TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Opposite-Bullfrog-57 Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Opposite-Bullfrog-57 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Really? Samples? I respect women's freedom, especially freedom to sell sex. How the fuck is that disrespectful? I also respect my right to stay the fuck out from feminazi and women that are not libertarian
/r/MensRights29/10/23 04:53 AM
5

Fit my experience perfectly. So many people think that if a woman choose poor man then she deserves government subsidy. On the other hand a polygamist sugar daddies with a few women are called abusive exploitative even though all those women choose him.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/23 04:46 AM
1

US is relatively sane when it comes to palimony. In Australia and Canada you can't even sign a pre relation agreement. What's US is insane with is retroactive rape accusation. Say you let a woman live with you. You have sex together many times. Sometimes you fondle each other, get drunk together, do drugs. At that time she consented. And in return you lavish her. ​ Latter relationship broke out. Maybe she becomes a feminists or something. She can file rape charge 30 years after the fact and say …
/r/MensRights29/10/23 04:34 AM
6

Some people don't realize this is sarcasm
/r/MensRights31/05/23 01:54 PM
1

If you're not married it's a lot tougher to get you on the hook.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:22 PM
2

Don't get married obviously. What can a man do to avoid this?
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:13 AM
2

What I don't get it is we're not supposed to pay women but we should choose who we love and one of the benefit of being in a relationship with man is money. Why not just pay?
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:06 AM
1

Is prostitution legal? Is paying for it implies the woman is consenting?
/r/MensRights28/04/23 12:57 AM
1

Here is something unusual. What about if sex is always transactional and the more explicitly transactional it is, the better. Never look back.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/23 12:52 AM
6

That's the kind of problem with this kind of research. What counts as rape is hard to define. For example, you fuck a girl, she says stop, you do 2 more strokes, that can count as rape.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 12:28 AM
1

Do not get married. Have mistress.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 06:25 AM
1

We all get unconditional love from our family and only our family. The other love are conditional, i.e. transactional. What about women? Same. Why would I love a woman unless she is pretty and provide sex for me or she is a family member? I just don't care.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:55 AM
1

Censorship?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:35 AM
1

Which is why relationship must be transactional. Relationship is already transactional. And this is the proof of it. People leave when the other outlive their usefulness. So stop pretending otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:54 AM
2

Technically we have sex to have children. Even when it's no longer the case our instincts are still hardwired that way. Men that have sex with many women will have more children. Women are better of picking most handsome, tallest, richest, most powerful men. Men don't care how wealthy his women are as long as she is young and beautiful and smart. Women care. Sexual selection is different. In Asia, rich men get women easily. In US because sex cannot be transactional men has to be clowns finding w…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:08 AM
1

Don't get married.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 06:28 AM
1

Don't get married. Stop getting married. If you know that marriage law is unfair then don't. There is no way to reform this.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:36 AM
1

How to make sure you don't end up with women like that?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:26 PM
2

Is it illegal to buy sex? ​ Normally men pays. Tht's because men want sex more than women. So lock and key analogy makes sense in countries where you can't simply pay.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:24 PM
1

Read rich dad poor dad by robert kiyosaki
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:21 PM
1

Do online business or crypto trading. Almost no interpersonal skill needed.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:21 PM
0

Just ignore her
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:18 PM
2

Learn that most info are bullshit. Sex is always transactional. Make him learn economy, and then evolutionary psychology. Does he has high IQ? Autistic with low IQ is doomed. Can he code? Do internet marketing. Does he has bros? Autisitc people need bros to guide him.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:42 PM
3

Shouldn't that vermin get charged for false accusation?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:50 PM
1

Hard to measure values of unpaid labor because the monetary value isn't clear. Just make everything transactional and everything will show up on statistic. Fair or unfair can be decided by agreement.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 04:11 PM
2

Some are pro life, some are pro choice. But few wonder why women can abort but men cannot paper abort? What about if a woman doesn't want to be in that situation? Sign a contract with the man. Also if men doesn't want to support the children, and the woman cannot afford that either, abortion should be mandatory. Otherwise, other men will be forced to support the children through welfare.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:57 PM
0

Most men don't like to rape. What's the point of getting sex if not to produce children.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:49 PM
1

If we don't have income tax and all sex are transactional, this issue will sort things out. Just let them decide how much she is getting. She can pay him for lawn mowing and he can pay her to make sandwich and sex
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:48 PM
1

WHere is this? What's the age of consent there? What's the actual difference? Anyway someone in libertarian report this https://www.reddit.com/r/AskLibertarians/comments/125pav1/comment/je59mk1/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 ​ The 17 years old boy even cover for her teacher preventing her from being caught.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 02:53 PM
1

How many bullshit classes like this you got to take? Why not learn evolutionary psychology?
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:59 AM
2

So you do not know anything. You do not know what you are accused off. You paid lawyers and said nothing. They reveal nothing. I wonder if the preemptive lawyer is too expensive.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:57 AM
1

Show tits? Give sex? All gifts are payment. Really
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:54 AM
9

So they gonna work for 6 years and then find a good husband. What a waste of educational funding. OR be childless. What a way to remove smart women from gene pool.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:54 AM
11

This is what happened when women cannot be nice by men and rewarded by money for doing so. Basically in democracy, most people, we call them feminists and white knights want women to have strong incentive to hurt men. The idea is prevent women from doing win win deals with men and be rewarded for it.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:52 AM
-11

When I was 14 I saw porn. Am I abused?
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:41 AM
3

Women should be taxed more to accommodate their longer toilet time.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:13 PM
1

The rule wasn't even clear right?
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:12 PM
1

Women that provide sex for money is NOT parasitic.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:29 AM
35

They accused me of being a misogynist even though I had never met them. Then when I asked why do people think I am a misogynist, given that I have never hit or hurt any women and they said I disrespect women. I wanted to ask why they think I disrespect women till I realized things that are supposedly on my head is a very easy accusation that can never be proven or disproven easily.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:33 AM
1

Not in south east asia either https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-home-or-kids-together-but-couple-still-spouses-appeal-court-rules I am not even sure if this is the case. I think I read a case where the woman declare that she is married and the guy says no, we're not. And the judge sided with the woman anyway. In fact, the case is famous not because it's common. The case is famous that the judge side with women even without cohabitation. I found it weird that you can't pay women for sex but…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:05 AM
1

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/palimony-when-is-it-awarded-48731 In US it's rarely awarded. It's still a threat.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:00 AM
2

Wrong. There are cases where women sue for alimony even though they're not married. I think it's a state in US. In most states this bullshit is no longer there. But in some states that still recognize common law marriage it's an issue.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:55 AM
1

But why would a private schools promote wokism? Shouldn't they teach children to embrace capitalism? Wouldn't that be what parents want? Why would parents send their kids to schools teaching woke
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:19 AM
0

There is nothing wrong with wanting sex from women and ONLY from beautiful smart women There is nothing wrong with wanting money from men Prostitution should be illegal That being said, I can understand why many men and women don't think that way. If men mainly wants sex then ugly women will be out of the genepool.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:04 AM
4

South east Asia here. ​ I have never heard of any such laws. And western laws DO have something worse than forced marriage. It's called common law marriage. You don't want to get married but government declare you're married anyway and you know it when your gf sue for alimony
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:02 AM
3

No you don't. Many men can just run away. Or you can be like me, taking care of her outside marriage.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:00 AM
1

Many thing he said is spot on. Women do manipulate men
/r/MensRights16/03/23 06:04 AM
1

Do all judges have to make decisions like this?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:33 PM
0

Some republicans do I guess. I think trans that uses government money and encourage kids to do so are the main problems. I don't see many republicans hating gay. Many gay support republicans now.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:26 PM
1

I aim surprised. Why would a private school teach communism or any leftist bullshit? I think rich parents should put their children on capitalistic oriented school.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 10:10 AM
1

If men makes more money than woman why are women richer? https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/ ​ Simple. Because being a wife/girlfriend is actually a job and the pay is just off book. For example, a sugar baby may get $2k a month "allowance". That's actually income. A boyfriend may pay for all cost of living. That too is income. But that doesn't "count". If that same girlfriend because she is giving heirs to his sugar daddy only work 1 hour a week as casheer and the sug…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:37 AM
-2

Free market is not oppressive to anyone. Women are simply paid to give us children.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:33 AM
2

What does this really mean anyway? Can't make feminist teachers admit that feminism is bullshit because once she think it's bullshit she lost her job? ​ OR ​ Can't make a woke teacher admit woke is shit because once she learn that woke is shit she would have been a business woman instead?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:32 AM
2

Is this public or private schools?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:31 AM
3

Both should just be for celebrations
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:29 AM
3

I wonder if this is deliberate. Just so you know, terrorize man.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:26 AM
1

My understanding is child support is a punishment for rich men to have children and an incentive for moms to take away children from fathers. The women themselves cannot agree to a lower amount before conception. Imagine a woman that expects $1k a month of child support from a man and $50k a month of child support from another. However, the richer man doesn't want to knock her up if child support is at $50k a month. That woman will most likely prefer $5k child support from the richer man. But sh…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:18 AM
3

Is this a sugar baby from Russia? She gives you a child and then she does https://www.azcourts.gov/casa/Training/Training-Courses/MSBP ​ And government do nothing.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:09 AM
2

It's fraud not rape. Also men should be able to do paper abortion
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:59 AM
0

Who the fuck care women talk about men? ​ As long as it's true and useful so what? If it's positive it's bonus
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:52 AM
1

I read halfway. Interesting. Some from what I have read. Are we manipulated by cats too? I mean we do everything and cats just take us for granted. Also women manipulate men to get money. What about if the men don't mine? Life is always one human exploiting another. Women care about look. I am impressed that the book says women care about money. Different women are different I guess. Both are fine.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:48 AM
1

Just offer money. ​ Fortunately, prostitution is legal in my country. I think I am moderately attractive. I can easily, too easily get laid for that. But having the paying power means I got to pick who I want the most and who gives the most cost-effective offer. I like that. I also stick around to my biological children and have good genes (I am a mensa member) But before I made things transactional, I was often scammed. A woman always complains that I am not respectful or that I don't treat her…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/23 12:43 PM
1

LTR doesn't have to be monogamy. Just saying. Also don't get married either. I would suggest no long term commitments. That way if she misbehaves you can reduce her allowance. Having children is good though.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/23 12:25 PM
1

You should commit to no woman. Just pay her for sex and for giving you children and take care of her if she does the reasonable. Works for me. Well, at least till my mistress terrorize other sugar babies. I am still thinking how to solve that. But doing it my way means I don't have many problems you do.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/23 12:00 PM
1

In my country, just pay. You get the best pussy and pretty much fair deals. That's it. No marriage. You can try to make her like you. But in the end, all that matters is whether you get sex, whether you knock her up, how pretty and smart she is, and how cost-effective it is. Forget romance. All those are there to confuse me. I agree with redpiller. It's how to make women like you. The problem is you still want women to like you, and there's a lot of unknown. You should think about how much money…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/23 11:57 AM
1

What does it mean?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 10:56 AM
1

Wow. If a woman wants money and I said I won't pay unless I have sex with you, that's rape? That sounds like a fair deal. How does the law work?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:13 AM
0

And getting drafted? No fucking way. Go to Asian country instead.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:44 AM
9

Yap. But people call me crazy when I pointed this out. The pattern is. Men and women cannot make their own deal. The state dictate that the men has to pay women (not the child) and the amount has to be proportional to the man's income/wealth. It's just punishment. The purpose is to give incentive for women to backstab the men. Any arrangements that's mutually beneficial, like transactional sex is illegal.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:41 AM
1

If it's for the children, I am sure they can make a deal on their own and many men don't mind giving money to his own children. It's about punishing rich men for having children so money can go to welfare recipients instead.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:40 AM
2

All taxes are blue taxes. Men pay taxes. Women get subsidy. In fact, western civilization is effective matriarchy. Women can choose any men they want and some other men will pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:32 AM
4

How come threatening to leave is rape? Or what about threatening not helping one's career? This is why you shouldn't get married or commit anything. You should have right to leave anytime.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:31 AM
1

Sugarbook.com seeking.com WOmen want money. If they don't, I move on. What? I want very pretty women as my mistresses and I mainly have money. If she doesn't want money I can't get her cost effectively I moved on. What's important is not wasting time and money on stupid or ugly women or women that don't want to have sex with me. Makes things transactional. After a few "transaction" offer money to give me children. When everything is strictly transactional things tend to be fair. If she is freake…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:28 AM
19

For those who still think prenup is a solution. They had prenup. Not getting married is the solution. ​ Next legalize transactional sex and reproduction. If she disagrees on the amount you think is reasonable, move on to other women.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:07 AM
3

Does he ever agree explicitly on that? I mean this is why modern marriage sucks. But shouldn't this sort of thing be decided BEFORE they stay together? Why do we need laws regulating this? But anyone choosing to get married is kind of idiot anyway.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:04 AM
2

I get what you're saying too. Control your own mind and emotions so you can use it to control others and be free. If I come to your place I will ensure I got your permission and we can have a nice chat.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:17 AM
1

I am thinking of moving to a state or county, and then vote and win election there. And keep commies out. How? https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho\_Capitalism/comments/11htwt5/simple\_stepping\_stones\_ideas\_to\_turn\_federalized/
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:14 AM
1

These are your 2 mistakes. Lock your door. You do have choices. The only time you don't have choices is when you're already killed.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:05 AM
1

Both want women to pick the poor. Poor men can vote. Ugly women can't get someone rich. So they're envious.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:01 AM
1

We all should know the cost of child support and sex before we engage on it. It's common sense of fairness. Not knowing how much we should pay hurt women too. What about women that want money and prefer the rich?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:00 AM
1

And if not, move to states or even country where it is the most reasonable.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:59 AM
1

And that means don't get married. Pay. Don't marry. EVER.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:58 AM
1

Society treat women differently. So we need to resort to systems that work for lowest common denominator. Men commitments matter. Society will demand enormous amount of money from men. If you commit an inch, society will demand a mile. Women commitment doesn't matter. Women commitment to love and have sex with you in marriage doesn't matter. So? DO NOT COMMIT ANYTHING. DON'T play commitment game. Make things transactional. When I have children, I took care of my children because I love them not …
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:58 AM
1

I don't care if women want money from me. I also want sex from them. So? We want something from each other we trade. It's the only fair way to deal with women and anyone really. If you want drama free life, just make things transactional. Want children, pay women to give you children. Be financially supportive of your own children. Still work fine in my country.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:55 AM
-1

I mean they are capitalist in the sheet and socialist in the street. I am just pointing out that people are anti capitalist in the street. Deep inside, we are all greedier and more selfish than even capitalists.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:51 AM
1

Do you lock your door? Do you pay your tax? We lock our door to control others. Namely to prevent them from stealing our stuffs. We pay our tax because we fail to control others.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:50 AM
2

Republicans hate gay?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:59 AM
1

We just need to teach them how to do it right
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:58 AM
2

Shilarry agreed.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:57 AM
2

There is nothing wrong with that. What's wrong is to think the opposite is wrong. Men should objectify women too.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:57 AM
1

Wow. I thought we all want to control everything.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:56 AM
-9

Not it's not. It's just anti capitalism. Whatever make sense under capitalism they do the opposite. It hurts women too. It hurts women that pick the rich, and that's something that society want to do
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:55 AM
0

Can you give me source for stats? I want to post that on some group
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:54 AM
6

Yes it will collapse. I know the solution. Legalize transactional sex. Let people choose amount of child support.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:52 AM
1

So all subreddits are echo chamber
/r/MensRights05/03/23 12:39 AM
1

And those bad boys have ways to get laid. Feminists and white knight often prevent women from choosing rich guys. For example, child support is ridiculously expensive for rich guys. Marriage is of course, only for idiot man. I would run away if a woman even suggest marriage to me.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:36 AM
1

And that's the way it should be. I felt that it's not going farther enough. Why should society or women value economically unproductive men? Why should men in welfare have children burdening other men. Why should women that choose poor men get money from rich men? Those money could have gone to women that choose a rich man as father for their children
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:34 AM
5

What's wrong with age gap? Old women are not sexy. Old men with money? Well, I know it's easy to get pretty woman if you're rich and offer money. Maybe not in feminist countries but that's what many women want. And there is nothing wrong for women to want money. Employee wants salary. Why not women? Besides, they got to get pregnant for 9 months, of course they want money
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:21 AM
-1

Most leftists are like this. That's their tactic. They don't tell you what's wrong. They just insult you and then harass admins to kick you out. Why? Because they're the one that's wrong. Scammy products also use the same strategy. They just sue people that expose their scam.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:30 AM
3

You mean some men still want to get married?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:28 AM
8

Just legalize transactional sex. Sugar relationship is already legal. ​ Also reforms child support laws
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:28 AM
3

Why do they do that? Doing that make movies sell more?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:26 AM
3

Why isn't she in jail? The general rule of thumb that actually hurt women too is that women cannot commit to anything legally and are not held responsible for their action. Why does this hurt women too? Imagine if you cannot be held responsible to pay your loan. Nobody would give you loan. ​ While it may be advantageous to you and the thing looks like it benefit you, it's not. ​ Many men would want some women commitments to say not turning their children into trans or to keep child support reaso…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 05:20 AM
2

It's a shit test. Move on to other women. She wants to test if you're an idiot and put up with that shit. Or make everything transactional. If she doesn't give you sex, leave her. Making a straightforward cash offer for sex can be useful if it were legal. Many sugar daddies do that. Don't be Beta. Move on if she's not submissive.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 08:28 AM
17

Why do feminists think men are more capable fighters but not more capable CEOs, businessmen, and so on? Why do women think it's unfair that a group of people that won sports and are better fighters may also be better programmers and engineers than women? Feminists think that more CEOs are men due to "patriarchy". So why don't they think that men are more capable fighters due to patriarchy too and how exactly they plan to abolish that? ​ It puzzles me a lot.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 08:05 AM
1

There are many factors. Men compete with other men so many white knight men support laws that hurt other men. I would add more samples feminists promote. Lack of international sex trade is also against men. So men that don't want to put up with feminist nonsense cannot just hire foreign women as mistresses. In the absence of international or any competition, absurd laws can benefit women. Alimony, for example, can make women rich but would simply result in women not getting husbands if rich men …
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:55 AM
2

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/11/woman-who-impregnated-self-with-stolen-semen-from-billionaire-wins-child-support-battle/ This one is interesting. What about if the law is there to prevent men from protecting themselves against non consensual stuffs like this? Rape is illegal and I understand. But this is worse than rape.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:50 AM
1

About that child support and custody. I still don't understand why men and women cannot agree on some numbers before the child is conceived. Why should it be proportional to a man's income, and why can the woman not agree on a different number before conception? Why out of 50 states in US people insist that child support must be proportional to a man's (noncustodial parent) income? I think many more children will be born to rich men if child support is not proportional to income. https://coffman…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:46 AM
1

We can't disprove that can we?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:33 AM
1

I can think of many reasons. Many feminists are lesbians or ugly. So they are less likely to have win win relationships with men. so they tend to inflate numbers and portray consensual acts as non consensual out of jealousy against pretty woman that make lots of money selling sex in win win way. Inflating the number can promote support for laws against consensual sex. Feminists want men to pay woman for betrayal. Paying for sex is illegal but feminists love forcing men to pay child support or al…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:24 AM
0

I've heard that Jordan Petterson is forced to go into sensitivity training or lost his license. Also, what kind of psychologist expert can't differentiate men from women and encourage kids to change gender? Going to psychologists can be dangerous. So basically, a psychologist must be woke, and I would hate hearing any advice from woke.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter