TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pabilgames Archive

View 1 post and 112 comments by Pabilgames on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Pabilgames/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 03:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Interesting that you're willing to proclaim yourself to be against equal rights. feminism noun the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. This is "Appeal to Definition", which is a logical fallacy. Dictionary is not the final authority on all issues, especially political ideologies, religions and social behaviours. You do not use dictionaries to understand ideologies. It is not the purpose of a dictionary to teach you such things, to teach you sociology and theolo…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 06:26 AM
2

I would love to see these judges' wife being involved in adultery.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 05:02 PM
2

r/India is a leftist cesspool.
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 04:29 PM
1

you don't need to link to the definition of sociology lol That was not a link to the definition of sociology. Also that's not the sociological explanation. That's a sociological explanation. If you are a Grammar Nazi, researchers have bad news for you.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:38 PM
1

I was just providing the sociological explanation for your behaviour.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:56 AM
1

"𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘖𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥" 𝖻𝗒 𝖯𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖪𝗎𝖿𝗆𝖺𝗇: Calling people stupid or pointing out their stupidity are generally recognized as acts of condescending judgment. We disapprove of what others did, why they did it, or even how they did it, and so we call them or their actions stupid as a way to reflect our disbelief or disgust. In this sense, the act of naming the behavior of others as stupid is a simple way to vent frustration and express displeasure. But calling someone stupid is…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:43 AM
1

That was clearly 𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘮-𝘢𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦. You called me stupid because you disagree with my claim "Wikipedia is a biased and unreliable source". Even if it were true that I am stupid and suffering from some kind of psychological distress, this has absolutely no bearing on the truth value of my claims or logical strength of my arguments—it would be completely irrelevant. https://thecritic.co.uk/the-left-wing-bias-of-wikipedia/
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:21 AM
1

This is ad hominem-abusive, which is a logical fallacy. You resorted to insulting me after I disagreed with your claim about Wikipedia being a reliable source for learning about political ideologies. Insulting isn't going to make corrupt websites like Wikipedia a reliable source of information.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 06:42 PM
1

This is burden of proof, which is a logical fallacy. It is not my responsibility to convince you that I read books.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 01:07 PM
1

do you hold other political positions to this standard? Is the article on liberalism biased because liberals have contributed? Is the article on monarchism biased because at some point a monarchist has contributed? I do not learn about political ideologies from any dictionary or encyclopedia, let alone a biased one, or an unreliable, corrupted website such as Wikipedia. I learn about political ideologies from its most seminal books, books written by its most celebrated theorists.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:53 PM
1

Not a conspiracy theory. It's not just about the feminism page. They can edit other pages related to feminism to give a favourable view of feminism. Any website that feminists have edited at any point in its editorial history is not going to give unbiased view of feminism, I'm also not saying that everything written on feminism on Wikipedia is written by feminists.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:36 PM
1

That is an excuse for the takeover of Wikipedia and promoting a biased view of feminism. If you have adequate sources and think you can write impartially, write about the "dark side". To know about the dark side of feminism we should read the books written by founders and prominent members within the early(first wave) and modern feminist movement not the online Wikipedia and Encyclopedia.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:08 AM
1

In 2018, Amnesty International launched a campaign called the Feminist Wikipedia Takeover that employed tens of thousands of feminist volunteers around the globe to edit Wikipedia such that it gives a favourable picture of feminism. We are not going to find an unbiased understanding of feminism on a website such as Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:52 AM
1

I meant that Wikipedia avoids showing dark side of feminism as much as possible, and it has history of employing prominent feminist activists as it's editors.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:07 AM
2

Nazi was incorrect, maybe misogynist, before you say that you don't hate women, why are you on a subreddit called anti-feminist, when feminism is equal rights. Criticising feminism is not criticising women. Feminism is an IDEOLOGY first. And feminism is NOT synonymous with women's rights. Feminism was never about equality or equal rights. It has always been a female supremacist movement. All the feminist literature, discourse and advocacy from the mid-1800s to the current has focused mainly on f…
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 06:36 PM
3

There is no such thing as pseudo-feminism; true feminism is cancer. True feminism is unbridled misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/22 08:10 AM
9

Can you share the link to that post?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:44 PM
3

Exactly!
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 05:08 PM
3

Feminists have been like that since the beginning of the feminist movement. It's not something recent. You should try reading some contemporary sources to get more of an idea. For example Ernest Belfort Bax (a socialist of about 100 years ago in the UK) was a critic of the feminist movement from the left: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/ Here's something from 1913 „There is a trick with which votaries of Feminism seek to prejudice the public mind against its critics, and that is the “fake” …
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 07:03 PM
4

Feminism today is about female supremacy at the expense of males. Feminism has always been a female supremacist movement. It was never about equality. People need to understand that first.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 05:22 PM
1

Modern feminists are irrational Traditional Feminists ('first wave' feminists) were just as bad if not worse than modern feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:13 PM
6

we are not living in the middle ages anymore we have gotten equal human rights for decades and yet we still live under the stigma that women lead harder lives than men Women were not oppressed or chattel during the middle ages. Feminists have lied to everyone about the women in the middle ages. Even a few minutes of research will reveal that women of the middle ages were queens and nobles and they shared the power and the stature of their husbands as a family. Historian Katrine E. Sjursen in her…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 08:42 AM
3

Feminism is inherently anti-male ideology. But feminists who don't hate men aren't aware that the ideology they support encourage misandry. They are misguided, to believe that feminism is about equality.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 07:26 AM
3

Feminists who don't hate men are cool. Feminists who don't hate men are misguided people. They are misguided to believe that feminism is about equality. They just don't know that the ideology they support is inherently anti-male.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 04:29 AM
3

Stop living in your moms basement. Be more open minded. Again this is an ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy. Even if I'm living in my mom's basement, this has absolutely no bearing on the truth value of my claim or logical strength of my argument—it would be completely irrelevant. Feminism turned sour but it wasn’t always like this. Feminism has always been bad. Traditional Feminism ('first wave' feminism) was just as bad if not worse than contemporary feminism. All the feminist literature, …
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 06:45 PM
2

Go touch some grass First, this is an ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy. Even if I have to 'touch some grass', this has absolutely no bearing on the truth value of my claim or logical strength of my argument—it would be completely irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:25 PM
3

Feminism's final goal is absolute female domination. It has not reached its goal yet.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 04:52 PM
1

MRA’s and feminists should be trying to work together to solve all gendered issues That's impossible because feminists hate men and boys.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:10 AM
17

That doesn't change the fact that feminism since the beginning was bad. Even feminist Wilma Meikle in her 1917 book Towards a Sane Feminism proposed that much pre-war feminist agitation had been inspired by little more than lust for public celebrity and pointless rage. “Let us while there is still time for repentance humbly and with tears confess that all that was done and undone by pre-war feminists was nothing but a prodigious crop of feminine wild oats” Olympe de Gouges, was an adherent suppo…
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 06:33 AM
60

Want all rights, with no responsibilities. Feminism has been like that since the beginning.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 04:07 AM
0

But this idea that more women are selfless than selfish does not beat my every day experience and encounters. I never said that more women are selfless than selfish. I said "We can't start thinking that all women or even most women are manipulative and selfish.Yes, there are a lot of bad women out there. However, I have known far more selfless women in my life than selfish ones." If you don't like feminists generalizing men then don't generalizing women.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 06:25 PM
-1

This book paints only a negative stereotypical view of women. It seeks to demonize women the same way feminists have done to men. You don't defeat your enemy by becoming like them, you win by being better. We can't start thinking that all women or even most women are manipulative and selfish. Yes, marriage is a partnership and our end of the deal is to help provide for their needs because they are making the same promise. Yes, there are a lot of bad women out there. However, I have known far mor…
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 04:00 PM
2

Being true to a limited extent mean women have a unique set of issues just like men have their own unique set of issues. That is not oppression. Representing entire women folk as an oppressed class is a common fallacy.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 09:53 AM
1

If you dox or mention other users, they will get a notification and, will report to admins to get you banned.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 08:42 AM
1

They were in my country. And they still are in some parts. That is, true only to a very limited extent.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 08:32 AM
1

Don't dox or mention other users. Your accout can get banned.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:09 AM
3

Saying that, Women are, and have been in the past, sevearly oppressed by men, is, on one side of it completely false, and on the other true only to a very limited extent. It's really more that feminism has conned everyone into repeating a very rose coloured revisionist history of the time period. Of course it's not uncommon for the victors to rewrite history in this way. You should try reading some contemporary sources to get more of an idea. For example Ernest Belfort Bax (a socialist of about …
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:02 AM
3

Women were not oppressed in the past.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 06:12 AM
1

Exactly! Well Said.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 09:50 AM
2

OP is a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 11:01 AM
-9

All women don't say that "Men will fuck anything". Saying " the gender who uses cucumbers, carrots, tv remotes, water bottles, knives, corn, 17 different toys and a water faucet to masturbate" is like attacking the whole female gender.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 04:36 AM
-10

This is misogynistic.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 04:22 AM
-1

Come on that's just a joke.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 02:52 AM
2

Even feminist leaders of that time were misandrists.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 01:11 AM
2

What I meant is there are women who identify as feminist who share the same views as egalitarians. And there are still a lot of them out there. Then we should try to bring them out of the cult of feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 04:08 PM
4

Now real feminists will care. Because true feminists will care about men and women’s rights. Nope. Feminism was never about equality. It has always been about man-hating and power. Feminists are the enemies of boys and men. The people who genuinely care about men’s rights are the real feminists. Real feminists protest to get events about men's issues cancelled. Just look at this.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 06:03 AM
4

I agreed, I think feminism nowadays have shift and twist their goal into something else worst.. I’ve seen plenty of feminism propaganda and they were completely full of bullshits. Feminism has always been bad. It's just that most people don't know.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 04:19 AM
2

Believe it or not, those that feminists like to call 'first wave' were just as bad as new-age feminism if not worse. It's just that most people don't know. Traditional feminism was full of the same hate and violence and depravity as that of new age feminism. Traditional Feminism ('first wave' feminism) was just as bad if not worse than contemporary feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 03:29 AM
5

Here's the article.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:36 AM
12

I did not state that everything written on feminism on Wikipedia is written by feminists. Any dictionary that employs a feminist as an editor at any point in its editorial history is not going to define feminism as a sexist ideology to you otherwise they wouldn't employ renowned feminist activists as editors for their dictionary.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 04:39 AM
178

Wikipedia is a biased source of information. In 2018, Amnesty International launched a campaign called the Feminist Wikipedia Takeover that employed tens of thousands of feminist volunteers around the globe to edit Wikipedia such that it gives a favourable picture of feminism. You are not going to find an unbiased understanding of feminism on a website such as Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:03 PM
17

Feminists from the 1800s were sexist, racist, gay phobic and transphobic. Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 07:12 AM
3

You're really trying to equate feminism to the KKK....wow. I guess feminists have a history of lynching men and literally hating anyone that isn't them even though there are 5 main types of feminism that are completely different yet none of them have to do with hating men. Feminism is a viciously bigoted group like KKK. Feminism has a history of getting men killed, killing children(especially boys), pedophilia, lying, terrorism, sexism, racism, slavery, data manipulation etc. All feminist books …
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/22 04:50 AM
3

Feminism didn't say to kill all men or anything like that. Women that claim to be feminists did. Feminism did say to kill all men or something. Feminism has always been a vicious anti-egalitarian( racist and sexist ) ideology. All feminist books and theories written by the biggest influencers of feminist dogma from the 1800s to the current day have focused mainly on man-hating and science fiction. Claiming that feminism is not viciously bigoted against men is like saying that the KKK is not raci…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 08:21 PM
87

Why were almost all videos that were making fun of feminism deleted on YouTube? Because those videos go against the state-sponsored feminist propaganda.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 11:57 AM
13

That person seems to be a chronic liar.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:26 PM
18

The members of r/FemaleDatingStrategy follow a totalitarian ideology(feminism) comrade. They prohibit all opposing viewpoints and outlaw individual opposition to their dogma.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:28 PM
191

r/BlatantMisogyny is full of blatant misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 02:02 AM
7

Post this on r/Cringetopia
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 07:12 AM
10

Lol. Nice Try.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 06:04 PM
32

That meme looks misandristic, not misogynistic.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 09:41 PM
3

Nope. I see lot of shit in this post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 02:27 AM
6

I have worked in a bull farm. And yet, I haven't seen so much bullshit in a single place.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 05:07 PM
4

"𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵: 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝖸 (𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦) 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝖷 (𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦) 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴, 𝘪𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘐𝘯 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦, 𝘢 𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘦. 𝘛𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥: 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴." 𝖳𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝖾𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝗂𝖾𝖽 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖲𝖢𝖴𝖬 𝖬𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝗒 𝖵𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾 𝖲𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 05:49 AM
21

r/FemaleDatingStrategy is worse than r/twoxchromosomes
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 07:53 PM
5

Exactly.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 01:01 PM
5

India is most definitely NOT a patriarchal society. look at the laws on abuse and marriage and rape.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 11:53 AM
6

We need egalitarianism not feminism. Feminism as an ideology has always been anti-male. Read "Decleration of Sentiments" or "Decleration of Feminism," a document signed in 1848 by feminists. Awww..............is someone sad that their job has been taken by a women? Or that he can't find a fuckmaid? Women were allowed to work in the past. Even before feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 11:21 AM
5

Feminism has always been bad. We don't need feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 10:36 AM
1

If every article written by a woman is 'propaganda' or 'man haters' and the only credible source is written by an unbiased man (impossible, by the way), that's sexism. Here you are conflating feminism with women. Consider this: there are more antifeminist women than feminist women when you come down to brass tacks. Why is that? Why is it that despite the shared lived experience of being female, that same shared lived experience is not only not enough to unite women in feminism, but more likely t…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:42 AM
3

Feminism today is not feminism then you cannot argue that past and present are the same. Feminism as an ideology today is based on feminist literature, advocacy, and discourse from the past. All feminist literature, advocacy and discourse from the past were about man-hating. So feminism is a man-hating ideology. Feminism today needs men, and fully supports MRA. We want men’s rights just as much as we want women’s rights. That's a big fat lie. Feminists are against the rights of men and boys. Fem…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 05:56 PM
6

What is your guys' deal with feminism? Why is it so horrible? Feministic ideals = equality for men AND women. Feminism was never about equality. Feminism is an ideology of hate and bigotry against men. All feminist literature, advocacy and discourse from the late 1800s and the early 1900s to today confirm that. You cannot run away from that facts. Although I think you're just proving my point that this page thinks men need to be better than women. MRAs despise feminism, not women. Feminism despi…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:58 AM
5

MensLib stands for the Men's Liberation Movement (MLM), a movement started by the largest feminist organisation in the world the National Organisation for Women (NOW) back in the 1970s. It tried to introduce feminist concepts into the men's rights movement disguised as men's rights, all this in an attempt to hijack the men's rights movement and turn it into a feminist movement. MensLib is nothing but feminism disguised as men's rights. It thankfully failed miserably in its endeavour to hijack th…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:05 AM
8

Why Are Y'all So Anti-Feminism? Feminism is an ideology of hate and bigotry built upon lies and hypocrisy. Feminism as far as I'm aware does not have democratically elected representatives. However, the purveyors of feminist doctrine from early suffragettes and theorists right through the pioneers of the second wave feminism like Germain Greer, Catherine Mackinnon to modern doyen's of the movement like Naomi Wolf, have all subscribed to the principle that, as Robin Morgan put it- "Man-hating is …
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:18 AM
20

Lucky for him, he lives in Iran. Nope. He will be executed.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 11:39 AM
3

That’s extremely fucked up. The man deserves to be executed for his actions.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 09:32 AM
9

A small correction; It's not historical narrative so "Historical Narrative" should be replaced with "Feminist Narrative".
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 06:51 AM
7

Believe it or not, those that feminists like to call 'first wave' were just as bad as modern feminists if not worse. It's just that most people don't know. This is thanks in large part to the fact that feminism controls the mainstream narrative surrounding its past and its present and it has written its history, whitewashed its past and given it a makeover, presenting itself in the past as being nothing but a wholesome, heroic ideology with genuine goals. This could not be further from its truth…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 07:21 AM
21

Ah, another shit movie like that "Birds of Prey".
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 12:14 PM
17

Explain to me how this is offensive to anybody in any way? Because that comment goes against the feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:41 AM
49

He's just an attention-seeking troll. Ignore him.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 07:15 PM
8

Feminism is a complete joke. This video should be under the "Comedy" category.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:07 PM
5

Looks like r/memes was infiltrated by feminists. This teaches us nothing but one thing, that there are feminists on that subreddit trying to control its narrative such that it is less threatening to feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 06:34 AM
1

I think that girl was a average FDS user.
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/22 01:35 PM
0

Your comment is pure CRINGE.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/22 04:23 AM
5

Would you guys still marry a female if you found out she was a feminist? BIG NO!
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 09:12 PM
1

LOOSER hahaha you don't have any point to counter my points.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 07:15 PM
1

Then what the fuck is it? Feminism is an ideology first. Consider the -ism. It is a set of theories about how society is constructed. This is what egalitarians, MRAs, and antifeminists oppose; their set of theories. Because last I checked it's about equality between all genders, and was created by women for women to achieve equality. You do not use dictionaries to understand ideologies. It is not the purpose of a dictionary to teach you such things, to teach you sociology and theology. Its purpo…
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 06:59 PM
17

Feminism is NOT synonymous with women's rights.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 05:03 AM
-1

To be honest, what you said was undeniably sexist. You did the same crap that feminists always do.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 04:31 AM
18

It shouldn't exist anywhere in the world.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 04:42 PM
7

Feminism has always been about hating men.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 03:05 PM
2

It's up to you at the end of the day if hating men is your thing then go for it, as I've said to others hate men if you want to but at least live by your morals if you have any, avoid using anything made by men.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 06:26 PM
63

MRAs fight the real enemy; feminism Feminists fight the imaginary enemy; patriarchy
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 08:52 PM
3

So then curious, how would you describe my beliefs? Your beliefs don't align with those mainstream feminists. So you're one of us( anti-feminists ) now.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 07:19 PM
3

Still, they are the leaders of the feminist movement so they are the ones that represent the feminist movement, not you. You're not important in this case.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 07:02 PM
0

In Middle Eastern countries: Women have full voting rights, and women's vote is not treated as half a vote. Women are allowed to drive, there is no law forbidding them from getting a license. Women don't have to be wrapped in a certain way, because burkha is optional. But only a headscarf is mandatory. Women are allowed to get an education. Women were never restricted from getting an education. There were many female scholars in the Islamic empires; List of female Islamic Scholars
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:33 PM
3

You do not learn about feminism from any dictionary. You do not use dictionaries to understand ideologies. It is not the purpose of a dictionary. Its purpose is purely linguistic. You are looking for an accurate definition of feminism in the wrong places. You learn the true definition of feminism from all the feminist literature, discourse and advocacy from the early 1900s to the present day. All feminist literature, discourse and advocacy from the late 19th century and early 20th century to the…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 11:38 AM
1

In many middle east countries women are treated as second class citizens and are denied basic rights. In these countries, women's vote are treated as half a vote, they are not allowed to drive, not allowed to go out unless they are wrapped in a specific manner, not allowed to get education , and hundreds of other discriminations.... This is false.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 10:39 AM
3

I’m a feminist, but my beliefs don’t align with the feminists you’ve described above. I don’t think men organized our society to harm women. Then you're an anti-feminist. Your beliefs perfectly align with most of the people on this sub.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 08:39 AM
2

That meme is misleading. I think that many people still believe that first-wave feminists fought for equality, which is related to the fact that feminism has done a great job rewriting its history. The truth is feminism was never meant to be about equality. Feminism has always been bad. Feminism is an ideology of hate and bigotry built upon lies and hypocrisy. Feminists in the late 19th century and early 20th century were extremely vile towards men and black women. All feminist literature, disco…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 07:45 AM
5

Feminism is a cult at this point. Feminism has always been a cult.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:24 AM
7

So because mens rights are always actively women-hating does that mean we should dimish the true purpose behind fighting for mens rights? I don't define feminism by the words of a few, or groups of people who are obviously bigoted, or obviously biased because logically anyone biased can't have a logical stand point of things, like feminism. If someone has a skewed vision of feminism and is very clearly biased against men, then how can you believe their intentions are purely for equality? MRAs de…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:41 AM
8

Feminism has an actual definition and when you claim to be a feminist while putting down men that either means you want to be treated like shit(how you treat men) or you're not actually a feminist. You do not learn learn the true definition of feminism from dictionary. You do not use dictionaries to understand ideologies. It is not the purpose of a dictionary to teach you such things, to teach you sociology and theology. It's purpose is purely linguistic. You are looking for an accurate definiti…
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:50 PM
6

Feminism was never meant to be about equality. Feminism has always been bad. Feminism is an ideology of hate and bigotry built upon lies and hypocrisy. Feminists in the late 19th century and early 20th century were extremely vile towards men and black women. All feminist literature, discourse and advocacy from the late 19th century and early 20th century to the current day have focused mainly on demonising men and infantilising women.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 01:40 PM
15

There’s something really wrong with the comments on that thread where people are downvoting comments about showing sympathy for guys who get falsely accused of rape.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 07:12 AM
2

Feminism was never about equality.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 01:01 PM
4

This proves my point even further that modern day feminism is a cult. Feminism has always been a cult.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 08:53 AM
3

There is nothing wrong with being a “anti-feminist.” Being a anti-feminist does not at all mean you are against women’s rights, you hate women, or you are against equality. Rather, an “anti-feminist” just sees the sexism and misandry in the feminist movement and does not align with it because they feel that true equality must also be achieved by looking at men’s issues.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 08:19 AM
6

We're are anti-feminists not feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 08:13 AM
7

Post this on r/MensRights.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 01:34 PM
52

Dr. Phil is a pathetic bitch. The fact he said this after reading what she did is sickening, dude got no right calling himself a doctor.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 11:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter