~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeI have awoken from my slumber, and now I haunt you once again with the desire to talk about false rape accusations and the Lisak study. I’d love to hop on a call with you. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 07:09 PM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeOk. Ok. Ok. I’m going to get brain worms if I keep talking to you in the comments like this. I just can’t do it. Either we’re speaking past each other, or you are intentionally ignoring the meat of what I say. I just read the Lisak study, and when I say I read it, I mean the whole thing. And I can tell you haven’t. I’d like to go over it with you tomorrow on a call so I can get your input on the results of the study, maybe over discord for example. My discord pin is #4705 and my username is TK-8… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 09:45 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of Justiceidgaf about what kinds of labs they were, to my knowledge that won’t change the kind of cases they take, I care about the goddamn cases they take. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 09:06 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticePasting this here too: Ok I couldn’t wait so I just took a look at the Lisak study, oh my god please spare me the stupidity. That’s it gloves off, I’m going to have to delve into some insults lol. I hope you know I still love this discussion, but insults are are not bad faith. “ All cases (N = 136) of sexual assault reported to a major Northeastern university over a 10-year period are analyzed to determine the percentage of false allegations. Of the 136 cases of sexual assault reported over the … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 09:05 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeOk I couldn’t wait so I just took a look at the Lisak study, oh my god please spare me the stupidity. That’s it gloves off, I’m going to have to delve into some insults lol. I hope you know I still love this discussion, but insults are are not bad faith. “ All cases (N = 136) of sexual assault reported to a major Northeastern university over a 10-year period are analyzed to determine the percentage of false allegations. Of the 136 cases of sexual assault reported over the 10-year period, 8 (5.9%… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 08:59 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeJust saw your edit about Lisak, thanks for the link I’ll take a look in the morning. I haven’t seen the Lisak study before, I don’t know what it’s about, I don’t know what the result was, I haven’t passed any judgement on it. Hearing that, duh, of course it’s not ok for it to only include 126 participants, the margin of error is too high. As to your suggestion that I’m playing word games, No. I am not, nor would I, ever play semantics. I hate semantics, and I hate when people try to spin what I … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 08:48 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeI’ll get back to you with a longer response in the morning. Here’s a short one for now: Yeah I have cognitive bias in favor of data showing that false accusations are less common, just like you have bias in favor of them being more common. That’s how our brains work. HOWEVER, that does nothing to change the fact that a study with 109 participants means absolutely nothing for something of this nature. I don’t need to read a study about rape that only includes 109 participants, no matter what is t… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 08:37 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticePlease stop gish galloping, I don't care about any of those things right now, we can talk about them in a conversation dedicated to them individually, I care about what I said in my comment, and next to nothing you said here addresses that. I'm talking about how the FBI only gets certain cases, which can explain the larger portion of falsities than normal, and the fact that these cases were likely not malicious false accusations. What I said was grounded in the language and data shared. As far a… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 08:11 AM |
| 1 | Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial by Edward Connors Thomas Lundregan Neal Miller Tom McEwen June 1996 U.S. Department of JusticeIt must be stressed that the sexual assault referrals made to the FBI ordinarily involve cases where (1) identity is at issue (there is no consent defense), (2) the non-DNA evidence linking the suspect to the crime is eyewitness identification, (3) the suspects have been arrested or indicted based on non-DNA evidence, and (4) the biological evidence (sperm) has been recovered from a place (vaginal/rectal/oral swabs or underwear) that makes DNA results on the issue of identity virtually dispositi… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 06:59 AM |
| 1 | The hashtag thoI pmed you | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 04:58 AM |
| 1 | The hashtag thooooh yay! I'll pm you - sorry I just got finished with another comment, I'm down to talk now | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 04:48 AM |
| 1 | The hashtag thoI haunt you now - wanna talk about mens rights? | /r/MensRights | 13/05/20 03:54 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter