TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PabloNovelGuy Archive

View 1 post and 56 comments by PabloNovelGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

GeneralPabloNovelGuy/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:44 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If they weren't irrational and prone to lying leaving the truth aside for feels; they wouldn't be feminists in a world in which feminism already won equality, wouldn't they?.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:25 PM
-3

Should not, I'm not a Christian I don't believe in forgiveness as a virtue, only truth. Even if I did one needs to be dumb to not see who is attacking who.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 10:27 PM
1

Not radical at all, an intelligent Psicologist with independent thoughts.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:32 AM
20

"Lets vote to take more stuff once marriage breaks, and make sure we can put any man into prison with a proper testimony! (by myself only)" ... "Why can't I get married to those people I already made sure I could destroy if I wished?, how strange they don't like me"
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:49 PM
25

They are part of the political neomarxist left; and they follow the so called 'Repressive Tolerance', they are very tolerant except with anyone who is politically oposed to them. So, really is repressive more than anything but maskerading as equalitarian and so on. That kind of ideology has standards, but mainly to the outgroup, not to itself. It would be like asking a predator to respect the prey.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:07 PM
1

Far away from where there's feminists, and where they have any influence. They are preaching to the wrong people, but won't stop preaching.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 01:51 AM
1

For the hateful liars, the truth is hate.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:14 AM
7

Regarding the leaders, in the feminist movement, not the mindlesly following: If they were into equality they wouldn't be feminists, they would be equalitarian. Obviously they don't care about equality, only about pretending they care because they are too cowardly to say they wish to be superior.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:54 PM
2

That standarized way of new speech is meant to divide society; that way the powerful can have more power, since no one likes anyone else the state needs to grow and become ever more totalitarian. Is done by allowing and pushing up the people who speak like that.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:39 PM
1

If feminists weren't anti men and pro women; they wouldn't be called feminists, imagine if there was a mainstream movement named: Maleists that want equality, what would you think?; they really want equality?. The Maleists?. Then why would feminism be?, for equallity?, no: they are liars.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:59 PM
2

Because culture is controlled by the same people who support feminism, and what the masters say it is, it is; there's no reason for it, is doctrine. That is done because by pushing up women who are more agreeable, and pushing down men you attain more control over society, since controlling agreeable people is easier. Is a method of control, a very smart one. They could be saying that the sky is green, and telling you, you are a bad person if you think is blue. It has no reason in on itself, only…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:17 PM
1

So now flirting is bad huh?. Like in the old times.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:56 AM
2

Feminists tend to believe that all violence against women is due to men deeming women as inferior and or hating them. They don't seem to understand that violence against men from men is higher in quantity by a lot, and likely in violence of the individual actions; they don't seem to understand that some people don't need to hate an entire group of people in order to commit violent acts against one of them. Why is it?, because that's what they are told. They are told 'because patriachy' and that'…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:15 AM
5

If someone or someones is powerful enough to create a society, I assure you there's no one that can tell that someone or someones to not complain. So the argument is absurd either way. Is irrelevant, feminists will be female supremacists; that's what they do, and they will use lies or not as they see fit. Their arguments are of no worth because they never mattered, is about power not truth.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:28 PM
1

would still be a problem, quotas are dumb at best.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:41 PM
8

By using quotas you reinforce the belief that the quota group is inferior. No one who is up to the task would reliably need quotas to reach that position for any sustained period of time, under a rational system; and companies get paid to be rational. So they already tend towards proper decision making when left to fail and try again. And once the quotas become ever stronger and the quota candidates become weaker on average. The perceived inferiority of the quota group in the job goes from perce…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:36 PM
9

That reminded me to the phrase "A true king does not need to say 'I'm the king' " ; A qualified person does not need to say 'I need a quota'
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:30 PM
2

Because women have more votes, so policians, culture and the media (which are all tighly related), pander to them.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:44 PM
2

Most Remarkably high IQ people are male.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:20 PM
1

All of that is about reproduction, overall in history we adopt beliefs which are useful to making more humans, caring more about women's needs was more useful to breed more humans in our evolutionary history, both cultural one and biological. Its only a problem lately because we have a thing called 'human rights', and women actually get to have political power enough for that to be a problem; since they have a lot more political responsibility, and can no longer act like 'vanilla' females could …
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:28 PM
3

That in my country would be legal, one way or the other. But dangerous in the case of any accusation, specially if the adult is male.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:11 PM
10

Yes she is, if she isn't stupid.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:49 AM
1

I think I must be a terrible criminal in their view. And I would have stared again, and I will stare again, I don't care about the opinions of people who act like devils would be expected to act.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 11:16 PM
1

You cannot reliably convince, deal, or have long friendly interactions with (true) idiots (and strong feelers) by using reason; they only respond to consensus and emotionally charged arguments, they have a simplified model of reality and emotional responses before thought; their model is what they perceive is the model for the overall group. They can only be convinced by creating the illusion of consensus, or consensus itself; preferably mixed with emotional appeals; not by arguments or reason. …
/r/MensRights28/04/22 09:43 PM
1

I said I would delete the post in another comment up there. But I cannot change the name of it, so that's what I did.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:58 PM
1

Well, I delete the post as I said I would. See you in another likely unrelated post. Or do I change the name?
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:34 PM
1

People like you (likely) got him killed
/r/ExRedPill21/04/22 03:14 PM
8

The implications of the definition of feminism versus its real action implies that feminists act as if men aren't human, since Equality doesn't apply to men. Or that they lie about the definition of their own movement.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:47 PM
2

Of course they would that's what they do. But the likelyhood that the goverment has noting to do with it when they don't have incentive to do otherwise (because if you say anything against them is Russian propaganda). Means they are more likely to actually do it, they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:44 PM
2

I get that if Russia didn't invaded it wouldn't happen, that is obvious; I don't think that anyone here disagrees with such an statement, but the fact it happened won't change because of it.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:17 PM
2

The Ukranian Goverment has units which go around hunting people like him, or units that deliver those captured to the relevant authorities, they have gotten rid of quite a few people. Of course there's an unknown amount which must be caused by random folks deciding to commit a crime, but that doesn't deny the systemic issue. The fact that is a problem to ever mention it, reveals how corrupted is free speech; even here where we are used to dealing with an already attacked and slandered field of t…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:15 PM
3

Where is the Putin simping?. Is it Putin simping to mention a C.R.P is likely dead and turns out that there are murderers on the Ukranian side too?. What we are supposed to all sharap and say nothing because we are all afraid of the current N.P.C/Follow The Current Thing mob, that will next month go back to push for Believe All Women?.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 12:04 PM
1

I agree, though is a problem when the US says the same thing in an official way. Since its literally what they do all the time, but get pissed when the Russians learn from them, and start invading countries; because Zelensky has 'biolabs' and baddies.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:59 AM
5

The fact Russia is invading Ukraine which is illegal, doesn't make the Ukranian Government good, it only means they are getting invaded. Being a victim doesn't make anyone good by default.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:57 AM
1

The same media that talked about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. To coin a phrase 'I don't know about god, but the devil: does seem to work on the mainstream media'.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:43 AM
2

"Do you swear under the current law, the Bible, the Quoran, the declaration of independence of the United States, and every constitution that you willlingly shall now perform sexual acts with me: state my name" ​ -"I thereby swear under every constitution and under the watch of this recording that I named: **** will perform sexual relations with named **** on day 28 April of 2022, from 16:00 hours GMT to 18:00, of which an extension period may be approved by both parties" ​ -"Do you confirm?" ​ …
/r/MensRights21/04/22 12:26 AM
1

They want supremacy, not justice. Was always about female supremacy; the women that want it keep pushing for it, the rest won't do anything. Because women somehow cannot fathom they have most of the voting power in society, they retain an inferiority complex, which makes it very hard for them to understand that such a thing is the case. As well as a bias towards not going against the perceived common knowledge which is even greater than in the case of men; leading to the current situation, in wh…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 12:17 AM
7

Likely dead, he's missing since Friday; and we do know people who spoke badly about Zelensky within Azov controlled territory got killed, and that they were searching for him since weeks ago. So I'm not sure if is true yet, if is not I will delete the post. But so it seems, is the most likely scenario at this point; I hope I'm wrong, but that is unlikely by now.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:06 PM
1

Obtain information first, and call them out in their discrimination; is important even if is unsucessful because the other boys, and girls need to know what kind of people control the school. ​ If they say no, they are very openly discriminating and is even more obvious, those freedom wins on the long run. If they accept the argument, then freedom wins directly. ​ Is more about letting clear to everyone they are not good people; that's all feminists have, they have the mask of good people; if yo…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:14 PM
1

That guy has said some truths about the bad stuff that the Ukranian all saint goberment has done; few people said so. He also stated the obvious, Putin is not crazy, is a rational actor. Lira is pushing back against the demonization of Russia as a country as some kind of irrational salvages that the media seems to push. Demonization which is untrue, unless we are going to consider the invasion of Irak worthy of world wide financial war against the United States. People don't talk about the bad s…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:28 PM
5

True
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:02 PM
13

Looks like Zelensky is better than I expected; probably the most badass comedian out there.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:15 PM
2

This is gold, is a very good take; feminism as a sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:27 PM
0

World War III: add clueless politicians, evil politicians, the media trying to stir up as much tension, conflict and sensationalism as they can. And you get a high chance of nuclear rains. That's probably the biggest. If you mean the second, probably the economy going to hell because no one will want the dollar at this rate; if countries change to some other coin for the oil trade, the dollar collapses very quickly. The thrid is feminism and the welfare/single mother's state pushing all of it fa…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 12:05 AM
1

In short: Because women have the majority of the vote, and equality is a tool to achieve power not an objective people follow to its ultimate conclusion. It was always a mask, since most people don't have true ideology, they have tools. Men care for women more than for other men, women as a gender hold the long therm political power, they determine the tendency of society in the political sphere when averaged over many election cycles. Women don't want to be conscripted, so they don't. To the av…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:33 PM
2

When feminists loose, at least the kind of feminists that try to take power now; not only men win, women too. With feminism, a collapse is inevitable because there's no reason for men to defend a society that hates them; and such collapse is worst than angry comments, is utter misery.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:21 PM
1

Now they only need to get natality rates up and they'll be great.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:17 PM
50

I think is both a learnt and evolved bias.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 07:13 PM
4

Exactly, feminists confuse biological realities and reality in general with something they can fix the same way you change tax rates; is not, but that kind of people seem to lack the a priory systematic thinking to figure out: Since the world contains them they should act accordingly; not the other way around, the world is not a social construct in a person's head which can be fundamentally changed thru indoctrination, you only become blind to it.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:16 PM
6

I wonder how many people will die in fires, because there are unqualified firefighters. How many before they stop the nonsense?. 100?, 1000?. Is difficult for me to tell.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:01 PM
5

No; for selective equality of outcome, for the outcomes they like; also known as veiled female supremacy in the eyes of the law and popular culture. At the cost of far more than 21 billion, at the cost of gender relations and equality of opportunity and equal treatment under the law.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:31 PM
9

Feminists have a most likely seemingly fundamental or even genetic up to a point belief, that they are inferior to men; that's why they have so much political power, by women having the majority of the votes; days dedicated to them with large crowds; politicians and the media in favor; laws in favor : AND Even then they still think themselves as oppressed, and the underdog; which is nothing other than a deep inferiority complex.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:30 PM
29

In my country, Spain; they say the same shit. Women suffer more at war and so on, while the men get shot. Is a total disregard for male lives, any notion of equality; rather is a political doctrine which deems men as subhumans. Whether they say it directly or not, they do say it indirectly.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:27 PM
3

Is either badass steroids type of wrestling; or Judo : smash forward; or increase the inertia of the hostile force so much they crash. That's pretty much the short version.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:21 PM
4

The process will continue; that's because in most of the world there's democracies, at least in the most influential countries (except China). Most of the population in most countries are women, and women have little empathy for men, they have empathy for children and other women, but don't care about male suffering nearly as much, in an statistical sense; Women don't understand that now that they can vote, they actually have more power than men; they are evolved to an environment in which men w…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:09 PM
4

When you step on a man you create something stronger; is the same thing they do in armies when they treat reclutes like shit. Is normal as a man to be treated like shit, but is also normal for nonproportional retaliation to happen; that's why there's are limits, is a self stabilizing process.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter