TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PPPPDAccount Archive

View 0 posts and 96 comments by PPPPDAccount on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They can. I think the problem with alpha-widows is that they managed to get with a guy who was outside of their improvement range. A 5 can become a 6 with effort. Outside of plastic surgery, they can't become an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 12:38 PM
2

I feel like shaming men for cheating is basically shaming men. It’s calling our innate nature, something we seriously can’t help, evil. Calling men who cheat weak is one thing but coming at his character is fucked up. Now I ain't sayin' she a gold digger...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 05:44 PM
1

I followed the link to the study from the video. I can't access the full article because sci-hub isn't working. However here's the snip of the abstract There was no correlation between men's IQ and the perceived intelligence rankings given by female adolescent judges, nor did these judges perceive men of higher IQ as more attractive. [...] As surprising as the inability of adolescent women to correctly evaluate intelligence is, it in any case may partly explain why they did not find intelligent …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 11:09 PM
2

If you read the article, it actually found that both high(95% percentile) and low(~25% percentile) paternal IQ were associated with autism. Low-IQ autism is usually the worse kind and also associated with ADHD and learning disabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 05:21 PM
3

In the video, he makes a point that studies have shown that past a certain point(120 IQ iirc) intelligence isn't strongly correlated with job success or achievement. So it's possible that there's a secondary threshold where the diminishing returns means that even high IQ women are better off prioritizing something else like social skills or creativity which better predict real-world outcomes. There's also the fact that high paternal IQ is linked with autism, and autism is linked with low reprodu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 05:02 PM
2

It seems to apply to both. Copying from the article Perhaps surprisingly, the investigation failed to uncover statistically significant, positive correlations between objective intelligence and rated sexual attractiveness of a hypothetical person at the higher-end of the intelligence percentile spectrum (e.g., 90th percentile). Thus, in this investigation's sample, a person with average intelligence was just as likely to rate a person at the 90th percentile of intelligence to be very sexually at…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 04:36 PM
–

Not OP, but I made a TL;DR. /u/nevomintoarce TL;DR Research shows there's a minimum threshold theory for intelligence 50th percentile(IQ of 100) was desired for a single date 65th percentile(106) was desired for LTRs Intelligence becomes less attractive when a person hits the 90th percentile(120) and becomes increasingly less attractive as the person hits the 99th percentile(135) People with IQs over the 90th percentile were still more attractive than people below the 50th percentile Younger wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 03:34 PM
1

It seems to me that this could easily be fixed by starting at a low dose and then swapping out bots for more alpha ones over a woman's lifetime. Young women get the average dudes and the little old ladies get the chads. I don't think it would take long for women to realize "low and slow" works the best. Right now the problem is that girls get with alphas and can't go back to betas. This would reverse that so that women would get the alphas at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 05:30 AM
1

I'm not sure that naturals exist either. I think what women want are the guys with the most confidence and perseverance because those are advantageous traits. The guys who are willing to put themselves out there over and over again until they "get it" without actually getting it. TRP and PUA attempt to bypass this process by understanding the why first and then working backwards. I guess you could say it's like cheat codes which makes it more difficult for women to select men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 02:01 AM
1

Oh, ok. It sounds like they may have just poorly explained it because this^ is the most common/only argument I hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 05:26 PM
2

I do understand that, but, in my opinion that sounds like a really lower case hatred, I was thinking more about genocidal type hatred. Ah, gotcha. Yeah, I don't see a good argument towards a genocidal type hatred. I just don't think that men can 'just' laissez-faire hate women, for the reasons I lay on my post. I'll accept that there are biological reasons for men not to hate women. Given that, the best argument I could give would be that these biological reasons blind men to things that they se…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 04:49 AM
2

I should have clarified that I meant limited free will at a minimum. Men can both hate women and have an internal belief system that requires all humans to have certain unalienable rights. Just like you can hate someone and still think they should have the right to freedom of speech or bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 02:48 AM
3

I think you're imagining something like chattel slavery. I'm talking more about societies prior to 1900s where women had limited rights under the guise of protecting them. However, since we're in PPD, I would make the argument that it was to ensure monogamy and equal distribution of a resource(women) to betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 12:40 AM
5

I can play devil's advocate. Is any human being able to protect that which they hate? If they see enough utility in protecting them, then sure. A person can hate Mexicans, but also hire them and protect them if ICE comes around. Wouldn't women just be men's slaves then? If they truly were seen as resources? Women are also a source of validation when they pick a man to sleep with. That's a 'resource' that men want. Therefore, they need limited free will to be able to choose between men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 10:51 PM
3

I think when people say this they mean women's personalities, or more specifically feminine attributes in the case of gay men. Men's biological need to protect women as a resource can be separate from them hating them as people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 10:07 PM
9

(so long as she is inferior to me) I think this explains it pretty well. If you can limit him to girls that are below you, then he will never be with a woman he wants to replace you with. If he's cheating, you can't gatekeep the women he sees so there's a possibility that he snags a woman with a higher SMV/RMV and gets emotionally attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 05:58 PM
2

Welcome to how men are treated in modern society. More like welcome to why TRP is so attractive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 03:46 PM
7

Tall woman + tall man = really tall sons. Height can become a disadvantage if it's too high. There's a lot of health problems(back issues for one) that come from people being too tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 05:31 PM
3

Posting under here since I agree. Sometimes I think ultimately what each sex wants is a slightly modified version of themselves in a hot guy/girl body. Women are looking for men that are really just less empathetic women, and men are looking for women that are more empathetic men. It's just that, because they are choosier, women get to dictate the terms and men have to follow them. The problem for John is that he's probably a highly systemizing guy(as are most guys who find TRP) so he has to wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 07:23 PM
1

blepharoplasty eyelid surgery bbl Brazilian butt lift For anyone wondering
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 09:04 PM
4

My guesses Women are more likely to seek relationship advice online. Female users are upvoted disproportionately by the mainly male lurkers which means their replies are usually near the top of the comment section. Libido problems for men are less common so women may seek out help more because their situation is atypical.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 02:00 PM
1

I think becoming too aware of the other sex's biological imperative is what's causing the damage to both men and women. It kills the blue pill ideal of love and connection by showing you how the sausage is made. For guys, sleeping with different women is still nice so there's at least a silver lining for them. I'm not sure of a silver lining for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 08:42 PM
0

She doesn't have to be younger. The guy can increase his SMV after he gets with his wife. Working out, social skills, etc. In those cases, he can pull more attractive women naturally. It's just that most guys rest on their BBs so they take a hit in SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 07:18 PM
12

Yeah, I'm thinking something like this. I've met some older women who still act that way, and most people just see them as childish and annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 06:39 PM
1

Not necessarily. The classic "boss screwing his hot young secretary" is a great example where the mistress is usually more attractive than the wife. I think it's more likely due to the fact that the man has already give his major asset(resources) to another woman so he has a lower SMV when he goes back to the SMP. He can lie and say those resources are about to become available to boost his SMV, but that's a lot of work over the long-term so most will opt to just fuck less attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 05:14 PM
3

That article doesn't say that men select for less attractive women, just that their APs tend to be less attractive. It's possible guys want more attractive women, but they have to punch down because the odds favor women so heavily. iirc sites likes Victoria Milan and Ashley Madison have a 10:1 men-to-women ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 02:55 PM
1

Not all religious people are the same. You can have a hyper-religious minority that believes in virginity until marriage and no divorce, and a religious majority that is more lax than atheists about divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:16 PM
1

There's a difference between major tenets that form the foundation of a group's belief, and minor tenets that are debatable within the group. My understanding was that hypergamy and AWALT are major tenets of TRP. How and why does TRP work if they aren't true? Edit: And, just to stay on point, most tradcons do believe in those things so that's why most of their arguments boil down to 90+% of women acting like their liberation didn't happen. That's not something that women are going to do freely s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 07:49 PM
3

That’s dumb as hell. There are too many people who all live differently in the world for this to make sense. I see your RP flair. Do you not believe in hypergamy? AWALT? "Enjoy the decline" is a oft-repeated phrase for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 05:30 PM
5

A career woman who lives like Sex and the City can be just as happy as a woman who achieved being a SAHM. One isn’t the counter to the other. The tradcon argument is that these two women can't exist simultaneously. Career women will ride the CC and keep high-quality guys from committing. This causes a cascade effect because high-quality women won't date down so they have to become career women themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 04:56 PM
2

Most moms have daughters as well. She knows 100% that any kids from her daughter will carry her DNA whereas she can't know that about her son's kids. Therefore it makes sense for women on a macro level to prioritize a woman's reproductive success to the detriment to their sons because it ensures their daughter's success as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:35 PM
1

Become a fertility doctor and artificially inseminate women with your own sperm. Preferably wait until you're 80 years old so you'll die in prison before they can collect anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 06:23 PM
1

Just saw your reply to him. That makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:17 PM
1

Just to clarify, can you give an example where you believe someone went through trauma? Or is it merely a matter of perspective? i.e a victim mindset
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 08:08 PM
1

I'm not the OP, just relaying info from WebMD. As far as treatment, hormone therapy to regulate your cycle and tissue removal surgery if it gets bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 02:31 PM
9

Endometriosis is an often painful disorder in which tissue that normally lines the inside of your uterus — the endometrium — grows outside your uterus. Endometriosis most commonly involves your ovaries, fallopian tubes and the tissue lining your pelvis. Rarely, endometrial tissue may spread beyond pelvic organs. With endometriosis, displaced endometrial tissue continues to act as it normally would — it thickens, breaks down and bleeds with each menstrual cycle. Because this displaced tissue has …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 07:35 AM
1

I think you misunderstood my point. I'm saying that the women that OP is talking about are still trying to ride their own form of CC. They've just replaced AF with AB. If the dude offered a relationship, they would take it. The majority of 25 yo women have jumped off the CC and are now pursuing BB which is what is causing the boost in most men's RMV at 27-33.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 08:32 PM
1

I think /u/decoy88 is saying that fucking a married woman is a dickhead move.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 06:58 PM
2

there is almost zero 23 year olds who have it, and far more 30 yer olds who have it. Right. That's why 30 yo guys are getting laid by 23 yo women which is the OP's original argument. BB. So, what of it? As long as the 30year old dude is gettign laid, he wins. I agree. From your original comment, I just thought you were disagreeing with the premise that women's interest in older dudes is due to them having more resources because you were (partially) agreeing with the comment that was supposed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 02:35 PM
2

If it was so, the 25 yo who date 30 year olds would push for marriage or babies, but instead they push for FWB? WHy is that so? Im in that exact situation (33, my FWB is 23) and she says the main reason why she wanted me is exactly BECAUSE I would not want to wife her, so she knows this is as pure FWB as it gets, with no romantic delusions. She knows I will always only give her the D and not make sweet eyes at her. If she's been riding the CC, then she's used to chads jumping ship at the first s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 02:15 PM
4

But that's because a significant % of 25 yo women are trying to settle down and have switched to BB strategy which is what the OP argued. A 30 yo guy is probably going to be more established and have more resources than a 25 yo guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 01:31 PM
6

I’m based in the US in CA so my vision could be skewed compared to other parts of the country and world. Yeah, I think this is it. I've lived in the South and Midwest where being a SAHM for 5+ years is still feasible for a lot of women. However expecting a woman to only spend 2-3 years out of the workforce is impossible if she's staying with the kids until they are 2. Doctors recommend at least 1.5 years between kids so 1.5 years + 10 months + 2 years = 4.5 years. And that's assuming no fertilit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 01:48 AM
8

But a traditional woman tho? In my experience, those are the ones that most want big families(3+ kids) and to be SAHMs at least until the kids go to kindergarten. That's 7-9 years minimum out of the workforce depending on how far apart the kids are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 01:07 AM
1

No, resources are always finite. There's always a limiting factor. Time required, labor required, etc. The universe may be infinite, but people will always have limitations that we must work within. The limiting factors can be reduced thereby increasing resources. It doesn't take 8 guys and a week to plow a field anymore. It takes 1 guy and 1 day in a tractor. Yes, that is what it boils down to. We've seen history repeat, but this time it'll be different, right? Throughout history, there were ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 10:33 PM
1

The issue is that a society that has to give more to the bottom can give less to the top. Resources are finite. Resources are finite at the present moment. If we grow 300M tons of food currently, that doesn't mean that we can't grow more next year. Also, even if the bottom takes more as a %, that doesn't mean the top guys aren't better off as a whole. 10% of 600M tons of food > 15% of 300M tons of food Do you think we'd have spend as much on the space race if we had starving people to take care …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 03:54 PM
1

Limiting the number of men who may contribute certainly won't help. It's easier to move forward when you don't have other people holding you back. Are the men at the top going to be able to accomplish as much if they're supporting the men at the bottom? I think this depends on what incentives the top guys are getting. If they like where society is going, then the added weight will be offset by increasing incentives as we get closer to their ideal society. If they don't like where society is head…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 02:44 AM
3

Distractions can only work for so long. It is why we are building so many prisons. Total number of prisoners != incarceration rate. If your country's population grows, your incarceration rate can go down while the total number of prisoners who need housing goes up. America's incarceration rate is at a 20 year low. Source. Also prisons have been touted as a boon for struggling rural communities so there's an economic incentive that is driving up demand. Source No, women are choosing not to have k…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:23 PM
1

Ah, gotcha. Work requires motivation and with the rise of sexless men we'll see a further fall in progress unless we get really competitive for some reason. But that presupposes that these men are the ones driving our advancement. Are they? Regardless, I don't think this negates my original point which was that we're in unknown territory. Is the rate of men easing-out to be expected for our current level of technology? Are we above an acceptable rate? Below it? No one knows because this is the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 04:55 PM
2

I guess I'm a bit confused about your argument. You say that Moore's Law is ending which seems to be implying that we've hit some limit on technological advances. However, you also say that war will bring about new developments which would mean that Moore's Law is irrelevant. Do you mind clarifying a bit? Also why is physical warfare necessary for technological advancements? Our technology has exploded in the past 80 years which coincidentally has been the most peaceful time for humans due to MA…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 01:25 PM
5

The issue is that you are assuming men will remain passive as they become more and more disfranchised. We are currently building more jails then schools and men are becoming increasingly aggressive. Are they though? Crime levels have and are continuing to drop as have testosterone levels. This is at the same time that the number of sexless men has grown to 30%. Porn, video games, and weed are doing a good job distracting them as you said above. We also have to consider the fact that the populati…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 12:03 PM
1

If you want better things, then you can work or build it yourself. If you want to be a 700lb couch potato in your standard issue house, that's cool too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:20 AM
3

Part of the book is online if you want to read it. Here's the relevant excerpts In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 01:58 AM
3

It's been a while since I studied it, but my understanding was that UBI is part of a transition period where there is still a large enough tax base. Once those jobs are gone, there would be no need to work to live. We could do whatever we wanted to do. Sounds like a pipedream, I know. However, outside of guessing, nobody really knows how it's going down.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 01:26 AM
3

My guess is that it would depend on what else was going on. UBI, legalized prostitution, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 12:48 AM
6

I haven't read the book so forgive me if he addresses this, but does he talk about automation? Previous civilizations had no other alternatives than to use men for protection or labor. A civilization that has alternatives hasn't been tested before so we're in new territory here. I guess the question then becomes if we can hold it together long enough to find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 12:29 AM
1

Skinny is attractive, but most people don't refuse to date former fat people. If anything, we praise them for having even more self-control than a person who was always skinny. In contrast, n-count is static. It doesn't allow for any change in behavior, and therefore doesn't necessarily show a person's current character.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:05 PM
4

I don't disagree. You can't get pissy about dudes lying to fuck you when you want to do the same thing to low n-count guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 12:34 AM
6

I'm not condoning it. I'm just saying why they have an incentive to lie. Just like how dudes have an incentive to lie to get into a girls pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 12:26 AM
8

Why lie though? Why would you be with someone who cares? Just date someone that’s as promiscuous as yourself (not literally you) and be happy. What's the ratio of promiscuous women to men who want a relationship with a promiscuous woman? If it's low, then those women could never get a relationship at all without lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 12:15 AM
2

women aren't competing with men for other women, men are competing with men. Hypergamy doesn't take place within the male hierarchy, more like adjacent to it. The woman is not competing in the hierarchy, although she is affected by its outcome. Maybe not for other women, but she's competing for herself. If she can provide for herself better than the dude can, then what use is he to her besides sperm? Isn't that what TRP complains about today? Women are competing in the corporate world thereby pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 11:10 PM
2

men do not like women competing in their established hierarchies, and will tolerate it only so long as her place is lower. Hmm...interesting. If we accept the premise that women are hypergamous, then the man must be equal to or higher than the woman in the social hierarchy to keep her committed. It's possible that men evolved to be hypogamous because a high-ranking woman is more likely to cheat or branch-swing to someone equal to or higher than herself. Just a theory tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 10:25 PM
1

The guys I know are cool with ribbing about men. However it's possible they are the exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 12:01 PM
0

Again, nothing about sperm and genetic mutations caused by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 06:26 PM
6

I work in the tech field, and most dudes I know just want someone who isn't going to spaz out and run to HR if they throw out some non-PC jokes, especially when it's about women. You don't have to act or banter like a guy, but you need to be chill and accept how guys talk with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 05:50 PM
2

If exposure to excessive sunlight, various chemicals, carcinogens etc can trigger genetic mutation (cancer) why not exposure to semen? Do you have any evidence for this? We know the mechanisms about how and why sunlight and carcinogens cause the genetic mutations that they cause so we accept them as true. We don't have any evidence that sperm a) causes genetic mutations and b) what those mutations would even do. I could say that squirting sperm up my bum can cause genetic mutations that make me …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 05:18 PM
7

I can't tell if you're trolling or not, but even if sperm from prior mates can change eggs which are in the ovaries, that doesn't mean that a) the sperm itself can cross the BBB into the spine and brain AND b) accumulation of this DNA can affect pair-bonding ability which is what the OP claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 03:55 PM
11

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592 They theorize its not from the partner, but from a male fetus. The fetus and mom exchange genetic material which can pass the blood-brain barrier and stay in the mom's brain. However, I found no study linking this to pair-bonding ability.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 02:27 PM
2

both. not necessarily having to act on the polygamy within a relationship, but making it clear that you would prefer to. dread game, as they call it. Ah, gotcha. Yeah, I don't think being polygamous makes you more attractive in and of itself. It's more so that you are high-value so other women find you attractive, and therefore you either already are polygamous because of the male imperative or have a chance to be polygamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 06:33 PM
1

I think the key realization for me with regards to theredpill was that the rejection of a polygamous sexual strategy causes you to be repulsive to women. Abandoning a monogamous strategy in favor of the original, evolutionary strategy is the only way to build and maintain attraction. Are you saying that women are only initially attracted to you when you're polygamous, or you can only maintain a relationship with a woman if you are polygamous? Edit: I ask because the general theory from my unders…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 05:31 PM
1

They work on top of that and focus on the societal part of things. I think this is part where TRP and feminism clash. From my understanding, TRPers believe that the societal part is very, very small. 95-100% of these differences are biological. AWALT for example. That's difficult for a feminist who believes that these differences including cultural factors that can be overcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 05:22 PM
5

So what's the truth accordibg[sic] to redpill? The very basic idea is that men and women want different things in dating, and these differences are biologically driven. Women want the single best provider/leader they can get, and men want as many women as they can get. Everything else is extrapolation from that premise. Edit: I missed the second half of your question Red pill (or the community) and the ideas that comeforth from this sphere seems very male oriented though so how do these ideas tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 12:34 PM
1

I agree that most people are ok talking about it in vague terms - oh, some women like this or that. The controversy comes in when TRP attempts to quantify these traits so they can copy naturally successful men. i.e. If you're only this attractive, you need to be x% alpha and y% beta. It feels like gaming the system to a lot of people, and people in general don't like cheaters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 06:08 PM
0

It seems like the problem isn't RPW itself, but trying to apply the strategy when you are <22. Guys your age aren't interested in LTRs right now, and older guys(23+) find you good for sex but probably not for relationships. 22-24 seems to be the sweet spot for RPW. The other 22-24 women will still be riding the CC while their SMV is high which leaves you competing with older women for dudes 25-29 whose SMV hasn't peaked yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/19 09:47 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgk7MXWQOAM&feature=youtu.be&t=16
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 01:36 PM
1

Yes, each subsequent male child is more likely to have younger sisters because mom has a higher chance of miscarrying the next male fetus. I was responding to your point specifically about the first child more likely being male.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:22 PM
1

Can you expand a bit more? I don't understand what you're trying to say. boys to girls? girls to boys?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 08:17 PM
5

In general, yes. The ratio is around 105 boys for every 100 girls. However, I don't think this aberrant H-Y antigen(the thing that causes the miscarriages and possibly homosexuality) makes women have first born boys over girls. I think it would be better stated that a first born male child is more likely to have younger sisters than younger brothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 07:25 PM
2

Gestational age or maternal age? It's a meta analysis so there are several papers involved. I checked the first one listed and they did control for both.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 06:48 PM
1

Not that I've found. The only correlation is having a male child.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 06:30 PM
2

According to this article, it does. Women* who had a male child had higher rates of miscarriage and low male:female birth ratio in subsequent births. Edit: who carry this aberrant H-Y antigen allele. Not all women carry it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 05:12 PM
1

I'm sure some do, but the fantasy is usually more of a temporary harem like a love triangle/square where the woman assesses which guy she likes the best and then chooses him only. The other suitors eventually leave because they can't be with her, or they find other mates and become non-sexual. In contrast, male harems tend to be more permanent. The guy may single out a woman as the wife, but the other girls continue vying for his affection even after being relegated to side piece status.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 02:48 AM
7

What country are you in, and how do they differ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 01:52 PM
1

Yes, I think it would depend on the individual person. Intent vs. end result, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 08:29 PM
1

Loving someone for their personality would be "catual love/value" by my definition but that assumes that you actually know the personality of your SO. That could happen, but there is no guarantee that you are not being deceived. Can't you also deceive someone about your looks? Botox, plastic surgery, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:31 PM
1

Just to clarify, would you agree then that the only form of actual value/love would be someone loving you for just the outer shell sans makeup, clothing, etc.? Everything else is merely an approximation or deception?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:09 PM
1

a bunch of electrical patterns inside of it Don't you still need to do something to display whatever is inside your mind? If a guy wants a girl who is nice, she still needs to show off this behavior by doing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:56 PM
9

Women compete harder for that small share of men, and many women just accept being single. https://theconversation.com/23-of-young-black-women-now-identify-as-bisexual-116116 Seems like a lot of them are turning to other women when high quality men aren't available
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:48 AM
1

Isn't money and being a provider more of a BB strategy? How would this do/be work for AFs who are naturally tall, hot, charismatic, etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/19 11:03 PM
2

Do you mean the hobbies ones or the feminism one?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 09:01 PM
3

Can you expand a bit more on what you mean? Do you mean women in general or attractive women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 02:32 AM
3

Yes, this was my thinking as well. Maybe not fully gay, but bi seems like a more optimal solution for men than being straight. It solves the issue of lack of sex because they could hook up with other dudes while still allowing them to have biological children with their female partner. Social stigma could be a problem, but it could be avoided by only dating women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 02:14 AM
0

That's why it's under the 'guys I know' part and not the universal one. It's just something that I've heard repeatedly from other men. Maybe they're all secretly in the closet. Dunno.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 01:07 AM
3

Age doesn't' matter. Freshness and hotness does. Doesn't this usually correlate with being younger in age? Obviously there's some 30 yo who are still hot, but generally it's around the age range that I gave. For most women it's a requirement for men to have that, but its also not what attracts women. Don't disagree here. Just talking about men. It's not for girls? Maybe making outrageous comments is not normal, but girls share more intimate sex life details with their girlfriends than guys ever …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 01:00 AM
15

Women are most attractive to men from right after puberty to around 23 Career, hobbies, etc. don't attract men Locker room talk is normal A man would fuck most of his attractive female friends, coworkers, bosses, etc. if he could Men aren't as nice to other men or unattractive women Some ones that I've heard from guys I know, but don't know if they are more true than not. Barring religious nuts, straight dudes would jump at the chance to be bi/gay so they could get laid more Think 3rd wave femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 12:31 AM
2

I could see some libertarian-leaning ones being against it because it's tantamount to the government forcing them to hand over their DNA to have their own child. A compromise would be some sort of opt-out system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 01:08 AM
1

OP would have been better off had they dropped the specific age and just said men prefer women closer to when they finished puberty. 15 is a bad choice because it's a weird age where half the girls are finished with puberty and the other half aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 03:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter