TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OrangeAvocado Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by OrangeAvocado on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The top female athletes in the world are around (or below) the level of the top America male children in individual sports. Making the cut into elite military units like the SEALs, Green Berets, and Rangers, requires multi-disciplinary physical prowess. After years of trying, and preparatory programs that are designed to help them make it, and multiple attempts by some of the fittest women in the military, NOT EVEN ONE has even made it through the IOBC (Infantry Officer Basic Course). Not. One. …
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:44 PM
–

and for the women who can [perform to the standards] hehe... That's a good one. Unless they drastically lower the standards for elite units, NO women will pass them. Remember, the best female athletes in the world perform at about the same physical level (or less) of the best high school boys in the United States. Women Olympic track records - US high school boys track records Women power-lifting world records - US high school boys power-lifting records The entry requirements for elite military …
/r/MensRights30/05/15 10:54 PM
0

most don't want to kill them Searching for any place where I said that... .. Nope, Not there.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 02:02 AM
6

Look, I'm a big critic of feminism, but saying that any meaningful number of feminists are deep down glad a woman killed her son and think its empowering is insanity. I take it you're new here, then. Kill All Men, as one example among many. It's not that all feminists want to eliminate men en masse (but a lot of them do: the "respectable" ones want to do it through selective abortion, while the "bad" ones openly advocate genocide) but the "mainstream" feminist organizations are "strangely" retic…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:48 PM
–

Here are the feminist narratives. The one they say out loud: "The Patriarchy oppresses women, and she was clearly pushed into madness and desperation because of the Rapey McRaperson who was abusing her beloved child, so she did the only thing she thought she could do to protect him, because we all know judges always give abusive fathers unlimited access to their children. And don't you dare ask for evidence to support her claims of abuse - "evidence" is misogyny and we all know women don't lie i…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:10 PM
–

Also, who has EVER made fun of a rape victim? I have NEVER heard of anyone being blamed for being raped. Here you go. One of many. In our society the rape of a female is a horror on par with Pol Pot's Killing Fields. On the other hand, the rape of a male is a punchline.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 11:03 PM
1

My point is that the cops shouldn't be obligated to show up when they KNOW the call is bogus. If somebody calls 9-1-1 and drops off the line the dispatcher doesn't know what the problem is: it could be someone having a heart attack or bleeding out, so it makes sense to send someone. But when a mombie calls 9-1-1 to report the mere presence of man with a child, the proper response SHOULD be, "Call us if you want to report an emergency or a crime in progress, otherwise stop monopolizing this line …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:36 PM
–

Here's what I don't understand: why did the cops even show up? Here's how it should play out when some crazed mombie calls about a "suspicious man." Dispatcher: "9-1-1, what is your emergency?" Crazed Mombie: "There's a man with a child in the mall parking lot at 4th and Elm!" Dispatcher: "Is that all?" Crazed Mombie: "I think he might be a pedophile!" Dispatcher: "What is he doing to make you think that?" Crazed Mombie: "Well he's not really doing anything... but he looks suspicious!" Dispatche…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:31 AM
5

No... he was saying that a feminist publicly speaking the truth about false rape claims - because a man near her was falsely accused - is a rare thing. It happens, but not very often (unlike false rape claims, which happen all the time).
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:19 PM
–

I, for one, couldn't care less. The University President and the Dean of Students could have - and should have - put the kibosh on the entire mattress stunt to begin with. "Emo Emma" Sulkowicz should have never been allowed to carry the mattress around the campus at all. The fact that the very people on that stage allowed that farce to go on for as long as it did, knowing that they were endorsing a slanderous "statement" against an innocent student (yes, endorsing, by being coy about proclaiming…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:49 PM
2

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that if a woman went in wearing a shirt that said "Australia First Party" on the front, with a big Aussie flag on the back, she would find out pretty quickly that they aren't particularly "inclusive" or "non-judgmental" about political beliefs, either... despite what the sign says. SJW's are a joke, and they don't even realize that "they" are the punch-line.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:16 PM
–

A woman breaks into a stranger's house and rapes a man who is not conscious and gets a slap on the wrist.<sup>1</sup> Meanwhile... an Angry Mob Breaks into Jail, Beats Rape SUSPECT to Death, while police dither with ineffective methods of dispersing the crowd. Equality! <sup>1</sup> It is worth noting that if she turns up pregnant from this, the victim will be held liable - under threat of prison - to make child support payments to her for the next 18 years.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:30 PM
–

Actually, women rape men and boys all the time. In particular, statutory rape of boys by grown women usually devolves into a bunch of people saying how "lucky" the kid is, and comments like, "I wish I had teachers like that when I was in seventh grade." And when you count "made to penetrate," and women having sex with men who cannot give consent, female-on-male rape is nearly as common as male-on-female rape, although male-on-male rape in prisons is more common than either type... and was the re…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 01:45 AM
–

Well said, but I have a minor correction: If anything rape is made to be one of the worst crimes someone a male can commit against another person a female. All other forms of rape are punch-lines in today's culture.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:22 PM
1

Well... 70-cents-on-the-dollar is just plain, old wrong. Even the most twisted way to look at the statistics yields 77 cents. But we all know that when they say "XX-cents-on-the-dollar" they are implying that men make more for the same work, rather than acknowledging the fact that men are simply more productive than women are on average... AND they're ignoring the millennial generation, AND the fact that single women who pursue careers like men do make more than men. But... there is the slightes…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:20 PM
–

From the article: “But there is still a glass ceiling, and women are still earning just 70 cents on the dollar” earned by men, Morgan said. Uh... no. If a bogus statistic that was never true, and has been thoroughly debunked over and over for more than 40 years is all the justification they have for assessing slave-status<sup>1</sup> on men, preventing them from performing their designated slave duties, and then punishing them for failing to do what they are being prevented from doing, then ther…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:05 PM
–

“Every MLK week I commit myself to not spending a dime in white-owned businesses. and every year I find it nearly impossible.” I just realized that she thinks there's such a thing as MLK week. It's a day - nobody gets a week. Since she's going to teach at B.U., she of all people ought to know that MLK plagiarized a significant portion of his doctoral thesis when he was a student at that very school. Boston University Panel Finds Plagiarism by Dr. King. I bet she deserves the title "doctor" about…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:53 PM
3

Why don't you look at the positions held by feminist organizations, then? In the U.S., the National Organization for Women (NOW) is about as "mainstream feminist" as you can get - and their official platform supports every misandrist, whack-a-doodle, female supremacist, man-hating initiative out there. They're against equal custody, they deny the prevalence of false rape accusations, they talk about DV only as something that men do to women, they campaign against religious freedom, they favor qu…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:42 PM
1

Get off your high horse, son - you're a young, inexperienced, burger-flipping student... with no money and a crazy baby-momma, so forgive me if I'm not completely convinced that you have everything all figured out. I've accomplished far more in my life than you have, and I have the scars - and the accolades - to prove it. I wasn't trying to pile on, but since you doubled-down, I feel compelled to respond for the sake of other guys reading who still have time to avoid your mistakes. Despite your …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:26 PM
–

Not to pile on you, but... It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. You reproduced with a single mother (bad idea) who is a nut-job (another mistake) when neither of your situations allowed for it (strike three)... and to make it worse, her family has an inside track into the local legal system because her father is a cop (the icing on the cake). None of that is of any use to you now, but maybe some other guys will avoid your mistakes in their own lives.…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:43 PM
7

Until very recent history, the vast majority of men did not have many legal rights, either. Also, women had many VERY significant privileges that men did not have (such as not being sent to fight in wars). I don't see feminists grabbing their rhetorical hammers to smash that particular aspect of "the patriarchy."
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:33 PM
–

True, since the word "controversial" has come to mean little more than, "Anything that is not in 100% agreement with every "ism" - and in complete agreement with every narrative - believed by any group to the left of Ronald Reagan." Example: The IQ bell curves for men and women have the same mean, but the one for men is slightly flatter. That has little impact for the vast majority of people, but it does mean that the farther you get from the mean, the greater the ratio of males-to-females... so…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:24 PM
–

^ True. For a long time, whenever I tried to tweak my food intake by cutting fat I was always hungry and I eventually realized that it wasn't worth it to me to spend my entire life being miserable for the sake of a few pounds and inches (I was never really big - just "rounder" than I wanted to be). Now I realize that all the dietary stuff I was taught as "settled science" for all those years was wrong (which is something that should give everyone pause with regard to all sorts of subjects). Afte…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:14 PM
6

Wars actually increase GDP thereby boosting the economy for most citizens at the aggregate level. Broken Window Fallacy
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:00 PM
3

When I was a teenager I was thin, short, had horrific acne and braces on my teeth, and a mild case of Tourette syndrome - none of which were in the least bit under my control. Guess what? I was, at best, ignored by girls... at worst I was mocked for being some sort of freak. If there was some "movement" to convince girls to like guys like me, I can assure everyone that I never heard of it... ... but I worked on myself. I bulked up some. I eventually grew out of my acne. My braces eventually came…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:51 PM
1

I would love to see some data on this. My pleasure. There have been plenty of studies of this going back decades. Probably the best and most reader-friendly one is by former gun-control advocate Professor John Lott of the University of Chicago - More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws is a good place to go. This is from a review of the latest edition of the book: On its initial publication in 1998, John R. Lott’s More Guns, Less Crime drew both lavish praise and heated cr…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:14 AM
6

It's not accurate to attribute the wild-@$$ misandry and double-standards we see every day to "Mutant Feminism." This has always been the inevitable result of starting down the road that began at Seneca Falls, New York in 1848. It would be much more accurate to say that we have now arrived at the stage of "Mature Feminism."
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:49 PM
3

Thanks. I didn't see that the first time I read it. I think the bottom of my screen had an ad that covered that sentence.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:17 PM
9

The one point in my life when I was dating two women at the same time, they knew about each other. I did it because I'm not the duplicitous type, but it turned out well... a woman who wants to be with you will try harder when she knows you can easily replace her. It's called "pre-selection" - and it works for men. It usually does not work the other way, though. If a girl I was interested in wanted to date other people, I quickly lost interest in her, and I certainly would not offer any commitmen…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:01 PM
–

Stop focusing on my daughter as a victim, start looking at men in their weak areas of study, figure out how to increase their numbers in college so my daughter will be able to meet an educated, professional man in her future. In other words... Boys get the shaft and girls get the Moon. Fix this so that my daughter can marry well.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:29 PM
–

I see you haven't studied this issue - I'm not "jumping to conclusions": I've studied this for decades. The causative relationship between strict gun control and violent crime (in the United States in particular) is not in dispute by reputable analysts - gun control fosters the conditions that allow violent crime to prosper, and most of the major population areas (with the highest rates of violent crime) in the US have had some of the strictest gun control laws on Earth for many years. Places th…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:20 PM
–

You're buying into the hype: the poor don't really pay taxes in the US on net. Sure, they pay taxes on income and purchases, but government programs give it all back to them, and then some. Divide the US population into economic quintiles: the bottom three receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes, the fourth quintile just about breaks even, and the top quintile makes up the entire rest of the difference... in other words, the bottom 60 percent receive more in benefits than they pay in tax…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:59 AM
1

Cosmic radiation is going to be a much more pressing problem than space-rape. Mars has no magnetic field and virtually no atmosphere - two things that are indispensable to terrestrial life. Because of that, the surface of Mars is subject to space weather phenomena that are lethal to humans unless they have significant shielding (which means they either have to carry it with them (not feasible) or use Martian material (also not feasible). In addition, humans would need actual underground bunkers …
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:54 PM
–

That's just the point - she should NEVER walk free... period. She committed cold-blooded murder in a particularly gruesome fashion. She ought to die in prison - not after 40 years, though, but after 40 minutes, since her guilt is not in dispute. I would also like to inform you that developed nations with shorter prison sentences have lower crime rates. They also tend to have much more homogenous populations, and some of them also have stuff like caning... so there's that. Anyway, very few Americ…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 10:15 PM
2

Great example debunking the idea of "male privilege," but I have to point put that this story is from January 2014 and has been posted on this sub quite a few times already.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 09:02 PM
–

I'm fairly certain that the victim is still going to be dead in 40 years, why should she walk free before that?
/r/MensRights09/05/15 08:57 PM
–

I dated a woman... [with] little kids... That was your first mistake.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 08:45 PM
1

I see your point, but remember that "black" is a designated victim-group, while "male" is not. So... the first five are mostly straw-man statements, anyway. They don't mean anything concrete but they allow the writer to pretend to be a "myth-buster" or a "truth-teller." There is a bit of truth within the "myth" you mentioned, in the sense that people who have short time horizons, poor impulse control, and make bad decisions in general usually do so in all areas of their lives, and not just one. …
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:27 PM
–

What a load of crap: MYTH #1: Men can’t control their anger - Nobody claims that (except for some feminists) MYTH #2: Men can’t control their sexual urges - Nobody claims that (except for some feminists) MYTH #3: Alcohol causes men to be violent - It's a contributory factor for all sorts of things since it tends to lower inhibitions for both men and women. MYTH #4: Violent men had violent upbringings - Considering what the average feminist would consider violent if the person was a woman, virtua…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:48 PM
1

Excellent! I don't have a facebook account, nor any knowledge of how to see someone else's. I trust she's getting a well-earned scolding.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:51 PM
–

You're probably correct. I think the best thing would be for her to be forced to delete her facebook account first (so there's no way to track back to him) - then print the screen-shot her name highlighted and anything specific about him blacked out. He deserves protection - she deserved to be outed.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:47 PM
–

Even if you're a child. Arizona Kansas Ohio California Florida (This article is about a different case, but the rape victim being forced to pay child support to his rapist is mentioned in the 11th paragraph.)
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:42 PM
–

You're right - the question is: Why didn't they publish her name and picture? They do that to innocent men who've been accused - they could have easily taken a screen-shot of her facebook face with his name blacked out.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:19 PM
0

You're just trolling now, and I tire of feeding you. kthxbye
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:11 PM
1

You wanted a case where a neighbor called in a report of abuse and the police arrested the man even after the woman said she wasn't abused and had no injuries - because you don't think it has ever happened even once. It took me all of about three-minutes of Google searching to find one. I linked you a case where a neighbor called in a report of abuse and the police tazed (and likely arrested) the man even after the woman said she wasn't abused and had no injuries. You're right - that's a huuuuuu…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:01 AM
0

Find me one case (one) where a neighbour made a complaint about screaming and the man was arrested for abuse despite his partner making no accusations and her having no injuries. Just one. I dare you. Too easy. It's unclear whether they arrested the guy, but they tasered him although he was posing no threat to her, the cops, or anyone else. Anyhow, there's this new thing called the internet that allows you to find stories like that in a couple of minutes - which is how long it took me to find th…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:08 AM
3

In this context, they were: they hunted men and gathered women and loot.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:28 AM
0

You don't understand how these things play out in at least 21 of the 50 states in the US on a daily basis. You're displaying ignorance, not sagacity.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:25 AM
–

If this is what has become of American womanhood, then it's past time to revisit the idea that they should be allowed to vote, sign contracts, initiate divorce, or have sole custody of minor children. To any feminist lurkers on this thread: this is your chance to prove that you're not just a bunch of misandrists. This woman-child and her female supporters are claiming that grown, college-educated women have less agency than what we routinely expect of 10-year-old boys. Where are your condemnatio…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:35 PM
–

I read it - did you? The neighbor called and alleged abuse. The fact that the wife said nothing happened doesn't mean that he wouldn't be arrested: the idea is that "abused women" will cover for their "abusive men" when the cops arrive, so a third-party allegation is all it takes for "probable cause" to arrest the man.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:22 PM
5

Here Are 7 Undeniable Examples of Male Privilege in Your Daily Life Undeniable? Nope: I categorically deny all seven of them. Or... if we're going to count "I can pee while standing" as a privilege, then "I can give birth" more than compensates for every biological advantage men have about 20 times over. So whether we're setting the bar high enough to include just real privileges, or setting the bar low enough to encompass the first-world rich-white-girl problems feminists are always whining abo…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:18 AM
–

You must not be familiar with the law in many US states - twenty-one states have something called "Mandatory Arrest" laws. They dictate that whenever anyone calls the cops for a domestic dispute, the cops MUST arrest someone, regardless of the circumstances. And who do you think they arrest if there's a man and a woman? The man. From the Stop Abusive and Violent Environments website: The American Bar Association has identified 21 states with mandatory arrest for domestic violence assault (1). On…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:45 PM
–

Are you really that dense? Nobody is saying that he's a danger because he's looking through computer files - they're saying he's a danger because he has been seen in the vicinity of a school, and all their "recommendations" involve keeping their kids safe from the dreaded stranger danger. And none of this would have happened if it was a female.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:13 PM
1

I notice that you declined to answer. Big surprise /s
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:06 PM
–

So... you want to withdraw your words while pretending that I'm putting words in your mouth? Got it. In the context of defending the flyer, you wrote, "If someone is snooping around my child's school without a reason to be there..." Why did you choose the word "snooping" in this context if you didn't think the guy was snooping in this context? You could have chosen any word you wanted, including "present" - but you didn't: you went straight to a word that implies nefarious intent with regard to …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:58 PM
–

What does "look dodgy" mean to you? The problem is that you and the whack-a-doodle principle think "is male" is enough to classify a child-free man with no criminal record as worthy of publishing an alert about as a possible pedophile casing the school for victims.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:46 PM
–

Yeah, a pedo. YOU are the one who implied that his mere presence was snooping. Pray tell, what did you mean by that, or do you want to withdraw your insinuation that he's looking to do some good-ole-fashioned kid-rapin'?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:42 PM
–

If someone is snooping around my child's school without a reason to be there... Why do you assume that the guy is snooping? Snooping clearly implies bad intent. Essentially, you are accusing the guy of being a pedophile for the simple reason that some paranoid "mombie" doesn't know why a man she doesn't know is in the vicinity of a public building without clearing it with her first. Guess what?... she doesn't own the public property on which those schools sit, and she is not responsible for the …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:41 PM
24

Shocking security video demonstrates exactly why you should never play with fire at a petrol station, or refuse a smoke to a desperate woman. So... a woman approaches a man she (presumably) doesn't know and asks him to do something dangerous on her behalf (light a fire next to a running gas pump). And when he declines, she commits an act of arson that causes significant damage and could have easily killed at least two men. The lesson: "men should always obey any woman - whenever or whatever she …
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:16 PM
1

... and yet there are people on this sub who will argue that sociology is a science because the wikipedia "definition" says so.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:01 PM
–

Aaaaand, here's another money-quote from the regulation [emphasis added]: Prenuptial agreements are ignored by the federal need analysis process. After all, two individuals (parent and stepparent) cannot make an agreement between them that is binding on a third party (the federal government). The federal government considers the stepparent a source of support regardless of any prenuptial agreements to the contrary. If a stepparent marries the parent, he or she is considered responsible for suppo…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:52 PM
5

"... you're part of my problem as a woman." I'm okay with that.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:03 PM
3

If Hillary Clinton had not married Bill Clinton when he was still a nobody from Hicksville, USA (and didn't know how much better he could have done), she would be an ambulance-chaser in Little Rock, Arkansas that nobody outside of the 501 area code would have ever heard of. She certainly would never have been a senator or the US Secretary of State. She only has three things going for her: name recognition because she married a nobody who later became President, ambition that is so far beyond her…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter