TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

P4-FSH Archive

View 1 post and 15 comments by P4-FSH on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

P4-FSH/r/MensRights22/02/11 06:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

"Most" is a bit over the top, no?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:28 PM
17

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Capitalization#Titles
/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:29 PM
2

Never stoop down to the level of surly assholes. Take the high road.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:14 PM
1

In case you were wondering my username is the offshore registration number of televangelist Ernest Angley's private Boeing 747SP jumbo jet. Last I heard on airliners.net he's got it in Smyrna, TN for the winter.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:03 PM
6

I concur. Charlie Sheen might indeed be an abusive jerk but it pains me to think that there are any women familiar with him that don't see the way he treats his lovers, girlfriends, and wives. Neither men nor women should date or marry abusive jerks.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 04:58 AM
2

I haven't any numbers either, but I think that the "free love" eras only included a select few who bought into the appropriate scene and ideology. Was it shameful, in general, for an unwed couple to cohabitate in 1970 in the US? Is it more or less shameful now? Seems like the answer is less, but I'd love to be disproven with real facts to displace my unscientific speculation.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 12:57 AM
3

Since sex is easier for men to acquire than ever before in modern times, the author is right. The women are the sexual arbiters. If women as a collective would deny men fitting the discussed description many men would change their ways. However, not all men are so obsessed with sexual gratification that they'd overhaul their, presumably, enjoyable lives in order to "hook up" more. As a man who roughly meets the description I wouldn't do a thing to radically change my preferred lifestyle to attra…
/r/MensRights26/02/11 09:10 PM
1

Indeed! I'm not interested in Leave it to Beaver suburban bliss. I think I've assembled, from scratch, a nice life for myself. If somebody wants to share in that nice life I'd be happy to share. I'm just not willing to bend to someone else's desires if they're diametrically opposed to my own.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:47 PM
2

I think you're quite right if you think of the "stuff" that's wanted as a family and kids and all the associated niceties. It takes two to tango so if no available men want those things the lady who seeks them is out of luck.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:43 PM

I agree with your assessment. I could reclassify myself not as a lazy man-child, but as a good guy, a potential nice catch, who is not interested in being caught. A man, or woman for that matter, who is devoid of ambition and refuses to accept responsibility for himself or herself would be an unattractive potential mate. Don't date lazy slobs if you don't like lazy slobbish behavior. Move on in search of someone whose goals are compatible with your goals.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 12:00 AM

I'm getting downvotes so I'll try to clarify. Imagine you meet a woman you might like to date. Early on she says one of her life goals is to watch a game in every professional baseball stadium. She asks you to accompany her on her summer-long adventure. You don't like baseball and you don't want to spend months on the road. You decline. If the trip is so important that this difference of interests is a deal-breaker why would she get upset about it? She, IMO should move on and find someone who sh…
/r/MensRights22/02/11 11:41 PM

Methinks that people in your situation are out of the scope of the author's argument. You're a student. Your studies take all of your time and energy as you prepare to graduate, enter the working world in a good situation, and achieve longer-term goals. Nobody should reasonably expect to stand between you and graduation. Women and children are likely low on your list of priorities in life. I think the author is talking about men who are out of school and self-supporting who do not wish to share …
/r/MensRights22/02/11 11:00 PM

This is an excellent analysis. What's the problem though. I don't care if somebody I don't know whose opinion has no effect on me thinks I'm a crime-fighting irresponsible man-child. If I observed a woman living the same sort of independent life as me I'd certainly not think that her actions were detrimental to me. She's doing her own thing and my opinion of that has no bearing on her. I'm not harmed. The original WSJ article seems to suggest that women are harmed by men behaving selfishly. Am I…
/r/MensRights22/02/11 08:52 PM

So is the problem is related to a general fear for the future of society? Something along the lines of "if men everywhere decide that they don't need what we women have to offer we'll live in a land with no new citizens and frustration for those of us women who do want to grant unto a man our support and other beneficial things."
/r/MensRights22/02/11 08:46 PM

My cuddly-yet-scary-looking German Shepherd is too big to qualify as a small dog. :-P
/r/MensRights22/02/11 08:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter