OpineControversial Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	"Excuse me, Bus Driver, can you let me off up there instead? There's always sketchy people at the bus stop at this time of night." "What? No way. We only do that for women. Good luck." And we agree. Good show, and thanks for the statistics.	/r/MensRights	13/04/14 05:21 PM
1	"Excuse me, Bus Driver, can you let me off up there instead? There's always sketchy people at the bus stop at this time of night." "What? No way. We only do that for women. Good luck." I'm not disputing its accuracy in determining relative parity in rape reports for the year of 2010. I take issue with the suggestion that a single year's parity in rape reports means that men are, as a whole, equally likely to be the victims of rape, ignoring all evidence to the contrary for sake of one source's findings.	/r/MensRights	13/04/14 05:04 PM
-1	"Excuse me, Bus Driver, can you let me off up there instead? There's always sketchy people at the bus stop at this time of night." "What? No way. We only do that for women. Good luck." Everything but that 12-month study seems pretty solid. A single year's worth of statistics leaves a lot to be desired.	/r/MensRights	13/04/14 04:35 PM
-1	"Excuse me, Bus Driver, can you let me off up there instead? There's always sketchy people at the bus stop at this time of night." "What? No way. We only do that for women. Good luck." Those statistics seem hard to come by, likely in part to avoid making male rape victims feel marginalized, but men are the minority here. Generally, the number for the US seems to be around 9-10%. http://www.fris.org/SexualViolence/Male.html Wikipedia has an interesting article that breaks down rape on a gender-by-gender basis, though the sources leave a bit to be desired. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender Those conviction rates are pretty staggering. You can offer conjecture about an …	/r/MensRights	13/04/14 03:56 PM
-2	Women can't be sexist You call it justified anger, I call it the /r/atheism of activist subs.	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 07:49 PM
0	Women can't be sexist The credibility of the cause suffers for their clouded judgement, especially when they suggest ridiculous things like women controlling more political power due to greater numbers, which is the top fucking comment right now. It's willful ignorance for the sake of proving a point that was incorrect to begin with and I have more faith in the community here than to think that the actually believe that. Hinging your argument on a faulty premise and leaning on the support of the hivemind for validity…	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 01:39 PM
-1	Women can't be sexist At least in regard to political power, that's not really true. Power is held by those who have the most influence over those who legislate. Currently, that power is held by Fortune 1000 CEO's, 95.4% of whom are male. Power does not rest with the vote when the representative does not represent the majority. And economic power would have to be broken down a hell of a lot more specifically to make any real determination of power by gender.	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 01:11 PM
-13	Men are not to blame (from /imgoingtohellforthis) And you idiots wonder why people call this sub a circlejerk. -_-	/r/MensRights	21/01/14 06:07 PM