TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PIV_OR_GTFO Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by PIV_OR_GTFO on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You're acting as though this woman's body was there for you to look at. He's acting that way because her body really was there, and it would be impossible not to notice.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 07:39 PM
1

More insults and condescension. Anything else? Or have I really touched a nerve? It's not tearing you down to share how I think a lot of people would react to you. Maybe that's an incorrect assessment, but you jumped straight to thinking it was a personal insult or jealousy, throwing in some "I bet you're low class" playground insults. So defensive over mere observation. It's actually a little endearing to see the vulnerability come through in your posts.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 07:22 PM
1

Actually, people have committed murder and not gone to jail. Ever heard of battered woman syndrome? Also, "go to jail" is not equal across all cases. First degree murder, 25 to life? Or 4.5 years plus probation for third degree? You completely missed the point once again. There are gradations of crimes, hence your statements "abuse is abuse" and "you still go to jail in both cases" are incorrect and pretty stupid to even contemplate. Let me try again: you said "abuse is abuse" when it comes to s…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 07:16 PM
0

That is correct, but it's completely beside the point I was making. There are gradations of abuse, just like for every other crime. To state that "abuse is abuse" and imply she might provoke suicide from letting this guy live the teenage dream is absurd to the utmost degree.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 01:34 AM
1

Yeah, banging hot women is totes abuse, but the minute you turn 18 it's no longer abuse. The legal distinctions are arbitrary given our biology. I would like to think that TRP would understand that better than most. "Abuse is abuse" that's one of the dumbest statements a human being could possibly make. How is a guy going after a hot teacher on the same level as other forms of "abuse"? After all, you said it's all the same. For example: "Murder is murder" actually, not at all. If you coldly calc…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 01:16 AM
84

Putin knows that his comments will receive attention and ignite a firestorm - to his advantage, no less. This is a good example of an interesting alpha tactic: say something that is true that you know will provoke others, but don't state it in an over the top way. This causes hamster overdrive - women will start trying to decipher you, thinking about each and every comment you make. "Women love assholes" really means they love a guy who is not afraid to rock the boat if he has courage of his con…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 01:05 AM
1

Interesting that I "probably wouldn't be welcome," despite owning suits and dressier clothing and looking clean cut, but this girl was welcomed in her sweatpants or whatever you said she was wearing. Again, it just feels like you're making assumptions that I am, in your words, a punk 20 year old with no money. I suspect you probably feel I made similar unwarranted assumptions of you, but your lengthy post clarified a lot. Unfortunately we have to assume things until we get such a large amount of…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 12:55 AM
1

It's not tearing you down to point out how most people react to a guy in a bar in a suit. Oh well, guess I'm just not part of your "class." By the way, your four paragraphs of handwringing failed to address my central criticism: the image you're projecting (to me: vain and pretentious, to you: "classy") creates an expectation that you will spend money on women. This is a problem in the presence of AF/BB. I suspect you didn't address this because you are guilty of spending stupid amounts of money…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 09:21 AM
2

...until your realize that the "apple" in this case is impregnating a female - and only ONE man can do that. Men are naturally protective of their mates - it's been hammered into us by evolution. In that context, the apple analogy holds up quite well from the male sexual perspective.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 03:54 AM
1

You're right it sets up expectations, but not the ones you're picturing. Dude... you are in a suit in most of your pictures? Can you not see how incredibly try-hard that is? Imagine how people who are actually wealthy/classy act. They do not flaunt it that brazenly. Here's one expectation your "high fashion" sets: she will expect you to spend money on her. After all, if you're literally wearing $1000+ in your Tinder pictures, why shouldn't you spend money on her? Regarding the pre-meeting chatte…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 03:33 AM
3

Poe's law in action, but if you're being sarcastic... Reductio ad absurdum. Pocket squares are ridiculous --> oh so you wear a wife beater and torn jeans? Makes absolutely no sense, sounds like something a woman blurts out when she's upset. You can dress nicely without wearing a pocket square and polished shoes when you're getting a drink with a girl from a casual dating app. Extremely pretentious and try hard in my book.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 11:38 PM
0

Again, just a "could be worse" fallacious argument. Almost ANY activity could be construed as, "it's not as bad as the guy with a terrible diet, sleep schedule, and exercise habits." That's a completely spurious example to inject into the conversation. Seems like a lot of qualifications for when it would be safe/appropriate to juice. Pretty easy to see how things could go wrong - as they commonly do for many who attempt it. If you can so it safely congrats, doesn't mean the average guy has any b…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 11:34 PM
1

That's not anything close to my line of reasoning. It's widely known that people will overdo the details when they're lying. I don't think every post is a troll, but they do occur. And even if a post is real, it's filtered through one person's interpretation and ability to communicate - again filtered through your interpretation. We can have some healthy skepticism without saying "fake, nothing to be learned here." There's still things to learn from that post regardless of if it's fake.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 11:30 PM
0

It's not a straw man, it's no true Scotsman. Logical fallacies: learn them.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 11:25 PM
15

This is an extreme case with a really dumb girl and a situation where you actually witness a girl get DT'd. Most guys will not actually get to witness the dark triad conjure tingles - the women (as well as the DTs) will be much more cunning and discrete about it in more common cases. I'm wondering if any particular 'tells' exists that indicate a girl is more/less susceptible to dark triads. AWALT
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 12:59 AM
-1

I for one appreciate your perspective and humor on this topic. He really sends the message of scarcity mentality beta bux. If I saw this guy walk into a bar the first thing I would think is "try-hard beta bux." Lmao at the pocket square comment. Seriously, pocket squares? WTF?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:55 PM
1

Yeah, it's not like it was Valentine's Day or anything, women are widely known to overdo it on that night!
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:42 PM
6

I like how they say that black men "on par" with her are rare, thus these guys milk the fact that they have many options. If you can't land someone romantically, they're probably not on par with you. Females apply some esoteric, non-romantic standard to figure out who is "on par" with them. "We both have graduate degrees, I guess we're on the same level!"
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:35 PM
15

B-b-b-but that's rrrrracist!!!11!!!1!!!
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:30 PM
0

I also think it's fake, for an additional reason. Includes too many details. For example, instead of just saying he's drinking whiskey in his hotel room, he specifies that he picked it up on the way to the hotel. There are other examples of "too much" detail in there that an emotionally devastated person would most likely skip over. The relationship threads that require a bunch of clarification are the most likely to be true. But if someone is concocting a story they can view it critically and e…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:06 PM
1

Ahh the old "it could be worse" logical fallacy. His question was merely: is the risk of permanent damage worth some transitory pussy? You seem to think so, but others may disagree.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 07:54 PM
4

He asked it it was worth it for the pussy and you got defensive. Seems like you realize it might not be a good idea to roid it up.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 07:40 PM
1

Oh yeah? Well you're a big poopyhead! There, now we're conversing on the same level.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 07:26 PM
2

The topic of this thread was AFBB. How is it degrading to women to observe that it's fairly common for women to marry men for money? Fear of intimacy... What? I don't know how you would conclude that based on a set of observations about how women interact with men. It is true that a lot of new RPers feel bitter initially. The bitterness is from the realization that everything they've ever been told about wooing women is false: be a nice guy, always ask women for permission for everything, never …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:42 PM
3

Shut the fuck up with the tone policing. Ironically, you're committing the same mistake that you accuse TRP of making - namely, taking one example and ascribing that to the entire group. A "community" can not have an opinion; individuals have opinions. I literally laughed out loud at how stupid that thread about women voting was. Are you starting to understand how people have contrasting opinions on this sub? EDIT: I can't count how many times I've heard women crow about how if women ran the wor…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:06 PM
2

Actually, you did say I hated women. I'm glad I walked you back from that. You should think through the logical consequences of your statements before you blurt out the first piece of emotional bullshit that crosses your consciousness. I don't "belong" to TRP. It's a forum for discussion, not a religious organization. All humans are irrational (exhibit A: your posts). We acknowledge this and explore how women rationalize their behavior in pursuit of their own sexual strategy. What about that mak…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 06:54 PM
4

Thanks, I needed a good laugh. You're a riot! (Notice the proper use of you're/your. You need to experience the real world and realize how to use proper grammar.) So you give people the benefit of the doubt, but you declare that I hate women. Your (again note the proper usage) insights have been truly remarkable thus far, so please educate me. How do I hate women, exactly? The average woman is no "worse" than the average man... Worse with respect to what variables? Definitely not physical streng…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 05:21 PM
1

Should have written "even if the father is a shitbag..." My point was that whether or not he is a jerk doesn't have any bearing on the inappropriate nature of telling a pregnant teen about your abortion.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 03:40 PM
3

It's funny you bring up "trust." Trust is itself an instinct. We are all operating on instinct you fucking moron.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 03:38 PM
4

"Huh, it's midnight and this black guy has been walking behind me for a few blocks now. Oh well, even though criminals are disproportionately black and Hispanic, I shouldn't make any assumptions. After all, Youngswizzle told me that would be racist." "Please don't hurt me, here take my wallet!" "Phew. Glad I'm OK. At least I can go to bed tonight with the warm glow of knowing I didn't make any racist assumptions!" You can operate under a strategy for success while still acknowledging that there …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 03:36 PM
3

This sub gets shit on every week in a major thread. You would have found it anyways.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 03:13 PM
3

*people's *their I don't care about what people think of the sub. I care about not getting this sub shut down, and the best way to do that is to not leave it open to interpretation. If he had just posted here, we would simply be casual observers - not active participants in the thread in question. You should try using big boy language instead of "fag" for people you disagree with. Then again, you're having trouble with basic spelling and grammar, so I guess "fag" is just par for the course with …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 03:12 PM
8

Classic BP deflection. Generalized comment about women, supported by the broad experience of men --> NAWALT Your comment is like when a study comes out about smoking and cancer, some dipshit invariably says, "But my grandma smoked and live until she was 98!" Fuck your exceptions. AWALT is a valid operating principle, even if it is not a valid principle in 100% of all cases.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 01:23 AM
1

Fucking tone police. Good riddance.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 01:00 AM
1

You're still failing to even acknowledge my point that there's no reason to assume rape will benefit your genes. I gave a very plausible description of how widespread rape could negatively impact your own genes' fitness. But no, you're still focused on individual humans - you're failing to consider the genes you share with other people, who could be negatively impacted by rape. Even just looking at an individual male (since you're apparently unable to think about genes as superceding individuals…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 11:59 PM
2

Sexual selection is a term typically used to describe run-away arms races such as peacock feathers or the size of human brains. You're using it in a slightly different way, but I'll continue to use it in the way you've been. Being attracted to the strongest male is sexual selection. What does the word "attraction" imply? Sexual desire It's clear you didn't read or didn't understand one of my earlier points. You're asking about the rapist's offspring - this is too narrow a focus in terms of evolu…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 11:02 PM
2

That wasn't my point. My point was equilibria are reached in social systems - a significant minority cheat the system, but the system does not collapse because it remains beneficial to fitness. Exploiting altruism and rape are just two examples of this. And your statement about evolution being all about exploitation betrays a certain ignorance on the topic of evolution. Most evolutionarily beneficial behaviors involve cooperation.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:56 PM
4

Slow clap
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:53 PM
2

Rape is not an argument against sexual selection. It's an example of people cheating an established social norm, like those who exploit the altruism of others. The fact that some people take advantage of the generosity of others is not an argument against altruism being evolutionarily beneficial. Every male has female relatives (and possibly children) that share the male's genes. Thus he has an interest in their reproductive success. Most likely, the female relatives' reproductive success would …
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:35 PM
4

There's a lot of research out there about how female preferences fluctuate throughout the menstrual cycle. The best attempt at hamstering this away that I have heard is as follow: "We don't want to sleep with different guys throughout the month, we just want our man to behave differently at different times!" Doesn't hold up to scrutiny, but I was mildly impressed with her attempt at reasoning instead of just blurting out "PATRIARCHY!"
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 08:06 PM
12

I wouldn't consider myself right-wing at all, but this website definitely proves this maxim to be true: "Conservatives think liberals have bad ideas. Liberals think conservatives are bad people."
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:53 PM
0

she made the right choice, she aborted. She made the right choice after making a series of horribly incorrect choices. Chose to illegally drink alone with a man, did not choose to take plan B after intercourse. I agree her father said some fucked up things. That being said, she really DID kill his grandchild - you can't work around that one. The father being a shitbag has nothing to do with whether she should be spouting off to a teen about abortion. Much in the same way this woman's eyes would …
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:47 PM
10

I don't think the point of this thread is that TRP thinks people shouldn't get abortions. The point is she gets extremely butt hurt that other people disagree with her advice, and disagree that she should even be talking casually to a child about how she got an abortion too. She thinks her opinions are immune to criticism simply because the topic is her choice to have an abortion.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:41 PM
58

I think it's a disservice to this sub to comment in that thread, and then post a new thread on TRP under the same username. I think we should be doing everything in our power to avoid getting this sub shut down. That means leaving no room for interpretation regarding "brigading." It's funny to think about how she would react if someone had suggested this teen keep the baby. NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS SHITLORD! Yet she expects to receive no criticism when she shares her "experiences." People were sugg…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 06:34 PM
2

Dude, you are three years in with no complications such as children. Why wouldn't you divorce now? It sounds doomed to fail no matter what you do. Now is the easiest time to get out.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:54 AM
4

One way you could attempt to work around this is to occasionally say how much you love that she does X in such a Y way. If she complains you can always refer to these instances. Depending on the girl, you might have to use the occasional "I love you," but as another poster said just go Han Solo the rest of the time: "I know"
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:51 AM
2

I agree on your meta analysis. I also agree that GLO may have lost frame, maybe not - none of us can know just from reading some text. That's precisely my point: your responses to shit tests are open for interpretation, thus the only way to guarantee that you do not fail a shit test is to not address it. GLO's responses directly address her comments and concerns - a fool's errand.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 09:47 PM
-1

Actually, GLO pretty much begged her to stay. "You'll ruin your BJ permanent record" = taunting her, reminding her of her sexual past, and can easily be interpreted as "don't leave." SHIT TEST FAILED "My next booty call will take 45min to get here" = again taunting her, and GLO uses an aggressive form of abundance mentality that can easily backfire or even come across as vindictive. The proper use of abundance mentality is to imply you have options, NOT to rub it in her face in such a childish w…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 08:11 PM
1

Even if this is true, that's not a knock-down argument proving MrDaddy wrong. The fact that being a whiny, outcome dependent, frame-submitting beta happened to work out for GLO with this one girl says nothing about the broad effectiveness of what he did, namely: Actually addressing her comments and concerns In GLO's own words, "shit talking" her. There is a fine line between being cheeky and being insulting, the latter showing outcome dependence. The only foolproof way to display outcome indepen…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 07:09 PM
6

If you ignore her, she is not rewarded with attention. She will most likely not repeat something that doesn't work as desired. If she can't catch a clue, as other poster said, you can tell her to knock it off. But you seem to be suggesting you should tell her off the first time she tries it. This is submitting to her conversational frame, and it comes across as defensive and shows you are outcome dependent.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:58 PM
8

Exactly. Too bad the GLO fan boys buried your comment. His reply to you was just re-affirming your strategy... I too am getting extremely tired of reading stories of GLO failing shit tests left and right by being a whiny little bitch, hurling insults, showing extreme outcome dependence, etc. He gets a lot of positive responses by throwing in crass humor, unfiltered misogyny, and other red meat for his cadre of thirsty neckbeards fantasizing about telling women off, all of which obscures the fact…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:29 PM
6

Right, and your "style" largely consists of being whiny and submitting to her conversational frame, instead of completely dismissing the topic. You actually address her comments instead of brushing them off. There's almost never a true need to "shit talk" a woman. You can dominate them without being insulting. It's called being playful and aloof - it's harder to pull off but much more effective than "shit talking." When you do that, the woman interprets that she's touched a nerve and gotten to y…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:18 PM
4

First of all, you don't use phrases like "get out," you use power talk or dismissive/aloof speech. "Get out" is just butt hurt. You are making the naive assumption that she actually will leave when you tell her to get out. If you have ever attempted this you would know they almost never leave; they stay and finish the job. Alternatively if she really does leave, you're right that she will be wondering "wtf happened, I thought he was into me?" This is EXACTLY the type of thought process that will…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter