TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pakars Archive

View 2 posts and 119 comments by Pakars on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I gave you an upvote for properly using semicolons. Also for explaining it well, but mostly for the semicolons.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:21 AM
23

Women aren't responsible for their own actions, clearly. It's pretty bizarre to see stories like this. Edit: Just wow - He's literally being charged for not forcibly preventing a pregnant woman from doing meth.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:51 PM
1

Ah, sorry for misunderstanding your comment then.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 08:56 PM
2

look, I'm 100000% for innocent until proven guilty, but this particular case is hardly typical. You don't make exceptions from due process. Everyone's opinions don't matter unless he's charged and found guilty.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:50 PM
10

Can everyone just stop with this "trigger warning" bullshit?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:13 PM
5

I know I might get downvoted for this but I think false rape accusations are bad for society I know I might get downvoted for this downvoted for this Your worldview must be either extremely paranoid, or you seem to have forgotten where you were when you posted this comment, sir.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:43 AM
3

Seeing how pro-censorship this sub is You what. You know who else likes to stifle dissent? Hitler?
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:49 PM
13

I fully agree. I've weighed the benefits and risks, and I've decided that having relationships is not worth it. I'm pretty happy working on mastery in several subjects and having fun by myself.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:10 AM
2

Your account is barely hours old and attacks a mod, why should anyone take anything you have to say seriously? In addition, there have been a good number of [Less than a day old] accounts with no posts that have been used to attack and/or insult /u/sillymod recently. Why shouldn't I expect you to be more of the same?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:47 PM
2

I'm guessing /u/ExposingFeminists is /u/plzListen who was banned for a troll post around an hour ago. Downvote, report, and move on.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:00 PM
3

I just finished it and I agree. This is most certainly her best column/speech I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:00 PM
16

I read them! I also almost universally upvote your articles.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:49 PM
6

Hypocrites* That said, I agree with you fully. I don't bother going out of my way to help people, especially women. After all, they need me like a fish needs a bicycle. After a lifetime of getting hated, vilified, and being screwed over several times(Both personally and generally for simply being male), I just don't care. I want nothing to do with women. Why should I bother at all with people who seem to hate me? I've stuck to myself for over five years now, and I'm much happier than I used to b…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:27 AM
8

It... It's beautiful.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:28 AM
18

Exactly this. I have lost count of the number of times I have had it suggested that I should shave and get a haircut, wear/not wear this and that... I swear to God I'm going to give a huge dressing-down to the next female that tells me I need to get a shave and a haircut so I can get a date. I want nothing to do with women until I'm absolutely financially secure, and even then, I'm not going to try particularly hard.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:50 PM
5

My father has to pay lifetime alimony of approximately $400/month to one of his ex-wives. At their divorce, she took nearly everything they owned, including the child(ren). If this were not possible/did not happen, my father would have enough money to retire at a reasonable age, but he cannot because of his ex-wife and the state. I will never, ever, ever marry anyone, for any reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:24 AM
4

As true as it is, in many cases, this post is extremely rambling, especially the second and third paragraphs. Some work could turn this into a good article. On a closer look through the site, everything is as rambling as this post. It's not very good, and I really don't suggest posting more from there. If it is yours, rebelyorki, I really suggest you study writing for a month or two.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:05 PM
6

My brother and I were in the gifted program in our high school. We did a whole lot of nothing. They actually did absolutely nothing with us. We were so bored that we played with their computer systems. My brother was seen and reported by another student while he was messing with admin accounts(He got two weeks of suspension) and eventually cost the school district six. hundred. million. dollars on new security software to keep the students from doing anything they weren't supposed to do. The bes…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:48 PM
1

One of my addons was blocking the button(Ghostery). Hah. Also, I had to go through a half dozen temporarily allows on noscript, zzz.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:22 PM
1

It appears so. I can't see the comments either.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 04:16 PM
0

Agreed. If you ever argue against an ideology that is supported by the forum you are debating in(Or even in a neutral forum), you should maintain the highest standards, so that your opponents damn themselves. This has the quite happy side effect of winning over fence sitters against said ideology(For a really good example of doing this, look here(PDF file)). Eventually, if you're patient enough and persistent, you WILL get banned. That's just the way it goes. You should always make it harder for…
/r/MensRights05/07/10 05:16 AM
1

While the personal attacks are in quite poor taste(A failing of Paul Elam's posts in general), the article does have a good deal of facts and truth behind it.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 07:11 PM
3

Heh. Some things never change. You were a bit itchy on the trigger finger back at the beginning of this subreddit, too. Not quite as bad as you used to be, but it brings back memories. :)
/r/MensRights03/07/10 04:31 AM
2

Encyclopedia Dramatica has a surprisingly large store of actual historical information on it. Pretty weird, but it's the truth.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 11:46 PM
-4

Feminism: the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women above those of men. FTFY. Sorry, but that's what it's become in modern days.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 11:54 PM
0

You have once again regained the power! Buahahahahahaha!!!!!
/r/MensRights08/06/10 03:05 AM
1

Yeah, though the manhood101 people are either some truly sick individuals, or some incredibly dedicated trolls(MikeeUSA too, though I believe he's been around for longer).
/r/MensRights07/05/10 06:24 AM
0

Is there a way we can ip ban these imbeciles? They're getting rather annoying.
/r/MensRights04/05/10 07:28 PM
7

You still come here after the last time we banned you? At least you're dedicated.
/r/MensRights02/05/10 06:43 PM
11

I shared this here because the post that he made his comment in was getting a good share of downvotes. It is an excellent post and I believe more people should read it. Much of what he says to /2X can be applied in a more general sense as well. It has been said elsewhere, but it bears repeating, and kanuk did a good job of it.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 08:35 PM
4

Should just make a post that links to kanuk876's great comment here, and get that upvoted, imo. It would probably work a lot better. (Actually, I'll do that right now.)
/r/MensRights01/05/10 08:29 PM
18

I agree very much. Also, I would like to add that every time I bring up the fact that society and the real world doesn't work as one-sidedly as feminists believe(For example, "ONLY MEN CAN STOP RAPE"), I get viciously attacked, and they ignore my points altogether. This has happened many times, to many different men. It is extremely frustrating attempting to talk to or debate someone that insists that you and your problems don't matter because you're a man, even when they affect the other person…
/r/MensRights01/05/10 08:23 PM
1

Your anecdote has an Arabic man looking suspicious in a very vague manner. Which has actually become a stereotype of "islamic terrorist" post-9/11. (No, seriously)
/r/MensRights29/04/10 03:41 AM
1

And while you may have a point about women getting off easier, which I'm not disagreeing with, that's not what I'm talking about. It was what luciansolaris and mdoddr were talking about, though. While women may commit sexual crimes less often than men, we don't know how much, or even if it is less, because of the problems and double standards with society and the law! This is something we really have no solid statistics on. Any numbers you could pull up are likely to be extremely lowball because…
/r/MensRights29/04/10 03:37 AM
1

Your sentence( If you counted all the cases where there was molestation by women but it wasn't considered pedophilia it still wouldn't hold a candle to the number of men who commit sexual crimes. )is comparing: Molestation by women not considered pedophilia. (A minor subset of a minority set) and Men who commit sexual crimes. (A majority set) A more proper comparison would be to compare sexual crimes of women, to sexual crimes of men. If you wished, you could compare sexual crimes with minors of…
/r/MensRights29/04/10 02:03 AM
1

You're asking to compare a narrow range of events, to a much broader one. Of course there is magnitudes of difference, how couldn't there be? This is a horrendously bad argument.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 01:39 AM
1

If they get an easy sentence or none at all, then it won't be. But yes, the title is clearly wrong here.
/r/MensRights27/04/10 09:21 PM
5

I believe you missed this part: Kenyana McQuay, 27, and Waltia Funches, 28, told officers Warsame “was rude to them” because he didn’t hold the elevator door open as they walked into the building, and so “they had to use their fists, their bags and their feet to teach him a lesson.” It probably has little to do with feminism, but it looks pretty gender-based to me.
/r/MensRights27/04/10 08:01 PM
10

Many outspoken feminists and people that use feminist rhetoric seem to fail to grasp that concept.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 02:23 AM
5

The mens' rights subreddit existing and being active is a victory. I would also like to add that there's a fairly decent sized mens' rights community on the internet in general, and it's growing fairly quickly now-a-days.
/r/MensRights20/04/10 10:38 PM
2

-Lack of a male contraceptive. People keep trying to get this produced, but both the mainstream media and feminists both rabidly attack a male contraceptive every time one is proposed.
/r/MensRights19/04/10 03:48 AM
1

yes, be a good mangina and fall down at the first shaming language from this creature. Dissapointed as you sound quite reasonable compared to most round here. Actually, I'm not "falling down at the first shaming language X throws at me", etc. I was merely clarifying what I meant. In fact, I would warn you from using a tone and language similar to this in your posts in the future, as it is pretty close to shaming language itself. As for my own opinion, I do not agree with you in that this reddit …
/r/MensRights14/04/10 03:13 AM
1

I didn't say I agreed with him at all, I just meant to say that his post was more concise and got to about what he didn't like about /mensrights, rather than Jay's somewhat meandering post that didn't really say anything specific. I didn't quite say what I meant to say, sorry.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 07:25 PM
4

The motive for this was a post by Jay Hammers on The Spearhead(Who also comes and posts here occasionally). TheAntiFeminist made a similar post(That was better and had more legitimate complaints, imo) midway through march, but it wasn't really noticed because that site isn't visited nearly so much as The Spearhead.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 05:54 AM
1

It's posts like these that always earn you my upvotes.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 02:46 AM
1

You're arguing with nothing but thin air, frand.
/r/MensRights09/04/09 05:23 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persona <3
/r/MensRights08/04/09 12:18 PM
2

Just so you know: You read it wrong. That statement's meaning is that calling someone a coward for not putting someone else's life above your own just because of who they are is stupid. In this case, the "privilege" is belonging to a group of people that you believe deserves to be protected by another, perhaps "lesser", group of people, while in reality, they have no obligation to do so whatsoever. Not because of "being able to be dragged by one's hair and raped seems less like privilege to me."…
/r/MensRights08/04/09 06:42 AM
2

Where did-- Wait... Yeah, trolls seem to be pretty common today, no matter where I go.
/r/MensRights08/04/09 02:41 AM
1

You fail at reading comprehension. I'm tempted to call you a troll, for misrepresenting my arguments. Just for the sake of doing so(And because other people seem to have the same failure in reading comprehension), I'll explain wtf you did wrong here in this edit. 1. You're saying that a woman who's getting raped by a guy is a coward because she couldn't fight the guy off on her own? No. Where the fuck did you get that idea? I'm saying calling someone a coward for not putting themselves on the li…
/r/MensRights07/04/09 05:58 PM
8

That's... pretty messed up. It's kinda their job description. You know, preventing crime and all that.
/r/MensRights06/04/09 11:01 PM
17

Yeah, that's an excellent point, and something I completely agree with. I may choose to go and physically try to help, but if someone believes they deserve my protection just because I may be nearby, they can go fuck themselves. I am not responsible for a random stranger's well-being, unless I choose to join the police force or a job of that nature. Calling someone a coward for acting responsibly and logically like this is attempting to absolve yourself(and the privileged few in your group, in t…
/r/MensRights06/04/09 10:29 PM
4

"Women Behaving Badly", I believe.
/r/MensRights18/03/09 05:19 PM
21

I guess if you write an essay called "Why I hate men," this is kind of what you should expect. That just... might... be possible! At least those who perpetrate crimes against women and those who do nothing to stop it. ... and those who do nothing to stop it. And from the middle of the article: The men who regularly get very offended on this blog, protesting that they have never hurt a fly, probably do not do an awful lot to stop other men harming women. I prevented a rape today. I was biking dow…
/r/MensRights09/03/09 06:01 AM
9

I go away for a day, and come back to see this. o.O sigh
/r/MensRights26/02/09 11:36 PM
4

One thing I don't like is how all of you(Redditors in general, especially ones that strongly believe something about a subject), tend to downvote so much, especially about things you disagree with. I show things I've liked/disliked, and I reserve downvotes for exceptionally stupid things, spam, things that I really don't care about, etc(And the occasional article that's just plain wrong, like that copypasta article from jezebel.com(It was posted, almost exactly word for word, on dozens of "news"…
/r/MensRights21/02/09 08:05 PM
1

So... What was the point of posting this? Serious question. This has little to nothing to do with mensrights.
/r/MensRights21/02/09 07:51 PM
1

In the actual story he linked to, apparently, she also went and did some mudslinging: The motion goes on to state that the victim, before he dropped out of school, publicly admitted to being voluntarily sexually active and using illegal drugs since he was 12 years old. It also states the victim has admitted to being a pornography addict. ...Which has nothing to do whether or not what she did was legal. If the charges are dropped, I may as well go out and have sex with a minor myself, damn! </sar…
/r/MensRights20/02/09 07:11 PM
1

I don't intend on ever getting married... so... Meh.
/r/MensRights20/02/09 07:09 PM
1

Bawwww, I hurt some poor baby's feelings, and they're downvoting all my comments. Waaah! If you disagree with me, or don't like what I say, post a comment and grow the fuck up. (I'm posting this here cause it's not likely to get any more comments than it has)
/r/MensRights20/02/09 07:06 PM
6

Yeah, that argument of not having any control of yourself or responsibility while drunk(Only women, though!) is completely stupid. If they seriously believe that shit, it's more than fair to believe that "Men are animals, and they don't have any control over themselves(Some feminists have said this part), thus, they don't need to have any responsibility". The entire argument is utterly unfounded, and has no basis in reality. Seriously, if you tried that crap on a D.U.I. accident charge, you'd be…
/r/MensRights20/02/09 06:48 PM
11

Fail. Even people you do know can and will make false rape claims about you. I'd link some stories, but they're not hard to find in here. Real solution: Celibacy(And even then, you might still get accused).
/r/MensRights20/02/09 06:45 PM
1

After reading through it, it's a pretty good book. I've also seen some of the things it talks about and quotes in real life, when they happened. Edit: Oh, and I really like how the sources are properly cited. Brings tears to my eyes.
/r/MensRights19/02/09 06:13 AM
0

Mmmm, delicious downvotes for saying that I don't trust women enough to date them, due to events in my past that I've mostly gotten over. Post a comment if you downvoted saying why, you bloody cowards.
/r/MensRights19/02/09 05:36 AM
0

It was edited to clarify about an hour after it was posted, fyi(I tend to do that to a lot of my comments, because I usually write too harshly the first time, and the point I'm trying to make gets lost). Not after you posted linking to my comment. Maybe I should timestamp all my edits! (5:43 GMT, Feb 19. Original posting time 5:30 GMT, Feb 19) </sarcasm> ... On second thought, that actually does sound like a good idea, because I get "edited...?" a lot after someone reads my post wrong or assumes…
/r/MensRights19/02/09 05:29 AM
0

Yes, "fair play" is a common feature in soccer :) The teams will some times give up their right over the ball if the other team had an injured player, even though they have no obligation at all to do so. Who'd have guessed a bunch of brute men could be so courteous, specially when victory is at stake? Having played soccer(In high school), I can back this up, especially since my team usually had extremely powerful kicks(Injured players on the opposing team were frequent). :)
/r/MensRights19/02/09 02:04 AM
0

Your job, men: Make sure your sweetie gets regular checkups and takes care of herself. Why is it my job?
/r/MensRights19/02/09 01:59 AM
-2

Well, comparing the two isn't really a good comparison. The minorities movement went and got the same rights for minorities, as well as some protections(like against hate crimes). Here, "whiterights" isn't really a concern, since we don't have any problems with minorities > whites(Except in perhaps some extremely fringe cases?). The feminism movement, however, got women the rights that men have held, but with less responsibility(See: Selective service, etc.), and the ability to completely screw …
/r/MensRights19/02/09 01:30 AM
0

Apparently, it goes to my comment, which in no way expresses that opinion.
/r/MensRights19/02/09 01:25 AM
-1

Maybe you should learn reading comprehension? It's one of the reasons I won't trust women any more, as far as dating anyways(The other reasons being personal, and the cause of much anger in my past). Isn't "all women are evil from my experiences". It's "I can't trust women enough to date them(At least, for quite a substantial period of time), due to my past experiences." Take it off the list.
/r/MensRights19/02/09 01:18 AM
-1

Indeed. The major point about what this guy is saying is that a woman can screw up a man's life legally, with little or no recourse for the man. It's one of the reasons I won't trust women any more, as far as dating anyways(The other reasons being personal, and the cause of much anger in my past).
/r/MensRights17/02/09 12:15 AM
1

Very, very long, but the author definitely knows how to write a proper debate/refutation type post(I don't know who's downvoting... It has full quotes and everything).
/r/MensRights14/02/09 05:18 AM
6

I actually lol'd when I read this. Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/02/09 01:49 AM
1

I love satire so much. :) The great thing about satire is how it so obviously shows wrongs in front of everybody(And for those who already know of such wrongs, it's just hilarious to read).
/r/MensRights12/02/09 08:50 PM
1

It's fake, guys. Just downvote the story.
/r/MensRights07/02/09 09:43 PM
7

Indeed. Having fired rifles myself, it's more than a little difficult to "accidentally" hit someone's head from 150 feet away. Especially a moving target. Like vostran said: That's what, hitting something the size of a water melon at 150ft, something the size of a large apple or orange at 50ft and something the size of a golf ball at about 10ft. Not bad, not bad at all. Considering it's a moving target then she'd had to have been a pretty good shot to intentionally do this with just one round. I…
/r/MensRights04/02/09 11:06 PM
2

Gratz to him, and I do indeed like the new logo.
/r/MensRights31/01/09 03:48 AM
4

I'm sorry; Are we or are we not talking about the quote in the video? You know: REICH: I am concerned, as Im sure many of you are, that these jobs not simply go to high-skilled people who are already professionals or to white male construction workersI have nothing against white male construction workers, Im just saying there are other people who have needs as well. ? Yes, I have looked at the stimulus package. I was not talking about the stimulus package. I was talking in context to the video h…
/r/MensRights30/01/09 08:45 PM
2

Yeah, lets punish white male construction workers for the bailouts the (mostly white male) banks got, despite the fact that the two sectors are completely different in every form, simply because they share the same gender and race. What kind of fucking idiot are you?
/r/MensRights30/01/09 08:11 PM
2

Link? Just for comparison?
/r/MensRights28/01/09 10:29 PM
3

I agree. Even though I think articles like this are pretty terrible, the discussions they usually prompt are worth reading most of the time.
/r/MensRights26/01/09 10:39 PM
8

It's probably the people who hate pn6 because of posts he's done before(some of the rabidly anti-feminism ones), and auto-downvote his entire account or something.
/r/MensRights26/01/09 09:27 PM
8

Indeed they are. However, I attacked the article, because it has a lot of spin off of Stephen's paper, and it comes to conclusions that he did not even hint at. The article also misrepresents "income". In the paper, he was looking at available income, not income generated, as this article is saying. Comparing his paper to this article just makes the person(s) who wrote the article(s)(There's a lot about the same paper, probably copypasta'd between all the news sites) look foolish.
/r/MensRights26/01/09 09:16 PM
11

This is my post from the one in the women's subreddit, where I first saw this: Good god, this article is full of spin off of Stephen Jenkins' paper(Available here). From his paper: The patterns of income changes between men, women and children correspond closely to those found in earlier studies, and Jarvis and Jenkins (1999), in particular. Separating wives and children fare much worse than separating husbands. According to the ‘all waves’ estimates, the median income change for separating wive…
/r/MensRights26/01/09 09:12 PM
10

And... if it was accepted that "she cheated on him", it would be blamed on the man anyways. sigh
/r/MensRights24/01/09 04:23 AM
1

Urdoinitrite.
/r/MensRights22/01/09 02:51 AM
9

And lest all of this look like “personal choice,” when the researchers asked 8,700 faculty members in the University of California system about family and work issues, nearly 40 percent of the women agreed with the statement, “I had fewer children than I wanted,” compared with less than 20 percent of the men. The take-home message, Dr. Mason said in a telephone interview, is, “Men can have it all, but women can’t.” Sooooo..... This person is obviously an idiot? This article just oozes bias, and …
/r/MensRights21/01/09 08:44 PM
3

Yeah, the people saying stupid shit like that obviously have no idea what they are talking about. Work is freaking work, dammit. The breaks you get aren't very long, and you aren't dicking around all day, either. Just comparing the two, homemaking and say, a senior software management position making $90K/year(read: senior tech troubleshooter), is stupid. When you're homemaking, you quickly finish things that need doing, and then you have to make stuff up to do or dick around the rest of the day…
/r/MensRights01/01/09 07:24 PM
9

Hey look, someone who knows what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights01/01/09 06:38 PM
1

Other people in the house downloading mass files making me triple post ftl. >.<
/r/MensRights30/12/08 01:41 PM
1

Your comment just made me Jizz In My Pants.
/r/MensRights30/12/08 08:12 AM
3

Well, yeah. That's how it is. I just wish it weren't like that. Getting penalized for what others have done is frustrating as all hell.
/r/MensRights28/12/08 09:37 PM
1

Yeah. Though I'm used to forums where a couple paragraphs is called a wall of text...
/r/MensRights28/12/08 09:29 PM
3

When the schools and teachers don't believe in the students, the students naturally take a "I don't care" attitude. That's completely true. Boys are treated like everything bad, and even when they succeed it is not rewarded or appreciated*, and so they might as well act the way they are seen. When you don't live up to the stereotype of the lazy, useless boy, you don't get rewarded for being smart(You either get ignored, or on the fringe, rebuked(!!)). It's sad, but true.
/r/MensRights28/12/08 08:24 PM
6

Oh damn, just realized that I made a wall of text. Wall of text hits you for over 9000(1509147 overkill)(critical)
/r/MensRights28/12/08 08:20 PM
10

Being one of the smarter males in school(Graduated high school 2 years ago, hated it with a vengeance), I can verify that this is completely true. It is extremely difficult to get any sort of acceptance when you're one of the "smart guys", especially when you make it look easy(Sometimes literally sleeping through class to get A's). Another thing I've noticed is that the system is set up so you have to make them give you the harder classes if you're one of these guys(You have to beg, wheedle, and…
/r/MensRights28/12/08 08:17 PM
1

Just maybe.
/r/MensRights24/12/08 07:31 AM
1

Smelling like an ogre because you don't wash is natural as well. :eyeroll:
/r/MensRights21/12/08 06:42 AM
0

Yeah. It's pretty awful.
/r/MensRights19/12/08 10:35 PM
1

Yeah, it does.
/r/MensRights15/12/08 05:21 PM
1

23 minutes, but all of it very good.
/r/MensRights15/12/08 05:07 AM
2

tl;dr version: OHMIGAWD, HIS PLAN IS TO CREATE JOBS THAT CREATE EXPORTABLE GOODS, ARE BUILT AROUND ENERGY SELF-SUFFICIENCY FOR THE COUNTRY, AND MAINTENANCE/CONSTRUCTION FOR THE COUNTRY, ALL OF WHICH ARE STAFFED BY MOSTLY MEN, INSTEAD OF PANDERING COMPLETELY TO MY GENDER AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ECONOMY/COUNTRY!!!!1111oneoneeleventyone!!1 :facepalm: This is filled with such flawed reasoning and leaps of logic, I don't even know where to start. The average New Yorker’s greenhouse gas footprint is onl…
/r/MensRights15/12/08 04:09 AM
1

What he's responding to, by the way: BARACK OBAMA has announced a plan to stimulate the economy by creating 2.5 million jobs over the next two years. He intends to use the opportunity to make good on two campaign promises — to invest in road and bridge maintenance and school repair and to create jobs that reduce energy use and emissions that lead to global warming. Mr. Obama compared his infrastructure plan to the Eisenhower-era construction of the Interstate System of highways. It brings back t…
/r/MensRights15/12/08 03:59 AM
2

True, but then there's unequal rulings about these things in blatantly extreme favor of the women, whereas if a man did the same thing with the genders reversed, everyone and their grandmother would be crying "RAPE, RAPE, RAAAPPEEEEEEE!". It is quite unnerving to know that simply because of a trait you are born with, that you'll get a far harsher sentence even with a lesser crime!
/r/MensRights09/12/08 02:21 PM
3

Fuck. I just lost the game. Bastard.
/r/MensRights07/12/08 04:42 AM
2

Looking through your comments, it's quite obvious that you definitely know what you're talking about. Keep up the good fight. (P.S. My identical twin brother is circumcised, but I'm not, and it's quite obvious he doesn't have as much feeling as I do. Even though it was for medical reasons, its still bleh.)
/r/MensRights05/12/08 08:45 AM
2

And then the idiots voted down your comment as well, despite being very informative and truthful.
/r/MensRights05/12/08 05:21 AM
1

Wow, just wow.
/r/MensRights27/11/08 05:20 AM
6

I wish I had more than 4(Showed it to my RL friends. :D).
/r/MensRights27/11/08 04:51 AM
1

"The evidence is that women are not more risk-averse, but they are more risk-aware." Among other quotes. Someone's definitely not living in reality, and it ain't me.
/r/MensRights25/11/08 04:58 AM
1

Well, yes. There is that... sigh
/r/MensRights24/11/08 04:36 AM
1

I lol'd at the completely tarded comments in that post, then promptly downvoted them. The thing is... Who cares that she's a woman? She broke the law and got less than another person for the same exact crime.
/r/MensRights23/11/08 09:39 PM
7

Definitely feasible. Two years ago in high school, I had a female math teacher like that(substitute). I refused to be "disciplined" and continued going to class anyways(We had one of those school cameras for the school end of week video in the room at the time, which I had to go ask to get used to prove I was respectful at all times.). I got a week of 0's, but they never fucked with me again.
/r/MensRights23/11/08 09:28 PM
2

This is an excellent excerpt. I think I'm going to go out and read the full book.
/r/MensRights23/11/08 05:39 AM
6

Yeah. I've chosen to not participate in this madness as well. In high school/college I was always in that large group of girls, being friends with most of them, and GOOD LORD, they were fucking tards. About one in twenty were actually intelligent and more deep than a puddle(And, subsequently, were getting tons of hawt secks all the time from their boyfriends, and obviously enjoyed it). The rest of them... Well... They complained about everything, wanted everything without even asking for it or d…
/r/MensRights21/11/08 07:43 AM
2

Reminds me of what used to be my high school news(lol)paper. shudder
/r/MensRights18/11/08 11:01 PM
1

Wow, these two are some of the most childish "adults" I've ever had the unpleasantness to read about. They should be ashamed of themselves. Especially the mother, for the way she's been acting. At least the father has had some dignity in his posts. She's just going in ALL CAPS WHEE! and being a total bitch... and publicly gloating about it. Damn fools.
/r/MensRights13/11/08 12:23 AM
3

Indeed. This was a pretty good post, but the current "feminism" is broken. Many "feminists" I've met acted as though they were far better than I was... and then proceeded to act out one of the many stereotypes of women. I couldn't possibly join any such movement whose ideal promotes such hypocrisy. Equal rights and all, but their rights end where mine begin, and I've had to enforce that violently, at times(Idiots thought it's perfectly fine to hit a man(With sharp/heavy objects sometimes) withou…
/r/MensRights26/10/08 05:32 PM
-1

Oh, burn.
/r/MensRights26/10/08 05:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter