TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PVS3 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by PVS3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do this TODAY: 1) Call your doctor and ask him to refer you to a therapist for depression. I 100% garuntee that any competent doctor will be completely nonjudgemental on this. If you do nothing else, put that doctor's name and number in your phone, along with the suicide hotline in your country. 2) Call the therapist and make an appointment. It will be an easy call. They won't ask many questions until you are in the office. 3) Tell your wife you are depressed. This is the hard one, but also the …
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:33 PM
0

I'm not defending Milo, or the DSM for that matter. I was simply restating his position for the poster, to explain why people claim he's transphobic.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:07 PM
5

Caveat: My prior post makes him sound very reasonable - he is also a professional troll. He enjoys being condescending and patronizing to his opponents to get them riled up.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:57 PM
6

He's made the (somewhat reasonable) argument that it is a form of mental illness to believe you are actually another gender. Just as it is a mental illness to believe you are actually a cat, or an alien, or Napoleon Bonaparte, etc. The term I've heard used is dysmorphia, but i'm not an expert. Essentially his point is this - by treating people with a mental illness like it's just a perfectly normal lifestyle we are doing them a great disservice. This is a subgroup of humanity with massively hire…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:55 PM
1

Most of the reason Reddit hates on cops can be found in the margin between "We had a good reason" and "we had legal authority" And no, I'm not convinced that I need (or care) to know why they thought there was a good reason to break the law. They had a better reason not to: the rules outlined in our foundational documents governing the limits on state authority say they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:54 PM
1

You described one scenario where the police failed to act despite being faced with clear an compelling evidence of a crime, and another where the victim was a minor. While they are both horrible stories that tug at the heartstrings. neither is very relavent here. Ignore the gender thing for a moment if that bothers you. As a society, we can't hold both of the following statements to be true: 1) As an adult, you are capable of having agency over your own life, including the ability (and authority…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:02 PM
1

Yes... and that changes the situation how? <\snark> In all seriousness, the woman in question (an in your hypothetical) is an adult. That means they are capable of making their own choices, and should be allowed to bear the outcomes. If she says there is no need to be concerned, then that is her choice. To assume differently robs her of independence. honestly, I don't quite grasp how any other choice is not seen as demeaning to the woman. "I know you THINK you're alright little lady, but just le…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:40 PM
24

That would be the case if you had NOT answered the door and assured them that you were 1) alone. 2) uninjured and 3) had not been the victim of an assault. This needs to be documented via a complaint.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:42 PM
35

Armed men burst into an innocent woman's home and refused to leave. Story at 11.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:39 PM
6

Sounds like something that should be forwarded to the local bar ethics board.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:43 PM
2

The fallacy here is that when we are discussing "rape" in the abstract, we end up assuming the worst-case scenario of a premeditated violent crime by an unknown assailant against a literally innocent woman. That is the mindset used when chastising someone for pointing out that a woman who has 8 beers and goes up to a guy's room willingly may have acted irresponsibly, and we should teach our daughters to make smarter decisions regarding their own safety - we are seen as defending the abstract vio…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:32 AM
12

he "Servicemembers Civil Relief Act." It says, "In an action covered by this section in which the defendant is in military service, the court shall grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days..." But circuit court judge Margaret Noe in Michigan denied that protection for Hindes. How the Hell can this be legal? Judges have immunity. (some would argue a necessary evil) Sadly, the other safeguards that are supposed to prevent or respond to nonsense like this are not up to the task. …
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:06 AM
4

Actually, that one works for me. I have no problem with people making fun of men in general for things that we, in general, are guilty of. That's Humor, and I'm not going to play the victim card against the idea of just having a sense of humor. Case in point: Myself and my male friends are all MUCH more likely to attempt something stupid and injure ourselves than our female friends. This joke doesn't imply men are less capable or intelligent, just that they take more risks. The first add minimiz…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:00 PM
6

Mildly offensive humor is far less acceptable coming from an authority figure, even less so if that authority figure has as a direct requirement of their position an obligation to be impartial across the same gender/race/etc lines they are using for their "joke".
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:33 PM
10

That's not a difficult amount for a spouse or SO to fritter away. Irresponsible behavior will expand to fill whatever limits exist.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:56 PM
6

Dude, in this particular case, any interaction with "the enemy" grants them a massive strategic advantage. No amount of dime-store platitudes can help the fact that you're just plain wrong. Send her stuff back, don't bad mouth her to anyone you know, and move on. That's darn respectful treatment of someone who was deceptive, manipulative, and downright abusive.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:54 PM
3

Indeed! It started as a continuation off your comments, and then I went another direction. I didn't think to move it up-thread. Think of this as an "inspired by" credit - I put my comment here because you helped form the original thought.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:35 PM
2

Keep it front and center that MRA is about equality, not male superiority. It's worth drawing the connection that MRA grew out of a dissatisfaction with a feminism movement that moved from pushing female equality and empowerment to pushing male subjugation and female privilege.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:12 PM
2

I commented elsewhere in the thread, but I fel "big picture" comments need to be added. If it's not okay for you to pressure her into sex, (and it's not) Then it's not okay for you to be pressured into a marriage. That's it. Everything else you'll read here flows from that. Some are advising you to take the steps needed to become comfortable with marriage, some are advising you to leave any woman who would pressure you at all. Remember, - after the fact, saying she pressured you into it gets you…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:56 PM
2

she is very insistent that marriage is an absolute necessity for her I wonder how she would react to a similar ultimatum from you. And I don't mean the classic passive-aggressive reddit leading-question "I wonder" - but an actual "I wonder what she would say if you insisted on setting the terms of your relationship for the rest of your lives." How would she react if having the option to see other people (Open marriage) was an absolute necessity to you? How about if you insisted that adoption was…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:47 PM
2

Also - it will likely matter where you live when you Divorce, so don't relax too much just because you live in TX, you could move somewhere else in the coming years.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:28 PM
-6

This is one of those things where I find it hard to gin up the outrage. The joke here is NOT "woohoo, fathers are so much dumber than mothers!" The joke here is "Little girls don't understand how genders work" or "Kids who don't understand sex say funny things sometimes" Please, let's not let MR turn into the type of group that objects to Jar Jar Binks because they imagine some racial stereotype. There are real problems in this world, and silly FB jokes shouldn't make the cut.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:10 PM
3

every legal "professional" involved with my cases before they got to court was stupid. No one ever bothered to question her statements or the lack of evidence. I would investigate filing complaints with the State Bar on them. It's not much, but that's the system everyone says is supposed to monitor for abusive, neglectful, and sub-par performance among prosecutors and judges.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:29 PM
5

And of course, the woman who provided false statements, manipulated the system, and stole this man;s freedom and access to his child for nearly a year - walks free with no charges and all consequences wiped free by bankruptcy. What a joke. All because the prosecutor's office doesn't want to do their jobs.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:33 PM
7

Ask her if she thinks the "Women Drivers" stereotype is more fair or less fair than the "teenage male racers" stereotype. Sexism isn't funny either way.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:21 PM
-1

Spare me your misdirection. The loaded and open-ended question devoid of a legitimate example or counterargument is the hallmark of someone without a real point to make. Had you said "What about X, where rape of Women is systematically expected and condoned?" you'd have a point. It wouldn't really be related to my point, but it would at least be a coherent thought. Instead, your simply saying "I inferred an unrelated statement, and I'd like to attribute it to you, so I can argue against point yo…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:02 PM
2

Because having vaguely defined and ever-shifting terminology simply allows intellectual cowards to hide behind scary sounding terms with no real meaning. In this case, he's highlighting that this term used to describe an actual culture of systematic abuse that is well documented, as opposed to just a catch all for "stuff we don't like"
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter