, as autonomous…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:56 PM
1

it’s not moving the goalpost, it’s considering a multitude of factors in regards to a topic. if you are incapable of considering multiple things at once, it’s not my fault. again, your perspective on feminism is not based in reality and is something i’ve already addressed and will not do again. feminists can and do consider male only drafting unethical because feminism is not a female supremacy movement, despite you believing it is. drafting in general is unethical because it violates the princi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:32 PM
0

children don’t pay taxes and aren’t mentally capable of making decisions like that which is why they don’t have the right to vote. women do, which is why women have the right to vote. people being stupid doesn’t mean they don’t have the mental capacity to vote. bodily autonomy is a fundamental principle in ethics and thus women’s rights, so it would make sense lots of people care about it. christians were fundamental in dismantling slavery but they were also the upholders of slavery. feminists d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:20 PM
0

we are, especially intersectional feminists. it’s usually liberal feminists in my experience that are more focused on what’s happening in their own countries and not globally. education itself is a tool to fight against oppression. for some women, life was hell on earth. and some women still have this reality. even in “first world” countries like the united states, women still face inequality. girls are still married off to older men as child brides. women do not have bodily autonomy in many sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:05 PM
1

the fact that you are completely unwilling to consider that women worldwide might still be oppressed and are unwilling to read my very real examples and statistics proves you are here in bad faith, and you don’t actually care about women. your position is not based on facts, but feelings. the oppression of women worldwide is very real and documented, and you being completely unwilling to confront your beliefs is weird and disturbing. regardless of if you believe it or not, women worldwide are st…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:57 PM
1

and you are behaving exactly as a red pill man, dismissing everything i say without considering any of it. unemployed people are still competent adults with the ability to make decisions, and have likely in the past paid taxes or could in the future. the right to vote is only halfway predicated on taxation, which is why i brought up the second characteristic. people earning low enough still pay taxes, they just don’t make enough to file a tax return, which is a completely separate topic. even st…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:54 PM
1

children don’t have the right to vote because they don’t pay taxes (taxation without representation) and they don’t have the capacity to make informed and competent decisions in regards to a multitude of things, including politics. women meet all of the above criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:44 PM
2

part of intersectionality means that feminists fight for women on an international scale. we don’t care about women in our country, but in other countries as well. in the united states, 66 million women don’t have bodily autonomy. in globally 12 million girls under the age of 18 were married to older men, equating up to 28 children a minute. 700 million worldwide were married before 18, and 250 million of them were married before 15. 1 in 3 women worldwide has been the victim of physical or sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:42 PM
0

we don’t let children vote because they don’t pay taxes and don’t have the mental capacity to understand politics and how their decisions would impact the country. women do. women have historically been discriminated against and restricted from and to certain jobs, and even within them, paid less because they are women. feminism fought in both instances for women to have the right to vote and not be discriminated against in the workplace, as well as the ability to have more than a few job option…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:30 PM
1

you have an incredibly narrow view of what oppression looks like and power dynamics. you don’t have to be fabulously wealthy with a harem for women worldwide to be oppressed still. in fact, misogyny and the oppression of women will never benefit the average man like that. women on a global scale for centuries have systemically been denied opportunities, mobility, access to services, a political voice, etc, and many women worldwide are still denied. in the united states, 66 million women don’t ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:26 PM
0

no it was not. it has always been a critique on totalitarianism under soviet russia, not leftism or communism. totalitarianism manifested under soviet russia was about just that: totalitarianism; it never critiqued communism in its theoretical form. orwell himself was a democratic socialist to my knowledge, so his issue wasn’t with the ideas of socialism and communism themselves, but how the ideas become tainted by authoritarian rulers. various interpretations of it have been applied to everythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:18 PM
0

do children pay taxes? no? then that’s why they don’t have the right to vote, they aren’t taxed without representation, nor are they developed enough to have the capacity to make decisions regarding politics. men had more rights and responsibilities because they didn’t allow women to have these rights or responsibilities. what is so difficult to understand about this. women didn’t historically choose to not have these responsibilities, men made it so they couldn’t. and you clearly have reading c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:10 PM
0

systemically restricting a group’s opportunities, mobility, access to services, etc, is oppression, regardless of if you think the oppression was “good”. women on a global scale for centuries have systemically been denied opportunities, mobility, access to services, a political voice, etc, and many women worldwide are still denied. in the united states, 66 million women don’t have bodily autonomy. in globally 12 million girls under the age of 18 were married to older men, equating up to 28 child…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:04 PM
3

because you still have a stake in the nation regardless of if you have to “fight for it” or not. you still live in it and are effected by policy set forth by legislators and should thus be able to vote for legislators who have your interests in mind. that is the basic premise of voting. it has never had anything remotely to do with the draft or who served in the military, which like i said has only been used as an expander and not a limiter. and you have an incredibly distorted view of feminism …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:11 AM
0

are you genuinely going to sit here and say that historically women were the ones oppressing men? are you joking? women had no political power to oppress because they couldn’t vote, couldn’t hold office, etc. there is no universe where men working difficult jobs because women weren’t allowed to is women oppressing men. it’s an absolutely ridiculous claim. and the fact that where you’re from men can legally rape their wives is sickening and exactly why feminism is needed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:44 AM
0

men are the ones who set up the system of only men being drafted, so in this scenario it is yet again men creating a barrier for women. being part of a draft has never historically been a prerequisite for the right to vote, nor should it be. for example, if the right to vote was based on who could be drafted, it sets a precedent of ableism, as people with disabilities and medical conditions could not get drafted and thus under your worldview not have the right to vote. it has never been about wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:35 AM
-2

no, you’re just so used to supremacy that equality feels like oppression. unless you can substantiate your claim, it’s a nothing burger. also, none of the themes or motifs of animal farm were critiques of feminism so you can calm down with that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:18 AM
2

are you genuinely going to sit here and try to say feminism played no role in women being able to vote or work
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:08 AM
0

my first bf (we were 16, i’m 19 now) was a virgin and so was i, and he was infertile. with my second we always used condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:50 AM
-1

yes. equality is a plague. how dare women want the right to vote and work
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:43 AM
1

yes, i’m very up to date on current events. but i still don’t think any man or woman should be forced to serve, especially in combat roles, against their will
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:07 PM
1

the country i live in, the united states, has a large enough military, so i speak to what i’m familiar with. conquest/invasion in the modern era would be an unbelievably unlikely scenario. in terms of war, that should incentivize a country to use diplomatic means or increase benefits to the military so it actually becomes a desirable occupation, not force unwilling people to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 05:59 PM
9

i’m not sure why everyone downvoted you, i certainly agree. i would also argue that the draft shouldn’t exist at all, for men or women. no one should be forced to something they don’t want to
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:04 AM
4

that’s the justice website giving a quick rundown of when it was changed, this is an online version of the actual legal statutes by cornell law school
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:59 PM
2

i’m saying most women support male victims, and any negativity or demeaning that i’ve seen has come from other men, and overall, more men demean both male and female victims than women do. as for the cardi b thing, there’s no excuse for that. i’d argue that some fans, especially the younger ones, don’t know this happened, so i wouldn’t conflate support for an artist for a lack of support for male victims. for example, i used to be a big Brand New fan but apparently the lead singer was a creep to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:44 PM
1

sorry i meant to respond to the other fella, i had just woken up so i must’ve missed it and hit reply to you. much love 🫶
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:30 PM
3

feminism to them looks like those anti-feminist anti-sjw freak out videos that were popular in 2016 without acknowledging most of us are normal and without acknowledging the benefits feminism has made for the country
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:23 PM
1

that’s not true. look up 10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally. rape is defined as: Rape.—Any person subject to this chapter who commits a sexual act upon another person by— (1) using unlawful force against that other person; (2) using force causing or likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to any person; (3) threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, grievous bodily harm, or kidnapping; (4) first rendering that …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:54 PM
7

the only people i have ever seen minimize and joke about rape, both when it happens to men and women, is men. men will joke about and demean female victims and bring up male victims when a woman talks about her story. then the second news comes out about a teenage boy being assaulted by an older woman, comments are filled with “wish it was me” “lucky guy”. or when a guy comes forward with his story “you couldn’t fight back” “i would’ve liked it”. the overwhelming majority of those who demean mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:44 PM
28

exactly. i’ll be looking at insta reels and come across a story of a teenage boy being assaulted by his high school teacher and the men in the comments are saying they wish it were them. i never see any women saying that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:54 AM
8

a lot of them just parrot things they hear in red pill circles and take it as reality without considering actual reality if that makes sense. like you hear these guys saying “you have to be a 10, rich, and 6’4 to get a girlfriend because hoes are shallow” and take that as reality while failing to actually look around outside and see that the overwhelming majority of men don’t fit that description and still have wives and girlfriends. and because they’re young, they don’t think twice about it. be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:52 AM
12

i think most red pill men here are
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:13 AM
68

i don’t think anyone here actually things women raping men isn’t as bad as men making women, you’re just creating scenarios to be angry about
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:10 AM
0

literally no one sees a problem with 21 and 25 bro what are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:06 AM
1

i’m single now, but when i did have a boyfriend, it would be like looking at a nice painting or a beautiful sunset. you acknowledge it looks good, and move on. when we’d watch movies together we both would point out super hot people. sometimes my bf would point of girls he found hot that he thought i would find pretty too (i’m bi). but there’s no lusting, no getting flustered, no flirting or planning anything. just acknowledging they’re attractive and moving on with my day
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:24 AM
2

dick size definitely doesn’t matter. i’ve been with two partners so far, and the one that was better was actually smaller. but he was better because he had a good rhythm, listened to me, and focused on trying to make me feel good before himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:48 AM
1

no, he is not. he was found civilly liable of sexual assault. that means he did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:46 AM
1

no not really. and absolutely tf not it is. misandry does not result in the death and removal or rights of men. it results in sad and ashamed men. i’m not going to take anything that post seriously considering it calls things like “i can show skin almost without fear of being arrested”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:46 AM
2

they make him an adjudicated rapist
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:41 AM
2

picking on one man she’s beefing with is not misandry. she’s not saying all men are like that. and one song with equal amount of misogyny as misandry? brotha, multiple people have given you lyrics and multiple songs of men being misogynistic. hell, you can look at probably any rap song and see misogyny in action at a far greater level than misandry in songs. you refusing to acknowledge these examples that are spoon fed to you and failing to seek out your own understanding means you’re a manchild…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 02:24 AM
2

civil suits still mean he is culpable. and she waited until her parents died because she didn’t want he parents to view her in a different light for having been violated. he is by definition a rapist. he even tried to accuse her of defamation after calling him that but lost the case
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 02:21 AM
4

if this is your response, YOU are the manchild sabrina is talking about, and i’m not even a fan of her music.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:26 PM
3

no, the only reason it was civil was because it had passed the statute of limitations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:24 PM
0

i don’t think so. there are always going to be male grifters in today’s day and age using insecure men as a way to make money by feeding them dating lies. that way, when they experience failure, the man will be reinforced in his beliefs that women are bitches and go back to the grifter and give him more attention and need more ill fated advice. it’s a feedback loop. we see this happening with people like andrew tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:34 PM
1

i know my friends well enough to recognize when/if they have a crush on me. and they don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:47 AM
0

i feel like you haven’t actually interacted with any feminists other than those rage bait videos from 2016
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:40 PM
1

the problem is that a lot of men view it as a real thing. and you men who realize it doesn’t exist should call out men who do for perpetuating misogynist ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 08:47 PM
1

don’t men have an entire phrase for women who are older? does “hit the wall” ring a bell?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:23 PM
0

it’s not occasional. feminism is for men and women. but it started off as a women’s liberation movement, so of course the primary focus will be women’s rights. but we fight for men’s rights too
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:10 PM
1

i have literally had it happen to me a few times and then seen it happen to other people with my own eyes, what 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:28 PM
1

maybe it just depends on the college then? because i’ve had random dudes who i had no connection to come up to me, and i’ve seen it with random people too. i go to a large public school in chicago and it’s a commuter school too, but maybe that’s just the culture there
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:49 AM
1

i’m not saying just because feminists are against the patriarchy that that is all they are doing for men. feminists regularly advocate for more social support for men’s mental health. and that is just one example. and normalizing one thing does not mean we can’t normalize another. feminism is about choice for everyone. if a woman chooses to work instead of being a sahm, that’s wonderful. if a man wants to be a sahd, that’s great too. we are able to focus on a multitude of different points. and u…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:04 AM
1

because men are hurt by the patriarchy too. let’s use an analogy and then an example. if someone were to punch someone else in the face, their hand would hurt. in this scenario, the puncher is a man under the patriarchy, the punching is the patriarchy, and the person getting punched is a woman. i’m not saying men enforce the patriarchy per say, but even though it hurts women way more, it still hurts men. now let’s look at a real world example. because under the patriarchy, men are expected to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:34 AM
-2

i mean go for it, but considering feminists fight for men’s rights (like men’s mental health) in addition to women’s, you’re losing an ally
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 05:48 PM
2

see everyone says this online, but i never actually see this in the real world. granted, i go to college and live on campus so that might be a factor, but i see men go up to women all the time, me included, and the conversations always appear to be polite. and again, maybe it’s because i’m in college, but this is not something i see at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:30 PM
1

THIS!!! THANK YOU
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:26 PM
1

i think the friend zone as you speak of it is just men expecting things or feeling entitled to a woman other than friendship. it’s not something women put men in, it’s something men put men in. for a woman, it’s just a friendship
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 05:37 AM
5

the friend zone doesn’t exist. it’s just called being friends
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:13 PM
1

i can guarantee none of them are like that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:12 PM
7

that is not true. my friendships are purely platonic. some of them are actually in relationships. do you genuinely think that little of men that none of them are capable of having relationships where they don’t need someone’s body
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:54 PM
8

most of my friends are actually men. do they just not exist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:42 PM
1

i’m talking specifically about women who had held this position for years and had the relevant experience were fired and jobs given to men. the person i was originally replying to was saying there was no dei, i would argue that taking the jobs from women to give them to veteran men is the very kind of misconstrued idea of what dei is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:39 AM
1

war
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:44 AM
1

the problem is even in the case where a woman had had the position for years, and even it being a female dominated field, some women were fired to give jobs to veteran men
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:41 AM
5

yes, it is entirely believable that when you said women did nothing you meant all of them did nothing because you lot have a history of denying and undermining women’s accomplishments. the increase was an addition of 6.7 million women. manufacturing especially rose from 21 to 34%. this is not nothing. this is in a time where women were discouraged to work until now, faced discrimination (especially women of color), and had a home they were expected to take care of. at this time, an increase like…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 07:31 PM
3

your claim was that women did nothing. these sources prove you wrong. a counter to your claim does not require the exact number of women in the workforce. fortunately, i have that number anyways here. i acknowledge that a decreased demand led to women leaving their positions, but it’s cute you refuse to acknowledge that despite women being wanting to keep their jobs, they were forced out by men. also, the link works on my end but you could just as easily look up the name of the article, which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:24 PM
1

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/students-teachers/student-resources/research-starters/women-wwii https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/stories/rosie-wendy-and-government-girls https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/women-in-world-war-ii.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:57 PM
-2

this is categorically false. it is well documented that women stepped up to take manufacturing jobs during times of war and then were fired once men got back
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:44 PM
2

then why in gods name are you even dating us? for sex? you realize how shallow that is, the exact same thing you accuse women of? i want someone who loves me, not someone who thinks it’s emasculating to love, and i’m sure i can speak for all women when i say that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:46 PM
1

on neither level are they able to feel pain. it is physiologically impossible based on the fact that they don’t have the physical connections between their peripheral nervous system and the brain necessary to feel pain, nor is the brain developed enough to process the information. this is a fact. embryos do not eat, they get nutrients through the umbilical cord. if you’re talking about swallowing amniotic fluid, that is not a marker of sentience. and i’m not sure you actually understand what pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:33 AM
1

embryos are not physiologically capable of feeling pain or having anything close to sentience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:07 AM
1

again, they had no scientific reasoning behind their beliefs. only hatred of those different to them. respecting the bodily autonomy of women is not bigoted. acknowledging basic human rights is not bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:04 AM
2

the germans had no scientific reasoning behind their beliefs and were horrible bigots, i have scientific evidence behind my claim and sound logic. holy reach
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:01 AM
2

embryos do not have a will to live or procreate. they do not have wants. it does not have sentience. fetus-phobic is crazy 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:56 AM
2

resorting to attacks because you have no argument huh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:16 AM
0

nope, i have sentience, a six week developed embryo does not
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:11 AM
0

dang you’re right, i forgot
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:10 AM
5

then surely you understand that it is a paraphilia and not representative of the average person. it is not normal. normal people are not attracted to prolific killers. given these men have national media attention and that there is very few of them, and given that there is a small amount of hybristophiles but even smaller amount of prolific killers for them to obsess over, of course there will be a higher ratio of these women with paraphilias going after these men. by ignoring percentages you ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:35 PM
1

do you understand what hybristophilia is
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:26 PM
3

hybristophiles are not representative of the average population
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:19 PM
-2

walk out on the street. go to a college campus. you’ll see just that. as a bi woman, i’d say more often than not the women i see in relationships are actually more attractive than their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:10 PM
-1

<image> ah yes, a baby
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 09:59 PM
1

teenage girls of every generation can suck. teenagers can suck in general. i’m turning 20 this year, but this was true when i was 13 too
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:08 PM
0

it’s not a formal talk, like one you sit down for. it’s comments in passing. “come help me in the kitchen, you need to learn for when you have a husband”, “he’s hurting and picking on you because he likes you, you should be happy”, “shave your arms and legs, men don’t like when you have hair”, etc. subtle comments from parents but especially older family members that upholds the patriarchy and conditions young girls to accept mistreatment from men and to prioritize them over your own preferences…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:04 PM
1

100% agree, i forgot to mention that in my other comments
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:03 PM
1

clarity on what
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:08 AM
2

if she doesn’t feel like you care about her or are incompetent, she will either not be attracted to you or just not want sex from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:00 AM
–

i don’t think anyone has a problem with men using sex toys or porn occasionally. a lot of us have a problem with prostitution and passport bros because of, like you said, exploitation. lots of prostitutes are trafficked or underage. and in regards to passport bros, it can be inherently exploitative if a guy is seeking out younger, impoverished women because he knows she’s going to say yes to get money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:56 AM
–

it’s not about dishes. it’s about you respecting her time and not making her do all the work around the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:52 AM
1

the “ideal” thin body type that drives many girls to eating disorders. i have experience with this one
/r/MensRights19/09/22 10:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter