TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ovedya2011 Archive

View 3 posts and 169 comments by Ovedya2011 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
170

Social IssuesOvedya2011/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:31 PM
67

FeminismOvedya2011/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:06 PM
10

FeminismOvedya2011/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:46 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

It's a way to control men, to control the narrative about men. There is no such thing as, "toxic masculinity," it's just plain masculinity. Therefore, people pushing this bullshit are attacking men in general, and the idea that it's perfectly normal for males to act like males.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 07:04 PM
1

I'll need beer, pizza, and sports.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 06:31 PM
4

It depends on the state.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:43 PM
-1

This is a good thing.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 04:53 AM
15

And, well, that's bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:06 AM
11

You mean like encouraging boys to be boys, girls to be girls; enforcing essential peer-bonding, comraderie, and life skills? Nothing at all wrong will separating the sexes based on those things. If the girls want to be in Boy Scouts because they have similar interests, then let the Girl Scouts change their own skills set and education.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:52 AM
1

Your entire premise is, "It is far easier to kill a woman than to kill a man.", which is not evidenced. Why is it easier to kill a woman than a man? If I have a gun the odds are completely equal. If I poison a woman's drink and a man's drink, the odds are the same as to the liklihood of death. If I aim a truck at a crowd composed equally of women and men who are equally distributed, the odds are close to the same that I would hit and kill a man or a woman. Or maybe I'm missing what you're trying…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:06 PM
5

I tweeted her a screenshot of this thread and she blocked me.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:17 PM
1

I'm fully convinced this woman is a complete nutjob. Either that or she gets off on triggering people. Her tweets are almost consistently of this nature.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:07 PM
3

I, uh, don't have a whistle.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:57 AM
3

Can you please source that study? I'd like to read it. Also, "civil contempt" could be just flat out not paying.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:50 PM
5

There is that threat, sure. But to equate being a normal human being, with a job, to "being forced to work under penalty of imprisonment" simply because of a particular circumstance, is absurd.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:28 AM
6

A man is forced to work, under penalty of imprisonment... He is?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:01 AM
3

Call the police?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:28 PM
1

I do love me some cargos. Shorts, though, not pants.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:26 PM
6

I am. I am you.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:13 PM
1141

As much as I don't give two shits about what other men think about what I wear, the standard jeans & t-shirt is pretty much all I wear.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:12 PM
15

They're not wrong. Professional football players in the NFL make way more than their female counterparts. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:06 PM
76

Strange for a country that uses the word, "cunt" a lot.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:24 AM
5

Pieces of shit like these two are why I believe that equal justice should be metted out.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:16 PM
1

I could be wrong, but I don't think there were any women on the front lines.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:40 AM
47

Whatever all that means, fuck them. Bascially all they're saying is, "If you're a white dude publishing a research paper, don't put your name on it, because you being a white dude isn't fair to all the non-white dudes." It's fucking bullshit. I don't believe the scientific community gives a flying fuck if you're a white male publishing a paper. They care more about the accuracy and validity of your research.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:33 PM
28

So basically this brilliant guy, of unimpeachable character, didn't get his research funding, because he refuses to use absurd (completely made up) gender-neutral terms. Man, fuck those assholes.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:48 AM
17

In other words: Confess to the "truth" of our self-contrived narrative, or fuck the fuck off. My, how open-minded and accepting.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:20 AM
5

Sure. This is why I have to walk through the perfume section, the lingerie, down the escalator, past the baby clothes, to a badly lit dank corner of every department store, so I can by a pair of jeans not in my size.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:16 PM
26

So she says while being interviewed by a man.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:50 PM
0

What the hell does that have to do with Trump?
/r/MensRights18/02/17 03:16 AM
19

"Inappropriately" put in prison? WTF does that mean? If you have kids, maybe you shouldn't be commiting crimes. How about that?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:33 PM
-10

Why?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:25 AM
1

Honestly I don't know with what regularity it happens in Muslim nations. But we pretty regularly hear in news outlets, and through humanitarian agencies, that women are being beaten for what we in Western culture would consider absurd, and even having had sentences for things such as talking to an unfamiliar man. The point being, women in Islamic nations are horribly oppressed - from not having the right to education, to not having the right to drive. They cannot enter public without being "prop…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:24 PM
4

"Executed on the spot" is a bit much, but definately beaten for speaking without the permission of their husbands or male escorts.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:35 PM
1

Literally a violation of OSHA safety regulations to remove signage at a construction site. That little college can straight up go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:53 PM
14

Who would be drunk enough to impregnate her in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:21 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 03:29 PM
0

I didn't see any article about what you referenced, however: This is an opinion blog, not a set of research articles, intended for the public not scientists.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 05:00 PM
1

It was your argument that every child deserves to be intact. Logically you still couldn't argue that abortion is every bit as much a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:00 PM
1

Good, because I was done with this yesterday.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:56 PM
1

Right. Because the religious observance of taking a small piece of flesh off an infant as a sign of fielty to God, is exactly the same as slavery. Are you going to bring the same old "mixed threads" into this too? That's an old gem.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:55 PM
2

I doubt tha my son will ever ask my why I had him circumcised. In any case if he does, I'll tell him. As far as botched surgical procedures are concerned, they happen across the entire spectrum. It's fucked up, but it's also just a fact of life. It is neither logical, or reasonable, to assume that every child that has ever been circumcised suffered mental trauma. It's not even something that can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As far as human rights, I'll go back to an argument I made yeste…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:52 PM
0

Why? Are you getting into the psychological trauma associated with the loss of tissue, and comparing that with adult men vs. adult women? Because that's entirely different.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:33 AM
2

In the billions of circumcisions performed in the last 2,000+ years, please tell me the percentage of infants that have died strictly from shock associated with the procedure, either clinically or otherwise. I doubt that there is even a statistic that quantifies this idea.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:30 AM
-4

No, actually, irrespective of the environment, the cutting off of a piece of foreskin is not remotely the same as the severing of a clitoris. The apropos comparison would be that of cutting off the head of the penis and the clitoris respectively. I don't give a shit about nerve endings in the comparison.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:24 AM
1

Infants don't possess coping mechanisms. Those are learned behaviors.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:17 AM
2

Many doctors justify it by saying the infant won't remember the excruciating pain, which modern science knows is patently false. Really? Can you describe the very first rug burn you experienced as a child learning to walk? How about the first time you bumped your head on a table edge? I doubt you (if you're circumcised), or anyone else remembers that "excruciating pain." When I was 9-years-old I fractured my leg while playing with my dad. Funny thing: I vaguely remember the event, but I still ca…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:15 AM
-8

So wait. For clarification we are talking about the difference between male and female circumcision. A process, which on the one hand is typically done with a dull knife or a sharpened stone to remove the female "penis", and on the other hand is largely done under mild anesthesia with precision instuments in a sterile environment by a professional trained in surgical procedure. The former is a barbaric practice performed entirely by the superstitious, and the latter is performed by a medical pra…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:08 AM
2

I don't have to, because the minor surgery was performed before I could make memories.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:55 AM
1

No, not at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:53 AM
-8

I see, so then your argument is that cutting off a clitoris is less important than cutting off foreskin?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:52 AM
3

Nah. Not really.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:43 AM
2

I had my ear pierced twice. It was just a sting.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:00 PM
3

Well, uh, because it's a surgical procedure done with clean tools and mild anesthesia? Also, we're not using the procedure to get critical information about subversive actions from foreign enemies.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:59 PM
-10

It's no different than cutting off a clit Unless there's a new form of curcumcision in which the practitioner cuts the head off a child's penis, yes, it is.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:36 PM
1

It's a basic component of human sexuality. Males experience sex in a different way than females. There is a greater sexual drive (generally speaking) in males than females, and sex has a greater psychological component in both. And before you take this response as my being an adherent of female genital mutilation, I am not. Female "circumcision" is the removal of the clitorus, as well as the labia minora, on-par with cutting the head of the penis off, which I am obviously not for. The two are no…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:23 PM
0

Not the same thing. But thanks.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:04 PM
0

Doesn't matter. Are they abnormal or not? I'm going to presume at this point that your husband is circumcised, since you've obviously avoided my query. Tell me, have you informed him that he's been mutilated and probably suffers from the same type of emotional and psychological trauma as a victim of violent attack or rape; that he may be suffering from PTSD? If not, you should.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:59 PM
0

Wow. I'm sorry for your pain. Still, though, your example doesn't make every one of these surgical procedures on par with sexual abuse and real mutilation.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:51 PM
0

What about those that aren't? Still haven't answered my questions.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:49 PM
0

Define "normal." In today's society many things that are obviously abnormal from birth are supposedly "normal," where do you draw the line?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:46 PM
1

If his sex drive will be anything like mine was/is, trust me, he won't miss anything. So....to my question earlier...
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:43 PM
0

Sorry, doesn't help. It is interesting (and soothing so as to make one sleepy, due to the monotone voice of the narrator), but the only thing I got was, "sex isn't as great, it turns a funny color, and the dick dries out. Nothing really about inhibiting the essential functions of the penis. Oh, and, is your husband circumcised?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:22 PM
1

Huh? Seriously, I'm not remorseful over having my boy circumcised at all, and neither is he. Nor do I doubt he will be. But, if in the future he is, I also doubt he'll resent me for it. He has a dick. He can have sex, and, as comedian Louis C.K. says, "100% of the time when a man has sex, it's the best thing that has every happened to him in his life." Pretty much true. Because sex isn't all about rubbing the body parts together. It is mainly mental.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:13 PM
-1

Still not getting your point. Sorry.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:07 PM
1

Exactly how does it change the function of the penis? The penis does basically two things, and functions essentially one way. The penis mainly expels waste from the body via the urinary tract, and delivers sperm for the purpose of procreation. In its basic function it is either flaccid or erect. The male erection is accomplished by the engorgement of blood to the specialized tissues involved, which enables coitus. There is absolutely no credible medical evidence suggesting that the expelling of …
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:06 PM
1

But...you argued that it is both mutilation, and renders the male penis dysfunctional. Which way do you want it?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:56 PM
2

Thank you for a reasoned, rational response. While I'm not convinced that the undeveloped child's brain has the capacity for the same level of emotional and psychological trauma suffered by victims of serious abuse or war, I understand the concern over what may be an uneccessary surgical procedure. To take it to the level of child abuse or as a human rights violation, however, is just too extreme, IMO. As a religious right, though, at least in countries where the state cannot intervene in religi…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:55 PM
-1

Huh?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:48 PM
1

I'm talking about choice. Since your main points are about choice and "intact" human beings, you surely can't be pro-choice and anti-circumcision, since the issue is about an infant's right to choose. If every infant deserves to be "intact," shouldn't they also have the essential right to be born in the first place? Also, I would say that "intact" also includes the right to be born with any defects that could surgically be corrected, such as having a dysfunctional heart valve, or "hole in the he…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:47 PM
0

Mutilation, by definition is to render some body part completely dysfunctional. Many millions of men, over thousands of years, have been able to have completely satisfying sex lives, and have many children, having been circumcised. I'd hardly classify the procedure as "mulitalition." BTW is your husband circumcised? Just curious.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:28 PM
1

They also sell aborted fetuses for medical research. Are you anti-abortion? For the sake of your argument I hope so. Also, IIRC some cosmetics contain ground up beetles, and perfume contains sperm whale bile fluid (found in their shit basically).
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:23 PM
-2

I know of no doctor that sucks the dick of an infant in order to circumcise him. You have a problem with a religious ritual, and that makes you a bigot in today's society.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:12 PM
1

Lol. Are you fucking serious? You went waaaay down the rabbit hole, didn't you?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:09 PM
-1

So then medical doctors, who perform the majority of circumcisions, suck the dicks of their patients. Is that what you want me to believe?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:05 PM
-3

Circumcision is rape. Really? Tell that to a rape victim. I'm sure she/he would appreciate it. Now I think you're just crazy.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:58 PM
0

Babies aren't Born with teeth, usually.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:56 PM
-10

Oh, so then this whole issue is about Anti-Semitism, is it?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:49 PM
2

I think minus a small piece of flesh, his whole body is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:47 PM
1

In your article you claim that it is "...one of the most egregious violations of human rights in history." So yeah' you put it right up there with other human rights violations. I think it's irresponsible. Furthermore' child abuse? Like on-par with child rape and such? Come now. As far as function is concerned, circumcised penises function every bit as well as uncircumcised penises.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:46 PM
0

Do you really think it's responsible to compare a minor surgical procedure to watching your family chopped to pieces and having your village burned to the ground?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:56 PM
1

I'm proud that I have a healthy happy son.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:38 PM
2

It was a little metal thing that went around the end of the penis to hold the skin in place. He used a scalpel to remove the flesh, and then tied a couple of stitches. The whole thing took about a minute, and then the boy was give right to mom and on the boob.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:38 PM
0

I also had the doctor cut his umbilical cord.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:34 PM
2

What perceived rights did I take away? Please educate me.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:33 PM
4

Oh, completely.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:20 PM
2

You were the one who shot with, "fuck you for taking the choice away from your son." You know, I also took the choices of dropping out of school and doing drugs away from my son. So fuck me, right? I'm a terrible parent.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:20 PM
3

Oh, so then you know that taking choices away from your kids is a thing parents do with some regularity.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:53 PM
6

Oh, okay. Well that makes sense then. Still, no, though.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:52 PM
0

You're not a parent, are you?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:50 PM
6

You make comments like this, and your username is, "Think more about it"?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:49 PM
8

Ah, no. Causes of dissociative shock are CO poisoning, cyanide poisoning and anemia.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:45 PM
5

I held my son while the doctor performed the procedure. It took about a minute and the boy stopped crying in about 2 minutes. I dunno about you, but to me "torture" lasts a lot longer. EDIT: Yeah, yeah, I know this will get nothing but downvotes, but let me just say that I'm neither for or against this issue. My comment was more about the absurdity of this article's author, of comparing the removal of a small piece of flesh with things like thumbscrews, waterboarding, child sex slavery, and othe…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:41 PM
-4

Torture. Really?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:37 PM
8

Here's a broad unhinged from reality and incapable of self-control. She's the "victim" of a complete stranger because of some signs that she "has to drive by" every day, and she gets so embroiled in her emotion that she flips off a guy she derogatorily refers to as a "redneck."
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:45 AM
-2

Can we also call them, "pussy pundits," or is that not PC?
/r/MensRights09/09/16 03:24 PM
3

I blame the liberals. Political correctesness is a facet of social engineering.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 07:35 PM
4

I think is a giant steaming heap of gender-neutral bovine excrement.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 07:01 PM
1

My full beard is a plague upon me.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:14 PM
2

This is probably less of a men's issue and more of a, "That crazy bitch at the McDonald's" issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 03:33 AM
3

Why do people think this is okay?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:43 PM
1

He's a professional asshole. He is Debbie Wasserman Schultz with a little penis and more attitude; a Democrat stooge.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:26 AM
-1

Alan Grayson is a fucking shitlord. Always has been.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:11 AM
38

Try r/publicfreakout with this one.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:48 AM
3

"Hi. You look very nice today." "HANDS AGAINST THE WALL, PERVERT!"
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:53 PM
2

How does that work? "Hi. Um, excuse me. Can I say 'Hi' to you? Well, I already said, 'Hi', but I'd just like to make sure it's okay that I say, 'Hi', even though I've already said it."
/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:32 PM
1

Just curious. What's your stance on abortion?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 10:30 PM
-7

Lol. Really? That's like saying one kid dying of pneumonia is too many. Or one kid dying of malaria is too many. People die all the time. It's a fact of life. One child dies of unsanitary conditions in an African clinic, and another dies beause he was born with a fucked up heart. The fact is, that millions of children are born every year that have undergone circumcision - both in and out of hospitals and clinics - and live without any complications or mental trauma. You can advocate against it a…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 05:01 AM
-9

Right. Because 10 deaths in Africa from circumcision is such an eye-opening tragedy. Hey. How about the tens-of-thousands of kids born every year with deformities, withdrawals, due to drug abuse and alcoholism? Don't worry about those.kids, because a few die in Africa from unsanitary conditions. We need to stop the scourge of circumcision!
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:47 AM
-12

Didn't "surf" here, actually. Just subscribed to the sub. Happy 4th!
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:16 AM
-23

Hey. Can we not bring down the holiday with depressing figures of baby deaths? On the whole, the vast majority of circumcisions are safe and perfectly fine. Relax.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:24 AM
18

The Bonobo chimp is an endangered species.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 06:33 PM
2

Well at least he still has bacon.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 04:24 AM
49

She's an attention whore that will stop at nothing to ruin a man's life to feed her vanity. If anything, she should be publicly shamed.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:00 PM
8

Jesus, there are a lot of stupid people in this world.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:29 PM
3

They already do. Hey, here's an idea: If you have kids, don't do shit that will land you in jail.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:55 PM
2

How about tying her tubes so she can't have anymore children? Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:37 PM
-11

Because there are fewer hairy fat women with B.O.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 01:54 PM
2

Congratulations on your bouncing baby CHUD.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 07:44 PM
-9

I’ve been dreaming of a male birth control option for years and there have been way too few options. What the fuck? Yes, this is what most men sit around all day doing, dreaming of a day when we have more options for birth control. What a shit article.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:35 AM
45

What I came here to say. First commenter straight up tells her she raped the guy, but then goes on to say that the kid should be supported. Fuck no. The guy should demand a DNA test, and if he's the father, sue for custody.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:28 PM
1

Most gals don't care, or think about this kind of thing as a paternalistic abuse. I wouldn't worry.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:07 AM
1

That was truly delightful!
/r/MensRights12/02/16 09:44 PM
4

Imagine opening a speech with "listen up!"
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:51 PM
6

I've tried it with "sweeties" but the sound of pitchforks being prepared is unnerving.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:50 PM
2

That's what a generalization is dummy, is something based on evidence. "the act or process of forming opinions that are based on a small amount of information" Jesus, you're dense. Try reading a few articles sometime. Like this one, or this one, for example. ... i.e., old men with wives who actually know how to behave like real humans, not spiteful, unaccountable pieces of shit and is not up to date and not accounting for the EXTREME changes in society, the laws and women themselves. Wow. You're…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:34 PM
5

411: The claim that married men live longer is a generalization. Uh, not it's not. It's actual evidence from numerous studies. Interestingly, despite what you claimed in your original bitter generalizations concerning marriage, the evidence points to marriage benefiting men's health through reduced stress, better nutrition, and by encouraging healthy behaviors. None of what you've written so far is based in fact or research. I'm sorry that you're interactions with women haven't been great, but i…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:53 PM
10

There are a lot of generalizations here about marriage and relationships, and the tone is really cynical. To begin with, yes there is stress in marriage. But there is stress in any relationship - whether short or long term. Whether a woman is a feminist or not, is not the determining factor of a happy, healthy relationship. All women have the instinctive desire for financial and emotional support. They also want partnership in a relationship, in a marriage. Likewise, men have the instinctive des…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:57 PM
2

These are not human beings. They are animals deserving of being put down, no less.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:11 PM
2

The ability to be prejudice without recourse. The ability to form groups based upon "blackness" or, "black power" without the accusation of racism. A yearly holiday based purely on ethnicity (Kwanzaa).
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:46 PM
10

Someone's got his balls in their purse.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:41 PM
0

You have two choices: Get the vasectomy & kick her to the curb. Don't get the vasectomy & rubber up. I don't know your age, but if you're a young guy, you might want children in the future. Given that she's your girlfriend, you will likely move on at some point in the future. Kids tie you down, man.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:17 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:29 AM
2

Penis In Vagina
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:28 PM
3

A PIV interaction is not a yes.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:14 PM
8

Folks can create a "petition" there for anything. I wouldn't worry. At least 30k people in any given place are as dumb as a box of rocks.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:26 PM
5

It doesn't matter. He's not even black.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:26 AM
1

Technicalities
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:54 PM
0

Here's the article: http://m.local10.com/news/woman-puts-ketchup-on-naked-body-at-miami-beach-johnny-rockets-police-say/36151432 I read from another article that she was on molly, wasted AF. At one point a guy sodomizes her with a chair leg. After stripping naked she laid back on a table and she, and another patron, poured katsup on her naked body. Nobody covered her up, and the men were all acting like animals, touching her and taking pictures. She finally only covered herself when a staff memb…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:19 PM
4

In response, some schools are creating volunteer squads of girls to police sexist attitudes and report back to teachers. Now there's a really great idea. /s
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:48 PM
1

Well maybe they'll bar her from using social media. It's a good start to getting this racist twat put in her place.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:01 PM
1

But the fleshlight is okay, I suppose.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:59 PM
2

As already stated, there was no rape. Unless you consider a triangle leg lock "rape".
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:51 PM
1

"Goodness gracious, great balls of fire!"
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:22 PM
5

How's that been working for you?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:14 PM
8

Well I think that we at least should feel guilty about participating in the patriarchal paradigm of cooking meat over fire.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:24 PM
7

Maybe you could try and leverage that with your boss. "Look, I bring in all kinds of people. If I have to leave, they'll find me at my new place of employment." But otherwise you might even do better somewhere else.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:48 PM
6

Are you a union worker? If you, find out if your union has any anti-discrimination policies on the books that your employer could be violating. Otherwise, I'd say that, because some industries work this way, you're fighting a "good old boy" kind of attitude here. Fact is, places like that make more money with a pretty girl behind the bar. It might be in your best interest to find another job. Hey, maybe at a gay bar.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:35 PM
4

Well then you're going to lose your cock, because by definition a 15-year-old cannot consent.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:14 AM
21

Are....are serious?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:35 PM
92

So "child sex" verses "raping teen boy." Rape is more of a charged word than sex. He's evil, while she's not as evil. But, you know, women can't rape anyone, they can only have sex.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:03 PM
3

Green sign: My choices do not determine my consent. Fu-what?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:57 PM
4

Anyone else find it a bit ironic that a shit liberal Obama-loving site is named "Vox," when there's a shit conservative Obama-hating organization called "Fox"? Or maybe that's not irony. Screw it, you humans, I'm convinced.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:29 PM
-5

I had trouble concentrating.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 02:54 PM
0

That....that can't be real. Tell me that's not a real thing.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:33 PM
3

Shit. I already have white guilt. Now I have to have white male guilt as well? Fuck it, I'm putting on a dress and talking with a lisp from here on out.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:55 PM
4

So she was conned out of 5k, and she's pissed that he also conned her into bed? Priorities.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:13 PM
8

Okay, I'm going to be the asshole here. Why is a woman who would probably never be deceived into having sex in the first place, pushing for a bill like this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:05 PM
47

She was originally charged with rape, but it was reduced to attempted rape and assault, both felonies. Is this what Whoopi meant when she said, "It wasn't rape rape."?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:51 PM
-1

And probably not entirely accurate.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:21 PM
6

Nah. Remember, "We live in a culture in which rape and sexual violence is expected and accepted as a norm." Go ahead, rape away, they expect you to.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:12 PM
1

Somebody please make this national news immediately.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:04 PM
0

Druthers means "personal preference." I think that men are better suited for military service, and especially on the front lines in a conflict.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:14 PM
-4

It's fear mongering at best. If I had my druthers there would be compulsory military service for every male upon the age of 18 and optional for every female at 18.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:07 PM
-2

There is no draft presently.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:20 PM
67

This is fucking jaw-dropping.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:02 PM
7

Because fucking.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:29 AM
51

Yes. Female deviants are apparently a lot more "rehabitable" than males.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:49 PM
-9

You mean the tissue that contains thousands of nerve endings, and serves to protect part of the penis? There is no evidence that the foreskin contains "thousands" of nerve endings. Some studies have found what is called Meissner's corpuscles, which appear to diminish with age, but the research is inclonclusive. What is also inclnclusive of the overall benefit of the foreskin in uncircumsized vs. circumsized men. In short, it's a net-sum draw: Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of signifi…
/r/MensRights18/11/11 08:33 PM
-14

Non sequitur. Female circumcision involves the removal of the clitorus. Not nearly the same thing as severing extra tissue from the body. Female circumcision never has been, nor will ever be endorsed by the AMA or any other group of physicians. On the other hand labial surgery is hugely popular among women. Are you equally opposed to this procedure?
/r/MensRights18/11/11 01:29 PM
-16

Hence the turtle in a turtleneck comment. Seriously though, why is this even an issue of contention? Irrespective of your beliefs on the issue of circumcision it is the parents' decision.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:52 AM
-23

Okay. But on the other hand an uncircumcized penis looks like a turtle wearing a turtleneck sweater, and that's just too much freaking turtle if you ask me. One flaw in the article, though: Did the AMA stop to think about WHO IS THE PATIENT who supposedly is making an “informed choice?” Answer: the BABY is the patient – not the parents – and the baby cannot consent. Ah, that's just completely ridiculous considering the fact that infants can't consent to anything. Would the author expect a baby, …
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter