TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Orisi Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Orisi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

It's the government's job to review services and ensure that what they're being funded for remains fit for purpose. If they're reviewed and the council find they're pumping huge amounts into a service that refuses to serve 50% of the population, when other services may support 100%, they're going to redirect funds towards that charity instead to provide better services in the community. That's the council's job at the end of the day, to make sure theyre spending on services properly.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/21 03:05 PM
6

Good job being a dick isn't a crime, and consent can't be retroactively withdrawn.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 04:29 PM
1

Eh, you could swing it a few ways. He may have had projects he'd already committed to to wrap up, and he may have wanted to secure himself more financially before giving up (yeah he made movies but it's not like he's Dwayne Johnson level rich, and if you haven't accounted for suddenly losing your wife you may not have been financially prepped for it).
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:41 AM
1

Pretty much. There's like 4 Honey I Shrunk The... Franchise productions in there, the first having been filmed before his wife's death. The kids were born in '88 so he basically started phasing out, and stopped by the time they were 9 to be a dad full time. Everything else he did was small voiceovers in kids movies (so stuff he can do locally and 9-5).
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:44 AM
3

He started doing a few things here and there again a few years back as his kids have gotten older. The occasional guest appearance, small time stuff to keep busy etc
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:40 AM
13

No, what he's saying is that he recognised that what they've lost was of immense value, and that the only way he could fill that void was to try and make himself even more present and available than he had been before. He gave up everything he was doing to provide for his family in his career, to do everything he could to try and minimalise the impact of such a profound loss.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:39 AM
4

No, I'm saying the fetish was his and not hers. Rape requires a lack of consent. We argue that consent cannot be given by children. To the US he was well under the age of consent, in some countries he is over the age, in the UK he's less than a year short of consenting. Again. I'm not saying what she did was right. I'm not saying it was legal. I'm saying comparing this to a man forcibly pinning down a girl and penetrating her, OR EVEN to a woman forcibly restraining a boy and forcing him to pene…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 09:04 PM
-3

You're getting downvoted but you're right. There's a difference between calling for more fairness in the charging of men of these crimes, and decrying this just because men are treated differently. If you actually give a shit about men's rights, you should be calling for better, fairer trials, not for this trial to be tried unfairly just because you feel a man would have been.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:37 PM
5

HE received pleasure from it. Not her. That's a disingenuous comparison. If someone DIDNT have a foot fetish and went around giving children footrubs because the children wanted them and THEY enjoyed them, well it gets a bit more complicated then. To be clear I'm not saying it makes it right, I'm saying it's not a fair comparison OP made.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:29 PM
4

But they don't owe for the month. They owe for at least a year, maybe two or three depending on how long theyve been failing to do it properly. Could be four years worth of Thot taxes that arent reported properly.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/18 06:22 AM
7

It would if there was a ton of "POLICE IN ACTION THIS IS A RESTRICTED AREA DO NOT OBSTRUCT" signs all over the place. Like there are all over the entrance to any of these places in like, a dozen languages.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 06:21 AM
4

Huh, my fiancee went to Worcester. Small world.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:31 AM
1

And I totally sympathise with that point of view. On an objective level the greater good is absolutely to bring the rapist to justice. That being said, as I've suggested in another reply, if you have a serious and legitimate reason to believe they will never get justice due to their power or influence, I can understand why you would want to get some sort of compensation for your ordeal. Money doesn't fix the problem in the same way it does for a car, but, particularly in the US and other countri…
/r/MensRights05/11/17 08:00 PM
-2

Aaand this is why I try to avoid commenting here. There's always someone who has to turn it to an incel genderbitch about women.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 05:48 PM
5

Like I said, I'd rather see both. But that's why Life Insurance exists. Think of it with a different family member. Murdering a father of two who was the sole breadwinner. Clearly we WOULD ALL like to see the murderer behind bars. But pretending that a large compensation wouldn't be of measurable benefit to the family he leaves behind is short-sighted. Imagine the murderer was untouchable. They were rich, and powerful, and it was clear you were being resisted at every turn and he would never get…
/r/MensRights05/11/17 12:30 PM
3

And you're a reactionary who can't look at a bigger picture beyond their initial emotions. You think a hug and a good cry will make everything better for them. I want to give people the resources they need to try and get some semblence of recovery from their ordeal. Clearly that makes me a monster.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 12:28 PM
3

My point was that when a crime has been committed against you that has caused you suffering and pain, the feel good factor of protecting others from it, while getting no actual compensation for it, doesn't really help as much as being able to afford therapy and to look after yourself does. The money helps the immediate victim a lot more than good feels.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 12:04 PM
4

Imagine insurance didn't exist. Someone steals your car and totals it, you want them locked up, or you want to be able to spend money to try and get a new car, or get repairs done, and get back to normal? Ideally you want both. But once your car is totalled, the means to repair is a whole lot more valuable to you personally than the feel-good factor that he may be out of the public for a few months.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:58 AM
8

The worst thing about being the big guy is, when the law actually shows up, if you were in any way involved, you're the aggressor. Because you clearly had the upper hand, so that magically makes it your fault
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 12:56 AM
4

Which is why I'm saying that in this particular instance if they, the females, are convicted of perjury in his trial, showing him to actually be innocent as opposed to not guilty, he should be able to sue for restitution.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 05:42 AM
24

No, but they are guilty of perjury. If theyre charged with perjury that would normally give him grounds to sue regardless of the other law.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 11:38 PM
2

They asked her what the disability was repeatedly and pointed out the sign specifically claimed she was homeless. Granted they did say she doesn't have one, but if she does have one it's clearly not one severe enough to prevent her from all work based on how aged she worked that roadside.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/17 07:59 AM
5

Okay, it's more like the difference between shooting to scare and shooting to wound. SURE you didn't mean to actually hit them, but you still fucking shot at them, and that action has potential consequences even if they're ones you didn't intend. You take the photo, you share it with someone else, you're culpable if it gets out there. The individual who shared it to everyone should be too, but the one who instigated the whole thing definitely should be, especially when her actions were still mal…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 06:19 AM
12

Think one crime is a bit more severe than the other. Doesn't even say he broke the wing mirror, just that he kicked at it.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:26 AM
5

I want to know why the hell they even GOT a warrant for his phone. Given his charges and why he was there they had no reason whatsoever to look into his phone outside of vindictive cops wanting to fuck some kid over who annoyed them.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 03:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter