TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PJackson6 Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by PJackson6 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'd like to see non-discretionary spending such as on food, children's clothing etc. taken out of the equation so we can see how much discretionary spending e.g. on non-work clothing, jewellery, SHOES, perfume etc is spent on women vs. men. I'm willing to bet that a lot more is spent on women.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 01:31 AM
3

The 2% figure is an often repeated lie by feminists. It comes from Susan Brownmiller's book 'Against Our Will' and is not based on any evidence whatsoever. The lowest figure from a reputable study is 8% from a study by the FBI but other studies have put the figure at over 40% and even as high as 80%. False accusations of rape and sexual assault are common.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:20 AM
6

Happy hunting ground
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:03 AM
2

Quite right too. I also wouldn't intervene if I were to see children playing on a level crossing or some other dangerous place. Why run the risk of a false accusation?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:15 AM
20

Pure projection. Most men don't give a shit how women flick their beans, but women seem to get into a fury over the idea of men replacing them with sex dolls or porn.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:13 PM
6

Now that she has nothing to lose, she is free to give her man-hatred free rein.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:01 PM
11

So when you point out the petty vindictive carping of feminists, about something as trivial as a man sitting comfortably with his legs apart and somebody shoots back that it's just the extreme feminists who do this; you can now point them to this idiot, who was actually running for President and yet thinks this way.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:53 PM
7

The man-flu myth is typical projection by women painting men as neurotic and hypochondriacs, when a far greater proportion of women could in fact be described as such. Just look at the women's section of any newspaper. It will be full of articles about PMS, menopause and a whole range of other wimminz ailments. Here's a link to a newspaper article about how women take 42% more sick leave than men. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/10660612/Women-are-almost-42-per-cent-more-likely-to-take-si…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 07:00 AM
1

This is the reason I never donate to CRUK. This is the charity which has the 'Race for Life' fund raising run, which is only open to women.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:53 AM
3

Just when I thought that my opinion of Jess Phillips couldn't get any lower.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:29 PM
6

I agree with the other posters who say that the arguments against male contraception are BS. Those against say: 1.The male contraceptive would only appeal to men in long-term relationships. On the contrary, men who have lots of casual partners would be highly motivated to avoid an accidental pregnancy or deliberate entrapment. 2.Getting women to stop taking their pill would be difficult. That's not necessary. Women can continue to take their pill, reducing the risk of accidental pregnancy still …
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:12 AM
1

The current women's world record in the marathon is 2 hours 17 minutes and that for the men is 2 hours 3 minutes and women have officially been running in marathons for at least 90 years. So when can we expect women's 'innate superiority' in stamina to translate into better times than men?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 02:50 PM
3

So she's claiming that he was breathing down her neck in the debates. Given that it's well publicized that she has a body odour problem and smells of a combination of boiled cabbage, urine and farts, I really can't imagine that Trump would want to breathe anywhere near her. She was the one who was continually invading his personal space in the debates.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 08:42 AM
6

Seems to me that she already holds a PhD in advanced cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 08:55 PM
2

I know that this is not what you mean but your post is poorly worded and makes it seem that you are calling Erin Pizzey and Christina Hoff-Sommers man haters. They are of course highly critical of the man hating aspect of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:41 PM
2

I wonder how it would have gone down if Garry Richardson had said something like 'Calm down love, are you feeling a bit premenstrual today?' My guess is that it would have been the end of his career with the BBC.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 11:25 AM
1

Just because the the ones who are disappointed don't comment, doesn't mean that everyone is happy. By definition he's no longer going to be covering many of the issues which brought a lot of his subscribers to AvFM in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:47 PM
1

PD-dar? I think that he's a bit of a narcissist but not a sociopath.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:27 PM
1

Yes he deserves kudos for raising awareness but he could not have done it without his subscribers. Now just when the issues are getting mainstream awareness, he decides unilaterally to change focus. It makes no sense and I'm sure a lot of his subscribers will be pissed off.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:20 PM
1

Really? That was the plan was it? To ditch raising issues like alienation of fathers from their families after divorce, male victims of domestic violence, victims of paternity fraud, etc. etc. Maybe Elam should have consulted with his subscribers, instead of just making that decision to change tack, but then he has always struck me as an autocrat. My guess is that his new venture will sink without a trace.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:54 PM
1

I suspect that many of Elam's subscribers will feel let down that, following the impact of The Red Pill movie, he isn't striking while the iron is hot and redoubling his efforts to support the full range of men's rights issues, but instead narrowing his focus on a single aspect of them. Hopefully someone who is more politically astute will step in to take things further.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:19 PM
2

That's changing tack not tact. With increased awareness of men's issues, thanks in no small part to AvFM, the next stage has to be political activism and it has become increasingly clear that AvFM was unwilling or unable to make that step. The site has in recent years begun to look like nothing more than a talking shop. Hopefully a new group will be able to build on their groundwork and begin with serious lobbying and political activism.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:48 PM
1

You can bet that if there's any chance of actual combat, that the girlies will be in the rear with the gear.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:01 PM
2

Complainant not victim!
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:29 PM
1

The US incarcerates a greater percentage of its population than any other major country in the world by a wide margin.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:56 PM
2

Vote with your wallet and don't go there. If they keep charging women less they'll soon go out of business.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:35 AM
2

Far too lenient
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:23 AM
12

Yes and they have fewer cells in the cerebral cortex the area of the brain associated with reason
/r/MensRights01/08/17 01:38 AM
4

You should threaten them with legal action. What you described is slander.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:17 AM
6

If this is by a man, the the old adage 'You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink' would seem to apply. If it's by a feminist woman pretending to be a man, it wouldn't be the first time. Look up Meg Lanker-Simons who sent facebook rape threats to herself under a male alias, so she could play the victim.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 05:16 PM
2

No LeSwedenBall is exactly right, if you believe in letting the market decide pay, which is what a free market economy is all about, then female models SHOULD be paid more than male models. If the female fashion market is worth 10 times that of the male market and the top models in each bring in an extra 1% market share then the female model will bring in 10 times the additional revenue that the male model does and should be paid accordingly. It's only relevant to the Pay Gap argument in that it…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:46 AM
1

Corbyn is stuck in the 1950s and still believes in the discredited Economics of Communism.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:40 AM
1

I think that the higher pay of female models is justified because they bring in more revenue due to the fact that more money is spent on women's clothes than on men's clothes. Men's and women's fashion are separate industries. The men are not being paid less because they are men but because they are advertising in a less lucrative market. This illustrates the fact that market forces, not sex discrimination, lead to different outcomes for men and women
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:38 AM
12

It's evidence that helps to illustrate that people are paid based on the value which they bring to a business, not on their sex. I think that conclusive proof against the existence of a pay gap due to sex discrimination still requires evidence from a broader sample of the working population, which shows that the gap is due to hours worked, different career choices etc.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:51 AM
9

Unfit mother
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:01 AM
1

Wow! Who would have thunk it? Next they'll be telling us that the Pope is a Catholic
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:53 PM
8

This is going to haunt Logan Huysman for the rest of her life
/r/MensRights09/07/17 05:12 PM
5

Yes. It's a clear indication that female police officers are not being exposed to the same level of risk as male police officers. Yet they demand the same pay and promotion prospects.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:37 AM
12

Quote: 'It isn't anyone's place to say anything about what people CHOOSE TO DO WITH THEIR CHILDREN'. Fucking hell this makes by blood boil!!!! Your children are not your fucking property you cunt, they are independent human beings, for whom you have a responsibility to raise to be adults who are healthy in mind and body. If you CHOOSE to do something which will harm them mentally or physically, it's my PLACE and society's PLACE to stop you. Don't you wish that just once, you had the ability to r…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:38 PM
6

Yes the usual mantra. False allegations are rare- lie. It's women who are the victims of false allegations because it 'undermines their credibility' -lie.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:33 AM
15

Will women be providing the security too? You want to exclude men, fine, then fend for yourselves. Let's see how you fare when a horde of immigrants gatecrashes your festival.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:29 AM
13

Look at how everyone in the comments under the article is trying to excuse it as mental illness. How about just damned evil
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:23 AM
1

It's the champagne of victory!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:48 PM
64

Yes the classic use of the passive voice to dodge personal responsibility. The only thing that she's really sorry about is that she got caught.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:46 PM
5

..and now the object of her affection knows that not only is she the sort of skank who will indulge in group sex in a lavatory, but she's a sociopath who would consign two innocent men to decades in prison just to curry sympathy for herself. Who wouldn't want to take her home to meet mother?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:56 PM
2

@ Angela Saini That's right dear and height is only one measure of the distance between the top of your head and the ground. Don't fret!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:44 PM
2

High emotional IQ means that you're more emotional, in other words more prone to tantrums.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:40 PM
2

Ha Ha! The femtards will have conniptions!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:39 PM
1

If you don't think that feminist organisations like WEP are antagonistic towards men's rights, you have a lot to learn. Damn right we should be bashing them.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:13 PM
147

They think that it's a victory but they have once again shot themselves in the foot, by proving themselves to be anti free speech bigots, just as they did with their attempts to block screenings of The Red Pill documentary.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:08 PM
1

Who cares? If women want to eat themselves into an early grave it will probably be good for the economy. At present their net contribution is negative on average, because of the cost of keeping them alive in their 80s and 90s.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:20 PM
4

Another Hollywood shit for brains (Scarlett Johansson) spouting drivel.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:10 AM
5

It's a men's rights issue because she's paid the same for playing less tennis at an inferior level. Women should have their own entirely separate tournaments instead of leeching off the men. They bring in about 1/3 the ticket sales and 1/3 of TV revenue that men do yet expect the same money. That's like a saleswoman who brings in $3m per year expecting to be paid the same as a salesman who brings in $9m per year.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:00 AM
11

Pushing a 5'0" 120 lb woman into becoming a firefighter is a potential threat to people's lives
/r/MensRights25/06/17 04:47 AM
1

Nope if you knew anything about Muslim society you would know that this is par for the course for many wealthy Muslim women, especially in Saudi Arabia. They have servants, often from India, and they treat them appallingly.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 10:25 PM
5

Except that we are forever hearing about how Muslim women are oppressed, yet here we see such women literally enslaving others. So they are obviously not all the poor oppressed innocents that they're portrayed to be.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:03 PM
1

He was definitely in the wrong here. Maybe she was concerned about STDs. I would say that she had a perfect right to say what she did and didn't want to do and he should have complied with her wishes. To quote the statutes: Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. She had explicitly excluded unprotected sex from her consent, so I would say it does constitute sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:18 PM
2

..and the college men that they party and have sex with don't want them because they know what cum dumpsters they are,
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:31 PM
2

I'm sure the bizarre fixation which women have with owning numerous pairs of ridiculously expensive shoes and numerous matching handbags is a factor here.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:42 PM
7

The arguments about men having the right to rape and assault because they are stronger are poor because it would then follow that a stronger man is entitled to assault a weaker man. A society based on this would lapse into anarchy. I agree with the one on IQ but I think that we should say that we should accept that men make up the majority of leadership roles because there are more of them at the very top of the IQ range. You could say that women should be entitled to state pension 4 years later…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:14 PM
1

Nothing compared to when they have to take a biopsy!
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:12 PM
23

Completely agree. The victims here are the football players who have had their lives ruined, but people immediately shift the focus to some hypothetical rape victim who won't be believed. It is yet another example of how gynocentric our culture is.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:44 PM
40

I like how she's 'shocked' that she might actually face consequences. How about the two football players are awarded huge damages and she is forced to work to pay those damages?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:08 PM
71

Good result, but it's only one in tens of thousands of cases of paternity fraud which happen in the UK every year.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:01 AM
4

Bloody idiots! Turkeys voting for Christmas. Will they ever learn?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:56 AM
3

What happened to Sabrina Rubin Erdley. Has she been sacked? Has Jackie Coakley been prosecuted for defamation?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:55 AM
2

If the relationship turns sour they're likely to file a false rape accusation and get you expelled. Is it worth it?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:53 AM
1

I see that culturally enriched Sweden which has almost as many rapes per head of population as Lesotho in South Africa is supposedly one of the better countries. That's feminist stats for you.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:52 AM
3

Not sure that this is a useful argument because being a man is an identity that is not chosen whereas Islam is a religion which is chosen. Also some of the tenets of Islam could be construed as murderous e.g. it's not a sin under Islam to kill an infidel. I think a better argument against the assertion that manhood is murderous, is to draw attention to the fact that most child murder is carried out by women, so women are murderous too, they simply target those who are defenseless, which makes th…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:44 AM
5

This double standard just gives further evidence that feminists are using 'the interests of the child' as a smoke-screen for the interests of the mother. It's not in the interest of the child to be raised by a single mother and there is massive evidence to prove this. How about compelling all single mothers to give up their child for adoption? That would truly be best for the child and for the tax payer. The problem with getting single mothers to pay support to adoptive parents would be i) the s…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:22 AM
21

I guess that would be the toxic masculinity which prompted Ignacio Echeverria to run to the aid of a woman,who was being attacked by the terrorists in Borough Market last month. Ignacio died from stab-wounds.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:18 PM
2

In the UK we have to train 2 female doctors to do the work of 1 male doctor over the space of a career. The reason is that female doctors work shorter hours and a higher proportion of them retire early.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:08 PM
5

Yeah I hadn't seen that one and it's downright evil. She's trying to imply that his parents have already accepted his suicide.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:23 AM
6

This goes way beyond a one off, flippant jibe at someone to kill themselves. It was a serious and sustained campaign by her to drive a person who she knew was vulnerable and was open to her suggestions, to suicide. Remember too that she was on the phone with him as he was gassing himself in his truck and instead of alerting the authorities, she told him to get back in when he got scared and got out.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:20 AM
2

There are lots of excellent books which show this. One of the most impressive is The Feminist Crusades: Making Myths and Building Bureaucracies by Frank Zepezauer which exposes the feminist M.O. of using false stats to show that women are somehow disadvantaged and then lobbying government to fund bureaucracies (read jobs for the girls) and provide funds. Another more historic treatment is found in The Privileged Sex by Martin van Creveld. Both these books are available on Amazon.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:21 AM
11

I disagree. If she is advocating hatred towards me for an attribute over which I have no control then it's perfectly rational for me to hate her in return
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:47 PM
3

No and nor would I give such an establishment my custom
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:44 PM
-8

If somebody accused me of being a pedo to my face, I would break their fucking jaw. Maybe you should grow some balls. That's assuming that this incident happened at all.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:21 PM
6

The point is to draw attention to the fact that whenever there is a tragedy, female victims are emphasized and male victims ignored. Corbyn was particularly blatant about this. Where is your outrage that the leader of a major political party, should explicitly ignore the deaths of four men in his statement?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:23 AM
9

Inconvenient fact for the feminist bigots: The vast majority of first responders who went to the aid of the victims, knowing that there was a risk of further explosions, were men.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:30 AM
2

Men need to get informed about how blood typing can be used to determine paternity. For instance if you are type O, your wife is type O and the baby is anything other than type O, then it's not your baby. It's not a fool-proof method (e.g. she could cheat with another type O man) but it's better than nothing and blood typing of mother and baby is routine in maternity wards.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:15 AM
2

She announces in the documentary that she no longer calls herself a feminist but she accepts an award from a feminist organisation. Very disappointing. She should have turned it down.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:08 AM
3

These silly girlies shouldn't bother their silly little heads about such silliness
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:41 PM
-3

Based on the laws of probability
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:35 PM
-11

So Chris 'lives for his two daughters' and when they grow up, they're going to make two other men's lives a misery.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:15 PM
1

Don't say hello. Don't even look at them. Without their narcissistic feed, after about 10 hours their heads will explode.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:24 PM
3

Well expel her then!
/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:27 AM
1

@Rex9 Spot on comment. Biology/Reality trumps ideology every time.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:49 PM
3

Look up the Bench Book which is a book of guidelines for sentencing for judges in England and Wales. It specifically directs judges to give lighter sentences to women than to men for the same crimes. In practice on average men get 60% longer sentences than women for the same crime.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:35 PM
6

What a stupid comment. I think that given the choice between being 'patronized' and going to jail, I would be just fine with being patronized.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:30 PM
6

Wow! It never ceases to amaze me how some women can spin a blatant piece of pro-woman discrimination into an anti-woman message. You're trying to say that the judge suggested that brilliant girls are less common than brilliant boys. He didn't say any such thing. What he has done however as many do, is to be unduly lenient to a dangerously violent woman because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:16 PM
3

Be careful what you wish for. If men were more like women we would be incessantly playing the victim and whining for special treatment. Are you sure that you want the competition ladies?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:12 PM
4

No it sounds like a naive boy who doesn't realize that he is being used and manipulated by a much older woman. Just reverse the sexes and imagine a 15 year-old girl saying that. Would you still think that it was OK? The fact that you have no more insight now than when you were 15, tells us more about you than it does about the case.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:07 AM
1

Absolutely find a way of getting this out to the guy anonymously.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:10 PM
0

It would be better just to leave it up and let them damn themselves with their own words. Page should only be shut down if clearly libelous or inciting violence
/r/MensRights16/05/17 09:00 PM
3

Par for the course. When the victims are men they are referred to as 'prisoners' or 'inmates'.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 09:53 AM
6

'The trouble with all this finger pointing is that it leaves out half of the baby-making equation: men'. Ah yes you can leave out this other part of the baby-making equation when it comes to custody and even the choice to have kids, but when there's some 'finger pointing' to do, women like nothing more than pointing it at men. This is why mother nature endowed women with proportionately longer index fingers.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 07:43 PM
1

I would prepare for this turning into a full blown accusation. Make sure that you archive all communications which you have had with her. Find out what she is accusing you of and to whom. Start gathering your facts and evidence. Don't communicate with her
/r/MensRights14/05/17 07:24 PM
23

Love this 'women have faced millennia of oppression' excuse. As if the person using it has personally faced millennia of oppression.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:21 PM
4

Typically for the Guardian they dismiss the evidence for men's issues as 'anecdotal'. This is the first I have heard that CDC reports are anecdotal.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:37 PM
2

Vasectomies are usually reversible
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:34 AM
5

Always put Tabasco in your used condoms. LOL
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:32 AM
1

A review by a spineless little cuck who is either desperate to get laid or whose balls are in his wife's/girlfriend's purse.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:08 PM
44

I never give to Cancer Research UK because of their blatant sex bias. Their 'Race for Life' is an exclusively female event which sends a message about where their priorities lie.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:03 PM
1

Julia Hartley-Brewer is very fair-minded when it comes to gender issues, unlike this Green Party idiot.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:59 AM
2

I'd like to see sentences for false rape allegations like this in the west
/r/MensRights07/05/17 10:42 AM
4

I wonder if You Tube will go the way of Yahoo with it's Female CEO obsessed with feminist grievance-mongering.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:59 PM
10

In which case women should not be given responsible positions in society
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:27 AM
5

Ah yes, Brown University. Emma Watson's Alma Mater. Now we know how she became so indoctrinated.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:24 AM
5

This video has almost half a million views at the time of writing this. I understand that purchase/viewing of the documentary has seen a significant spike as a result. Good job, June.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:38 AM
3

How about: - Giving equal support to male victims of domestic violence - Giving equal punishment to women who commit crimes - Punishing paternity fraud when women either trick a man into raising a child that isn't his or into fathering a child by lying about being on the pill. -Spending an equal amount on Prostate Cancer research as on Breast Cancer research
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:47 PM
13

According to the article she had stabbed him on two previous occasions and there is no mention of her facing any consequences for those attacks. Seems like a very violent and dangerous woman. Insane verdict.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 03:28 AM
3

The DVD is Region 0 so it can be played in any country even if you have to order from the US
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:08 PM
2

She didn't have to say anything, just pretend that she couldn't remember. She was bragging to friends on twitter about how she was going to 'win big' from the case and buy a new car. Absolute scum
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:32 AM
2

Shame on the little slut who played the victim so that she could get compensation and didn't give a shit that he spent 2 years behind bars. I don't believe for one minute that she 'couldn't remember' what happened that night.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:47 AM
4

So they are against men's rights. Nice of them to spell it out so plainly
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:14 AM
4

If men didn't interrupt they wouldn't be able to get a word in edge-ways
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:29 PM
11

Watson accuses men of not being able to 'step out of the man-box' but it is she who is not able to step out of the girl-box (I won't flatter her by calling her a woman)
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:05 AM
5

They missed out the question: Are you still raping women?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:50 AM
6

Serves them right. Pushing politically correct crap is a huge turn off. Hollyweird needs to take note.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:21 PM
4

Oh isn't she the brave, outspoken heroine. She's stating the bloody obvious, but I notice that she has nothing to say about how feminism has attacked men's rights
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:27 PM
7

The reason for the fat acceptance movement is because the women in it are infantilized and have the mind-set that the world should be made safe and comfortable for them. It's time they left the nursery.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:18 PM
3

She sounds like a total cunt and her husband like a whipped cur. I bet nothing will change
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:10 PM
1

Not crazy they just want to co-opt funding earmarked for the black community
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:45 PM
15

False rape accusations by white women against black men leading to lynchings particularly in the southern states of the USA, have a long and shameful history. Look up the case of Emmett Till.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:42 PM
7

Yes and it's not a slip of the tongue either. She's deliberately referring to them as 'victims'.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:22 PM
14

It is good to see this being challenged. The proposal is an attack on the principle that an accused person has a right to a fair trial. We already have a system which is tilted against men when it comes to rape. It is uniquely a male crime and equally serious sexual violations by women such as forced envelopment, penetration with an object and sex with a minor are treated as less serious offences. The accuser remains anonymous while the accused is publically shamed, damaging his name even if he …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:27 PM
5

You are dead wrong here. When drugs are first tested in humans (Phase I studies) they are given to healthy male volunteers. If the drug is then deemed acceptably safe, it is then given to both male and female patients in Phase II and Phase III studies, the latter being the large scale clinical studies. Only after completing these phases can a drug be approved. So the fact is that men are used as guinea-pigs for the initial human studies and only when the drug safety profile is considered accepta…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter