TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PacoBedejo Archive

View 0 posts and 624 comments by PacoBedejo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Modern slavery.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 02:22 PM
0

Left and Right are garbage terms for a false dichotomy. Coerced <---> Voluntary That's what matters. I'm for maximized voluntary association and natural individual rights. Neither US Federal political party offers such. Both bloviate ceaselessly about which coercions they'll perpetrate upon whom. They tend to differ in one area: the tools of self-defense. I do not want to let these liars, thieves, rapists, slavers, and murderers to a pure monopoly on guns. So my national votes go against whichev…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:39 PM
1

Age 27 to 32 is the time I started learning that unrestrained empathy can be rather destructive. It's true. Don't feed the bears. They'll stop feeding themselves. I stick to making sure the horse knows where the water is but I don't bother trying to make it drink. I'm 48 now and my son, adopted at 13 from foster "care", is now 27. He's understood this stuff since he was about 22. Hopefully we can get his 7yo son to understand it during his teens.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:16 AM
10

all self-harm as suicide attempts https://i.imgur.com/tVROylw.gif
/r/MensRights09/03/25 06:15 PM
1

I feel like your sarcasm detector might need an alignment.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 02:16 PM
-9

violation of the guys privacy Did you just presume their gender?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:53 AM
3

state = generic term for any political entity that claims the sole right to initiate aggression and to enforce its version of justice in a geographic area
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:28 PM
11

I picked my drafting career when I was 7 years old because I had watched how worn out my dad was from manual labor and didn't want to live like that. When I was 7 years old, I begged for a drafting board, T-square, compass, numerous templates, and mechanical pencils for Christmas. I must've seen drafters in a movie or something. The next year, dad brought home a copy of AutoCAD 2.6 from the engineers where he worked. We had to find a math coprocessor emulator to get it running on the Tandy 1000h…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 12:31 PM
1

Odd reflex. Missed my first sentence?
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:04 AM
5

Fuck Russia's government. But, this is why I say that Ukraine's government can go to hell. Fuck slavers.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:50 PM
10

A coworker is in jail because he dated a single mom and won an accusation without physical evidence. Beware crazy eyes and single moms.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:04 PM
13

Woah, coming in hot with the misogyny today huh? If that was your takeaway, I hope you study hard enough to get that cashier job.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:53 PM
11

I'm willing to accept that explanation. In response, perhaps we shouldn't trust the mental faculties of women. Maybe they shouldn't be able to access banks, own property, or vote because they don't even have the basic mental control over their hormonal swings needed to not murder their own children. Is that really what these fuckwads want?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:40 AM
-1

30% to 40% of my productivity for my adult lifetime -vs- 100% of my productivity for a year or two
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:57 AM
9

This is why I don't care if Ukraine falls. The use of slavery for war means it's an immoral regime that isn't fit to exist.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:11 AM
-5

30% to 40% taxation isn't skin?
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:10 AM
1

Is that a problem? We don't ride horses or make our own soap in general, either. There are newer forms of storytelling. Is there something magical about pigment on wood pulp or the novel's structure? I question the relative value of reading through Tom Sawyer in about 8 hours versus completing the game Portal 2 in about 8 hours.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:11 PM
11

Do you know if there's a way to increase cooperation on mixed teams? Unmix them.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 08:52 PM
7

And 110 years ago, British women were handing British men white feathers if they weren't in uniform, indicating they were cowards. This isn't new behavior. But, as you point out, the standards have changed. It's important to understand that not everyone shares your cultural standards and that you ought be careful of which sorts you spend time with. Pro tip: if you met her on an app or in a bar, she probably isn't the one.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 01:50 AM
28

I know several feminine men who do the same things. One of the hallmarks of masculinity is calling a thing what it is.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 12:22 PM
54

It's why accusations without evidence should be ignored. It's also why chaperones used to be a thing.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 12:20 PM
0

According to the Larimer County sheriff, there is evidence that the driver was distracted when she hit and killed our sweet son as he biked home a few blocks from a friend’s house in Timnath. Sometimes an accident is just an accident. Without knowing what sort of road it was... how many cars might have been parked along it... how the boy ended up in front of the car... how many seconds elapsed between the supposed distraction and the collision... we really don't know enough to have the vitriolic…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:44 PM
0

Divorce rates are down, not up. https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-us-divorce-rate-has-hit-a-50-year-low I think the drama and disloyalty is mostly within the groups of people who build fast relationships. Those who still understand courtship aren't having the same problems... and a lot of people still understand it. They just aren't the ones who are terminally online, choosing to be forever alone.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 04:22 PM
1

You already have been given similar situations where the men were charged much more harshly is similar situations I've not seen any. The only that was even remotely similar was a man in a 20,000 lb commercial truck with known-to-be-non-functional brakes who plowed over a minivan that was stopped at a light, killing 4 of the occupants. But, that's hardly comparable to hitting a kid on a bike sometime around the time that a text message was sent or received (I haven't seen whether she sent one or …
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:47 PM
1

Evidence in that jurisdiction?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 01:42 PM
0

Meanwhile, literally none of my friends have divorced after 20+ years. These are LAN party friends from the late 90s. Maybe some guys suck at being husbands and fathers. Of course, we didn't meet our wives on apps or in bars.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 01:08 PM
0

I guess i didn't know what it meant, either. Corrected to "idiotic" as that's closer to my intended meaning. What's the pattern in display here?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:16 PM
0

You're assuming, perhaps rightly so. But, you're also comparing across jurisdictions. The pre-vitriol is idiotic.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:26 PM
0

The comment I replied to was: Fucking female privilege. That’s society for you. I'm not seeing the "fucking female privilege" in this case. Are you?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:58 PM
0

Yep. How is that applying in this case?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:30 PM
-5

I'm aware. But I don't see evidence of that in this case. Do you?
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:06 PM
2

He plowed into stopped traffic in a very large vehicle that he knew had bad brakes and he was driving distractedly. The woman in OP's story sent a text message sometime around the moment she ran into a boy on a bike. The defense argued that Weiss did not have time to see the boy because another driver had obstructed her view seconds before the crash. That's not quite the same situation. She was also accused of deleting a text message made at the time of the crash and on Dec. 6 she pleaded guilty…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:17 PM
5

That's not how written communication works.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:26 PM
0

Show me where a man in Colorado received a harsher sentence for the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:22 PM
5

There you go. I'm not seeing the identity-based difference that these ideologically possessed jackasses are assuming. I'm 110% for men's rights. But, follow Robert Downey Jr's advice from Tropic Thunder. Never go full...
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:45 PM
2

I didn't say what my stance on the punishment was. Did you assume it?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:44 PM
-29

That's how we know you have the reasonable position...
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:02 PM
-5

Is there any evidence that a man has had a harsher charge in the same or a politically-similar jurisdiction?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 02:47 PM
9

Aye. "Same situation" includes jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 02:46 PM
0

What crime would a man have been charged with in the same situation?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 02:00 PM
-30

Are you saying a man would've been charged with a different crime?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 01:48 PM
-51

That isn't how maximum sentencing works.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 01:39 PM
-135

From the article: The charge is punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $300. I see no identity privilege here (for once). Edit: Y'all seem ideologically possessed. Feel free to show other same-situations in Colorado where a man was charged with and convicted of a crime with a harsher sentence. Have fun with your collective emotionality. Very manly, fellas. SMH...
/r/MensRights21/12/24 01:24 PM
3

Believe evidence, not testimony.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:59 PM
0

I got married at the age of 21, in 1999 and did so because codependency is a helluva drug. We've stayed married for 25 years. It hasn't been a joyride. But, we're here and better than ever. I'm not sure I'd like to have lived life single. But, it's tempting to think that the grass is greener on the other path.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 09:57 PM
175

Be a man. Take a drink. Remain responsible for your actions. versus Be a woman. Take a drink. Every man around you is responsible for your actions.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 12:26 AM
15

Be in a self-defense-friendly jurisdiction. Be well armed and well practiced. Don't call the cops until the situation is controlled.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:28 AM
5

All of you saying you're not part of unions, don't you think your lives would be better if you were? Unions are like HOAs. Why would I invite one more layer of governing bureaucracy into my life? I work for a small employer where I'm able to bargain individually. Giving yourself over to a collective is for the weak.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 03:44 PM
5

He's a straight white, married man who is now the father of a white boy and a white girl. HE IS NOT "ethnic". He hasn't helped to mass murder people for a nation state. He works for FedEx and is not part of a union. He hasn't been a student for 8 years. He isn't disabled. He's at least 39 years from some sort of retirement. HE IS their enemy.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 02:25 PM
6

I'm a straight, white, married man who is the adopted father of a young man rescued from the state's feckless foster system and an employee of a small business. I AM NOT "ethnic". I didn't help to mass murder people for a nation state. I'm not a small business entrepreneur. There isn't a union for design drafters. I haven't been a student for 27 years. I'm not disabled. I'm at least 19 years from some sort of retirement. I AM their enemy.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:19 PM
17

You don't owe a damned thing to the thieving, murdering government that occupies your land. Pay them the taxes that they'll jail/kill you for not paying, but do not let them enslave you into their violent conflicts.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 10:03 AM
6

Who's that? Their ghosts?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 10:00 AM
4

And this is why I'm a single issue voter. Anyone who wants to take my ability to defend myself and my community against tyranny is an enemy. My vote goes to whomever convinces me that they're not coming after our battle rifles. Only tyrants disarm the people.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:53 AM
18

Draft dodging is the most American thing one can do. Slavery is evil. It doesn't matter what other names people invent for it.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:32 AM
3

Gun grabbers and environmentalists are right up there.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:12 PM
6

I'm told that they'll work for less pay, too.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:11 PM
-6

If you don't want babies, don't play baby games. Quit acting like animals. Nobody should have a choice beyond something like a "morning-after" pill. She knows when she takes one in the crotch, and there's a pill for it. Guys should know not to sling one in there if they aren't in a committed relationship with a sane woman. I have some sympathy for idiots who get all tangled up in the oldest gambit. But, not much. Use your damned brains, guys.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 11:04 AM
3

Yep. It's a team effort, and if she is able to better acquire resources in today's heavily gynocentric world, don't ignore it. My ego doesn't require me to pretend that my team is better off with me on resource duty. My wife started selling houses for a local builder earlier this year. Her August commission was half my annual salary as an engineer with 25 years of experience and 16 years with my current employer. Don't get hung up on it, guys. It doesn't matter who's gathering wood or who's buil…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:48 AM
1

I grew up in a NE Indiana city where the vast majority of people sound almost exactly like national newscasters. There are several Irish and British accents which are almost entirely indecipherable to me due to their significant lack of enunciation. My mother-in-law grew up in Ireland. Her eldest brother flew over for my wedding. I couldn't understand 3/4 of what he said.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:27 PM
7

British men, You are hereby invited to the United States of America. Please make travel plans as follows: Fly to Mexico Lose your passport Hire someone to take you to the California border Walk across Take a bus to Indiana Buy a newly-built home for $280k Build an AR-15 pistol for fun and personal defense Learn the language (hint: enunciation) Prosper Forget about the weak, pathetic pieces of shit you left behind
/r/MensRights28/08/24 11:33 AM
0

Ignoring her complete and utter ignorance of firearm laws... and her racism... "Selective Service", aka wartime enslavement, is far more intrusive than anything the little waste of air could imagine. That's not to mention society's levied expectations of work, leadership, and contribution from men. She doesn't know what it's like to grind away at a soul-crushing job to provide for others... mostly against your will via "taxation", aka organized theft.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 11:05 AM
48

Most women can't be reasoned with because they value the manipulation of people. They predominantly function on consensus, inclusion, shame, and exclusion. You'll find that feminine and woman-raised men also do this. You'll find manipulation much more effective with such people. Reason is for people who value the manipulation of reality, rather than people. For those who want to build and create. For those who want to improve the world and the people around them. Do not bother casting the pearls…
/r/MensRights20/07/24 01:37 PM
14

SMH that poor baby was failed on so many levels. I'm a former foster parent in Indiana. I adopted a 13yo boy from the system, who is now 26yo. The state wouldn't let my son go back to his parents because they didn't have 50 sq ft of exclusive bedroom space for him. So, he got to live with 12 foster families over the course of 5 years before we, his 13th foster family, adopted him. The whole thing is corrupt as hell. Anything charity should do, government will fuck up. If I was aware of a kid liv…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 02:42 PM
60

So, basically the average content of the internet.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:04 PM
8

Use imgur.com to host pictures and then just put the link in your comment. Reddit's image hosting is garbage and makes it harder for your comment-readers to view what you're trying to show.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:03 PM
1

I'll repeat the obvious. We can not pretend like it's possible to end conscription. Every time a country indulges in such a fantasy they bring back conscription as soon as war approaches. It's entirely possible to end it. Change the minds of your neighbors, band together, and shoot back when they try to enslave you and yours. The use of real, accurate language is a great way to start. It's slavery. Not "conscription". Quit playing the slaver's word games. Look at Germany as an example. Let's not…
/r/MensRights22/06/24 12:36 PM
1

I understand the political maneuver. Expand an immoral thing to more people in hopes that more people will oppose said immoral thing. But, if you read the comments throughout this post, you'll see that even MRAs support the enslavement of people into combat, so long as it's not just men. To me, expanding an immoral thing is immoral and ought not be done. It needs to be ended.
/r/MensRights22/06/24 12:22 PM
1

You do realize that you're only talking about women between the ages of 18 and 26. Right? Once they aged out, they'd start rattling sabers again. And, frankly, young people aren't really the saber rattlers as it is. The people you'd need as allies are the 50yo+ crowd. We need everyone to see that the words "selective service", "draft", and "conscription" are just euphemisms for "slavery". I don't agree with accelerationism because it reduces freedom.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 09:17 PM
1

Are you pretending that the ruling aristocrats won't enslave women into factories, mines, support roles, and to the front line?
/r/MensRights21/06/24 08:15 PM
1

If we didn't have a corrupt government which gave itself a monopoly on advanced weaponry, it'd be different.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 04:51 PM
1

If the US was under active attack, you think people would just stand there like sheep? We're the most armed populace on the planet.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 04:21 PM
1

Then individuals and their chosen market defense options can decide whether it makes sense to mount a defense. If you think the only way you can be safe is to go around murdering people who might one day become a threat and enslaving your neighbors to do the murdering, you're a morally corrupt monster.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 02:38 PM
1

Negotiate with them in good faith... instead of all the corrupt bullshit that was going on a decade ago. Free trade builds partnerships. Corruption builds wars.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 02:22 PM
1

14 years in this house without incident. It may be awhile...
/r/MensRights21/06/24 12:57 PM
0

I'd wager it's a lot of fatherless cowards who bought into the statist bullshit in their public schools. They don't understand responsibility and freedom.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 04:50 AM
0

That's what I'm doing by trying to get this gaggle of idiots to use real language.
/r/MensRights21/06/24 02:02 AM
-2

I'd like to ensure nobody is enslaved into a draft more than I want some notion of equality.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 11:49 PM
1

Law = your "morality"
/r/MensRights20/06/24 11:13 PM
-1

Or, you can stop stealing, enslaving, and killing by proxy.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 10:52 PM
0

Signing up for Selective Service is like saying: "I'll go murder whoever you tell me for whatever reason you use to justify it."
/r/MensRights20/06/24 10:52 PM
2

Voluntarily pay for a professional defensive army?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 10:44 PM
0

I have to do it. It's done under duress. They'll kill me if I don't. Weak-minded slave. Grow the fuck up and learn how to make a basic argument.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 10:43 PM
1

"I will eat a human baby whenever you tell me to." - /u/KissMyAsthma-99
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:24 PM
1

Oh. See. That's the neat thing. They have and will enslave people into production, as well.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:23 PM
-2

If men were forced to eat a baby at the age of 20, you're saying that women should also be forced to eat a baby so that things are equal? Nevermind the wholly immoral act of eating the baby? Helping a violent nation state commit mass murder is definitely analogous.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:22 PM
0

We're talking about nation states. Outside rampant nationalism, cultures differ from the gangs which purport to control them.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:21 PM
0

The government extracts taxes from my paychecks, from point of sale transactions, etc. Being robbed by a violent gang is not a support of that gang.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:20 PM
3

I've observed the same. But, it's still enslavement and is still not okay. It should be resisted by all means possible.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:18 PM
1

Next, we tell the occupiers of our lands that they may not enslave us into their wars.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:17 PM
1

There's never a need to enslave anyone.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:16 PM
1

Speaking specifically of the US government, financial constraints left to get a pack of smokes years ago.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:15 PM
1

When you nearly double the supply of available soldiers, you can expect demand to increase.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:31 PM
-1

It's more like a mafia or a gang. https://www.usa.gov/
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:30 PM
0

I think a great first step is to challenge people's use of euphemisms which obscure the reality of things. There's no draft or conscription. It's slavery. I'd argue that it's a worse form of slavery than what occurred in the American South because it forces you to murder other slaves and puts you at high risk of death.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:29 PM
6

If a nation is worth protecting, the volunteers will be there. If there aren't enough volunteers, I say that's the most crucial vote and serves as a vote against the nation's leadership. Russia, Ukraine, and Israel are all enslaving people. I'm sure you can deduce my opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:53 PM
1

You: Apply for Mexican citizenship and renounce the US go live there. Also you: Work to change things. Fight the good fight Which is it?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:31 PM
-2

the present system allows women to exploit men by voting to send men to a war women will never be required to fight in It also allows men over the age of 26 to exploit young men. By your logic, we should argue to expand it to the age of 90 in order to dissuade Iowa's senator Chuck Grassley from voting younger men into combat.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:29 PM
1

What you've just described are self-defense situations. If the power structure of a region can't get enough volunteers to defend the region, then that's the most important vote of all and tells me that the people don't believe the power structure is worthy of defense. Such situations do not excuse the enslavement of men or women.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:00 PM
2

Nobody who voted for war and not subject to be drafted to said war should have voting rights to begin with. We vote for representatives. Not for war. It's a pretty stupid system which shields people from the responsibility of their choices. But, yeah. I agree. Folks need to put up or shut up.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:58 PM
4

https://i.imgur.com/tOZ25oV.png
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:57 PM
6

Forcing someone to work for you is slavery. Conscription is slavery. Forcibly extracting the value of one's labor is slavery.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:53 PM
-9

The theft-funding of government-affiliated schools is a form of slavery. Where force is used to coerce attendance, that's a form of kidnapping. The key word is "involuntary".
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:27 PM
1

There's an awful lot of slavery in there. Are you saying that because slavery is rampant, that it's okay?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:06 PM
-16

You just want to maintain the status quo. I'm simply against slavery in all its forms. If something isn't voluntary, then it's immoral.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:53 PM
3

Anarchist states are historically terrible Name three and explain what was "without rulers" about them. and inevitably become a more ordered state, under warlords if nothing else. Aye. Given that so few people value actual freedom, it's inevitable. Anarchism is an ideal but is likely unachievable with the animals we are. I'm unclear how you believe "rights" work. I have the natural right to defend myself, my family, and my community against aggression. This includes enslavement. It matters not w…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:52 PM
-1

Draft is just a needed fact. This is wrong. Not just factually but also morally. Slavery is not okay, even if you can construct some dipshitted argument for it.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:42 PM
0

Prove it. Besides, efficacy doesn't give you a right to tell other people how to live nor to take their stuff nor to enslave them into wars.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:40 PM
9

"military times" is a fun euphemism to hide the reality of what actually happens.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:39 PM
5

So, because a group of people are thieving, slaving murderers, I need to leave?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:29 PM
-85

So, you support slavery. Interesting.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:28 PM
-8

There shouldn't be a vote. You have no right to tell other people how to live nor to take their stuff nor to enslave them into wars.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:28 PM
5

Oh but it’s part of the deal with living in the society. I don't want to live in the society. The problem is that the society staked an illegitimate claim to all the land. You are 100%free to leave The whole fucking continent?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:17 PM
-168

Just don't fall into the trap of arguing for more slavery. ETA: The downvotes seem to indicate a lot of people who are either fine with nation states enslaving individuals or a bunch of weak, pathetic, vengeful assholes.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:50 PM
195

Nobody should be subjected to war slavery.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:23 PM
0

Statistics do not remotely bear this out my bro. Link to the statistics about women feeling safe and secure in relationships? ...and Chris Williamson is a scumbag grifter telling women what they want to hear because it's more profitable than the truth. I'm talking about Adam Lane Smith. I only recently discovered him. Everything he says matches my experience and research. /shrug
/r/MensRights23/01/24 03:05 PM
5

I've been married to my wife for 24 years. I've worked with several foster daughters, in their teens and again when they come back for adult advice. I've done quite a lot of study to try to better understand their negative impulses so that I can better help them.. The answer to your question, "I mean who the fuck does that?", in regards to women, is... basically all of them... if they don't feel safe and secure. If you were an alien studying the human animal, you'd have it listed in your compend…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:36 PM
6

Oxytocin. It's just basic female offspring and pair-bonding. Everyone whose face doesn't cause them to secrete Oxytocin is outside their circle. Males outside their circle are threats. The women who aren't just running their basic animal programming can actually cognate beyond their brain's reflexes. But, not all women, nor men, bother going far beyond "I'm a woodchuck and need to gnaw wood".
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:48 PM
24

Agreed. My buddies and I go to a rundown restaurant for our "men's breakfast" on Saturday mornings. The service is better and we're able to sit and talk for 3 hours without being rushed out the door. But, the trade-off is that everything's kinda crap, including the food. If we went to the breakfast restaurant with the best food, we'd be surrounded by women taking pictures of their plates and rude wait staff trying to turn the table.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 04:48 AM
8

If typical women ran the world, there wouldn't be enough cooperation to build and maintain a factory let alone to avoid large-scale violent conflict. Urban violence isn't an epidemic of motherlessness...
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:52 PM
4

UK. Not.Even.Once.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 11:06 PM
2

I was fortunate to be born and raised in Northeast Indiana. I don't like any politicians but the general culture is pro-family / anti-progressive. So, I've not had to face the issue as much as those in less-based states. I'd like to think I wouldn't just sit and be one of the frogs getting boiled. But, I wonder if I'd actually move if moving would put me into a better/safer/saner position.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 03:37 PM
37

If you live where this is happening... Pick one or more: Get socially active and try to unfuck your community Get politically active and try to unfuck your community Get geographically active and get the fuck out of there
/r/MensRights10/12/23 02:46 PM
4

If you can't un-monster him in two conversations about it, GTFO because people like that are really dangerous.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 09:17 PM
2

Life is about all of the destructive paths not taken. Good job stepping off of hers.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:47 PM
5

I'm 6'3" and still carry a knife and a pistol. There's nothing about being a naturally large male which negates attack... let alone fiddling about with one's hormones and changing one's clothes. Besides, why the hell would a grown-ass, responsible adult go around without the capacity to defend others? This is a good, responsible adult. Be one.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:06 PM
23

Because Western women have been conditioned to be helpless, useless, fragile, fearful, and pathetic creatures.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:54 AM
51

The simulation is called "protect and gain access to the eggs".
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:09 PM
3

Congratulations on your emancipation!
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:28 AM
6

Did Gillette move their headquarters?
/r/MensRights29/06/23 11:42 AM
13

"innocent until despite proven guilty" is a female right FTFY
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:28 AM
3

Only need about tree-fiddy.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 01:14 PM
2

If I was willing to bend over in submission for TSA, I would do something similar, but only because I need the extra room at 6'3" / 340lb. I couldn't imagine doing it just to be a self-righteous asshole. Peak narcissism.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 01:12 PM
18

Since time began.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:38 PM
4

In my experience, it's because they believe males are strong enough to deal with it. The partner of this belief, of course, is that females are too weak to deal with it. In my experience, most progressive/collectivist feminists have zero interest in equal gender treatment because they, at their core, believe that females are lesser and need their "heroic" assistance. The only people I've ever seen expect the same from a female as they would from a male are those who, politically, are staunch ind…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 11:30 AM
90

The article stated that she's a single mom. shock
/r/MensRights01/06/23 10:32 AM
7

"This empowered womin discovers hidden utility in the old ideas of modesty. Tomorrow, we explore whether chaperones might be the answer to modern rape culture." At least some of these idiots might finally be realizing why there used to be standards.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 04:51 AM
1

Or they have to be funny/witty, talented, especially charming, or have top 10% career prospects. Men propose. Women dispose. Stupidly, tall stature is enough proposition for many.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:37 PM
14

It's the same in Indiana. I'm 6'3", not particularly handsome, socially awkward AF, and had two dozen orbiters before I got married. Mind you, this was in the late '90s. No charm. No tact. Piss poor conversation skills. I was just tall, athletic, and had career prospects in CAD/CAM/CNC.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:34 AM
12

For example, if I said I wanted more male teachers, that would be okay. If I said I wanted more white teachers, it wouldn’t be as most are already white. Your first example: sexist Your second example: racist Be pro bipedal humanoid. Fuck off with the unnecessary differentiation.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:24 PM
12

This may be a useful thought exercise: Replace gender with race and consider how people would view it. If the organization's action or statement is positive for the represented <gender>, replace that <gender> with "white Caucasian" and think how the corporate media, Jessie Jackson, the NAACP, and SPLC would react. If the organization's action or statement is negative for the represented <gender>, replace that <gender> with "black African" and think how the corporate media, Jessie Jackson, the NA…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:09 PM
13

Yep. He was an idiot. She was evil.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:35 AM
31

he was the judge assigned to her case, and got her pregnant while the case was still ongoing The kid isn't his. Agreed on all else.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:06 AM
21

Slavery into war is way worse than slavery into labor.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:29 AM
8

Being fat shows that you are lazy and lack self-respect to take care of your own body. This isn't universally true, though there's a high correlation. It can also have a lot to do with how one's parents malnourished them. Short stature can have the same roots. In general, both can be caused by bad parenting. Only one can be caused by bad adulting. Making assumptions about individuals makes you an asshole either way.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:21 AM
9

And some rich men sit in their Bentlys and lament that women show more interest in them when they're not driving their late model F150s. In other news, another feminist is shocked about biology.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 11:48 AM
1

So sorry to hear about this, OP. To everyone else: Take this as a good reminder of why there used to be chaperones. The danger of false accusation hasn't gone away. It's just that the progressive boomers tried to pretend the danger doesn't exist. Insist on chaperones unless/until you're in a committed relationship or enjoy taking risks. Just don't pretend the risks aren't there and then go all surprisedpikachuface.jpg when the shit hits the fan.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:51 PM
1

After a couple of days, I wonder how many upvoters understand that taxation is a form of slavery. . .
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:36 PM
36

Financial autonomy is bodily autonomy. Not owning the negotiated product of one's voluntary labor is called slavery.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 03:58 AM
2

Talented trolls are hard to come by these days.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 12:14 PM
8

I own zero fedoras, have been married for 23 years, and say that the comment you so-cleverly replied to is 100% correct. F these throwaway account pieces of shit...
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:59 AM
6

Men must be made to feel bad because some women were mistreated 80 years ago or something. Never mind that the majority of "Western" women have been told they're princesses for the entirety of my 45-year life while I've known multiple men whose lives have ended due to the ramifications of sexist government institutions and a lack of support. Never mind the widespread support of a nation state that is currently enslaving "its" men into its war (Ukraine). You needn't look further than to movies to…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:19 AM
2

I don't take many breaks and, yeah, about 9 to 10 hours per day. I have the blue filter coating on my glasses. But, I was joking. My risks are a lot lower than a lot of tradesmen.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:45 PM
2

The cost of access to either has vastly increased and potential access to either has been heavily reduced since.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:26 PM
1

Does eye strain from CAD/CAM count?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:43 PM
4

(mainly nursing and teaching being underpaid professions that require high qualifications) Gotta love that regulatory capture perpetrated by the AMA and teacher unions...
/r/MensRights05/03/23 01:41 PM
1

Conscription is slavery. Taxation is in the grey area between theft and slavery. Regulators are uninvited third parties tyrannizing otherwise voluntary actors. Any political grouping larger than a city state is guaranteed tyranny. If something isn't voluntary, then it's immoral. Stick that on the stupid, low-res left/right scale wherever you think it fits.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:45 PM
1

Then you're probably happier than most people, particularly those who rushed into bad relationships. I'm 45yo with 23yrs unequally yoked so far. I bet I'd be happier if I'd achieved Step 1.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:45 AM
4

Like I told my cousin after drug-jail and halfway house: Step 1: Be happy by and with yourself Step 2: Find someone who makes you even happier Step 3: Make sure you didn't lie to yourself in Step 1 Step 4: Make sure you didn't lie to yourself in Step 2 Step 5: Be happier Don't skip any steps. When you actually accomplish Step 1, the subject of Step 2 almost certainly finds you. If you feel like you have to hunt, you probably haven't finished Step 1.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 10:50 PM
2

supporting Ukraine is about supporting a sovereign country ...which denies men their bodily autonomy. They can get fucked, as far as I'm concerned. Russia too. Of course. But, I rarely encounter anyone so stupid as to require me to say the latter.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:17 AM
2

Broad support for man-enslaving Ukraine ought to be plenty of evidence that people don't value men.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:16 PM
3

woman is 64 - she needs to retire She wasn't a stunner 40 years ago but the MTV craze pumped her ego to stratospheric heights. Celebrity worshippers destroy people.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:42 AM
6

Evasion of capture and self-defense are the right of all creatures. A "draft" doesn't make enslavement moral.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:41 AM
2

Imagine being upset because someone cared enough to ensure you possess certain knowledge. I "overexplain" mission-relevant information routinely. I'll keep going until the dumb look vacates the face, signaling comprehension. Yes, women in my life more often possess said dumb look and hold it at least twice longer than men in my life. I think it's because men are expected to know a vast array of things while most women are not. I propose a deal: If you know the four cycles of a 4-stroke internal …
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:21 PM
5

An oversupply of single men is usually a signal to states that it's time for another total-war.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:28 AM
14

women are still getting cat called in today's day and age because so many men on this thread are defending it. Maybe it's regional/cultural but in my 44 years in the Midwest, I've never witnessed a woman being catcalled a single time. Is this just a problem among trash-ass bar scene people or is it made up?
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:09 AM
1

Which demigods do you choose to worship after finding that your previous demigod had let you down?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:22 PM
1

Why even bother listening to people's words then? We're all hypocrites. Is this a recent revelation for you? Did you once believe Peterson to be perfect and infallible or something?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 07:20 PM
1

If you can't find wisdom among hypocrisy, then you won't find wisdom.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:18 AM
6

Feminists propaganda or what? All of it, really. It wasn't even expressly "Yay Ra 'Murica!". It just had "token female pilot" with a few one-liners like an average 80s movie would.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:16 PM
45

The new Top Gun was pretty good. No more of The Message in it than in a lot of 80s movies.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:09 PM
5

I'm fully aware of the tyrannical social engineering underlying the situation. But, all of the assholes who go along with it can get fucked sideways. They aren't exonerated just because they're allowing themselves to be manipulated.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:19 PM
15

I remember that one time I grew up in a 12ft wide mobile home with abusive parents, didn't go to college, and tried to start a tool & die career in the midst of the NAFTA, ChinaWTO, DotCom, 9/11 economic crash and offshoring extravaganza. Sure is fun having all of this fucking power. Yup. Literally 100% of the people with the racist and sexist outlook of that little billboard can get 100% fucked sideways.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:14 PM
2

Sex is painful and unenjoyable when you surpass the mutilator's presumption. There's zero excuse for performing it upon infants.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:35 AM
5

Evade or kill your would-be enslavers.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:21 PM
4

They'll penetrate you with needles and physical examination.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:20 PM
3

If you're in the US, pay a visit to your state and federal representatives as well as your state's attorney general. That's 5 people who should help you find justice. If none are willing to help, check with your local sheriff to see if he'll protect you from this theft. Some might. Either way, find a government which will protect you from these predations. I wonder if anyone has already found a reliable way to solve this problem.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:10 PM
5

Oh. Good. Now the statistically-safe assumption will be that any woman on a company's board is just there for because of the quota. I'm sure that'll be empowering...
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:37 PM
4

Who's this "we"? Many people have been bringing this up since Columbine. Doesn't make people more reproductively-responsible, though.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:45 AM
1

I keep fluted solid copper in my pistols for similar reason. Stop the threat but don't make a doctor dig for 10 fragments. My 300 BLK has Controlled Chaos in it, though. If I'm using that, I want maximum energy dump.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 11:25 AM
-1

If you believe that, you believe that they are quick, coordinated, and efficient. I don't believe that what has been happening for decades federally nor globally is accidental. I also don't believe that the suits in front of cameras are calling the shots. I believe that the underlying power elites ARE quick, coordinated, and efficient. IMO, we saw that on the night of November 3, 2020... not that "the other guy" is a selfless hero of legend or anything.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:00 PM
32

I want my son to look like me This one is truly baffling.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:59 PM
0

I'm sure being called goofy every encounter would diminish ur self worth If I was sensitive? Maybe. When you're freakishly proportioned your whole life, you just go with it. The problem isn't that people jest. It's that people allow their "self worth" to be changed by acquaintances. people told me I was going bald for years, its there fault it fucken happened they made me believe it. The bastards Science, bitches! rofl
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:08 PM
3

I'm fine with all obvious descriptors. "Big, tall, goofy lookin' dude" is a valid descriptor of me. Add my shirt color and you're certain to find me among a crowd of a thousand. People who get upset about the description of their obvious physical traits are assholes. Funnily enough, you could probably just say "the asshole" and most people in their circles would know who you're referring to.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:21 PM
21

US Nationwide: Income taxes Inheritance taxes Capital gains taxes Selective Service Child Support Fines and imprisonment for peaceful actions US Some States: Sales transaction taxes Income taxes Property taxes Inventory taxes Alimony (adult child) Support Our governments are engaging in fractional-enslavement on so many levels that the duration of human gestation is an absolutely minor inconvenience by comparison. Not only that but pregnancy is entirely avoidable while Selective Service and taxe…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:46 PM
6

And they'll probably still lose.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:06 AM
6

We still have idiots that don't understand that no means no The IRS, for example...
/r/MensRights29/04/22 07:22 PM
1

I treat equally-respectful and equally-competent women like human beings equal in value to myself. The women who are markedly less-respectful often earn slurs while markedly less-competent women are categorized as adult-sized children who cannot be trusted with responsibilities. To be perfectly clear, I sub-categorized men in precisely the same way. The key difference being, however, that it's really rare that I need to sub-categorize men while women tend to clog the drain.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:30 PM
2

Aye. Her father has negligently killed more people than 99.9% of American gun owners while being vocally and ignorantly anti-gun.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 12:29 AM
11

Interesting as her father seems bit odd… The highly vocal anti-gun activist who has negligently injured and murdered more people than the millions of armed Americans whom he has repeatedly maligned? Odd indeed.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:09 PM
10

Unless of course she's a cabinet. I've seen her acting. Such claim could be credible.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:04 PM
1

That would be: "If you're in the US, 18 to 25yo, male, didn't file for exemption, and completed the form such that you were able to renew your driver's license between the ages of 18 to 25, then you unwillingly signed up for a similar thing." I know of nothing which is both tied to a driver's license and is the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:22 PM
1

Pieces of shit on both sides. The good people are suffering. The men are doing so without much of a voice.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:37 AM
1

If you're in the United States and you have a drivers license, you signed up for the exact same thing. What?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:06 AM
16

Because invading army...
/r/MensRights06/03/22 12:09 PM
124

Let me tell you about taxes and "social programs"...
/r/MensRights05/06/21 11:55 AM
7

Forced omission from work has nothing to do with the dynamic. That's a problem of tyrants leveraging social and governmental systems to put their thumbs on people. It doesn't mean that there's a problem with the dynamic.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 07:50 PM
5

I know a duck who identifies as a dog.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:22 PM
8

More like 2-5 years.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:05 AM
1

Low key play her game. Save whatever money you can. Seek positive male role models IRL. Decide a reasonable career plan which is achievable without familial support. Move when you can. Nothing positive can come from someone so toxic.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:14 PM
3

If they aren't for equality, they aren't your friends. Same goes for the people who think you should be aggressed-against by the state for peaceful actions.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:36 PM
2

Apart from slavery and/or incarceration, all relationships are voluntary. Choose wisely.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 11:50 AM
18

bullied as a kid and had a traumatic childhood Oh, shit! Did this just become the next "I get to do what I want" group? I might actually make the cut on this one!
/r/MensRights06/03/21 11:40 AM
3

Sadly, it'll be the only way to "reconcile" with the thieving ideologies of collectivism and gynocentrism. I wish people would just stop taking from others.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 12:07 PM
1

college isn't tax payer funded, it's a business ...
/r/MensRights22/02/21 12:04 PM
1

Oh, I agree with you there. That further supports the idea that there's no reason to force participation via enslavement.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 11:54 PM
1

WTF does that have to do with it? Are you trying to say that if they'd enslaved their own populace into the military, things would've been just and necessary?
/r/MensRights03/02/21 11:10 PM
1

If it's a just and necessary war, there'll be plenty of volunteers. If people don't volunteer, then you don't get to go play war. 537 corrupt people don't get to decide who goes into a meat grinder. Fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 10:43 PM
1

it isn't forever https://www.nytimes.com/1970/02/12/archives/onethird-of-americans-killed-in-vietnam-war-are-draftees.html#:~:text=WASHINGTON%2C%20Feb.,1969%2C%20was%20killed%20in%20action. WASHINGTON, Feb. 11—The war in Vietnam has claimed more than 12,000 deaths among draftees, most of them in the army, the Pentagon said today. Fuck off ghoul.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 10:15 PM
1

They're precisely the same. No person has a right to the labor and efforts of another person outside of voluntary, non-coerced, fully-conscious contracts.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 10:12 PM
1

Many slaves were paid. It's the 'by force' part that's the problem.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 10:01 PM
1

Drafts are slavery. Nobody should be forced against their will.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 12:59 AM
14

Susceptibility to media manipulation, probably.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 02:28 AM
26

Most women have gladly met society's low expectations of them.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 02:00 AM
157

Man: Has 10 fish. Woman: Has 4 fish and 10 bread. Woman: "We should both have 7 fish. Give me three of his fish." Man: "What about bread? Can I have some bread?" Society: "Quit being a toxic piece of shit!!!!!!REEEEEE"
/r/MensRights27/01/21 05:03 PM
9

there is a seriously large problem in regards to rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment. Nearly every girl I know has experienced one of the three at some point What % would you guess are attention-seeking falsities trying to "fit in" with the current feminist culture? If it's such a problem, why aren't women insisting on chaperones in their lives? The only women I know who've had the problem are those who had shitty drunkard single moms who paraded shitty drunkard boyfriends through their …
/r/MensRights20/01/21 12:47 PM
15

I'm 43yo and haven't done these things either. My only "male privilege" was growing up in a trailer park to abusive parents under the expectation that I'd be a useful human being. I chose my vocation (CAD drafter / tooling engineer) before I was 10yo. I pursued it heavily, attending ITT Tech after HS. I worked that career for 5 years. Then Clinton pushed NAFTA and steel trade with China and killed the industry. Lots of bouncing around later and I ended up in the trade show industry. Enter the 20…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 12:32 PM
2

Looks like it's time to identify as a female candidate.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 07:36 PM
7

There are reasons we used to have a chaperone setup. The reasons aren't dissimilar to why you require additional witnesses for marriages and mortgages. One word versus another cannot be reconciled without a witness.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 06:51 PM
2

It's not just that people want it that way. They very well might. But, that's precisely how our public schools packaged and distributed it. We learned to eat what we were force-fed. I kept eating it until, at age 30, my attention was caught by Ron Paul during his 2008 POTUS campaign. It's been a helluva rabbit hole. I fell all the way down past "libertarianism", through "minarchism", to "voluntaryism" aka "anarcho-capitalism" aka "non-aggression principle". I'm a Christian who believes that you …
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:48 AM
2

Yep. Regression-to-the-mean is real. Unexplained outliers are real. There's no known causal relationship between genetics and intelligence (outside medical abnormalities). I'd sooner suspect family structure or nutrition differences. My fervent hope is that the general cause would be something we can fix humanely and positively.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:29 AM
2

Many of them have been, in several battles over the past 100 years. Yet, the ideas still remain. I'm all for studying macro-level mental acuity with the goal of determining causes of lower intellect. Genetics? Gestational choices? Early development? Nutrition? Language style? Numerous studies have proven that the average divergence occurs before entry into school systems. It'd be really damned useful to know what's going on. Maybe we'd find a couple of literal "life hacks" which would help milli…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:25 AM
2

I don't think it's 3 dudes with a plan, if that's what you mean. I think it's a core ideology being carried out by hundreds of thousands of would-be-aristocrats, acting in small-group self-interest, aided by useful-idiots who buy into their general marketing hype in a desire to feel good about "doing good" with other people's money.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:04 AM
1

The story goes that they're aiming to wipe out the lower intelligence peoples while also effecting population control. But, since it's in the realm of conspiracy theories, we're straying toward Alex Jones territory here and cannot find generally-accepted-as-credible sources. I'd have to write a book to put together my personal geopolitical observations which led me to believe this is credible (credible =/= proven, ofc). Personally, I'm okay with knowing how to identify a collectivist group and k…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:00 AM
1

It's for the same reason that Planned Parenthood targets predominantly black neighborhoods. Racist Eugenics.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:55 AM
1

No, sorry, the Boer situation is Bolshevist. There's decent evidence of sterilization of blacks throughout Africa, including SA.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:36 AM
2

Nope. Sterilization programs scattered throughout. The South African Boer situation is more Bolshevist.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:33 AM
2

And while they’re doing that, they have the time to push “education” that more or less denigrates men as being evil or privileged alongside other things that ironically hurt minorities in the long run Their goal is to subjugate people. Destruction of the church and the family in the West. Destruction of tradition in the East. Literal Eugenics in Africa. So, it isn't just a MRA issue. It's a basic liberty issue.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:29 AM
1

Human action without profit motive is destined for failure. Nowhere is this more evident than in our over-funded, wholly-useless public education disaster. But, this is what you can expect when collectivists tell fairytales about mass-altruism all-the-while they're coercively extracting the product of people's labor in order to fund their failing pet projects. I don't just dislike public education. I think it's the core mechanism for the destruction of peaceful individualism and voluntary intera…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:09 AM
0

It isn't a matter of form-factor. It's a matter of the funding and administration. Demanding liberties from a coercively-funded, fundamentally-collectivist institution is asinine.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:01 AM
-2

Stop public schools. Private contracts can cover this shit.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 10:02 PM
41

As a hetero-married, mid-40s, white-skinned, male who grew up in an abusive mobile home environment and doesn't have a college degree, these fucking entitled scum had better be at the end of their screeching bullshitery. There are real problems in the world and these selfish fuckers are in the way of solving them.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:03 AM
2

Strangely, the collectivists appear to be blind followers.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:19 PM
9

dictator wannabe trump Wut? He's constantly criticized for not exercising dictatorial power...
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:10 PM
18

I ditched them right after the commercial. I tried Schick and Bic but didn't like the trimmer blades. I ended up trying Harry's and am quite happy with it.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 12:44 AM
2

If this happened in my community, this would make me oppositionally defiant.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 07:15 PM
13

Helps to explain how women's entry into democracy may have spurred massive global conflicts. White feather, anyone?
/r/MensRights03/10/20 11:40 AM
1

"Rape is only a problem because people don't grow up and get over it." -Thoughts From Heartless Simpletons, Volume II
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:06 PM
66

Particularly those in the middle-aged, middle-class, paying child support, working 60 hours per week segment. Wait, why is there a suicide epidemic?
/r/MensRights28/08/20 03:26 AM
26

"We've determined that people of your race and gender are prone to . . ." is the language of bigots. This university's leaders are bigots.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 03:40 PM
2

She sounds exhausting. Shit has to get done. Work with your partner to share the load.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 03:17 PM
6

Voluntary association would be best.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 11:08 AM
15

I've always said I'd rather live under a community-focused, local mafia than the US government.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 10:57 AM
0

I do believe that, with the combination of a lidless seat and a bitching Karen, the guaranteed-correct states-of-being can be either: Down and piss-covered Removed and leaned against the wall Pick one and continue doing your job.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 12:06 PM
1

Small businesses rarely pay minimum wage because they hire more capable workers. Have you ever worked in a factory, though?
/r/MensRights06/08/20 03:37 AM
2

Oh, sorry, misread. True captains of industry.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 12:03 AM
1

8 employees between two businesses? Yeah, you know how boutiques work. That's nowhere near the same. But, please wax poetic about the $60k salary you pay the guy who mops the floor in your competitive business.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:59 PM
1

That's not to mention that one shouldn't expect full independence if the only value they can provide to the market is worth $7.25/hr. That's mouth-breathing, group-home-living, remedial shit right there. You're worth what you can negotiate for in the market. If you're of even near-average mental and/or physical ability, you should be absolutely and utterly ashamed if you're making $7.25/hr as a grown-ass adult. People who think it should be a "living wage" are too stupid to realize that they're …
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:05 PM
3

I don't think you understand how business works.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:54 PM
4

That's what minimum wage should be. You're willing to pay $24.80/hr to a guy who packages your product?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:55 PM
20

$24.80 for basic, unskilled work? Hahahahhhaaaaaaaahhh! They'd better go ahead and get started on adding import taxes because nobody will produce a damned thing there.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:04 PM
7

Am Gen X ('77) and agree. Most of Gen X thinks it. Most Xers who are married don't seem to see the importance, though, and have trouble connecting the dots with the entitled brats (Karens, blue-hairs, & wormy-incels) around them.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:52 AM
4

I don't derive morality from legality. That age disparity is unhealthy, regardless what some parchment says somewhere. That said, it's not a situation where the use of force is necessary. Though, I'll go ahead and levy shame upon the elder participant, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 02:50 AM
1

It's a lazy crosspost. Doesn't make sense unless you find the tiny crosspost icon in whichever viewer you're using. Your comment made me scour my Reddit Is Fun view for it. That said, even after finding it, this is pretty lame. OP lazy.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 11:50 AM
2

the social construct that is the patriarchy That's from the chemtrails, right?
/r/MensRights10/07/20 12:58 AM
2

Wondered. Thanks for breaking it down. I figured it wasn't actual racism. Racism is the new "priest" class's "heresy". Nobody expects the BLM Inquisition...
/r/MensRights07/06/20 03:20 AM
3

27% of crimes are committed by blacks. It shouldn't be surprising that 23% of the people killed by police are black. In fact, you'd think it might be closer to 27%... IMO, this is just a corrupt, centralized power problem. I suggest folks read the 10th Amendment and really let it sink in. Then start thinking about how important your state and local laws are. Nothing about the US Constitution lays out a framework for geographic security monopolies. And that's what law enforcement agencies are. Mo…
/r/MensRights03/06/20 02:36 PM
3

If anyone whines about anything which isn't the initiation of fraud or force, they can have a nice warm glass of shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:01 AM
1

I don't even know what she just said. Sounded like something about sitting on ass at home, clumsily taking about 20 hours to perform about 10 hours of basic household upkeep tasks each week while whining about how nice it must be to die earlier from the stress of carving out an income in a competitive marketplace. Is my translator working? Surely no grown-ass adult can be that fucking entitled. Right?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:40 AM
5

In other news, employers bother to employ employees whom they feel they cannot be honest with.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:55 AM
13

teenage girls that aren’t even in a steady relationship and they already know men are gonna pay for everything they want the rest of their lives until their sexual market value dries up and they're tossed to the side as otherwise-unvaluable moneysinks. FTFY, sadly. Be sure to raise your daughters under higher expectations than society levies so that their sole value isn't feigned fertility signals and bedmates.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 07:44 PM
6

These guys 'smell' like the sort who are doing this because they got caught looking at porn or cheating on their obese Karen wives.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:41 AM
2

RIGHT: More likely to pee while standing and to sling urine everywhere LEFT: More likely to sling period blood and vaginal juice while removing a tampon [1] BOTH: Shit. Shit everywhere In single stall restrooms, these should be the only factors for differentiation just so that one sort isn't grossed out by the disgusting lack of care of the other sort. It'd almost be better to just label one "Hygienic & Courteous Gentlefolk" and the other "Gross Pieces of Shit". But, if we're not going to differ…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:25 PM
35

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:51 PM
13

That'd be great. It also would've been great to extend the same to Bill Clinton, Trump, and Kavanaugh (for examples).
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:26 AM
1

Yeah. Jesus' teachings are all about it but most of them have no clue, sadly.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:04 PM
1

I know there are many exceptions. But, the vast majority of atheists are all about concentrating power into centralized authorities. So much so that it could be described as their religion in many cases. My inclusion of "Christians" was just a religious comparison. Most American "Christians" are full-on statists, too.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:47 PM
1

Please explain how I equated them.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:32 PM
0

I don't think you understand what I just said. And I'm not libertarian, I'm a voluntaryist.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:24 PM
-1

Atheists are almost always statists. The idea of government acting on false accusations goes against their statist religion. Saying to them that someone can be wrongly convicted by the state is like saying that God isn't real to a Christian. You're an anomaly in that circle.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:04 PM
2

Agreed. If you want to use the power of my state to handle your personal problems, then I want my state to ensure that its power is being used wisely. I'd prefer that people took responsibility and made a contract with each other before creating life, though.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:03 PM
15

And 17 women accusing Trump is just all made up evidence? Accusations are, by their very definition, not evidence. Did any evidence accompany any of those accusations or were they all like Kavanaugh's situation?
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:38 PM
13

He said they'd let you do whatever you want. That's a far cry from saying that he can do whatever he wants. Head out of ass.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 06:30 PM
12

That's because there was direct video evidence.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 06:29 PM
5

What the other guy said (about what H.Clinton actually said). Third Wave Feminists™, and those who pander to them, are all about how women are negatively impacted by hardships which are primarily borne by men. Here's another example of some witty push back against this shit. https://i.imgur.com/x2qLHAE.png
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:19 PM
173

It really is like a war...
/r/MensRights29/03/20 06:27 PM
2

I had a female teacher who called on me too often in class. Clearly all women are trash. /s
/r/MensRights27/03/20 05:46 PM
1

Nope. I'm pointing out that once you get away from the campuses, femtox is drastically reduced.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:23 PM
1

That isn't America. That's a campus. Completely different kinda place.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:21 PM
1

Men already have laws about their bodies. If a man fathers a child, he'll almost surely have approximately 30% to 50% of his labor redirected to the mother of that child if he doesn't capitulate to her preferred rules of cohabitation. Men have no say in what happens after conception. They're just along for whichever ride the mother chooses for them.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 04:41 PM
26

She thinks she's making a clever parody of anti-abortion beliefs.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 12:22 PM
0

sheseemsnice.gif
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:08 PM
2

The Game of Tribalism: Gender Edition
/r/MensRights10/02/20 07:44 PM
2

The 2090s will look like pre-Fallout 4.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 03:05 PM
6

In other news, UK grocers begin debating whether to double the price of feminine hygiene products or to discontinue supply.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:08 AM
6

That's a matter of price fixing. The problem is inherent in "socialist" economic schemes, affecting whichever products see price controls. Same goes for fuel and water during/after a climate disaster. Low/zero pricing leads to lack of supply. Econ 101 right there. Dwindling gasoline supplies go up to $80/gallon 200 miles from me after a disaster? Guess which guy is filling the bed of his truck with gas cans and taking a trip to supply vital resources for profit?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:05 AM
3

This broad brush isn't quite accurate. But, little is expected of many girls and they grow up to meet those low expectations.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:38 AM
2

Some people want so badly to feel insulted and superior that they're happy to misunderstand basic language in order to reinforce their ego-driven narratives.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:35 PM
5

Reading comprehension is fundamental.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 04:53 PM
6

I've been married for 20 years and do not disagree with the person you replied to. Society and families expect very little of their daughters who, it turns out, are quite happy to oblige. I work in manufacturing on the product development, engineering, CAD, CAM, and CNC side of things, not to mention management of office and factory IT systems. First, in 24 years, I've not yet worked with a white collar woman who wasn't secretarial, marketing, accounting, or HR. Second, even within their own fie…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 03:07 PM
196

You can smell the type from 10 yards and hear the shrillness from 50 yards. Visually identifiable by a notable physical similarity to Danny DeVito's Penguin, but with 90s comedian Carrot Top's untamed hair [1]. Note [1]: Actual color of hair may vary. Hair is likely suffering from a string of bad home-dye jobs.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:17 AM
3

The poster is saying that 18yo males are men with agency and 18yo females are helpless girls without agency. Perhaps if Jake had been aware of this poster's (and many feminists') Victorian beliefs, he'd have thought to request/purchase consent from Josie's father/pimp/owner/male-authority. /eyeroll AKA feminists like these are fucking disgusting, sexist trash.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 10:06 AM
1

When you take money from others under the guise of providing a "necessary" service in a monopolistic manner, you should do everything possible to ensure that you're hiring the best possible people for the lowest possible price. Using tax money to hire based on Gender/Color/Toilet-Paper-Over:Under quotas is shameful pandering and, were there justice, should lead to immediate termination and public shaming. There's a job to be done. Best service at lowest cost, please.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 04:01 PM
4

Drafter and CNC programmer, here. My family lives comfortably and I don't have to: Manage other people Lie to anyone Worry about irrelevance Obtain government permissions It's also compatible with a major joint issue I live with.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:45 AM
0

Explain to me where I allocated blame.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 06:46 PM
-6

When I say abstinence, I include vigilant self defense. Though, it's not hard to avoid the situation you've presented if you're not "playing in the water".
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:36 PM
7

Men only have one choice. Abstinence.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:17 AM
3

Maybe they're trying to turn the wage gap myth into a reality?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:48 PM
9

The most empowering thing one can do is to call things by their proper names. After seeing the other guy's statement, a more accurate name for "rabid feminists" was known to me. Simply put, they believe women are superior and should have a higher positioning than men. They don't aim for equality of opportunity. They want things tilted in their favor. They're, accurately put, female supremacists. They're no better than today's KKK members. Some are even more violent than today's KKK.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 05:10 PM
8

In some states, you can record everything where you are. Basic one-party-consent. What you can't do is zero-party-consent in private rooms you do not own or are leasing/renting/loaning.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:58 PM
12

Indiana welcomes you. Be sure to pick up a lifetime licence to carry a handgun as you enjoy our relative freedoms and economic prosperity. Just... don't go to Gary... 'tis a Chicago place.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:55 PM
34

The cult of female supremacy I'm now going to begin substituting "female supremacist" in place of "feminist".
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:53 PM
17

East Asians have, on average, above average IQs so they don't count in the Oppression Olympics. Know what's harder than Chinese algebra? An Asian man getting into an ivy league school...
/r/MensRights22/08/19 11:35 AM
1

in Canada we know our taxes are used relatively transparently, with our free health care and many local services and social services. Don't dig into the amount of waste and corruption. You'll become suddenly less blissful than you are today. Meanwhile, I'll continue paying taxes for health facilities in the US so that disaffected Canadian citizens can come utilize them to work around the failings of your system.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:44 PM
1

I see, I'm assuming you don't see any benefits to your contributions since you seem pretty displeased with it. Oh, the mafia does make sure the streets are cleaned up and the shops look nice. But, it's still theft by a mafia and isn't voluntary association. I don't think that I get $2,500/mo of beneficial service from my governments. In fact, they stand in the way of good service by pushing profit-motivated free enterprises out of the transportation, education, and healthcare sectors (to name a …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:34 PM
1

I don't think that's how it works I didn't just take the base percentages, forgetting deductions, as it seems you're assuming. Rather, the various levels of geographic monopolies on the use of force, all together, soak up about 40% of my income each year. I'm left with about 60% of my income after all levels of robbery are accounted.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:07 PM
3

You get taxed 40%? Doesn't that mean you make over half a million dollars a year? I'm speaking of my effective overall tax rate for Federal, State, County, and City. Federal Income Tax State Income Tax County Income Tax Social Security Tax (employee half) Social Security Tax (employer half, factored as a de facto salary reduction) Property Tax State Sales Tax 7% for normal goods County Sales Tax of 1% for prepared foods Federal/State/County Taxes baked into and passed along in the cost of the go…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:59 PM
-2

They'd put me in prison or a coffin because I refuse to be more of a slave than my current ~40% taxation.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:37 PM
1

Who raised these mass shooters? Poorly chosen mates =/= fathers. Failure to provide a father figure =/= responsible. Tossing young men into feminized schools =/= raising. If these shooters had had strong, positive male role models in their lives, I all but guarantee they'd be productive members of their communities and not attention-whores impotently gunning down people in touchy-feely gun-free zones.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:01 PM
1

Our they can be paid what they're willing to work for.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:33 PM
1

Use the lid ya disgusting, piss-spreading heathens.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:25 PM
4

That's how my wife and I do it. No plumes of pisswater getting everywhere.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:22 PM
1

Too many people are terrible drivers too. Unfortunately, society at large doesn't allow for making people "feel bad" about being complete shit at some very basic things. Public education needs to be deleted from existence and parents need to start being parents again instead of offloading their most basic responsibilities to disinterested strangers.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:19 PM
3

I'm not gorgeous.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:36 PM
4

I trust everyone with firearms until they've proven to be adult-sized children. Belief otherwise is necessarily totalitarian.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:58 PM
11

Depends whether their family and friends have enabled them to persist into adulthood as an irresponsible child or not. Not all women have been infantilized.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:48 PM
5

I'm 6'3" and live in a nice area but carry a pistol anyhow. No reason to go through life unequiped to protect your community. These scared women should get trained and do the same.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:09 AM
2

Women can drop their 3yo off at a fire station without repercussion.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:33 AM
10

Dark-mode with RES = no text unless opened in another window. https://i.imgur.com/kpztzcU.png Might wanna try again without a transparent background (at least).
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:52 AM
3

I won't play global thermonuclear war and I won't spend time alone with a woman who isn't my wife. Both are losing games.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 09:02 PM
1

You had no choice. The soldier signed up to do unconscionable acts for a corrupt government then got butt-hurt about it. YOU have my deepest sympathies. Draftees (slaves) do as well. Volunteers do not.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 10:51 AM
21

Whedon will be in his bunk, trying to find new ways to white knight without getting smacked with #MeToo.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:38 PM
101

Ah! Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:12 PM
6

Could you go take a peek at the VW plant to make sure the new SUVs don't have gun turrets?
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:29 PM
17

Women shouldn't suffer consequences because they're little children who can't be held responsible for their actions but they're fully equal and strong and empowered but everything's the man's fault because they couldn't have possibly known better. ...in other words, they'll ride both sides of the line for their benefit as it suits them.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:29 PM
9

I don't trust the state to issue traffic citations. No fucking way should they be killing subdued people who aren't an active threat.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:26 PM
7

Wow. Might wanna keep a close eye on the health and well-being of any nearby Jews and other "undesirables". Maybe check up on the local VW plant for us.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:25 PM
34

If your 6yo is able to elicit such a response by words alone, then you should seek counselling.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:23 PM
2

I missed a great pun. My shame is eternal. Thanks for picking up my fumble. :)
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:43 PM
22

I LOL'd in a hospital waiting room. There's been an intersectional collision. Someone call an ambulance!
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:53 PM
1

You're a second class citizen with no rights regarding your reproduction outside of absolute celibacy. Once you've entered a relationship, your rights are forfeit. Yes, you should be real with your friends and family and urge them to vote for sheriffs, judges, and executives who appoint judges and will actually instate equality. Until then, be sure not to stick your dick in uncommitted.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:35 PM
3

That's a healthy scare which should keep you safe.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:32 PM
24

I think the whole problem is singling out an individual. I have a coder doing work for my idea currently. I go out of my way to give him the credit whenever possible and he does the same for me. Anyone who solo basks in the glory of a team project is a douche. "Project lead" is just the person on the carrier deck directing traffic in a lot of cases. It's their job to make sure the planes don't run into each other or fall off the deck. It's a very important role. But, it's no more important than …
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:06 PM
7

Doesn't matter. It isn't the money that is the issue. It is equality and fairness. If you can't respect women with equal pay, how can you say you respect them at all? Anecdote Warning: I've never ever ever witnessed anyone treat a female employee differently than they treat a male employee until the female employee differentiates herself by being less capable, weaker, or less available when the job needs doing. I've seen several female employees who've not shown any of those inequities and do qu…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 05:27 PM
1

just like a woman Found the 250 IQ genius.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 02:01 AM
1

Wow you have a super high opinion of yourself. I wonder what it's like going through life with delusions of grandeur fighting off tyranny with muh gun. Replace "muh gun" with "about 100 million other patriotic gun owners for the benefit of servile cattle like /u/Kravego". The words "well-regulated militia" just don't exist apparently. ORLY? The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in p…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 09:46 PM
1

No? Fuck outta here with your bullshit. Then what were you talking about? Disarmament .......... > Genocide/Democide. That's the timeline. Time and time again. How do you propose to avoid it without arms? Comparing settlers, who were faced with dangerous wildlife and attack from native populations, to modern day Susan going to grocery store is fucking hilarious. When did I say I need my firearms because of wild animals? Though...that's still applicable in much of the US landmass. I need my firea…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:58 PM
1

Don't be dense. I'm saying that wielding the power to effortlessly end the life of everyone around you in a short amount of time has only been around for a little bit (circa ww2) https://phys.org/news/2014-12-short-history-arson.html From the 1790s, in Britain and around the world, arson became an increasingly frequent weapon of rural protest. Burnings peaked during poor harvests and in areas of high unemployment. Are you arguing that governments, who murdered 250+ Million of their own citizens …
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:30 PM
1

Then you must be new here. Where? You mean internet people? They're 13. Ignore them. As if the concepts of child rearing and carrying a weapon are synonymous. One has been ingrained in our dna over millions of years while the other, in its current form, has only been around for 50. Ok. Are you saying that self-defense from all forms of oppression and tyranny isn't ingrained in your DNA? You're of a genetically-servile breed? Even Dobby the House Elf took up arms.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:22 PM
1

I would if those same Conservatives didn't resort to the over used and pathetic "libtard" and "snowflake" insults. Individuals that shortsighted don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. I don't know anyone like that. But, okay. You know shitty people. There is no mandate that gun owners be trained. And every time one is mentioned there's more bitching and whining about "muh second amendment rights" when those bitching have no idea what infringement actually means. There's no mandate that people b…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:09 PM
1

First, "Conservatives" is a shit label. Elevate yourself above oversimplified, false dichotomies. Second, how do you come by the knowledge that they didn't do research and go to the range with knowledgeable friends and/or family? I literally know zero gun owners who fit either description. at least 25% of the people at work have Indiana LTCHs. Over half own long guns. All are well educated on the ways government might put the screws to them, how to handle firearms, which sorts of uses are justif…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 07:46 PM
1

What shithead doesn't seek education and instruction? Nice fiction.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 06:39 PM
1

You missed the point again. Government size/scope/power and tax-theft is WHY Amazon is doing what Amazon is doing. Look at the base incentives. Their behavior should surprise no one. Yeah. Sucks that they're doing it. But, that's the SYMPTOM. Not the cause. If you want to fix it, stop centralizing shit. UBI is just another power centralization scheme.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:30 PM
1

Paying a willing employee a wage that they agree to can be discussed. But, it's definitely not worse than the outright theft of taxation. In fact, without government theft, Amazon's employees wouldn't be caught in the social -edistribution / crony-capitalism schemes you're referring to. $300 a month is still more than $0. You're literally proving my point that even accounting for inflation most Americans will come out on top with a UBI. ...at a cost of 70% overhead (numbers pulled from my ass). …
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:07 PM
1

Yeah. Sucks. That said, if you know how I can get a sugar-mama who isn't stealing from my neighbors, let me know.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:55 PM
2

The "working class" would be doing fine if government would pull its dick out of physician's asses and stop taxing the "working class" to death.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:10 PM
2

Because "To Bear Arms" in the 18th century meant, specifically, to bear arms in a militia or military for a country. Cool twist. Now tell me more about how the militias were sourced and how that played into the overthrow of British rule in the Colonies.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:09 PM
1

"Arms" protected in the 2A includes battleships, explosives, artillery, etc. The founders didn't differentiate. When you read historical documents, you must use the definitions of words at the time. The entire purpose is to oppose tyranny, whether foreign or domestic. Yes. My AR-10 is a peashooter compared to a tank. The fact that they've infringed upon my rights such that private tank/helicopter/fighter/bomber ownership is disallowed doesn't negate the purpose and effect of the 2nd Amendment. L…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:29 PM
1

I'm an anarcho-capitalist (better named "Voluntaryist"). I'll only accept import/export fees on the basis that the docks and international trade are protected and bolstered by federal diplomatic and military activities. Therefore, the only legitimate federal expenditures are in the realm of diplomatic and LEGITIMATE military activities, both inter-national and inter-state. All else requires perverse readings of the federal charter and leads to crony capitalism and federal lobbying. At the "state…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:24 PM
1

I'm not a huge fan of the 2D L/R paradigm. It misses too much. But, if we define "Right" as those who want to spend money on infrastructure and "Left" as those who want to spend money on people, then I'd say there is no "Right". There is only "Middle" and "Left". Social policy shit doesn't interest me. Anyone who wants to control social shit at the federal level is a controlling piece of shit, IMO.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:20 PM
2

My gun doesn't exist alone. It has approximately 400 million friends. Democide occurs only after mass disarmament. I don't trust any ruler who advocates mass disarmament. That said, "arms" protected in the 2A includes battleships, explosives, artillery, etc. The founders didn't differentiate. When you read historical documents, you must use the definitions of words at the time. The entire purpose is to oppose tyranny, whether foreign or domestic. That's much more important than my foreskin.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 03:12 PM
3

You misunderstood my point. For the bulk of Americans, you toss them $1000 per month and you're going to see: Increased rent costs Increased automotive costs Increased prices in stores Increased spending on non-essentials Increased consumption of drugs/alcohol This $1000/mo isn't going to be a $1000 net benefit to most recipients. I'd wager the real benefit of this $1000/mo is going to be less than $300/mo after things find equilibrium. The source is theft. Everything downstream is tainted by th…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:58 PM
3

Not even close.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:54 PM
0

That presumes the legitimacy of land taxes and the use of those for anything beyond the limited functions listed in the federal charter.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:54 PM
7

Know what happens after "easy come"?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:22 PM
-1

Consider state and local primary races.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:50 AM
-1

He has insane economic stance based on childlike misunderstandings of basic realities.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:49 AM
6

He doesn't have that money. You're excited to have him steal it for you.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:47 AM
12

Read about 20th century murders by governments. Guns = bodily autonomy Life > foreskin > aesthetics
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:46 AM
-1

Theft is bad, m-kay?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:44 AM
1

All huge debt creators. To be fair to you, the "Conservative" zeal for Reagan is born of their ignorance. What Reagan SAID and what Reagan DID were quite at odds with each other. But, you'd not have known it by watching, listening to, or reading 80s news coverage. It's not dissimilar to the general mainstream media cover-up for Obama, though the internet offered various platforms for alternative voices during his reign which were not available while Reagan was lying us.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:42 AM
1

I listen to econ lectures and debates while I work (drafter). So, it's clear to me that Yang is a conman trying to sell a dream. Perfect politician.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:34 AM
7

They're why I vomit-voted for Trump. A piece of shit is preferable to a corrupt piece of shit.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:31 AM
3

Nope. We can even build our own from billet metal.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:29 AM
6

Those are opposing views if you understand economics.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:28 AM
2

Spread the economic unreality?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:28 AM
5

Tossing $1000/mo at irresponsible people isn't going to lead to a utopia. For responsible people, it's just going to reduce their working wages, disincentivizing labor.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:25 AM
1

It only needs $800B in new revenue. His plan is a 10% VAT. So, theft. It only needs theft to work.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:23 AM
7

My dick, while rather potent /bravado, isn't going to stop government tyranny.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:19 AM
2

Nothing is so perverse as the remnants of a fallen empire.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:53 PM
3

The UK loves Monty Python so much they made satire reality...or is it "they made reality satire"...? So confusing.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:53 PM
3

Feminism = Infantilization
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:13 PM
332

Yes, but have you tried looking at it from the point of view of an unhinged moron?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:16 PM
2

That's just what a Freemason would say... :P
/r/MensRights13/02/19 10:52 PM
1

I really don't understand what you're trying to say. Can you rephrase?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:41 AM
201

I drove past a water main break last week in -2 degree Fahrenheit, snowy weather. Can anyone guess how many women were engaged in equality on that work site?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:39 PM
8

After watching his pants-shittingly stupid stances on firearms (as he can soon observe in Venezuela, I fear), finding that I agree with him on something made me re-evaluate my stance here.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:28 AM
1

I've not explored which "generics" are okay and which are sub-par wastes of money. It probably doesn't matter much for about 1/3rd of that list. The other 2/3rds I'd probably risk skin irritations. I'm a very allergy-prone person. For example, the only deodorant I've found which does keep me dry and odor-free and doesn't create large cysts in my armpits is the Old Spice not-antiperspirant just-deodorant.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:59 PM
2

OMG. You just became my hero :)
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:37 PM
13

My wife had just purchased a 20-pack of Gillette cartridges for $42 from Costco a week before the cursed ad was released. I'll be using those up for about the next year and a half. I won't be purchasing more and we're considering a major change to our preferred brands, moving away from P&G products entirely. For my wife and I, a P&G boycott would mean no more: Tide Pods Downy dryer sheets Downy liquid fabric softener Bounty paper towels Charmin Ultra-Strong (I'm open to good alternatives on this…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:03 PM
4

Why has the NFL been called into Congressional hearings? Simple answer: government doesn't do its proper job.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 12:16 PM
12

Because 15yo mom-seducing patriarchy! THINK OF THE... um... bsod
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:44 PM
34

Did you just assign her agency, shitlord?
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:24 PM
16

South Africa will soon be paradise.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:20 PM
2

Of course. My point is that obesity is a valuable differentiation between likely-responsible and likely-irresponsible people while height and breast size are almost entirely superficial characteristics. That's not to say one's personal preferences shouldn't be considered. Rather, I'm saying that lumping an important characteristic in with superficial traits is a bad way to make an argument.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 08:46 PM
2

As a fat guy, I'll say that you should absolutely discriminate against overweight dates. There are a host of genetic, character, and financial reasons to do so. I'd leave weight out of the height and tits argument to keep it closer to apples:apples.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:02 PM
3

This is why the word "chaperone" exists. Women are false accusing at tremendously increased rates. Protect yourselves, fellas. Accusation-rape is real and we're not allowed to teach women not to accusation-rape.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:44 PM
4

12 years. Double it. Incentive for coming clean sooner.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:50 PM
3

Pretty sure I'd build a killdozer...
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:14 AM
3

I'd guess that Serena's parents abused their daughters toward success and that her tantrum is a direct result of their parenting. Yeah...I thought I did pretty well at specifying that I wasn't presenting a fact.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:09 PM
6

My adopted son doesn't either, despite a similar early childhood. Instead, he internalizes everything.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:02 PM
14

Her tantrum reminded me of a foster daughter my wife and I cared for several years ago. She was abused and neglected during infancy and had heightened fight/flight responses. If you called her out on anything, you'd get the exact same sort of lunatic ranting from her. I'd guess that Serena's parents abused their daughters toward success and that her tantrum is a direct result of their parenting.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 04:01 PM
4

She was only 37 at the time. She didn't know any better. This 17yo predator took advantage of her... Anyone who defends her has zero credibility. I hope someone's keeping track.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:14 PM
2

When I was somewhere around age 12 (probably ~5'10"@170lbs), one of my classmates and near-neighbors (a rather "burly" girl) was at the community pool. A couple of boys had been splashing her a lot. She grabbed the long safety hook off the pump-house wall, got into the pool, and started beating them in the head with it. Everyone was trying to talk her down, but she kept doing it. I waded toward her, blocking the hook several times (bruising my arms), and struck her in the nose one time with my o…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:05 AM
1

Every time in my life that I've been hit, the hitter ended up pinned to the ground until they promised to calm TF down. Average time is probably around 3 minutes with semi-restricted airway and mostly-restricted movement. That relies heavily upon being large. I feel bad for the smaller guys who get stuck in such a situation without overwhelming force. No win scenarios abound. As others have said, we just need to teach women not to be abusive...to borrow from their idiotic phrasing.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:57 AM
1

https://i.imgur.com/xlrDyPV.gifv
/r/MensRights13/05/18 11:28 PM
2

Or do none of you know the meaning of exonerated? Probably that. Language is a fickle thing and mastery of it is rapidly declining. Are you unaware of the state of education, particularly for boys who rarely fit the mold? I figure most people heard "exonerated" on the news or a legal drama. From basic context, it's easily conflated with "got off". Expect that's the intended meaning here and move on.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:26 AM
10

Far too many women are raised to be useless, childish princesses who almost always get their way and throw tantrums when they don't. I married one 18 years ago. We fixed our marriage (mostly) about 9 years ago. That first half was hell and this story isn't a far cry.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:21 AM
1

Eggs.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:41 PM
1

Aye. Very little feeling and not enough skin for vigorous use of full erection without tearing. The butchers are just guessing how much to remove.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:57 PM
2

How else do you solve allegations of intimate aggression? Body cameras?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:33 PM
2

I'm in the 6-7 range and my plumbing works fine. But, my wife would be fine if I was much smaller because I can use my mouth and hands to stimulate her. What she does care about is that she can't make me orgasm because my idiot parents had my glans butchered at birth. At first she liked that I could go for an hour, now she hates it.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:45 PM
1

There used to be a working system; chaperones. Women wanted freedom from such "oppression", though. Here we are with claims that we need to teach me not to rape...
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:30 PM
13

It's not okay to call her sort petards anymore. She's "character challenged".
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:32 PM
2

If someone said this to my face, they'd be scrambling for their safe space.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 10:45 PM
9

I enabled for about 10 years. It's been getting steadily better since. When I commit, I commit. We're mostly happy now. But, yeah...we were quite unequally yoked when we began our codependent relationship nearly 2 decades ago. My advice to young men goes this way: It is good for a man to stay single...if he can control himself and find purpose in life. It is good for a man to get married...if he can find a smart, responsible, and generous partner with whom to share his life. If you're not on eit…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:52 PM
3

I do think that holding the gun of the courts/garnishments/cops/prisons against a man's head and turning him into an indentured slave, does inch closer toward actually justifying self defense...but only a bit. That bit might be the bit needed for someone who's already teetering at the edge. But, I was basically saying that we shouldn't be surprised if OTHERS justify violence in these situations. It doesn't make it right...but it does become more predictable. It'd be little different than being s…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:29 PM
3

If you read that as justification, your comprehension sucks.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:37 PM
31

Sadly and scarily, it's starting to border on justified self-defense when you have a clearly worded contract between two consenting adults which is nullified and then your possessions and the products of your future labor are stolen from you. I mean...I think it would be rare to find a man who wouldn't contemplate some form of "self-defense" which would be viewed by the courts as murder, in such a situation. It's bad enough when there isn't a pre-nup, but with a pre-nup in hand to still become a…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:42 PM
3

When I read the title, all I smell is burnt toast.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:59 PM
12

Get your kid out of that school setting. It'll ruin him.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:16 PM
72

I'm circumcised and too much skin was removed. Sex causes painful tears on the "neck" and I have very little pleasurable sensitivity. My wife of 17 years hates it and it will always be an issue in my marriage. Thanks Mom and Dad for having doctors mutilate me with your first decision as parents.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:26 PM
6

It's never okay to use INITIATE violence against someone UNLESS YOU CAN ARTICULATE FEAR OF CREDIBLE IMMEDIATE THREAT TO HUMAN SAFETY FTFY
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:50 PM
1

I don't generally encounter those stories on forums. But, yeah, those same questions come to mind. Does she just regret it, or did the dude hold her and force her?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:03 PM
1

I disagree. The presence of the power is enough to be an issue, whether it's wielded or not.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:19 PM
6

I kinda hope to find out that we're just here to power someone's spacecraft.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:17 PM
1

I think it's enough that one was institutionally-subordinate to the other.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:04 PM
1

Except in those parts of the world where he can consent, that is? He's 18 and she's 40 - still a 22 year difference, society/law should come down pretty hard on her! Legality and morality aren't equals to me. But, yeah, I guess I automatically ostracize gross differentiations, like your 22 year difference example. But, "ability to consent", morally speaking, is a sliding scale. I don't think 18yos should be signing up for military foreign adventurism, nor consent to a sexual relationship with so…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:01 AM
3

A big component is the abuse of the guide/pupil relationship. Teacher, therapist, doctor, parent, aunt, uncle, grandparent, law enforcement, etc. Age/maturity/cognition differences, of course, are the other major component.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:48 AM
3

No problem. It's certainly a complex topic. She's 11 years older than he is, so I think society/law should come down pretty hard on her. But, I'll bet the boy will require more therapy from the legal process and everyone's concern, than from his experiences with her...depending upon the depths of any mind games she might've played. Were she a 22yo teacher? Well...I think I'd leave it up to the kid's parents (if they're stable) to decide whether to press criminal charges, but I'd insist that her …
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:09 PM
18

I do. I think it's important that words remain concise. "Sex offender", to me, has a default definition of "peed in public" "Felon" means "caught with drugs for personal use" "Manslaughterer" means "bad driver" Our media, law enforcement, and courts have shit upon those words so much that I no longer can tell whether an "offender" is dangerous or just a normal person who did stupid shit at age 19. When I hear "rape", I consider all of those things I previously listed.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:55 PM
1

16yo can consent in many parts of the world. Only 2 years later the kid can conscript himself into the military and/or bury himself beneath enormous debts, things I deem MUCH more damaging than getting laid by his clearly-attractive teacher (if that's what happened). That's the only reason I included it. Were he an 8yo, it wouldn't have been worth mentioning. Note, I'm not pulling that whole "NIIICEEE" southpark thing. But, I remember when I was 16. She's still a piece of shit, but it's likely t…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:50 PM
30

Or just more descriptive labels: When it's said she "raped" him, did she: Have sex with his under-aged "consent"? (horrible, but not quite violent rape) "Force" sex with him via threats from her place of academic power? "Force" sex with him via legal threats (if you don't, I'll say you raped <insert classmate>)? "Force" sex with him via physical threats? Violently force him to have sex with her? When it's said that she "sodomized" him, did she: Give him a blowjob with his under-aged "consent"? P…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:57 PM
8

As long a they're tall and able to provide.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:44 AM
3

Wait...by omission, are they insinuating that abusive women are incapable of stopping abuse? How very anti-feminist of them.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:47 PM
1

Gross oversimplification. You can't turn a sprinter into a marathoner of the same ability just by changing the training. Different length races require different body types to excel. I'm well aware. I wasn't trying to be thorough in the comparison. I felt it obvious enough to most readers. And the end result would be that men dominate all sports. It's not just strength but men have better spacial reasoning and hand-eye coordination. So? Why create a special category for an lower-performing group…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:18 PM
8

It's not just like. Separating by gender is more similar to separating by skin color. It's not an important distinction. When wrestlers are separated by weight, there's a huge bit of physics behind the division. As an extreme example; pitting a 100lb wrestler against a 400lb wrestler would not only be uncompetitive, but would very likely result in serious injury or death. When runners are separated by distance, it's a matter of training and mechanics. You'd no sooner pit a sprinter against a mar…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:12 PM
2

I saw a female roofer once. Once.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:22 PM
1

Don't stoop to their level. Just because you can use government jackboots against them, doesn't mean you should.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:21 PM
2

I sell basters, so I'm rolling in cash.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:20 PM
2

You could just donate to shelters for men What? I'd have to divert my funding from the Unicorn exhibit at my local zoo...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:02 PM
-2

The funding is fungible. I don't want my wages, via theft, going to an organization which performs abortions. I also don't want jackboots with guns preventing abortions. Instead, just defund them and let people who want to support them provide voluntary funding. If they're so widely supported, the money will roll in... It just shouldn't be mine.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:48 PM
1

You bring up an interesting point. But, there ought to be equity in that comparison, no? A daily maid service costs about $20,000 per year. She's no longer providing that service to OP. OP's salary appears to be about $90k, if paid biweekly. Assuming split custody of the kids, she should AT MOST receive ($90k - $20k)/2=$35k, which is $1350 per biweekly pay period. If she has >50% custody, then additional money would be in order, based on basic childcare costs, which are about $10k per child per …
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:27 PM
1

With that, I've lost all interest in saving the Wales.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:37 AM
1

Reasonable is a sticky word. Were I on a jury and saw such a text AND a complete lack of positive evidence...I know what I'd do.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:31 PM
3

Yeah, like I said, it's not really proof of anything. It's still possible to rape someone after receiving a text like that from them and it's still possible to make a false rape accusation after sending a text like that. It simply creates a doubt.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:42 PM
11

It was implied. I caught it. In the absence of rape evidence, this text illustrates it may very well be a false accusation, though it's not actionable.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:19 PM
4

Suffering needn't require food nor shelter...
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:11 AM
3

Can we just go with: Identity politics idiots don't get to tell me what I get to decide? Stop using force-by-proxy against your fellow humans and it won't matter WTF people "decide".
/r/MensRights28/06/16 11:05 PM
6

I've been married almost 17 years. It's not wishful. It's dutiful.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:18 PM
2

Equal pay for stupid people!
/r/MensRights27/06/16 08:10 PM
47

It's some sort of gender specific "pass". I can't quite recall its official name. It's occasionally on the tip of my tongue.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 08:09 PM
3

Forrest Gump also involved him heading off to war.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 11:39 AM
8

No evidence, no crime. Human minds and words aren't trustworthy. If you wanna go drinking, go with people you trust. Or...just don't go drinking and enjoy a saner, safer life with fewer unnecessary complications.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:38 PM
5

I was that height/weight at age 10... Imagine the "dating" pool for immoral midget women...
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:37 PM
1

There are certainly outliers in all fields. Engineers who push basic paper and respond to emails. Doctors who spend all day prescribing basic antibiotics. Librarians who spend all day doing intense research. Daycare workers who are administering complex medications and performing physical therapy. But, those are the exceptions. And yeah, my job's kinda shitty. But, NE Indiana's cost of living is pretty low, so my 1600 sq ft house only cost 1.6 years of my salary. I haven't really checked into ho…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:51 AM
1

There's a vast difference in requisite knowledge and expertise at the very least. I'd imagine if you don't have an overly-cushy job, the day-to-day tasks are pretty stressful. ...or I really need to have a serious talk with my employer about my overly-stressful drafting/engineering/project-management/IT position for $50k...
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:03 AM
8

I think it's safe to say that a significant sub-portion of the 20.9% of teachers who are male are also "getting shit done". The few male teachers I had were certainly the most effective and memorable. I'd love to be a teacher myself. I've taught numerous coworkers how to operate AutoCAD and everyone is always amazed at how quickly and effectively I can teach them. I love it. But, I'm just not up for being a potential martyr and either performing or explaining why I didn't perform the expected co…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:05 AM
3

Certainly. I've told my son that if he's looking for a ministry, instead of working at a clinic in Haiti or handing out mosquito nets in the Congo, he should become a male school teacher. It's a very important job with a high likelihood of social/legal martyrdom. Strong male teachers are among the very few people who can have a huge positive impact in the lives of the young men growing up in broken households with absent or abusive fathers. My point about the differences at the top and bottom of…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:33 AM
47

It was a general statement about the lot. You do, in fact, work with people. You don't produce a product. You produce change in people. I didn't mean that everything in that list also "look[s] pretty for others". Very few librarians set about their day looking pretty. I wasn't diminishing your work. I was highlighting a major differentiation between the top and bottom of that list. But, really, working with people tends to require less mental and/or physical labor. Instead, it requires more empa…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:07 PM
79

At the top you'll find people working with people and looking pretty for other people. At the bottom you'll find people getting shit done so we have nice things like machines and running water.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:43 PM
26

Around age 12 (late '80s) I saw a guy getting hit in the head by a pool rescue pole at the local pool. The girl (also 12) swinging the pole at him was hitting everyone who got close and vomiting a constant stream of curses. I waded over and socked her in the mouth, mostly to shock/stop her, but also because I got hit several times and was pissed. Her dad thanked me later. I doubt it would work that way nowadays.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:21 PM
1

Answer: Get rid of the draft. Compelling people to fight a war against their will is a special kind of evil. If a war is just, people volunteer.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:26 PM
8

The cases where dad comes along after a year or two and disrupts the adoptive home?...debatable. This case? Are these people nucking futs? They stole his child.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 06:34 PM
16

Reward without responsibility is one of the defining features of femininity childishness. I think I FTFY? Maybe we're both right?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:19 PM
7

As evidenced by her reaction in this case.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:17 PM
1

No, it's a joke.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 12:26 PM
3

But, then the boy's school will get sued for not letting girls play on their football team.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:13 PM
42

So brave! What an inspiration!
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:10 PM
5

I think the better, and only potentially morally sound goal of alimony would be to remove the basic and immediate financial barrier to leaving an abusive partner. Any Dollar amount above this basic purpose is predatory and abusive, IMO.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:19 PM
1

I'm talking about morality, not law. The two are rarely on the same page. You said: Statutory rape. It is "actual rape". Calling anything but physically forced sexual acts "rape" diminishes the meaning of the word. What she did was immoral, but throwing her into a cage isn't going to fix anything. If the genders were reversed, I'd have the same opinion. If he'd been younger or had a mental handicap, I'd have a different opinion.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:46 PM
1

Okay, so your sense of right and wrong comes directly from law... Conversation over.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:03 AM
-2

It hardly sounds like she used force. Coercion, grooming, and manipulation will always be very gray areas...but tossing people into cages for questionable behavior is hardly a good thing. To call this rape really diminishes the seriousness of actual rape. Unless he's mentally disabled, he was capable of consent...regardless what some piece of paper somewhere asserts.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:25 AM
57

Nobody. Males can't be victims. Rite? /s
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:03 PM
2

At age 15, a teacher who looked like her could have had her way with me without protest. I'm sure it would have stunted my emotional growth and I don't advocate it. But I'm not convinced that, male or female, anyone should be tossed into a cage for it. It'd be pretty good, though, to make efforts to keep her out of classrooms.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:01 PM
1

A lot of things 15yos do can scar them. Scars don't heal when someone is tossed into a cage and it's immoral to put people into cages as a warning to others. The only reason cages should be used is to protect a community from a dangerous person. She did corrupt a young person...but that happens every day in so many ways that, again, I'm reluctant to advocate caging the adult simply because of the danger of false charges. That said, rape (F>M, M>F, M>M, F>F, molestation, etc.) is a totally differ…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:00 PM
2

Exactly. Pushing people to the fringes of society is a sure way to ruin their lives and the lives of those around them. Doing so unnecessarily is tremendously evil.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:55 PM
1

This is why we need drug legalization. Without ISO standards, we're lost!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:29 PM
38

Men have better spacial relations LIES! The only reason I've not encountered a female drafter in my 20 year career is because The Patriarchy™!
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:27 PM
48

That's his next gig. He's so good he gets hooked up early. Even had a Nobel Peace Prize for his presidency before he was sworn in.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:30 PM
3

All you have to do is find one woman whose head isn't filled with bullshit. It's a tough search, but they're out there. You usually won't find them in bars, though.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:06 PM
1

I assumed this was The Onion...
/r/MensRights20/07/15 07:19 PM
0

Just think of all their poor wives, mothers, & daughters!
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:06 PM
1

Oh, it's certainly not 100% liability, but the additional mass from being overall larger does have many drawbacks. This isn't just about a taller person...but a larger person. For me, the few times I've needed to & wasn't in a swimming pool, I've closed distance, grabbed, put them on the ground, and used submissive holds to finish. I have zero desire to hurt someone, even in the heat of the moment. So, I just want to end the confrontation as quickly & safely as possible.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:11 PM
1

Only when the fighters are of near-equal mass...and when there are strict rules about movement, weapons, and grappling. Otherwise, my 6'9" wingspan on my 6'3", 300lb frame doesn't make me some sort of MMA god. Anyone 150lbs or lighter could easily knock me out if I failed to grab & subdue them.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:10 PM
4

Hell even as a varsity wrestler in high school I'd lose to the smaller people. The speed in which they can move is incredible and being a big, lumbering, fuck like I am I can't react fast enough. 6'3" here and can confirm. Until the altercation hits the ground, height and weight are usually liabilities. Best you can do is use longer reach to grab & higher center-of-mass to topple them, then grapple & subdue them on the ground. I punched a girl in the face in my subdivision's lifeguard-less swimm…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:31 PM
18

That abstract concept is much less important than whether men with guns can come enslave you at a later date.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:34 AM
2

Not quite the same thing. She did something that's actually horrible. Just because the police figured out they were being used in this case, doesn't mean that she didn't attempt to, by proxy, kidnap, incarcerate, and enslave these men.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:25 AM
3

You're presuming that she's unwilling to harm people with more direct methods. Even if your presumption is right, there's little stopping her from finding others to do her work for her. I'm sure she's deemed attractive enough in her circles to accomplish violence-by-proxy without relying upon government agents...and she wouldn't be the first to accomplish such a thing.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:06 PM
6

To me, really, it's less about punishment and more about protecting people from her obviously sociopathic character traits while also presenting her as a figurative head-on-a-pike to deter others from similar transgressions. Punitive incarceration doesn't usually make anything better for anyone involved. While "authorities" may not "believe" any further rape claims...that doesn't stop her obviously poor character from negatively affecting the lives of everyone around her in other toxic ways. Tha…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:14 PM
19

If I hired a hitman who turned out to be an FBI agent, I'd be put away for a very long time. Maybe not quite as long as if I'd hired someone who followed though, but a long time, nonetheless. She "hired" the government to kidnap, imprison, and enslave these men for what likely could have been 10-20 years each. Her punishment should be pretty severe for such a violent and inhumane act.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:37 PM
15

That seems logical & suitable to me. It's tantamount to hiring someone to kidnap, imprison, & enslave them for the typical term of a rape sentence.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:35 PM
5

Your personal child support story has nothing to do with men being perceived & "informed", by society/media, that they're unimportant & disposable. In this particular story, it's hard to say whether he was really "deadbeat", or whether unrealistic expectations were levied upon him. You don't know whether his wife cheated on him, divorced him, then collected >50% of his income...or if he beat his wife, left her, and failed to pay <10% of his income. Those two scenarios are completely different. O…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:44 PM
146

"Oh, Homer..." We're unimportant & disposable.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:08 PM
-1

Wow...wish I would have realized sooner that you're just a childish fucking troll. Hopefully someone else can benefit from what I took the time to type.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:03 PM
0

The whole "your body is a furnace" thing is a very oversimplified, inaccurate way of looking at it. If my body is used to processing lots of carbohydrates with lots of insulin and almost immediately storing any of that energy for which my muscles aren't currently asking for, I get fat from <1500 calories per day. If I get my body used to processing lots of fats using lots of ketones, my body is able to perform a "free exchange" of energy from both what I eat and from my stores of bodyfat. http:/…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:27 PM
0

Yeah, it does matter. Insulin and ketones operate differently. Do some reading instead of trying to oversimplify something about which you're clearly ignorant.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:51 AM
4

It's based on what we've been taught & subsidized to eat. I made it up to 335 lbs before finding /r/keto Since February, I've dropped 30 lbs with no exercise. I've simply changed what I eat. Not even how much...just WHAT I eat. Instead of whole grain cereal, bread, pasta, fresh fruit, and low fat...I eat about 2600 calories of fatty meats and vegetables prepared in lard. My skin has cleared up, I feel at least twice as good as I used to, I can think more clearly, and I'm losing weight. So, go ah…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:26 AM
22

Occupied cells should never be profit centers. Yet, that's exactly what we've created in modern America. Is it any surprise that justice is too rare?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:29 PM
53

just go outside and water the bushes "Sex Offender" in 3...2...
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:31 PM
2

Instead of a triangle make it two triangles overlaid upon each other, rotated 180 degrees from one another, so as to form six points, for extra effect. And, really, we can't get any more brightly colored than yellow, eh?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:51 AM
5

That explains my inner turmoil.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:08 PM
11

I'm not "German". I have French, German, & Polish descent from my father's side. But it's plain to see, evil inside of me is on the rise. :P
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:41 PM
20

Fellow white Germanic male here. I concur, evilly.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:58 PM
2

"Hate speech" just doesn't quite call it what it is. It's overused and diluted. I prefer to think of it as evil speech with an intent to cause or perpetuate violence. And there's real violence being perpetrated due to such speech. Men being violently (implied or acted) thrown into cages because of these violent, evil, man-hating feminists.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:33 PM
3

I specifically used the word "say" because of that implied distinction. Though, I do wonder what some of these frothing feminists would do if given power...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 01:52 PM
165

At first I thought they were actual Hitler quotes...until they started getting worse than what Hitler would actually say. Some feminists are scary.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:45 AM
27

If you're going to ship your kids off to government or private schools, there's absolutely no reason for the "stay-at-home-parent" not to generate income, or otherwise make a near-equal contribution to the household, during those times in which parenting isn't performed. My buddy's wife sits on her ass all day while their kids are at school and while he works his ass off. She picks the kids up from school, takes care of them for 2 hours before he's off work, then she goes out with friends while …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:20 PM
8

Notice that I said "women's movement", as opposed to "women". There's a difference. My wife doesn't have these issues. But, a lot of really vocal women do and they create a cultural environment which encourages and accepts, or even subsidizes, otherwise level-headed women to act like children and abuse the people in their lives. It really is like an immature 17 year old kid running their household and holding their family hostage to their lies, emotions, and general irresponsibility.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 11:00 PM
12

I hate to make the comparison, but these things weren't issues when they couldn't vote and were expected to stay at home and care for the kids... EDIT: What I meant didn't come through in this previous sentence. My post below does a better job explaining what I meant. What we're seeing is that the women's movement has just turned 17 and now wants all of the freedoms of being a "real" adult, but none of the responsibilities... I can't wait for the movement to finally grow up...
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:46 PM
18

If I had a nickel for every time I heard a woman say; I can't wait to be an astrophysicist. The universe is amazi...is that a guy wearing a shirt with half-naked women on it? Fuck it, I'm gonna go be a receptionist. Seriously. I'd almost have a nickel!
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:46 AM
5

As a 6'-3", 325 lb. man with a bad memory...what were we talking about again?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:10 PM
2

How 'bout, as a deterrent, we just get rid of the state?... :P
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:29 PM
5

Misogyny Test: Did a man say it? Y = Mysogyny! N = What a hero!
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:11 PM
1

He even stuck the landing.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:53 PM
23

I rode my bike around my entire town when I was 10. I'd be gone for 6-8 hours sometimes. I didn't vandalize & I never caught the rape. The worst thing to come of it is that my legs were absolutely gargantuan by the time I was 16 and started driving. The only real differences, apart from the stupid-obvious examples you provided, between then and now are: People are more afraid of imaginary dangers now. Society expects less of children now...and children gladly meet those lowered expectations. Peo…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:41 PM
3

Will people have to carry a small stamp pad with ink and a consent card, in addition to condoms We'll call it a "Piece of Assport". You get free STD testing for every one you fill up.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:40 PM
7

Friends don't let friends have private sex. Become a designated sex witness today!
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:36 PM
9

As a mid-30s white, married, straight man; only family court and circumcision were on my radar before I stumbled across /r/MensRights. I've seen a few posts that rubbed me the wrong way, but for the most part, this sub is spot-on. The feminist movement has managed to swing the pendulum the other way and, IMO, are making it less balanced than it was before the Women's Suffrage movement. IMO, we'd all be a lot better off if everyone would stop using the government as a tool to elevate themselves a…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:20 PM
5

If we're under full-scale attack, I'd wager we'll have plenty of volunteers. The draft exists for going elsewhere and killing people...something that only the insane and/or ignorant would ever volunteer for.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:29 PM
12

Yet, I can see how that would be received as inflammatory by the sexist idiots who populate the most vocal minority of the feminist movement. I just don't think anyone should give half a shit that these assholes have become prolapsed and inflamed.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:51 PM
13

It doesn't matter as long as you don't rape anyone tomorrow. STOP RAPING!
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:58 PM
1

That's an awful lot of hostility against a group of people upon whom much blame is wrongly placed... This may be the wrong sub for this post, but holy hell, calm down and stop being so racist.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:34 PM
1

The only LAW which could possibly be logically consistent and fair is that egg-providers are 100% responsible for the children they birth, fully permitted to adopt them out or abort them w/out the sperm-provider's input UNTIL the egg-provider and sperm-provider voluntarily & contractually split that responsibility to 50%/50%. Anything else is asking for men to be tread upon by the courts.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:56 PM
16

As a mid-30s white male with an above-average income, anything I do or say will be held against me as racist and/or sexist in a court of mainstream, skewed thinking. And people wonder why I'm "standoffish"...
/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:52 PM
2

I went to church with a guy from Ohio (I'm in Indiana). Back when he was 17, he got a BJ from a 16 yo girl. 9 years later, her therapist convinced her to file charges against him. He spent 1 year in jail and is now on the registry.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:16 PM
-1

DR who btw is regarded one the greatest presidents both domestic and foreign policies He's also considered one of America's greatest traitors by many people.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:30 PM
0

The US hasn't fought a defensive war in over two centuries...
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:18 PM
10

You missed the adjective "large" in KangBroseph's post above. Afghanistan is far from being a large war.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:12 PM
0

I'd rather employ intense psychological warfare. Make members of the group think they're going insane and/or someone's out to harm them.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:20 PM
3

They're too selfish or stupid to desire the pendulum actually staying at bottom-dead-center, while far too shortsighted to understand the pendulum will continue to swing back & forth until they stop pushing it. #kickingtheshitoutofmetaphors
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:17 PM
-6

If it were my picture...I guarantee it would end in a vigilante manhunt...just reverse of how you're thinking.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:14 PM
-1

Ctrl-F -> ned -> upvote
/r/MensRights13/10/13 12:58 AM
1

Chris Rock's Op-Ed on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAmeW8bq08k
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:43 PM
5

Both are questions, so neither can be a compliment. The implication of the woman's question in frame one is that if the guy refuses to help, he's neither big, nor strong, and likely not a "real" man. The retort in frame two couldn't have exactly paralleled the sexism in frame one, as there isn't a super-human expectation of women. The closest is the mostly-extinct expectation that women are weak and subservient. However, if she refuses, she's not implicitly demeaned.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:10 PM
2

I was speaking more to those who dump the kids on their working spouse 4+ nights a week.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:53 PM
2

For that matter, a working parent's shift with the kids begins when they get home from work. In fact, some stay at home parents decide to dump the kids on the working parent when they arrive home, permitting them to go out with their friends...
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:11 PM
-1

Apparently we don't have many freedom lovers here... MRM statists... The cognitive dissonance must be deafening.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:03 AM
-2

I agree with you. IMO, nobody should ever be entitled to a job, outside of a contract which states otherwise. Forcing an employee onto an employer never creates a healthy situation. I mean...Walmart is your employee & it can't sue you when you choose to get your milk elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:59 PM
1

Not every office is a "professional" environment. In some, using first names is base & unprofessional. In others, you can all but smack each other on the ass. Considering that she refers to him as "the 50something yr old guy", I'm guessing this is a small office or even a shop environment. Emoticons in a small office or shop should be expected & not read into.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:49 PM
7

I'd sooner wager that she reminds him of his daughter or niece. Not every man who's a generation older than a woman thinks she's a fuck-puppet.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:31 AM
-1

The government creates their version of marriage & then jails you if you have sex outside their creation. How does the government-defined marriage not play into this?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:58 PM
50

Reason #375 to not let government define marriage.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:02 AM
2

I don't disagree, but I think the fact they chose an articulate, Black, charismatic Robin Hood meant that the GOP's only chance was a total departure from statism coupled with a strong campaign to educate the youth vote about TANSTAAFL.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:02 PM
3

Just don't present it as a fact & then make it the thesis of your "factual" argument.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:18 PM
4

Ron Paul could never, ever win. <-- Your Opinion Neither did McCain or Romney. I believe <sup>[opinion]</sup> Ron Paul was the only hope for the Republicans to win in '08 & '12. I didn't say that he definitely would have. Especially in '08 when charismatic Obama was promising to give away free things. His Robin-Hooding didn't have as much power in '12 because people had 3.5 years to see that it doesn't work. His being "shut out" was just an example of how things would go if he did somehow win an…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:19 PM
11

To be fair, the Republicans screwed themselves over by shutting Ron Paul out of the process. Had it been Paul -vs- Obama in November, I think we'd be on a much healthier path. TL:DR - The "young morons" didn't have a good option that could have won first-past-the-post in 2012 because the "old morons" shut him out of the primary process.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:32 PM
3

As a foster parent, I'll go ahead & say that private charities could do it a lot better.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 10:44 AM
2

How about...a customer buys goods & labor at the price they see fit...whether that customer is a corporation buying the labor of hundreds of people or is an individual buying cookies at Aldi's?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:29 PM
2

I'm not going to sit down with the character and get to know them, they are there for visual appeal, male or female. It's the same reason the Na'vi in Avatar didn't look like the Vogon from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy...
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:47 PM
1

and rolled snake crazy eyes
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:32 PM
-1

And my boss wonders why I want to carry a pistol at work...
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:44 AM
1

Sorry, I didn't realize that you were initially speaking only to the laws on the books. Personally, I don't give half a flying fuck what the laws are & look more to basic morality.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:05 AM
2

Courts don't get to define what is & isn't immoral discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:07 AM
1

You're confusing legality & morality... Also, while she may have had the same title as her peers, I doubt that she did equal work for that pay. I see such differences even among male colleagues with the same titles & their pay tends to reflect it.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 01:42 AM
6

Ms. Ledbetter worked the exact same job and made much less than even the lowest paid male peer. That's arguable discrimination and shouldn't be shoved aside simply because she's some lady. She was apparently paid enough to continue her work. Why would an employer pay more than necessary? If her employer could have found more women to do the same work for less than the men, they would have hired them as well, I'm sure. Heck, if there was any discrimination, it's likely that the decision-makers we…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:17 PM
3

as long as you don't date trash. Unfortunately, it's difficult to determine the root-trashiness of some people. With some, the trash doesn't come out until relationships end.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:18 PM
2

Does it annoy anyone else when college students post an acronym for their college, thinking it's a unique snowflake that everyone automatically identifies? To someone who doesn't go to your university, UofT could mean: University of Toronto (my guess based on the mention of Canada on the flier) University of Tallahassee University of Tennessee University of Texas University of Trenton University of Tasmania University of Tacoma University of Taipei University of Tampa University of Talladega Uni…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:59 PM
56

If he didn't want to be threatening, he should have stopped being a 6' tall male. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:23 PM
1

My guess, based upon the tone of his posts, is that he uses his (presumably) slight degree of androgyny as an excuse to become a bitch when his XX friends are on their periods.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:09 PM
2

There are girls who play high school football in the US. You're just unlikely to find a girl who is A: large/fit enough, B: interested, & C: willing to overcome social stigma.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:08 AM
1

Nah, I'm a German descendant in northern Indiana. I named my Xbox Halo avatar "Paco". I played at a buddy's house a lot. One of his buddies thought he was a badass. I stalked & demoralized him, often following behind him on a Ghost & running him over after he picked up a rocket launcher or sniper rifle. Shortly after I started putting him in his place, he kept yelling "ASSHOLE!" after each death. My buddy didn't want me to put any curses in his Xbox, so I morphed "pendejo" into something that wa…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:30 PM
5

I think it's a great example of what a human might do when being trampled by others.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:17 AM
0

Murdering someone or stripping them of all enjoyable life via out-of-control government power... Those are essentially the same thing, IMO. I certainly don't advocate either one...but humans do some nasty stuff when they perceive they've been backed into a corner.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:16 AM
-2

It's also not a situation anyone should ever be put into...but it happens daily in the US. Most men become broken. That's not my nature. Fortunately, I've been happily married for 13 years & don't believe I'll suffer such a fate.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:59 PM
14

If someone backed me into a corner like that, I'd probably do the same, but at 3am while they're home...then bee-line for Central America. It's disgusting that some women can do this w/out feeling guilt.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:26 PM
28

Cleft lips are abnormalities. Foreskins are not.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:25 PM
2

I hope he doesn't. But if that girl (now middle-aged woman) has any sort of character, she'll add as much $$$ & support on top of that $80k/yr as she can to help make amends.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:16 PM
7

He's a much bigger man than most of us. How many of us would come out of such an ordeal hell-bent on revenge? A lesser man would make a recliner from her skin. This guy is to be admired.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 06:43 PM
4

/bendsdowntogiveT-rexahug
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:55 PM
7

I was 5'7" at one point...6th grade was awesome! :P
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:02 PM
49

Being treated like everyone else in gaming means being treated like shit. If you're playing online games and no one is talking shit to you, you're the exception not a noteworthy player. FTFY
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:01 PM
1

Anyone who believes statistics derived by taking the total earnings of women & the total earnings of men, then dividing them into the population of each, without accounting for time, investment, & risk; cannot be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:03 PM
1

Those chemicals don't work well at all. Before I knew my legal rights as a citizen to assist law enforcement, I got to watch an off-duty officer chase down & attempt to subdue a shoplifter. The officer had mace with him & tried to take the large shoplifter down. Each of them got about a half-dose of mace, as the shoplifter raised his hand, splashing it back at the officer. In the end, the shoplifter's mom/girlfriend/hoe/whatever drove up & he hopped in to get away. I'm pretty sure that if he was…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:27 PM
5

Apparently these women haven't quite figured this out yet: http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/yp4eea4ba6.jpg
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:05 PM
1

As a teen, a girl at our local pool (no lifeguards) got pissed at one of my buddies, grabbed the long pole that you pull floaters out with, hopped into the pool, & started hitting my buddy & several of my friends. I tried grabbing the pole from her several times, but couldn't w/out getting brained. I ended it by bloodying her nose. Nobody said shit either because she was being so violent.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:53 PM
0

If you dislike my ignorance...how about you answer the question? I didn't exactly learn about men having periods in school. I just figured "gender neutral" was some EMO choice. If that makes me scum, so be it. But at least I'm now being inquisitive. Here's your chance.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:47 PM
0

So...your testicles cramp & you retain water? I'm sorry, but I always thought the "period" part of a period was the actual sloughing of uterine lining along with copious amounts of blood in the process. If you don't have a uterus, how can you have a period? Regardless, if you're XY, what exactly precludes you from using the XY restroom?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:02 PM
-1

Perhaps I'm just fucking ignorant...but isn't bitching about the results of your choice to forgo gender sorta like bitching about a car dealership not hiring you because you chose to have a vagina tattooed on your face? I mean sure, you might really be genderless on the inside. You might also be a giant vagina-face-tattoo on the inside. Either way, you've made the choice to live a hard life. Generally speaking, nobody chooses their chromosomes. Being legally discriminated against for either pair…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:51 PM
9

As far as I know, assault is illegal, regardless of policy, outside the TSA. The plaintiff can simply say "X assaulted my son w/out consent". That can be said regardless of the school's policy.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:48 PM
19

Who gives a shit if it's against policy. Policy is neither law nor morals. Fuck policy. It's assault unless the parents have consented.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:29 PM
1

Exactly. If they want to know difficult, they can try adopting a 13 year old boy & fostering 10 & 14 year old girls...while working as a project manager, leading a men's group @ church, becoming politically-active, & being the household's sole-earner. Our society's fake-hero worship sickens me. "You had sex, birthed a child, & haven't eaten it yet. OMG you're the best!" ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:29 PM
1

My brain can only process such lunacy into sheer rage & a near-audible alarm which constantly repeats "HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE THESE PEOPLE!?!".
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:25 PM
2

Surely at least one of your twins must have a Y chromosome & is, as we speak, repressing you. We must end the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:11 PM
19

The problem, though, is that it's often difficult to identify a future pattern the first time it presents itself.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:56 AM
-4

Personally, I fail to see the difference between circumcision, ear piercing, or face tattoos...perhaps excepting that ear piercings can close & do not have a negative effect upon one's life.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:17 PM
4

I'm actually a Vagina Archaeologist. I've written several papers on the subject. For example, your mom's a whore.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 06:32 PM
5

Traditionally speaking, she'd have been raped regularly since the age of 13 unless she was "high-born". I don't think we want tradition...
/r/MensRights09/12/11 01:29 PM
2

Because she was obviously immature enough to make a false rape allegation?...
/r/MensRights08/12/11 03:29 PM
1

I can't say the same at all, though there's not much resume discrimination in NE Indiana, yet, unless their names are "overly"-cultural (DeMarcus, Guadalupe, Dehstinie, Temptashion, etc.), which really won't negatively affect me (David). Gender & sexual-orientation discrimination still heavily goes my way in this part of the country. All I can do is influence those within my sphere. I'll be doing so tomorrow at the Men's Breakfast I organize. I started it because I see too many men letting their…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:48 PM
2

The media displays homosexual men as overly-flamboyant, overly-emotional, & a caricature which makes many people very uncomfortable. This leads to a presumption that applicants who are openly-gay might behave this way...so it's a good way to get your resume pulled out of the stack of dozens/hundreds. I didn't say it's right, but DeShawn's resume gets pulled out just based on his/her name because of similar presumptions. If I were hiring, I'd probably use those same criteria myself because of the…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:17 PM
1

In my region, NE Indiana, it would be stupid to hire an openly-gay person over a straight person of equal qualification. It's not because they put dicks in their mouths...but because there's a presumption that they might ACT "gay" on the job. I mean speak with a "gay" lithp, dress differently than their peers, & generally make the average NE Hoosier coworker/customer uncomfortable because of their presumed flamboyant behavior. It's a similar situation as hiring Mark Oberman instead of DeShawn Ja…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:55 PM
-1

What I do wonder though, is what the numbers would have been for lesbians. Popular wisdom says that gay men are generally thought of more negatively than their female counterparts. Do you mean internet/party-lesbians or real lesbians that look like fat men with spiked hair?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:53 PM
1

I've seen firsthand that kids of normal ability can learn all they need in 2-3 hours of in-home "classroom" & a few hours per day spent upon household chores & challenging hobbies. If that sounds too taxing as a parent... Now...if you raise your children from 0-5 with an electronic babysitter, then expect them to suddenly have a thirst for learning, you're a damned fool & will need to spend 6 hours/day yelling back & forth for a few years. Homeschooling parents don't need any more knowledge than…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:39 PM
4

Don't have time to take care of my kids, better drug 'em so the government school drones will tolerate their behavior! I hate our fucking society.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:37 PM
1

If they used a breathalyzer & the fermentation was happening in his stomach...he could have registered 0.30% while his BAC may have been 0.005%.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:40 PM
1

After 24 hours of sustained wakefulness (8:00) cognitive psychomotor performance decreased to a level equivalent to the performance deficit observed at a blood alcohol concentration of roughly 0.10%. Making laws against each individual method of dangerous driving makes us less free as a society & not really any safer. The latest fad is anti-texting laws... Shit's pissing me off because now I have to get an encrypted phone to protect my 4th Amendment rights because such laws give them potential p…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:39 PM
1

0.08% in my state...0.02% if under 21 years of age.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:25 PM
1

My unspoken point was that you don't see roadblocks put up outside pharmacies during allergy season to check for impaired driving...but some states will label you a felon for having bad luck & using mouthwash right before you drive somewhere...
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:16 PM
2

The allergies themselves impair you more than 0.08% BAC though...whether you pop an Allegra or not. 0.08% is a ridiculously low bar to have set.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 02:55 PM
1

If he was pulled over for another reason & was fermenting the berries in his stomach, they could have smelled alcohol on his breath...prompting them to test.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:17 PM
4

Do you really think he was genuinely impaired from a fucking blueberry muffin? This 0.08% BAC shit has got to stop. You're more impaired than that if you're tired or suffering allergy symptoms...but they don't exactly pull people over who are leaving CVS or Walgreens with Ambien or Allegra, do they?
/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:16 PM
1

"are the tenants of what makes us males masculine" "are the tenants" "the tenants" tenant - Noun - a person or group that rents and occupies land, a house, an office, or the like, from another for a period of time; lessee. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:30 PM
3

real men wear pink shirts. Not where I live...
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:33 PM
6

The 1950s wants its PDF back... Most of those aren't privileges...they're mostly-unspoken societal presumptions. There's a slew of those going both directions. I do not have to worry about the message my wardrobe sends about my sexual availability or my gender conformity. That one made me LOL. You are aware I'd get my ass kicked for wearing a pink shirt...right? The rest of them are "privileges" which us lower-middle class working grunts don't get to enjoy. I don't feel like taking the time to d…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:06 PM
2

Sadly, the children themselves are the hobbies. IMO, a good rule of thumb is; "If your hobby is or relies upon another person, you need to reevaluate how you're living."
/r/MensRights07/06/11 01:25 PM
0

When my wife & I moved, it took us almost a full year to find a church nearby which didn't practice Wife & Child Worship®... Our churches & our society are becoming truly disgusting.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:45 AM
6

what Christians say of May 21st I think you mean "a few misguided Christians with colorful vans"...
/r/MensRights16/05/11 12:30 PM
2

Considering that most marriages don't have much of a foundation, that number doesn't surprise me. There's "marriage" the state contract & then there's "marriage" the religious pact. My wife & I have been through quite a bit & have been married for eleven years.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 05:41 PM
6

My career is stale as fuck...hell, I'm not even in the field I trained for. My wife is getting a degree in hospitality administration & starting a balloon decoration business. We're also adopting a sibling group. You can bet that as soon as my wife's business takes off, I'm going to be a stay-at-home dad, homeschool, and help my wife by doing drawings while freelance fixing people's computers. That is much more "manly" than slaving away for a prick of a boss in an abusive/hostile workplace.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 04:31 PM
2

The harm is immeasurable & the benefits only exist for people who walk about fucking everything they can while collecting dick-cheese. Considering that children don't become sexually active until the age of consent (generally speaking), I think it would be prudent to let them make an informed decision at that point, and simply teach them to wash inside their dickskin at the same time we teach them to wash behind their ears.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:19 PM
2

Smegma, a cheese-like, foul-smelling substance found under the foreskin of the penis may increase the risk of penis cancer. Uncircumcised men who do not keep the area under the foreskin clean and men with a history of genital warts or human papillomavirus (HPV) are at higher risk for this rare disorder. [sic] Circumcision may decrease the risk. Men who are not circumcised should be taught at an early age the importance of cleaning beneath the foreskin as part of their personal hygiene. Good pers…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 04:03 PM
2

All extremely rare conditions which are easily diagnosed & treated. I do not see where ritual amputation is warranted by any of them. Breast cancer, a much greater concern, could be prevented by ritual amputation of breast tissue...yet I don't see anyone proposing it.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:41 PM
1

There is absolutely no proven, legitimate medical benefit to circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:58 PM
1

So you'd be fine with parents tatooing crucifixes and/or satanic symbols upon their infants? It would be pretty tough to find "proof of actual, quantifiable, harm" from some sub-dermal ink.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 01:25 PM
5

We don't need to prove that there's a problem with the maimings...those who wish to maim need to be doing the proving that there are no problems...which they have not & cannot.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:59 AM
-3

As medical student Franc Garcia has discussed, male circumcision destroys a male's capacity for certain sexual sensations and dulls other sensations. Doctors and medical students have documented the "triple whammy" of lost sexual sensitivity resulting from circumcision. 1. Loss of the foreskin nerves. The inner foreskin possesses a greater density of nerve endings and is probably more erogenous than even the glans. This tremendous amount of sensitivity is lost completely when the foreskin is amp…
/r/MensRights23/02/11 10:18 PM
7

Do you want the rate or the magnitude? Some would claim that the rate of irreparable harm from circumcision is 100%. That harm being decreased sexual enjoyment at the very least. While this falls far shy of being a devastating harm... it is still a disfigurement against a human's consent. Vaccinations, on the other hand, very rarely have side effects.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 10:02 PM
7

Why would I avoid vaccinations? They rarely cause irreparable harm to one's body. On the other hand, forcing a very young child's feet into shoes is just Foot-Binding Lite™.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:04 PM
32

I view circumcision just like I view foot-binding...it's a human rights violation which disfigures a human being before the age of consent. If a consenting person chooses to have it done...so be it. If I ever have a kid, it won't even wear shoes until it begins walking outside. Natural development is best IMO.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 02:56 PM
1

Toward the OP's question, I was trying to show what most people (I'm not in a coastal city) subconsciously associate with "being a man" & "being a woman"...even so far as including the stereotypes in books, television, & movies. I've already explained that I'd prefer to label them as "useful" & "unuseful" people. There are plenty of preening, overly-emotional, men who have no real skillsets & there are plenty of women who are more than capable of handling tasks which they set forth to perform, a…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:06 AM
1

Apparently you ran out of Comprehension Juice before you got to the following paragraph. Please check all fluid levels before reading it again, paying particular attention to the really dark (bold) words. Now...I understand the inherent gender-bias in these labels. I would love to simply replace them with labels such as "Useful/Unuseful" or "Responsible/Irresponsible"...but the gender-bias is still pervasive enough that "Girly/Manly" is more descriptive for most people. I've met many females who…
/r/MensRights17/02/11 09:27 PM
0

krangksh just doesn't understand that we box people in because they're box-able... The majority of people you meet fit neatly into one of the various boxes we each use to categorize the people in our lives. I don't force people into their boxes as if they were round-pegs into square-holes. "Girly" Person (IMO): One who tends toward obsessive & excessive preening, does not have the care and/or capacity to research & learn a subject when required (proper cooking of a steak, fixing a car, installin…
/r/MensRights17/02/11 04:09 PM
2

The nursery at my church has a rule against male nursery volunteers being alone with children or changing diapers. I've raised the point to the church elders. My point is that it reinforces negative stereotyping...something I truly believe our church shouldn't be doing.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 01:07 PM
9

Who wants to be the one to break it to her that he finds video games more interesting than her bitchy, preening self? Personally, I nominate myself...anyone second the motion & have her contact info?
/r/MensRights24/01/11 11:52 PM
1

When damage is caused to another person or their property, whether by incompetence or by malice, the end result is the same. I understand that this is not a popularly held belief. I feel that "punishments" should be payments of restitution, not time spent behind bars. This is much more productive & teaches a better lesson. If your child breaks a neighbor's window, do you think it would be better to make your child fix the window or make him sit in his room for a week? I do, however, believe that…
/r/MensRights23/12/10 03:29 PM
1

IMO, mens rea is a failed concept predicated upon the belief that thoughts matter more than actions. IMO, a person is always 100% responsible for their actions. That said, I believe justice should only be sought against a person's actions & not their supposed thoughts. As far as I'm concerned, "thoughts" shouldn't be admissible in court.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 04:21 AM
1

I wasn't speaking of ill-created laws. I was speaking of what is just & right. If someone chooses to put themselves into an intoxicated state, I personally hold them 100% accountable for all decisions & actions they perform in said state. I don't particularly care what a bunch of lawyers have concocted because it is often 180° from justice.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 04:17 AM
2

In the German legal system, Jews were exterminated. your turn. Dark kidding aside... Might (law) does not make right (moral).
/r/MensRights22/12/10 07:41 PM
16

False Claim: Consent -> Sex -> Remorse = Rape True Claim: Force -> Sex = Rape That's the elephant. I really don't care if the consent was born from being "fucked up". If you choose to lose control, it doesn't nullify your ability to consent. If I get drunk & buy a car...is that purchase nullified because I was drunk? If you drive through a farmer's market, killing 12 people, are you not guilty because you were drunk? One consequence of getting drunk/hi/whatever is that you have to live with what…
/r/MensRights22/12/10 02:27 PM
7

How? If the mother is responsible, the kid will never notice it. If she's irresponsible, no amount of money will insulate the kid from her screwups.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 03:01 PM
5

I fail to see how a mother caring for her child can "end up hurting the kid in the end". This is somehow made better by enslaving the father via the courts in order to buy the mother a new Escalade? Possible outcomes of ordinaryrendition's 6 points: 1: Woman & Man both want child. Child is born & cared for by both, whether they're together or share costs/responsibilities/custody. 2: Woman wants child, man doesn't. Child is born & cared for by woman. 3: Woman doesn't want child, man does. Woman d…
/r/MensRights16/12/10 02:12 PM
5

Oh, we used to have those rights...then 2,976 people died in a long-provoked attack, perpetrated by 19 people (8 couldn't get into the country). Since that attack, the emotional pieces of shit among us (and they are many) have been bleating like sheep, shoving their heads up their asses, and begging for the burgeoning nanny state to please please please keep them safe, to the extreme detriment of our liberties & economy. On the other hand, some of us have instead embraced the ideals of liberty, …
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:10 PM
0

You just lost The Game.
/r/MensRights10/11/10 08:01 PM
-9

LET'S ALL THROW MONEY AWAY TRYING TO STOP RANDOM CELLULAR GENETIC MUTATION!!!
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter