Otterable Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	I'm not sure if this belongs here but I believe it's relevant! If she was expressly unqualified, sure, but firing someone just because there is a better candidate is pretty fucking cold.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/01/21 02:26 AM
13	Figured this belonged here. I don't think anyone is trying to say that 300k isn't a drop in the bucket compared to billions. It's more that getting a 300k interest free loan is ridiculously beneficial when trying to start a business. It's also an example of social mobility from upper class to elite wealth, which isn't usually what people refer to when they say 'humble beginnings' Many lower middle class families pass down more money than that idk what your definition of lower middle class is, but that's a chunk of change t…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/04/20 05:05 AM
3	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" Oh fuck off you troll I know I should have left this convo a while ago. Please don't rape anybody.	/r/MensRights	08/03/17 12:03 AM
2	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" You know what, that's a fair critique of my point. I will redact that claim because I don't have evidence. Now please address the rest of the post. Did you just make up nonsense and say it's the truth? Do you have evidence to back up those claims about young boys and girls fucking their teachers? It's not ethical for adults to seduce children and how successful the children are after getting abused by their teachers in no way justifies that abuse. You are bashing right wing politics but you are …	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 11:52 PM
3	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" Did you just make up nonsense and say it's the truth? Do you have evidence to back up those claims about young boys and girls fucking their teachers? Yeah DNA is different but development is pretty similar regardless. It's not ethical for adults to seduce children and how successful the children are after getting abused by their teachers in no way justifies that abuse. You are bashing right wing politics but you are using their most recent strategy. Saying "it's true, everyone knows it" instead …	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 11:40 PM
4	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" What are you even trying to say right now? Yes the seduction of young girls is absurd. So is the seduction of young boys. What you are doing is absurd. Child abuse is bad. Rape is bad. but typically in a way that will benefit him later. How and where do you ever see this? You are just saying things you want to be true and defending it with hot air.	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 11:22 PM
2	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" Ok so first of all, I'm not sure why you chose the desires of a 16 year old and the desires of adults as the things you want to compare. Like yeah, the fact that 16 year olds like to have sex is different that adults wanting 16 year olds to get seduced. But if you asked me if I want schoolboys or schoolgirls to get seduced by their teachers I would say no to either and if you asked me if both 16 year old boys and 16 year old girls fantasize about their teachers I would say yes they do. Again tho…	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 10:57 PM
6	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" I'm not subbed here, but the reason they reach /r/all in this case is because it's such a clear double standard. Men are incredibly privileged in society, but this is one area in which men are totally justified to be upset. This isn't men being babies, it's child abuse and rape. The fact that people like you think it's men being babies is the real tragedy to which these posts are trying to bring attention. edit: Just noticed this: In most cases that would be a sweepingly accurate claim. Do you h…	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 09:54 PM
4	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" If a schoolboy could have sex with a hot 26 year old, they would probably enjoy it and it would be a great life experience. Stop babbling gibberish about individuality and containers when the exigence of the conversation is you making sweeping incorrect claims about schoolboys.	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 09:45 PM
6	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" What ethos do you have that allows your assumptions about human nature to trump our laws, and how can you then claim that the laws assumptions are naïve? This very instance is clear example of man who was emotionally damaged by their relationship with an older woman. Your assertions about men and women are the ones falling apart, maybe you should quit being willfully naïve and stop imposing them situations in which they don't fit.	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 09:18 PM
9	Philly Judge: "If you were a male and it was a 16-year-old female, people would be outraged and screaming for blood" Regardless if they are a man or a woman, no teacher should be having sex with their student, the power disparity is just too large and a 16 year old doesn't possess the maturity and decision making ability to have an adult relationship with a 26 year old. This is the reason statutory rape laws exist in the first place. The fact that you think there is such a difference between men and women in this regard really represents a social double standard subreddits like these are trying to point out. S…	/r/MensRights	07/03/17 09:05 PM
1	Male privilege. Looks good to me. I didn't mean to come off as nitpicky, I just get finnicky when I see people arguing what is probably the correct stance, but not necessarily doing it in the right way, because then the people who disagree can try to justify ignoring you based off of some rhetorical concern rather than actual evidence.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 06:21 PM
1	Male privilege. I'm not particularly upset over it. You just seemed to encourage it by saying it's better that they change their original claim. I disagreed. We can call the discussion quits here. Have a good day.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 06:18 PM
1	Male privilege. Well I feel like being deceiving and unfair kinda makes the logical consistency moot. The exigence for the whole argument is the original claim, and changing it just moves the goalposts.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 06:08 PM
1	Male privilege. It makes the statements logically consistent, but I feel like it's just being deceiving and unfair to the other side of the discussion.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 06:03 PM
3	Male privilege. It's definitely not better, because then they aren't backing up the claim that was originally questioned. I'm not saying it was a wrong claim about violent crime (it's probably true) but you can't just say something, get questioned, not provide a proper source, then pretend like you said something else all along. That isn't fair to the person questioning you.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 05:59 PM
4	Male privilege. You could, but the person who replied to you might not have questioned your claim if it was about homicide so changing your original claim isn't super fair to them because now it looks like the are questioning a homicide statistic instead a violent crime one. The better thing to do would be to find a source about all violent crime, not one only about homicide. I really don't have a stake in the argument here, I'm just pointing out the logical progression.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 05:51 PM
5	Male privilege. I think they are pointing out that your original claim is about violent crime, not homicide, but your source is only about homicide.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 05:44 PM
4	50/50 It's why people put /s on the end of their comment.	/r/MensRights	03/12/16 02:29 PM
1	Tinder hero does not accept her double standard! Absolute savagery! And I think leading with being a pos is just as bad as escalating. We will agree to disagree.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/09/16 09:13 PM
1	Tinder hero does not accept her double standard! Absolute savagery! If being rude is in the wrong, they are both in the wrong.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/09/16 09:05 PM
3	Tinder hero does not accept her double standard! Absolute savagery! I just think it's unacceptable to push in a person's face something they have no control over when you are trying to establish enough mutual respect to potentially enjoy each other's company. While it could be wrong, I was under the impression that there was some sort of established date before this (hence the 'Are we still on then') and this girl didn't lead the conversation with a 'I don't like things about you that you have no control over'. lol or no lol, it's hostile either way and is a bad…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/09/16 08:21 PM
6	Tinder hero does not accept her double standard! Absolute savagery! You're right people have different preferences, but this is a scenario where a white lie or a simple 'no thanks' is much more acceptable than the truth. I really don't think if I matched with a girl on tinder and said "oh man I thought you were the white girl in that group photo, sorry I don't date black girls" it would be considered acceptable in any way, even if it is my personal preference. By qualifying a "yes, lets meet up" with a 'hey but you're really going to have to work hard to earn my…	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/09/16 07:19 PM