TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ozzyo520 Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by Ozzyo520 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No you don't. No state dictates you have to carry an ID.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 11:45 PM
1

Identify yourself doesn't mean pull out your ID.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 11:44 PM
1

Because you don't have to. Why should people carry ID on them wherever they go?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 10:40 PM
1

What is the motion for sitting down?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:59 AM
0

Haha best mod comment I've ever seen.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 11:32 PM
5

But went on to emphasize you're upset you have to give money to your cheating ex. If you go to an accounting sub asking for tax advice and throw in a comment about how absurd it is you have to pay taxes for roads for bad drivers, you'll likely be told no one cares. There's no feels in these subject areas.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:53 AM
7

No one cares about your feelings, snowflake. Get over it.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:48 AM
–

Because it's legal advice. The law doesn't care about your feelings or how unfair you think it is.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:00 AM
3

This was exactly everyone's reaction that read that nonsense.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 05:46 AM
3

Ha, idk what happened. It's c/o somehow
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:25 AM
10

Disclaimer: Didn't read the article. So you don't know anything about the circumstances but you jump in to defend this man being forced to support a child that's 100℅ not his? You can't even make this shit up. The level of stupidity is astonishing. These people vote. They decide the people that write the laws, elect our judges. Hell, we even let these people drive. It's fucking mindblowing.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:07 AM
1

I'm a little confused by this response. You seem to accept that big picture studies are not accurate but then link a big picture study. And agreed, people aren't taking in the totality of the circumstances. For example, the study you originally linked noted blacks are 50% more likely to face physical force by police. But blacks aren't more likely to to commit crime because their black, they are more likely to commit crime because they're more likely to be poorer. When we account for poverty leve…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/16 06:07 PM
1

There's tons of other studies showing there is bias in police shootings of blacks. Like I said, I haven't read this study so I don't know what their criteria is. But I'm guessing you'll reject those studies as they don't reaffirm your opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/16 03:07 PM
-1

This it one source and I haven't had the chance to read the study. But there's plenty of other studies indicating otherwise. This study does find that Hispanics and blacks are 50% more likely to see force used by police than whites. But no bias by police right?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/16 05:09 AM
1

Men and women are equal. You've literally said women can't work as well as men, which is flat out retarded. YOU might not be as capable the average man but that doesn't mean the average woman isn't as capable the average man. I actually feel sorry for you. And yes, we should legislate as much equality as possible. Family courts, pay, etc etc. You'd be hard pressed to find people who legitimately agree with you. Imagine we didn't have the Civil Rights Act (which made it illegal to discriminate ba…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/16 05:41 PM
1

You'd be hard pressed to find MRA people who don't support women in the draft. I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of MRA and feminists. Both generally support equality. For example, I've always agreed with MRA's that "equal pay for equal work" is unreasonable, because women typically can't push the same productivity that a man can. They don't think this. You're wrong. A vast majority of people support equal pay and benefits. I've railed against abortion, the family court system, and…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/16 05:33 AM
1

we'll be sending the average every day woman, we'll be sending women who have always preferred to adhere to gender roles, submit to their husbands, etc. Women who never wanted any part in this madness. I have always considered myself an MRA, but now I'm having trouble understanding what you guys want. I thought you were angry because women were trying to become "more like men". I thought you were angry because you wanted ladies to be ladies, but now you're celebrating this absolutely idiotic ide…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 06:18 PM
0

We're angry because idiots like you perpetuate bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 05:18 PM
1

women could do but weren't allowed to do They couldn't do it successfully. If you think we win Normandy with half the forces being women you're out of your mind. You've also never served in the military. I'm all for women in infantry or even Ranger/SF units but the reality is, women are not as capable as men in wartime operations.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:21 AM
5

She can tell her insurance anything, insurances fight and the guy gets fucked. Police come, report is filed and there's no dispute.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/16 12:55 AM
8

Good reference when feminists argue they support equality. Perfect example of them supporting special privileges.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 05:49 AM
2

Sex is a protected class, so yes.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 02:48 AM
4

GET AN ATTORNEY. I REPEAT AND CANNOT EMPHASIZE THIS ENOUGH - GET A FUCKING ATTORNEY. NOT TOMORROW, RIGHT NOW. To be completely honest man, you've already been 10 kinds of stupid. The absolute worst thing you can do (besides seeing her again) is not get an attorney. Go to your state bars website and find one. Google them, read reviews. It you don't have money, figure it out. You're going to be fucked if you don't let an attorney handle this. IF YOU'RE STILL READING YOU DIDN'T GET AN ATTORNEY IMME…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 05:30 AM
–

Not really. In the U.S. women can have a abortions bc preventing them violates their Due Process rights bc having s child is a greater risk than having an abortion. Women. I realize this might not apply to the Danish society but it's a flawed argument for the U.S. The playing field is equal in terms of parental rights (at least in theory) but fails when spot ml apply the courts reasons for to not allow laws against abortion.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:34 AM
1

Yeah, the person advocating for keeping some dignity and out of legal trouble is a retard. Makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 11:10 AM
-12

You're a complete fucking moron and twat if you hit a chick. Like really, you're a piece of shit. You can restrain her if you're being attacked but you're a fool if you ever strike a woman.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 11:22 PM
2

Well, that's one solution.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:27 AM
–

No. No no no. Where do you bozos come up with this stuff?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:32 PM
2

Only 11 - California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:29 PM
6

Its easy to laugh, but if this data gets leaked on 37m people, as a rough measure, when you take the U.S. murder rate of 4.7/100,000 or about 1:22,500 people, and apply it to this group, all things being equal that's about 1650 people who would probably have been murdered anyway. I know that's not rigorous, given other factors, but if this list does get out, it would be a reasonable bet that at least that number of people could be murdered as a direct result of jilted spouses losing their shit. …
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 02:51 AM
2

Honestly man, you're a complete fool of you associate yourself with these people. And for what? A couple hundred bucks? Stay as far away from them as possible.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:20 AM
2

Ummm absolutely not. 1964 Civil Rights Act.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:09 AM
1

Everything
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:08 AM
–

drunk sex isn't always rape. This is you conceding the argument. How am I conceding when my argument is correct. I stated, "Often drunk sex that involves penetration is rape, again, depending on the state." False. Drunk sex is legal. Incapacitated sex is not. Drunk=/=incapacitated. There are 0 states where "drunk people can't consent to sex". If drunk sex isn't always rape, then it's only rape if some other condition is met. The condition required, as I've said repeatedly, is "Incapacitated", a …
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:51 AM
1

Sure, drunk sex isn't always rape. But drunk sex can be rape. Again, if they are drunk to the extent that he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person or property; that is rape in SC as (you have noted) the person is incapacitated. It doesn't mean they are passed out or can't control their body or can't speak, it simply means if they are drunk to where SHE LACKS UNDERSTANDING OR CAPACITY TO MAKE RESPONSIBLE DECISIONS, that is ra…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:42 AM
–

Yes and I already provided SC legal definition of incapacitated but apparently you refuse to accept it. to the extent that he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person or property; It's quite clear from that you can be prosecuted for having sex with a drunk person. Lacks capacity to make responsible decisions
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:04 AM
–

Unconscious or very close to it, to the point of being incapable of communication and bodily control. This is absolutely not correct and an incredible interpretation of the legal definitions, both SC and elsewhere. Here's some more reading as there's too much to cite.... http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-having-sex-with-someone-who-is-drunk-considered-1238342.html
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:15 AM
1

Correct. The incapacitation standard is universal in this country, and the UK. As per that definition, it is routinely upheld in case precedent to mean Unconscious or very close to it, to the point of being incapable of communication and bodily control. It does not mean "drunk". Unless you think all drunk people are incapable of communicating. to the extent that he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person or property; lacks suf…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:02 AM
–

SECTION 62-5-101. Definitions and use of terms. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, in this Code: (1) "Incapacitated person" means any person who is impaired by reason of mental illness, mental deficiency, physical illness or disability, advanced age, chronic use of drugs, chronic intoxication, or other cause (except minority) to the extent that he lacks sufficient understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning his person or property; http://www.scstate…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:36 PM
–

There are 0 states where "drunk people can't consent to sex". This is absolutely false. Most states drunk cannot give consent. I don't feel like looking it up but here's a quick google results. http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/can-an-intoxicated-person-give-consent-to-sexual-a-77330.html In most states a drunken woman is unable to give consent and therefore a male partner can be charged with assault. In most states the defense that the woman actively participated in the sexual activity, even en…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:23 PM
–

https://www.stsm.org/south-carolina-laws-regarding-sexual-assault-and-consent Consent cannot legally be given by someone who is intoxicated. A person can also receive up to 30 years in prison for sexually assaulting the victim after giving him or her a controlled or intoxicating substance, such as alcohol or a “date rape” drug.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:21 PM
–

Nope, depending on state. That's why this poster is correct, it's only educating based on the law. Often drunk sex that involves penetration is rape, again, depending on the state.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:16 PM
–

Yes, the law usually requires penetration.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:28 PM
–

Yes it is. It was discussed in another thread. Typically (depending on the state), the law uses terminology like penetration to determine rape. Hence, this poster isn't the enemy, as it's just educating the laws, the laws are the real problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:27 PM
2

Wut
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:42 PM
1

So since there's legal precedent that a husband can rape his wife, does this mean a husband and wife cannot have sex if she's intoxicated? Once married men find out about this all hell will break loose.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:40 PM
–

HOW IS IT NOT DETERMINED SHE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED HIM????? She admitted to giving him a blowjob while he was blacked out. Let's flip it. Male gives oral to blacked out female. Who sexually assaulted who? What the fuck?????
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:31 PM
2

Do not talk about it. Do not admit to anything to anyone. You need a good criminal defense attorney. You cannot talk your way out of this out convince people of anything. What you can do is incriminate yourself and be totally fucked. Don't say another word about this and get an attorney. Edit: this should be clear op: sex with someone that is intoxicated (she says she was blackout drunk) is rape. Legally, she cannot consent while drunk. In the eyes of many people, and probably legally, you have …
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:04 PM
11

Yeah but will she face charges for those eyebrows?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:11 PM
6

Dude, hang in there. There's nothing wrong with feeling overwhelmed but you will pull yourself through. Doesn't work for everyone but I find a lot of strength in running. I'm about to go for a run and I will find the strength to power through it and suddenly realize I can handle life's issues. Find your escape, figure out something that works for you. You're not alone, if you need someone to vent to PM me. Everyone has a struggle. Hang in there, one day you'll be glad you did....
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:31 PM
1

No its actually an expression. People say it all the time. I'm sorry you don't have social skills and can't understand that.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:56 PM
–

It's an expression, learn some social skills.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:16 PM
–

Haha, I was 05. Yeah I went there on Easter
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:19 PM
–

Wait, were you on Tallil?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:50 AM
–

Huh? Women were doing the same thing as the men
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:32 PM
–

He was mid 30s too, should have known better. Nothing came of it though. Women make you do crazy things sometimes...
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:22 PM
–

He pulled the receiver back (magazine was always inserted except when eating) so that a round was now in the chamber and it was ready to fire. Think of it as cocking a gun as if you're about to use it.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:48 PM
–

I'm all about equality but women and the military is a different animal. My roommate and I, while deployed, had to restrain a guy who just chambered a round at 3 a.m. when he realized his girlfriend, or whatever you call a deployment fuck buddy, was fucking another dude. Was during the OSU/Texas game, remember it like it was yesterday.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:26 PM
2

Get a full picture people... This is the standard with every college advisor I have ever dealt with. They are completely worthless.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:05 PM
5

Bingo!
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:53 PM
1

That makes sense. I have been searching and meaning to post on/r/legaladvice /r/law. Thanks
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:52 PM
1

I said that a little tongue in cheek. But yeah, obviously you would need to make a stink about it, then cancel and be hit with lots of fees, then sue for millions ;) Curiously, your link brings up a question I've been meaning to ask one of the legal subs, not sure if you can answer it. According to that you need to let the infringer know they're infringing on your rights? Is that correct? So if an employer states 'only hiring Muslims' do you need to tell them, 'you can't do that'. Seems like rui…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:05 PM
7

Cancel and sue. Slam dunk
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:38 PM
3

And this folks it's why I'm not getting married...
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:45 PM
0

I think you're full of shit in general
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:25 PM
1

As a member of the legal profession, I am required to state caveats that I am not forming legal relationships whenever I talk about the law, in any format. I think you're full of shit
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:52 PM
0

the identity of the touching party. And this can be construed in a number of different ways, and it's dumb. So I don't have the option to anonymously go out one night and sleep with someone? I can't tell a girl my name is Bob when it's really Fred? If the consenting party finds any details that imperative it's their duty to verify them. Your hurt feelings don't constitute crimes and heading down that road is ridiculous. Also, you don't need to put a disclaimer at the bottom of your posts. This i…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:02 PM
1

You're the one who hasn't actually thought this through. Deception doesn't equal rape. You're argument means that telling a woman I met at the bar I'm a doctor and her having sex with me is rape. What about when immediately before sex the woman tells me she's not on her period, but afterwards it's clearly obvious she is, we've just had sex under false pretenses - did she rape me? What about when a woman asks if I love her and I reply yes, we then have sex, but I later confess I never loved her. …
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:22 PM
0

Where did it say that in the article?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter