TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OphiuchusOdysseus Archive

View 2 posts and 17 comments by OphiuchusOdysseus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
275

GeneralOphiuchusOdysseus/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:51 AM
222

GeneralOphiuchusOdysseus/r/MensRights21/12/24 04:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Borders? I would argue r/feminism should be renamed to r/misandry at this point and they should add the already implicit rule that whoever disagrees with hating men gets banned.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 04:45 PM
7

Seems like a bug to me. You are not supposed to have fears based on irrational behaviour. What, are we going to say phobias are a feature too now?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:26 AM
6

What do you even mean by 'pure victims That makes no sense at all. Just because men take more risks makes them not true victims? Have you ever thought they take more risks because of the circusntances they are brought in? Men comprise most of the homeless, are more likely to be poor, higher rates of physical abuse as a child, all factors that lead them to more vulnerable situations and thus more likely to be victimized by crime .You yourself quoted. Men are more likely to be victims of violent c…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:24 AM
3

Children and men first, women last is my motto, personally.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 05:43 PM
3

The intent has to be solely gender-related and it's not easy to prove. Whatever statistic on femicide you encounter are highly underestimated. Those two sentences are contradictory. If you can't prove it to be solely gender-related how can you say it's underestimated? From what I've seen it's actually the opposite, they are overestimated, as intimate partner violence is not based on gender alone, it happens to men too and in same sex relationships. Yes, men are killed in larger numbers than woma…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 02:43 PM
0

Nature hasn't really made men expendable. Any society with a massive shortage of men will collapse and never recover. Also while a man might be able to sire multiple children, it's not practical. It would absolutely cripple genetic diversity. It would also be impossible for a single man to raise so many children, leaving the burden on single moms and we know how good that tends to turns out. This is not even counting the fact most women wouldn't actually agree to share the same men. Despite what…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:39 PM
4

willing to go down with the ship. Ukranian and Russian conscripts being dragged screaming from their homes to be sent to die on the frontlines would disagree with you. They don't sound very willing, do they?
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:30 PM
1

Women currently represent about 60 percent of university students in Sweden, a pioneer in gender equality More women then men in universities = gender equality? Theri definition of equality is just female supremacy.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:52 AM
2

What about the nen who get raped and tortured during war. Do they deserve it for some reason?
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:17 PM
11

Mate men are way more likely to be violently attacked and killed than women. Our entire history is men killing each other brutally, both solo and in groups. Your "they won'y even go up against other men" mentality is too naive and is lie spread by feminists to victimize themselves.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:41 PM
2

458 civillians is bad but still a small number compared to Ukraine's population of 37,42 million. Even the total number of civilliian casualties doesn't come close to the total population of the country. While I agree Russia's goal is to destroy Ukraine culture and national identity it does not mean to exterminate the people livingg there but to conqueer. Whether that would be comparable or worse than dying is arguable. They don't have to roll over and let that happen but in that case a military…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:57 AM
5

Not every war ends with the the enemy population destroyed or enslaved. Also how is it not a mens rights issue if only men are affected and only men get drafted in nearly all countries? Also I can see a draft being justified if the threat is really existential, as in a significant portion of the population dies or lives in inhuman conditions and I made that clear in my post. WW1 and WW2 likely qualify for that. But not every war is existential. Do you think Vietnam posed an existential threat to…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:55 PM
2

Only if the threat to the population is existential. As in if they don't fight, everyone dies or lives in inhuman conditions.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:48 PM
3

I am not convinced it's an existential threat to the population. Emphasisn on the people here, since a 'country' is nothing more than a social and mental construct that occupies a piece of inanimate land delimited by imaginary borders. Did Russia kill all the people in the lands it has currently occupied? Chechenya was annexed by Russia and has not been destroyed. There's a big difference between installing a new government in power and a genocide of the entire Ukranian populace. Do you really b…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:30 PM
2

Child abuse def counts. Violence is violence regardless of age but society thinks parents, specially single moms can do no wrong or that it's somehow justified.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 12:01 PM
1

It all depends on the person. There are bad apples on both sides.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:30 PM
1

Men have zero responsability to fight on wars started by other people. If a country can't defend itself throught aid and volunteer soliders then let it be destroyed.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 11:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter