TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

POTATO_IN_MY_MIND Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by POTATO_IN_MY_MIND on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You can't, anyone who puts faith in either as a cast iron fact is an idiot.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:23 AM
1

Actually i happen to know a bit about this subject, men have been demonstrated to be able to take more pain with a higher pain threshold than women using scientific experimentation, women given testosterone can also increase their pain threshold. Men also increase their pain threshold by being in the presence of a woman, but women decrease their pain tolerance by being in the company of someone, man or woman. during childbirth the cocktail of chemicals the brain secretes actually doesn't allow w…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:22 AM
1

It is against the law in the UK for anyone to hit anyone apart from a parent is allowed to hit a child, which is outrageous. False, you can consent to being hit, and its perfectly legal for two people to hit each other consentingly, i do it most nights in boxing. Nothing stopping them claiming it was "kinky sex" etc. there are things you cant consent to though even if you do like branding etc. but its not as black and white as you think.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:11 AM
1

Jesus christ you people are complete and utter morons who don't even understand the most basic principles of statistics. Your submission is an embarrassment. Statistics of actual or reported events are completely and utterly meaningless regarding future likelihood, unless they have the corresponding exposure statistics. If women are much less likely to walk alone in certain areas then men, of course you will see a larger increase in male victims in such areas. The analysis is as retarded as clai…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:07 AM
1

I have fantasies of shooting people i don't like or who annoy me, but in reality even if i could completely get away with it and no one would ever know, i would never shoot someone just because i don't like them or they annoy me. The mind has desires that contradict other desires, everyone has this.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:47 AM
2

Too late Ricki Gervais did the same thing in his stand up Boy "i'm going out raping mum " Mum : " have you seen this (pointing to advert)" Boy: " (rolling up balaclava) what? I cant rape?"
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:43 AM
5

How odd, all i could see in the comments was the statement "help I'm so lonely and unloveable" repeated again and again. Sucks to be them :)
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:34 AM
-1

Innocent until proven guilty, or is that only on rape charges now? You people are hypocritical bigots.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:22 AM
2

No, there are powers also in DV that even if the victim doesnt wish to pursue the prosecution the police have to pursue it (evidence permitting) Someone should complain to the UK police as its a crime and she has no defence at all, in her own words she claims she committed a crime. She should be charged, it would at least send a message this shit doesn't fly, when the papers report it.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:17 AM
2

Nice to see someone who will actually understand something that most MRAs dont seem to realise. Adverts showing generic men as fools and idiots being acceptable is only allowed because it is universally known it isn't true, were as generic women cant be shown to be "lesser" or idiotic, because it ruffles feathers because it isn't as obviously not true. I.e a child humiliating adults is funny, the other way round is oppressive and disturbing. (one is based in reality, one is not) Like it or not t…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:10 AM
3

Why is it frustrating? It's their problem, they can whine and moan all they like they are the ones suffering. Its only frustrating if you feel a need to appease hysterical bullshit, which i dont, if a woman complains of chivalry and then complains of no chivalry its not frustrating its hilarious.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:17 AM
4

nonsense, hormonal effects on behaviour are unquestionably major. And are entirely based on genetic hardwiring. You think hormone levels and stress responses etc are all just a coincidence do you? The organ is the most expensive organ in the body, evolution has significantly changed us over millions of years physically, it would be absolutely insane to deny this difference isn't as present it its chemical and hardwiring. There is an evolutionary advantage for men to be the risk takers and women …
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:27 AM
1

Yes actually, the were much larger than you would think and got many votes for many years.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 08:21 AM
0

Yeah i don't waste my time on people who don't even understand how to use evidence or how evidence works. The number of times i have seen someone link a meaningless article or claim a "study" is irrefutable proof of x being true. Its just tragic. The hilarity is that these morons actually think they are on the side of "the learned" and that you are the one who is stupid. Its like arguing how high the waves will be in the north atlantic at 18:00 on sunday 12th june 2025, and you claiming "its imp…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:59 PM
-1

Lol the "reddit curse " as i call it. As I only ever see it on reddit,
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:38 PM
-1

That because you are too stupid to understand them. Your replies and logic however is hilarious, using racism and the romans etc, your ignorance and stupidity is absolutely hilarious. Its like you have absolutely zero understanding of evolution or even basic biology/psychology.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:29 PM
-1

You are one or the most stupid people i have met here ( seriously)
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:22 PM
-1

You're a fucking idiot. The fact you cant understand why organised racism in the last 1000 years or so is completely different to hardwired gender differences formed over millions if not billions of years is hilarious. Yeah good luck with you activism and education, speaking of education you could really use some.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:11 PM
-1

Oh dear god how do you not understand this, all your "concerns" are equally applicable to the example of me going to your house and beating you up now, (another man) Or do you think in cases of male versus male suddenly they use magic truth rays and establish who is instantly telling the truth. Your fear of "what if they lie" is equally applicable to me coming over to your house dressed as a mormon armed with pamphlets and beating you senseless, then politely claiming to the police you got agita…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:51 PM
1

Hysteria much?, its just a talking point raising some questions and looking at different angles there is no conclusion or campaign. Its just someone in open dialogue with themselves about how they feel about male pill contraception. If she was making a claim that it should be banned or not available or whatever then fair enough, but she isn't people can talk things out without having to be pigeoned holed as for or against on everything.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:20 PM
-1

You are still just using your own neuroses as evidence of oppression. Unless its validated by objective fact or evidence its meaningless. You realise the solution to your "complaint" is that she should have been arrested immediately and charged, which then leads to " i was just arrested despite being innocent" from another case. Objective strength of evidence should be the only criteria for action, if i, a man, come over to your house now, and beat you up, and you call the police, its still your…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:16 PM
1

Never respond cut all contact completely store and record messages build a dossier of evidence, go to authorities and put case that she is threat to the public either she needs to be in full time care or be prosecuted for her conduct (if illegal in your country).
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:09 PM
2

Best tip, don't date college girls.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:59 PM
-2

So you cant understand the difference between someone complaining that acting on a crime is not possible because no one would do anything, based solely on the evidence of "they FEEL/GUESS no one would do something" And the statement " by not acting (reporting) on a crime you deserve that crime to happen to you" Jesus christ are you for real? Comprehension is certainly not your forte, if you cant understand the difference between those things, i weep for your future.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:54 PM
1

Is this where i have to explain that mutations on the x chromosome are shared by men and women, but mutations on the y chromosome by men only.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:45 PM
1

Good old double standard of MRAs, i like how everyone assumes he must be telling the truth because he is male and she is female, the article is about allegations, until the verdict is given this is meaningless. Often i see people crying bloody murder over a woman alleging sexual assault and the defendant denying it, and based on allegations alone, there is a commentary that its "not true" from within this subreddit. This is exactly the same but with different genders and everyone thinks it must …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:44 PM
-2

Perhaps if you could actually read, you wouldn't have this problem. Show me where i claim he was to blame, and it was his fault, go ahead take as long as you like. Show me where i blame the victim. You are as bat shit crazy as the craziest of feminists.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:33 PM
1

Errr no, you have completely and utterly misunderstood. Men are descended from the survivors of a much higher competition environment. Men can take risks and evolve risky behaviours that can kill 50% of all men, but have no effect on the reproduction rates of mankind, the same is not true of women. I.e 9 men and 1 women produce less offspring than 9 women and 1 man, As a result men have a greater degree of freedom to "experiment" and die/fail/lose without jeapodising the existence of the species…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:30 PM
-2

I actually have no sympathy for you I'm afraid, firstly your own neuroses is not a data point, just because you feel you wouldn't be believed isn't evidence of it being true. And all of these issues are meaningless with just a simple video record of these events which if you were adamant about ensuring the truth is unequivocal you could have captured. Im not saying i don't believe you, I'm saying that your inability to act is your responsibility not societies failure.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:17 PM
1

Yeah i think i actually see the problem why men are not interested in you dear. How do i put this: "its not them, its you"
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:10 PM
1

Unless their concerns/complaints are based on food hygiene or employee safety grounds (from infection poisoning) who cares what they think? Their anger keeps me warm and makes me smile.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:07 PM
8

It's hardwired I'm afraid, its also a result of men being viewed as architects of their own circumstance and powerful/capable. But its a double sided coin if women are subconsciously seen as more vulnerable, they are also seen subconsciously as more incapable. The biological hardwiring is a result of women being the reproductive limitation of the species so there is a selective pressure to conserve and protect them, but by the same logic due to mans greater disposability we have had a more fierc…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:02 PM
1

There was/is a UK equivalent called the " monster raving looney party"
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:51 PM
6

Even if it were true, what is there to worry about, its not our problem, Its theirs.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:46 PM
-6

Its not quite as simplistic as you paint, if women are socially expected never to initiate contact, they suffer just as much by being unable to pursue people they might actually want to pursue. Being expected never to chase anyone has its own restrictions, being the pursuer might suck in the early days but once you pass the initial phase of taking it to heart and end up rolling with it, the worlds your oyster you can pursue who you like. If women believe they are freaky weirdos if they ask anyon…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:45 PM
27

This is genuinely hilarious, i absolutely love it. Such delusion, such entitlement, such hypocrisy, the usual tried and tested angle of "I'm lonely and unwanted therefore it must be men's fault, it couldn't possibly be because the men might not actually want me" Relationships are a two way street, if you are selling something and no one is buying it, thats your problem not theirs. Men and women each have their "ideal " , i often see and hear of men compromising and accepting reality and settling…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:38 PM
3

Who cares, ill judge whoever i like for any reason i like thanks, no one can tell me i must think a certain way, if i want to judge you because you are a fat slob in my eyes then i will, no whining or complaining is going to change that. You have always lost if you are telling people to "not judge you" for something that is a result of your actions/behaviours/lifestyle/choices. You can judge me on anything and everything.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 04:53 PM
1

No it is partly subjective also, people who look like someone you don't like from your past you will not find attractive, likewise the reverse. People carry with them their history of facial types and how they related to them as baggage.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 06:00 PM
1

This is only true amongst low level men, normal, average or above average men are not desperate and have various choices of women.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:48 PM
16

No doubt she will tell her friends you were intimidated by her strength and success lol. "why are all men so intimidated by a successful smart independent women? " The reality : "why did no one tell me i am a rude demanding uncharismatic bitch with unrealistic views of her own value ?"
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter