TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Outrageous-Laugh1363 Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Outrageous-Laugh1363 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Making the man black makes it hard for them to dehumanize him, because they don't wanna appear racist. So they're in a bind. You'd be surprised. Sometimes they say heinous things about black men-racism under the guise of misandry-or something they're not even subtle about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/26 08:45 PM
3

Someone made the comment about the "man vs bear" discussion and liken it to adding black men. When you say that forest remark and add black man it is inherently different than the patriarchal structure that is being talked about in the first preposition. We all suffer under patriarchy. All of us. However, some suffer more. The problem also comes when most men do not call out other men about their anti woman bullshit. Uhhh, did it ever occur to you that the 'man vs bear' discussion INCLUDES black…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/26 08:44 PM
0

I agree with drafting all the lesbian, trans, and infertile women, no problem with that. Fair enough. Gross, but fair. Rape happens to men but they dont end up pregnant becuase of it. Men can and do become pregnant.
/r/ExRedPill28/12/25 03:52 AM
2

One large reason women are not drafted is they can have children. You need to understand if all the people who can make children are killed, that’s how an entire culture or country gets wiped out. So draft lesbian, trans, and infertile women? The last part is rape, rape is a weapon of war. They use it to get women pregnant with their children, this has been used in many wars it’s called weaponised rape. It has been used to wipe our ethnicities by raping women from that culture. It breaks up fami…
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:31 AM
1

War started by Putin, a man. Who has nothing to do with Ukrainian men. Christ you can't be serious. Conscription in Ukraine ended in 2013 but reinstated in 2014 by Yanukovych, a man, in response to the War in Donbas, started by, you guessed it, a man (Putin again). As of 2024, 20% of Ukraine's parliament is women (85 out of 401). How is this women's fault? It's the fault of both men and women. Women are complicit because they voted for this and have done nothing to try and stop it.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:30 AM
-1

Yes they did, women can vote in Ukraine and never did anything to repeal this or stop it. they thankfully dont have to do what you are forced to do. Yes, because women have huge privilege. The source of your resentment seems to be jealousy that they dont have to do what you do. Think about that and try to flip it: they thankfully dont have to do what you are forced to do. I'm amazed as to how much of a hateful condescending roach you'd have to be to someone going through the trauma of potential …
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:27 AM
1

Given that war is always started by men, Buckle up guys, it's time for the 'blame Ukrainian men for being drafted becaus of what Putin did, because they're both male gendered people!' women are violently mass raped and sexually tortured (knives, screws, glass being forced into their vaginas) in conquered land. Depending on the war, they get mass raped and impregnated to ethnically cleanse the population/ as a sign of power, or sharp objects are inserted in them as a means to torture them and ren…
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:26 AM
2

Wrong. Women in Ukraine voted directly to elect Zelensky, and have done jack shit to stop the male military draft.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:23 AM
0

I already touched that subject. Not even all countries in the west allow opt out from the pregnancy. You can't be this dense, can you? No country is forcing women en masse to be raped and carry their babies. RAPE. THAT is the equivalent to what Ukraine is doing-state imposed violence. Your argument would only make sense if women were forced into rape camps after war to repopulate. Which is of course a HORRIBLE thing-but it's basically what's happening to men in Ukraine.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:20 AM
0

What a garbage nonsensical comparison. Nobody is forcing pregnancy on women under legal duress. Men are literally being forced under LAW to be kidnapped to camps, trained for a week, then sent to go DIE. Women are NOT being legally mandated to be raped en masse then carry the babies. War conscription is state-imposed violence. Pregnancy is not. Being forcibly drafted by the state under threat of prison or death is not remotely comparable to biological reproduction. Even in countries with reprodu…
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:18 AM
1

Of course it is, women voted for Zelensky.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:15 AM
1

So why are you guys angry at black and gay men and brown men for abortion bans? They didn't do that to you-other white people did that to you.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:14 AM
1

It's also interesting that men don't protest the draft. Don't be ignorant. A simple google search will show you countless men protest the draft both now, as well as during drafts. There are tons of 'draft dodgers' in Ukraine and in ww2 too. It's not like women are campaigning for men to die so they can live peacefully. Wrong, sweetheart. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Feather_Campaign
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:10 AM
0

Zero women voted to remove zelensky because he is killing men en masse. Plenty of feminists are fine with the male draft, as evidenced by them doing jack shit about mass andricide. Are you out there protesting for the rights of women? So to answer his last sentence-none.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:09 AM
-1

Because they benefit from them, and are complicit in enabling it. Women can vote in Ukraine. They could stay and fight and support the men, but they don't. They flee the country en masse and fuck foreigners like cowards.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:04 AM
1

Yes, they contained men, something I have absolutely no issue with. Ok, so you just revealed yourself as a sexist roach who supports slavery, keeping people in the country and stopping them from leaving beccause of their gender. All of the things you wrote make sense now.
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:02 AM
0

Why don't you stop trying to put us against each other and start criticizing those who started the wars instead? They can both criticize putin, zelensky, and also criticize the women who fuck foreigners abroad while their husbands get blown to bits. Those who actually make the laws that you think are unjust? You know women can vote in Ukraine, right? Did you ever bother you use a brain cell before you pressed the 'save' button?
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 05:00 AM
1

It's not the same. You literally have one less person around. You have money ok, but money doesn't substitute a person's presence, someone that's there, that can help with chores, with the children, with the house. Someone to hug and support you in a difficult time. And to add to that, the e uncertainty of not knowing how long that will last? If the wife doesn't have family or a good support system she will have to deal with the household all by herself. You could say the exact same thing about …
/r/ExRedPill25/12/25 04:59 AM
1

Imagine swapping the genders here. "There is a massive problem that women are dealing with, and well, uh, it shouldn't fall on men to solve that problem" Zero empathy, saying people should ignore well being and problems of people simply because of their gender. Unreal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 02:46 AM
12

One thing you should do is ask boys and men in Ukraine who tried to flee the country like the women did and ended up being stuffed back into vans and sent to camps then die in the front lines because of their gender. Go ask their corpses. Snarkiness aside, I'm glad to see women and feminists in our spaces. I appreciate you being here. Myself and many others is just spreading awareness, calling out misandry, sexism against men, heightism, and prejudice against men who are short or bald or have sm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 02:43 AM
2

That doesn't answer his question...answer it. I dare you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:39 PM
1

Sweetheart, the exact same law exists in the US, Germany, and about every other first world country. Don't play dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:33 PM
1

Because males are more expendable, According to your logic, trans women, lesbian, an infertile women are 'expendable'. You are a disgusting transphobic homophobic incel. Male fertility is an almost unlimited resource (a human male could make more than 1 child per day), while female fertility is extremely limited (1 child per 9 months with us, & similar discrepancies exist in other mammals). What scenario exists in your little incel fantasy that would entail 9 women banging one man to procreate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/25 12:50 AM
1

Oh my god. So according to your logic, when white cops shoot black men it's somehow not oppression, or it's the fault of black men? How about when white men enslaved black men? And it's actually not 'men' who make these laws-it's white people. WHITE people. Our government is over 90% white. So I guess white women wouldn't be oppressed by the military draft, because they are part of the system that's perpetuating it, right? Because of white supremacy, right? So incredibly low IQ.
/r/ExRedPill02/05/25 03:07 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:40 PM
1

So do women. Do you live in the 1830s where women aren't in government positions?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:38 PM
1

You haven’t shown that men are conscripted to oppress them as men, Are you trolling, or are you missing a chunk of your cortex? The military draft drafts MEN and ONLY MEN. If conscription existed to oppress men based specifically on their sex, it wouldn’t be limited by age and fitness, it would target all men equally. According to your logic, if we enact a new draft law that says during war, women but only women aged 18-40 will undergo mandatory impregnation to repopulate, then it's doesn't exis…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:37 PM
1

The reason most governments only conscript people with testicles is not arbitrary oppression but the belief that they generally have greater physical strength, making them the most effective fighters Wrong. They do it because they believe men are mentally superior to women and that women can't aim guns. They also do it because they expect 1 man to fuck 10 women after war to repopulate. If the goal were to oppress people with testicles specifically, we would expect a much broader conscription pol…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:33 PM
0

Conscription predates women voting. No it doesn't, conscription exists in 2025 in almost all countries including the US. Men are the biggest gatekeepers to women in war. Women are just as complicit. Read about the white feather campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:32 PM
1

How is it matriarchal oppression if the people who created that system are men? Wouldn’t that be patriarchal oppression? Because there are lots of women in the Ukrainian government who did nothing to stop the military draft of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:30 PM
1

And? Nothing has changed. It's 2025 and women in government positions have done nothing to change the draft law. Nor have women voted to end men's military draft now that they have the right to vote. Herp derp.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:29 PM
1

Yes. You proved his point-there are women involved in the oppression of Ukrainian men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:28 PM
1

military conscription is a rule made by primarily male rulers Oh sweetheart, there are plenty of women in government roles. Also, you haven't read about the white feather campaign. This is a clear example of how patriarchy harms men lol So patriarchy is forcing men and only men to go die in wars-surely you're against this and advocate for gender equality in the military draft, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:27 PM
1

Why are you in this subreddit? To troll? The problem here is exclusively sexist-only Ukrainian men are oppressed by their country in being forced to stay, fight and die. Ukrainian women are given the legal right to leave the country-you can see them in clubs in Germany and Poland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 07:14 PM
1

Men are treated as disposable slaves. People are literally cheering for a man who enslaves men and forced them to stay in the country, be drafted and die. The rest of the world doesn't even care about Ukrainian men-if they did, they'd say "It's ok let them come live peacefully in other countries like their women are" Instead, they demand Ukrainian men die "for the greater good". I'm sorry dude. Nobody empathises. I pray you can find a way to escape the draft or the country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 07:06 PM
1

Oh yeah, I was agreeing, guarantee lillith won't respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 12:05 AM
–

Men are generally strong enough to defend themselves if it is a life or death situation. This comment displays your incredible male ignorance. Physical abuse is not always about life or death. It creates trauma, mental anguish, fear, anxiety, and grief. What an ass backwards way of looking at things. Being slapped in the face by a woman isn't expected to escalate to strangulation. It doesn't need to be in order to be abuse. There are numerous cases of women killing their male partners. What a se…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 10:10 PM
1

That's fucking crazy. I can't imagine being enough of a POS to do that to a woman. Also for a woman to like a guy like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:52 PM
1

Now say the same thing for men. This is just "not all men" repackaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:50 PM
1

You didn't answer op's question
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:50 PM
2

Oof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:49 PM
1

Even OP says "I don't think that she meant anything by it." There are untold millions of cases, on reddit, in real life, in documentaries, when the victims don't think their abusers were bad. Just because a child doesn't think their adult groomer had bad intentions doesn't mean they arent' being groomed or abused (because children don't have fully developed brains) Relevant, one example of untold millions: https://old.reddit.com/r/adultsurvivors/comments/1epvft1/what_were_you_groomed_with_and_wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:51 PM
1

handing someone a book you like Handing a sexually explicit book to an underage child. Know how I know, that YOU KNOW it's wrong? Never in a million years would you give one such book to a child when their father is around. You'd do it when the child is alone (like OP was), but never ever when their parents are around. Because you know if you did that you'd wake up in a hospital. You'd only do it when the child is alone, like all abusers do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:47 PM
-1

I understand and symapthize with your situation, and I know I'm heated because I don't tolerate grooming or excusing of it. But you should have known better, because from the get go, OP says it was a Romance Novel. That alone was inappropriate. And I stand by that your comment here is still disgustingly ignorant. Regardless I hope you heal from whatever trauma happened to you, genuinely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:39 PM
3

Yes, that's also terrible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:18 PM
-2

Girls are now being taught that awkward romantic advances from men are predatory IT sure as shit is when the guy is and adult and the girl is a child 30 yo men dating 20 yr olds is being labelled as "pedophilia". Which is incorrect, but completely irrelevant to OP's post. And now romance novels are "Sexual Abuse"? lol Nobody said this, unless your brain thinks exclusively in strawman arguments. An adult giving explicit sexual books to a CHILD, that is what is being discussed here. And it absolut…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:16 PM
2

"A book?" Is that what your brain took out of this scenario? It's explicitly sexualized content. It's porn in text-it's actually porn. Erotic stories are explicitly a form of pornography. Quote from OP:" "Yes, it was an adult sexual romance book with explicit sex scenes written by and for adult women." Fucking ghoul. Hope you never, EVER get near a child when their parents aren't nearby.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:12 PM
2

Quote from OP:"Yes, it was an adult sexual romance book with explicit sex scenes written by and for adult women." You can stop defending the groomer now. Jesus christ.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:09 PM
2

It's impossible to guess what she may or may not have been thinking, No, it's not. She was grown adult giving sexual content to a minor. The fuck do you mean "impossible to guess"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:07 PM
0

OP I'm extremely shocked at the responses you've received here. Especially in a subreddit like this. Victim blaming, excusing a creepy adult grooming a child by handing out sexually charged material. I'd ban every single one of them then throw them in prison if I could. Not many things worse in life than somebody who excuses child grooming and downplays it. Don't ever believe it was your fault or that it wasn't inappropriate. I'm sorry you had to go through that. I was groomed, racially and sexu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 11:00 PM
1

Remembering some of the books in my high school library, I think such material would be fairly normal reading for a teenager. In your library, curated by teachers, and used in the context of education. Not pushed by some random old pervert without the parents or teachers knowing. But calling it "sexual abuse" is going way too far. Only if you have zero clue as to how sexual abuse works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:57 PM
1

So you think it's okay to give explicit, sexually charge stories, texts to children. Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:56 PM
1

Single digit IQ post
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:55 PM
1

"I had breakfast so starvation must be a myth"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:55 PM
3

You do realize how many romance novels are out there? Yup, tons out there with explicit filthy shit. Why don't you answer us genius, why does a literal UNDERAGE CHILD need to read that shit? Especially when it's not in the context of school but some random creepy old person? But who is to say this old lady even REMEMBERED the content of the books to that extent? The fact that she gave him all these romance novels duh? Who the fuck are you to say she had alzheimers? Would you say the same thing i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:53 PM
1

Your ignorance is astounding. What a thing to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:46 PM
-2

Do you hear yourself? "An adult giving a little child sexually charged content isn't grooming as long as they had good intentions!" What the fuck? The ACT ITSELF of giving these books to an underage child is intention to groom. And no, she didn't "Need to be making inappropriate comments as she handed them" for it to be sexual abuse. I should crosspost your comment to r/groomingvictim so they can roast the fuck out of you, but I won't out of respect for OP. Please stay the fuck out of this subre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:45 PM
1

You are a so fucking gross to dismiss his genuine experience of being sexually abused as a "Troll". According to your logic, it's okay for grown men to give sexually charged material and erotic stories to little 12 year old girls who are volunteering to stop by his house and help with things like changing light bulbs. Do you know how GROOMING works? It's not about shoving somebody's face into pornhub. It's about introducing them to sexually charged material when their brains are still developing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:40 PM
-4

Are you fucking serious? In what world is it appropriate for an adult to give a child sexualized material? It's literally grooming. Take OP's post and reverse the sexes and you'd be losing your mind. OP ignore victim blaming assholes like this guy. What that person did was wrong. Hope youy feel better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/25 10:35 PM
3

Because men largely operate it and men are much more likely to perpetuate. That's a terrible excuse. What about the millions of men who aren't operating patriarchy and are being oppressed by it? Why lump them in? Men largely operated slavery in the US and were much more likely to perpetuate it. Does that mean you can blame black men for slavery in the US? Look how hard the manosphere fights against any suggestion that society could be improved that doesn't involve bashing women/feminists in some…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:39 AM
2

Then why do people blame men for patriarchy if they're being oppressed by patriarchy? It's almost as if 'patriarchy's is something perpetrated by a tiny group of (mostly white) men and most men have absolutely nothing to do with the oppression it causes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:46 AM
1

This is like blaming misogyny on women. You do not absolve yourself because of your gender. Some people have taken stops to stop shaming/insulting people for being born short or bald. Have you? And if so, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:46 PM
2

If men want to tell each other they are beautiful and build each other up that might actually only help them, but instead y'all seem to just shit on each other nonstop then end up wondering why you feel shitty and alone. This chud thinks every week, every single person gendered 'male' has a zoom meeting and decides how things will run. As if I have anything to do with white supremacists bc I'm black. As if I have anything to do with homophobe straight men because I'm gay. Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:44 PM
6

Because the same structures that oppress women oppress men. So that means men are oppressed, right? That means men are oppressed just like women are, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:41 PM
2

Get gender equality in the military draft, for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 PM
3

Who are the most likely perpetrators of violent crime? Overwhelmingly men. Hi, gay man here. Please don't lump us together with random violent psychopaths just because we both have balls. I assure you sweetheart, I have no more to do with Ted Bundy because we share gender than you do with him because you're both white.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 02:08 AM
1

Wow, what a thing to say. Does that include Black men? Gay men? Trans men? I'm wary of strangers already, but I'd probably be much more cautious if I were a foot shorter and 70 pounds lighter. You'd be a hell of a lot more likely to die or be beaten to death if you were 50 pounds heavier and had a mustache. Plenty of men are extremely cautious though, sweetheart, believe me. Not all of us are 6'3 200lbs. Short, light, and disabled/weak men exist, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 02:06 AM
6

Your post is pure conjecture and nonsense. You cannot seriously believe men are more likely to be victims of violent assault by a massive discrepancy because women are more careful, right? Where I live, young guys are robbing middle aged women in broad daylight. I had breakfast today, so starvation must be a myth, right? Clearly, they’re just an easier target than trying to rob a guy who is 6ft. When men do get robbed in broad daylight, it’s at gunpoint. And yet science directly contradicts your…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/24 02:03 AM
5

I always tell them "so you think police brutality involving white cops on black men is not a problem because they're both men" usually shuts their dumb closet-racist asses up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 12:43 AM
3

Mandatory vaccination is bad? Yes, forcing medical procedures with proven deleterious side effects created by greedy megacorporations with a proven history of putting money above human life is absolutely a bad thing. Taking proper preventive measures against diseases is bad? No. Does your brain think exclusively in strawman arguments? Vaccines=good Mandatory vaccination=bad. My body my choice, with zero exceptions. You're just making us look like morons. Only you, my friend.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 03:20 AM
-1

Well, feminism by definition promotes equality. But most women are not feminists (and neither are most men). I suppose you could also argue, in agreeance that you, that for all intents and purposes, modern "feminism" does indeed promote elitism, as well as sexism and discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 02:02 AM
2

Same kind of weasel who supports male-only military draft, mandatory vaccination, so on and so forth.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter