TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PSXSnack09 Archive

View 2 posts and 679 comments by PSXSnack09 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

it does matter, if it is a factor for someone to not fall in love then it automatically matters if we re talking about conventional relationships, it shows your attitude about love, sex, etc Now if neither party cares about conventional standards then go for it i guess, is not like all relationships need love to function anyways, i mean we can pretend that is 'love' but just because is functional doesnt means it is love. I fail to see why of all the dating preferences that are there, many as sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 03:56 AM
1

then go for other bottom of the barrel losers then? i fail to see whats the issue, the only reason why those fa bald gooners struggle is because they try to go for conventional women instead of other bottom of the barrel. If you think some DND cuck with horrible social skills is a winner just because he gets to bang a lot of landwhales with mental issues then more power to you i guess but i fail to see why are they torturing themselves so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 10:58 PM
–

Reddit in a nutshell <video>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 05:40 PM
–

lmao you re always belittling other men for having a low count, play leftoid now
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:30 PM
1

i am with a church girl atm but in the past i didnt filter people based on politics nor beliefs. And your bad faith framing aside, i fail to see why is it unreseanoble to expect that a liberal woman who preaches being against gender roles and traditional expectations splits the bill as per her beliefs.....unless they dont care about gender equality but only about what serves them.....
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:27 AM
2

depends on what you mean by "asshole", if you mean being a rude unpleasant mean person then no. If you just mean not being a "yes" man who doesnt gives any woman special privileged treatment just for existing as a woman then thats a good start but having a high n is more about the circles you hang out than about who you are or how you look. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:23 AM
-1

bro, you would be surprised
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:20 AM
0

even then i have seen some bottom of the barrel bagging a hot one for a night even if she later regrets it, so i dont think thats much proof neither
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 03:37 AM
0

why is having a high n count a proof of succes for a guy again? havent you seen the absolute plain looking bottom of the barrel losers that rack up high counts nowadays? go to a very liberal place with little to no conservative influence and you ll see what im talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 03:15 AM
0

now you re intentionally twisting my words, no wonder People prefered trump when this is his opposition
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 08:27 PM
1

you havent, in fact you even said "we dont care that you call us hypocrites reee" just let it go dude, you re just digging yourself deeper into the mud. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:40 PM
1

im not, you re just making stuff up cuz you cant refute the hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:38 PM
1

is not relevant because nobody is arguing about those points you re bringing up. if you gonna argue address the points people are actually making instead of arguing against imaginary points that only exist in your head
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:35 PM
1

>I stated what was actually happening, then stated why the incorrect assertion would be ineffective regardless. another admission that you re arguing about a point nobody is making. >And i literally did explain “sex positive” doesn’t mean “I get to be as sexual as I want to anyone I want anywhere I want! Nobody has argued otherwise humbleness to admit one is wrong is hard to achieve but enventually you ll overcome the anger and get there, dw
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:32 PM
1

Is not about morality, is about what people find attractive, in romantic context men dont care about the high counts of other men because they arent dating men same way women dont care if other women are bisexual because they re not dating women, if more women were vocal about not wanting to date men with high body counts then most men would agree it matters for men too, you re arguing bout morality where there is none.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:30 PM
1

because you re not addressing the point that it is hypocritical. but instead you re just resorting to some mean girl rationalizatons, which is by itself an admission that you cant really refute the point or can you demonstrate how it is not hypocritical to condemn people for acting up on the same values you claim to champion? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:26 PM
1

"wdym" their values? it is the values from the sex positive crowd the ones being discussed, it is literally the values from the same sex positive crowd shaming people for treating sex the same way they push for (when it isnt convenient of course). you just admitted you re not addressing my point at all but instead you re deflecting with a bunch of overly word saladified "grapes were sour" anyways type of argument. 😂 Did you just admit they re hypocritical too? i guess we can agree then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:20 PM
1

boy you re just proving that indeed you dont like the fact of how much my point exposes the hypocrisy of the moralistic sex "positive" crowd and you cant refute it Which is why the only thing you have been doing is anything but demonstrating how they arent hypocritical dw, humbleness to admit one is wrong is hard to achieve but eventually you ll get there even if you re high n
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:06 PM
1

you arent, you re arguing about a imaginary point that only exist in your head and being snarky about it doesnt changes that. keep malfunctioning over points you cant rebutte i guess the actual issue is that you dont like the fact of how much my point exposes the hypocrisy of the moralistic sex "positive" crowd and you cant refute it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:01 PM
1

you arguing over points that nobody is making is the actual issue keep malfunctioning over points you cant rebutte i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:58 PM
1

yeah but you re claiming such thinking is rooted in religion when it is not true and you just admited it yourself by claiming people dont follow its rules, nothing of what you said is true for the religion you re criticizing, maybe for others it is. Also im not justifying double standards, is not a natural impulse for high n men to prefer romantic relationships with low n women, is natural impulse for all men just like it is a natural impulse for people to prefer thin people over fat ones, even …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:56 PM
1

you re the only one talking about binaries here, nobody else again, keep malfunctioning over points you cant rebutte i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:47 PM
2

bruh, look what are the sexual rules for men under the religion you re berating so much, your mind is gonna explode when you realize they re the same for both women and men. Is clear everything you learned about religion comes from reddit Circlejerk echo chambers therefore everything you just said should be dismissed. Also, my point is not that high n men are justified in prefering low n women, my point is that is a natural impulse just like some fat guy finding a thin woman more attractive than…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:37 PM
1

you original comment is pure deflection too, it doesnt addresses none of my points but instead talks about an imaginary argument nobody is making. again, keep malfunctioning over points you cant rebutte i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:18 PM
0

much like the height filter that it already exists, the majority wouldnt be honest about it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:14 PM
1

i didnt say they cant, im saying it is laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:13 PM
2

i fail to see how this addresses my point in any way but keep malfunctioning over points you cant rebutte i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:12 PM
2

is not, is like some fat slob who wants a thin woman, people naturally find thin people more attractive than fat people regardless of wether they re fat or not, nothing indicates that fat person should find another fat person more attractive just because they re fat themselves, hypocritical definetly, but it doesnt fits this malicious frame you re trying to attribute to it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:08 PM
2

you re doing the exact same thing im pointing out lol, just because it isnt convenient to your narrative >Once again the binary thinking of “all or none” that Pills create is not his real life works. Then maybe you should practice what you preach because nobody is talking about a sex pest who harasses people so they sleep with him, we re talking about dudes who prioritize sex and if he doesnt gets it they go somewhere else
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:02 PM
1

i fail to see were you re trying to get at, the point is that is very hypocritical to preach sex positivy while shaming the very people who align with your views.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:58 PM
4

i dont have a horse in this race because i disagree with high n men chasing after low n women too. but n count thingy has never been about morality, it is simply a plain romantic turn off when a woman has a high count, of course exceptions exist, but generally thats the rule assuming we re talking about a conventional society
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:51 PM
3

what is contradictory is to berate someone who wants sex quickly (in the same way they defend) or someone who doesnt considers them ideal over their past and walk away. >also why are these people the liberal masses? How should i know? all i know is that most of them happen to be liberals angry that privilege comes with responsibilities. I know conservatives dont agree with with the trivialization of sex neither but conservatives dont preach sex "positivity".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:49 PM
2

im saying those people shame them like that
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:46 PM
2

when the liberal woman with a casual sex past wont split the bill cuz she knows how a lady should be treated: All this after giving you an extensive lecture about why caring about body count is an anticuated sexist standard that has no place in a "modern" society btw
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:32 PM
2

what are you talking about? all the shame is always some form of "you only think about sex" despite that not really being the case but they just openly prioritizing it the way they push form and that isnt coming precisely from conservative groups. also a self admitted high n person talking about degeneracy is ironic to see
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:27 PM
2

just move to a really liberal place and get into some weird hobby or something, in those places even the biggest bottom of the barrel losers can still get relationships or casual encounters, it wont be with supermodels but sometimes they even bag a billie eilish type (ie her resenment towards men lol) <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:21 PM
3

nothing more silly than some high n slag with a past of letting the biggest bottom of the barrel losers hit trying to mock a guy for having a low count, like bro, dont throw stones from a glass house, have some self awareness please 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:20 PM
4

well, those women who have had casual sex once or used to have casual sex but get angry when a guy also wants sex quick and goes somewhere else when he realizes she wont put out or get angry at some romantic guy who doesnt finds the thought of wining and dining some woman with a loose past ideal, or get angry when you propose them a 50/50 split, like it really doesnt makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:14 PM
2

i dunno why these dudes idealize high n men so much, when you realize that a lot of bottom of the barrel losers with nothing going on for them can still rack up high counts then it loses all this meaning of "guy who achieved the milestones of a conventional society" you ll be surprised of the amount of fat slobs and bald short porn addicts roaming around with massive counts yet you really wouldnt want to trade places with them, my point is that they dont even look like this giga chad they ideali…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:11 PM
5

im not a secular so i dont have a horse in this race, but i find it curious how these progressives push for a loose attitude about sex, and prude shame people who view sex as this huge, relationship-defining act that you shouldnt have loosely and not with just anyone Yet when a man openly prioritizes sex in the modern way they defend, they immediately reduce him to someone who 'only thinks about sex.' It seems very contradictory to champion sex-positivity while shaming the very people who align …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:07 PM
5

same reason it is laughable for a fat slob to demand a 60-90-60 super model and berate fat women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:05 PM
3

I have no horse in this race because im not a secular so sex on the first night is not even an expectation, but i find it curious how you all push for a loose attitude about sex, and prude shame people who view sex as this huge, relationship-defining act that you shouldnt have loosely and not with just anyone Yet when a man openly prioritizes sex in the modern way you all defend, you immediately reduce him to someone who 'only thinks about sex.' It seems very contradictory to champion sex-positi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:55 PM
6

When a woman with a high n count thinks she can judge a guys masculinity: Why would they get angry about that thought? dont they claim to be anti gender roles and all that? why would they get angry they dont get the same status modest women would get in romantic societies? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:49 PM
7

*40-60% of women on reddit 🤣, the remaining 40% is just men who identify as women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 05:11 AM
–

I find it curious how you all push for a loose attitude about sex, and criticize people who view sex as this huge, relationship-defining act that must be saved for marriage and put importance on other ways of showing love. Yet when a man openly prioritizes sex in the modern way you all defend, you immediately reduce him to someone who 'only thinks about sex.' It seems hypocritical to champion sex-positivity while shaming the very people who align with your views.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 05:02 AM
9

because is just political correct deflection, none of those women would be more willing to date a confirmed clean bisexual man who is loyal, they just dont like the thought of their man being with another man regardless Assuming that a bisexual man is more likely to have an STD or more likely to cheat is just plain bigotry btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:03 AM
–

the irony is that the ideal communist man is closer to a blue collar conservative than to a deconstructed progressive male feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:01 AM
3

so you re both poly is that what you re saying? to each their own i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:00 AM
1

oh really? you seem really invested for someone who claims not to care at all, hmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:01 PM
1

i already achieved my romantic pursuits And we still at the deflect stage :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:57 PM
1

deny, deflect, justify. We re at the deflect stage :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:54 PM
1

no, im saying that someone who defensively labels other people insecure in a reactive way with no further explanation is indeed a very insecure person :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:49 PM
1

that the call is coming from inside the house :), such opinion actually do comes from insecurity
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:46 PM
3

yeah i was just adding to the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:44 PM
1

bothered by the fact you cant refute my statement and you have to resort to ad-hominens instead. Promiscuous women have never been considered the ideal in traditional romance, rather the opposite, thats a fact, not an opinion, if stating that makes someone "insecure" in your eyes then it says it all about yourself and not the other person, hence why such opinions hold no value 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:43 PM
5

if you think sex is no different than a handshake then only pair up people with people who think the same. But dont get angry when traditional romance isnt a bare minimun expectation in those sort of relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:38 PM
1

yeah this is definetly the reaction of someone who isnt bothered at all
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:24 PM
1

yeah thats why you even took the hassle to look for a gif for it and everything 😂😂 Humbleness to admit one is wrong is difficult to achieve but eventually you ll reach it, dw.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:22 PM
1

snarky narcissistic remarks dont make your point any more valid you know, it only shows how much it bothers you that you cant refute my claim :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:15 PM
–

and again, whats so insecure about not finding that romantically attractive?🤨 Attraction is an impulse, not a choice
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:02 PM
–

whats so insecure about not finding something romantically attractive? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:41 PM
–

so what part of "is simply not romantic to wine and dine some woman who was the casual lay of some guy," you dont get? 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:40 PM
–

so you re claiming casual sex doesnt happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:37 PM
5

is not rocket science, a woman who has slept around simply doesnt fits the traditional romantic ideal that gives a guy the spark, you know, a princess you would fight a dragon for to give an example. She doesnt triggers that instinct. Doesnt means that someone wouldnt date her, after all many people date for many different reasons, be it comfort, stability or companionship, but that doesnt means they feel sparks. Even the high n people say it, that they used to date for sparks in their 20s and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:22 PM
–

is simply not romantic to wine and dine some woman who was the casual lay of some guy, get it? they just dont fit the ideal, not that it matter anyways since we aim for egalitarianism and the abolition of gender roles and we dont attach a big meaning to sex, that includes gender roles and traditional expectations directed at men too........right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:12 PM
–

Boy, nothing more romantic than winning and dinning some woman some guy casually slept with on a night, so romantic!, more like boooooring😂😂 You see, i noticed the biggest issue with this discourse is one side still operates from a traditional masculinity standar while the other does this modern 50/50 stuff. like yeah if a woman does 50/50 and has no traditional masculinity expectations then who cares about n count? But if a woman has even the slightest traditional expectation no way im gonna go…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:09 PM
–

Reddit in a nutshell 😂😂 <video>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:05 PM
–

reddit in a nutshell: <video>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:04 PM
1

but the difference lies in the fact that republicans preach that for everyone, whatever happens in your life is your responsibility and they dont aim to deconstruct traditional masculinity Democrats on the other hand claim that people are all inherently disadvantage except men for some reason and they should just accomodate whatever "vulnerable" minority democrats are pandering to atm, and despite claiming to be against toxic masculinity they weaponize against men all the time, you cant claim to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:26 AM
1

People like you is exactly the reason why Trump won, keep it up
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:12 AM
4

who cares about what redditoids say thought? im always wondering why redpillers waste their time arguin with reddit females when most of them arent even the club slags they want to chase after anyways
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:39 PM
6

lets not even talk about the fact that reddit is seen as an app for uncool shut in losers lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:34 PM
-1

people who say this are just a bunch of t​r​i​b​a​l​i​s​t​i​c ​a​p​e​ ​b​r​a​i​n​e​d​ t​r​o​g​l​o​d​y​t​e​s​
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:32 PM
–

thats just the nature of reddit, they want to act covert about it but it was proven long ago that reddit is biased against men, just look at the gender bent posts on the AITAH sub, when the poster was a man the verdict was YTA, when the main poster was a woman the verdict always was NTA along with calling her husband/boyfriend an AH
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:28 PM
1

Dont know about islamic countries but in the west it is an stereotype, but ultimatedly you dont really need to worry about that, after all, under normal circumnstances nothing should happen if you dont allow it cuz it takes 2 to tango, if a guy approaches every interaction with sexual intentions then thats his flaw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:25 PM
1

regardless, no is no at the end of the day, even more for believers, men who claim to be believers shouldnt even be interested in deranged acts in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:13 AM
1

alr, hypocrisy is okay sometimes is okay only when it benefits our narrative, noted. They’re just not loud and ragey about it. Thats because they arent held to the same scrutiny and bigotry the men are held to. The sexual double standard has only ever made sense if you view dating from a place of bitterness and jealousy Are those women who claim to be feminist but still expect a lot of traditional masculinity double standard traits in their potential partners bitter and jealous then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:57 AM
1

Ime men dngaf what you've done before Bs, the most consistent answers i ve got is "i rather not know" which shows they clearly do care as it would change their feelings but rather stay in ignorance or they simply assume the woman has nothing to hide due to the image she projects. Is like saying most women dngaf if men have seen hookers in the past or if they have had same sex experiences just because most women dont ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:32 AM
1

for some reason it just doesnt elicits the same visceral reaction
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:28 AM
3

winning and dinning a high n woman sounds unromantic as heck. Honestly not worth it unless she is egalitarian but if she expects princess treatment? boooooring. so far no one has given a good reason why a guy shouldnt care, it is all either hypocritical "holier than thou" arguments or shame and covert sexism, cuz even when they try to twist into a "muh equality and freedom" argument, when you point out that based on that then we should also abolish many male gender roles that are still imposed i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:19 AM
–

i choose to never do one myself so i looked for someone who is the same. The only way i would consider it is if it stays 50/50 and she has absolutely 0 traditional expectations from me
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:30 PM
–

not true, clavicular only wants to marry a virgin yet loads of promiscuous women throw themselves at him (not condoning his hypocrisy), you all better should give better arguments as to why it shouldnt matter rather than this blanket statements rationalizations. Cuz if your only source of validity for your claims is "only u​g​l​y ​i​n​c​e​ls ​care" then your whole argument falls down when you realize loads of attractive men care too and so far that aint favouring you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:42 PM
4

Liberals did it first, theres only 2 "conservative" subreddits in reddit all and they have to be extremely curated since a lot of bad actors try to get them banned by posting content that breaks Reddit's TOS. Meanwhile a lot of supposedly "apolitical" subreddits perma-ban you just for participating in other subreddits that they consider "wrongthink", then theres r politics which is supposed to be neutral yet disagreement with any leftwing position gets you banned. And people have seen this happe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:40 PM
1

deny, deflect, then gaslight we re at the deflect stage now
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:16 AM
4

that happened
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:16 AM
10

as far as im concerned, "pick better" is a rethoric pertaining relationships and even then is limited to western societies where women dont need men so they dont have to start relationships out of survival, not random men harming random women a different story is that you purpposefuly put yourself in dangerous places or situations, but that criticism is thrown at individuals regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 05:56 PM
1

theres many men who want to just get laid and are covert about it, so they go for women who appear easy to get and might be gentlemanly to them cuz thats the only way they know of courting, hence the "he was nice to me but changed after we slept together" Is like thinking Trump or Epstein are women top choices because many women would catter hard to them just to get clout and/or money
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 01:04 PM
14

Only chronically online men In a post where she claims she is running into those men irl all the time, you cant make this up 🤣 but hey as long as she does 50/50 and deals with her own shyet with low expectations towards me i wouldnt care neither
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:27 AM
7

I’m a 21F. I’ve been celibate for almost 4 years because I wanted my next sexual experience to be in a relationship. I’ve never had a boyfriend Hmmmmmmmmm <image> >What I’ve consistently observed is that the same men who say they want “low body count” women put in far more effort for women who are sexually available hhhhhh i dont buy that, like i do believe them men u specifically dated prefered the so called "hoes" but i call bs they were vocal about prefering women with low counts or whatever …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:23 AM
2

the joke is that left guys are the redpill i​n​c​e​l​s​ while right fat guy is the blue piller who calls them i​n​c​e​l​ lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 09:22 PM
3

he is dating other "reddit" women if u get what i mean
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:57 PM
3

<image> Ironic that this is the face of the redpill now
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:32 PM
3

Or is the problem knowing it cuts down on your dating prospects and you won’t accept the type of women you will get by being super cheap on dates? You say it like if egalitarian women who arent sexist nor entitled towards men were a bad thing or something lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:49 PM
7

When she has an n count over 3 but wont accept 50/50 <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:47 PM
0

so indeed redpill is just whatever bastardized meaning you make out of it and you just proved it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 07:17 PM
0

sure, let me guess, someone you dont like pays for sugar babies and you dislike whatever idea you have of redpill so from now on anyone who does that must be redpill, typical
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 07:03 PM
1

and im telling you reality disagrees with you, and loads of people who disagree with you arent this charicature you re making out of them so you dont lost your sanity, take care
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 06:59 PM
1

reality is more complicated than "people who disagree with me dont get laid or are broke or use money to get partners"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 06:45 PM
1

it is nuanced, you re just in hardcore denial for some reason
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 06:44 PM
1

you re just in denial
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:08 PM
1

nope, reality is more nuanced than that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:01 PM
1

nope
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:42 PM
1

sometimes yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:39 PM
1

who cares what mainstream redditors say in a website where facts are decide based on who get the most upvotes rather than actual reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:16 PM
1

if that was true there would only men on this thread, is obvious who the truly insecure ones, and is not women in general but the high n ones specifically
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:13 PM
1

i dont see how trad = abuse, my comment was more focused on the courting phase where a lot of women expect a man to demostrate his "worth" and pass her high standards, but then when a man also has filters then it becomes a societal problem that should be changed for the benefit of the women who dont pass those filters lol 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:55 AM
1

all the women in my family always told to respect boundaries and etc, so i self-improved and then looked for someone with said boundaries withouth compromising on my dignity, felt happy with and ignored the reeing from the pretentious sex "positive" midwits with countless failed relationships and high n counts on their back
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:51 AM
1

women with low counts can be more vocal about their preference so more men realize theres more women who appreciate men with low counts than women who shame men for having a low one 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:48 AM
1

well, women with low partner counts are free to reject and be vocal about them not wanting to date men with high counts
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:37 AM
1

if u dont offer to pay ur half then u re not egalitarian, not that u have to be, but to act all pretentious about n count only to do a complete 180 when it comes to dating dynamics that benefit you at men's cost leaves you no moral high-ground to stand on
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:36 AM
1

then you re free to not visit the sub anymore so you stop reading content that bothers you, simple solution
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:34 AM
1

who says they dont? pointless comment, keep raging
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:33 AM
-1

i dont get what u re trying to say
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:27 PM
1

>True but then why are they whining online? Why are u purpposefuly looking for opinions that enrage you? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:27 PM
-1

women care about a man's past? is that what you meant? yes, theres women who care, whoever they arent vocal about it unlike the women who say it shouldnt matter, hence why it is commonly believed that women dont care. about your 2nd point, assuming that the dude is secular or doesnt preaches any values around sexuality in particular, if he isnt satisfied sexually then he is free to walk away, nothing about forcing anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:10 PM
1

🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:40 AM
15

i thought only chronically online "incels" cared about that stuff 🤔, now it is trending? 🤣 (always has been no matter how much some alternative reddit nerd claim it wasnt, lol )
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:38 AM
2

caring about the past is sexist, misogynistic and outdated until u propose 50/50 and suddenly "u dont know how to treat a lady" or when u dont want to live up to traditional masculinity expectations of strength, stoicism etc and suddenly "you re not man enough" lol imagine having to "man up" for the leftovers of the casual sex world🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:20 AM
4

Weird times we re living at <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:19 AM
7

<image> Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:18 AM
19

start berating people who shame men for being insecure and maybe that way more men will be more willing to open up about their insecurities (assuming thats an insecurity anyways) that will never change so those women should just accept they re not romantically attractive for many decent men, and is pretty understandable why tbf
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:16 PM
1

The logic is " all those women will have casual sex and then that will be my eligible relationship pool after", wether that is true or not is object of another debate, but thats the reason why they feel so resentful, is like having to clean after a party you werent invited to and then those same people tell you "parties are wrong" like wth?🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:14 PM
2

weird times we re living at <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 05:42 AM
1

yeah sure, we ll also do a lot of mental gymnastics to convince ourselves that this person wants to rape and kill women just because they said something unrelated that we disagree with cuz otherwise we cant refute what they say
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 05:37 AM
2

white lies are only okay if u re dealing with a hypocrite, other than that, if u expect sex quick and all that is pointless to care about a woman's sexual history when ur preferences will most likely lead u to a woman with a lot of past
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 10:29 PM
4

except people like you keep moving the goalpost for what "misogynistic garbage" entails to justify social lynching and discrediting others' opinions and talking about "bullying" is hilarious when them internet justice league still needs an overly moderated echochamber with arbitrary rules to "bully" them men, lol, so stunning and brave
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 10:21 PM
1

the redditor who says mainstream reddit things is calling other people redditors lol, not even, anti-redpill redditors keep beating everyone over how traditional standards are bad and egalitarianism is the progressive choice and if someone doesnt abides by this then they re somehow evil and all sorts of moral condemnations, of course this only happens when the subject of criticism is a male and they use it to claim the moral highground and how much men should do better etc, but now that it was p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 03:33 AM
1

"hypocrisy and double standards are okay cuz women are human", the extend redditors go just to not admit they re wrong, sounds to me like you just dislike op cuz u re projecting whatever ideological prejudice you have of people who disagree with you on him and are just being contrarian 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 01:52 AM
4

most blue pillers here date on a completely different league, like yeah no heck, anyone can be a s​t​u​d​ in those alternative circles, but in the rest of the conventional world it takes more than being a p​r​o​g​r​e​s​s​i​v​e​ f​e​m​i​n​i​s​t​ ally who doesnt votes right wing or whatever, im a hundred percent sure that all of the experiences of most dudes who complain online were in the conventional world where men are still held to many traditional masculinity standards
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 12:46 AM
4

i argue you should ignore reddit dating advice from redditors since most red pillers, non bluepillers etc want to date conventionally, and reddit is generally full of unconventional people where sure u can still pull something no matter how much of a dork u are as long as u re nice, but this only works in those alternative circles, in the rest of the conventional world being nice wont make u automatically attractive to anyone hence why u see more men complaining about their struggles online (mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 12:39 AM
8

maybe stop choosing and bending over based on shallow reasons and actually look and test for intrinsical qualities associated to a good character? goes for both genders but many cultures pedestalize and attribute those qualities to women by default anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:31 PM
3

nothing, is up to a man if he wants to let that control his life or rise above that, ironically when i guy rises above that he has the most success relationship wise
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:25 PM
0

depends on the culture i guess, cultures that put a lot of emphasis on a man's honor and word tend to put more pressure on men's roles
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:24 PM
4

this is not true, the reason why a guy might struggle getting casual sex is not because of purity culture, he simply doesnt has what it takes, otherwise those guys woudlnt have problem getting into relationships at all even if purity culture was still there. besides is not like women let purity culture stop them anyways, loads of women still sleep around despite purity culture existing, they just hide it
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:18 PM
3

obviously a man should rise over all that, and it doesnt applies to all societies, but in many places that perception is still brainwashed into many guys since they re young
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:15 PM
21

also i would like to add that theres not much of a pressure for women to prove their womanhood through relationships and sex like it is for men. at least the perception of single or sexless = loser isnt pushed on women like it is on men
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:57 PM
1

is not like they dont care, they just dont think more about it than a simple casual though like "damn" or "crazy", if u ask them if they personally would date them they would have their own opinon, but other than that they dont constantly think about it, is kinda like when u see someone with bad hygiene, you might think "this person looks dirty" but then u keep on with ur day instead of keeping it in ur head.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 04:23 PM
2

of course people dont say it like that, thats just an hyperbole, but people do have their opinions, they dont think much about it more than how they gonna meet end meets, but when u ask them they do have their opinion about, they might say "yeah what a chump" or small sentences like that, or just keep it to themselves and then dont put much though into it and keep on with their lives
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:21 PM
–

nope, is like a fat guy who wants a fit supermodel, that would be ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:57 AM
1

dont complain about "low" libido if u care about a potential partners past, thats my take
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 07:43 PM
3

is not like they rabbidly hate them but they do see them with some negative lights and just use her for "fun" i guess. and yes i agree they re very hypocritical, but c'est la vie, not like that matters much to be attractive for casual sex anyways
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 09:16 PM
1

And men are complaining about those simultaneously complaining about women with low libido yeah screw those kind of hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:33 PM
1

here is a cold truth, not all men who have a negative opinion of sluts are vocal about it, and chances are high u have slept with some of them, c'est la vie
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:32 PM
5

i disagree, i think is more about romance and connection combine with some other dynamics that seems society will never let go off, at the end of day even in societies who are making their way towards progress, theres still many traditional expectations for men in dating that nobody is interested in changing. Theres just something really heartbreaking about knowing that the girl you feel so connected to and that u re trying hard for got to be some guy's easy lay for a night, like it kinda feels …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:23 PM
0

i didnt care, there was nothing to deal with, i just didnt find her love rewarding at all cuz it felt cheap so i found her boring but i wasnt really thinking about how hot the men she hooked up with were, tbh i the mere act of she engaging in hookup culture was already an emotional killer. regardless if u want a woman who is sexually unrestricted and opens up to u withouth much effort on your side you have to accept she ll have this kind of past. everybody wants and expect different things from …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:56 PM
-1

whatever, point still stands
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:53 PM
3

what can you offer at all that you'll attract that woman? be attractive i guess? 🙃 what a silly question, like if it wasnt the women namecalling and throwing tantrums cuz the men refuse to compromise
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:45 PM
1

obviously is not asked like that but ur premise is silly, like according to u people who are secure of themselves project and assume things about people they dont know?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:41 PM
1

i dont support hypocrites and i disagree with that sort of language, also im not asking them to validate me, im saying that the assumptions they make are completely wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:04 PM
3

compatibility is how much of a good match u make with that person and chemistry is how u feel about that person, u can be compatible with someone but not feel chemistry for them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:00 PM
1

what are u talking about? when have i even implied you were promiscuous or something? im just countering the usual attacks they throw and why i believe what i believe it is right but i respect others who follow a different path because i understand they dont have the same needs or desires, i ve seen cases of both promiscuous couples who both decide to do a 180* and abide by our values and they pair up to together, so is not written in stone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:59 PM
1

have you ever seen people who cheat on their partners but still "love" them? yeah not everyone loves the same, but funny how you dont even want to address the rest of my post and now u re just derailing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:30 PM
1

you re not even addressing anything of my post yet here you are claiming intellectual superiority, dont make me laugh, practice what you preach, if you dont like reading what gets posted in this sub, then leave, easy solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:27 PM
1

her: " this is a debate subreddit! if u dont like women's opinions dont post" also her: "why do you post stuff i dislike and why are u trying to debate! " if actually read my post u would know i never said anything about promiscuous women not finding partners, i said they just find unconventional people with the same unconventional motivations as them but im mostly talking about the arguments and attacks they throw towards the men that explains why ur response is just a complete emotional rambli…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:18 PM
2

"personal opinion" yet they cant make a simple argument against anything i have said despite me countering all of their personal opinions 👀. also u say "question for women" yet the first example u brought was the weekly thread that anyone can avoid if they want to, you re just grasping at straws here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:09 PM
-3

If you don’t like women stating their own opinions you re just contradicting yourself, you re complaining about those men stating their opinions then u proceed to justify the women stating theirs, if you dont like hearing those men stating their opinion then just ignore and go to a safe space or something, you are the one complaining that they talk about it, im not complaining about the women chiming in, im simply dismounting their arguments. you basically are saying whole load of nothing. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:02 PM
1

not true, i mean nobody is really asking for specific numbers, most who ask just ask if someone has been on and about or not for the reasons i mentioned and then they ask for the number if the reply is "it is low", the love of a high count person just doesnt feels special or rewarding or romantic for many people, thats all really.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:58 PM
-1

i dismounted all of your silly arguments one by one, u know that and thats why u made an irrelevant comment that has nothing to do with the post, im not complaining that they criticize my preferences, im proving that their criticism is bs
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:37 PM
2

how are they complaining about the women they get if they are single according to u? if something they re complaining that they dont get women, but like i said being okay with uncharismatic women is the least of their problems if thats the case. We're talking about compatibility Not at all we re talking about chemistry, a man can be uncharismatic and still be a functional partner, but like i said traditional expectations are still enforced on men a lot, so if promiscuous women wont compromise de…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:36 PM
1

also im not disgusted by them, i just find it difficult to feel chemistry for one and i can get myself to open my heart to them romantically speaking, but other than that im okay with having them as friends
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:31 PM
1

so no rebuttal then? kk 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:29 PM
2

even active women dont want passive men. Y'all need to stop using the low standards of a minority of men as an excuse for anything. If men are that pathetic, it's not a shock that they're single. First of all having a high charisma is not a high standard at all, someone is not a worst person or a worst partner or anything just because they re uncharismatic, second of all is not a minority, the majority of men dont care about that and thats how it is, 3rd dont u see the cognitive dissonance of cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:29 PM
1

ah, i see what u mean, yeah thats absurd, but thats not the reason why someone askes about the past, is not about who had it bigger or whatever, it is about emotional attraction. men can have feelings, wishes and desires of who they open their heart to u know
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:21 PM
3

evolutionary or not i dont support hypocrites and i also support women who also refuse to date promiscuous men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:20 PM
1

implying women lie about their promiscuity, but then also implying non promiscuous women dont date promiscuous men Not contradictory in any way, all the "non-promiscuous" women u have dated simply have no reason to tell u otherwise considering u re promiscuous urself loads of non-promiscuous women see promiscuous guys the same way u see promiscuous women, you talk about being experienced but then put women shaming virgins as an example, while ignorning that practically all of those women are far…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:52 PM
1

look up tim tebow and his wife and then come back to keep talking rubbish. btw "low count" women who dont add oral to their count, dont count 🙃 the only thing that shows here is how delusional u are
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:50 PM
2

most men dont care as long as she is not drag to be around
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:24 PM
4

So, if a woman was promiscuous, she has to accept you being a non-functional slob who won't take care of himself, won't give gifts, and is a boring stick in the mud who can't drive? Either gender roles and expectations are lenient for both or deal with it. Charisma is not a solely masculine trait. Many women are charismatic. My point is that a woman doesnt has to be charismatic for a man to love her. I'd see no reason to pair with any man that offers nothing but his "forgiveness" of my sexual hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:22 PM
2

As an endowed man I have never in my entire life experienced the need to ask the N-count of a woman. I know that unless she's fucked literal hundreds, I'll be her biggest. what does this has to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:18 PM
2

sure buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:42 AM
0

Why do people feel the need to talk about it at all with people they’re not dating? but where are they purpposefuly looking for women to say it on their face? men talk about it between themselves and the women are the ones who feel the imperious need to chime in, it is the women who go out of their way to come to this subreddit to be annoyed about it, other subreddits like 2xc or other echochambers dont allow such discussions, if it bothers a woman so much to read it online she can just ignore i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:34 AM
1

sure sure bro, im sure those supposed low count women you were sleeping left and right with totally told u the truth 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:32 AM
3

but those arguments do get made in this very subreddit and thats what im countering, seems like u have no rebuttal for them and u re just reaching
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:28 AM
2

sorry to break this to u but "low count" women who dont count blowjobs dont count 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:24 AM
3

lmao look at promiscuous men and tell me who are they sleeping with, here is a clue, is not virgin or low count women, it is mostly other promiscuous women. the fact u fail to see that just shows u re not looking at things with nuance. bet the only reason you think women dont like virgin or low count men is because you saw some random woman saying that but you didnt stop yourself to think about who that woman is, you ll notice that in 99.99% of case it is a promiscuous woman or woman with a high…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:19 AM
1

ur point being? like i told u in real life is mixed but thats not something that people casually bring up for obvious reasons. many men have told me they just rather not know cuz deep inside they know it would hurt their perception of their wife/girlfriend, not to mention they also have things they rather not have their wife/girlfriend finding out about so it all evens out, thats what i ve seen so neither narrative of it "being ultra important" or "not mattering at all" is supported
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:06 AM
7

not at all, loads of women dont want a promiscuous man, is like when u all say "women dont like virgin or low count men" but what u all dont seem to catch is that the women saying that are far from virgin or low count themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:02 AM
2

im talking about real life cuz ur comment kinda presented it as that, online is a different story. in real life the most common opinion i ve heard is "ignorance is bliss" or "i rather not know"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:00 AM
5

promiscuous men are desired mostly by promiscuous women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:52 AM
1

not true, i ve seen many guys slut shaming the women they hook up with on their backs, hypocritical yeah, but nevertheless they do and they can get away with it, c'est la vie this weird narrative that dudes who slut shame or care dont get laid or whatever sounds more like just world fallacy nonsense an ego lashout rather than a factual argument is like claiming that only good men can get relationships or something like that
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:49 AM
8

the idea that having dinner a couple times makes you boyfriend and girlfriend is a weird recent internet phenomenon. Said the redditor after spitting mainstream reddit beliefs, you cant make this up. sure, going on dates doesnt implies commitment, however in many places is expected to at least have the decency to admit they re dating multiple people on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:47 AM
2

claiming that no women insult men for being virgins is peak gaslighting, as if i wasnt a common attack thrown at a man
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:45 AM
2

who is doing that? who is going around randomly starting conversations about it? virtually everyone just keep it to themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:41 AM
-1

hey if thats what u wanted thats completey ur choice, u have ur reasons for it and honestly more women should think like u imo. Why do people feel the need to talk about it at all with people they’re not dating? Who is doing this? virtually all men keep it to themselves in real life, if u re talking about online discourse then i invite u to ignore content that enrages u
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:40 AM
4

people dont really care, a guy who falls for that gets the label of "chump", c'est la vie
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 07:43 PM
2

but im not doing it a competition, i just think it is silly to say men should change when same expectation isnt put of women, comes up more as self serving than an actual moral concern. besides i dont care, i think women should date whoever they please, i just dont like pretentious midwits who act like it is a male flaw and give slack to a male for having parallel preferences to women while acting like the womens preference are an example of morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 07:40 PM
3

thats because u re a redditor, u re special. i never met a single one, sure some were more progressive than others but never to the full extent, many still prefer a guy who doesnt watches porn., still want chivarly and lead from him etc. but yeah if thats how it is then all good for both of u, praise for not being hypocritical👍
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 07:36 PM
11

i think theres a bit of hypocrisy on this theme considering many women talk and treat nice guys the same way men talk and treat women with extensive pasts. like if u think about it many women also think nice guys are cheap and easy guys who any woman can get, the might have him as a friend, use him for trips or gifts, or just have a relationship with him until something better comes along, is a curious parallel, but everybody just accepts this as it is while the opposite is controversial, but oh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:59 PM
2

for men yes because it is tied to traditional masculinity expectations, women can be uncharismatic or depressed and a decent man will still love her
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:34 PM
3

but someone can be pleasant to be around despite not being charismatic or being depressed, if she doesnt finds him "fun" relationship wise then thats a different story but it kinda supports my point, but that doesnt makes the guy a bad person
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:30 PM
3

Low libido men will date low libido women, so a dead bedroom is often fine with both, and that's great. the thing is, i dont think they even see it as dead bedroom, based on my experience, low libido people in reality have a reactive libido, sex is a consequence of an already amazing happy and fulfilling relationship rather than a necessary ingredient for a relationship to work, so not sleeping together doesnt means their love isnt strong. but many born again "virgins" want to have it both ways …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:28 PM
9

imo sex or love with anyone who didnt hold intimacy to a high regard doesnt feels special and thats a valid reason, nothing to do with studies nor pair bonding nor nonsense, is just not emotionally fulfilling nor romantic, it devalues the connection, from a man it feels like he only sees women as bodies and from women it feels like any given horndog can get her. being chosen by someone who is very selective and protective of themselves feels extremely fulfilling and rewarding for some reason, ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:22 PM
3

that doesnt makes anyone a bad person in any way, that expectation is not egalitarian but to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:12 PM
4

i mean thats answer on itself, if u dont remember how many people u have been with then that means it is a very high number, quite explanatory answer for someone who doesnt likes that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:10 PM
3

They might say something like they’re saving sex for “someone special” on the first or second date, and want to only trade oral. I’m 100% sure these types would lead to a worse sex life for me. agree those people who think oral doesnt counts are 100% full of bullshit and have a misleading view of sex, im quite vocal about my limits when it comes to bodycount and i wouldnt be okay with those at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:08 PM
2

because u brought up men first and tried to make it seem like if it is something only men talk about, but reality is women also have their hangups about it and way more than men
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:07 PM
4

You can be depressed, just don't use me as your therapist. ahhh, deal with it in silence then or whatever but just dont open up to me eh? You can be passive, just don't whine when I'm assertive. care to expand? Charisma is kind of needed for any good relationship, in my opinion, and from both parties. No one wants to date a wet blanket. nah not all, traditionally it has been an expectation from men while for women simply not being unpleasant to be around is enough, uncharismatic women get into r…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:05 PM
9

look up the deadbedroom subreddit and see how many people are in stuck in deadbedrooms with former promiscuous people, now im not saying that a promiscuous person is more like to end up in a dead bedroom, im just saying that ur premise is flawed. but i agree u wouldnt be compatible with a conservative person at all, u cant give them what they need and u cant get what u want from them so.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:02 PM
3

how does being charismatic or not depressed makes u a good person? u can be uncharismatic or depressed and still be a good moral and respectful person, it has nothing to do with it. as for the rest, depression is just like autism, is heavily penalized on men while for women it doesnt really affects their dating life that much attraction wise c'est la vie
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:52 PM
2

i said "society" in my original comment and you are the one who tried to make it about gender and now u re just being pretentious. and is not just "some women" it seems to be a significant amount of women who feel like this for it to be an accepted notion at this point, only difference is that bisexual men are men and they just take it to the chin rather than starting movements to call women incels or other slander just because he considers her preferences politically incorrect personally i dont…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:50 PM
2

i prefer to say that love and intimacy with them doesnt feels speciall or fulfilling or romantic, and i agree both men and women shouldnt sleep around, but i think calling people whores does more of a disservice to ur argument than actually helping
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:43 PM
1

lmao ask most straight women how they would feel if their man is bisexual and has been with another man in the past even if it was just kissing, the answers will change ur view faster than anything i can say
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:42 PM
4

basically if im allowed to be depressed, if im allowed to be passive, if im allowed to not be charismatic, is okay with going 50/50, doesnt expects gifts from me nor cares if i become unathletic, if she is okay with me not driving and not being handy and more traditional romantic masculinity expectations. if basically she loves me just for being a good person and still shows openess to me withouth me having to prove myself then im more than happy to date one, but we all know this is impossible, …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:40 PM
2

honestly the term whore is too generalized, like the term incel, most women get called whores despite them not really being whores so i think u should drop that term
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:37 PM
0

technically they do count but most people dont seem to care when it involves other women, i guess thats society for us
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:36 PM
2

💀to each their own, not everybody dates for the same reasons nor expects the same from a relationship anyways to be fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:33 PM
6

i would happily date a high body count woman provided she is 100% egalitarian and has zero traditional masculinity expectations from me (and of course i give her the same lenience) but havent met a single one who abides by this, all of them still have some conventional expectations from men while expecting lenience on their side, so i might as well chase someone who makes me feel emotionally fulfilled and in love, of course this wouldnt be a relationship based on chemistry but chemistry isnt the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:32 PM
1

I said that the redpill analogy can be applied to more than dating! count to 10 and read slowly instead of reacting emotionally. again, so much fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:15 PM
1

YOU say it’s not. I havent said anything of the sort, again, fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:54 PM
1

"anyone who disagrees with me is redpill" i dont subscribe to most of redpill beliefs but redditors gonna reddit i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:42 PM
1

stop arguing against narratives that arent being made, thats will be better for ur mental health. so much fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:38 PM
2

theres nothing to answer there because u re argaint against a narrative that isnt even being made, your premise is not even factual. Again, so much fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:29 PM
2

So he says that the information is only one thing. You say it’s more than that. i havent said anything like that, U re thinking too much about it bro, is not that deep, that narrative only exists in ur head, sorry u wont get to "own" a "redpiller" today (i dont even agree with the majority of redpill premises but for redditors like u anyone who sligthly disagrees on something must be everything u dislike) so u can sleep peacefully at night, so much fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:21 PM
2

everybody is saying in the comments that it is information. im sorry the existence of redpill and people who disagree with u shake u emotionally so much, fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:13 PM
2

lmao i said it is an analogy, and i litearlly said it isnt a movement or an ideology, is just information (and is implicit that in this case it is about dating) that people filter differently, fatigue. Why so triggered? Bro said that while writing walls of text about narrative that only exists in his head, fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:08 PM
2

It’s just information. But one guy says it’s just information about daring. You said it’s more. 🙄 right, like if wasnt implicit that in the context of this sub it is about dating. again, sooooo much fatigue, no wonder reddit's userbase has such a bad reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:02 PM
2

what part of "redpill is just a set of information" you dont get? typical redditors like u are fatiguing, thats a fact
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:51 PM
1

a dont see how "drugs are wrong" is invalid if a drug addict says it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:28 PM
3

u re being intentionally obtuse and u know it, of course redpill in the context of this subreddit is about dating, u seem to be excited about some sort of gotcha that only makes sense in ur head. but my point is that redpill is not a movement or an organization or a religion or an establizhed consensus with leaders or whatever, it just an analogy, a set of information that is presented as being the "uncomfortable truth" and individuals filter it in their own individual way so thats why posts lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:19 PM
2

bro what are u talking about, u re arguing against a narrative no one is making., of course red pill in the context of this subreddit is about dating, but theres not a consesus on what redpill is nor theres a bible with established "redpill truths" to act like if it was some sort of organized movement or something, is just a set of information and individuals deal with it in their own individual way. so much fatigue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:12 PM
2

the strawman of redpill that people argue about in this sub is about dating. but again, the term "redpill" is just an analogy, many people also use the expression "i ve been redpilled" when they find out meritocracy isnt always as real and ass kissing can take u further than being good at what u do in ur career, redpill means being aware of the uncomfortable truths of something, now wether those truths are factual or not is irrelevant for the point of this post
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:50 PM
2

what are u even arguin about? where im saying is not about dating? redpill is just an analogy, in the context of this sub it is about dating but other people use it in labour contexts too. Is just information and everybody takes it differently
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:37 PM
1

not just sexually but romantically too apparently, they re too good to be compared to a man romantically speaking so it feels offensive and humiliating to them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:35 PM
1

not really, im saying they come from societies where women already get a lot of empathy and support by default, them being even more empathetic wont suddenly make women more empathetic towards them and tbh the harsh truth as that theres no reason for the women to do that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:33 PM
7

Red pilled men generally come from societies where women get a lot of empathy and support by default so it doesnt resonates with them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 07:27 AM
12

redpill is not a movement nor ideology, is just a set of information and everybody deals with it differently, some act accordingly, some get angry about it, some become nihilistic, some start podcasts etc. no offense but people who see the world like u do give so much fatigue man, no surprise trump won
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:29 AM
1

many women also say it is humiliating having to compete with men too which reveals a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:17 AM
5

if a drug addict says drugs are wrong his idea isnt invalidated just because he does drugs. regardless it is true many redpill tactics ironically attract those kind of women the most hence thats why they re always complaining about women with high body counts and awalt and etc
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:11 AM
–

not at all, men cant call women sluts even if she is one, not that im advocating for it, i just find it silly how they all act pretentious about how what people say online matters and overly moderate but only when one side does it, even it is fair criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:33 PM
1

thats true, thats why u can seen things like cuckoldry being normalized so much in reddit. Reddit is very left leaning in general, someone said it the best here: reddit is very alternative so it is pure c pium since they cant accept the fact that a guy can have a preference they dissaprove of and still do good in dating, mostly ego but they try to hide it as some sort of moral concern, but when u think about it, if abusers, assholes, cereal kllers, players, cheaters, etc can do good in dating, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 11:39 AM
-3

and you sound like a narcissist but u re a redditor so
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:23 AM
6

MAGA is about taking human rights away, which was partially voted for by men who are mad that women don’t want them. lmao tell me everything u know about politics is from reddit echochambers where only people who think like u are allowed withouth telling me Red pill is about playing mind games with women like negging and dread game Redpill is about doing what actually "works" for dating, wether they re correct or not is irrelevant, they just think all women are club women apparently, but regardl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 12:10 AM
1

no but the small instances that it happened they were quite rude to me, not that i would care if they werent so pretentious about it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 12:01 AM
1

all good then 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:57 PM
3

yeah but what does that has to do with: "Men start whole movements to manipulate women into being insecure enough to put up with them and to take human rights away." you re just reaching by saying that cuz u cant accept that ur precious women who can do no wrong are the ones in the wrong here
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:56 PM
2

I’m not sure that there are a lot of examples of praising modest women that aren’t slantwise implied criticism of nonmodest women all of them are, nonmodest women still get offended about it and throw all sort of narcissistic lashouts simply because they take it as an implicit attack on their social status, but it is all ego driven, is not like people are claiming they re worthless human beings, cant be helped since thats human nature and no amount of activism will change that as society has no …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:55 PM
6

lmao sure maga is dating focused movement, seriously, u need to log off reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:42 PM
1

im not saying they re low quality but their dynamic is defnietly unconventional, but since u seem to be quite progressive u probably dont care about that anyways some more power to u
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:40 PM
6

yeah "find me hot even if im fat" is such humanly cause. Men start whole movements to manipulate women into being insecure enough to put up with them and to take human rights away. you need to interact more with people instead of getting ur ideas of men from misandrist echochambers
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:37 PM
1

women can see that in real life, men don’t care about body count (or weigh other factors way more strongly) and women with a higher than average body count don’t have issues dating thats because u re a redditor, u re special
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:32 PM
1

okay then, they are very lenient when it comes to women gender roles, like, women arent expected to be homemakers and they are encouraged to go to school and get degrees and all that. I mentioned both women being forbidden from any positions of real power (like giving a toddler a plastic hammer and telling them they're helping build the shed 🙄) and the gender roles prescribed to women being much more numerous and restrictive and the guidelines that are routinely issued (once again, by men and on…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:28 PM
–

im curious, what exactly bothers u? since not everyone says this coming from the same place. like for example if a guy thinks intimacy with a woman who has been around is not special why would that apply to a woman who hasnt been on and about? (assuming he is not a hypocrite)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:18 PM
0

you re not challengin anything, you just love to throw snarky remarks and back handed passive-aggresive attacks towards people who disagree with u
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:12 PM
2

ahh, they seek it from women because they only value women's validation, other men's validation not so much
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:07 PM
9

reddit definetly attracts a lot of narcissistic and bpd women, reddit is very left leaning and lefties in general have a lot of mental disorders
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:06 PM
1

im not moving the goalpost, when i said "egalitarian" i was talking specifically in the context of the relationships. you on the other hand seem to be talking in a general sense but i dont see how only men being allowed to be priest translates to women being considered inferior in catholicism when that only applies to eccleasiatic rules and is not like priest or bishops get any special benefit other than a fancier looking hat. The men have all the real power in the Catholic Church. THE POPE does…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:05 PM
3

u said that those men who are the minority were more likely to seek validation from women because other men dont validate them so im simply refuting ur statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:56 PM
1

of course people in real life arent this predefined person based on their dating wishes or desires, like for example just because a man cares about a womans past doesnt means he wants a trad homemaker or something like that, real life is more nuanced so thats why i brought it up. Yes he watches porn and we watch it together lol, I wouldn’t care much if he did engage in prostitution in the past though Good to know that then 👍, would you also be okay if he had same sex experiences in the past?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:54 PM
3

not really, the men dont care, not that they validate them but they dont care, they do dismiss them if they get extremely moody or negative, they dont think much about it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:46 PM
3

maybe it would be easier if those statements werent generalizations
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:45 PM
8

not true, a lot of women get very angry or offended when some guy praises modest women despite him not really saying anything derogatory towards women who have been on and about. also sex positive people love to attack a man's masculinity based on how many partners he has (or in this case doesnt has) so i disagree they take a neutral stance also i dont agree with hypocrites who say women shouldnt sleep around but men should
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:43 PM
6

the women themselves see them as weak lol (though they dont openly express that unless it becomes too much)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:39 PM
3

the manosphere is not even popular, like sure some topics u see mentioned there are also discussed in real life (but not with the same aggresive rethoric) but other than that the manosphere is not popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:38 PM
4

sorry im from a more conventional place so men who complain about dating (and are looking for validation in general for their woes) are labelled as bitch boys, so is not something u see commonly happening
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:36 PM
1

but im talking about relationships and everyday human interactions, not about ecclesiastic orders and even then is not like priests or bishops get any sort of special freedoms, they still have to abide by the same rules nuns do, and when i say most of the times i mean that most of times it benefits women only, while sometimes it benefits both men and women but in catholicism men are still held to a lot of gender roles and everybody is okay with it so no complains here, im just simply revoking ur…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:33 PM
1

both are criticized equally, is just that certain women take it worst than men on average. men take it to the chin while women start whole movements. in fact you re the literal example of this
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:28 PM
1

i do know a lot of men who need a lot of validation from women but is usually just sexual validation, nothing about the opinions or topics u see on this subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:26 PM
3

then whats the point in having mods whose only purppose is protecting people like u from feeling offended when u start attacking others with passive aggresive attacks then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:25 PM
-2

how come they dont count? so what people say online dont count? u realize that reddit is mostly anti redpill right? does that means that what reddit says doesnt reflects real life at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:22 PM
1

not at all, catholics are actually more egalitarian in favour of women most of the times, theres some who are hardcore trads but most catholics are very lenient when it comes to gender roles for women, not that im complaining, i really dont mind it as a catholic myself. also then if all religions arent the same then it is pointless to put religion as a whole as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:19 PM
8

then everything is fair game then
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:14 PM
2

then u would know that polygamy is sinful, that selling ur daughter is not even a practice and that both men and women should stay caste until marriage or a least be mindful of who they choose, but of course u re redditor so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:13 PM
-1

rubbish, certain political orientation is filled with zealots who will absolutely resort to many types of attacks against someone who doesnt agrees with the "right" opinions 100%. to put an example of spaces (because certain links are against the rules) theres subreddits like askmen, askmen advice, or guy cry where a lot of women go and get angry at what the men say there for example, meanwhile men are banned from their female counterparts
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:10 PM
1

"tell me everything u know about catholicism comes from reddit echochambers where only people who think like u are allowed withouth telling me"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:07 PM
3

redpill didnt gain popularity because of random interactions in forum boards, nowadays they do reinforce it but redpill was already somewhat of a big thing before online discourse stopped being treated as some fringe unserious thing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:05 PM
1

i would agree with u if men actually went to those women, but they dont
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:04 PM
3

catholicism doesnt, u be for real please
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:03 PM
0

also is very easy to discuss politics when everybody is forced to agree with the same ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:01 PM
3

then i agree
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:59 PM
-1

bs religion calls for both men and women to be caste until marriage, it seems that the only knowledge u have about religion is reddit echochambers as for the rest of ur post it always the same people posting there strawmanning people who care than the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:57 PM
4

most of women’s choices don’t need validation from men or anyone else, and they certainly don’t need pedastalization not true, examples? ye old body count discourse, meanwhile men just take it to the chin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:55 PM
4

guycry got invaded by women policing what men can say- askmen the same askmenadvice the same meanwhile their female counterparts are very open when it comes to them banning men who say anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:51 PM
4

Proliferating false and hateful beliefs about others is not treating them with common human courtesy and decency if u all can freely paint them as abusers, rpists, pdfiles etc then i think it is fair game
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:50 PM
-4

u really said this when an overly moderated subreddit like 2xchromosomes or askwomen exist
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:48 PM
5

im all for everybody criticizing others opinion if they can also take the heat back, but all i see is a lot of strawmans clearly only allowed from one side
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:48 PM
-2

bs it is always some woman whining over some random post or tiktok they happened to run into. no man is actively going after random women to talk to them "unprovokatedly" about how much he dissaproves of their lifestyles, it is the other way around of those women actively finding for content that enrages them, a lot of "girl bosses" cant really handle someone having opinions that make them uncomfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:44 PM
1

And religion and politics get discussed all the time in real life where I live. thats because u re a redditor, u re special
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:41 PM
-1

then maybe they can shut up about it and go enjoy their perfect girl boss lifestyle then instead of doing so much character assasination and slander about the men they supposedly dont care about? yeah totally the reaction of someone who doesnt cares
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:37 PM
2

there are certain topics people just dont wanna talk about in real life because it generates a lot of conflict same goes for religion and politics, is just something people avoid talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:36 PM
3

ah damn so you re all dating trad adjacent masculine men now, what else? he doesnt watches porn and his body count is low and has never paid for prostitution and he always pays when u go out ? i dont wanna argue but i could say the same shit just because i know of men who have somewhat "succesful" relationships despite their usage of escorting services, yet still to act like it wouldnt matter is just being in denial
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:33 PM
3

says the one who has to make up so much character assasinations about random people whose dating preferences make her uncomfortable 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:29 PM
1

random country lmao, feminists keep blaming those same men for the election outcome, it seems cognitivie dissonance has been triggered
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:06 PM
2

false, nobody is saying that, are men online personally going to u to stop u from doing whatever u want? maybe own ur choices and live ur life instead of begging for validation so much
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:03 PM
8

lol https://preview.redd.it/cgr6vi3s65uf1.jpeg?width=320&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3c612ccc561539179654ce055d589ed24b854ed2
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:01 PM
1

previous USA election
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:00 PM
3

so can a man in he dates for convenience rather than chemistry, claiming this is like a fat guy flexing his weight to a body builder
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:59 PM
1

but look at who they get married to, thats an important distinction, if it was about being married then we can claim that purchasing escorting doesnt matters neither
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:55 PM
1

well is because these guys are talking from a conventional pov, if we go the unconventional then anyone can get a relationship. If u want someone like marilyn manson then yeah count wont matter, if u want someone like tim tebow then count will definetly matter
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:54 PM
1

so little they matter they you all keep blaming them for the election why do you all care so much and waste ur time coming here and telling them how little they matter if this is the case then? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:52 PM
1

so little they care but they really get offended when someone says "the past matters". seems women havent gotten comfortable to the fact that men arent monolith and they are allowed to have diverse opinions and feelings too
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:48 PM
1

yes i agree, if a guy expects sex quick or watches porn or isnt willing to wait for a long time (potentially years) then caring about a potential girlfriend's past is silly
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:52 PM
1

because straight men are not attracted to other men, seriously if straights prefer straights then how come straight men wont date other straight men? if a straight man had to choose between another straight man and a bisexual woman who would he choose? seriously at this point you re just being purposefully obtuse
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:38 PM
1

except it is only straight women the ones who have issues about it. "straight men prefer straight women over bisexual men therefore straights prefer straights" is a moronic statement and even you yourself know that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:25 PM
2

it only shows u re all a bunch of self serving hypocrites, like if it wasnt mostly straight women the ones having hang-ups about it while most straight men dont care
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:23 PM
2

yes, the definition of straight is "attracted to the opposite sex", not "attracted to other straights" if your basis to reject a bisexual man is the simple fact that he has been with other men before then is no different than a man rejecting a woman over her past. those mental gymnastics deserve a gold medal
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:20 PM
–

lmao at this point just admit you re a backward bigot who thinks bisexual men arent real men instead of doing this insane mental gymnastics to whiteknight narcissistic hypocritical self-serving progressive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:16 PM
–

yeah yeah straight men dont date bisexual men cuz they re bisexual, is totally not because straight men arent attracted to other men by definition 🙄, insane mental gymnastics u re pulling here, ranked whiteknighting lmao Because what are straight men attracted to? yeah, straight men are attracted to WOMEN, thats why they would date a straight WOMAN over a bisexual MAN, they choose the WOMAN on the basis that she is a WOMAN, not because she is straight, and they reject the bisexual man on the bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:01 PM
–

because straight doesnt means attracted to other straights, otherwise by your insane logic an straight man would rather date another straight man over a bisexual woman, your whole argument is just ridiculous and im finding hard to believe you actually think your logic is sound, but what could be expected from a typical redditor anyways all this just because you cant accept the fact that this discussion proves the moral high ground many high n women put themselves on to berate others standards is…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 01:22 PM
–

you keep repeating this unhinged statement out of a knee jerk reaction but the only thing you are doing is making yourself look really homophobic, not even yourself believe that nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 01:03 PM
–

gotta make sure cuz it no the first time some smart ahh subconciously speaks from the premise that bjs dont count when they re trying to make a point
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 05:31 AM
–

redpill was already a thing more than 15 years ago, you re just being in denial PW dating history isn't proof of anything How come it isnt? he was a literal chad and by your own words that makes it valid
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 05:30 AM
–

the past is the past mofos when the person with a past is a bisexual man: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 10:22 PM
–

im saying that women who have given head to multiple guys before but didnt "sleep" with them dont count as "low body count" or "virgin" and im also saying that just because someone has a count of 20 doesnt makes a count of 10 low
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 10:17 PM
–

sorry but women who think blowjobs dont count arent what people have in mind when they talk about "low count" let alone someone having a "low" one just because others have a ridicuously high one
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 10:13 PM
–

He died 15 years ago. Do you not have a more current example? So what if it was 15 years ago? how does that makes his dating history an invalid example? Exactly, everyone's point. Y'all act like it matters. But if it really came down to it you'd be happy to be in a relationship. looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool, i see why it is said that redpill guys and their haters are just the 2 sides of the same coin
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 10:07 PM
–

if we gonna use celebrities as the criteria then look up Paul Walker's dating history, redpill confirmed lmao but tbf i think i would also happily marry a rich high n count woman as long as she is 100% egalitarian, well hell even if she isnt she makes up for it by being rich also isnt her song what u all call bad sex that supposedly only "redpill" (whatever the heck u feel like calling redpilll this time) do?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 09:26 PM
–

projection, you always come here and interpret everyones statements in bad faith, acting purpposefuly obtuse to deflect and throw indirect personal attacks masqueraded by some superficial notion of respect, all while crying for the mods when people understandably react negatively to your nonsense all while pretending you re some have some sort of intellectual superiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:47 PM
–

who are u calling piller mate? and everyone can see through ur weak concern troll façade, no need to hide it anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:39 PM
-1

yeah but bringing that up doesnt makes any sense when nobody is doing that here, for ur hyperbole to make sense caring about someones past should also have negative implications just like wanting a servant, but it does not, yet the responses are still the same so lets get rid of this moral superiority nonsense when it is all completely self serving
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:24 PM
-1

your kind says it a lot only when it doesnt goes ur way 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:22 PM
0

who is saying they want a servant who adores them with no complains thouhg? people are just saying they cant control the fact they cant feel romantically attracted to someone whose past they dislike how is that related to caring about someones past? u can disagree with the way someone navigates dating but resorting to difamating them is like another level of narcissism masqueraded by a vague feeling of concern, maybe mental health institutions should start calling it cry-narcissism maybe?🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:51 PM
1

damn God forbid a man also has feelings and they choose who to open romantically to😭 fragile narcissists and bpd crazies shouldnt be allowed unsupervised access to the internet withouth taking their meds first honestly speaking, if this how they react online imagine if some guy opens up about this irl, cba. (no support for hypocrites btw)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:38 PM
1

tell em queen
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:30 PM
–

Redditors gonna reddit🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:52 AM
1

when i was a teen i subconsciously cared about it but i wasnt as thinking much of it, probably because at that age everybody unexperienced or very little (not always though) but when i got older and i started to notice that there were who people where already on their 4th or 5th by the time they reached 20 and justifying themselves while attacking anyone who had their opinions about it along with many other dynamics is when i ironically i started to become more strong and mindful in my aversion …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:45 AM
–

seems someone is talking from experience, curious that an empowered woman like u attracts a lot of men who only last 2 minutes , hmmm, u enjoy having to do weird stuff just so ur man can get hard and keeping his balls empty so he doesnt leaves u 🤙
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:38 AM
–

sounds more like what a resentful narcissist would say, dont project ur pornrotten views of sex on me
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 11:19 AM
2

i think meant lying about virginity to get hookups, not relationships, not that i agree but is not really the same dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:22 AM
3

thats because u re a redditor, u re special
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:11 AM
3

moving the goalpost how? anyone can be a womanizer if they leverage money to date gold diggers who only "love" them because of their money, that proves absolutely nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:10 AM
2

that doesnt means 99% of women dont care about it, ask most of them and u ll notice a pattern. He used all the money he made letting guys suck his dick to take me on multiple international vacations, gifts, and paid my bills. He's literally my favorite boyfriend I've ever had. lmao redditors are so goofy man. , curious that all the things that made him ur favorite boyfriend were a bunch of materalistic shallow stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:01 PM
2

but in this case the original commenter said that he didnt care about someones past, is not important to him so why would it matter if a girl lied down to him about it and then he found out it is high? by his own ideas that doesnt makes her a different person so why would it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:56 PM
2

yeah even redditors themselves agree redditors suck <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:53 PM
2

why are u wasting ur time arguing with redditors? <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 08:01 PM
2

not at all, shared core values and chemistry or compatibility is the most important , the rest fits in naturally, what makes my relationship good is not sex, is the other way around, our sex life is good cuz our relationship is good, and we dont need deviant poses or deviant tricks or porn tropes for it to be good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:50 PM
1

but if for you someones sexual past doesnt matter because u think everyone has their own and is not a big deal and we live in modern times then how come it is a deceitful lie if it wouldnt have made any difference for you? for it to be deceiful is because the other person knew u considered it important somehow or you think it does matter Guys who list their height as several inches shorter will far more likely be interpreted as a ‘white lie,” or that it was done in good faith and they don’t actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:43 PM
0

dont get me wrong, if a person lies to someone who they know it is important to, then yeah thats shitty. but in this case if the person that is being lied to doesnt cares about the past and they think everyone has their own and is not a big deal then why would they be upset if they lied about their past? is like if they lie about their favorite color and it turns out to be blue instead of pink, what difference does it make if thats something u consider a non-issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:42 PM
1

this is so disingenous but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:40 PM
3

sex is not why i value my girlfriend, in fact is not even a reason for me to enter, stay or leave a relationship. the connection, the romance and the bond we have together is what makes sex feel pleasurable and special, not how much she can perform, but to each their own man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:34 PM
1

wth are you on about we gonna get political now? lol you re clearly trying to be a smart ahh here but now that it didnt go the way you wanted suddenly it is a serious matter. own your choices man, we already know who are the ones who thinks your girlfriend having been fucked by a lot of different men in the past is positive thing, thats closer to cuckoldry objectively speaking than someone who says they dont want that in their life, to each their own seriously you re unhinged if u actually belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:29 PM
2

yeah most well adjusted women dont care if a guy has had gay experiences in the past or if he has used escorting services
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:22 PM
1

i dont see why that should be an issue, though, if they lied about their past but you re a person who doesnt cares about it what difference does it make? is like when some women claim they dont like guys who lie about their height, but only guys who lie up, if a guys lies down and turns out he is taller than what he initially said those women dont seen to mind so clearly the lies arent the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:19 PM
1

Like, you’re vibing with a girl, having a great time, she likes you, but she’s seen one too many dicks for your liking, you’re gonna walk away? Thats not how it goes but okay
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:14 PM
2

and you seem to be conveniently ignoring mine, but most importantly you re ignoring that cuckolds see that in positive light, while these guys dont ,so how does that makes them cuckolds, it literally makes them the opposite, but to each their own, who are the ones who think a woman being fucked by a ton of different men before is sometime positive and valuable and call anyone who disagree insecure and all sorts of names? yeah, sounds like softcore cuckoldry to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:13 PM
5

naaaah man , maybe u value women as sex objects and thats on you, but i definetly dont think a woman is worst or better depending on her sexual performance, to each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:10 PM
2

I cant stop thinking about my gf with another guy” Cuckolds dont say that, they just say they find it hot, and also cuckolds really appreciate adventorous and experienced women , they are so secure of themselves they dont even care if their partner sleeps with somebody else in the present👀. im not joking they actually say that, you might agree or disagree but in their eyes if you re not okay with that, they see you as insecure and their reasoining is "my partner sleeping with somebody else doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:01 PM
2

What do you think a “fixation on a modest past” means here? How does that translates to "thinking about how many men a woman has been with when you see her naked"? all these topics are literally in the context of relationships, nobody is talking about casual encounters when it comes to wether it matters or not cuz everybody agrees it doesnt matters for casual sex, you re just making stuff up
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:58 PM
1

but nobody is doing that wtf? get your facts straight, n count discussions surround the topic of life lasting relationships, not casual encounters, nobody cares about the past of a woman for a casual encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:53 PM
1

theres no difference between being wanted for your money vs your body, same dynamic, sluts are only wanted easy uncommited encounters and sluts are the ones who they can get it from, not because theres something particulary appealing about a slut, one is a monetary object, the other is a sexual object, different process, same dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:47 PM
3

are you seriously claiming that the guys who want a potential partrner to have little to no past secretly value women with a lot of past partners and thats why they re cuckolds? sorry but the only ones who claim experience makes them better is the other side, softcore cuckoldry if u ask me
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:44 PM
2

so? doesnt changes the fact they are only wanted for sexual gratification, men who go to them do so because they happen to be the most accesible, they are only wanted cuz of their bodies, not because theres something particulary extraordinary about them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:34 PM
2

they voluntarily dance for a guy because of his money and they can still refuse, sluts are only "wanted" because of sex, different object of exchange, same dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:27 PM
7

thats not cuckoldry, cuckolds appreciate it and value it, they dont find it a negative, cuckolds are what you all call very "secure" of themselves eh? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:24 PM
–

...............
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 12:20 PM
5

reddit is so goofy man, on one hand the past doesnt matter, but on the other hand a guy should be happy and proud that other men "trained" his wife to be good at giving head (cuz thats sooo difficult right?) for him, like what? sounds like softcore cuckoldry and objectification to me
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:41 AM
–

it says it was deleted
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:29 AM
2

what would she be jealous about? she is objectively pretty, confidence? thats like a guy being "confident" because a lot of strippers want to dance for him or because a lot of street workers want to sleep with him or that a bunch of goldiggers want him
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:26 AM
3

the might not be "obssesing" but that doesnt means they dont care, last time i checked people who care value chemistry more than comfort
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:19 AM
–

i think you should just own what makes u feel chemistry and stop caring so much about what a bunch of narcissists who are not interested in listening or interpreting ur opinions in good faith but simply "trolling" from the safety of a subreddit whose moderation is biased to let their passive aggresive behavior go unchecked under a lot of ridiculous loopholes have to say
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:16 AM
6

some people consider chemistry more important that on paper shallow compatibility 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:10 AM
2

that doesnt sounds at all, theres loads of men who dont care who still have a negative image of themselves, is like saying that if a guy had a more positive image of himself he would be more open to date fat girls my point is that caring or not caring about it has nothing to do with the image u have of urself
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:56 AM
3

my pretty cousin once said "so many uggos with the ego of a supermodel because of so many chumps who hit on anything", makes sense 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:51 AM
1

Lots of women want a guy that acts like a top who spanks her sometimes Drop the porn bro
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:50 AM
1

cuz she likes ur companionship for example, im not saying that might be the case, he is just saying it could be a chance, people who sleep around are the ones who usually follow the mentality of "have fun with someone u have chemistry in your 20s, settle down in your 30s with someone compatible", that doesnt implies the person should be someone they feel chemistry for or the best sex or whatever, just someone they enjoy having for companionship, stability, security etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:49 AM
1

the most important thing is to share their values and be attractive beyond shallow traits, it doesnt even matter if you found someone who was pressured into keeping it low as long as they re into u, it wont matter, but thats just one possibility of the many there are
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:44 AM
2

🤣🤣🤣 yeah he even wears a shirt that says "absolutely not blue pill" eh? but even if his particular case was true, it doesnt applies to the majority, but regardless, my original point is that insecurity is used by certain people as an insult, particulary towards men (speaking about sexism) otherwise, how come we dont call people who got cheated on and feel insecure in their relationships....insecure? with the same connotation? cuz definetly fit the description of what insecurity is, yet we dont, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:29 PM
2

i would say you re a minority here though, it is mostly redpillers and promiscuous women strawmanning and insulting the heck of each other
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:15 PM
3

they re just projecting their pornsick view of sex, love and relationships into those women, a woman who truly loves u (aka feels chemistry for u) wont feel like that provided you also treat her well. This also proves they have a lot of unconventional foundations for their relationships, cuz otherwise if they hadnt slept around then they wouldn "love" their current partner at all and would feel bored with them? they just different thats it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:13 PM
2

sure
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:06 PM
1

miss, alt acounts from overly invested blue pillers dont count
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:58 PM
1

objectively false, it is used as a personal attack and pretending otherwise is disingineous
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:56 PM
1

the only thing u re proving is that the correlation with narcissim does rings, but cant blame anyone for having a mental disorder, it is what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:55 PM
1

lmao so all the personal attacks and diffamations they get after they open up dont count?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:53 PM
1

look at your previous answer and you ll find the evidence 👍 being purpossefuly obtuse and inflammatory to avoid facing a point that you find uncomfortable in an overly moderated subreddit like this says it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:51 PM
2

so u discovered 1 person whose experience matches the studies, and another one who deep inside didnt care as much because he values the sexual aspect more, what does that has to do with the fact that for a lot of people the studies make no difference because they feel what they feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:50 PM
1

is pretty obvious im refering to the fact men express their emotions regarding this topic and then those same people who say men should open up proceed to contradict themselves with the way they behave and respond
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:45 PM
3

and then theres whines whenever promiscuous women are called narcissists...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:44 PM
3

im not giving them any hidden intentions, ask them and a 100% all of them will tell you they already found promiscuous women unattractive for a relationship before even reading any study, if they actually found them attractive then i can guratantee u the studies wouldnt matter,
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:34 PM
2

learn to read, im saying they dont find them emotionally rewarding, im not talking about the emotional capabilities of a slut, sluts inherently cant make them feel the emotional attraction they crave not because sluts lack emotions but because they find those women an emotional turn-off by default and nothing can change that in those guys mind unless they stop focusing on chemistry or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:31 PM
2

no u re not, u re mixing another bunch of people that have nothing to do with it, is silly to try and give them some sort of hidden pshycological intentions when they couldnt be more straightforward about the unattraction towards women with unconventional pasts
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:29 PM
-1

or you re all just being intentionally obtuse as always whenever ur cognitive dissonance is activated
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:25 PM
2

idk what u re talking about, seems like u re grouping a bunch of different people with different wants and motivations as a monolith simply because they disagree with u on something
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:23 PM
3

where did i say that promiscuous people dont have relationships? i just said that they re unconventional. is not about sluts not having emotions, i said that a serious relationships with a slut is not emotionally rewarding for many guys who value the emotional aspect, thats all, "many" doesnt means "all", as not everyone has the same motivations or desires in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:23 PM
3

i dont support hypocrites who celebrate promiscuity on men but condemn it on women
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:22 PM
2

Seen at 13:00pm\*
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:00 PM
3

if u want a *conventional marriage to last, if u have poly marriage or a marriage where cheating is allowed as long as theres no love it wont really matter or any other unconventional marriage. The problem with this subreddit is that we have a lot of people whose ideas orbit around a conventional definition of marriage, love, relationships, sex, clashing with the opposite side whose concepts regarding the same ideas are all unconventional, and they re all stating facts based on those concepts, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 04:55 PM
2

those guys just use those studies to rationalize their unattraction, but even if no studies were made they would still feel the same. Promiscuity is just not conventionally attractive emotionally speaking, no biggie there, not everyone cares about the emotional aspect though
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 04:42 PM
7

"men should be more open about their feelings" same mofos when men open up:
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 04:40 PM
3

yeah thats weird, if a woman who doesnt sleeps around also wants the same she is completely entitled to her choice,
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:45 PM
2

it is not but coincidentally promiscuous women happen to have a lot of narcissistic and bpd tendencies, pattern or coincidence? doesnt matter, the fact still stands
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:42 PM
1

not just narcissism but loads of redflags for bpd too. I dont see what self loathing guys who lament themselves have to do with anything though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 12:38 PM
1

i cannot see your point either Thats called "cognitive dissonance", look it up on google.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 08:17 AM
1

your chart doesnt proves that the conservatives had a pessimistic mood, only that liberals overrated their mood more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:30 AM
3

or the other is more neurotic than the other...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:31 PM
1

it does demonstrate my point, you just dont wanna see it and is not hard to guess why
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:29 PM
3

or maybe they are the only ones who need it, im not saying someone who isnt leftwing cant never have a mental illness, but the gap between both groups is so big is evident theres a pattern there
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:27 PM
1

you just dont wanna see it and it is obvious why, but thats another trait of narcissim i guess, cant be helped
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:25 PM
1

hey this is actually one of those rare instances where u re actually funny ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:22 PM
2

throwing unfounded remarks with the clear intention of being inflammatory isnt "responding to comments in a debate sub". Everybody knows promiscuous women are only active in this thread because it cuts deep in their narcissim, always bragging about how perfect their lives are and whatever, yet here they are trying to demonstrate random strangers that they supposedly dont care about how valid they are, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:20 PM
2

their extreme sensitivity to any sort of minor criticism for example, also your defensive behavior is funny when u re always here making loads of unfounded statements about anyone who cares, but the only difference is that i can easily demonstrate my point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:13 PM
3

except theres loads of tangible evidence lefties usually suffer from any sort of mental illness, coincidence? dont care, i just think it explains why the love reddit so much
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:12 PM
1

a simple read to all their comments on post like these, and behaviors in real life demonstrate it. She's not having sex with herself, so what's narcissistic about having sex while single and in relationships? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 08:35 PM
7

promiscuous women are so narcissistic is sickening, not even being respectful can save u from their toxicity
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:54 PM
1

crazy framing of this question, i dont think either is worthless as a human being, if u wask me which one i would rather invest emotionally, then if these were my only options i would choose a former prostitute than a former regular slut,
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:47 PM
1

mmkay, changes nothing about my statement. also this proves you re indeed the mainstream redditor
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 09:26 PM
1

yeah redditor females refers to an specific kind of woman that coincidentially uses reddit a lot since not all women use reddit, thats why u gotta make the distinction
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 09:11 PM
-2

which is what u re literally doing rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:49 PM
1

yeah the mainstream redditor is anti porn and would happily wait until marriage sure, you re just in peak denial. i mean even look at this sub, theres the bluepill which is mainstream and the redpill which is nonconformist, and the redpill subreddit is quarantined because the average redditor doesnt likes their talking points aka people like u, yet u still claim u re not the average redditor and instead act like ur narrative is nonconformist on reddit? you re in peak denial and delusion man, red…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:48 PM
1

Nothing more Redditor than someone unironically saying Lmao the redditor who spits the usual mainstream redditor beliefs is unironically saying he doesnt represents the average redditor while calling others "redditors"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 11:22 AM
-4

The fact that there are some men out there who think I'm some pure perfect tradwife because of that fact is laughable. Stop creating fake scenarios to get mad in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:24 AM
1

you really believe that out of 4 billion women in the planet are all the same? the only thing you actively see on reddit is a small fraction of another small fraction of american populace which is a fringely progressive group, not even they represent the whole culture of american women what makes you think they re representative of all women in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:22 AM
1

it is, trying to claim some sort of moral superiority about a harmless term to avoid addressing a point, just proving why trump won, but keep redditing i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:20 AM
0

yeah name calling and making snarky inflammatory remarks while hiding behind the mods when they are thrown back is such peak debating, redditors gonna reddit i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:18 AM
2

why are u here berating them and namecalling them so much if u dont care then? clearly the reaction of someone who doesnt cares
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:36 PM
1

just an overly pretentious way to avoid addresing the point
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:36 PM
2

nah is not modern women, just some narcissistic women, but to generalize all women as filling this stereotype is just closing ur mind, thats why i specifically said "reddit females"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:35 PM
0

lol yeah, i suppose the typical highschool responses being spouted accompanied by some vague sense of superirority by the so called progressive crowd dont count eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:33 PM
0

quite rich coming from a redditor like u, how about if you dislike hearing other peoples preferences then u can go somewhere where content u dont like isnt posted instead of going out of ur way to act outraged and pretend u re righteous about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:29 PM
4

mainstream women yes, reddit it women are just powerless crybullies fulfilling some sort of retribution fantasy against men they perceive as the enemy here on reddit, just like the slacktivists that plague this hellhole of a website
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:23 AM
-1

i ve seen many things but i definetly havent seen anyone calling promiscuous women "human trash" in the west at least, unless you think not considering someone "relationship material" is the same as calling them human trash.....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:18 AM
0

you do fit the reddit stereotype, is just that some dudes who arent right mentally project the notion that you re a conventional person since this is an anonymous forum, when in reality you re far from the convention they have in their mind...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:50 AM
2

is funny how reddit females show so much contenmpt and disdain for men, claim to be ultra independent and not needing men in their lives and the usual reddit narcissist mantra... but then this topic comes up and they turn full entlitled incel, clearly the reaction of someone who doesnt needs men, 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:43 AM
5

<image> Redditors ☕
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:55 PM
3

ok this one is also accuarate then <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:35 PM
4

dudes love to post a bunch of studies to justify their preference but i think even if they get debunked they still wouldnt change their mind. with that said you dont need studies when you can see full narcissism and toxicity on display on this whole thread coming from the usual suspects
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 11:49 AM
43

Reminds me of this picture: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 11:46 AM
1

lmao keep proving why people prefered trump over u, skill issue
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 06:22 PM
1

they act like that then act surprised when people prefered trump over them and still blame everyone but themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 06:19 PM
1

"But TrUmP 🤪" do you realize the world is not just american politics? trump can be whatever you want, doesnt changes the fact you re all on one of the biggest cancers of modern political discourse, you all didnt learn from previous elections and it shows
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 06:17 PM
1

average reddit lefty
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 05:04 PM
2

not even, there is a mod queue, yet somehow all the comments of the poeple who respond to his blatant rule breaking provocations get instantly enforced, but not his
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 04:10 PM
2

you re always posting blatant rule breaking content against other people withouth the rules being enforced on u? who u re trying to fool?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 04:03 PM
1

who is you all?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 ok redditor
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 03:11 PM
1

well they wouldnt date an obese woman who doesnt brush her teeth, just an average woman who loves them is enough for them. also i always find it funny how your husbands are so multifacetic, they re all always rich gigachads who at the same time hopeless romantics and ultra feminist allies and hopeless romanitcs and 7 feet and basically everything that is the topic of discussion 🤣 redditors will reddit i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 03:07 PM
5

bro, literally you and the 3 other post more and namecall on this post than the people who careee so much, who are u trying to fool? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:59 PM
1

ok alt account from one of the mods who is clearly breaking the moderator tos
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:52 PM
2

i wouldnt say desperate, they re just hopeless romantics who fall in love quite easily, too bad, they re quite lovely
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:50 PM
1

ur mom
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 02:20 PM
1

😂redditors will reddit i guess ⬆
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 01:14 PM
2

too bad, i know loads of guys who cant score who would happily date a promiscuous woman mostly cuz they would date anyone, c'est la vie
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 01:14 PM
1

if not, maybe they can shut up about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 12:28 PM
4

to all promiscuous narcissists 304s who cant shut up about this, i want to say im sorry i cant control who i feel chemistry for😬
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 12:02 PM
3

ahahah now u gonna say it is conservative, you re in hardcore denial if you claim this isnt something that progressives promote
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 07:44 PM
2

you re both really lucky,
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:08 AM
4

ahahahhaa, progressive standards and liberal privileges for me but not for thee eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:06 AM
1

tbh i dont care as long as she is egalitarian and 50/50 at the bare minimun, otherwise if i detect an ounce of traditional expectations then i refuse to compromise
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:03 AM
7

that boy was speaking facts, i would also be embarasssed if i was caught using reddit in real life 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 12:39 AM
–

he's an insecure moron and women should avoid that man at all costs. Cope and seethe, convince yourself of that if that helps you lower your blood pressure so you can sleep peacefully at night 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 01:06 AM
–

i dont recall anyone in the redpill claiming it was a conservative movement, it is only the hysterical anti redpill types who claim it is political somehow, are you living in the real world? or is your worldview about the redpill the same parroted nonsense that clueless people with a absurd worldview of the world where everything they disagree with is "conservative" in the echochambers you frequent say?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:35 AM
–

are you living in the real world?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:26 AM
–

are you living in the real world?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:26 AM
2

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:10 AM
2

what a disingenous response, if thats so why did you double down on the argument instead of calling it out since the beginning? is just funny how you all try really hard to downplay it whenever your double standards get exposed 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:55 PM
2

if you dont remember how many people you have had sexual contact with that implies you ve been with a lot, thats not something you cant simply forget unless you slept with a lot of people, no big deal though, is just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:04 PM
2

you are literally bringing up bi men in your previous response
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:59 PM
3

What standard do I have? One that actually gets sex? the one that gets you to wine and dine the mouth where 20 other men coomed in i guess, funny, loads of redditors would actually be jealous of that, to each their own. on the other hand your crusade to remark that any man who cares has a 0 count is weird, i mean, if a guy wants a woman who hasnt been on and about shouldnt he hold himself to the same standard? are you implying that that preference can only be valid if a guy has slept around? cra…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:25 PM
3

nah, loads zero count dudes are actually more lenient on women whose past highly deviates from the convention that women are on bisexual men's past
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:22 PM
4

to tell you the honest truth i dont see how that makes any difference, what an oddly specific weird statement that poster made, specially because it is a lie that they say that everytime 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:20 PM
2

lol yeah sure, making demands withouth offering anything in return is hella comfortable eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:36 PM
2

is not high but you dont remember? but anyways that isnt the point if you re an unconventional person who dates other unconventional people with unconventional wishes or priorities you might not have the same experience as others just like with the fat women who have never had "issues" with their weight or escorting example, but again, that doesnt makes being fat conventionally desirable, not to mention loads of people settle anyways, loads of men who have hired escorting can still find someone …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:28 PM
6

well you re a textbook fedora redditor so of course you would have such weird fascinations
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:26 PM
3

yeah in the arranged marriage cases is a fair point, this discussion i ve seen it thrown in circles where some women claim to be lesbian but have sex with men from time to time for the fun of it they say, or willingly slept with men in the past but got "bored" of it, the issue is not that they sleep with men, the issue is claiming to be lesbian while doing that, in any case they re bisexual, not a big deal, thats why i said bisexual "lesbian" with lesbian in quotations, they re bisexual but want…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:17 PM
9

preachy left wingers appealing to conservative gender roles to shame men into not caring is always curious ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:55 AM
2

thats not the point though, the OC just said people should be honest if asked, just like fat girls usually date other unconvetional people or have unconvetional relationships, they have no incentive to lose weight, does that means being fat is something conventionally attractive? 🤷‍♂️, i could get fat and have some cuckoldry relationship with some purple haired poly landwhale and call myself a chad about it, yet that doesnt disproves what the redpill says when it comes to men and fitness to put …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:43 AM
6

"the past is the past and it doesnt matters" the past: <image> 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:40 AM
3

is curious that lot of lesbian women think the same, they even have a term called "goldstar" for any lesbian woman who has never had any sort of intimate contact with a man and curiously enough a lot of bisexual "lesbians" give them the same slack about it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:44 PM
2

if you drop the porn and stop wanting to emulate what you see there you might find one to connect with (assuming you do)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:41 PM
11

the people obssesed with those "obssesed" with n count always remind of this whenever they start yapping: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:40 PM
2

what difference does that make? theres loads of fat fetishist around there who dont ask, they just like what they see, doesnt means being fat is something conventionally attractive, get it? also you can be catfished about BMI online and we can make the same exact parallel arguments about why it shouldnt matter, yet reality is not an opinion. So do you keep track of the number of how many escorts you’ve hired so you are prepared for when someone will ask you? I ve never hired escorts so if i get …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:35 PM
4

"if you want to date a fit woman then you should be fit yourself" sounds even more outrageous eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:27 PM
6

or a fat fuck chasing after a super model 90-60-90 woman withouth being willing to put any effort into the gym or a better diet, he can demand whatever he wants but cant blame people for finding that ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:35 PM
2

depends on how porn sick or stupid the subjects are
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:02 AM
3

i disagree, theres loads of cases where a woman is not a virgin yet that doesnt imply she followed a casual sex lifestyle
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:00 AM
4

loads of mature people do talk about it briefly , though they hold themselves to the same standard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:58 AM
6

i know a lot of fat girls who have never been rejected over their weight too.... 🤷‍♂️ i never had a woman ask me if i have hired escorting before...🤷‍♂️ and like that we can keep going and going curiously enough theres women who have asked about my number before
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:54 AM
10

the only fair argument is the one that criticizes hypocrisy, if this is important for you then you should hold yourself to the same standard, and that includes not watching porn nor wanting to imitate what you see there the rest is just pure copium and seething by insecure promiscuous people all made evident by the insults, circular logic, hypocrisy and dehumanizing intent behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:46 AM
4

any consensual sexual contact you have with someone counts. with that said for some reason it doesnt hits the same when the partners are women than when they are men, or when they were a previous marriage or serious respectful relationship. is mostly casual relationships or hookups with men that raise the most flags for whatever reason
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:41 AM
0

what you want us to even say about this? this is just circular logic, treating your girlfriend as an emotional punching bag isnt an inherent trait in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:47 AM
5

guys should just learn to differentiate when a woman truly is into them and when one is just being nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:10 AM
3

making their women submit to and depend on them. Except for these ones, the rest is the case pretty much unless you date some unconventional girl that is into poly or cuckoldry among others.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:09 AM
2

i have mixed feelings about looks tbh, on one hand the idea that looks shouldnt matter and what matters is the inside is heavily pushed, and i agree theres some validity to that notion, like looks shouldnt be the main reason why you choose someone. on the other hand it seems that women care a lot about their own looks to the point you get a contradicting message, like yeah, liking her looks is shallow, but at the same time if you dont like her looks then she wont feel okay about this, i know bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 10:03 PM
1

i suppose because porn appeals to a primal feeling in a deep way unlike movies
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:35 AM
4

i think porn consumption is heavily criticized on men more because theres this notion that only men consume porn, although that seems to be changing
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:34 AM
1

It's someone straight wanting to date someone else straight. No, straight doesnt means attracted to other straights, that just mental gymnastics to not face the fact it is blatant homophobia and hypocrisy on top of that i swear 😂 It's someone who doesn't want to date someone who pays for sex. have hired,not actively hiring, is obvious you wouldnt extend the same grace to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:38 PM
1

it the past is the past and it doesnt matter the same grace should also apply to bisexual men or men who have hired escorting before, if not then it just shows it is completely self serving
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:02 PM
–

https://preview.redd.it/wkm1gzt22h6f1.jpeg?width=698&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=61bb87bdcf571aea11a3e4506765f8ad917b5fcf Most intelligent blue pilelr
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 10:17 AM
-1

A dude who pays for sex is a loser not even on my slutty radar. Quite ironic but you do you, at the end of the day no one is entitled to be found attractive by everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 10:15 AM
0

you can be catfished about weight too through dating apps, you can still idealize that person until you find out they re fat and your feelings towards them might or might not change even though the only difference is their weight but the same platitude of them being the same exact person you were attracted to still applies, the only difference is a few more pounds of fat who really doesnt makes them a worst person or a worst partner does it? they can still be quite loving and whatever positive t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 10:07 AM
8

it doesnt makes sense to claim only fans empowers women but at the same time stigmatize the consumers, not that i agree with OF consumption but thats the point OP is making
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:57 PM
4

being in a long-term or married doesnt means you re in a conventional relationship, but like i said, just like landwhales date other fatos, the promiscuous can settle with other promiscuous in their unconventional arrangements, just like guys who have paid for encounters or OF before
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:56 PM
2

it is obvious you re using it despectively bro, who are you trying to fool?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:59 PM
3

what a dumb argument bro, you cant be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:29 PM
3

It’s a witch hunt made by insecurity trying to find justification You could use a bit of self reflection there buddy 😂 also wrong, is only straight women the ones who have hangup about it, straight men generally dont care, therefore your premise is incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:25 PM
0

atheist marry less because they dont believe in marriage in the same way religious people do not because they cant find someone or something, hence i said they cohabitate instead,
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:11 PM
6

is curious how everytime someone criticizes this preference they give the most insanely insecure lashouts, bad faith arguments and double standards ever rather than an actual argument while calling everyone else insecure, could use a bit of self reflection perhaps?. I dont see whats the deal though, collecting a lot of partners is not conventionally attractive just like being fat isnt, yet landwhales can still find partners usually with other fatos too, and someone who sleeps around doesnt reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:06 PM
2

much to your dissapointment theres loads of hypocrites around there, also i love it how you all try to imply that a guy holding himself to the same standard he wants in a partner is bad, like if somehow that preference is only valid if a dude sleeps around, see this why im not surprised people prefered trump
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:01 PM
3

assuming that ad homines fallacy is true whats the issue then? i though if a man cares about that he should hold himself to the same standard, or are you saying that n count preference is valid only if a dude slept around?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 11:58 AM
0

since when bluepill = atheism and redpill = red statest? even then atheist marry less but cohabitate instead than other people so of course they have "lower" divorce rates
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 11:57 AM
2

it is, it demonstrates that all the arguments made against why caring about it is bad are completely hypocritical and in bad faith, they dont think is wrong to care about it, they just want to eat the whole cake withouth getting fat. Is just so funny that you try to frame it as "straight people" when it is straight women the ones who take issue with bisexual men by a massive margin, while men are way more accepting of bisexuality, not only that but is also homophobic an sexist as heck, straight …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 11:48 AM
5

is not insecurity, a lot of people just dont see them as relationship material and is not really a voluntary reaction, c'est la vie
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 03:33 PM
7

for a lot of people it simply turns off the spark inside and changes their feelings and view of their partner, unless they re settling, and thats not negotiable, vague shaming attacks wont change that. I dont support hypocrites though wanting to paint it as insecurity is true insecurity 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:20 PM
2

retroactive jealousy generally seems to be an indicator of other big maturity issues Well being irrationally upset about it just because they were with someone else regardless of their circumnstances does raise concerns. My only issue is pretending that this is what most people feel, when it's clear that most adults don't consider their partner having been with someone else a dealbreaker like OP does Yeah OP statements come up as quite ambiguous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:32 AM
2

you re not criticizin the idea, you re strawmanning the person which is different, ad hominen falacies in dating denote massive insecurity. Because you go right on to say that the demands of these girls are unreasonable too. is unreasonable to believe your boyfriend doesnt loves you if he doesnt gifts you a basket every year, the same way it is unreasonable to believe wife doesnt loves you if she doesnt sleeps with you X times a year, but i dont see hows that related to wanting to be your specia…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:28 AM
1

people lie unfortunately 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:18 AM
2

though i dont care myself , i dont think caring about it is inherently inmature unless it manifests as extreme jealousy, punishing someone over it instead of walking away is definetly inmature
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:16 AM
2

entitlement: "you should accept whatever it put on the table or else you re inmature" insecurity: "how dare you care about this, why should it matter bla bla bla", thats inmature. and sure those demands are unreasonable, but holding love and intimacy to a higher standard is not, i dont support hypocrites though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:12 AM
2

He said that normal people don't want to know their partner has loved anyone else Thats a different story, in this case based on what i ve seen more men are okay with hearing about it than women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:07 AM
4

not accepting the fact that not everyone conceptualizes love the same and resorting to call them inmature out of insecurity is indeed inmature. Your point is only fair if some guy who has been on and about is upset his girlfriend is the same, thats blatant hypocrisy, but the rest is just entitlement and insecure lashouts to label someone inmature just because they consider it important.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:00 AM
6

he didnt say they most people cant accept it, he just said they rather not know, specially if they were settled for if you ask most men they would tell you they rather not know how many men their gf casually slept with or any x rated details, so in a way it supports both narratives, i ll leave it at that 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:55 AM
2

i dont think promiscuous women are more prone to a deadbedroom or settling due to something morally broken or malicious about them, i see it more a byproduct of the way they conceptualize love and relationships, though i wouldnt call them a redflag. as for the rest, i dont think a woman who waits is more of a greenflag but i do think it is worthy of praise and we all should strive to do the same, and i do think is very emotionally fulfiling and rewarding to be picked by someone like that, though…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:52 AM
6

nothing of it indicates maturity, it just indicates differences in they way the conceptualize love, wanting to paint anyone who cares an inmature however does demonstrate certain things...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:42 AM
2

just because someone has conservative attitudes in dating doesnt means they vote republican
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:59 AM
1

if that person can throw indirect attacks at people who care whats the problem if i point out it is mostly out of insecurity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:55 AM
1

it does happens, though i have only seen relationships ending over it a handful of times, the rest the guy is usually oblivious
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:19 PM
–

judgin by your obssesive activity on this kind of threads i would say you should look in the mirror if you gonna call others insecure. The only thing i agree is that if a guy wants a woman who hasnt been on and about then he should hold himself to the same standard
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:17 PM
1

i think you weight the opinion of a woman too much simply because she happens to be a woman rather than because of who she is a whole, while simultanously understimating your own too much
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:11 AM
2

i think shit gets more complicated when you get penalties for it on top that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:06 AM
1

specifically those who unironically and maliciously call others "incel"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:36 PM
7

i wouldnt call this a troll, a troll is annoying at worst and funny at best. This person however is being intentionally malicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:30 PM
2

im not cherry picking, im saying that a lot of people claiming "success" on reddit have an extremely different definition of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:28 PM
3

brother, the same way a guy who has slept with a hundred escorts isnt what you would point as an example of "succesful" in the context of what we discuss in this subreddit 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:53 AM
1

It’s a power struggle. There’s unironically power in being victims. I agree until here, the rest i recommend you not to generalize women based on what you see on reddit, reddit is a magnet of narcissistic women due to the way its uptvoting and karma system works and you shouldnt base your worldview of women based on that. as for the rest idk if it extends to goverments aid but regardless it seems some people just hate seeing men as victims maybe cuz they have the sexist belief that men should ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:40 AM
2

sounds more like reddit women, but regardless i dont even see whats the big deal here, i dont see how acknowledging in this case a guy has it worse invalidates whatever other problem a woman might face
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:24 AM
1

this is so disingenous
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:33 AM
0

people who enjoy wearing diapers and being treated as infants
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:25 AM
3

well you re not bluepill so your story might be more nuanced, these were all blue pillers
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:24 AM
5

is funny how is not a competition when it is proven men are more vulnerable in certain contexts ,so they shouldnt bring it up but instead they should shut up and take themselves by the bootstraps, but the other way around suddenly is a societal problem. but the biggest irony is that the guy is not making it a competition, he is just stating with facts that it is harder for men, why is it such a big deal to acknowledge that when thats the argument being made? gotta love how these women display th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:13 AM
11

not a redpiller but once a time i read some proud cuck calling someone else an incel and blaming his lack of romantic success on some moral shortcoming, because the cuck was 5'7 and succesfully got a relationship (im not using cuck as an insult, he literally was an open cuck who was okay watching his girlfriend being banged by some other guy) another time i also read some guy with a twink and diaper fetish claiming that he was 5'6 and succesful, but he dated femboys only. some other 5'6 guy who …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:04 AM
1

ehh not exactly, is sure being nice, specially overly as a way to make someone like you, doesnt makes you attractive. but not being nice, well it depends, theres some people who do make that an standard, but a lot of people dont seem to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:15 AM
6

i disagree, a lot of men would provide proof if avaiable. Being constantly accused and walking on eggshells all the time is another story however
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:09 AM
–

yet a lot of women try to emasculate men based on that🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:22 PM
1

https://preview.redd.it/k1rimb5ns55f1.png?width=263&format=png&auto=webp&s=576045ebb4fd674caab7a1dfa9b6269e43377897
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:20 PM
2

so much it hit home that you didnt even reply, hey thats okay though, is just silly to act like you have some sort of moral high ground here or something 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 04:58 PM
–

correct me if im wrong, but the narrative i have heard is not "be nice and you ll get a girlfriend", is more like "if you re not nice you ll never be loved" and you see that rethoric being indirectly repeated in the sub assuming that some guy's loneliness is a punishment for not being nice, obviously this have been proven wrong many times already to many guys specially in their younger years when their minds are the most vulnerable so obviuosly thats quite a shock specially when straight men's w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:51 PM
2

you literally feel extremely insulted over someone saying you re not relationship material for sleeping around, not because someone questions just rights or dignity as a human being, no, just because someones says you re not relationship material over a trait they consider undesirable, and the fact you supposedly have been married for 25 years just makes it even worse, like why are you trying to prove yourself to anonymous online strangers that you consider irrelevant incels then? who are you to…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:46 PM
5

you literally say that serial killers are kind and of better character in another thread, yeah murdering random people, kids included is so charming, all this just because you dont want to agree with the point of the original commenter cuz you know it is a fair one😂 cognitive dissonance is one hell of a drug.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:41 PM
2

so all of this is because your ego feels hurt about it, okay thats fine, but theres a difference between saying your opinions are invalid because you re not relationship material, or that you re a lesser person because you re not relationship material or thats some sort of punishment for your opinions or difamating you over it, vs someone simply stating that you women who sleep around arent relationship material because they genuinely believe that. men are simple creatures who do the second, wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:35 PM
0

people like you is why im not surprised that trump won
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:29 PM
6

so you think that psychopaths who commit murders for the fun of it, rob families of their loved ones and sexually abuse their victims, many times children included, are better people than people who complain or are obtuse simply because they re charming, intelligent and introspective? if thats so i dont see how your opinion has any worth here, people like you is why im not surprised that trump won
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:23 PM
2

not directed at anyone in particular but most of these people purppose is simply to be contrarian and socially violent to anyone they perceive out of their dogma, although the Original commenter you re talking to doesnt believes incels have high standards i think
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:18 PM
2

i know he said that, but fortunately nobody gets the right to rape anyone just for being a virgin, however women do get a lot of lenience to be socially violent to men for way less. funny how you ignored the rest of the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:14 PM
2

saying "women who sleep around (or sluts if we want to make it a bit easier to relate) arent relationship material" is controversial, not intrinsically insulting or inflammatory. saying "women are whores who belong to the kitchen" is indeed an inflammatory and sexist remark, not just something plainly controversial, get the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:11 PM
2

where do men get to commit rape if someone calls them a virgin? last time i checked doing that gets a man prison time, whereas a women saying the most outrageous shit about men for something that happened to her gets...nothing? Some people certainly do, that's true, just as some people call those who use virgin as an insult "sexist, misandrist, etc". not true, in real life the kind of sexist insults women thrown at men doint face even a quarter of the backlash that the ones men throw at women fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:06 PM
2

lol, you re saying women say that to make them feel insulted but now you re saying is not really an insult? thats just not an insult, thats straight up social-violence. but im gonna reverse it, why according to you? thats okay and why thats not an insult?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:01 PM
1

not the same, women who throw those insults use it in a dehumanizing and bigoted way and they recevie applauses for it men dont call women "fat" or "old" just because they disagree on something and even then they face harsh social penalties for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:54 PM
1

it is, we call men who say those things "sexists, mysoginists, evil" etc, we dismiss them, we dehumanize them, whereas the opposite when it comes from women is socially applauded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:52 PM
2

much anything about them they endure from the manosphere, red pillers, incels, etc? you say it like if those things where seen as socially acceptable, besides they dont even work under the same fundaments, none of those thing you mentioned exist to purposefully offend women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:49 PM
2

i would say sexist, but if we appeal to the broad definition they make of "misogyny", then yes, it would make them misandristic
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:45 PM
3

no, im asking why women can throw sexist insults at men while men get morally reprehended for it even when the women are the active perpetrators? besides, a guy doesnt needs to insult women as a whole, he just has to say something controversial for it to happen, there is a huge fundamental difference in the way those insults are framed
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:36 PM
2

but they arent insulting women as a whole, they re just expressing that they find women who sleep around unnattractive for anything serious, men dont say that to annoy women, labelling it as an insult just because some women might be personally offended about doesnt makes it the same,
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:34 PM
1

then how come the insults women thrown at men arent policed the same way mens' are?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:21 PM
4

not true, you dont need to say something offensive, just something that causes disagreement to be met with said ad hominens.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:19 PM
8

saying that grants you penalties though, whereas personally attacking men gets you brownie points
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:17 PM
–

ahahaha based on what? because i said something that triggers your cognitive dissonance? people like you is exactly why im not surprised that trump won
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:29 AM
–

Or he's not nice himself, only pretends to be nice because she's attractive. Yes yes, it is impossible for a guy to be nice and not be succesful at dating, didnt you know that not getting pussy is a punishment from God himself for failing to be an exemplary christian and not cattering to the whims of chronically online narcissistic reddit feminist? see the key solve the male loneliness crisis is to call trump bad and that way every guy will instantly get a girlfriend for being such a daring and …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 07:24 PM
6

women see men who want them for sex the same way men see women who want them for money so again, do you consdier women who only want you for money attracted to you even if they sleep with you for monetary gain?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 02:42 PM
3

do you consider women who only want you for your money attracted to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 02:35 PM
1

wouldnt it be more logical to simply date a man who shows effort after getting to know you properly and not from the get go?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 09:48 AM
5

correction* men who chase after slutty women, and plain and simply is because they perceive those women as more accesible for uncommited sexual relationships, i think what the OP wanted to say is that a lot of men chase after women who they find easy not because they find them particulary more attractive than other women, more like among all the women they find attractive thats the one that serves their purppose. unless you want to argue that if a man only wants a woman for a sexual relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 09:46 AM
1

not true at all, men have to bring more to the table than just not looking like a bridge troll if they want a woman who at least meets the bare minimun. then who are these women dating? a nice guy chump who treats her nice even though she is not really satisfied by him but at least she gets companionship 🤷‍♂️, if you think about it, they might get decent guys, but that doesnt implies they re decent themselves 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 07:55 AM
–

yeah i guess far left guys who make politics their identity and cant see the nuance of the world beyond their black or white troglodytic though process would think a woman who refuses to put out is an action of political extremism
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 08:20 PM
–

i think you have a pretty distorted view of what conservative means 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 08:13 PM
–

this regressive eugenic views on politics should stop already, it just dumbs down discourse to a cringe american high school mean girl drama
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:21 PM
–

to tell you the truth i ve never met a far right extremist woman at all,, (and to be fair neither a man) nor i have even heard about the existence of one but i do have seen a few male far right extremists on the news, so i dont even think this would be common if even if it was desired at all, and sure many far right extremists are in relationships or married, but their partners dont have any political opinions at all, they re just there
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:17 PM
–

it seems that a lot if guys do not want far right women because they have to wait till marriage for sex. bruh you have a really reddit definition of what far right means🤦‍♂️.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:14 PM
–

you say it like if wanting to be seen as the best was something to feel shameful about, besides you re extremely out of touch if you think only men are concerned with this. sounds to me like you just want to be contrarian to "the men here"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:33 AM
–

18. Would you date a woman who believes it's a woman's job to stay home and raise the kids? im not sure, i think both parents should raise the kids 19. Would you date a woman who is a practicing Muslim? yes, why not? 20. Would you date a woman who identifies as bisexual? sure, i find that irrelevant 21. Would you date a woman with a tattoo sleeve? depends 22. Would you date a woman that frequently swears like a sailor? both men and women who do this are tasteless so no 23. Would you date a woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:28 AM
–

1. Would you date a woman who uses cocaine at least once a month? no 2. Would you date a woman who doesn't like drinking alcohol? yes 3. Would you date a woman who doesn't like doing physical activity? depends on how out of shape she is 4. Would you date a woman who voted for Donald Trump? dont care 5. Would you date a woman who voted for Kamala Harris? dont care unless she makes it part of her identity, curiously enough that seems to be quite common 6. Would you date a woman who openly dislikes…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:27 AM
1

i disagree, if a woman cheats she is not really into her partner
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:05 AM
7

i dont think basing your world view of women based on a fringe post of a single kind of woman on reddit of all places is a good idea my friend
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:52 AM
3

he didnt mention anything about virginity.... but if we gonna go that route then just look at tim tebow and his wife, it is definetly working for his wife. also what makes you think that a guy will love a woman just because she happens to be famous? shouldnt that ring a bell that maybe those things dont really matter a lot for men to truly love a woman like them guys have been saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:47 AM
2

based on what i ve seen women cheat simply because they re not into their partner anymore (or never were to begin with but saw them as a good stable option for a relationship)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:41 AM
3

maybe date someone because of their good character qualities rather than because they happen to fit some shallow inconsequential standard?, im not saying "date ugly guys" im just saying dont date someone just because they happen have a lot of shallow traits you like that mean jack nothing for a relationship, just because some guy is charismatic or popular or rich or good looking or whatever doesnt makes him a good boyfriend or person. Also dont act like a narcissist in dating and maybe you wont …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:34 AM
1

bro and i though being chronically was something only men could dominate, but i see you broke that glass ceiling, not even maga conspiracy theories are this level of insane
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:14 AM
2

this is the most reddit comment i ever read, people like you is why it doesnt surprises me that trump won, keep it up, im sure attacking your political oposition based on some fringe apolitical posts about dating from people all over the world with different stories and motivations on forums on an app known for being full of nerds and degenerates will definetly not turn even more people away from your cause, keep it up 👍🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:34 PM
13

any woman who doesnt looks like a bridge troll can get a decent husband easily. ( and the bar to be considered a bridge troll is quite high)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 11:24 PM
–

even more bold of you to presume OP is a man and that he genuinely believes this i see why reddit was chosen as the main place to test ai bots considering how gullible left wing redditoids can be
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:53 AM
1

your past Also funny how you wont address the rest of my comment, silence is a reply on its own
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:08 PM
2

I'm not trying to meet online strangers preferences. That's weird. is not about you trying to meet their preferences, you dont need to want someone to be offended by what they say, and in this case trying to paint as insecure or losers or whatever clearly shows it triggers your insecurities, why? cuz theres nothing wrong with that preference, therefore painting them as this strawman you made out of them in your head makes it easier to deal with it cuz that way it irks less, is just like those wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 09:01 PM
3

sure it is, nothing screams "im so secure of myself" like trying to put down someone simply cuz you dont meet their preferences, you cannot even point out whats exactly wrong with their preference because you know theres nothing wrong with it so thats why you have to resort to insult them 😂 you exude the same energy as those "nice" guys who insult women who reject them, only difference is that at least they dont act righteous about it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:48 PM
4

It shows the wind is blowing towards losers having insecurities and obsessing over nonsense. this is what a totally secure of herself person would say 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:27 PM
2

validation, they need validation, nothing else really
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:26 PM
16

what do women people have to gain from it by "lying"? same reason a lot of people claim looks dont matter or "what matters is the inside 🌈" or beauty at every size or the past doesnt matter bla bla bla, is not about deceiving anyone, is just the politically correct thing to say
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:13 PM
-1

2-3 might be low at 30 but it is already too much for someone who hasnt even reached driving age😂 girls in your school were still virgins Sorry, "virgins" who have given head before dont count
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 06:26 AM
2

not really, most of them have admitted they would happily marry a widow, so is not about just having had a penis inside her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:31 PM
1

but most of the times they arent educated nor overly liberal nor making a lot of money. Do you guys like those would even have any succes in conservative societies? no, they resort to prostitution instead (if legal)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:25 PM
1

is not always hookups, many times it is just casual relationships for fun, they re not always model looking ,sure they arent ogres but they arent magazine looking guys, and many times they can be bums, party dealers, fun guys who rather skip school etc, not necessarily educated liberal guys who earn a lot of money
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:18 PM
2

yeah thats what they want for settling down, but until then a lot of the men they sleep with dont even meet a fraction of those standards except for looks maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 03:37 PM
2

im saying that you can find way more women with high standards in conservative areas than it progressive areas, in progressive areas theres way more women with lax standards
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 03:24 PM
2

in my experience women tend to have the lowest standards is in places where the sexual revolution had the most influence, then a weird mix happen where both sides were equally strong, and finally women tend to have the highest standards in places where the influence of the SE was minimal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 03:06 PM
-4

Former frat boys settling down with the ‘nice Christian girl’ happens all the time too The nice "christian" girl who thinks ass and mouth dont count?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:57 PM
2

point out that promiscuous women have no trouble settling with a low N Isnt this just the stereotypical settle down nice guy chump relationship that has always been happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:44 PM
4

people just went from one extreme another, i wouldnt blame the male loneliness crisis on that though, even in places where conservative values regarding sexuality are still strong men can experience loneliness too if they re not up to the test i would say the sexual revolution actually lead to a lot of mediocre men that the most they could aspire in the good old days is paying for it, getting a piece of the cake in modern times too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:35 PM
0

well it might not be the same for everyone, but at a very young age i moved to a very "progressive" place and a lot of young girls already had an embarrassing history before even reaching driving age, even many who didnt give that vibe, so yeah, sometimes that train doesnt even has a stop near you if thats what you want .
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:31 PM
2

never seen those guys claiming that it is about values, i ve only heard them saying it is just an emotional turn-off for a romantic relationship more than preaching or moral code, the other stuff they say about promiscuous women supposedly being more likely to cheat n stuff is just attempts at rationalization on their part, also their desire for being promiscuous comes more from a point of some perceived status boost of men who can afford to be promiscuous (in places where women sleeping around …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:21 PM
1

if he isnt willing to start something serious with her then i wont believe whatever word comes out of his mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:55 PM
1

sometimes because the guy wants to feel powerful and it’s all about validation The majority of men who chase casual sex do so for validation 🤷‍♂️, if you have done casual sex before then you have slept with a man like that at least once 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 05:00 AM
1

im not opening my heart nor emotionally to a woman who opens up to men like those🤷‍♂️ besides now you re moving the goalpost to what a commodity cuz otherwise how else can you strawman me?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:30 AM
1

yes, yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an incel nazi tate fan phobe racist redpill mysoginist <image> now lets move the goalpost to what a commodity is cuz otherwise how else can you strawman me? i dont care why the woman consented, the mere fact that she consented is enough to give a hard pass, specially if she gets an ego boost from that, who would open up their heart to someone who gets an ego boost from sleeping with strangers who just wanted her for a few nights and wouldnt even be able…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:13 AM
1

Kinda sounds like you view sex as a commodity. I was about to reply to you in good faith but you just keep proving why trump won
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:49 AM
0

sorry man i dont get what you re trying to say, what you say about labour is a more complex issue that i dont really see what relevance it has to the argument, what is being taken from you just because someone, in this case a woman, choses no to date you?🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 03:51 PM
0

“I don’t like their tone so fuck due process I don’t need rights!” nah, they just dont wanna listen to you, because why would they if you gonna attribute the worst intentions to them possible just because they disagree with you? You didn’t answer why you assumed that casual sex is automatically about a man dehumanizing a woman Because he just wants her for her body and for pleasure and she happens the be the path of least resistance? dehumanizing is a strong word though, he just wants her for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:48 AM
-2

nah is not about you being a slut, everybody might have their own opinion about it but at the end of the day it is just an opinion. it is about your dishonest and hysterical bad faith way of arguing which doesnt surprises me why people prefered trump over you 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:40 AM
-5

Or that’s how YOU see women If you see a guy who is dating an obvious gold digger and she is only with him for money, is it unreasonable to say he is being used? in this case for money?? is it unreseanoble to say she just sees him as a paypig or a cashcow or a personal atm? acknowledging that means you re dehumanizing him or that you share the same views as her? these kind of bad faith arguments and projections is exactly why you re all disliked by many. People like you is exactly why im not sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:55 AM
0

i guess the logic is that you dont need a relationship to survive therefore theres nothing you that you re entitled there, unlike a job and some other essential things
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:52 AM
0

it is assumed that the guys who slept with them only wanted them for a night and saw them as just another body to release in, but whenever it comes to serious relationships and responsibilities they would be the first one to bail out. And for many guys (or at least the one who think that) it is an extremely hearthbreaking sensation to find out that the girl they consider special consented to be just another ego lay of some guy who probably wouldnt even put any effort for her, it just doesnt feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:49 AM
2

i dont know about the ones of trying to sleep with you right away, but the ones about partner number i doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:46 AM
0

below average men who are single dads?🤔 that doesnt computes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:41 AM
0

idk? whoever you want, im just saying the guys you re going after arent the same ones who say "nobody wants me"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:38 AM
-2

bro is arguing with ghosts
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:37 AM
1

by definition they arent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:36 AM
3

no, it is because men just take it to the chin and accept it as it is
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:34 AM
–

i dont think the men you re chasing after are the ones who say no one wants them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:32 AM
1

and you re just a keyboard crybully😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 01:25 AM
2

think you’re having a completely separate conversation with yourself, hope you enjoy yourself cause your reply makes no sense in relation to mine Keep deflecting. It’s also taken you hours to come back at me with your nonsensical response. Oh yeah sure is not like i have responsibilities to take care of outside of online discussions, what an unemployed ass response, dont project your chronically online behavior on people who disagree with you. most reddit response of the whole thread ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:22 PM
1

what are you talking about? you re just talking out of your ass, even high school mean girls can make more resonating statements than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:20 PM
1

good thing im not talking about your ability to get partners (as if that was difficult anyways if you live in a progrossive porn-rotten culture) but the fact thats the first thing your mind jumps to proves theres an irk there, go to therapy so you can cure that narcissism
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:24 PM
2

learn to be comfortable on your own skin so nobody can trigger such insecure responses over something as asinine as rejecting you over your sexual past, it ll do you good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:18 PM
2

criticizing someone or feeling dislike for what they do doesnt means you re making it about yourself or that you re overly invested, again this is plain narcissism, much to your dissapointment people can dissaprove of you withouth them being this parody you make out of them to protect your ego
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:10 PM
2

this is just narcissist logic, someone can casually criticize you or casually form opinions about you withouth being overly invested in your life, much to your dissapointment
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:06 PM
2

thats now what maddona whore complex is. maddona-whore complex is guys who cant desire the women they marry cuz they see them as pure untochable beings, but the women they see as whores are the ones who trigger their sexual desire and that also includes prostitutes. in this case those guys just want an ego boost.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:00 PM
2

Curious how the goalpost moved from "these guys want women to lower their standards and date evil men" to "not all women are shallow", just another way of unintenionally admitting you were strawmaning them ☕
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 07:55 PM
4

HAHAHA 😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 07:52 PM
5

so you agree you were strawmaning their position then, good
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 02:52 PM
–

they mean shallow standards like height, income, looks, popularity etc, nothing about respect or being good. Either you re extremely dense or you re just being disingenous cuz this is a blatant strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:38 PM
13

similarly an incel saying how he wants to assault his female coworkers and enslave all women may radicalize a woman Realistically speaking how common is this way of thinking even? most of the common misandry women throw is based on the men they date, not on the shut-in incels they dont even know exist, you have to be chronically online and go way out of your way to even run into someone who holds those sorts of beliefs (cuz they only live in extremely fringe corners of the internet and in real l…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:45 PM
–

so according to you a guys who doesnt sleeps around is low-status because...(?), such a high IQ logic right there😂, let me guess, you re a leftoid? not hard to guess. i dont agree with insulting people you reject but much to your delusion loads of people who do that arent low status as unfair as it sounds, c'est la vie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 03:06 PM
17

theres a shortage of **ATTRACTIVE*\* relationship material men, theres plenty of guys who would be good boyfriends or husbands, but the harsh truth is they arent attractive enough (at least until a woman is on settle down mode) On the other hand just being as loyal as your options isnt something to admire or compesating your lack of attractiveness with "nice" behavior is not true niceness even if you would be a good boyfriend nevertheless. finally, being a good boyfriend/husband doesnt implies y…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:02 PM
1

cuz when people say women who end up with abusers are dumb they dont mean women who need men out of survival. those women needed those men because they had no safety net whatsoever, same goes for women who live in places where they have less rights than men, they do elicit simpathy, however women who give an ego boost to abusers simply because "he was hot😭" or "he was so charming😭" are the ones who are hard to feel sorry for, dont get me wrong, abusers are still abusers and guilty as charged, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 07:35 AM
2

they got in out of economical need, not because there was something particulary "charming" or "intriguing" about those guys
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:48 PM
2

Has anyone close to you ever been in an abusive relationship? Not close but relatives, stayed simply because they depended economically on their abuser, the moment they got a safety net they dumped them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:39 PM
2

next thing you gonna say is that fit guys who dont wanna date landwhales are insecure too. Heres a harsh truth, not everyone whose preferences exclude you is secretly a low status person, and having preferences that exclude you isnt a crime or a moral shortcoming, deal with it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:26 PM
5

crazy how much some people need to convince themselves that anyone who has preferences that exclude them are secretly undesirable or msierable whatever, like does it disturbs your sleep so much that someone whose preferences exclude isnt some antisocial shut-in fatty doritos chomper?😂😂 get therapy. As long as theres respect, no hypocrisy and graceful criticism date whoever you want
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:24 PM
1

except for economical abusers, they are, the majority of women who end up with those kind of men do so because of shallow standards, they choose a guy based on shallow stuff rather than actual meaningful character, dont get me wrong, abusers are pieces of shit, but theres really nothing people can do for you if thats what you open yourself to (unless they cross the legal line). just dont throw graceless generalizations towards men after due to your own bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:17 PM
2

those kind of abusers dont prey on anyone, they just hit their shots and anyone dumb enough to tolerate their bullshit are the ones they end up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:07 PM
2

is like those people (or women) who wont date a guy who doesnt insist after rejection "if doesnt insist after i rejected him then he truly didnt want me so nothing lost", grats, thats the fastest way to end up with someone who cant take a "no" for an answer although in the case you mentioned it is more shallow
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:04 PM
3

the mainstream definition of incel changed long ago, stop being disingenous specially when you come from the same crowd who throws that slur to anyone who disagrees with you regardless of wether they re celibate or not
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:00 PM
3

im not using incel in the original meaning of being celibate or not but the new mainstream one of being a hateful, insecure narcissistic entitled person, so yes. female incels are surprisingly common
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:38 PM
3

it is, straight doesnt means "attracted to other straights" straight means "attracted to the opposite sex", therefore the only basis a straight woman has to reject a bisexual man over the fact that he is bisexual is homophobia plain and simple
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:45 AM
3

and an homophobe too🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:32 AM
3

but the majority are perfectly okay with it, because straight = attraction to the opposite sex if you re straight woman that means you re attracted to men bisexual men are still men ergo if you refuse to date them because they are bisexual then you re plain bigoted and homophobic, dont get me wrong, if you dont want to date them it is absolutely your choice, but who are you to chastise and shame men over caring about a potential lifepartner's past when you are throwing rocks from a glass house? …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:20 AM
3

so by your insane logic straight men who date bisexual women arent straight?😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:07 AM
7

loads of people see it as a low status symbol: "loser who has to pay for a woman to want to open herself to him" theres some people who legitimately think it is about sexual objectification but for the majority is just a way to masquerade their sexist views of men being more or less worthless based on how much sexual attention they get from women, otherwise they would criticize casual sex too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:04 AM
1

you re just projecting your porn rotten view of sex on people who care, for the majority who care it is about the emotional aspect not about performance, otherwise they would also feel those insecurities you mention when it comes to hookups but that doesnt happens
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:00 AM
7

"we re all entitled to our deal breakers" look at all of those insecure entitled women on the comments😂 this whole discussion really proves female incels do exist
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:57 AM
5

impressive mental gymnastics to whitewash homophobia, as if bisexual men werent real men or something
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:54 AM
1

the right pushed against the part of DEI called affirmative action, not diversity per se.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 03:32 PM
0

and this changes what? my point still stands
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 10:35 PM
1

nah that just makes you basic, generic and shallow wether you re a man or a woman, but at least men take it to the chin
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:41 PM
2

men who do that arent respected or praised, in fact they face a lot of criticism and shame, i see the problem, you guys also want to act like the most degenerate of men but withouth dealing with the baggage that comes with it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:21 PM
–

not true, the right just pushed back against the left rethoric of "gender is a social construct" or DEI and affirmative action, but they dont oppose POC or LGTB having human rights,, however you dont need to fit a particular identity to be right-wing, thats why you can find loads of atheist right wing, gay right wing, pro-migration right wing, gun control right-wing, pro-abortion right wing , in fact right wing is not even an identity, thats why loads of right wing also jumped the JD Vance baby …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:12 PM
12

identity politics is among the biggest cancers that plagues the left imo
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 08:11 PM
1

i read once that supposedly brad pitt wasnt able to pull anything before becoming famous in LA, supposedly he worked as the chicken mascot of a restaurant, kinda relates to what you re saying, nvm i dont think it is true. How do you explain it when it doesnt involves celebrities though?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:56 PM
6

i mean it is true that if you act like a raging mysoginist that even the taliban would be concerned then you wont have any succes in dating and tbh you wont have any male friends neither, but thats an strawman, in reality something as not having good enough social skills can be enough for you to not be succesful no matter how much of a nice person you are, the fact that these guys always end up in the friendzone proves that the argument of them being bad people and women supposedly being able to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:53 PM
2

what kind of person?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:09 PM
14

is just like those boomers who claim we live in a meritocracy and think homeless or people who struggle paycheck to paycheck are secretly lazy and thats why they deserve poverty, maybe if we lived in the extremely wealthy times where employers would hire anyone for a pulse they were lucky enough to be born at i would agree, but nowadays job market is shit, house market is shit, employers are shit, the dollar value is shit, nepotism is real and people end up homeless trying to pay their medical c…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:06 PM
0

didnt brad pitt struggle to pull in LA before he became famous?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:02 PM
4

why arent you fellas keen on paying for prostitution if it is about sex and you dont get any emotional fulfillment from it then? or visiting a strip club?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 12:51 PM
15

basically attraction isnt negotiable, a man cant convince someone to find him sexually desireable just by being overly nice to them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:49 AM
-5

if you re a man, looks might get you access to the bottom 80%, but personality is what will get you access to the top 20%, unless you re okay with dating shallow women who wont make you emotionally fulfilled i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:48 AM
7

redpillers are in charge of my country right now Sorry man but you clearly have an extremely bastardized view of what redpill or the topic of the subreddit is if you think this is even a possibility, politics have nothing to do with it but job seekers couldn't really ignore the statement when boomers were the vast majority of people hiring for jobs while saying it. It is an out of touch statement because job applications are done online, going in person will just get you blacklisted at worst and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 10:06 PM
21

i dont even see why redpillers care so much what chronically online reddit feminists have to say, like if redpillers say the redpill has been proven right countless times what does it matter what some 40+ chronically online woman with nothing better to do than to "own" online anonymous profiles to get over the resenment she has for the assholes she willingly dated matters? for every reddit woman that jerk herself off with her revenge fantasy about the male loneliness crisis supposedly being some…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 11:26 AM
1

It’s so bizarre to me, seriously. If OP is truly so confident in his relationship, then why waste time online talking about “if you hate my relationship, you’re a jaded old woman!” Perhaps for the same reason a lot of high body count and casual sex women cant stop talking about the 666 chads they married and try to paint guys who care as incels, mysoginist, bitter, virgins etc in the subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:30 PM
0

so you think they are pathethic simply because they care about that, who is the triggered one again?🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:01 PM
0

false, it is actually the most functional choice you can make unless you end up with a shitty person in which case is better to split from them, but thats why choosing better is equally important.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 04:59 PM
1

"dont care" yeah your responses really prove you truly dont care right there buddy. "people pointed out" you mean you are trying to desperately trying to make it seem like that because you re in hardcore denial because you cant accept that that your own garbage also stinks, keep crying man, for every insecure dude in the sub theres an equally insecure woman, getting all this touched up because someone points that out just proves you re in denial. pd: Bro is an expert in keyboardwarriorism but ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 04:55 PM
5

pointing out that theres a lot of insecure women in the subreddit isnt bait😂, why does it bothers you so much when someone points that out🤔? get a grip man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 03:25 PM
1

"anyone who disagrees with me is a troll" whatever you say my little chronically online redditard friend👍
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 03:14 PM
5

you told me to look at the other posts didnt you ? 🤷‍♂️, you really should stop participating in this subreddit, it looks like it is affecting you negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 03:06 PM
5

your post history proves you do have a personal grudge there man, no big deal though, you do as you please with your time but imo is a waste, i dont have a horse in that race, and you getting so touchy because i also pointed up that theres a lot of insecure women there followed by your ridiculous 12yo replies just proves it, but like i said, we all have insecurities, no human being is free from them👍
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 03:02 PM
1

say whatever you want, that doesnt changes the fact that for every insecure guy you re throwing hate here theres an equally insecure woman bitching about it, im sorry your football team aint perfect, you getting this touchy about it and posting replies that would make even a 13 yo edgelord look mature just prove my point 👍 not a big deal anyways, having insecurities isnt a crime is it? we all have some
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:54 PM
3

i figure your wife is also promiscuous and thats why you also cant stop bitching on these threads towards anonymous online profiles? hey im sorry that random online comments from anonymous profiles make you feel buyers remorse man😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:48 PM
3

"anyone who disagrees with me is baiting", let me guess, you also think rocket man is bad and january 6th was worst than 9/11😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:42 PM
5

thats completely unnecessary but you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:39 PM
5

mostly because the kind of women who care arent redditards so they dont use reddit and also because they dont face backlash for it since men just take it to the chin rather than bitching about it, so thats why you dont see them talking about it, cuz everybody accepts it as it is, if they faced the same backlash the men face you would see more talk about it and also if they were also weirdos who use reddit 🤷‍♂️😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:39 PM
5

followed by a bunch of insecure women who cant stop bitching about it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:35 PM
8

curious how these topic always trigger the worst insecure responses in redditoid women, imo just date whoever you want, as long as you re not hypocritical (contrary to popular belief around here, a lot of women absolutely do care about a man's past too and would never date a man-hoe and many self proclaimed progrossives also have very hypocritical standards regarding a man's past) and you respect the rights of those who dont meet your standards anyone who takes issue or namecalls is just showing…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 11:32 AM
–

Also, you and almost every man here know I’m right. The shame is designed to funnel women towards inexperienced men. sure, they re also eating the pets and poisoning our wells and turning the frogs gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:33 PM
2

no you havent understood anything, conservatives dont care if you follow their ideas for the sake of conservativism, conservatives say stuff like "dont drugs" not because they think people who do drugs arent conservative enough but because they think drugs will drive you through a bad path, if you ignore that warning however and end up as a zombie junkie in the street just because you wanted to be one of the rebellious cool kids then deal with it yourself rather than negging others who already h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:22 PM
-1

wtf does this has to do with anything? dont date men you find undesirable if you find them so damn undesirable, i dont know why you need online strangers permission for that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:12 PM
2

is letting people deal with the outcomes of their own well informed actions a punishment though? if i drive drunk and i crash my own car which in consequence means i wont be able to get to my job the day after and i get fired, should people have the moral obligation to bail me out even though i knew drinking and driving is a reckless action? if i excessively drink to the point my liver and kidneys get destroyed are people obliged to pay me an organ transplant otherwise im being punished? it seem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:43 PM
-3

this shit does happens, might not be widespread in the whole country but it does happens often enough to be noticed
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:40 PM
–

serious question, why do you all go so out of your way to act outraged about what some people say on this subreddit rather than actually challenging their view? do you all need validation so damn bad that you all have to make these nonsensical strawmen just so you all can sleep peacefully at night? Downvotes with no argument prove i hit the bullseye 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:38 PM
4

because choose better and "women are too picky" arent contradictory in any way, since they arent refering to personality standards but rather shallow inconsequential stuff like height, income, looks or humour, hobbies, popularity etc, thats what guys who complain about women standards being too high mean, is not about personality traits, is not about "date an asshole who doesnt even puts effort", ironically when they say choose better they also mean to not choose guys like those no matter how ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:40 PM
1

choose better and "women are too picky" arent contradictory in any way, since they arent refering to personality standards but rather shallow inconsequential stuff like height, income, looks or humour etc, thats what guys who complain about women standards being too high mean, is not about "date an asshole who doesnt even puts effort", ironically when they say choose better they also mean to not choose guys like those no matter how tall or good looking or rich they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:35 PM
2

solipsims is to think that politics actually matter in casual sex and that anyone who has different politics to you is some sad lonely virgin guy or whatever strawman you imagine them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:17 PM
2

your solipsism is showing if you think matter in the dating, speciall casual sex world, and that you also think sleeping around is a priority for the OC.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 10:28 PM
1

with such alienating chronically online narratives you make about people it shouldnt be surprising to you all why trump won.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 10:14 PM
1

Good husbands will do this to because they care about their partners good husbands dump their wives to dont get them pregnant, how ridiculous, with such alienating takes are you all really suprised trump has such a strong support?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 10:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter