TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OwOFemboyUwU Archive

View 8 posts and 512 comments by OwOFemboyUwU on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The reason I think systemizing should be more valued than empathizing in this context is that by definition would be better for understanding overarching rules in complex systems. Yk, like analyzing the dating market. I’m sure the empathizing would be more valuable for actually carrying out social interactions, like actually going out on a date. Also those women may have a lot of affective empathy, but I find it very unlikely they would have high cognitive empathy (which is what the article refe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 06:14 PM
0

So then women also see men as things of value… it’s almost as if everything literally just is a thing of value, that value being the happiness you gain from it…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 06:05 PM
1

The redpill doesn’t talk about what is “supposed to be”. The entire point of it is accepting realitt for what it currently is and from that only maximizing your own gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:18 PM
1

It isn’t the internet. I’ve seen it firsthand, in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:14 PM
1

It seems to have changed extremely rapidly for women in their benefit, but not to the benefit of any man at all. Why should any man respect the new changes if they themselves do not reap its benefit due to female hypocrisy and solipsism?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:13 PM
1

“Romance” is a scam for men, and it seems you fell for it. The redpill is simply trying to show you that. Romance consists of elaborate courtship rituals to woo the other, and women do pretty much no courtship - the entire burden of it falls on men. It’s more accurate to say men do the romancing while women get romanced - why would a man want this deal if he can get the same benefit without the cost of “doing the romancing”?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:08 PM
1

Where are all the women making fun of teenage boys This is insanely common, to make fun of teenage boy interests or personalities. Look at how any cringe-centered sub treats shonen, or make fun of “edgelords/debate bros”. Teenagers both boys and girls are cringy, and consequently teenagers both boys and girls are made fun of.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:05 PM
1

What exactly do you mean by empathy and emotional awareness here? Cuz a lot of time what women mean by those aren’t exactly things men even want to strive towards. It isn’t societal considerations preventing them from expressing that they want it - they just don’t want it in the first place (depending on how you define it).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 09:01 PM
1

Women are far more fickle and flaky on average, though. That is largely just because they can afford to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:51 PM
0

Women can’t smell shit lol, why do all of their “personality detectors” break with hot abusive chad? Women aren’t mind readers, nobody is, stop with the delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:49 PM
5

Again been there done that, found no success But that is a product of your standards - there certainly exist tons of men on apps who will die for any women. You rule them out. I do not find it believable you do not get matches at all, considering the pig woman experiment. Did you know the FAW women had to temporarily go private because they got so many offers from lonely men? There's a good reason nobody takes self labeled "involuntarily lonely" women seriously, and that's because it is quite im…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 03:36 AM
5

It’s not a fantasy, you literally do have it significantly easier - once again within the span of 10 minutes you can download OLD, get a match, and be on track to a date. Lonely men cannot do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 03:22 AM
5

In 10 minutes, you could download any online dating app of your choice and find a match. Your situation is not the same - quantity is basically never an issue for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 03:11 AM
1

What a woman rates a 4 is most likely a 7 kek
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:45 PM
2

Nah, even then the personality detectors start to break if the man is high enough SMV
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:41 PM
1

Men very much admit to needing women and women don’t really need men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:40 PM
0

I don’t think it’s underrated. Everybody recognizes it’s bad - schizophrenia followed by autism are by themselves each the two worst traits one can have as a man for the dating market. It’s not discussed because that’s not the reason most struggling men are struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:34 PM
2

Men don’t care about your depression or emotional state though, atleast not as much as how hot you are, and 30s women tend to be significantly less hot on average
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:24 AM
2

The description is not inherently moralistic, that is why it is a description. Some men may attach moralistic terms to it, but that does not mean that that stating that descriptive statement necessarily entails that moralistic belief. Once again, the claim women are lesser for it is not entailed by the claim of it itself!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:45 AM
1

What would be a straightforward approach for casual sex that wouldn’t get one labeled a ‘creep’?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 11:28 PM
2

Yes, I agree that that is how many men here describe female attraction. The implication was that them describing female attraction this way —> they think females are less than human. That implication isn’t correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 07:45 PM
1

Once again, the implication being drawn by the person I responded is that stating “women are incapable of unconditional love” means they see women as less than human. Ofc lots of guys here state that women are incapable of unconditional love
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 07:34 PM
1

Women do not want men to tell their intentions directly. If a man who wants casual sex goes up to a woman and says “nice booba down to fuck?” - women find that disgusting apparently even if they are into casual sex and are into that guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 04:19 AM
1

True, and sadly the realities of female attraction means with monogamous pairings, attraction won’t be mutual most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 07:54 PM
3

That’s the key of the social code woman make when it comes to these sort of these things - it’s supposed to be impossible to follow if you ever want to date. It’s their way of keeping unattractive guys out of the dating market, but they will break these rules for attractive guys. Make rules for incels, break rules for chads
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 07:17 PM
2

Ok - you’re coming at it from a perspective that I doubt most people are coming at it from. Love is emotional and ill-defined Emotional =/= ill-defined. It's impossible to have a fruitful discussion about anything ill-defined - because any claim about that thing would have no meaning as there is no definition to actually give meaning lol. It is typically believed that non-human animals don’t love each other in the same way human animals tend to (or the way we idealise we do). Once again what pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 01:58 AM
1

I should have been more clear in my first comment, I meant that men here state women are incapable of unconditional love. My bad, I will edit that in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:42 AM
2

I guess it’s my observed belief that a key part of being human is the ability to love someone for who they are and with a degree of altruism not really seen in other animals. A human is simply a class of animals with the ability to not produce viable offspring with animals outside of themselves. This does not entail that humans have a higher degree of altruism, and the statement "love someone for who they are" is completely ill-defined and vague. Furthermore, this is your belief that all humans …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:29 AM
-1

A) men are not claiming women are incapable of it, they are claiming they are capable of it only a conditional basis B) saying women are incapable of unconditional love does not entail love is the pinnacle of emotion C) Even if all this were the case, why would it be dehumanizing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 11:51 PM
0

How do you define “women don’t genuinely love men” then? The way most men here mean is that female love is always conditional on an attribute you do not consider to be part of your identity. Or the common way it’s phrased around here: “women love men as human doings, men love women as human beings” and “men love women unconditionally”? Tell me how a man who believes that doesn’t look at the way he loves as superior. You are the only one attaching normative claims of superiority and inferiority h…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:50 PM
-1

Right, i'm not denying that men here state women are incapable of love unconditional love, they claim that all the time ofc. What i'm denying is drawing from that the implication that these men believe women aren't truly human and are inferior. EDIT: Meant to say unconditional love
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:44 PM
1

Because women have to take everything as some sort of normative claim even when it isn’t. So in their mind, saying group X generally has trait Y automatically entails “group X is good/bad”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:17 PM
-1

The worst one for me is the belief that women are not capable of truly loving men. To me that’s a statement they don’t believe women are truly human and are inferior to men Women and drawing ridiculous implications that really aren’t what is being said, name a better combo. Your statement is like if I said I liked turtles to someone and they responded to me by saying “how DARE you hate jellyfish!”. It’s just unrelated
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:47 PM
11

The most blackpilled people next to incels are the chads lol, lots of men who casually sleep around very often, despise women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:44 PM
3

Most marriages aren’t horrible, but are near loveless. Romantic love is always gonna be temporary.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:42 PM
1

What is rude about “your hot I wanna fuck” tho?? Like if I wanted a coworker to help me move a desk I would analogously say “you are strong help me move this desk”. Also there really isn’t such thing as polite directness most of the time, most of the time when people avoid being rude they do so by not being direct.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:39 PM
2

Signs are never obvious. The only thing that is obvious are direct words.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 07:05 PM
3

Typical woman moment double standards, I don’t want to face X so I’ll hold others responsible for facing it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 07:02 PM
2

It does also cause less suitors though - the only difference between a suitor and a creeper is whether you find them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 06:25 PM
0

Question: have you ever hooked up with a man immediately before?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 06:04 PM
1

The former is directness and for some reason despite women saying they want men to be more upfront they are against that? That doesn’t make very much sense
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 05:52 PM
1

Idk man my parents would probably be pretty happy if some dude took me to a brothel to finally get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:44 AM
1

Social skills don’t matter for shit in dating so I find it weird you keep emphasizing them
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:44 AM
1

Jewish Propaganda
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:42 AM
1

This part kinda boggles my mind, in a genuinely curious way - how is experimentation necessary to know if you are attracted or not to an entire gender? Do so few people catch your attraction that you never notice you are physically attracted to a person of that gender when you are just out and about?? Considering most people somewhat semi regularly go into high density environments, that would imply easily less than 0.1% of people are catching your eye if experimentation was necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:36 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:34 AM
1

So then it’s still an issue of your standards… that is a privilege for you to have a wider variety of options at the same harshness of standards and same effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:32 AM
1

Women haven’t mastered the art of being sexy by creating anticipation, men just don’t care about anticipation or any of that. After all, why would men give a shit, wtf would anticipation do for us sexually lol? Men would either prefer a woman who just “whips it out with no personality attached” as opposed to building anticipation or just be ambivalent (I would be in the former category - prefer). Anticipation isn’t for men - why would men even want that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:31 AM
1

A recipe for disaster
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:25 AM
1

The fundamental difference is that men need women as an end in itself, while women only need men as a means to another end. The reason it is the way that a social institution like the government can make men obsolete is because they provide another means for providing that end. To see this difference, if the government has made men obsolete, why haven’t flashlights/sex dolls/widespread free porn of any variety made women obsolete? Men do not value. Men do not need women for the reason of somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 08:20 AM
0

Why would she settle for casual sex with someone who’s good enough to be in a relationship with (if she wants a relationship in the first place)? Why would she waste a perfectly good man for that purpose? That doesn't change the fact that it's still showing he's lower value. If I paid less to get into a party/club than someone else, it's because my very being there is more valued to the organizer. More specifically, sex is proportional to value provided, which is equal to hotness + commitment. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 02:16 AM
-1

Yet most women don’t care about the other issue - once again, if you don’t take your own moral code seriously, why should anybody else?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:14 AM
1

You can quantify sociological statistical outcomes, you cannot quantify exactly to what extent these outcomes are the result of socialization. Any method that can quantify the fraction variance in an outcome that is attributed to socialization, can quantify to the same precision the fraction variance in an outcome that is attributed to biology and vice versa - as by definition these two numbers would sum to 1. It’s therefore contradictory to claim that the size of the effect that is attributable…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 10:15 PM
2

No, women do not want this from men they aren’t physically attracted to. To any given woman, men they aren’t physically attracted to is 90-95% of men. Therefore, for most men it wouldn’t help - the step most men get stuck on is simply being physically attractive to any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 08:49 PM
1

How is that out of touch? It is a privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 08:48 PM
0

You can’t quantify the extent to which it is the result of socialization either for that exact reason, yet you seem more than happy to confidently assert that it is because of socialization.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 08:48 PM
0

How is this any different than working any type of job and getting any type of service? Most service workers wouldn’t perform a service without pay, because it is work and most people don’t like work in a vacuum. They put up with it for the money. How is prostitution any different from literally any paid service? Unless you want to tell me the massage parlor also violates the consent of those massaging lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:03 PM
1

It isn’t a disregard of consent however, it’s a disregard of attraction. One can still consent to an action in a transactional way I.e consent conditional on an exchanges commodity from the other party, how does that negate consent? Let’s use an analogy, say you go to get your hair cut at a barber shop. The barber likely would not have cut your hair if you said up front you would refuse to pay - so according to your logic, paying for a hair cut would violate the barber’s consent! Therefore, is g…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:01 PM
0

It is correct to call out female hypocrisy. Most women don’t have issue creating demand for a commodity that is the product of exploited labor, yet they hold contempt to johns for that exact reason. The fact that one is not consistent with their own moral code shows that they don’t take their own moral code seriously, and if they don’t take their moral code seriously why should anyone else?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 06:58 PM
0

Why is it the male biological responsibility to support the child? Their money, their choice :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 06:50 PM
1

Most men don’t have an issue with this in the sense that they think women shouldn’t be allowed to do this, most men have an issue with this in the sense that they don’t want to date a woman who does this. The reason is simple: she does casual sex, but not with you, therefore you do not invoke what is necessary to lead to casual sex I.e. lust. Most men don’t want to be with a woman who isn’t attracted to them, because that means she’ll be a surefire drain on his resources. If you’re still having …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 06:34 PM
1

If you define preferences as what gives you the tingles, a lot of times women say it is their preferences that have changed when in reality it is only their behavior that has changed rather than their preferences. For example, take the behavior switch from going for AFs to going for BBs, which happens often as women grow older. It is still the case that the socially awkward programmer doesn’t give them the tingles and she would have ignored him in her youth, there is no lust from the woman’s sid…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 06:27 PM
1

“If you don’t treat women better than you treat men you weren’t raised right!1!!11!!” Why should women be treated better?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 06:10 PM
1

Men are more impulsive in all aspects, including in emotionally impulsive behavior, but women are far more likely to let emotions dictate their worldview over accuracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:44 PM
14

It happens from a big chunk of women I would say, just not towards the vast majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 07:12 PM
0

The averages don't have to be equal mathematically when it comes to the straight population. The reality is that there are way more men who find women attractive than their women who find men attractive especially going into 2023. This is true but once again mathematically the averages have to be roughly equal - males just have higher variance in that it is chad having most of the sex. The total amount of straight sex with new partners increases each partners n count by 1, so total male n count …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:18 AM
0

Extremely few men think this, this is a hamster by women to rationalize placing expectations on others that they themselves wouldn't fulfill. They don't want to overcome their anxiety to ask someone out yet expect men to do so, and rationalize it with hamsters like this which are just nonsensical because why would guys prize putting in more effort?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:07 AM
0

Harry styles still has a masculine facial structure, he's still a "chad" in that way. Men are not chasing the masculine social ideal, they are chasing the masculine biological ideal because that is indeed what women want, and Harry Styles and Kpop stars would still fall into that latter of masculine biological ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:05 AM
3

This isn't possible really, men will always have a slightly higher number of average partners. If you only take into account the straight population, the averages have to be equal mathematically, and gay men tend to have more sex than lesbian women, which skews the male average to be slightly higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:00 AM
7

Both do. It's not mutually exclusive. The difference is that the redpill is atleast consistent about it, while feminists argue women should be sheltered like children when it's beneficial to them and argue they should be treated like adults when it's beneficial to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:50 AM
5

disappoint her idol or say no. My opinion on this stuff is that male sexuality is inherently predatory How is this then male predatoriness? This is a woman incapable of asserting her boundaries, and the man can't mind read - he isn't predatory for not being able to do that. This is not male predatoriness, calling it such is female entitlement (expecting others to magically know her expectations despite voicing the exact opposite). In such a situation, this would purely be the fault of the female…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:48 AM
13

Women try to be dishonest about their age to their benefit, this is somehow men's responsibility ​ lol are you females literally incapable of ever holding any other female responsible?? seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:45 AM
3

I think women see male sexuality as inherently predatory In other news, water is wet. Women are not attracted to most men, so the dynamic women perceive to be between women and most men (the exception being the "chads" - who women are actually attracted to) basically becomes that between the woman and a skeevy salesman trying anything in his hand, honest/moral or not, to try and "cheat" women out of their sex. In that view, male sexuality is exploitative because it tries to get the best possible…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:42 AM
1

On the surface level in a vacuum, I see your point. This may be the most straightforward interpretation of the two statements. There's a ton of subtext you're ignoring though. Hair can be styled in any way and, for most people and in most cases, isn't tied to sexuality, isn't tied to an implication of using someone for sex. So a compliment for hair is a compliment of skills of the barber and the person's ability to select a style that's pleasant to look at. So, there are some functions/skills be…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:36 AM
1

No, most end with the woman realizing she won’t be able to lock down who she’s truly attracted to so she goes for the stable option.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:09 AM
2

Getting relationships/dates isn’t actual proof the woman is attracted to you, most women end up in relationships with dudes who they wouldn’t entertain for casual sex even if they were part of the casual market before hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:05 AM
1

If "scrutiny" is necessary, there is no real attraction lol. Attraction isn't something you only recognize if you are looking for it, it's something that hits you in the face like a ton of bricks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 11:55 PM
0

You aren't your own type; and that's okay. I'm not my own type either. But I'm somebody's type. There is no reason to believe that. Stop spouting platitudes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 11:52 PM
1

It tells me that no matter who I approach if she hasn't approached me she is not into me. Correct. Some men would rather live a delusion and pretend otherwise, and most men just don't even really care if the woman is actually in to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 11:51 PM
0

Red pill is bullshit because it paints men as the virtuous sex. Redpill makes no such claim of virtues or vices for anyone. It simply says "if you want a lot of casual sex, and are amoral, here is how to do it".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 05:18 AM
0

It has nothing to do with any of this. It is as simple as younger women are generally much hotter. That is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 11:15 PM
1

Most men would be willing to wait for a woman they genuinely want to date that has consistent standards in waiting. What men are averse to is a woman who has had casual sex/ONS/slept with others on the first date, yet wouldn’t do so with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 10:05 PM
1

I do not think the social norms regarding what is considered creepy are the way they are because of the statements themselves, therefore it is not the case that that statement would be viewed as creepy coming from a man of any attractiveness. Creepy implies more than just not wanting to associate with a person - it is a value judgement. I fail to see what is inherently wrong with the statement “I love your tits, let’s fuck”. What women consider creepy is the very fact of a a man they are in attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 10:01 PM
1

I would kill to have unsolicited and overly sexualized approaches
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:59 PM
2

The average man? Nothing. The attractive gigachads? Everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:58 PM
1

ITT: people who don’t understand hypotheticals
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:56 PM
2

Hmm. Is a woman preferring a man taller than herself a hypocritical action? After all, by definition she would not reach her own height preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:53 PM
2

He’s calling them hurdles they are hurdles to men, because commitment usually is an unequal exchange between the woman and man that the woman wants commitment from. The active, pursuant, romance-giving role has traditionally always been the man’s, and that’s still mostly true even today.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 09:35 PM
2

If men did not chase, most men would not have options. Men would prefer to sit back and have someone shot interest and pursue them for a change, but they don’t wait for this to happen because it likely won’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:47 PM
1

Actually, iterated prisoner’s dilemna still has the same unique mash equilibrium of defecting every time being optimal. It’s not a matter of short sightedness, for the market to change most of the actors within it have to. Being desperate now does not screw you from getting women in the future - men as a whole being desperate does. You not being desperate does not change that to any significant extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:44 PM
16

This is unrealistic for the average man if he wants to get anything at all
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:40 PM
1

> Not understanding why a person doesn't like feeling like a commodity is classic autism. I understand why someone would not want to be treated as an inhuman commodity with no agency of their own - the issue is the denial of agency. But that is not how the word is being used in the context of saying humans are commodities in an abstract market. In the context of an abstract market, the word commodity does not even refer to any property of thing being viewed as commodities. It simply means the th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 11:27 PM
1

What makes you think I shouldn’t be so sure? Considering autism mostly manifests through odd nonverbal behavior/lack of understanding of other’s nonverbal behavior, rigid thought patterns and routines, and sensory sensitivity to surroundings, there would literally be no way for you to even have the slightest indication of whether or not I could possibly be autistic because none of that can be indicated on online text comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:41 PM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 09:35 PM
1

Lol women don’t want partner that is equal, they want a partner that is better in atleast some aspects and atleast equal in all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:10 PM
1

As you yourself said, in a literal sense people are objects, that recognition isn’t an objectification. Objectification isn’t a reduction to the recognizance that something is an object, because that isn’t a reduction - literally everything is an object. The property of being an object is just the mere property of tangible existence. Rather, objectification is the reduction to the connotations people assign to the word object - I.e. as an object less than human. Language is funny like that, infl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:03 PM
1

Why not? The application of the word commodity is meaningless towards the thing which it describes in this context - describing it as a commodity is not a statement of the thing in of itself but rather the framework used to analyze it. What about that framework makes people feel bad? Is it literally just the excessive overmoralized connotation people assign to the word commodity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:56 PM
0

This is true for some odd reason. The explanations for why women don’t want to is inline with general female behavior, but it’s a mystery as to why men don’t want to. Currently, my hypothesis is that a lot of men are just foid brained. There are significantly more men who are willing to talk like this or engage with those who talk like this, than women, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:47 PM
2

Honestly, I don’t think describing people as objects or animals in a vacuum is inherently objectifying - objectifying is being seen as a non human object. The context in which those words are sued give them the meaning of a NONHUMAN [object/animal], however in the case of a clinical description of the dating market there is no such moralizing like that attached to it - by definition of it being clinical.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:37 PM
3

it’s dehumanizing to consider people a product Product is not mutually exclusive with human, it’s not a denial of their agency, therefore it is not dehumanizing. Product isn’t even a description of an attribute the object itself but rather moreso a statement of what framework will be used - therefore the statement “X is a product” really has no significance or meaning in a vacuum. People taking offense to it under the elaborate connotations they attach to it is simply moralizing a clinical descr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:32 PM
2

Utilizing the concept of a sexual marketplace isn’t incompatible with being neurotypical however. It isn’t incompatible with getting social conventions, really it’s the opposite - being able to analyze social conventions in a detached way gives you greater insight to their workings.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:21 PM
2

How does viewing dating as a market imply a neurological problem or disorder? That’s quite a wild assumption to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:16 PM
2

This makes sense for why women are avoidant of systemizing the dating market, but many men also are and this doesn’t really explain that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:15 PM
1

Question: why are people averse to describing interpersonal relationships in a detached, clinical way?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:14 PM
2

Yes, and it’s not just women surprisingly - many men also seem to take viewing dating through economic terms are morally wrong to do for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:11 PM
5

The bar for men is in hell Not according to the OKCupid data lol. The reason the bar is in hell on other aspects is because men that are physically attractive to women are so extremely rare that women have to compromise on standards for that elite subset of men. For most men, they are held to far higher standards than women, mostly because there are almost no standards imposed by men on women - men do not have the leverage to implement such standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:03 PM
1

What do you expect them to say? “Well I’m not garbage so I guess I deserve hot garbage too”? Yes Women talk about how men who are struggling tend to shoot above their league, yet when they are struggling by shooting above their league they turn around and blame men for not being good enough for them (even though they are just as bad). I simply expect honesty and a lack of hypocrisy from women, but I guess that’s too much to ask because women don’t use language to discuss truths, they use it sole…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 03:53 PM
1

Requirements are a type of preference, and even if they weren't - so what? The same logic of 'hypocrite' you used still applies. So either the preference (which can be a requirement) of a woman wanting a man taller than her is hypocritical, or it's not hypocritical for men to have n-count preferences (which include requirements).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:02 AM
1

Macro scale economic forces likely have/do affect it to some degree, even if the connection at the isolated microscopic scale isn’t obvious. The forces of society did not start existing only when the social sciences started getting studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 09:21 PM
0

Quite literally all 4 of those apply, because they are all restatements of the same thing pretty much: an exchange mediated by economic forces. Which is true, access to sex with a female acts effectively as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 09:08 PM
2

But… setting a limit like 100 or virgin is an arbitrary view of “too many” or “too few”… you contradict yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:11 PM
3

Just because it isn’t a tangible and expendable resource doesn’t mean it isn’t a resource in the more general sense (commodity would be a more accurate word). And it being an experience is not mutually exclusive with it being a commodity - when you ride a rollercoaster you have to pay for, that is both an experience and a commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:08 PM
1

Women don’t tend to think a high body count in a man is unattractive. Usually the opposite, they prefer it as it indicates the man is competent enough to get women. There are two main factors that cause variance in how much sex someone has: how impulsive one is/how much one wants sex, and how many partners one can get up to their want. Most variance in female body count is variance in the former, while most variance in male body count is variance in the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 08:06 PM
1

Sure, but we are talking about sexual attraction here, not love. In order for a woman to love a man, she would have to be sexually attracted to him, and the person I was responding to claimed this sexual attraction for relationships is different than sexual attraction for getting casual sex which is what I’m denying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 08:53 PM
1

Are you a brainlet? You are just proving what he said He said women don’t have a need to carve out a name for themself; they are often content with raising and rearing children You then said he doesn’t know anything about women because you don’t need to carve out a name for yourself and are content raising and rearing children.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 08:09 PM
1

That makes no sense - for whatever mechanisms generate attraction for relationships beyond casual sex, how do they not factor in casual sex? Attraction is attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 08:02 PM
1

The ‘ick’ is completely a product of the foid mind, and as such only women and foid brained men feel the ‘ick’.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:30 PM
1

Is a woman wanting a man taller than her hypocritical because by definition she then wouldn’t meet her own height standard? Or better yet, would a straight man be hypocritical for wanting a woman that’s attracted to men despite the straight man not being attracted to men himself? I don’t think dimorphic preferences are necessarily hypocritical, because they are dating preferences rather than moral judgements.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:23 PM
3

Jfl the main difference between the male lists and the female lists are sheer length.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:20 PM
1

Social intelligence doesn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 07:18 PM
2

I also wish that. I’ve made similar rants, nothing that most of courtship behaviors males do really is in some sense “simping”, and your viewpoint is one I agree with. I just don’t see how going to Southeast Asia is overrating women - the reason I suggested SEA rather than prostitution/sugaring is precisely because the latter reinforces the “overratedness” of female sexual value while the former (what I suggested) somewhat reverse it by basically reversing what is usual - now you have all the wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 08:26 AM
1

Jfl, not safe enough to leave but safe enough to cheat which is possibly one of the most enraging things a male partner would be able to ascertain if they find out. This is why I don’t take females seriously when they talk about their male partner abusing them but then they go and cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 08:12 AM
1

I fail to see how it’s degrading. Once again they aren’t trashier, they are just easier for white guys. And while it’s no Europe, it’s by no means the cesspool of the planet. Especially being a westerner, you can live pretty nicely while you are traveling there with the money you have. I agree no such advice is given to women. Because women do not have issue obtaining sex, they can get it on demand basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 08:10 AM
2

You are right that that isn’t suggested to women, bc women don’t have to do that. Women can get sex on demand wherever. Southeast Asian women aren’t really lower tier, esp the ones white dudes in SEA can pull. They are just white worshipping moreso than low tier. I am also not suggesting he moves, he can simply take a week long or so vacation to there and rack up easily an n count of 5 or 6 within that time period if he’s white and just jumps on tinder over there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 08:01 AM
1

The reason men focus on getting a girl is because that’s the usual rate limiting step for them. Men impose very lax conditions for compatibility only because they have to in order to not significantly struggle with women - if they focused on compatibility and filtered more women out, that’s a sure fire way to almost never get any success considering female selectiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 04:45 AM
1

No, dating survives because women are extremely susceptible to group ideals and pressure, and a common western one is the romanticization of long term monogamous LTRs. Are they actually attracted to most of these guys that they even marry? I would say most of the evidence points towards no.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 02:20 AM
1

Almost every women doesn’t go after a broad range of men, they wait for the broad range of men to come to them and then maybe reluctantly date them for the stability. The men that women go after are the ones that women pursue in the way men pursue average women - and that definitely isn’t a broad range, it’s the elite selection of chads which are the only men women are actually sexually attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 02:13 AM
-1

If you are white you should travel to Phillippines or Thailand, the very fact of you being white there puts you above 99% of the population SMV wise in the eyes of Thai or Filipina women. It’s not even gold digging/prostitution, the women are legitimately attracted to you because they fetishize whiteness - see the ascendancy of itsOVER as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 02:00 AM
15

Why do women require “anticipation” (mind reading). Are they not adults that can use their mouth to directly communicate to others?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 01:47 AM
1

You originally said otherwise tho.. you said it isn’t the case in modern times.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 02:28 AM
1

As of current times, this usually isn't the case. Iirc, around 80% of the time it's still men paying for first dates
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 07:00 AM
16

You don't even need a study to prove what is obvious. Most females have more options in sex than any of them could reasonably want, so the rate limiting factor and therefore the factor that controls for most variance in promiscuity for females is impulsivity. For most men, the rate limiting factor is their ability to get women, therefore male promiscuity is far less dependent on their impulsivity than female promiscuity. More impulsive, risk-taking, short-sighted people are more likely to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:46 PM
0

The dividing line between what one considers as part of their identity and what one doesn't is pretty arbitrary and isn't the reason many men dislike gold digging. The "dehumanization" aspect of it is not the reason I, and I would wager most men, don't want gold digging. It is purely a practical reason - gold digging women tend to cheat or monkey branch, it isn't a very stable basis for a long term relationship. It has nothing to do with "not being seen for oneself!11!!!" or whatever feminine bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:41 PM
0

What does it mean to be treated as a possession/object! It's such an ill-defined phrase that keeps on getting thrown around. From many of what people describe as being "viewed as a possession", I would gladly have many of those treatments towards me lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:37 PM
1

You have sexual objectification in viewing a person as either a visual or tactile means for sexual pleasure.You have objectification in viewing a person as a tool that performs a job without considering their deeper emotional state or history. Cashiers, bus drivers, and the like.You have objectification in viewing a person as a highly complex you rent or use to get a specific kind of labor done, where upkeep and maintenance of the tool is part of your responsibility, an employer, or someone hiri…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:37 PM
0

What does it mean for a person to be treated as a thing? Clearly, the set of actions permissible towards humans aren't completely exclusive with the set of actions permissible towards nonhuman things - the fact that I sometimes check out at an automated checkout and sometimes check out at a cashier doesn't mean I am objectifying them despite the fact that I am 'treating' both things the same. ​ If we try and take your definition of owned/traded, bought, sold, discard, broken, this is still hugel…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:33 PM
1

But what exactly does it even mean to see someone as an object? Obviously it doesn't mean quite literally thinking they aren't biologically human, so there's some subtle equivalence set up but nobody ever bothers to define what kind of equivalence they are using when they say someone is "objectifying". The closest I can ascertain is deriving benefit from the actions of another - e.g. running through women like a fuckboy or catcalling. I've seen women say prostitution is objectification. Clearly …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 08:29 PM
1

Every time a straight person has sex with a new partner, a person of the opposite sex also gets a new partner, because if the person had the other as a partner before, then the other also had the person as a partner before… therefore straight people cannot skew the numbers. Chad fucking around cannot skew it in the way you say it does - only lying and homosexuality can. And I am not ruling out homosexuality - I literally said that is what can skew the numbers to not be the same in my original co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:35 AM
1

If you would have read properly, you would have see I was talking about average amount of partners most people had. Not how many time men and women have sex. Average number of partners for gender X = how many times gender X has sex / total number of members of gender X. Since there are roughly equal numbers of men and women, the total amount of times men/women have sex being equal implies the average number of partners is equal. Yet the woman would seemingly have had more sexual partners on aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 07:54 PM
1

Oh my god you brainlet, it doesn’t matter how much of an exaggerated outlier a given straight person is, since every time they have sex a person of the opposite sex also has sex, so no matter what the average would be the same. The only things skewing it are lies and homosexuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 07:01 PM
1

Yeah but even if they are straight outliers, every time they have sex a person of the opposite sex also has sex therefore it doesn’t create a difference in the averages. The only things that can create differences in the averages are homosexuals and lies
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 06:05 PM
1

Even for chads and straight manhoes, everytime they have sex a woman also has sex so that also doesn't make it uneven. The real reason is because of gay men, who have comical amounts of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:25 PM
11

As a black woman you are about the same sexual value as an Indian man. And before everyone gets angry at that - be angry at everyone (men AND women) and the reality that dating statistics show. What the dating statistics show is that black women still have more sexual options than any race of man. You have lower sexual value compared to other races of women, but still more SMV than the average man of any race.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:17 PM
-1

> New product is introduced women have to compete with > Rather than competing, women reeee that it's man bad for using better product
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:05 PM
6

Unless you’re giving him advice on how to rape, how exactly is giving casual sex advice screwing others over? Any advice would be yielding in consensual sex, yk where both parties agree to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 04:33 PM
5

kek is it hypocrisy for a non 6ft woman to want a 6ft man?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 04:44 AM
2

Ok. That is you. That doesn’t make the outlook repulsive in the universal sense, it only makes it repulsive to you. And even it is repulsive so what?? That has no bearing on its accuracy lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:48 PM
2

Why is my outlook repulsive? Accuracy is repulsive now? And yes I would describe my views to a partner, but even if I wouldn’t so what? What relevance does that have to the accuracy of treating it like a market when trying to describe/predict dynamics? The accuracy is the only thing that matters for that…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:45 PM
6

It is in their nature and that’s why I don’t expect women to communicate directly. I don’t see why this should negate my desire for that however, even if it is a fantasy, the hypothetical of a woman communicating directly is better than a woman not communicating indirectly. Reading the room and body language awareness is firmly in the bin of stupid shit in my mind - it’s damn near impossible and serves no purpose as anything that can be communicated through it can be communicated far easier and …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:43 PM
2

Most men who get relationships definitely searched for them, and not every agent in the haircut example is actively searching outwards for those to make an exchange with - like the barber. Even then, so what? Similar mechanics still apply lol what is hard to get about that
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:40 PM
16

Eh, this is somewhat true but also women are legitimately better at reading subtle social cues than men on average, I just don’t understand why they would expect it when they can use their words.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:23 PM
3

Ok but your personal dating decisions don’t have much to do with whether it’s correct to apply market mechanics - and it is. The same reasoning behind the effects that go into a market of haircut services go into the workings of who has sex and relationships with who - so it acts as a market. If it acts as a market, what exactly is the issue with accurately treating it as such?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:21 PM
4

Yes there is a friendship market. In the abstract sense a partner’s sex or commitment is a commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:17 PM
18

It is true. Women have a mouth, they can speak, they can use their words to directly speak yet many times expect the man to just know off of some indirect esoteric indecipherable thing such as “reading the room” or “telling from body language”. It isn’t exclusive to women, to some extent most men do it too which is annoying, but this is especially the case with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:16 PM
3

What about seeing it as a market? In the abstract sense it is a market.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:10 PM
24

Women care about fairness to the individual when it benefits them regardless of any pragmatism and then when it comes to men pragmatism over fairness is all that matters. It just proves male disposability again and again - the individual man does not matter beyond the value he provides to society
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:05 PM
7

Nobody said shit about obligations, but what you said is plain wrong that if a man raises his standards he would be just as successful as women. It’s not correct bc individual agents aren’t price setters.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 05:02 PM
4

Yeah sure there are men who pull that shit, but there are more women who do so because women on avg are more attention needy and insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:59 PM
1

Men seeing women as interchangeable is almost required for male success in the SMP because of how female mate choice operates.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:59 PM
4

I doubt intelligence is driving men away. I think wanting to be stay at home, which requires men to uphold traditional responsibilities, drives away men as a lot of the women who expect traditional responsibilities from the man, often think they are exempt from their traditional role in terms of being submissive. There’s also the fact that more educated and intelligent women still want a man who is above them in that, which narrows down their pool ridiculously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:55 PM
8

Their biologically higher standards comes from the biology of the female sex tho. Men who have that same level of “self respect” as in female level standards aren’t as successful as women, because individual agents aren’t price setters. It’s only as a GROUP women having higher standards for men than vice versa, is what leads women to have the leg up in the SMP, and any individual man raising his standards would only be reducing his options, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:52 PM
6

That is not what he said at all lol what schizophrenic rant are you on about? He said nothing about not treating each person as an individual, he simply said the group differences are larger than what is usually portrayed - it’s not “not so different”. In addition, treating each person as an individual in every circumstance is an idealistic fantasy, I doubt many women are treating each men “as an individual” when they see a man walking down a near sidewalk at night and avoid him. Similarly, men …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:46 PM
64

Women expect mind reading from men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:39 PM
4

I don’t think this is unpopular considering I doubt many men would complain about getting “used” for sex lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:39 PM
2

I disagree that a modern relationship in the west requires more work for women - really the opposite, the active role of the relationship is played by men usually, which you can see by who is responsible for most of the courtship and planning and doing in most relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:36 PM
18

Men are still more desperate for even love or romantic connection - look at how many people pay for twitch thots despite the availability of free porn. And far more single women aren’t looking compared to single men. Women are usually more desperate for attention though, they tend to be ridiculously insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:34 PM
3

I mean, any statement can be interpreted any way, but you gotta look at the most reasonable interpretations of the statements - and it is a huge far cry to interpret “nice tits!” as a denial of agency or value besides what is provided (tits) - just like it would be a far cry for a barber to interpret “nice haircut” as a statement that his only worth derives from the haircuts he does and there is no agency he has over who and how he cuts the hair of. And yes, a barbers skills are mutable while ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 10:47 PM
3

I think people misunderstand the meaning of objectification. Both humans and objects can serve as a means to an end, saying a woman has nice titties or wanting a 5’8” DD blonde wife is no more objectifying than saying a barber gives nice haircuts or solely wanting a barber that gives really good haircuts. The difference between humans and objects is that humans have agency - and it is denial of agency in the pursuit of using the other person as a means to an end that is objectification - not sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 06:55 PM
7

Ugly women have somewhat higher n count, their insecurity drives them to sleep with more guys. You can see this with n count vs BMI. Antisocial women don’t have high n count because their antisocial it’s means they want to fuck others far less, not because they have less options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 06:42 AM
2

What a ridiculous fucking thread from someone who doesn’t understand basic arithmetic. Of course the average is the same - sex the vast majority of the time only and exactly involves one man and one woman, so the total male n count and total female n count both increase by one. There are an almost equal number of males and females, so the average increases by the same amount. Therefore it is never unbalanced. The difference is the distribution of the n count. Most men have significantly lower n …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 06:41 AM
1

Women don’t tend to play the game of wooing men - does that mean they don’t treat men like people??
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:57 PM
1

Why are they any more deserving of ‘courtship’ than courtship these same women give to men which is absolutely zero because they want to always take the passive role?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:47 PM
3

Chad is high value in RMV because women tend to want him to commit to them, regardless if he’s planning on doing that or lying about planning on doing that or explicitly not doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:58 PM
9

Women say this but it rarely plays out, because male promiscuity and female promiscuity signal fundamentally different things. Which is why men on avg are far less attracted to passed around women as LTR options whole women on average are very slightly more attracted to sexually success in men even for LTR option.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:48 PM
2

You get it wrong. Chad isn’t low value for women looking for an LTR - on avg women don’t have nearly the same aversion to manwhoring that men have to whoring (for good reason - for women, variance in number of partners is mostly caused by variance in impulsiveness while for men variance in number of partners is mostly caused by variance in value.). Chad is able to get lots of sex precisely because he’s high value - if he was low value he wouldn’t be chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:22 PM
1

“It’s trauma that I’m sexually desired :(((((” The mind of complete entitlement and solipsism
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:19 PM
1

There is huge common variance in what people constitute as ‘attractive’ - unless you are denying the very existence of conventional attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 05:11 PM
6

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 04:37 AM
1

a) being attracted to a 16 year old is not pedophilia Jfl b) she wasn’t just criticizing him for being bad in bed, she shifted the responsibility of her regret in consenting to make it seem like she had no control and was taken advantage of, which isn’t true as I’ve explained c) She doesn’t own the regret just bc she lives with it - by that definition everybody always owns every regret. Her original comment clearly showed she hasn’t owned the regret because she still doesn’t seem to get that it’…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:18 PM
1

Yeah 27 year old men screwing 16 year olds aren’t purposefully making sure there partners are having a good time but neither are 16 year old dudes lol And she isn’t “going hard” back she’s complaining that people are attacking her by your own admission She DID know better though, society isn’t at fault for her own decisions. That’s what I’m saying, those copes that society failed her and that it’s not her own responsibility just isn’t true - her sexual decisions are her fault and no fault except…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 04:00 PM
1

“Women aren’t inherently sexual” is not true. Women seem to have no problem being sexual based off of pure carnal lust during their ho phase with top 20% men. It’s just that women are this for only the very top percent of men. For the rest of men, women are sexually repulsed by them but will settle down with them later in life due to fear of being alone, social pressure to settle down, sometimes money, etc. Important to note, they are not romantically attracted to their partner because a prereq …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 03:49 PM
1

She wasn’t taken advantage of though, because she had more than enough maturity to know better. When someone signs a job offer that they regret 20 years down the road in retirement because they should’ve spent more time with family, did the company suddenly “take advantage” of them? And I know that painful shitty sex is bad but sex with a 16 year old boy tends to be more shitty and painful and than with a 27 year old. With similar physical outcomes for one time sex, the difference in maturity do…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 03:45 PM
1

He had an advantage in maturity, so what. Are corporations not allowed to give job offers now because they have far more experience negotiating salaries? No, because people who are of age to legally work are assumed to be mature enough to handle these decisions - the relative maturity is irrelevant. As for avoiding responsibility, she is doing that by pinning blame on the dude and treating it as if she’s a scenario she was taken advantage of rather than an active consenting participant of a scen…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 03:29 PM
1

irrational, unempathetic takes How is irrational to ask almost a fully grown women to take responsibility for her own actions? And ofc I don’t have empathy for her because it is something she chose. She chose to have sex, she chose to say yes. That’s nobody’s fault except her own at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 03:18 PM
1

“Women aren’t inherently sexual” is a cope. Women seem to have no problem being sexual based off of pure carnal lust during their ho phase with chad. It’s just that women are this for only the very top percent of men. For the rest of men, women are sexually repulsed by them but will settle down with them later in life due to fear of being alone, social pressure to settle down, sometimes money, etc. but they are not romantically attracted to their partner because a prereq to romantic attraction i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 03:03 PM
1

I’ll save your time unlike the rest of these responses - no
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:58 PM
1

Well maybe not JBW overall but definitely brutal ratings for the Asians and the one Indian
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:57 PM
1

Brutal fucking jbwpill
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:49 PM
1

Stalking my profile? Average redditors jfl
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:40 PM
1

Unironically true
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:07 PM
1

The UN gender inequality index is a shit arbitrary index that has factors that don’t even have anything to directly do with gender equality (like MMR) I don’t know of any legal differences in Ukraine between the status of men and women other than the fact that men can get drafted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 01:55 PM
2

We also know women severely underrate men - in that 80% of men are rated below average by women. So the person you are responding to is right - women are hypergamous
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 09:53 PM
1

Based acceptance
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 09:45 PM
2

Did this thread get brigaded?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 09:29 PM
6

But the thing is, if the phrase boyfriend material is used to explain why women won’t put out, guess what implications will be drawn from that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:30 PM
4

The person asked where to meet women for romantic opportunities. Not just meet make friends and socialize - it was specifically for romantic opportunities
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 07:30 PM
5

My guy you literally just suggested these places as a good irl places for finding date opportunities…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 07:24 PM
5

So it is true, but your anecdotes filtered through your confirmation bias refuse to accept it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 07:01 PM
3

How is not realistic at all if it’s correct technically? There is supply, there is demand, it’s a market that can be analyzed using the same abstracted tools used to study other markets for the most part
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 06:47 PM
1

That is true for casual stuff. However, she wasn’t talking about her casual flings being short, she was talking about her exes being short - people who she did have a relationship with that ended up being broken off
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 04:57 PM
10

Yeah and that “single exception” is the only one that went on to be your husband 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 04:14 PM
6

except he’s (my husband is) taller than what I usually prefer It just so happens
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 04:11 PM
20

my husband is much taller It just so happens
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 04:10 PM
2

Tbf mafs is pretty fun
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 02:27 PM
2

Get real. Nobody sees troons as their stated gender, and most uni applications and job hirings explicitly ask for biological sex and not stated gender. Also nobody wants to date a dickgirl, so you basically get none of the advantages I just talked about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 01:00 AM
3

If I’m switching while still preserving my brain, keeping all my thoughts, actions, and desires intact, then I would be lesbian so no I wouldn’t fuck chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 07:27 PM
9

Everything would be easier. Considering the amazing amount of advantages for women in STEM, my future career would go far easier and I would have far more opportunities if I was a woman. Of course, getting sex and relationships would be far easier if I was a woman. I would have a far better safety net if I was a woman. Overall, again, most men I know me included would switch in a heartbeat
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:09 PM
0

The reality is that it IS impossible though. Why are you so hesistant to accept it? And you don’t know how his face looks like or what his race is and the rest of his stats simply don’t matter. It’s all about height face and race and considering his lack of success so far + his shorty height it will be genuinely impossible
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:08 PM
5

It’s normie advice to think he’ll have any success. “Just keep rolling the Boulder up the hill for it to always fall back down bro!!1!11!111”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:57 PM
47

Based. OP’s mindset is that of a child who never bothered to learn how the world actually works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:56 PM
4

Really? Me and most men I know would switch in a heartbeat if it were possible
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:53 PM
8

My god this is such gaslighting normie advice. There is no reason everybody will be able to make it, and considering that he hasn’t a girlfriend yet and he’s short he’s probably going to be incel for the rest of his life. Why can’t you fucking normies just accept that it’s over for some people?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:51 PM
3

Wtf this purge was so short 3 week long purges plz
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:03 PM
9

The blackpillscience sub actually had a post addressing both features of the study. The original looks rate distribution was actually more skewed than even 80/20, and when taking into account the correction from the messaging distribution it worked out to roughly 80/20
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:49 PM
1

Purge week
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:45 PM
–

Kek nobody my looksmatch wants to date me. It’s women who are hypergamous and then project that onto incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:41 PM
–

Obvious fucking larp/troll, seriously you guys fall for bait hard
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:41 PM
–

Basado
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:33 PM
0

19 and 16 is barely a difference kek
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:26 PM
5

If you are talking about the .is forum (formerly .co) that is literally the containment site for the extremists. After the original r/incels got banned the community split into 2 - the moderates went to r/braincels and .co/.is was containment for the extremists. Of course, r/braincels was far far bigger and more popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:22 PM
1

What separates incels from regular virgins is that regular virgins could possibly be voluntarily celibate. That is the only distinction between the 2 categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:51 PM
8

Literally nobody said that femcels aren’t allowed to. My point was that the reason incels and femcels don’t get together is the high standards of femcels, not the high standards of “muh both sides”which the person I responded to was trying to change it to
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:48 PM
–

it is never possible for anything but falling to happen Congratulations, you understood the point Likewise for incels, by definition our celibacy is involuntary (out of our control) - it is never possible for anything but failing to happen when it comes to our romantic lives
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:15 AM
1

Depression in incels is most often a result of how we’ve been treated due to their ugliness and their ever permanent loneliness due to it. As for ASD, yeah it’s overrepresented in the incel community but it’s still rare; extremely far from being a significant portion. And most people who identify as incels are incels - it’s the ones posting their faces everywhere that aren’t and that’s probably who you remember.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:02 AM
1

Just don’t be ugly theory Jfl, ITrannies truly are the highest IQ out there huh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:34 AM
1

Based, beat female cheaters
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:33 AM
1

Men only lack empathy for the woman who claim to be kind readers “oh woman can totally tell the incel on you” who then become very proof that women aren’t mind readers when chad bitchslaps them. And that’s fair, tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:31 AM
1

I thought r/TheRedpill was the containment sub for shitty “yo I totally fucked her pussy!” Larps
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:30 AM
1

Did you even fucking read the post? Men’s racial preferences are far far weaker than woman’s - black women most definitely aren’t even 1/10th in the same boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:26 AM
3

This reads like satire or bait tbh but knowing PPD foids you might be serious…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:24 AM
5

Extreme cope. The blackpill is an accurate model of sexual dynamics and everyone wants to deny it because of the (true) implication that some men will end up permanently alone in life due to their genetic looks
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:24 AM
2

You may be an incel idk but you are definitely not blackpilled - this is probably the most bluepill cuckoldry I’ve seen from a male on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:22 AM
5

Talichads have it right
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:21 AM
1

The post is cutoff for me also… idk what’s up with that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:18 AM
2

Women aren’t funny example #928274748291718
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:18 AM
2

I used to think women were highly manipulative and machevellian. This sub made me realize they don’t have the intelligence to pull that off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:17 AM
9

I do not want a tongue next to my asshole, and I definitely don’t want my tongue next to anyone else’s. Whatever happened to romance man fuck this modern degeneracy, sharia law and Islammaxxing is unironically the only way to save the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:13 AM
7

Download a picture of chad, put it on tinder with a bio about how he fucking hates women and that their only value is from their pussy. See how many offers you get. Misogyny and lack of empathy are absolutely NOT what causes inceldom - it’s only facial ugliness, height, race, and in the rare case of mentalcels - autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:11 AM
3

“He’s so cute teehee I just so happen to have a boyfriend who mogs him to gandy heaven 😍😍”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:08 AM
2

Based, this is why I love purge week
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:07 AM
0

Do you also jump off cliffs and flap your arms to try and fly? Experience is a strict requirement only for fools - the rest of us can learn from observing and studying the world around us. I’ve never asked out a woman in my life yet I know that the results will be negative and that I’m a truecel - no experience needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:06 AM
8

Everybody in this thread is so fucking disgusting Jesus Christ 🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:02 AM
2

For most of us it’s just ugliness, though I guess there are a few mentalcels like you. I wonder if it’s worse to be a mentalcel or a truecel, honestly I think truecel because with the way society treats ugly people your likely to be socially maladjusted anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:01 AM
1

Trying delusional copes in your hopeless optimism isn’t an inherently good thing
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:52 AM
1

Purge week, so sub rules aren’t enforced
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:25 AM
1

Men actually do not have this tendency for other men. Look up the women are wonderful effect - only women have that gender based in group bias
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:16 AM
2

t. Middle school girl Don’t you have homework to finish?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:13 AM
1

t. Drank too much soylent
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:06 AM
-1

Nah, you’re just too autistic to interpret what he said in context
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:03 AM
2

Women do value hyper masculinity though - even in prettyboys who do tend to be more worked out than average, taller than average, and have a lot of traditionally masculine facial traits. Masculinity doesn’t just mean mean having bodybuilder body, you know If you still don’t believe women value hyper-masculinity: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661305003207
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:01 AM
6

Most incels only have mental and emotional issues as a result of how society treats ugly people; the mental problems are an effect not the cause
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:57 AM
3

I can talk to a woman, the question is if they’ll report on the basis of being “creepy” (too ugly)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:55 AM
1

Big neotonous doe eyes are the ideal for women and are the feminine counterpart for hunter eyes, it’s not just “good = masculine”. And with jaw, again the attractive trait on women is a more rounded out face and narrower chin compared to an extremely sharp jawline and broader chin on men. I will agree that a very forward, unrecessed chin is the ideal for both genders, however. The rest are masculine ideals though
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:54 AM
5

Obvious bait from .is thats designed to make ITrannies seethe, and it seems that it worked
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:43 AM
1

Kek the “boyish and sensitive men” still have hunter eyes, broad and forward chin, sharp jaw, non flat face - all of which are masculine variants of the most important traits for facial attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:42 AM
2

The Manosphere is a collection of extremely disparate ideas that bluepillers forced into one tent they called “the manosphere”. Of course it isn’t self consistent because it isn’t one unified ideology. It’s only normshit bluepillers who don’t understand nuance that end up doing this grouping and then cry about inconsistency. No shit Sherlock, different opposing views will disagree with each other even if you place both under the same tent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:39 AM
33

Cope. You just don’t think this because what you think is your looksmatch is actually 2 SMV points above. We’ve all seen how women rate men, what they consider average is well above that - you can’t actually accurately judge your looksmatch because you end up severely underestimating the value of the opposing gender
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:37 AM
1

I think the thing everybody is missing is that a lot of this stuff about themselves and other people being ugly or “subhuman” isn’t a value judgement but rather a commentary of how other people use these factors to make value judgements. The halo effect is so ingrained in you normies head that they think “ugly = bad”, bu in reality when we say this stuff to other incels it’s a simple recognition of the factors that have lead to the other experiencing the shitty circumstances they have had. And s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:35 AM
11

Agreed. It’s to stop the hopeless optimism that people tend to gravitate to, which is very much a good thing. Because hopeless optimism only leads to far far more disappointment in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:30 AM
3

Just world fallacy - if they were treated bad they must have been bad right!!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:29 AM
25

It isn’t a both sides thing. Lonely men are pursuing these lonely women, it’s the lonely women who reject; that’s literally what the meme shows. Incels by in large don’t have impossibly high standards, femcels do
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:27 AM
5

The industrial revolution and its consequences…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:17 AM
3

Yes. But I don’t expect women who are hot, again I already listed my only 2 standards
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:42 PM
1

Schopenhauer was the OG blackpiller
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:02 PM
6

The only standards I have are - not fat (I’m not fat myself so that’s reasonable) - not significantly older than I am And I can’t find a relationship The incel problem isn’t because of muh too high standards, that’s just a normie talking point
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 04:36 PM
15

Had me in the first half
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:47 AM
9

Nope. I’m gen Z, I wish this were true that most of them were blackpilled, but that reallly isn’t the case. One thing I will say is that most of them don’t have the same visceral reaction to blackpillers that millennials have.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:46 AM
1

Especially Indians, it’s so over. There is a good reason Asians and Indians are so massively over represented in the incel community
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:42 AM
2

Tl;dr For most men, women aren’t sexually into you. She will always put in lower effort for you than she will for a person she is attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:44 PM
1

Commitment and resources determine your league - it doesn’t make sense to require certain factors for getting a woman in your league because the entire point of a league is as a function of these factors that determine which percentile you lie for dating desirability.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:20 PM
1

Correct. Again, TRP advocates for unlearning romance and focus on self preservation, and the very reason this is a big part of it is because, without any additional influence like TRP, men do tend to take a romantic POV
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 08:10 PM
1

The reason TRP says that stuff is basically deprogram the romance from romantic men
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 08:09 PM
2

LETS GOOO SHITPOST TIME
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:29 PM
4

In a planet of 7 billion, there will always be exceptions to the rule. Doesn’t change the rule, it is highly unlikely I’ll ever get as lucky as some other short Indian dude in the west slays - it is rather his situation which is unique and highly improbable
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:22 PM
2

I’m a short Indian male living in the west - do you seriously think my lack of knowledge in the dating market is what prevents me from getting laid? I’ve extensively looked into the mechanics of the average chad who gets laid - do you think chad knows what the word hypergamy even means? Getting laid isn’t a product of knowing how the dating market works because if you know how the dating market works, you know that success is based heavily off of uncontrollable genetic factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:18 PM
0

Lol no, women get pumped and dumped by men who they think are in their own league. But we’ve all seen the distribution in how women rate men in attractiveness - the men that women think are in their own league tend to be quite a bit above.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:14 PM
2

It doesn’t require men and women to be the same for this same logic to hold in reverse in this case. Your logic was that lack of approaching/waiting to be approached signifies either: passiveness or lack of interest. So therefore the current paradigm of men approaching women leads to men being with women who are either passive or aren’t actually interested in them. And to be fair, I actually agree with that, which is why I don’t think the expectation of approaching should be placed singularly on…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:13 PM
2

Reading comprehension problems and lack of nuance, the absolute state of PPD females. I said this “problem” of being pumped and dumped when approaching wouldn’t happen if women approached men in their league! If your problems are solely caused by shooting too high out of your league - that isn’t anybody else’s fault, sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:07 PM
2

By that same logic the current paradigm only be edits women at the detriment of men - it leads to men being with women who didn’t like them enough to approach them, or men being with women who are too passive…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:05 PM
2

Cold approaching chad that’s way out of your league will get you pumped and dumped because for long term monogamous relationship he has way better options. Because of hypergamy, of course, this will be the only type of men women approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:04 PM
1

So your lazy and want your husband to do all the work for your satisfaction in bed is the reason your submissive, typical foid moment jfl
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 04:06 PM
2

Almost all the time, really
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 01:49 PM
1

10x the opportunities and encouragement in STEM, despite the prevailing narrative saying the opposite. Reduced prison sentences. Better legal protections and safety nets. More sympathy from women and women (Women are wonderful effect). Women’s survival and wellbeing is prioritized over that of men’s. And for all the complaining about “bodily rights!11!11!!!”, the violation of “bodily rights” that women complain about (abortion) isn’t nearly as severe as that of which men are subject to (draft). …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:20 PM
1

Do you also have a problem dating a man with the latest iPhone, or designer t shirts for the exact reason of those being industries involving highly unethical labor? Do you expect your man to live like a monk since even just buying a tomato means you are finding what probably involved severe exploitation at some step?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 10:14 PM
6

This subreddit has 90,000 members, most of which are male - that’s pretty large
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 09:40 PM
7

Right, I’m disputing whether most men actually think the right is a 9. Again, far too exaggerated. But how bout you post a poll on PPD to settle it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 09:05 PM
6

There is a certain point of exaggeration where it really just becomes grotesque; returns start shooting negative really quickly. The right is well beyond that point. And where is this “polled evaluation of men” that says right is more attractive? I’m sure that most people would agree that the features on the right are just far too exaggerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 08:58 PM
5

Bruh she went from like a 9 (tho tbf this could be inflated bc that’s my type) to a 4, right is not attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 07:45 PM
2

How are women more reward?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 05:13 AM
1

Autists
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 06:11 PM
37

So the problem is that women feel entitled to men above their league kek. When men have dating problems it’s that their standards are too high. When women have dating problems literally due to their standards, it’s men’s fault that supposedly 80% of them aren’t good enough for a 4/10
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 06:03 PM
1

Incels literally do give up that’s literally their entire thing. Are you familiar with incel subculture at all??
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:13 AM
5

Oh cmon, pull up any picture of young lindsay lohan and she’s easily very very attractive. You’re just delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 11:37 PM
6

If this is what you consider average, then maybe the women here do have a point about men only chasing top women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 11:20 PM
7

Women are the gatekeepers of sex and chads are the gatekeepers of commitment. The reason women think that men gatekeeper commitment is because the only men they want commitment from is chad. For the vast majority of men, they don’t get to be choosy for sex or commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 11:15 PM
7

This is the difference here. You’ve asked out one man. Any incel that has asked out only one woman would have been laughed out of the room.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:26 PM
10

Being an ugly women is straight up better than being a moderately attractive male.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 10:14 PM
2

Translation, but without the foid misinterpretation. It sucks being a man when women have all the unearned privilege in the universe and you are treated as disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 09:10 PM
1

She has to be pretty, sweet, gentle, maternal to get chad. A woman can be the ugliest, bitchiest person to exist and still get her looksmatch
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 09:05 PM
2

Was so close to being first this time 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:07 PM
2

Both are a consequence of women’s chad chasing
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 02:02 AM
–

This post has to be a joke post with the steroids, it’s insane
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 12:27 AM
4

Not mentally ill, sorry sweaty try again
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:41 PM
1

Jesus fuck I thought I was pathetic but some of the regular PPDers outrank me in that beyond belief
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 05:00 PM
1

Your the one being supremely dense and misunderstanding the opponents points.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:47 AM
1

I will never understand how dense foids are to the point of complete misunderstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:46 AM
0

there’s no difference between choosing for sex or for relationships Do foids have a reading comprehension problem? That wasn’t my point at all. My point was simple. Every choice is informed by a strategy, and the adoption of a strategy is also a choice, but it’s a choice distinct from the choice resulting from the strategy. Of course, this top level “meta choice” is the result of ones worldview, which is the very top level. In the relevant worldview —> meta choice —> strategy —> choice chain, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:36 AM
1

Calling everything you don’t like a conspiracy, never change bluepill 🤡. I’m not even redpill btw
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:22 AM
2

You were talking about choosing in mate selection, not overall. Your response is about as intelligent as saying “a man chose what breakfast he ate therefore men choose!!1!11!1!1”. Your technically right that men choose to not choose in mate selection - but the result is still that they don’t choose in mate selection
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:16 AM
1

Joining the Taliban will - they went around telling 15 year old women that they will be married off to their fighters.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:09 AM
2

Men literally don’t choose tho lmao have you seen the tinder granny experiment? I know escaping solipsism is difficult for foids but god damn this is basic shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:08 AM
1

The based levels of purge week are off the chart
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:03 AM
1

Realizing that (she’s not yours it’s just your turn) isn’t trust issues, it’s reality
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:58 AM
1

Unironically based t. blackpiller
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:50 AM
1

I’ll take “reusing an old and tired joke in an extremely convoluted format in order to make it seem semi relevant” for $500 Also what’s up with everyone using the jeopardy style responses on PPD all of a suddenv
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:50 AM
1

Purge week is proof foids aren’t funny. Seriously, I can tell the gender of the OP just based off of how much I laughed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:41 AM
1

Based, I’ve been trying to say this all along
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:34 AM
1

r/okbuddybaka, but it works equally well for this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:32 AM
1

Brutally ovER
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 12:42 AM
25

This is scarily accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 12:28 AM
1

Unwanted children, one of the biggest problems of gay men…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 04:10 AM
1

Insanely based and brutally AFBBpilled
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 03:52 AM
4

Vibe is a buzzword used to gaslight blackpillers
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 03:34 AM
–

So women and men are victims of women’s standard Foids ruin everything, in other news water is wet
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 10:29 PM
3

This is completely true. I saw this study showing that 80% of prehistoric women but only 40% of prehistoric men passed on their genes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 11:04 PM
–

"I don't have time right now, but I'd be free after your trip" is not a No, not even a Soft No. It's a Later It would be if women were actually direct and literal, but since women play these bullshit language games and never actually say what they mean, men are forced to play these weird language games and make the most probable interpretation, which in this case is a soft no. In this case, "later" means "later", and not "no" But he doesn't know that... that's the entire point. The most probable…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 03:07 PM
–

Your got the direction of causality reversed. Men look down on short men BECAUSE women look down on short men, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 02:43 PM
1

Regardless, if one has raped by definition they cannot be celibate therefore cannot be an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 09:41 PM
5

Least cognitively dissonant bluepiller
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 09:02 PM
1

"Frame" since what RP men think of as "frame" is often antisocial behavior and manipulation. TRP literally coaches men to emulate subclinical personality disorders. Why should women prefer that. I don't know why women prefer that, but the fact is women do prefer that. The redpill simply takes the approach of "what works, works"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 09:20 PM
0

If your chad, you'll have tons of success either way. If your not chad, you won't have any success either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 09:19 PM
1

take the tedpill
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 09:18 PM
3

Men don't have to be attractive to get girls I personally don't date ugly guys anymore meme gender
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 09:46 PM
0

nice argument
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 12:04 AM
1

Not like you speak for every women in the world either lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 11:56 PM
0

I hope you realize women literally don’t think like this. lol they absolutely do
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 10:55 PM
3

exactly, so if I'm not good looking (I mean: I'm fucked in the genetics department) there is nothing I could do? if your a guy, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 09:16 PM
0

PPD: All of life is StUdIeS and StAtS! If you can’t boil the human experience down to scientific data, it didn’t happen. Unironically yes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 08:08 PM
5

"Rules" by women were only made for the sole purpose of keeping ugly men away. So the answer to "to what extend do women break rules for alphas?" is simply: yes
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 08:07 PM
0

Not if what you want is a real companion cucked if you want that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 03:59 AM
2

Pretty much yeah; that's why i said men and women have the same average IQ but men have a far higher variability.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 01:05 AM
2

A good woman is priceless. A bad woman is a pestilence I guess we agree then that all women are pestilence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 11:55 PM
1

Ah idk bro, sometimes it is legit psychotic dudes, like one dude was like hey cutie you so cute i want to take care of you and buy you flower and in less than an hour go kys and be rape....cus she didnt answer him, she said she was busy lmaoo Uhh hello? based!!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 10:20 PM
6

You are completely right. But you know how much women love to complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 10:02 PM
1

Nobody wants to lock down some hot floozy who only knows how to post filtered pics and spend. If that's your ideal of a lifepartner you should be checked for prions. what's wrong with this? this is exactly the type I want to lock down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 09:59 PM
10

Some woman claims that the current state of academia is sexist as there aren't that many women in the upper echelons Respond by showing that men have far higher variability in IQ meaning the freaks off nature nobel prize winners are more likely to be male despite the average intelligence of females and males being the same. Get booted from the server for sexism Lurk on my alt acc, all the women are raging saying i was sexist and claiming that i said women are dumber than men and could never make…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 09:48 PM
3

Doesn't change the fact that currently speaking black people are more dangerous as a group, even if it is due to socioeconomic factors. Therefore by your logic black people are shittier.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 06:26 PM
7

bruh For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, depending on the models used, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level. Being unattractive decreased the probability of social ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 03:15 PM
4

bruh For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, depending on the models used, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level. Being unattractive decreased the probability of social ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 03:14 PM
3

Not to these guys they aren’t. Every time I’ve challenged a guy’s claim that “all women have tons of men to choose from,” it gets switched to “well, women in their 20s who aren’t fat or ugly.” So... more like maybe 20% of women on the dating market at most? And they say we only want the top 20%... lol Sure about that? ​ "For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a h…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 03:12 PM
6

Black people as a group are more dangerous than white people. You don't see anyone calling black people "shittier in general" without being called out for being racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 02:55 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 02:45 PM
1

Will have sex with a girl who's scared or obviously turned off, even if she "consents" Yes. What's wrong with this? She consented? Won't stop sex if the girl is obviously in pain (even if she doesn't ask to stop) Yes. As long as she doesn't ask to stop, then so what? Sexual strategy is to isolate a girl and heavily pressure her As long as everything is consensual I don't see a problem. Everything is inherently manipulative to some extent. Blow up if their SO refuses sex Sex is a necessary compon…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:57 PM
0

Approximately the cost of a hooker
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:19 PM
1

The blackpill has the most data backing up out of any of the pills, so I wouldn’t really say the blackpill is a false model.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 08:58 PM
1

disregard any reported experiences Anecdotes aren't evidence. Go back to stats 101
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 07:20 PM
1

First of all, if you aren't a red piller, you are a blue piller. Now, to address the rest of your points. So I, as a blackpilled incel, am bluepilled just because i'm not redpilled?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 07:18 PM
1

Well I mean if women show that they want abusive men in studies then I guess I have to believe they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:49 PM
1

Except I pulled up studies which study what women themselves want and they show that women want misogynistic and sociopathic men
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:21 PM
1

Anecdotes aren’t evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:41 PM
1

You can use sci hub to read the full article instead of just the abstract and 335 is a very decent sample size
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:41 PM
1

if you're main goal is to empty your balls then yes, but i think deep down we all want more Lmao, everybody likes to pretend they're deep and "want more" than that, but the truth is when it comes to romantic relationships men and women only care about attractiveness (or money but in that case all they are after is the money they aren't attracted to the person making it).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:50 AM
1

Our results suggest that the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness, specifically that he or she was higher than the responder on physical attractiveness, was, amongst the traits studied here, the only significant predictor of romantic interest. bruh the science shows only looks matter. Personality can't be the cause of my romantic failures cause clearly personality does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:48 AM
1

They enjoy more narcissistic, misogynistic and sociopathic traits in general, not necessarily being raped and murdered. Do you know what "not hyperbolizing" means? Try it sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:48 AM
1

If you reject a peer reviewed academic study wtf is your standard of evidence then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:46 AM
2

based
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:44 AM
2

Except it is true. Personality doesn't matter to women (and men also, but men don't gaslight about it) source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/per.2087
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 02:31 AM
3

Except it all comes down to compatibility of personalities. Our results suggest that the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness, specifically that he or she was higher than the responder on physical attractiveness, was, amongst the traits studied here, the only significant predictor of romantic interest. even the way you look My "personality" isn't the reason I'm a 5'3" curry with a recessed jaw. Why is this so hard to grasp? Because its blatantly untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 02:29 AM
2

Sociology studies are made for the primary purpose of ascertaining how real life social interaction works and they do it far better than anecdotes - anecdotes aren't evidence. Clearly from all these studies it must be reasonable to conclude women are attracted to men who are misogynist and psychopathic...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 02:27 AM
1

The way the women talk over here has made me more blackpilled than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:38 PM
1

How is it gross to want youth? Is it also gross for women to want a certain height??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:36 PM
1

Your better off listening to the studies than any internet forum or anecdotes. And the studies show that if your an unattractive male, its over no woman ever wants you. Truly only one pill is right, and it isn't the bluepill or redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:34 PM
1

High value women aren't the ones that are "intelligent" or whatever, high value women means big tiddies, an hourglass figure, and a nice face.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:33 PM
3

Dating is two people coming together, finding out about each other, seeing if their personalities connect and perhaps pursuing the adventure further, and so forth. Dating is just a glorified mating ritual to lead into another glorified ritual (marriage). There is no evidence suggesting that it has anything to do with personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:29 PM
6

Finding a good man who treats them like a human being, not as a toy, fashion accessory, or a punching bag. Women don't want "a good man that treats them like a human being": Women tend to be attracted to the Dark Triad—narcissism, manipulativeness, & psychopathy More psychopathic men tend to receive higher attractiveness ratings from women Women desiring marriage and commitment are more attracted to narcissistic men Misogynistic men are more sexually active than most men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:27 PM
3

It is misogynist. It makes all women out to be a shallow superficial hivemind that only cares about looks, status, and money So what if it is misogynist if it is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:23 PM
2

All these bollocks theories about hypergamy and 80/20 and so forth, just cult-speak for "We ain't got a clue. We'll make something up to explain why." Why are they bollocks if they have a ton of scientific evidence behind them??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 09:22 PM
1

Yeah I want actual experiments that show that being a woman makes one taken less serious. Considering hidden motivations, cognitive biases, etc. I can't really trust first hand accounts or surveys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 05:21 AM
1

The Doormat. This is the girlfriend he’s living with. While she works her ass off, he’s leeching off her and not contributing to the household expect for validation and sex. It's a poor man’s version of a sugar relationship. If the bad boy is the one leeching off how is it bad for him? The Hoes. Bimbos, sluts, whores, whatever you call them, they’re hyper-sexual women that make terrible girlfriends. Typically the sidechick he's cheating on doormat with. They’re the female equivalent of “bad boys…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:12 PM
1

Studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 06:05 PM
2

I'm asking if there is evidence that women are taken less seriously due to their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 02:56 PM
1

Men make up 70% of the homeless.).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 02:55 PM
0

You're physically stronger Matters very little in the developed world less likely to be sexually assaulted Sexual assault is extremely rare for both genders, and males are far more likely to be on the receiving end of every single violent crime except sexual assault more likely to be taken seriously at work Evi? more likely to be a CEO Are males more likely to be a CEO due to gender or due to simply biological realities on the assertiveness of each gender? less likely to develop breast cancer An…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 02:54 PM
1

Women, for example, complain that they aren't taken seriously in their jobs Is there any evidence for this though?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 02:48 PM
1

Most people aren't fine with their partners cheating women are completely fine with sharing if there partner is a top 20% man
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:02 AM
1

Regardless of your legally uneducated opinion, any court in the land would rule that she would be fired if she didn't have sex with the pilot. She would have been I agree. But she wouldn't have gotten laid off because she didn't have sex with him but because everybody else was getting laid off - she had the privilege to keep her job because of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:01 AM
1

how so? the only people wronged in this situation were the laid off coworkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:38 AM
1

A very small percentage of the population admit to being polyamorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:38 AM
1

Isn't cheating if all partners are ok and happy with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 10:43 PM
1

Are you scared a plane is going to crash on you every time you walk outside?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 10:43 PM
1

run the risk of standing up for yourself and opening yourself up to an attack. Attacks are insanely rare. And rejecting a person asking you out is a minor inconvenience for 2 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:26 PM
1

Women's relationships are basically soft harems with top 20% men
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:25 PM
1

Just because they asked you out doesn't mean they won't leave you alone
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:19 PM
1

who are all the women in relationships with? They are in relationships with betabuxx who they settled for after having chad ravage them in their 20's. That's not a happy relationship according to your criterion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:13 PM
1

Yeah ur right actually I am wrong; if you are a women or are in the top 20% of men you absolutely can have a happy relationship as you described it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:08 PM
1

I don’t care how hot or smooth you are, hostage situations are selfish. how tf is that a hostage situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:05 PM
1

disadvantage myself how do you disadvantage yourself? wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:05 PM
1

Sue for what? Nothing wrong was done to her, the only people who should be able to sue are her laid off male coworkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 09:03 PM
1

what issue? she had complete privilege in the situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:58 PM
1

It is a privilege to be able to use sex to avoid being fired when everybody else is being fired.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:53 PM
1

The difference is that physicists have common sense enough to learn and accept elementary stuff such as the strong interaction holding the nucleus together. The same cannot be said about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:51 PM
1

Where you don't care about "whos winning" and you genuinely care about your partner Relationships like this are a disney dream; they don't exist in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:47 PM
2

you cannot blame a patriarchal society (which does exist) lol sure it does cuck
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:45 PM
2

The true blackpill is that all relationships for men not in the top 20% lookswise is basically prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:44 PM
1

100%. This line of thinking is equivalent, on a much grander scale, to how shy virgins over-systemize interactions with hit women, and the result is simply them never getting laid, what a shit ending to the movie not getting laid can only be due to looks proof: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/per.2087 This is why hedonism is superior to nihilism; if nothing truly "matters", then at least enjoying what you've got in life is the next best thing to "matter" based
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:43 PM
1

Stop pretending that this isn't far more common amongst women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:39 PM
1

forced to fuck someone for your job? She wasn't forced to fuck someone for your job as everyone was getting laid off from the job. She took a privilege only women are afforded in order to avoid getting laid off like everybody else.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:38 PM
1

So what i'm hearing is that a woman had the privilege to keep her job when all her coworkers were getting laid off, and took that privilege despite it meaning that she would be cheating on her husband. And somehow this is what oppression looks like?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:37 PM
1

Why the fuck should I care about women if they have never cared about me? If women don't give a shit about men and treat us as less than human why the hell should we view you as human? You should be cattle if you can't act like human beings or treat us like one. Plus in this scenario she at least was able to get something out of it a guy wouldn't have that option and would just get laid off. Holy hell that's based as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:35 PM
0

Thank you, very based. Unironically agree with all of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:35 PM
1

and many men are turned off by them when they open their mouths True about women in general bc women are fucking entitled stuck up princesses. Generally there is only one purpose for which men want their partner to open their mouth ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:31 PM
2

Women are just that bad
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 08:24 PM
2

Based if this would happen but honestly this is kinda a delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 10:13 PM
1

You keep on artisticaly dodging actual arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 11:35 PM
1

Complete non arguments because your points don't even support your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 11:26 PM
1

But you didn't prove anything... you just made shitty analogies which I explained how they did not hold and then you made complete non-arguments in typical foid style.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 11:17 PM
1

statistics-laden answers are complete crap tfw ignoring actual studies and statistics for bullshit anecdotes
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 11:08 PM
2

based
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 11:04 PM
-1

Women don't care about men's looks as much as you think we do. Our results suggest that the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness, specifically that he or she was higher than the responder on physical attractiveness, was, amongst the traits studied here, the only significant predictor of romantic interest. why do women gaslight?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 08:39 PM
3

I think there’s just a whole new standard of ugly woman has been created by the dating apps. Where God-honest ugly woman don’t even have a rating—- the unfuckables. Plain old discarded from the dating world. Say the ugly vegetables, human version 😂 For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. Being unattractive reduced the probability of mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 08:31 PM
2

But ugly men's equal don't want ugly men bc they can get hot men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:29 PM
1

Well of course INITIAL attraction is almost exclusively looks. There’s not much else to know about someone apart from that. That’s especially why online dating doesn’t work for “ugly” people. But every relationship is not built online. But INITIAL attraction is only looks both online and in real life, that's what the study shows. Therefore for ugly men no amount of personality can ever make up for looks since nobody will ever be initially attracted to them in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:21 PM
1

Laying on the bed and spreading your hole requires 1/10000th the effort of making a decent amount of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:04 PM
4

Cause less attractive girls don't want us, they are still chad only.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:01 PM
1

I would tell her that just because he's awkward doesn't mean he poses a threat to you and to stop being such a stuck up egoistic bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:00 PM
2

Ok and initial attraction is 100% looks as proved by that study. So then what are ugly guys supposed to do? They can't compensate using "personality" because looks are the only thing that gets people into a relationship initially in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:57 PM
5

just academic journals So apparently peer-reviewed sociology academic journals are bad now? And anecdotal "evidence" good?? 🤡🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:47 PM
5

I’d say it’s 70% personality for me, then 30% looks. Haha yeah I'm sure it does
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:46 PM
3

As a category, personality is home to more deal breakers than any other category. Sure it is
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:44 PM
6

This reads like a bluepiller fantasy, because it probably is. Back in reality...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:42 PM
1

based
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 10:06 PM
1

Once again you miss the point. How dense can you be?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 07:22 PM
1

But using your logic one would still conclude that killing other car drivers is justifiable... again, if you think killing a baby is self-defense cause childbirth has the possibility to kill/injure you then car accidents have similar kill/injure rates therefore it would be self-defense to kill other drivers using your logic...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 07:15 PM
1

Once again are cars growing inside your body against your will? No. Then it's a worthless comparison. How does that make it a worthless comparison? I explained how the analogy holds, think with your head not with your heart
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 06:58 PM
1

Are the cars inside your body against your will Cars smash into you against your will in a car accident. Plus having sex is a choice, pregnancy is a consequence of sex therefore pregnancy is a choice and “not against your will”. Sure, death isn’t the only pregnancy complication but death also isn’t the only car accident complication. Yes there are possible severe risks associated with pregnancy but there are possible severe risks associated with most daily mundane things, such as driving. What m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 01:55 AM
1

I'm confused. Are you under the impression that the people on the road are literally growing inside you and will rip through one of your orifices, potentially killing, disfiguring, or disabling you? No? Then that's not a valid comparison. How is the comparison not valid? Your logic was that giving birth is dangerous proven by a high maternal mortality rate, therefore killing a fetus is self-defense. By that logic, there is a similar death rate from car accidents driving on the road, so again by …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:42 PM
8

The greatest only difference between a romantic relationship and a friendship is sexual intimacy. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:15 PM
1

You're going to have to be clearer on how you think preventing women from getting abortions helps men who don't want to be fathers. I don't think it does. Sure, but self defense isn't. If I have a reasonable belief that someone is about to maim, kill me, or cause me injury, potentially grave, I can stop them, even kill them if it's a big enough threat. The USA has a shockingly high maternal death rate. I should be allowed to save myself from what could kill me. The maternal mortality rate in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 09:10 PM
1

It won't be beneficial for them, that's why they don't do it. It's beneficial for society in general If its beneficial to no constituent of society it isn't beneficial to society. All society is is a direct sum of part of its individual constituents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:09 PM
1

With that logic, your issue is with the doctors performing the abortions, not the women getting them. Condemn the doctors killing the babies, not the women passively letting it happen. Hiring a hitman is still very much illegal and immoral I wasn't talking about sex. I was talking about pregnancy. Pregnancy is a consequence of sex, which is a choice. Ergo, pregnancy is a choice. Of course it is. If you don't like women you're probably biased against them and don't have their best interest in min…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:07 PM
1

So, if you have a girlfriend or even a wife, and you found out today that you actually have ample opportunities elsewhere for casual sex (a bunch of consistent FWBs or just random hookups), would you leave your partner in order to pursue that? Yes Would you hesitate at all? No Another question I'd like to ask, is what if, instead, your girlfriend/wife told you that she now wants to be FWBs instead of romantic partners (and cease all romantic relations with you)? Would you consider that an upgrad…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:58 PM
-1

intelligent women paradox
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:55 PM
1

Holy crap. All those variables and the r-squared is less than 5% in all models. Are people really making something out of nothing? lmfao based
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:54 PM
1

Tl;dr Stop relying on "The Male Experience" to shut women up. Other male experiences can differ from yours. Women do this far more with "The Female Experience" than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:53 PM
-1

If a firm views it as beneficial they will pay maternity leave. It shouldn't be forced upon firms who don't view it as beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:51 PM
0

You can fix it. Just don't inconvenience anyone who isn't fine with being incovenienced in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:50 PM
0

A woman should absolutely have the right. No on should have to die, be torn open, body destroyed, for someone else. If I can't harvest a kidney from you when I need one to keep me alive, then no, my body can't be used as an incubator to keep someone else alive against my will. Actively killing is far different from passively letting something die. That's laughable. Especially if you think women shouldn't have access to abortions. 99.9999% of the time it is a choice to have sex with someone. Wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:50 PM
1

We could actually afford the last two things collectively if we weren't squandering those resources into safety netting stock holders when big business fucks up. And that $300bil that's spent every year on, the immoral, drug enforcement. And those $trillions spent on the military to occupy whatever land is in the interest of [big business's name here] to occupy. But why should we?? I agree all these wars including the war and drug are a complete waste but if we take away money from that (which I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 07:48 PM
-7

Biology should be accommodated when it leads to greater efficiency and benefit for the organization doing the accommodating. If there is not benefit derived for the organization doing the accommodating, I don't see anything wrong with not accommodating. Just as you women say to incels: you're not entitled to anything!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 02:42 PM
-23

Reproductive rights You don't have a right to kill a living fetus Period as a legit excuse for a sick day How is not having this a double standard by any means? Wearing your own underwear (bra that fits) in the military Boohoo, women and men are expected to conform to the same standards in the military. Ironically, doing this would actually create a double standard where there is non Paid maternity leave (parental leave is best, but if not possible at least give women a break at the end of their…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 02:29 PM
1

Ok? Risk evaluation based off of certain characteristics is always based off of conditional probabilities because you evaluate risk based off of a certain characteristic rather than the joint probability of a certain risk level and the characteristic. Black people make up a disproportionate amount of people who murder white people. Therefore, by your logic my fear of black people is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 05:31 AM
1

it still doesn't dispute the fact that if you're a white person, the race most likely to enact violence against you is other white people. Again, your are considering joint probabilities (probability of being violent + being specific race) when one needs to consider conditional probabilities (probability of being violent given specific race). How does this relate to what you're saying? Because the point is that even though this crazy cult only would hypothetically be committing 0.0001% of murder…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 05:09 AM
1

it doesn't outnumber it but it is disproportionate and that is what matters! if their was a crazy cult where 98% of the members have committed murder, even if the cult made up 0.0001% of all murder you would still avoid them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 04:24 AM
1

I used black people as an example because not many people in this sub are racist and therefore recognize racism as a bad thing. And also the amount of black on white crime is disproportionate... and again we are discussing whether holding such fear is exclusive with liking the other gender, not whether that fear is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 01:11 AM
1

Black people are actually disproportionately committing violent crimes also! And even then, the crime rate wasn’t relevant to the analogy. My point was simple - if you like something you aren’t fearful and avoidant of it. Whether or not that fearfulness that women hold of men is justified or not is a completely different discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 12:55 AM
0

What’s wrong with my analogy in this instance?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 12:37 AM
8

"Oh I am hugely fearful of black people, but I still employ them despite that! Look how much I love black people!"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 11:24 PM
16

This is a point for, not against. Being fearful and avoidant of an entire gender means you like that gender? This is your brain on bluepill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 09:45 PM
1

Based conclusion: "For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring."
/r/BlackPillScience12/01/21 04:29 AM
3

So what if it’s a cultural issue when it comes to race? The core of your argument was that “men are more likely to be dangerous, therefore it is reasonable for woman to avoid men in general”. By that logic, a black person is more likely to murder me so I should be more wary of black people than white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:02 PM
1

sigh Look dude, sure. Black people as a whole aren't respnsible for white people aside from the basic courtesy people extend to other people in social groups. I think nobody owes anything to anyone. Fair. I think black people feel attacked when white people talk about white person experience and fears, and look, I get it, nobody should get accused of being a "threat" simply for existing. I get that it feels unpleasant but sadly assaults still do happen and I think any sane white person would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 02:48 PM
3

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 04:03 AM
1

🐶💊
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:49 PM
3

Last ditch bluepill coping
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:41 AM
4

Ahh yes, calling you out for your only value makes me “triggered”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:32 AM
-4

Retarded holes appropriate funny male memes and manage to make them unfunny, and people still wonder why we say “women aren’t funny”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:24 AM
2

Even then, should simply approaching as an ugly man be considered grounds for consequences? Especially when simply more bones in your face would let you get away consequence-free?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:23 AM
0

Seethe you dumb useless hole, your still unfunny as fuck. And people still get mad when we say women aren’t funny...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:21 AM
2

red pilled incel Jfl your so out of touch with basic pill concepts that you think two diametrically opposes ideas (Redpill & blackpill /incel) can be somehow taken together. And dumb cunts still get mad when they get called out on being completely unfunny, especially compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:20 AM
3

Then how is it hateful?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:19 AM
6

And thy need to admit “attractive enough for them” is more attractive than their looksmatch
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:18 AM
5

Not simping for muh qweens is apparently hateful now, huh
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:13 AM
1

🐶💊
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:46 AM
0

Its a fucking meme ffs, nobody actually believes people are getting cucked by pitbulls.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:37 PM
1

jfl based
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:36 PM
1

Women aren't entitled to me helping them, so if I see one getting, say, mugged, i'm not gonna help her or call the cops.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:36 PM
2

Environmental terrorists exist. Should we disregard all environmental activists then and designate all of them as killers?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:31 PM
1

As I expected, I don't even agree with this post at all! Some of the 9s are 4s, some of the 2s are actually 5s. very few are - we call these 'fakecels' Elliot Rodgers. Also, they bitch about the same thing "It's women's fault I don't get laid. All women only care about looks, but it's fine when I'm super shallow". Almost no incel think its fine being shallow when they complain about others being shallow. Talk about strawman. Also one example doesn't mark the entire incel community as previously …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:28 PM
3

Imagine taking a 🐶💊 post during purge week seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:02 PM
0

Cope, men aren't brainless. We can get porn for free and blackpilled gen z will realize that these onlyfans hoes have nothing more to offer than any other type of porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:48 PM
-1

exactly, but redpill is just as bad. Raise with BLACKPILL, the only true and based pill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:47 PM
1

Show me some pictures. Because I bet it's like incels, most of them aren't ugly. And what makes you think incels aren't ugly? I got rated 1.2 on r/truerateme for example (and here is the ratings table linked in the sidebar of r/truerateme for context) Before they were incels, they were Nice Guys. They were also considered creepy misogynists. Incels and niceguys are two different groups and have effectively no overlap? Most of us weren't niceguys before being incels... So you want ugly men to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:46 PM
0

cope, your trying to desperately delude yourself that your used up cunt will still hold power in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:42 PM
2

holes don't have the mental capacity to properly respond to high iq comments like yours, which is why u/LillthOfBabylon's response was scatterbrained, completely off topic, and extremely aggressive. Holes respond with emotion, not logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:41 PM
2

blackpilled people are too physically ugly and are aware that that is the reason - the rise of this awareness is the reason why. Its a snowball effect, once incels were an established group established and coined the blackpill, more men who were far too physically ugly read about it and wake up to the truth - leading to a bigger group, more media coverage and exposure, cycle keeps on repeating. How many people heard about incels before Elliot Rodger? Almost no one - he did a terrible thing but h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:34 PM
1

cope, redpill is just as diametrically opposed to the blackpill as the bluepill is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:31 PM
3

No. Most people don't want to be around an unlikable whiny bitch. All these "blackpilled" motherfuckers are just depressed and need mental health treatments. cope. most blackpilled people are too physically ugly to get a date no matter what they do, and no amount of therapy will help that
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:29 PM
0

blackpilled based men don't simp
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:28 PM
2

Women don't give a shit about society. This is why, as I've said before, women don't build civilizations. In a woman's world, only one person exists - herself. Gigabased
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 06:28 PM
1

This reads like a copypasta
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:22 PM
4

Dis y u inkwell!!!! Forget about the fact that women are attracted to dark triad traits
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:21 PM
5

🤡🌎
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:12 PM
1

Wishing death to virgins for being virgins, classy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:11 PM
1

Over 30 incel
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:11 PM
2

Most incels, me included, would unironic agree with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:10 PM
2

Most men are always considered unattractive whether old or young, so that’s why you don’t see a shift. Young attractive men face the exact same problems as young women regarding aging.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:05 PM
2

Based. The blackpill is the way to go
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 11:03 PM
3

Jfl based
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 10:59 PM
5

I choose the sword of incelhalla, blessed by st. BlackOps2Cel himself. It has the power to cut down any Norman and IT user on hit. It’s only weakness is that it weakens the user’s eye area.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 04:35 AM
2

Ok so if you agree, then why do you say “women have high standards” is bullshit, u/imbecile_keshig ?
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 11:38 PM
3

“A bit” is an understatement. Here is the truth: looks are the most important in dating. For very physically ugly guys, it’s near impossible to get a relationship ever no matter what is done. The same cannot be said about ugly women.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 11:33 PM
2

Lmao I’m a balding 5’3” curry with a nonexistent jaw and bug eyes, nobody is more of a truecel than me. If u/Carkudo had a wife, then he was either used as BB, was a fakecel, or won the lottery.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 11:31 PM
2

You stated that hypergamy isn’t real, which is what I’m disputing. Women objectively have far higher standards for men than the other way around, u/imbecile_keshig
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 11:19 PM
2

Manosphere: here is peer reviewed studies that prove hypergamy u/imbecile_keshig: nOt tRuE jUsT cAusE i sAid sO Seriously, this entire post can be summed up with [citation needed]
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 11:03 PM
1

And now you’re arguing against points I never made. Just like not being a man whore isn’t the same as being a virgin, not being below 6ft tall isn’t the same as being “too short”. And what I argued is that women aren’t nexting guys for not being at least 6 ft tall, en masse. I stand by that. It’s not a thing that is commonly enforced in the dating market, regardless of how much it seems women desire it. Also, as an aside, the “6 ft” number is a relatively arbitrary colloquialism that’s thrown ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 08:01 PM
2

Women’s sense of attraction/sexuality is infinitely more discriminate than mens. This is not novel information, nor is it weird when you consider biological mating imperatives for the sexes. So you agree that women and mostly only women are hypergamous, or atleast women are far far more hypergamous than men Even so, these truths will not magically turn preferences into deal breakers. If one gender has stronger requirements, as we already agreed, than more of what is usually seen as "preferences"…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 07:43 PM
3

You literally had a wife lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 07:12 PM
2

I agree hypergamy exist. Don't agree that all women are, or than it's an entirely female trait. It isn't entirely a female trait and it may not be every single women, but it is very close enough to being that. If you look at the statistics, overall men date down and across while overall women date up. I disagree that a "high value man" must necessarily be more masculine or demonstrate certain behaviors. I also don't think there's a clear difference between "alphas" and "betas" since it's usually…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:40 PM
1

Once again someone misunderstanding hypergamy. Hypergamy isn't just choosing a good man, its choosing a man better than you. Hypergamy is the process of dating upwards - women do this, men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:35 PM
0

Even when accounting and correcting for this on both genders, the distribution is still skewed towards women being hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:25 PM
2

Women's standards are still far higher - hypergamy has been observed in females across the animal kingdom and modernity and society hasn't changed that a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:24 PM
3

This is my third AMA here. I did one back in 2015 as a wizard and incel in my thirties, and another one in 2017 when I'd found my first ever girlfriend who went on to become my wife and now ex-wife. Fucking fakecel smh
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter