TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PM_Me_Fordyce_Spots Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by PM_Me_Fordyce_Spots on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

There are tons of indian and asian business professionals in IT This makes me wonder what will happen when men or white people are the minority in IT or any job field, like nursing. Something tells me that the same programs meant to help women and people of color will be deemed sexist/racist if they aim to help men or white people.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:59 PM
–

Men are still expected to be breadwinners. The #1 reason for divorce is financial, and the majority of divorces are initiated by women. And it's tougher than ever for a man to be a breadwinner. Women have made great strides, even surpassing men in college degrees. Being a blue collar tradesman making 35k a year is barely good enough anymore when many women make more than that and have degrees. While women have progressed since the 1950's, men are still held there. The gender roles still apply to…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:22 AM
9

That is the way it's taught, in the same lesson we're taught to "never hit a girl" by our parents and teachers. Women deserve respect by default, men don't. Kind of ironic that if you treat a woman like a man, you're accused of misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:11 AM
4

For the same reason you rarely see a male cashier at the grocery store or fast food restaurant. Even Home Depot. Males are reduced to labor, grill duty, and shelf stacking out of sight, while women are considered the face of the company. People respond better to women spokespersons. It's also for the same reason nobody wants to hear a white person talk about racial issues; they'll be accused of racism, even if they're married to a black person and have kids. Or even if that white person was a vi…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:30 PM
–

Yeah, I know animals exhibit various behavior, I'm just pointing out that a neutered animal would probably still act "male". Maybe a better example would have been birds, where male birds have different feathers and do mating dances; I theorize that might still occur even if their sex organs were removed shortly after birth.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:47 PM
–

Whether or not gender identity is just as innate as sexual preference is something I haven't seen much talk on. Everyone focuses on the nurture aspect, like boys preferring blue over pink, but I'll bet there's some nature in there too. The hormones alone have to account for something. I imagine the answer could probably be found by observing simpler creatures without gender constructs, like a cat that's been neutered. He'll still try to mount based on his sex alone.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:16 PM
–

If I understand you correctly, complaining about women who cheat is already seen as sexist and an attempt to control the sexuality of women. I've seen plenty of feminists who would argue that monogamy is a tool of the patriarchy. Of course, men who cheat aren't given the same break. We're used to the double standards though. The MRM wouldn't even exist if they weren't so common.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:54 PM
1

The Github route where I have to accept every pull request would help prevent the vandalism that a Wiki would face. But if I get a ton of troll requests or not enough legit people contribute, I'll definitely go a route you suggest.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:10 AM
–

Hosting isn't really an issue. I was just burnt out and unable to do all of the writing. I posted a year or two ago looking for writers that I could add as users on my CMS, but didn't generate any buzz. I'm currently fiddling with a Github version per what someone in the comments suggested, and it's looking promising. Maybe being open source will make it easier for people to contribute. So, I decided to give this one more try before I give up. If it doesn't work out, the domain expires in a few …
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:07 AM
1

I agree. I get sucked into complaining about Valenti, Bill Maher, etc too much. I'm wondering if there's a way to cover things like GamerGate without giving credence to SJWs like Sarkeesian. One of the pages in the "Issues" section I imaged would be called "Bias in the Media". It's an important topic to cover, but I don't know how to write it without falling into the echo chamber trap.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:49 AM
–

Done. Should take a few hours for the DNS to propagate. edit Already working for me!
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:17 AM
1

That's my biggest reservation. I was kinda hoping someone like Pierce Harlan would show up, but I think he has enough on his plate. I'm liking the Github Pages idea. It would let people with better skills and knowledge than I to write and it would still be protected from vandalism.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:10 AM
–

That's actually a pretty good idea. I haven't messed with Github Pages yet, but if I don't outright give the domain/site away, maybe I'll do this. Let other people submit content, yet still be safe from the hijacking problems that our Wikipedia article has. I'm currently using a CMS (Concrete 5), but I could easily make it purely static so it'll work on Github Pages.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:20 AM
–

It's more the emotional toll, and I'm not a very good writer anyway.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:07 PM
–

I think I had that goal when I first made it, trying to keep it positive and on topic, but it's hard not to vent I guess. I agree though, the new site should try to stay on focus better than I did. It does come off as being preemptively defensive. It's justified, but still looks bad to the people we're trying to convince.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter