TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OscarWardProductions Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by OscarWardProductions on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

To me calling it MGM reduces the severity of FGM. Because it's not mutilation for men is it?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:14 PM
-1

Over eight million have experienced Type III, which is predominant in Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan.[12] The practice is an ethnic marker, rooted in gender inequality, ideas about purity, modesty and aesthetics, and attempts to control women's sexuality.[13] It is supported by both women and men in countries that practise it, particularly by the women, who see it as a source of honour and authority, and an essential part of raising a daughter well
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:13 PM
-2

No. But if we're look5ibg at priorities here brutal torture should be stopped before physical assault
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:52 PM
1

Does the thought of what it actually is. Mutilation. Scare you?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:01 AM
-1

I agree. Consent is the only thing that makes circumcision acceptable.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:47 AM
-3

Thanks for being one of the few here to put together a sound argument, I generally agree, however I still believe that FGM is a larger issue at the moment as it is not only a invasive brutal act, it is also shameful and degrading. Also circumcision wise, female genitalia comes off far more damaged than male genitalia. And I do have a good grasp, it happened to me at the age of 13 due to medical issues and it was my choice.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:35 AM
-10

Predictable MRA saying his voice is being crushed. How fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:27 AM
-11

My previous comment has just muted your sentiment. I was talking about this http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ very differnt to episiotomy
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:17 AM
-9

Probably not that much but it is a practice that has fewer risks. Also there has been some evidence to suggest that it can prevent HIV/AIDS by up to 60% http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/ by
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:13 AM
0

Yeah I agree with that.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:11 AM
-6

Is the patient has conditions such as phimosis then it is a very useful procedure. Talking from experience here buddy.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:08 AM
-8

I have never heard of such a case, also FGM is referring to the practice of mutilation not medical procedure carried out by a trained professional.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:07 AM
-5

Well obviously, but it seems that many MRAs say that the two are the equivalent and just as bad. Also circumcision is removing a small amount of insignificant skin, nothing more. Don't try and tell me otherwise, sure it's a little painful if it's in the teenage years but if it's for medical reasons then it's fine. I do disagree with the obligatory religious side of it, however doing it at birth would be the best time to do it.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:06 AM
-12

It's mountains and molehills, there's nothing sexual about circumcision, it is just making things easier for some. For some people it is unnecessary true, but fgm is completely pointless and just brutal. They shouldn't be put in the same category.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:54 AM
-17

FUCKING BULLSHIT. YOU CANNOT COMPARE THE TWO. FGM IS BRUTAL. Circumcision DOES NOT EVEN COMPARE.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter