TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PaisleyBowtie Archive

View 0 posts and 194 comments by PaisleyBowtie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Because men getting falsely accused only matters when women like their wives become affected!
/r/MensRights26/02/17 08:24 PM
1

He had gendered robots, but yeah he's a bad example.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 05:31 PM
1

Hell, pretty much all of Asimov's domestic robots are portrayed as women, a continuation of female gender roles, which have them better acceptance than androgynous and masculine robots, and that's the 40's and 50's, I remember an author from the 80's specially mentioning humanizing robots by making them feminine though, maybe Ursula le Quinn
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:42 PM
5

I want women in the draft, because when women start coming home in caskets war casualties will actually mean something. Just like any other issue affecting men, once it starts hurting women people will care
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:03 PM
5

For one it's bull shot that this is a recent trend, sci-fi authors knew this was the case since at least the 80's, that women are wonderful extends to robots.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 01:54 PM
1

I guess the mens rights aspect it's that this young man wants to compete against men, but the state of Texas won't let him, giving him an unfair advantage?
/r/MensRights26/02/17 01:51 PM
2

Same in the US, it's just mostly done in hospitals, there's a small number of deaths every year from traditional Jewish circumcision for instance, often from herpes infections from the fellatio
/r/MensRights21/02/17 03:00 AM
7

They have internalized misogyny; any negative aspects of their gender roles is societies fault, remember only men have agency over there behavior.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:13 PM
2

The proper term for mansplaining isn't condescension, but patronizing/patronization! Its already gendered and everything!
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:11 PM
10

This is hardly just opposing feminism, he specifically wanted to give companies the ability to pay women less for equal work, which is against MRA theory too. While there's an argument to be made that the influx of women into the workforce during and after WWII did drive down wages for everyone, women being paid equally isn't the issue, more (wo)man-hours in the workforce without a concurrent ramping in demand is. The solution is shorter work weeks for everyone, not enforcing brutal gender roles…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 07:06 PM
1

Same reason the 2 to 8% figures are too low just reversed, it's built on the assumption that all the cases which aren't proven either true or false are false.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 09:26 PM
8

88% is way to high, even with the desire to prosecute every case they can, cases with no evidence either way are going to be significant.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 11:43 PM
10

And African Americans are deadlier than husbands, what's there point.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:03 AM
7

Yup
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:23 AM
1

Taking one for the team (society/family)
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:11 PM
2

Meh the students where over the age of consent, the teacher being fired and bared from teaching is really all the justice needed
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:15 AM
1

Where in the linked BLS does it state the average work week by sex or other statistics pertaining to earnings gap? I see labor participation rates, but nothing about hours worked.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:14 AM
1

To be fair, mens suicides rates are currently the same as they where in the 70's, while women's have fallen. It's reasonable to conjecture that the removal of mens only spaces contributed to men's rates but declining like women's did, but I'd hardly call it conclusive
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:09 PM
49

What's the point in having a sword if you don't get it bloody? They should mention that STIs spread much easier, and I agree attacking men who don't want to bathe in blood like a highland barbarian is pretty tacky and pretty strongly goes against consent.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:34 PM
3

Gardasil (HPV vaccine) is both cheaper than circumcision and actually effective
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:59 PM
3

Free speech is more than a Faustian choice of whether the government or corporations set the limits of discourse.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:36 PM
1

Don't ever marry someone who doesn't name at least as much as you*
/r/MensRights03/02/17 03:50 PM
4

Or made to penetrate rape
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:33 AM
2

I'd love to see a leftist group called Men's Lefts
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:35 AM
7

Yea what hits the front page from here is mostly snarky, easily digestible anti-feminist memes, and not very representative of the sub as a whole
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:23 AM
1

Okay Peter Singer
/r/MensRights01/02/17 02:45 PM
11

I personally think uncut dick looks better while erect, and that's what really matters. Flaccid, I guess cut looks better.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:03 PM
10

Instead, they've tried to ban it, although backlash has kept it going
/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:53 AM
2

Technically, men are as well as it's gender neutral, buuuutttt don't count on that. The one case I know of the mother got the child back, and he was stuck with child support and no visitation rights
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:50 PM
5

These stats are perfectly fine, just uselessly broad. I wouldn't be surprised if 1/4 - 1/2 women are lightly groped atlest once in their life, god knows I have by the straight women who hang around gay bars. Yea, minor sexual assaults happen all the time, women are just so used to their sexuality and purity being overvalued and protected that any small slight seems like a major crime in the eyes of the public.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:43 PM
8

Ahhh yes there would, as men should have agency over their reproduction.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:21 AM
27

Keep in mind India has rape by deception laws, eg having sex after saying you'll mary them and then, gasp, not ending up marrying them, is rape in India, and their social mores are noticably different than the West's as well, so it's not particularly relevant to false accusation in the West.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:55 PM
6

To be honest, non white men haven't done any better, the gender disparity between say African American college completion is worse than Caucasian, for example.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:11 AM
2

I thought you had at one point on femradebate.You advocate for gynocentrism at the very least.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:15 PM
4

Indeed
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:34 PM
6

Mistix is self proclaimed female supremesist and compemsory (crazy) feminist, of hardly use get to represent feminism in general.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:05 PM
23

I get the logic of why the child should still get child support, but why should the woman even have custody in these cases! Seems like conceiving your child through rape of a minor would be a pretty good cause for not letting them near minors in general.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:03 PM
6

Cdc's statistics, scroll way down, buried under made to penetrate id the fact that men are currently (yearly prevelence) raped roughly (slightly more, but withing error) as women. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm This is consistent with any other research that bothers to care about male victims, of which their are several I can link.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 01:56 PM
3

And get screwed out of paternity leave, and work 4-8 hours more per full time week, and are pressured into taking fewer sick and vacation days
/r/MensRights16/01/17 01:54 AM
13

Try 7%, 6.7% of the prison population is female on a federal level, atleaat.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 12:08 AM
3

Most, infact. Only reason the Republican party clings to it is there's a large demographic of single issue largely female voters who will go out and vote entirely over this issue, while there is basically no women who'd swap to voting Republican if both the Democratic and Republican candidate where pro choice. Theres very few men who care about abortion enough for it to have a significant impact on their vote, however.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:34 PM
3

He wasn't filmed, bystanders interviened
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:59 PM
1

I didn't watch it, I don't really watch YouTube in general.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:22 PM
6

Skyrim was pretty much completely gender neutral too, both the female and male guards took them arrows to the knees.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 03:03 PM
4

Mexicans? I've seen a fair number of female Latinos working crop picking and the like.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:44 PM
1

Honestly, twoX is pretty decent to this day, I could see this passing. /Feminism is pretty terrible though.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 02:08 AM
10

"Women who are highly-qualified will choose to take less demanding jobs - more nine to five, and less nine to nine-type jobs - when they have a family, because they actually feel there are better things in life than spending all their time at the office," Bullshit, no one wants to spend more time at work, but men are under much greater pressure to make personal sacrifices to provide for their family.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:01 PM
2

Prof. Sonja Starr found a 12% racial gap for black men and women, and a 63% gender gap with the same methodology. I've seen the former mentioned several times by the main stream media.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:20 PM
3

Wow, so you'd just need to accuse your ex of rape to get full custody? Breakups/divorce hearings are infamous for fabrications of abuse and the like, how could any law maker think this is a good idea, let alone a constitutional one.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:38 PM
3

The Harris and Grace study showed a "no crime" rate of about 25%, eg cases where the accuser didn't lie with malicious intent, but no rape was committed. There's also the infamous Kanin study, I believe from 1985, reported a bit over a 40% false accusation rate, and I'm pretty satisfied with it's methodology, but a small Midwestern town with strong racial tensions and poor access to birth control and abortion in the mid to late 70's isn't particularly relevant to America overall today.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:33 PM
2

But how wet is water really matters. Yes, it's certainly a fact that when receive more sympathy, but the degree really matters. I'd love to see it quantified.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 10:07 PM
1

They're already using a preponderance of evidence standard, eg conviction over anything over a <50% chance the crime was committed, which assuming the courts have no bias means the NYT thinks he-said she-said cases resulting in conviction roughly half the time, false accustom of not, isn't high enough.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:11 PM
5

Huh. Usually rape kits aren't tested because testing them only matters if sex itself is contested, rather than consent. DNA evidence is useless if the accused claims that it was consensual, as there'd be DNA regardless.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:15 PM
5

Look at the recent post on the main page about mod overlap between stubs, /mensrights is closer related to /dragons than the red pill.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:37 PM
1

I've heard demmy called all sorts of contradictory things, but regardless he's an athouritarian asshole.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:35 PM
1

There's simply less men going to college
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:29 PM
1

There's a difference between an authoritarian and an MRA, I've seen MRA thrown at him as an insult, but never him supporting common MRA taking points.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:15 PM
1

MRA is thrown around as an insult more than used legitimately
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:11 PM
1

She shouldn't be named till she's convicted of falsifying the rape claim, just like an accused rapist should be. In this case I honestly don't think it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but that he raped her certainly can't be. IMO in this he - said she said we where so drunk we can't even remember case, no one should be named or punished. He should absolutely be suing the school for kicking him out without even clear and convincing evidence.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:05 PM
2

It's pretty much entirely due to feminist Mary Koss, she's been the academic testifying before Congress, writing portions of the VAWA, etc that what she calls "unwanted contact" (female on male rape) doesn't hurt men, while also designing the studies that she's basing this off of in a way to minimize them and maximize female victimhood. The whole statistical naritive around rape has been designed by her since the 80's starting with her first sexual victimization survey, which of course doesn't c…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 11:50 PM
5

The conviction rate for rape is among the highest among crimes, around 70%, although murder tops it. If they're are issues of under prosecution of rape, it's happening well before the jurors convict.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 11:42 PM
4

Rape didn't include men on a federal level in the US till three years ago, not thirty years ago (2013), and guess what, thanks to feminist Mary Koss it still only includes men raped by men, made-to-penetrate is considered a subset of sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 11:05 PM
2

For sure
/r/MensRights26/12/16 10:55 PM
1

For such a small difference between the results of male and female doctors in the study, and the results centered around 11%, a linear regression should be pretty damn close to a log one, and is much easier to interpret.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 01:46 PM
6

Trying polling someone if they've died in the last month, and come back to me.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 10:15 PM
10

Yea it's pretty well know. Factoring leaving the field, a British study found it takes about 5 female MD graduates to match 2 male MD graduates.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 07:45 PM
3

For one, this isn't a poll, is based on AAP data, the error was small and the data set large. They had statistically significant results.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 07:08 PM
10

It's illegal where I live
/r/MensRights25/12/16 05:38 PM
16

It only looked at one type of doctor, so yes it did take that into account. They even tried to account for differences in patients, eg female doctors saw more female patients, seen between the two, but of course their data set couldn't include everything. Most importantly, male doctors saw 190 patients to females 130, and they didn't take that into account.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:56 PM
12

No, your not allowed to surgically alter animals for cosmetic reasons, but circumcision is a-okay for boys.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:35 PM
6

I have a hair on the bottom three inches or so of my dick, because as it grew it had to use scrotum skin because their was no foreskin skin to grow into.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:31 PM
50

They showed less than a one percent absolute difference, the relative difference was like 3-5% IIRC, and was statisically significant, and even a 1% difference would have been statistically significant with their sample size. That being said, female and male doctors weren't seeing the same patients, which they made a reasonable attempt to account for, but it's impossible to correct for everything, and everything they did correct for lowered the gap. Also, male doctors saw 190 patients to female …
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:28 PM
2

Yes to 1, 2 is complicated, they tried but it doesn't look like they were able to completely take it into effect, the confidence level is significant, but barely.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 07:27 PM
1

They did account for sex ratio, yes, although it's still more or less guesswork.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 04:27 PM
5

They corrected for many things, but obviously not everything.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:58 PM
7

While they did adjust for many confounding variables in the study, every single one lowered the difference, and there's little reason to think that more variables couldn't be found that would continue this trend till the gap diassapears . Also, female doctors saw 130 to male doctors 190 patients, just spending more time per patient could explain the gap.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:43 PM
41

While they did adjust for many confounding variables in the study, every single one lowered the difference, and there's little reason to think that more variables couldn't be found that would continue this trend till the gap diassapears . Also, female doctors saw 130 to male doctors 190 patients, just spending more time per patient could explain the gap.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:43 PM
3

While they did adjust for many confounding variables in the study, every single one lowered the difference, and there's little reason to think that more variables couldn't be found that would continue this trend till the gap diassapears . Also, female doctors saw 130 to male doctors 190 patients, just spending more time per patient could explain the gap.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:42 PM
4

The also found female doctors saw 2/3 the patients of males, even after factoring out their greater tendency to work part time or leave the field, so its more like "How to cause massive doctor shortages? Replace male doctors with female ones!"
/r/MensRights21/12/16 10:21 AM
2

Indeed. Unless the judge or jury said something to that effect, it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:11 PM
4

A lot of people follow gallowboob, and that made it high enough that non-regulars would see it
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:17 PM
2

None of these issues are gendered enough statistically for for me to consider a gendered approach in the first place. Serious injury from DV is roughly 2:1 female to male, while so is child abuse by biological parents. Neither one should really be approached from a gendered perspective.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:14 PM
3

Ahh Thanks, I was editing before posting and dropped that accidentally, should be fixed
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:03 PM
4

Yes, baby and child abuse is mostly committed by mothers, in part because they spend more time with them. Biological dad's are much less likely to abuse or kill their children than biological moms, but stepdads are fairly high risk.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:59 PM
11

Mary Koss just wanted female on male rape called "unwanted contact," she got it called "made-to-penetrate" instead.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:36 PM
738

Gallowboob here?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:40 PM
1

Guess Hitler did have toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 04:13 AM
9

Isn't one direction a band though, not a single performer?
/r/MensRights10/12/16 11:53 PM
286

"They must walk to school through gang battles. They have lost boyfriends and brothers to gunfire. They've seen countless shootings." Just more "women are the primary victims of war" bullshit, remember people, men getting killed only matters to the extent it affects women. I mean, someone needs to provide for them! And pay those taxes for all the programs that disproportionately help them! Male lives only matter as a means to an end, look at any government report about male suicide/depression; t…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 04:55 PM
1

Tumblr feminism is generally considered 4th wave, when 4th wave is admitted.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:36 PM
3

http://www.c2cjournal.ca/2016/12/were-teaching-university-students-lies-an-interview-with-dr-jordan-peterson/
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:24 PM
4

Involuntary manslaughter? As in accidental but criminally negligent homicide? I could easily see this falling under voluntary manslaughter, IE crime of passion considering they where supposedly arguing at the time, but they seriously ruled she had no intent to cause him serious harm when stabbing him repeatably. Hypoagency to the max.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:03 PM
3

It's become the narrative because it fits into the Duluth model, which is a huge justification for the validity of patriarchy theory
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:32 PM
7

Why are you making gay an abbreviation?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:29 PM
1

I think that has more to do with living through 100 years of history than surviving to 100
/r/MensRights09/12/16 04:07 PM
1

Very good read
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:27 AM
1

And it doesn't address the difference between cases where men seek primary custody vs when men seek it. If fathers and their lawyers believe there to be strong bias against men in family courts, there only going to pursue cases that theirs very clear evidence it's in the best interest of the children, while women and their lawyers would be much more willing to try for sole custody, even without justification, if they believe the bias is strongly in their favor. I compare this to rape if I'm argu…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 12:06 AM
3

Calorie restriction, not necessarily starvation/fasting, extends lifespan considerably, in all animals I know about.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 11:53 PM
15

Uhh, yea? Middle and upper class women have a ton of political power in western democracies, to the point Hillary's entire campaign was about appealing to them, albeit she lost.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:49 AM
1

At least 2x knows the wage gap is a myth.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:25 PM
11

Fuck, I've been there as a bisexual guy, and it didn't really change my life any. Honestly, getting tons of dick picks, agressive pickup lines, and the like on dating websites helped me understand them more, as I realized their complaints come from a phobia of male sexuality, and a strange belief in purity, like a crass asshole somehow taints you, how dare they have the audacity to message you! Seriously, even a dick pic isn't going to sexually assault you.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:46 AM
3

This is one of my larger issues with feminism, and it's particularly relevant in modern trends. I don't universally condemns feminism/feminist, but it's such a fractured movement/ideology that you can fit so many contradictory beliefs into its hard to say you could rationally disagree with the entirety of it.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:41 AM
4

My point wasnt that gender roles are bad, but that those calling masculinity bad believe it to be.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:20 AM
6

Quite frankly, I think it's just a result of the hypoagency/hyperagency dichotomy society holds between women/men respectfully. More or less, if gender roles are bad, clearly masculinity is bad, because masculinity it what causes things, while femininity is purely reactive, so it's eaither neutral (as morals don't apply to things without agency) or good as a reactive inverse to masculinity, which we established is bad.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:08 AM
1

Im pretty sure married women make less than single women, but married men do make more than single men, feel free to correct me if you have a source.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:52 PM
1

The National Science Institute says that more than half the people in science are women as of 2013. The thing is, they include things like psychology and medicine, rather than exclusively pointing at the fields women don't seem to want to go or stay into, like most engineering fields and mathematics.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:24 PM
1

That moderator is well known for banning people for shitty reasons, large part of the reason I'm here.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:58 PM
7

Single childless men haven't made more than their female counterparts since the 1980s, a few years after women surpassed men in college graduation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 01:59 PM
8

The media doesn't care about black men unless there's a hate crime angle to push; this was an accident.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:23 PM
1

Men's lib was an offshoot of second wave feminism in the 70's, before patriarchy theory was widely excepted. It strove to liberate men from their gender roles, atleast in theory, under thoughts along the lines of Gloria Steinem's "Women will never be equal outside of the home until men are equal inside it." Whether or not that's relevant to the barely existent men's lib movement today or the sub in specific is another matter of debate.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:56 AM
3

Men's lib looks at men's issues through a feminist, often gynocentric lens, while men's right does not. Men's rights isn't strictly antifeminists, but it frequently is. Personally, I follow both, but most people on each reject/ridicule the other.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:01 AM
9

Nah man, masculinity is so toxic it kills cancer!
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:07 AM
6

And Aboriginal women experienced 45 times the domestic violence of white women.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:46 PM
4

Why are men expected to get both themselves and their partner off? I've seen so many clit memes targeted at men, as if men are the ones who usually have free hands and easy access in most sexual positions.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 08:31 PM
5

Made-to-penetrate, gotta love it.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 03:36 PM
1

Firstly, how is this a men's rights issue? Are we celebrating someone caring for and helping these men fit in men? Secondly, this kind of outreach is what these migrants need to integrate successfully into society; most of the sexual harassment coming from migrants is because of their lack of understanding of cultural norms.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 03:29 PM
5

Is it run by a woman or a man? Quick, I need to know if it's mansplaing or just regular old patronization.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:46 PM
1

We said the same thing, my point is that white people on average are doing better than black people, but individuals face their own circumstances, regardless of the overall state of a demographic they belong to.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:42 PM
0

White privilege exists on the aggregate of all white people, eg, the average white person is more privileged (in terms of class, for example) than the average black person, but individuals are not averages.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 05:41 PM
3

We don't even know if she's hiding it on her profile. And it's Tinder, if she wants to be banged while 6 month pregnant, in sure she can find someone who wants to bang someone 6th month's pregnant. No way at all relates to men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:11 PM
1

Because you always know who the mother is. It's quite simple, really.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:08 PM
13

“As socialists, we are opponents of the Jews, because we see in the Hebrews the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods.” - Joseph Goebbels I've heard far too similar lines about men from certain feminists.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:14 PM
3

Judaism is a religion, but Jews are an ethnic group as well. There's atheist Jews, for instance. Jewishness is passed matrilineally.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:12 PM
4

How is this in anyway related to men's rights?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:55 PM
33

Jews are an ethnicity more so than a religion.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 08:30 AM
17

It's called a paper abortion (a legal document absolving the man of financial obligation, but also parental involvement, to the child a fetus will potentially become,) and it's discussed pretty frequently on this sub.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:31 AM
261

Personally, I think "Jews" would have been better, because bigots who think Jews hold large power in our culture are well known; the arguments in this article are all used against Jews, but not black people.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:51 AM
1

Four of five where girls doesn't bother me as much as just "four of the victims where girls," as if that's the only ones that matter. Four of five is easy math.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:26 AM
5

Yup. For the ultimate example, look at the CDC'S and any other sexual violence survey influenced by Mary Koss. Bold letters and frequent reference to rape, while showing how much more frequent it is suffered by women than men, and nearly always by a male perpetrator, while quietly hiding the vast majority of rapes of men under "made to penetrate" in "other sexual violence," right up there with unwanted kissing. Hell, they can't even be consistent between rape and made to penetrate, reporting bot…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:08 AM
2

Meh, they report on their grades as well, and it's not like they only focused on the girl victims, just casually mentioned their genders, along with some other things. Not a big deal.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:07 AM
10

Why does they, along with all the media, call Roosh V an MRA, despite his frequent mocking and disowning of it? Oh wait, that's right, to ensure MRA's maintain their lack of social legitimacy.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 12:50 AM
1

I mean, we are seeing a serious drop in the population in many countries, look at Russia, Japan. Come on lasses, take on for your country!
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:52 PM
1

Sure. www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e There used to be a good PDF of it, I can't find it on a cursory search, but it's there. An extimated 1.6 million women where victims of attempted or completed rape in the past 12 months, (nearly all by men) while an extimated 1.7 million men where a victim of only completed made to penetrate in the same time frame, with 82.6% of the perpetrators female. Not only do they not report them the same way, with attempted and complete…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:02 PM
1

Sure http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e There used to be a good PDF of it, I can't find it on a cursory search, but it's there. An extimated 1.6 million women where victims of attempted or completed rape in the past 12 months, (nearly all by men) while an extimated 1.7 million men where a victim of only completed made to penetrate in the same time frame, with 82.6% of the perpetrators female. (The 82.6% figure might only represent lifetime prevalence of made-t…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:54 PM
1

Women rape men FAR more frequently than men rape men, it just thanks to Mary Koss's influences on sexual victimization surveys, it's not called rape. The 2011 CDC SVS found 1.67 million women had been raped in the past year, vs 1.7 million men "made-to-penetrate," predominantly by women.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:17 PM
1

Rape of men is mostly done by women, at similar rates as rape of women by men mind you, unless you go the Mary Koss route and define a women mounting a unwilling man as "unwanted contact" or "made to penetrate."
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:13 PM
9

As typical, any mention of men's day by the media is all about women. Atleast they admit women are holding themselves and each other down, and that woman have strong in group bias.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:17 PM
7

Delaying puberty has a large number of side effects, and has a huge effect on gender dysphoria. Lots of people gain or loose it during puberty, and when it finishes.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 11:32 PM
7

This seems low, wouldn't arranged/forced marriages be about 1:1, or are men more accepting of their brides, I guess polygyny would affect it too.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:26 PM
2

It's an abuse of power for sure, but not criminal in the typical sense. Should lose your teaching license though.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:47 PM
17

Mostly from what I've seen, no. Engineers are generally in pretty high demand. However, they actively seek out and recruit women, while men have to do the seeking. A lot like dating, really.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 04:36 PM
1

Studs are men who have the potential to sleep with lots of women, womanizers are those who actually do.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 09:26 PM
3

The Duluth model is a good place to start if you aren't familiar
/r/MensRights11/11/16 07:19 PM
1

This just looks super fake. No way even DNC would think trump would call his own universities fake.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:23 PM
3

Wait, this article is respectful to men. It even focuses on one of the male victims. No problem here
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:13 AM
6

Edited my post a bit to reflect this
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:00 PM
45

"While in Smith’s dorm room and “feeling extremely emotional and stressed,” she told police, she boiled a pot of water. Then, she walked over to Smith and poured it on him. When Smith didn’t react strongly enough for her, she started hitting him with her open hands, she told police." Premeditated brutality. I hope the law comes down on her like it would have him, although I doubt it, especially with her being pregnant. I'm sure the media won't. Regardless, I hope he breaks up with her, and gets …
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:52 PM
1

And they sight scientist who are grossly misremembered by the general public to push this objective of the "brilliant, perfect scientist who the consensus scorned" Copernicus was a fucking idiot, just promoted a theory already discussed by the Greeks, that was EXTREMELY ad-hoc, argued largely on religious grounds, and went against the best evidence of the day, such as Tyco Brahe's unsuccessful attempts to find parallax in the stars orbits. Yes, Copernicus was right in the end, but for the wrong …
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:30 PM
–

It's just called alphabet soup
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:19 PM
–

Not trying to chide you, I've been genuinely wondering if there's any concrete evidence that Hillary directly paid for or otherwise encouraged women to accuse Trump, other than her relationship with Gloria All red. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:16 PM
13

For $43,000 dollars, you just need to be sociopathic, not delusional, to make a story line this up.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:29 AM
3

I would say "maximising the socioeconomic options of women, including past the point it severely limits men's." I doubt feminist with political power care enough about men to even hate them.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:06 AM
7

Trump promotes maternity leave, but not paternity leave...
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:43 PM
4

Ehh, plenty of people get very strong attachments to single individuals, and want the strongest sign of that our society offers. I'm sure billionaires are no different.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:51 PM
3

Not too bad, but it assumes society accepts men outside of traditional gender roles but that the failing men just aren't willing to go to them, and also blatantly states women are better at service jobs without any citations, which I certainly can't see any news organization getting away with on similar claims with d genders reversed.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:47 PM
2

Eh, capitalism's dog eat dog, and socialism's the other way around.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:23 PM
5

No, prostitution is when you mutual agree on the price before sex, this is something worse.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:09 PM
1

People in power are the loudest minority.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:06 PM
8

I've been trying to figure out if the include "attempted made-to-penetrate" in those statics, its pretty buried if they do. As far as I can tell, its "attempted and completed rape" vs "completed made-to-penetrate".
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:41 PM
0

96% effective is about on par with pulling out
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:52 PM
2

I'm disappointed this has so few upvoted and no comments, people seem more interested in outrage than activism even in this sub.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:12 PM
1

As a survivor of sexual violence myself, I'd be glad to help however I can.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:11 PM
1

By the CDC 2011 svs data, about 4 men have been raped (well, made-to-penetrate thank you very much Mary Koss) by atleast one women for every one man whose been raped by atleast one a man, even though you can't directly derive the ratio of rapists from their victims, at a 4:1 ratio it seems pretty safe to assume men are raped more frequently by women than men.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:08 AM
4

To quite the extreme, her contempt for the intelligence of her voters is impressive, though not undeserved
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:36 PM
13

I've read some of her wikileaks things, and it seems she's pandering to feminist more so than one her self.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:37 PM
1

You usually die of an infectious diseases if you get malnourished anyway, hypothermia being the next big killer
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:28 AM
1

Damn, my mechanic must have an MD!
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:22 AM
1

I just turned into a super creeper.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:20 AM
3

#1 reason to support women in the military, once they start dying people will actually care.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:15 AM
2

Should landowning men have not been able to vote prior to women getting the right to vote? Of course not. Right given to one group is still better than right given to none, and it's usually easier to fight for something on the grounds of equality/fairness than on grounds of its own merit, just as we see with calls to legalize financial abortion now.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:04 PM
3

I don't consider that valid. Yes, men should have those rights, but that doesn't mean women shouldn't until men do.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:59 PM
1

I mean, most Americans worship a sky wizard and hold in high esteem people who had political marriages at young ages.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:53 PM
3

Nothing to suggest 90% of immigrants are terrorist. Sure, a very small percentage are, and a significantly larger fraction don't have acceptable cultural norms, but it's important to not dehumanize these men as a whole through sweeping generalizations like certain feminist theories do to us.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:41 PM
1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:26 PM
2

Theres a correlation between the price of steel and global warming, that doesn't mean theres causation.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 12:49 AM
4

You seem to think women have no influence on society or men individually, that they lack any agency or responsibility for their vote, consumer spending, or education, even as the majority in all three they somehow wield no influence in society. That somehow men's preferences in women drive women's choices, but men are free from the effects of women's preferences in men.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 11:25 PM
0

Many cases of Gender Dysphoria can be reasonably considered permanent, unlike a schizophrenic delusion. In some of those cases, hormone therapy and sometimes sex reassignment surgery are the most effective ways of improving the person quality of life. Yes, there are cases where isn't the best option for the person, it possibility isn't the best option in the majority cases, but it should be a viable option in some cases.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:51 PM
14

Men are certainly marginalized in some respects by society, eg military drafts, even in countries that now register everyone men are usually expected to perform in the most deadly areas, social pressure to be the primary provider, and increasingly disadvantages in education, while women are certainly marginalized in other respects; marginalization, privilege, and related concepts are rarely unidirectional, and neither should their redress.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:35 PM
4

These are the most delightful insults I've seen in a a while
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:51 PM
3

And bisexual men. I try to pass as gay around women and lgbt folk, it's easier.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 12:59 AM
1

I'm in STL too! Message me, I'll help in anyway I can. I was raped by a women in March, and need to get my story out.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:37 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights02/10/16 02:12 PM
3

Keep in mind, made-to-penetrate isn't considered rape in these surveys, they're modeled after Mary Koss's Sexual victimization survey, with the intention to hide male victims and female perpetrators. If you look at the 12 month rates, which are much less prone to recall errors, men being made-to-penetrate is happening at the same rate as women being raped.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:52 AM
8

I love how they don't consider Made-to-penetrate as rape, so they can completely hide male victims and female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:11 AM
4

Made-to-penetrate isn't considered rape by the NVWS survey, or any similar surveys following the methodology of Mary Koss's sexual victimization survey, so geee, what a surprise women aren't sticking their penis where it doesn't belong.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:05 AM
3

Maternity leave but not paternity leave begs to differ.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:31 PM
1

Are the mods really that bad? I haven't been banned on menslib, even though I was banned from r/feminism for stupid reasons.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:10 PM
4

God thus is sickening, I hope he wins the lawsuit. Police brutally is one of the largest issues facing the MRM, we need to stand by our brothers of any race when we can.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:47 PM
7

Children and children first!
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:43 PM
2

Men can be aroused and still not want sex with someone, and erections can happen without arousal.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:54 PM
5

I like how they "broke it down by gender," then didn't mention male victims at all. Usually they do if women are any noticeablely higher.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 11:08 PM
2

Repubulicans being anti-abortion is a calculated move to APPEAL to women voters. Abortion is a much more decisive voting issue for women than men, but the demographics of hard pro-choice voters of eaither gender are much more exclusively democratic; Republicans have little to gain by appealing to pro-choice voters, while they can appeal to the sizable voting block of women who decisivly vote for pro-life candidates even though they're not really right wing in ideology.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 08:18 PM
9

"Poe's law makes this confusing, though the HuffPo lable clears things up." - Alexander Kennedy, in the comments
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:14 AM
2

I wouldn't mind if lying about being on birth control/ protection was made illegal, at least if it resulted pregnancy, similar to how its illegal to infect someone with an STD you know you have, without telling them. (Its generally not illegal to not disclose your STD status, but if you don't and they get an STD, you are liable)
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter