| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1007 | Washington Supreme Court rules the state cannot put the burden on rape defendants to prove that an alleged victim consented | Progress | Oroso | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 10:12 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | Washington Supreme Court rules the state cannot put the burden on rape defendants to prove that an alleged victim consentedThey tried to force an affirmative defense because the court's precedent before this case made it that way. From the ruling: We held in State v. Camara, and reaffirmed in State v. Gregory, that notwithstanding the "conceptual overlap" between consent and forcible compulsion, the defendant may be tasked with proving consent by a preponderance of the evidence...Today, we...reject the due process precedent set in Camara and Gregory as both incorrect and harmful. This court in Camara held that in ra… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/14 05:59 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter