TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pake1000 Archive

View 0 posts and 512 comments by Pake1000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You’re trying to claim a bunch of random people you know nothing about as being either leaders or the majority opinion. Do you think it would be fair to consider Andrew Tate as a leader of MRA and that majority of MRA are as extreme as him? How about all the Proud Boys?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:16 AM
0

who are actual notable figures within the feminist movement Notable within the feminist movement? Are you a member of the feminist movement? Because if not, making the claim that they are considered notable is horseshit. That's like me saying Elliot Rodger is a notable member of the MRA movement after the fact. As you mentioned, MRA has Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson, both known to be extremely toxic individuals who also prey on the vulnerable.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:28 PM
0

Actually yes, I will call your bluff and would love for you to link to posts on feminist subs advocating for the killing of men and having a positive vote count.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:49 AM
-10

Meanwhile on the MRA side... Before you complain, MRA members did its best to argue this guy was really a misandrist and to ignore everything he said in his manifest. What's really interesting is how MRA members convince each other that all feminists are extremists, but don't apply the same standard to themselves. However in terms of violence, more women have been killed by people subscribing to anti-feminists/women philosophies.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:27 PM
-13

https://imgur.com/UhJlGVp That's a screenshot from years and years ago. The user deleted the post, but was never banned from the sub. At one point on this sub users were pushing to celebrate a Marc Lépine Day by arguing that these things wouldn't happen if it wasn't for "misandrist feminists".
/r/MensRights04/07/23 05:31 PM
-18

Sit on MRA long enough and you'll find more than enough post from men on here advocating to kill women, specifically feminists. Then you search the news and you find out some don't just advocate, but follow through with it.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:37 PM
2

The figures that push this cruel practice, remember that they’re “men of the cloth”. If you want to fix most of men’s problems, you need to hold the men causing those problems accountable. They tend to be conservatives and claim to be alpha males.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:46 AM
-21

You’re ignoring the fact that those courses are getting GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES to make them cheaper. Why should they be benefiting from subsides and careers like nurses and teachers are not? How fucking ignorant are you to think we don’t need teachers and nurses? I’m mean it’s pretty fucking clear that you can’t read the quoted text, that’s for sure. No wonder people see this sub as being full of incels with people like you on here.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:47 AM
-18

Many traditionally feminised professions — like teaching and nursing — were absorbed into the university system and became more expensive to study. Meanwhile, the more male-dominated trades stayed in the Vocational Education and Training (VET) system — and those courses often attract government subsidies. Men are getting more assistance from government subsidies, and yet you’re blaming women for taking on more debt when we need more teachers and nurses? Great job posting an article about male pr…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:34 AM
-8

You're upset that they sound blatantly anti-men, so you decide to post here, a sub where a lot of blatantly anti-women partake? PS: Example, the thread about starting a women's CS league. People here are whining and saying "if they're good, why do they need their own league?" Everyone knows it's not about that. You know their goal is to promote gaming for girls by creating a better environment for them to play, free of the extremely vulgar and misogynistic commentary they're often subjected to. …
/r/MensRights23/12/21 11:05 PM
3

I have never in my life been asked the first or last question in an interview.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/21 09:31 PM
2

That shouldn't be surprising when the left wing tend to support equal rights. Assuming this gets voted on, right wing Republicans will likely unanimously vote against it and left wing Democrats will be split. They'll be split not for the reason you might think, but because some would like to see selective service go away rather than expanded. Republicans will shoot it down because they dislike women in the military.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/21 01:14 AM
11

Use them as shields.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/21 01:07 AM
1

Thanks for continuing to promote the ignorance that all feminists are extremists and for continuing to spread that propaganda into this sub. Instead of those of us who are males trying to figure out how to actually solve male specific problems, we'll just take your advice and blame women or feminists instead. Male lawmakers keeping selective service only for men? Why blame the male politicians when we can blame women and feminist who largely don't support selective service! Not enough men gettin…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 09:23 PM
1

Answers are given to questions. There are no questions being asked. Keep blaming women and feminists for male suicide. It just proves your ignorance and hate.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 08:17 PM
1

Generalizing all feminists as being extremists when the number of extremist feminists is insignificant is ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:35 PM
0

Rich that you're talking about character assassination given your history on Reddit attacking feminists. All one has to do is click on your name and do a Ctrl+F for 'femin' to see how much hatred you have. If you don't like character assassination, then don't mention people's family or parents first as you did against me. Hell, you couldn't even go that post without making some ridiculous anti-feminist comment. It's funny that you are accusing me of saying that male suicide is the fault of men, …
/r/MensRights01/06/21 02:30 PM
-2

Thanks for not responding to my single comment and using deflective and offensive language. I responded appropriately to someone who is only here trying to stir up shit by blaming women or feminists. If you didn't want deflective and offensive language, then you shouldn't be on here doing it yourself. Well, read again and again - which part of my comments blamed women it blamed feminists! Here's a link to your profile. You can do a search and find all the times you blame feminists. https://www.r…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 11:48 AM
-5

Take note that the three articles you mentioned, NONE of them blame women or feminists, or even come close to blaming them like you have a habit of doing. Educate with appropriate Resources. I'd argue you should do that instead of constantly blaming other women for all your problems in life. Don't go to feminist forum and get info. I don't. I also suggest you stop visiting anti-feminists subs and bringing that toxic bullshit back to this sub. So, being picky to argue is not good. Please please r…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 10:47 AM
-5

Here's an example of one of those raging anti-women and anti-feminists idiots: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/np7d9a/study_of_1500_men_who_committed_suicide_91_had/h05k7ps/?context=3
/r/MensRights01/06/21 08:49 AM
–

Sounds like men aren't wanting to be clinical psychologist, but given how many on this sub are raging anti-women, guaranteed we'll see post blaming women and feminism for no legitimate reason. Edit: Yup, just as predicted there are lots of raging misogynists whining about women and feminists for no reason. Take this lovely example with positive karma showing how this sub changed from being about helping men to just being another anti-women bashing sub. The majority of women are as capable of car…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:26 AM
1

That's just another nearly couple hours of Peterson speaking out of his ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 08:48 PM
-4

Things Peterson failed to mention: Most legislatures are men and those men send men off to war. Majority of perpetrators that commit violent crimes against men are men, which leads to more men going to jail. Peterson needs to tell the full story. As it stands, he's showing his bias and this is far from a 'pussy pass denied' situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/21 02:47 PM
1

If you're a 60 yr old priest, you won't ever see a jail, but you will get to move to the Vatican.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 08:11 PM
-5

Republicans don't want unity, so her comment is factually wrong. As for the time women are criticized, it's pretty obvious when it's sexist. The sexist, like Donald Trump, consistently use more derogatory terms towards females than males. You can be critical of someone's agenda without resorting to derogatory terms, but Republicans haven't figured that one out yet. They prefer to live in the 1920's rather than the 2020's.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:19 PM
1

Republicans refused to participate in the process. There's nothing the Democrats can do to force their participation. But here you are blaming Democrats for a choice Republicans made. American conservative politicians historically have been more hypocritical than liberals. That's simply a fact. They are the party of projection. Every time they accuse liberals of something, you can be sure it's only because conservatives are currently doing it.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 11:53 PM
-1

They had weeks to review second of the bill sat a time. Republicans refused to read the parts as they came and refused to work with Democrats. They knew from the start they were all going to vote no. Both sides suck, but Republicans are significantly worse.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 10:16 PM
2

two sides to that coin. the Democrats under Nancy "you have to pass the bill to know what's in it" Pelosi are notorious for drafting garbage bills and omnibus packages that blend in tons of garbage with one key piece of legislation, and ensuring that there's parts in the bill that the GOP can't accept, only to then trot around that sort of "party of no" rhetoric. Except that is all horseshit. For instance, Republicans had the ACA bill in their hands and refused to read it, then claimed they were…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 09:40 PM
2

He's literally know as the grim reaper of bills because he refuses to work with Democrats on anything. Even amongst Republicans, it's his way out no way. He literally the only one of the two the Haas publicly stated he will guarantee a president only last for a single term. McConnell is far, far wise if a human being and representative than Pelosi.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:29 PM
-3

And then you have people like Trump and McConnell in politics who are easily the most hostile, far more than Pelosi.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 05:46 PM
1

A video of of people that you can barely hear, understand, or read their entire sign. No, I'm not happy because the context is still not clear.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 10:51 AM
1

People on here blindly trusting the OP based on a screeancap instead of asking to see the video for full context is hilarious and sad. Really shows how easy it is to manipulate people.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 10:23 AM
1

Or rather you and the assholes like you that are taking over this sub can fuck off. Let it turn back into a sub discussing men's issues instead of crying about feminism and women like edgy 14 yr old assholes. Tell the rest of the sub about this post of yours. I’m a psychologist and Analyst, Actually 99% of the children who grew/grow up in single mother houses are sexually and mentally abused by their own mothers. The other 1% has undoubtedly suffered/suffer (Though minor kind) but some form or d…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 10:23 AM
1

Then change the fucking sub name from MRA to Anti-feminism and let the original MRA people know that this sub has been taken over by assholes and it no longer represents then.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:55 AM
0

Should men get severe PTSD from the process of being cleared by the justice system, with a rooftop risk of suicide, because they've been treated like sub-humans during the whole process? Should investigations into sexual assault allegations not happen? Should victims of sexual assault just shut the fuck up and continue to be treated like sub-humans that were "asking for it" during the whole process? Clearly it was her fault for wearing that shirt that showed a bit of cleavage or his fault for we…
/r/MensRights15/08/20 05:05 PM
1

It was explained to me the only thing necessary for a sexual assault allegation to meet probable cause is a reputable accuser. That is it. If the court believes the girl that made an accusation is of sound mind and body, and the accusation sounds possible, they have probable cause to bring charges to court martial. Not trying to dismiss what happened to you, but this part isn't true. Very few sexual assault cases with reputable accusers ever qualify as having probable cause and leading to charge…
/r/MensRights15/08/20 12:08 PM
1

Trying to claim any Abrahamic religious text treats men and women as equals as it most disingenuous claim you could make. That's become MR you.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:17 PM
1

Actual history: Politics being largely influenced by religion and the way society has operated has been influence by religion. Your claim of history: Politics aren't influence by religion. We have never had countries ruled by religious laws.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:17 AM
1

I think you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. That's fine. I know you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about because your argument gets shot down by actual history.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:03 AM
1

I'm sure you are also far more willing to listen to Trump, since Peterson fans and Trump fans are damn near 1:1.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:33 AM
-1

Jordan Peterson is the quintessential example of saying something with confidence that might sound profound on its surface, but as you dig the slightest bit in, you learn it masking a large pile of bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:28 AM
-1

What I'm trying to say is that what feminists decry as "patriarchy" was actually a decentralized and complex set of norms and behaviors that had a lot more give and take than commonly depicted. That set of norms was not about setting the man above the woman as some kind of slavemaster, but as a way to set both genders duties and privileges so that babies can be born safely, society can continue to function and the state has soldiers for its wars. Except that the Bible and most religious text sta…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:34 AM
2

I'd love to see you justify your second paragraph. I'll be honest, I highly doubt you can make s convincing argument towards that opinion. Same goes for your comment of how feminism and the left wing has evolved. Are you really able to make a good argument given how the right wing has evolved into a very anti-intellectual movement?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:23 AM
1

Millennial here. Still socialist. You'd had to be an idiot to think tying your health care plan to an employer is better than a single payer system or than reducing taxes on the millionaires and billionaires will "trickle down".
/r/MensRights04/08/20 10:43 PM
1

yet, I'm not seeing it anywhere in that link. Because you didn't bother going past the first page. There are more than enough peer reviewed studies that you can read through. https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/malecircumcision/en/ It's not even really the same topic. You said they were typically against genital mutilation, they're really only concretely against FGM, but I brought up an instance where they actually supported it for us under the guise of 'women's health', and... you decide to instead get…
/r/MensRights06/07/20 01:42 AM
1

The initial studies showed it did work and actually worked in favor of men by reducing their risk by 60%: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/
/r/MensRights06/07/20 12:27 AM
1

Actually to me it seems clear as day that you're here on r/mra to trash men's rights activists. I'd like to see this sub return to it's roots where it gave a shit about men's issues instead of what it has become, a secondary /r/antifeminists sub. It's time to remove the anti-feminists trolls and get back to fighting the actual problems.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 10:39 PM
1

Telling me what I'm doing, especially when it's in direct opposition to what I believe I'm doing, isn't a good way to make allies. What you claim you are doing and what you are doing are nearly opposites from an outsider's perspective. And then you're telling me that feminists are my allies in this fight, contradicting my stated experiences, which are, again, the opposite of what you're claiming. Yes, I am. In fact, I honestly question how much time you have spent discussing genital mutilation w…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 09:41 PM
1

You're spending more time attacking feminists over MGM than the religious representatives that created and push for genital mutilation of both sexes. You're not helping by attacking the ally (feminists) in this battle and ignoring the real culprits (religions).
/r/MensRights05/07/20 08:35 PM
1

Feminists? No, they are typically against genital mutilation. Religion though, ones predominately run by men, are your main abusers..
/r/MensRights05/07/20 12:26 PM
-20

About as accurate as the MRA's guide on how to gaslight women. Shows Feelings? Yes -> Treat like a child No - > Treat like a bitch. Now, how about people stop turning this sub into you bullshit anti-feminist playground? How about helping return it to discussing real issues affecting men and how to solve them without resorting to blaming everyone else and doing nothing? MRA is never going to be respected by the masses when people keep upvoting OP's stupid shit.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:42 AM
1

Sure, I recognize both males and females are out there that don't support rape victims. I recognize that the worst offenders of not believing male rape victims are fellow men. I also recognize that a number of members of this community are trying to manipulate this community into being both an anti-women and anti-feminism for not legitimate reason. I also recognize that some people in the feminists community are guilty of the same manipulation. Unlike you, I want to drive out those toxic individ…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 08:11 PM
1

There hasn't been decades of oppression.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 08:08 PM
1

Men. Specifically men within the MRA community refuse to blame men when it is warranted. That is the community that I have continuously spoke about.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 06:47 PM
1

I'm not, but apparently some idiots on here are trying to claim I am.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 06:46 PM
1

A critique of feminism isn't an attack on women, but a number of people on here are attacking both.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 06:45 PM
1

Oof, took one look at your post history. NPCs get blocked <3 Trying to run away again? Don't worry, I'll keep tagging you u/GitGudScrubzzz so that you can't get far. Looking at your post history, you are the epitome of a deranged person. All you do is insult people, call them NPC's, etc. Nothing productive, just trash talk.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:48 PM
1

woosh That's the sound of what I was doing going compete over your head. I suggest you read that comment a second time, maybe a third, and a fourth, to understand what I was demonstrating.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:36 PM
1

No, you really didn't do anything. Your personality reminds me a lot of Trump's.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:28 PM
0

Men are the ones the typically shame their own, just as women typically shame their own. Shame on you for trying to spread your toxicity. I don't know what's worse, your comments here or the ones where you try to protect the churches that continue to shield child molesters from justice. Not very men's rights when you're doing the latter either, so that's definitely the worst.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:22 PM
1

You haven't given one.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:21 PM
1

I'd start with blaming religion for instilling gender roles onto people. The idea of men being the leaders of a family and women being servant to the men. Feminists, lmfao. The world would be better without you. Once again you show your unwillingness to be civil with that comment. It's becoming evident that you lack a real argument on this discussion.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 01:25 PM
1

Is simply an idiotic statement and demonstrates why feminists and MRAs can never be allies. Judges, lawyers, police officers, do not exist in a cultural vacuum. Just like everyone else, they are raised predominantly by women in a society that is 50% women. Here's the facts: "Today, more than 73 percent of sitting federal judges are men and 80 percent are white." 85.3% of Police officers are Male Over 60% of lawyers are men. Men are preventing men from being treated fairly on certain issues. You …
/r/MensRights30/05/20 01:03 PM
1

Full context is important. It's far too easy to strip away the context and weaponize a single sentence for your purpose.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 12:27 PM
1

No. Feminists indeed erase male victims. No, they don't. That is a delusion belief if you have that. When was the last time you saw feminists admit that men raped by women make up a large portion of rape victims, or that women make up a large portion of rapists? Quite often actually. They just lie and claim that most rapists are men by pointing to crime statistics - ignoring the fact that female rapists are largely ignored by the legal system. Majority of the legal system is male. You want to fi…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:45 AM
1

The only people here that are toxic are the one's that think feminism or women are responsible for every problem men have. This is r/MensRights. This is NOT r/antifeminist or r/antiwomen.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:40 AM
1

To be perfectly frank, there's no distinction between the two anymore. Sounds a lot like what this sub has become. It went from being about fighting for equality on men's issue to a sub full of radicals who want to destroy all women.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:37 AM
1

How are male rape victims at fault? That's not what that comment is saying. What's truly disgusting is that you know you can't win an argument without misrepresenting someone's comment.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:36 AM
1

Feminism = Ideology Women = Sex/Gender Congrats on understanding something so basic. Not sure why you think anyone gets that confused though.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:34 AM
-1

Yes, it is about women (specifically women who are feminists).
/r/MensRights30/05/20 03:02 AM
0

A male rape victim's story was literally deleted by moderators in a post discussion circlejerking about how evil men because it disagreed and provided a counterpoint to their views. No. It was deleted because it violated the rule 4: Relevance: Please submit content that is relevant to our experiences as women, for women, or about women. Quit the bullshit. TwoX is a sub to discuss topics specifically about women. Because the topic is about women and feminists being blamed for an issue it isn't so…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:53 AM
0

And feminism is an ideology that erases male victims and attacks people who try to help them. No it isn't. That's alt right propaganda bullshit that's been plaguing this community. women and feminists are not the same thing. Glad you understand that simple concept. what does that even mean? It means that this community is unwilling to blame it's own even when they're at fault. Even when faced with hard evidence, it doubles down on its attacks, hoping to distract rather than resolve.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:39 AM
0

This community WAS a huge reason male rape victims were finally getting attention. I'd argue that is no longer the case since the anti-women/feminist trolls have taken it over and took it far away from that path. It's become less of a rights community and more of a "let's blame women and feminists for everyone's problem" community. Anybody who supports gender equality is anti-feminist, obviously. Anyone that supports gender equality is both a feminist and a MRA. But who here is anti-women? A shi…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:38 AM
3

Sources please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 01:51 AM
-3

I blame this community for not actually helping, because it's been overrun by a bunch of anti-women/anti-feminists. Those assholes prey on victims to recruit them into their bullshit cause. Same shit happened over on KiA where it went from being about ethics in journalism to the malt-right alt sub it is today. Also, regarding your post title, it's wrong and is even go as far as calling it clickbait (which violates this sub's rule on titles). TwoX is a sub to discuss topics specifically about wom…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 01:41 AM
-2

As a male, you're more likely to be ignored by our own. We have a problem with this community being taking over by people who want to turn the goal into an anti-women and anti-feminism one, instead of a community that works to fix problems. Seeing all the idiots on here blaming women and feminists for problems they aren't responsible for is getting old, and it's no wonder this community is being looked down on. MRA has turned into the Trump of the rights community.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 01:23 AM
1

I don't see a third party murdering someone as you claimed.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 01:08 AM
1

You said If you're looking for direct evidence then there are very few examples of feminists actually trying to murder people outright. The reason for this though is because very often they use third parties for their violence mostly they like to rely on the state to commit their violence for them. If you're going to make such a claim, instead of trying to deflect to Cardi B, post sources that support your claim of feminists using third parties.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 01:02 AM
1

That's a bit of a cop-out since this is a forum built for MRA. What happens on it is very similar to what happens IRL. Here's a fun challenge. Find a post on the front page of this subreddit that isn't complaining about women or feminists, but is seeking a legitimate discussion on solving a specific men's issue. If and when you find that, see if the most upvoted comment within it the post is complaining about women or feminists, or if they actual talk about how one might solve the problem.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 12:31 AM
0

The reason for this though is because very often they use third parties for their violence mostly they like to rely on the state to commit their violence for them. Source and I mean actual ones, not a post to a YouTube video and your assumptions.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 12:25 AM
1

No, you don't. This subreddit spends more time complaining about women and feminists than it does talking about how to solve any MRA issue.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 12:22 AM
0

That isn't a strawman argument. The MRA movement is misrepresented because it doesn't spend any time discussing problems and finding solutions, but spending time finding new ways to blame women/feminism.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:23 PM
0

I'm pointing out something that commonly happens and is the exact reason why people see MRA as not a men's issue movement, but an anti-women/feminists movement. It happens on basically every thread. Never any discussion on how to fix the problem.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:04 PM
1

It's not far from the truth when it comes to the loudest people of MRA. Just look at this post where the topic is about being called gay for not sexually assaulting someone. Instead of talking about the problem, it's a bunch of idiots trying to hijack the post to make it anti-women and anti-feminism. Stop supporting these fucking idiots with upvotes if you want MRA to stop being viewed as an anti-feminists/womens group. Going through your own posts, majority of the one's on MRA aren't even about…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:47 PM
1

That's not demonizing boys or men. That's demonizing unacceptable behavior. If you believe that is a male thing, then that says to me that you believe cat calling and unwanted butt slaps are "boys being boys".
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:18 PM
1

But I’ve heard it said a lot when people make unreasonable demands on how boys should act. Because asking a boy not to cat call or slap a person's butt is an unreasonable demand? I'm not demonizing boys or men. I'm demonizing EVERYONE that uses "boys will be boys" to excuse bad behavior, specifically sexual misconduct. If you think that applies to only men, then that says a lot about your mentality on the subject.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:28 PM
1

Type was already fixed. Trump is also accused of forcing women to have sex. As it stands, we have a potential rapist being protected by the US government from standing trial. This isn't about feminist. This is about people saying "boys will be boys" as an excuse for sexual assault and how people within this forum are trying to claim that never happens (despite everyone knowing it does happen).
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:09 PM
1

You might as well have just said "Boys will be boys! Haha!" because you literally just wrong a paragraph trying to excuse Trump's comments on how he treats women.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 02:44 PM
1

Trump excitedly talked about sexual assaulting women and people wrote it off as "boys will be boys" and "just locker room talk." So yes, people will often write off sexual assault as "boys being boys."
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:20 AM
1

The purpose statement does NOT set the boundaries. Even then, while it says it is predominately for cases of female employment it does not limit it solely to female employment. So no, you didn't support your claim, but rather posted the law calling bullshit on your claim. Thanks for making it easier for me. For your second claim, any Canadian man can also drop off a child at an adoption centre no questions asked. Post the law again so that you prove yourself wrong again. What the fuck are you ca…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 08:27 PM
1

Child support is supposed to go towards the child. If evidence comes out that it's not, then you take it to court. Visitation isn't child support unless the child is in your care entirely. Child support is not rebranded alimony. Alimony is alimony and child support is child support. Child support spending is more restrictive.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:46 PM
1

I know for a fact that in Canada, the Party Equality Act covers everyone and is not limited to women only. Anyone can sue their employer for violating the act. Post proof of your second claim. No, Canada doesn't just let women walk away, but not men. If you have some proof, provide it. I'm sure whatever your claim is has a list of exceptions that apply equally.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:34 PM
1

The right to vote without signing up for selective service. Already answered. The right to opt out of parenthood. You can opt out of parenthood, but not your financial obligation towards a child. The right to not have your genitals mutilated as a child without consent or medical need. Religious problem, which is primarily ran by males, and needs to go. The only way this stops is to get conservatives to stop cuddling religion. The right to have forced sex on themselves from the opposite sex ackno…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 05:22 PM
1

Women have far more advantages and privileges than men. Go on, name a few.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:23 PM
1

Well from a quick look I found this, Ted Cruz being against the draft for women. That's not pro-rights for anyone. The draft should not even be a thing, for men or women. Find one that isn't about fucking over everyone that isn't affluent or well connected to get a pass. The Republican Majority for Choice (RMC) was a Republican organization... Was.... As is, not enough republicans supported it. In fact, here's what the end says: In 2018, the RMC announced that it was closing operations and its l…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:23 PM
1

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/435147-gop-maine-lawmaker-says-offering-free-pads-and-tampons-would-make-jails There, since you want to place ridiculous restrictions, despite not having similar restrictions when you challenged the other person. Now don't be a hypocrite and respond with a conservative lawmaker speaking up for women.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 01:07 PM
1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/11/14/ohio-lawmakers-are-proposing-total-ban-abortion-judges-say-those-laws-are-illegal/ Even though I asked first, there you go. Now it's your turn. In the same way you challenged that person, here's a challenge for you. Find an example of a very conservative lawmaker (e.g. McConnell, Cruz, Romney, etc) speaking up for women.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:38 PM
1

Conservative lawmakers are very much against helping women, more so than they are against helping men. In the case of women, they actively seek out ways to restrict their rights and ignore injustives, while for men, they just ignore any injustices.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:29 PM
1

Are most politicians men? Yup. Do those politicians speak up for male issues? Nope. Do those politicians speak about female issues? Yup, but typically in a negative way that goes against female issues. So if you have a problem, stop blaming women for it and start blaming male politicians. They're too focused on fucking over women and couldn't care less about helping either side.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 12:22 PM
1

No one on this planet would be surprised that you, the conned, would continue supporting the conman. We see it time and again with mega church members and their leaders. Same with cults.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:25 PM
1

Calling someone an idiot when you're the one that fell for a conman is rich.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:49 PM
1

Yes, continue listening to a self-help guru that wasn't even willing to follow his own advice. See how far that gets you in life, since we have anyway seen how the salesman selling it to you has done. Shit, for $5, I'll tell you how weak of a person you are and to 'man up', all without the benzo problem. I didn't call him a nationalist/fascist. I called you one as a response to your antifa comment here: Put on your little mask and go to your fucking pussy "antifa" rallies, moron. So put on your …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:22 AM
1

There's no way I would pay money to attend one of his self-help bullshit seminars, even if it was to ring a bell to annoy him. Better to be antifa than some MAGA nationalist/fascist moron.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 09:32 PM
1

The only thing Peterson is capable of obliterating is his heath.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 12:28 PM
-4

You have to agree that her getting out his clothes for him is ridiculous and very 50's sounding. From the way it sounds, the guy doesn't seem to do shit when he's at home.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:15 PM
1

“This isn’t meant to say that moms are ruining everything. It would be really interesting to see those biases, their beliefs, and how that reflects in their actual parenting styles.” You shouldn't just post based on an article's title.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:48 PM
1

Fathers enforce it far more. "Man up" is said by far more men than women and yes, the OP's comment history shows a person desperate to blame women for every problem experienced by men.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:34 PM
1

Don't blame women for men's problems created by men. Don't blame men for women's problems created by women. Don't be the OP.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 03:02 AM
1

The only trolling going on is from you. The alt-right are far more violent than antifa has ever been. One has literally driven a car into a crowd and killed someone, shot up a Wal-mart, and killed many more. That doesn't even include the other assaults committed, like the two in New York that were sentenced to 4 years. You live on the other side of the world. I watch it happen in real time.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 01:56 PM
1

Only need the bucket because the alt-right keeps attacking people.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 01:43 PM
1

Antifa being more aggressive than the alt-right groups in the US is a "fact" in the same way the Earth is flat is a "fact" and that the Moon landing was staged is a "fact".
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 12:39 PM
-1

These entitled women truly believe that is ok messing up with everybody's lifes in order to be heard. You seem to be under the false impression that protests shouldn't be inconvenient for others. Protests that are "convenient" do not succeed. They are ignored.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 08:55 PM
-2

If you aren't lying, go file a complaint with the police station and post a picture of the complaint here. Then I'll admit I am wrong, but until then I'm chalking it up as a lie.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:43 AM
-14

r/thishappened Can we stop upvoting obviously fake shit?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 11:25 PM
-7

Why single out feminist on this? This is a universal issue that isn't bound to feminism. Even MRA has this issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:11 PM
0

Any edit made after the first minute results in an asterisk near the time. Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users. No asterisk is next to that comment, indicating no edit after 1 minute occurred. Your accusation was made 8 minutes after that po…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:10 PM
1

Doesn't imply either. Excuses, excuses, excuses. You got caught lying and went full retard.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:51 PM
1

Where's the edit? Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users. Notice how that there is no asterisk indicating an edit in that post?
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:31 PM
1

Once again, where does it say it in this comment: Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users. The original comment that wasn't corrected for a typo or receive any edits after your reply where you make the claim.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:30 PM
1

You stupid fuck. You claimed this comment: Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users. Said that I believe you support rape. Quote the comment that supports you or fuck off.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:15 PM
1

Are you intentionally being dense or are you really this fucking stupid? The first comment that you replied to me claimed I said you supported rape did not contain a typo. I'm still asking you to quote the part of that comment. For the third fucking time, where the fuck do I claim you support rape in this comment. Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% popu…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:13 PM
1

No, you quoted a reply to your claim where I made an obvious typo. Quote the part of the original comment where you first made the claim. Again, here's the full comment top make your life easier. Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users. Quote th…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:01 PM
1

There wasn't a typo in the comment that you initially claimed I said you supported rape. Either quote it or edit your comments to admit you lied.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:22 PM
1

Come on now. Quote the part of that comment that supports your claim.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:16 PM
1

*didn't. Obvious typo which was a response to your original claim. Quote the exact pay of the comment where you replied with the following that supports your claim. I am not MGTOW user and love how you assumed that i said that men should rape women xD Here's the full text to make life easy. Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to …
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:00 PM
1

Quote exactly where I said it. You're supportive comments in the MGTOW sub aren't helping you. Everyone can view your history until you decide to start deleting the comments.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:11 PM
1

I didn't say that you believe men should rape women. What I said is that many users here, especially those from MGTOW and incel, believe women always lie about being raped and that they're really just sluts. Really says a lot about you though that you managed to pull "men should rape women" out of your ass when reading the comment. PS, your comment history shows many comments in MGTOW. All supportive of them idiotic beliefs.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:53 AM
1

Sounds a lot like the MGTOW, incels, and many users on MRA who claim the wage gap has never existed, all women lie about rape and are actually sluts, and should be rendered to 10% population. All you have to do is spot the users that post in the anti-feminism forums to find the toxic MRA users.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:30 AM
-2

I am a firm believer that females are the cause of double standards. That's the dumbest fucking thing I have read in a while and you should seek some therapy.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 06:27 PM
2

If you find watching men doing the right thing against a bunch of assholes offensive, then you should talk to a therapist. That is not normal.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:37 AM
2

I tried courtesy and it didn't work. There is a reason why so many people on this sub dislike that commercial and its because they think being an asshole is an honorable trait to have.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:58 PM
2

Being against harassment, bullying, and fighting is toxic masculinity and you're claiming that the commercial is really praising those attributes? You're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:38 PM
2

I am male and have a brother 8 yrs my senior. I know full well the difference between wrestling for fun and full on bullying and fighting. Anyone that thinks the commercial showed playful fighting, they're a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:19 PM
2

If you believe that, then by default believe MRA and "black knights" accept what I said mockingly as being true. In other words, you'd be brainless.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:13 PM
2

No one with a brain would actual mean it or mean what you said either. Mine was obviously to mock your comment, so what was your reason?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:18 PM
2

Men saints women bad upvotes to the left.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:03 PM
2

Clearly you're a lunatic if you think they were showing an example of play wrestling in the commercial.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:30 PM
1

Emasculated son vs future school shooter or suicide victim son.... I'll take the emasculated one over your future.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:23 AM
1

If you call that play wrestling, I feel bad for any unfortunate kid you have or will have.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:03 AM
1

Because all those men that were standing up to the assholes were clearly rapists, misogynists, racists, etc. in disguise right?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:41 PM
-2

Women standing up against harassment, bullying, and fighting between girls? It would be viewed very positively as it promotes good traits instead claiming "girls will be girls" to ignore the problems.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 09:18 PM
-7

Think about it. You dislike a commercial showing men being good people and fathers by stopping harassment, bullying, and fighting. Instead, you are arguing those are NOT good traits for men to show. That's illogical.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 08:36 PM
1

There is no evidence that the commercial hurt them. Sad that a good commercial showing men standing up to toxic behavior gets shit on by people who believe the "boys will be boys" mentality is good.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:57 PM
1

Because feminism is doing that. However in the same breath, feminists say they are for equality and men's right's movement has no reason for existing. Exactly. The issue with the second part is that you're confusing support with activism. They support equality issues, but being upset because they aren't acting as full on activist is ridiculous. They have their own issues and telling them to be MRA activist is stretching their resources thin. So instead of blaming MRAs for not putting women's iss…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:52 PM
1

That's your ideology speaking, considering women also voted for the abortion bill in alabama, if that is what you were referring to. Majority of women polled in those places oppose the abortion bills. Also, not every congressman is a conservative. In the states where those bills are being passed, majority of them are conservative. The reason why selective service isn't an issue is because no one is pressuring them, which highlights the need for men's rights. This discussion isn't about the need …
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:57 PM
1

They have as much power to demand change, but we know from their voting records that the male conservatives in power don't actual give a shit about women. Selective Service is still a problem created by men and being protected by men.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:16 AM
0

It's sexism created by men to be against men! Blame men for that problem instead of trying to pass the blame to feminist. They aren't the ones preventing a bill from being passed that removes selective service. They aren't the ones making excuses. That's you. Funny that you think it's feminism responsibility to care about EVERY issue, but you've got no problem with MRA only caring about men. It's honestly astounding the mental gymnastics you anti-feminist will perform to find a reason to blame f…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:41 AM
0

Why should it be a critical issue for feminism? They aren't the ones pushing to maintain it. They aren't the ones that pushed to make it law. Men made a sexist law that hurts men and men are the ones that continue arguing in favor of keeping it. It's not a battle for women just like free sanitary products for female inmates and removing the hurdles of buying birth control isn't really a MRA issue. MRA aren't out there fighting those fights and you're not out there complaining that it isn't. You …
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:46 AM
0

What does that have to do with OP's comment? Why do you have to run a background check and dredge up any shit you can instead of simply addressing his comment? I addressed their original comment. They decided to to continue on with their goal of turning the thread into being anti-feminism for absolute no reason. I bring up their post history because those users who actively post in places like anti-feminism and MGTOW are not coming on to this sub acting in good faith. Their goal isn't to help me…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:26 AM
1

Ratios mean nothing without numbers per ratio. What the fuck does that even mean? Having men in charge built civilization. Look up matriarchies and see how far they got past mud huts (they don't). No scientific evidence of that, but not surprisingly you would try to make up sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:14 PM
1

No, I mean of adult humans in the USA, a little over 52% are women. You are correct that the rest of the difference comes from disenfranchised felons. US demographics are almost dead on 50/50 from 15 to 64 years of age. Ages 15-24 is 1.05 m/f, 25-54 is 1.0 m/f, and 55-64 is 0.93 m/f. Yeah, I'm so pissed off that we have civilization. Ridiculous comment that doesn't even fit the context. Unless you of course have the sexist ideology that women are destroying civilization today by voting. Ahh, tro…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:38 PM
1

Of those who can vote in the USA, 56% are women. So you are claiming that women have magically made it harder for men to sign up to vote? And that it has nothing to do with men either not registering or having lost it for committing a crime? And, yes, what women have done with their majority control of government is their fault. And you still won't blame men for what they have done with their majority control of the government for a MUCH longer period in history. Leave the bullshit spreading in …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:46 PM
-2

Answering to only 44% men. FTFY, since once again, this is not the fault of women. This is the fault of men choosing not to vote and not voice their concerns about male issues (that don't involve trying to hurt non-men).
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:08 PM
0

Men have far more power to help men as we're the ones that created the problem to begin with. You're not here to fight for men, you're here to spread anti-women and anti-feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:40 AM
-3

It doesn't surprise me in the least that you post in that idiotic MGTOW sub. You would rather blame women for not fixing a problem men control.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:38 AM
-7

I didn't say you blamed them for the draft. What you are doing is you are blaming feminist for not fixing the problem. Instead of blaming the actual people that could fix the problem, the men in congress who make up the majority, you instead pick a totally irrelevant group. You're far more of a problem for MRA than feminist are, because you have literally no idea where to direct the blame for not fixing the problem. Take your ignorant antifeminist bullshit that has nothing to do with this sub ba…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:49 AM
1

And we men are the ones who built it into law this way and make up the majority of congress. Blaming women when they don't have the power to fix a problem create by men and still preserved by men is retarded.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:10 AM
-14

I love how you're stupidly blaming feminism for this when men create the selective service law and men still make up the majority of congress. Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:09 AM
1

Remember, majority of the people in congress are men and they have the power the change this law. They are the ones to attack.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 02:08 AM
1

Going back to the Gillette commercial, too many people were on here saying "boys will be boys" and "man up" are acceptable.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:02 AM
4

Replace the word MEN with the word FEMINIST or LIBERAL and a lot of people here wouldn't consider it hate. PS: Fuck Candace Owens.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 09:28 PM
3

You can't say she immediately started hitting him in the nuts, because we have no idea how much context is being left out. For all we know, she could have asked before the video started.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/19 03:01 AM
1

You attacked my education first, in an error ridden post. That shows both your lack of ability to refute my points and that your education is shit.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:49 PM
1

You're trying to arguing that a vasectomy is equivalent to tube tying. That's a moronic stance to take.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 01:45 PM
1

Providing women the option to abort is being a responsible adult. Taking that ability away is irresponsible.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:34 PM
1

So their financial situation, work/education situation, age, or other personal reasons you chalk up to being "lazy"? You want multiple people to suffer over an easily corrected situation?
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:00 PM
1

Without both signatures then it should never be allowed to happen. So in the case of rape, incest, or the doctor warns them of a high risk of health issue/death, you want to force the lady to give birth unless they can get the father to sign off on the abortion as well. What a fucking sick mentality you have. It's purely about the power to control another person for you.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 12:46 PM
1

The non-custodial parent pays child support to the custodial parent. Gender is not the factor.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:45 PM
1

So then he gets put to death if she dies at work as well?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:46 PM
0

So you're okay with psychological manipulation?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:01 PM
1

You're changing my comments because you want to be dishonest in the discussion. It would be like me changing your comment to say you actually think that us anti-women's rights pro life men are only pro birth life because they we are greedy men wanting to control womens bodies.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:54 PM
1

I'm not claiming every act should be weighed the same. In this case, the child should be removed from the mother's care and the father given a choice to either support or give up for adoption. The mother should have her custodial rights removed, but still pay the financial burden. Also, don't forget that in Alabama and other places, the father of a child born from rape has parental rights.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:39 PM
1

Because not every person who supports MRA has to support all the stupid bullshit people come in here spewing.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:33 PM
1

You are the one the wrong here. We can't beleive tou hold such bullshit as truth. The Education system worked very well on you If you're going to insult someone's education, try to use property grammar and spelling yourself. Not a single one of these three sentences is error free.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:33 PM
2

You're a moron of you think men have all the risk after pregnancy. A financial risk does not compare to a post-birth health and financial risks.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:29 PM
1

About as stupid of a comment as the republican that said "women have a way of shutting it down."
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:28 PM
1

Don't strike out my words and then ask me to explain yours. I said: That 1% or even 0.1% matters health convenience matters more than the 100% convenience, people here want. Not That 1% or even 0.1% matters health convenience matters more than the 100% convenience life, people here want. Changing a person's comment is literally arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:24 PM
1

We have rights to our own bodies. You want to remove that right from women.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:22 PM
2

You're a moron of you believe being tubes tied is reversible like a vasectomy. Not to mention, go ask the women's sub how easy that procedure is to get. They will tell you horror stories about doctors refusing to do the procedure because the doctor believes the woman will regret it. It's sad how you are trying to argue the woman isn't also paying for the mistake, physically, mentally, and financially.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:18 PM
1

And 100% of the reason for this thread is based on convenience. That 1% or even 0.1% matters health convenience matters more than the 100% financial convenience people here want.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:06 PM
2

It's not r/conservative, but it sure as hell as been pushed into conservative right wing territory.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:04 PM
1

Health rights > parental rights.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:03 PM
1

The inherent right not to potentially die ranks higher than your right to force a birth.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:48 PM
2

Because not everyone that supports MRA has to support the stupid shit like forced births.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:30 PM
1

Heritage Foundation OMFG, lol. I should have known you were taking the piss with me.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:58 AM
1

Women are let off with financial duties, they are asked to pay less. No they aren't and that all depends on the court. They also get to decide on abortion, which is fine, but then men are expected to pay for 18 years of a childs life that he didn't even necessarily want. Because one has far more consequences than the other, and your mistake should not be paid by society. You then have individuals like you, who underline men around the world and make it seem like their lives are handy dandy becau…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:53 AM
3

I can't believe people are upvoting that load of bullshit. Is this sub full of children that honestly believe father's aren't awarded financial support when their the primary caregiver? https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/what-should-fathers-do-to-get-child-support-from-mothers-37296
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:43 AM
1

There will never be equality, because it is physically not possible for pregnancy to have equality.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:40 AM
1

https://www.birthinjuryguide.org/birth-injury/mothers/ If you had paid attention in sex ed, you would have learned this back then. Assuming you are older than 14 yrs old.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:37 AM
-11

Uhm yeah, if you mean "forcing" as in tying someone up in a cage. You're not forcing someone by telling them you really want a baby. Except you are arguing to strip away abortion rights, which is effectively trapping a person. Nah it's still about having a future son or daughter. It is much more serious than that. No, it's more about control. You can easily have children with another person that is more willing without putting someone else's life at risk. It's not about forcing anyone. Arguing w…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:35 AM
1

Because this fucking threat started out about money and whether a man should be able to forego the financial responsibility. You all are trying to ignore the mental and physical health problems that are tied to being pregnant and acting like financial issues alone are equivalent to financial and health issues.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:31 AM
0

I never tried to hide my colors. A financial risk is not equivalent to a health and financial risk.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:29 AM
2

You do realize that you are biased as well, right? The difference is, I'm biased towards the woman's right and you're biased against woman's right to choosing their own health risks.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:28 AM
1

That's just a poor way of phrasing it. This isn't shits and giggles for the man and a bit of fun, it's his future child! If you're forcing a person to give birth, it's for your benefit, not anyone elses. So yes, that is effectively for "shits and giggles" as we have no permanent health risk involved in the pregnancy process. I'm pro-life. Who are you even arguing against? And why? You're pro-birth. Someone that is pro-life would gladly assume the same health risk.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:24 AM
1

Your point is that you believe women are inferior species designed to reproduce for a man's benefit and when a man chooses. That's a pretty fucked up belief. The only time you ought have right to kill another human being is when they threaten your own survival. Glad we agree, but apparently you don't think giving birth is a threat to a woman's survival.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:22 AM
1

If you think after 9 months women no longer have health issues related to pregnancy, you're a fucking idiot. It's permanent damage to the body and they have the same fucking 18 year responsibility.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:18 AM
1

Men pay child support because the burden shouldn't be placed on the rest of society for their mistake. Woman pay child support because the burden shouldn't be placed on the rest of society for their mistake.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:16 AM
1

You'd rather a woman dies giving birth to an accident than have a vasectomy that practically guarantees that accident doesn't happen?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:14 AM
-15

Women do pay child support when they lose custody and if they fail to pay, they are penalized as well.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:11 AM
1

Our financial problems does NOT compare to their health and financial problems.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:10 AM
1

Are you seriously going to argue that a man's financial issues are more important than woman's health and financial issues?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:09 AM
1

Every human being has an intrinsic right to life. Except you don't believe a woman has that same right. You are wanting to force them to give up their chance of life to satisfy your own greed. You don't get execute a person because they're inconvenient for you. Except that you want to potentially execute a person for your own greed. And at the point of conception, new DNA form is created. New life is created. New life that you ought not be the judge, jury, and executioner for. Parasites are livi…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:08 AM
1

Why the comparison? Because one side is wanting to force another side to take on far more risk. Are we to disregard what happens to men because women are put in far more risk when it comes to pregnancy? Yes, because we aren't the ones risking our health, our life. There's a massive imbalance in the risk, which is why we give the person with more risk the authority. I don't get to force you to undergo a medical procedure, so it makes no sense why we should be allowed to force a woman to undergo o…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:00 AM
1

Majority of them are and even with a vasectomy, we still produce sperm. It does not prevent us from having a child.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:55 AM
-2

Our mental health is barely put at risk. Not even a fraction of the chemical and physical health changes women experience. Like I said in other places. Lets enact an "eye for an eye" law. Every health problem a woman is forced to have to give birth, the man is subjected to the same. From depression to death. Let us see who truly want to take the same risks instead of just wanting to control others and be rewarded.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:50 AM
1

hysterectomy Not reversible like a vasectomy and when the fuck did men start giving birth and having their health put at risk to do so?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:48 AM
1

Actually we do own what is growing in our body. If there's a parasite inside my body, I get to choose whether it gets removed. You don't, my parents don't, my siblings don't, the local churches don't, the local politicians don't, etc. If you want to force a woman to give birth, then any health issue the woman experiences, you should be forced to experience an equivalent amount. That means if she dies, you die. If she's depressed, we force you to be depressed. I guarantee you won't take on that s…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:47 AM
-25

Women have more reproductive rights because it is happening inside their body, not the man. The man has zero risk involved in the pregnancy. No health issues, no risk of death.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:44 AM
1

How is the woman controlling what happens in the man's body? Is the man's health at risk by being pregnant?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:43 AM
1

So let us enact a new law. Any physical damage caused to the lady by being forced to give birth to an unwanted pregnancy, the man is subjected to an equivalent amount. If the pregnancy leads to death, the man is put to death as well. I'm 100% sure you would change your tune with that sort of law. You want the reward, but with none of the risk.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:38 AM
1

Shaming a lady who is the one that would be forced to carry it to term, risking her own life in the process just so he can have his enjoyment is being the bigger cunt.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:32 AM
1

It's not a baby until it can live outside the body. Until then, it's equivalent to a parasite.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:28 AM
-38

Simple fix: Get a vasectomy and stop acting like you own what happens inside of a woman's body. The point of child support is to avoid forcing that burden on society. You fuck up, you pay. Exactly how one would expect society to operate.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:24 AM
1

You are proving my point that you won't find anything where she claims the model was built from feminism rather than her sociology background. "Patriarchal violence" are your words, not hers.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:44 AM
1

Find a single article where she describes herself as a feminist and having created the Duluth Model because of her feminist beliefs, because that is what you are claiming.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:51 AM
-1

LMAO you really spent all that time digging through my post history just to prove a few internet strangers wrong? I’m honestly flattered lol. All I did was scroll down and take about 1 minute to look at a comment. It's not like your account is years old and full of comments. I'm sure you have multiple accounts as do a lot of posters. I'm not going to argue against whatever happened to you, since I don't know if it's real or not. However, here's what I will say. You blame Linden and Dunham, but t…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:49 AM
1

She joined the movement against domestic violence against women, which happened to be started by feminists. There were a lot of feminist movements and not everyone that joined the movements are considered feminists. If MRA started a movement for domestic violence against men, it would not mean that the people who join that movement are joining MRA. People who join the pro-choice movement don't automatically join the feminist movement when the pro-choice movement was started by feminists. Liberal…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:27 AM
0

The program was born from a sociologist studying battered women. Some feminist supported it, but it wasn't born from feminism as you are claiming.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:13 AM
1

https://youtu.be/JymN5yu-K_o First, lets be clear as the uploader directly states "CLARIFYING, since it's surprising how people can't interprete the vid: This video doesn't imply that feminists kept the male BC pill from getting to the market. " Second, he's the only one that has made that claim and it hasn't been backed by anyone else. Third, it was found that the pill he was pushing actually had a high rate of permanent infertility. If you Google anything regarding feminism and male contracept…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:11 AM
-2

The Duluth Model wasn't created by feminists, but from a sociologist doing an experiment into battered women. Most people, including feminists, recognize that it doesn't account for all domestic violence.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:42 AM
-2

These are comments on the internet, not a concerted MRA "campaign against women's rights". Congratulations, you just argued against why your issues with feminism are ridiculous. There's no concerted feminist agenda to "campaign against men's rights", but you sure as hell falsely believe it based on internet comments.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:24 AM
1

Yes. Could all be prevented by the woman taking precaution, too. Birth control is only so effective. If takes multiple forms of protection to reduce the chance to practically zero. And since women will no longer be able to control men's bodies, there will be no further reason for feminists to fight against technologies that would expand contraceptive options for men (e.g., gossypol, RISUG/vasalgel), some of which may also improve or expand contraceptive options for women. Feminists aren't trying…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:46 AM
0

But like where are the examples of us doing so? A lot of people here campaign against abortion. Others have argued against female bosses by claiming they're being hired based on gender quotas. Others have argued that women should keep quiet about sexual assault or harassment because some male bosses are not claiming they are scared to mentor women. Others have argued that feminism should be treated as a hate group. Here, let me quote someone who is against a woman's right to choose what happens …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:37 AM
1

And it's terrible that some women would be so selfish and irresponsible as to force a child into existence under those circumstances So how are you going to justify anti-abortion laws? And then are you really going to force a woman to have an abortion at the same time? You do realize this could all be prevented by the man taking precaution, right? Wear condoms with a spermicide to significantly reduce the chance or get a vasectomy to almost eliminate the chance. we cannot hold the position that …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:16 AM
-6

When you have a political/cultural movement that fundamentally calls for stripping men of basic civil rights, than than crtiticism of that movement (with evidence to back it up) is absolutely justified. So then you're arguing that criticism of MRA is absolutely justified since so many of the people here are calling for stripping basic civil rights from women.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:10 AM
-4

Giving the option to opt out places the burden on society and punishes the child. We know how enthusiastic one side of the political aisle is with respect to destroying social services to see how putting the burden on society isn't going to work.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:17 PM
1

Yes they can. Many places allow personal testing, and most states and countries one simply has to petition the court and most of the time it's granted. In France for instance, one can petition the court, but personal tests are illegal.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:05 PM
-5

Complaining about third wave or any wave of feminism is ridiculous. They all have legitimate reasons for starting and persisting. Third wave partly started because of the mistreatment of Anita Hill and with Kavanaugh's confirmation, we saw once again why their concerns shouldn't be ignored or mocked. Yes, some people abuse the ideas for their own gain, but that shouldn't discount majority of the movement. It's like discounting MRA's reason for existing because some of the followers are misogynis…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:43 PM
-3

No, you don't.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:30 PM
4

Reminder that this isn't a sub about "anti-feminism", but about MRA. If your goal is simply to attack them, go to that sub instead.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 05:47 PM
-1

Since it's a topic about creepy bosses and people are attacking AOC for her comment, Trump is fair game for his prior actions and comments. You can't sit there and bitch about "men feel(ing) uncomfortable about mentoring women" when you vote in a person with a history of doing just that to the highest public position in the government and one of the most powerful in the world.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 12:25 PM
-1

What's pathetic is that you support a person that openly and proudly talked about creeping on women... Many of them being underage. Seems like you've got no problem with bosses acting creepy and would rather have their victims be quiet instead.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:56 AM
-4

And then you have women fearing their male bosses and never speak up if they are treated unfairly because they could be fired. AOC isn't saying "seriously retarded stuff." She has her bias, just as you have your bias that favors an openly bigoted criminal president. Remember this and ask yourself why women might find another creepy: “Before a show, I’ll go backstage and everyone’s getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the ow…
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:38 AM
-2

And it's not because the men surveyed don't lie about this either... Clearly no one has a reason to lie.... People blaming feminism here are retarded. They aren't out there systematically lying to further themselves. Some people will lie to directly hurt others, but most do not. This isn't the "anti-feminism sub". Stop pissing all over them and get back to discussing how to fix issues that are real problems, like family courts and getting rid of selective service sign up requirements.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:24 AM
1

An honest cop doing his job has absolutely no reason to not want to wear a body cam. If the cop does their job in the right way, a body cam will only help them prove this. Except that we have seen many police officers claim the body cam hampers their ability to perform their job, because their argument is that it prevents them from using their discretion on when to cite or arrest. False sexual assault accusations on the other hand have destroyed the lives and careers of innocent men Far fewer li…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:43 PM
-1

A cop doing his job the way he should do his job has no reason to fear societal repercussions. Sure they do, especially now since people have started looking at their actions under a microscope thanks to more places requiring body cameras. Would you want to pay an officer that said either they patrol with no body cam or don't patrol at all?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:21 AM
-1

Getting shot in the line of duty ≠ having your life and career ruined by a false allegation. You are intentionally ignoring the point of the analogy. If a person cannot do their job because of a hypothetical situation, they should not be employed in that job. If all the police officers only sat in their office and waited until after the crime had ended to investigate, would you want to pay them a full salary for doing a fraction of their job's duties? But for reasons I can't comprehend, everythi…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:37 AM
0

You're literally trying to create a bigger double standard.... Once again, it's not the employees fault the boss is failing to do their job because if a hypothetical situation. Like I said, this is no different than a police officer refusing to do their job and wanting to still be paid because they might get shot. At the end of the day, either they do their job or they should quit.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:11 AM
0

There is no monumental difference between one gender or the other making a false accusation. Both are equally bad. You are arguing its the woman's fault a boss feels they can't do their job over a hypothetical. Are you seriously arguing that it would be better if women didn't report sexual harassment because an extremely small number of them abuse the system, which might lead to bosses feeling uncomfortable at doing their job?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:56 AM
0

If you put a woman in the same hypothetical situation, it's guaranteed you would argue the compete opposite you are arguing right now.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:32 AM
0

For a lot of men? It's a fraction of a fraction precent. You don't seem to understand that hypotheticals should not prevent a person from doing their job. If you would tell a woman to suck it up or quit if they told you they can't work for their boss because the boss might harass them, then the same argument holds true for a boss. If a police officer refused to do their job because they were scared they would get shot, wouldn't you have an issue with them keeping their job?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:52 AM
-5

If you cannot do your job because of a hypothetical, that's a personal problem. That's not a problem intentionally being created by other people. Yes, some people do falsely accuse others of stuff. However, the issue being discussed here is over a hypothetical and you're claiming that's equivalent to an actual event. I'll put it this way. You would NEVER tell a woman that it's okay to fear their boss because the boss is male. You would tell them the fear is unfounded, childish, and sexist.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:17 AM
-7

That's not even remotely the same. One is a personal issue and the other is a personal intentional creating issues with another person. Your analogy is as stupid as claiming someone being an introvert is equivalent to someone distrusting others after being harassed. It's illogical.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:59 AM
-7

If the person is unwilling to mentor, then they are failing to do the job they were hired for and should resign. There's more than enough people in this world willing to step forward and preform.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:51 PM
1

If you are unable to do the job you were hired to do for your own personal reasons, then quit. Don't drag down and punish the people you are supposed to manage.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:53 AM
1

If you are unable to do the job you were hired to do for your own personal reasons, then quit. Don't drag down and punish the people you are supposed to manage.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:50 AM
1

If you are unable to do the job you were hired to do for your own personal reasons, then quit. Don't drag down and punish the people you are supposed to manage.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:49 AM
1

If you are unable to do the job you were hired to do for your own personal reasons, then quit. Don't drag down and punish the people you are supposed to manage.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:48 AM
1

If you are unable to do the job you were hired to do for your own personal reasons, then quit. Don't drag down and punish the people you are supposed to manage.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:47 AM
1

If you cannot do the job you're hired to do, then you need to quit that job at you have become unqualified.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:44 AM
2

Imagine my comment is the same then. Trumptards need to stop wasting their breath.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:32 PM
3

I'm not the one that brought it up. I'm just the one that threw it back at the person. What is really sad is that you aren't calling out JohnChrissy for being the one that made the original pro-death comment.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 11:51 AM
–

I'd rather see the Trumptards over in T_D stop wasting oxygen first. It's honestly amazing that those idiots have the brain capacity to remember how to breath.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:41 AM
1

Better, clearer, repeatable measurements are the answer. Obviously scientists strive for better, clearer, and repeatable measurements. However, when we have a good model with very specific rules, and within a lot of noise we find data that fits 95% of what was predicted, that's exciting. These results are quite clear. The gravitational wave was quite clear. Detecting the Higgs boson was quite clear. Evolution and climate change are both quite clearly happening. People still want to discredit all…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:15 PM
1

It's like Mars, now we have pictures from the surface. All those YouTube videos about finding alien lifeforms, statues of people, machine parts, and so on. And, the examples they show do look convincing. Scientist were not theorizing statues of people or machine parts on Mars. Those theories are more from non-scientists looking at images and saying "Wow, doesn't that look like a human face? That can't be random!" The difference between a scientists and a non-scientists is that the former theoriz…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:42 PM
3

That is exactly how it is has to be done. You need a theoretical model of what the data should look like so that you can comb through the noise to see if the phenomena exist. Imagine searching through piles of random looking rocks to find the only brick. If you didn't have some theoretical idea of what a brick looks likes, you would never find it.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:14 PM
1

^ As anyone can see, beating a misogynist that wants complete control over a woman and then wants additional control over whether they pay for a child they have create is an incredibly easy feat. Just point out how they want to force women into giving birth, without a damn for the woman's health or ability to care for themselves post-birth. You want all the rights and none of the responsibility for a fuck up you participated in, but only have a financial consequence verses the woman's health and…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 10:28 PM
1

Admit that you honestly don't give a fuck and you simply want full control over a woman's life.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:58 PM
1

No, it's not even comparable. The life of the woman matters way the fuck more than a fetus when it's in her. One it's born, it shouldn't be a burden on society because you decided you didn't want to pay for your mistake. If don't want the risk of a child, get a vasectomy. Easy solution to your problem and it is better for the rest of us as well.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:34 PM
0

A parasite is an organism that lives on or in a host organism and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. It 100% fits that definition. What's sickening is that you believe you have rights over a woman's body.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:23 PM
1

It's a parasite until it is wanted and extracted from the body. Given that the parasite can easily kill the host, the host gets to dictate what happens within her body. Not you.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:12 PM
1

When it's inside her and attached to her, it's her body.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:00 PM
-3

Because after the birth, it's not her body anymore. It's their body until it comes out. Then it's mutual responsibility. Don't like it? Don't fuck her.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:22 PM
-12

Those were the top 16 women, which means all the executive members are male.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:14 AM
1

How is this PPD? She hung up on them...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/19 02:23 PM
6

This isn't a case of PPD. If there was no draft and women tried to force a male only draft and the judge said no, then it would be PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/19 12:30 AM
3

Seems like we have reached a different peak. One where people believe whatever bullshit they see on the internet and then blame feminism. Also, the book wasn't written by a woman or a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:15 AM
-1

The floor routine is assuming the media is being sympathetic because the picture they have doesn't show her covered in blood and burning the flag.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 07:28 PM
3

That's called parenting and has nothing to do with masculinity, femininity, or other.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:24 PM
-4

It's a neutral looking picture. You're literally arguing that news stories should feature pictures meant to manipulate the reader. You're literally arguing for using propaganda tactics. How the fuck is using Trump's name trying to garner sympathy when it's his administration saying no? Whose name would you rather them put? What they are doing is called accurate reporting. I'm not saying they are outright sympathetic... Expect that is exactly what you said in the title. Not here to argue left vs …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 05:25 PM
-3

Who the fuck cares what the picture looks like of the text doesn't paint her in a nice way? The story matters and the picture should be neutral. Stop trying to push Fox News level of entertainment where they intentionally only use shitty pictures of people they don't like and good pictures of people they do. The article literally mentions what is happening. Trump admin says no on her returning while her lawyer says they can't because she's a citizen. This doesn't paint either side bad or good. G…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 05:13 PM
-7

At what point did it: A) show sympathy for her? B) Buzzfeed count as mainstream media? The answer is neither.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 04:55 PM
0

You've got the sexism part, but it's not feminisms fault. That shit has been around for centuries, long before the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:22 AM
-6

This isn't PPD. This is two Redditors that belong on r/iamverysmart.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/19 12:28 AM
0

I don't invest too much into debating bigots and victim blamers. It's too hard tell when it's a troll or an idiot, with neither being worth the effort.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:29 PM
1

A troll would spend their time blaming everyone other than the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:29 PM
-1

It's very telling how you only attack the victims and the men that did the right thing in the commercial, while claiming the one's in the wrong are the true victims. A guy stops his friend from being an asshole and you find a way to blame everyone except the asshole. Keep it up. Your disservice to men does not go unnoticed. Your victim blaming does not go unnoticed.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:11 PM
0

Cat calling is an issue and it's clear in the video what is happening. Keep up the victim blaming and bigotry. Really helping by saying men are never wrong and therefore cannot be victims either. Weird that you believe the ones starting fights and harassing others are the victims. Not the kids being beaten up, the ones being talked down on, or the way that literally sat in front of the senate to describe his experience.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:57 PM
1

If you believe cat calling and then trying to follow a woman is acceptable, you're a moron.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:48 PM
-4

The point of the Gillette ad was not even close to that. It was showcasing men stepping up to other men. It showed men being good fathers. It showed men are victims too. Except to you. You seem to believe none of those things are masculine. You want to blame women for every problem and watch commercials with firefighters and soldiers looking cool. Want to help men? Stop attacking them when they're shown as victims. By the way, in response to your other reply, cat calling is NOT an excusable way …
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:40 PM
-8

Whoops, deleted when I was trying to edit. Anyways, keep up the victim the blaming. It's really helping male victims of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and bullying.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:26 PM
1

And they you go blaming men for being victims. Nice job.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:20 PM
1

Except for when people on here shit all over him and the Gillette commercial.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:01 PM
-1

You ignored everything that was said and went straight into a politically charged sexist rant. Congrats on being so ignorant. I'm sure you're proud, given how often you resort to racism and sexism in your comment history. You seem to have nothing nice to say.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:57 PM
-3

The ad showed off men doing the right thing by stopping harassment, stopping bullies, standing up for themselves and others, and being a good father. So much of the behavior in the ad is seen by people. I've seen and have been at one point that little kid being bullied on the ground while the fathers said "boys so be boys". People here want to ignore the problems. The response ad created by the watch company is a good example of ignoring the problems. They listed some issues and then did exactly…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:09 PM
-8

The commercial didn't attack its customers, unless you believe it's customers are guilty of ignoring bullying. Cheaper alternatives have done more than this commercial ever could do. The thing that upsets me though is that this sub claims it supports the male victims of sexual harassment and assault, but many users attacked Terry Crews over the clip of him being used by Gillette. This sub seems to have stopped being about helping men and more about attacking everyone else.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:00 AM
3

The truth is that no one would call it toxic masculinity. They would call him being an asshole.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:25 PM
1

Numbers… which obviously show male issues And once again, numbers mean NOTHING unless you inform people how they can help or how they can be provided help. It doesn't take some big old political statement to realize ignoring physical abuse isn't okay, nor does it take some big message to know sexual harassment isn't okay. The same could be said about the statistics in this commercial. Especially one that ignores providing different ways to help. Men's issues aren't given the light of day. You do…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:32 PM
0

Yet again, it brought up true male issues moody take about to spark discussion. No, it posted a few numbers and then outright ignored providing ways we can help. Instead it focused on glamorizing certain occupations. We know the suicide rate, occupation death rate, and homeless rate for men is high. So where the fuck in the commercial do they tell you how you can help? It doesn't and that is why it is a poorly constructed commercial. AKA why so many men die by their jobs, over selflessness and g…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:16 PM
-1

There was no positive message in this response commercial. It posted a few numbers, showed a few faces, and then ignored the problem by moving quickly on to hero job worshiping and smiling faces. It provides not a single solution or recommendation of where to provide support. It's a societal issue, that everyone needs to address. And yet this ad as well points to societal issues that should be addressed. However, at no point does it give anyone a hint at how to start addressing the problems. You…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:07 PM
0

It did literally nothing to promote positive action. All it did was say "here's a bit of depressing news and... CHECK IT OUT! Firefighters! Military! Ohh! Ahhh!" No solutions to the problems it first mentioned. It straight up fucking ignored the problems by not showing anyone helping. Exactly the opposite of what the Gillette commercial did. It didn't speak honestly of the issues, just mentioned very briefly of their existence before moving on to "hero job worshipping".
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:01 PM
-5

This ad ignored issues that men often decline to handle because it would rather paint all men as perfect. It's just another piece shitty beer or truck commercial that refuses to show reality. Showing homeless men and mentioning suicide/death rates does nothing. They didn't bother mentioning WHY so many are homeless or dying or show how anyone could help. It pulls the same old shit of making you feel sympathetic and then oh hey, a firefighter! Back to forgetting the problems exist.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:05 PM
-8

What is a man? One that stands up against sexual harassment, sexual assault, talking down, bullying, and fighting. One that boosts their child's confidence. So... basically what the Gillette commercial promoted. We don't need another bullshit commercial that ignores reality and views life through rose-colored glasses. Fuck all those truck commercials, beer commercials, and this shitty watch commercial that act like the only real men are firefighters, police officers, and military.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:00 AM
1

And you might be best covering your eyes and ears if seeing and hearing the realities of life offends you.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:34 PM
0

So now you're pointing to the Britain. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/girlguiding-feminism-girls-women-britain-uk/ This one says it is closer to US numbers for younger women and is more recent (2018 vs 2016). Here's one from 2015 with higher numbers for Britain as well: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nearly-1-in-5-people-in-the-uk-think-being-called-a-feminist-is-an-insult-a6728446.html If you include men, it does drop quite a bit lower, but it's primarily a women's mo…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:33 PM
-1

https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/401804-poll-less-than-half-of-female-millennials-identify-as-feminists Not sure where you got your 14% from, but that's not in the US. You do act like you are of the belief that it is okay to generalize when it is against a group you dislike.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:21 PM
-4

But it has been acceptable. We've constantly lived with the "boys will be boys" mentality and we have a President that has been allowed to get away with it because "that's just who he is."
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:19 PM
-1

I don't recall a groping scene, so I might be wrong on that one, but I do know there was no rape scene. I suspect that if there was a groping scene, you decided it was best to ignore the follow up scene where another guy steps in and stops it, right? Do you believe that feminists are a problem? If so, how does that not make you a hypocrite for doing the same generalizing?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:01 PM
-1

No, you're just wasting energy trying to find ways to shift the blame. That ad must've spoke to you on a spiritual level. Not really. It seemed to speak to a lot of people that believe cat calling, harassment, and bullying are masculine traits though.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:53 PM
-2

Yet you're putting it up on the same pedestal as rape and molestation. Do either of these happen in the commercial? No. They don't, so fuck off with trying to put words in my mouth. YOU are the one trying to place the actions of the commercial on the same pedestal by using the black community as your weapon.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:50 PM
-6

Teachers do intervene and with the way schools work, it ultimately ends up with the principal determining what should be done. You're trying to find a way to blame women instead of blaming the bully or the parents of the bully.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:49 PM
-5

Disagreeing with you is not trolling. Believing that part of MRA is to calling other men out for their bad behavior is not trolling.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:47 PM
-3

"Boys will be boys" is a common saying to excuse childhood bullying and cat calling. Also, there's a world of difference between stealing cars and a kid bullying another kid. I like how you didn't acknowledge the feminist part of the comment.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:28 PM
-1

Seems like you feel it's worse than they do and you wanted to pin the blame on women, when the statistics aren't in your favor.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:26 PM
-4

Nothing prevents more men from becoming teachers. If you think it should change, get a teaching degree and become one. Don't bitch like the non-STEM people do about a lack of women in STEM.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:24 PM
0

As of the most recent statistic, it just hit 50% within the last few years. So no longer most, but men historically ran the schools directly until very recently. Men still make up about 75% of superintendents.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:21 PM
-1

There's no shame in admitting you were wrong and that a kid bullying another is never a "tumble".
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:17 PM
-2

Most principles and vice principals are men.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:15 PM
-9

No, it isn't the same message. There is no commonly used racial equivalent to "boys will be boys". I'm sure you would have no problem saying "Feminists will be feminists" given your past anti-feminism comments. You have no problem generalizing them.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:10 PM
-1

We're taking about this ad and in that ad is a kid bullying another on the ground. You called that a tumble.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:09 PM
-14

Not even remotely similar. Last I checked, there is no "blacks will be blacks" excuse while there is a "boys will be boys" excuse.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:06 PM
-5

So you're philosophy is to ignore, ignore, ignore, and then decide its time to get upset when that bullied kid decides to shoot up their school. Best to ignore the causes and only worry about the aftermath....
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:05 PM
0

You call one kid bullying another a "tumble"? And one wonders why two adults grow up to believe trying to knock each other out is proper behavior.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:00 PM
-18

So you believe that bad behavior should never be police by others? Interesting take. Might I ask why you are trying to police the contents of a commercial? Seems hypocritical.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:57 PM
0

Show me another commercial where there is a "high profile smearing of men".
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:55 PM
-20

You don't want men to police the behavior of other men? Then who should police it? Or do you believe it is best to simply ignore the behavior?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:47 PM
-4

One single commercial and suddenly is being shoved down people's throats? You realize that almost every commercial tends to be positive, many showing firefighters running into a flaming building or a bunch of team mates high fiving each other. "Boys will be boys" is the common excuse given by adults to avoid disciplining their child's bullying.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:39 PM
-4

So you don't believe pointing out flaws in behavior is useful in correcting bad behavior? You don't believe showing people standing up to the bad behavior is useful?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:22 PM
-14

You didn't answer the questions. Do you believe the only way to make people better is by ignoring the negative aspects that they keep doing? Do you believe it's okay that people celebrate Donald Trump's "Fuck your feelings" behavior?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:14 PM
-20

Why is it wrong to point out bad behavior? Why is it wrong to them show people standing up? Answer this, do you believe Terry Crews is not a victim? That the person who Crews accused of sexuality harassing him is a victim of an anti-masculinity movement? Do you believe cat calling is okay? And that someone who stands up to it is wrong for being anti-masculine? Do you believe that ads should only be positive in nature and never consider behaviors negatively?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:06 PM
-80

If you have a problem with the Gillette ad, then you are not supportive of Men's Rights. You are saying it's okay to harass and bully people because "boys will be boys". You're saying Terry Crews was not a victim and that the men that do stand up to injustice aren't masculine.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:57 PM
1

If I'm a troll, then that would mean your a troll as well for arguing with people. As for being a shill, if only I was being paid, but I doubt they'd be okay with my vulgar language.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 07:10 PM
0

Nope. I'm just having fun arguing with a bunch of butthurt children. Why are you so offended by the commercial? Did it really hit too close to home in its message? You seem to have no sympathy for the male victims in the commercial.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 05:31 PM
0

You're taking the ad way to personally... Unless of course you see a lot of that behavior and/or justifying of the behavior in yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 05:14 PM
-2

It's not attacking men. It's attacking the "boys will be boys" excuse used to justify our ignore toxic behavior. If you think cat calling, talking down on coworkers, and bullying are all okay behaviors because historically it's been accepted, you're in the wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 04:44 PM
-1

That's literally the reason the saying exist. It's used all the time to ignore school bullying.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 02:52 PM
-3

Putting it into perspective for PPD: How many times have you heard "Blacks will be blacks" to excuse bad behavior? Compare that to the number of times you have heard "boys will be boys" to excuse bad behavior. These two are not comparable.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/19 02:21 PM
1

You think they were enslaved and forced to promote the product?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:08 PM
1

You are completely capable of reading the thread yourself. This argument is useless because you've decided long ago that women are insignificant and that "boys will be boys" is an acceptable excuse for bad behavior.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 10:34 AM
4

Quite a big difference between the commercial's message and paying people to promote a product. Saying the "pot calling the kettles black" for this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:38 AM
2

There's more to civilization than building buildings. Yes, it is sexists to ignore women's contributions to civilization. The evidence is in this thread. You can read it, but your bias won't pick up on the constant comments that claim none of the events in the video were fights.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:07 PM
2

I'm seriously amazed at how sexist you are that you believe women are useless to civilization. I take it you're a frequenter of Jordan Peterson and MGTOW.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:44 PM
1

This is what the females of all sexually reproducing species do. Not true. Many do and many do not. Did you skip biology in grade school? Or sleep through class? It's not a contribution to civilization. It's just survival. Necessary for sure. Not special though. If you think that the nurturing of child doesn't contribute to civilization, you are an extremely sad and ignorant individual. We know from studies that the nurturing of a child influences their future. It influences how they learn, how …
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:03 PM
1

No it really is mostly men who have contributed to civilization. You're ignoring the contribution of 50% of the population. Do you believe babies raised themselves? How about the production of clothing early on? Picking certain vegetation and the production of meals should not be discounted. Not on this. Everybody keeps going on about the evil patriarchy and male failings. This ad is about the evils in excusing violence with "boys will be boys". Nearly everyone here, including yourself, are igno…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:01 PM
1

There is NOTHING wrong with this ad. You are intent on the ad being about women. It's about MEN and how MEN need to stand up for what is right. Why the fuck would they need to show women being bad in a commercial about men excusing "boys will be boys" mentality and then putting a stop to it? If you don't think women being mean to women commercials are a thing, here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j6YA03hm4k In a commercial about the toxicity of the 'boys being boys' excuse and men rising…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:23 PM
1

No. There is no "at best they cancel each other out." That's simply you trying to come up with an excuse for turning a video about men becoming better into one where women are the problem. The focus of the video had NOTHING to do with women and all to do about men excusing the bad behavior of other men, then showing men stepping up and being better. You seem intent on proving the ad as 100% good, while I'm only pointing out that while it has merits, it did not execute the ad perfectly. You're in…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:02 PM
-2

And you just ignored half of the fucking video. You ignored Terry Crews (#metoo bullshit? Way to ignore all the men that also came out about being victims), you ignored the father at the sink being a positive role model, the guy stepping in when the other acts like a prick to the lady, the man stopping the fight in the street, the father pulling the bully off the kid, the man running through the crowd to stop teens from beating up a kid, etc. You missed over half the fucking video because the fe…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:49 PM
-3

You cannot draw that implication from the 3 seconds or so of women being on screen. That's some stupid fucking logic that only serves to shift all blame to women instead of taking responsibility for our own side. You've managed to take a video about men, showing men over 90% of the time, showing men in both bad and good light, and say "Yeah, I get all the problems shown here are about how we promote the toxic 'boys will be boys' mentality.... BUT women are the true enemy."
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:30 PM
3

You mean kinda like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j6YA03hm4k I remember seeing many similar commercials that could be female equivalent ones. Sure, there are a lot of problems men need to work out. But we KNOW already. We’ve been told and we ARE working on it. If you go through this thread, you will see many don't know and many aren't working on it. There are many people in here defending the kid bullying the other on the ground and saying exactly that's basically just playing aroun…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:12 PM
-1

There's like five women in the whole video for maybe 3 seconds of screen time.... how the hell are you getting that idea from that video? Half the video is about toxicity, while the other half of the video shows people rising about it and doing something good.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:04 PM
0

Looks to me like one kid is beating up another. Definitely not playing when the kid on bottom is in distress. Saying that was just playing is like saying "Oh, he couldn't have been raped. Everyone knows men always want sex."
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:01 PM
0

Our society is where it is today because of men. Our society is where it is at today because of PEOPLE. There are more than enough positive ads that have been made and this is a nice change of pace. Really points out some of the things we should do better, instead of promoting the inaccurate idea that we're always the best.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:59 PM
1

For some people it's egalitarianism, same for some feminist. For others, it's definitely not their goal.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:17 PM
1

Egalitarianism is separate from MRA and Feminism. MRA focuses on men, feminism focuses on women, and egalitarianism doesn't focus on any single group.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:08 PM
1

We live in a society that often places the blame on the victim when they are sexuality assaulted. Be it their clothes, their location, or their level of intoxication. The idea of "rape culture" is that we are okay with rape, but rather that it's one of the only crimes where victim blaming is practiced even in the court of law. We have thousands of rape kits that go untested and destroyed each year because of how little we prioritize the crime. And it's not just women. Rape culture includes the i…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:56 AM
0

Deliberately pushing agendas of nonexistent phenomena that destabilise the symbiotic relationship between both sexes, such as there being an epidemic of false rape accusations. Two can play that stupid game.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:13 AM
0

You do realize that when you make the first claim, it is you that should provide evidence to support it right? I replied to your claim, not the other way around. What is your evidence that all of feminism is sexist?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:05 AM
-2

Then MRA's current wave is inherently sexist based on that belief. Right now MRA is falling towards the MGTOW and Jordan Peterson mentality, which are sexist.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:00 AM
-1

You are defining an entire group by its extremist. If you're going to define one group by its extremist minority, then you should define the other group by its extremist minority. Using your own argument against you, it's the equivalent of defining all liberals as Stalin and all conservatives as Leo Varadkar. It makes zero fucking sense.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:47 AM
-6

Yes, it would. Both have similar intents and both have extremist wanting to go further than the intent. If one is inherently sexist, the other is as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:20 AM
1

That would mean that Men's Rights is inherently sexist in its current form.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:10 AM
2

It's not supposed to be "pro-men". That insinuates that the goal should be superiority, rather than equality. If you want a sub for hate or to fulfill your superiority complex, go to MGTOW or Jordan Peterson's sub where they live to circle jerk about that. The idea that all the issues come from feminism is dead wrong. That type of toxic belief is detrimental to the purpose of men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:29 PM
1

But it's a far cry from how it was when it started. Too many MGTOW posters that think they should lead a war against feminism and women.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:03 PM
1

About the Journal Publishing contemporary poetry and fiction as well as reviews, critical commentary, and interviews of leading intellectual figures, the minnesota review curates smart, accessible collections of progressive new work. This eclectic survey provides lively and sophisticated signposts to navigating current critical discourse. Under the leadership of editor Janell Watson, the review will maintain its tradition of exploring the most exciting literary and critical developments for both…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 06:05 PM
-1

It's unbalanced because the process is unbalanced. They're the ones stuck with the medical issues and financial ones, therefore they get the right to choose whether to abort. If you don't want a kid, wear a condom or get snipped. Both reduce the risk significantly. Either way, don't make the rest of us, or the kid, pay for your fuck up.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:46 PM
1

Applied science is still science. Science doesn't mean "theory only".
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:26 PM
1

Medicine and engineering are both about problem solving. Both use the scientific method. They're both part of science. The US spends the most money because we're fucking morons that decided to have for-profit middle men between everything and split the pool into thousands instead of one giant pool.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 02:33 PM
1

Medicine is a subcategory of biological sciences. There is no "I guess it could be", it is science.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 08:28 PM
1

By choice it is worth noting.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 08:21 PM
3

For a short bit I was part of the boy scouts, the parents shit talk so many other parents and kids behind their backs. It's like high school for parents. Parents spent more time trying to figure out how to get someone else to leave the den than cheat at the pinewood derby races.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:53 PM
0

It's setup to give options of sex specific or co-ed. The OP is a moron and asshole.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:23 PM
-9

While no one publicly said anything, there's a possibility complaints were made privately.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:21 PM
-1

One sells popcorn and hate. The other sells cookie and love. I'd rather not give money to the group run by morons. Sorry, Mormons.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:18 PM
-10

This ranks up there with one of the dumbest and most sexist comments I've read in a bit.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:14 PM
1

I know nothing about you or your situation to form an opinion. If I simply went off your attitude on here, I'd say you sound more like the victimizer than the victim.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:35 PM
2

That is not consensual. That's FAR from consensual.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 11:37 PM
1

this isn't a ying yang man. For everyone one direction, there's multiple others. I mean, im not even going to debate you on the concrete differences, as it would be just be goalposts moving etc. I am simply going to appeal to a more philosophical authority. The two aren't mirror images of each other, they have different goals, different outlooks, different mannerisms, different issues. Keep in mind that I'm not the one saying all feminists are bad. I'm arguing exactly the point that this isn't b…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 10:18 PM
2

No, that's part one. I'm sure you've already heard the audio tape where he talks about "grabbing her by the pussy" to be able to understand he's not innocent.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 10:14 PM
1

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/opinion/why-trump-doubled-down-on-the-central-park-five.html
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:45 PM
1

Both groups have similar goals for the gender they represent. If you believe that the majority of feminists are anti-men, then the same has to be said of MensRights.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:30 PM
1

Tell that to the Central Park 5 and considering his own history (that he admitted to on audio), if he saw a man raping a woman he'd likely join in and make it a Devil's Triangle. Trump is right up there with Weinstein in morality.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:28 PM
0

Feminism is to anti-men as MensRights is to anti-women.You either accept that neither statement is true or that both statements are true. Are you going to finish your comments? It's annoying trying to determine if your sentence is finished when it lacks a period and doesn't end clearly. I'm afraid to response in case you're editing.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:42 PM
1

Justice is always served. Nicole Brown didn't get the justice she deserve. The Central Park 5 didn't get the justify they deserve and we have a sitting president that continues to attack them.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:40 PM
0

Every hate group does the same thing , fabricates violence and hatred to justify their own Your own words. I'd suggest you stop trying to fabricate hate to justify your own hate.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:38 PM
1

Every hate group does the same thing , fabricates violence and hatred to justify their own So exactly what you're trying to do by making feminism out to be anti-men. Fabricating hatred to justify your own.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:36 PM
1

The vocal minority get all the media attention on MensRights, but they are not the majority just as Milo Yiannopoulos does not represent even remotely the majority views of MensRights. His supporters are the minority that spam the most. Many of the pointers you have aren't right. For instance, the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 was not replaced or lobbied to be replaced by the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Not to mention, although it has a gendered titled, it is in fac…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:27 PM
1

Please research what Canada did to single male refugees to understand the hatred that you have of men. Are you claiming I hate men?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:24 PM
0

When a feminist says kill all white men, she is not a real feminist, but when a feminist supports the Duluth model, supports Witch hunt trials, male privileges, mansplaining But what? You failed to finish your comment for me to even give a response.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:20 PM
1

The current climate is investigate. That's how the legal system works, but if you're going to discuss how society views something, that's quite different. In that case, you have a large number of views. Some take the "accuser is always right", some take the "accused is always right", and then there's everything in between.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:19 PM
1

She points out that there is no such thing as moderate feminists in power. That in itself is a "No True Scotsman" style of argument.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:16 PM
1

You're out of your mind if you think there aren't anti-women on here.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:14 PM
1

This is what is happening: you are confusing critique of feminism with misogyny towards women. i'd put my every dollar on it. This sub consistently confuses the extremist feminist with the majority of feminists.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:26 PM
1

Except that is not what you said. Your post insinuates that you want them all to be quiet because "it has made the world worse for men and women."
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:10 PM
1

And yet here you are telling the entirety of the #metoo movement to be quiet, making life harder for actual victims.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:00 PM
1

Yeah, it's nice to think that way and all, but those 'minority' are most definitely the most vocal minority, so it is very hard to ignore them. That's how it typically goes. The most vocal people on MensRights are also the most anti-women, making the majority hard to hear. Is that not what goes on? That's not isolated to Reddit - that's how the world operates. The moment anyone is accused, their name is plastered everywhere (the accuser doesn't have this issue), and then the cat is out of the ba…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:55 PM
1

So you believe they should continue to be silent and allow sexual harassment to go unpunished?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:31 PM
1

So yes, MeToo should be for women and men alike, but currently, they're definitely not viewed the same. They are viewed the same, except by a very small group of people on both here and not on here. Those people I would considered to be the extremist and should be ignored until they accept that it is a movement for all.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:30 PM
10

So Terry Crews is a woman?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:10 PM
1

The #metoo movement is not limited to women. It's for anyone put in that situation and want a voice. So yes, you're wrong. They fit the narrative as well and by telling people that you don't think they fit that narrative, you're weakening their voice.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:37 PM
1

fuckmetoo That's extremely unnecessary and adds nothing to his post.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:26 PM
0

So you acknowledge that men controlled society and women had no say until men gave them the right, yet you somehow believe women always had an equal voice before then? That's not being logical, that's being retarded.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:03 PM
0

Apparently you grew up in the south where logic and women's history are avoided like the plague. How do we know they had no quantitative say in the outcome? For one, they weren't allowed to vote, the only quantitative method we have in decision making. That's fucking logic.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:58 PM
0

No, I'm not going to do the research for you because you should have learned this throughout k-12 education. You have the most illogical view of women I've ever seen. You think it's okay to call it cooperation when they had no say in the outcome. That's fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:51 PM
0

Go read a history book for proof and stop making this bullshit claim that women had it better because they weren't allowed to take risk.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:47 PM
1

When you do not have the right to vote, you lack the only quantitative method for representation.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:46 PM
0

Society means men and women decided. Women didn't decide this, men did. That's not society choosing shit.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:39 PM
1

A Devil's Triangle is two men having sex with the same woman at the same time. There is no requirement for it to be a bisexual activity where the men have sex with each other as well.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:36 PM
0

Let's go back to the beginning. Even in times of calm, men were still responsible for protection, provision, taming the wilderness, fighting the wild animals, killing for food, working in deadly situations just to feed women at home who never once had to risk her life for any aspect of her role. You're blaming women, but women were typically not allowed to perform those roles by men. In this specific comment, you are saying women had it better because they weren't allowed by men to do anything r…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:17 PM
1

That's a very balanced view. You cannot claim women had a voice in the matter when women were not allowed the right to vote. Why weren't they allowed the right to vote? Because men decided the laws that determined who could vote. Yes, women have a say in law, but that's not the full truth of the matter. The full truth is that their say has not held the same weight as men. There have been only 52 female US Senators in the US to date. We're at a record high number right now and it's only 23 women.…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:23 PM
1

Please be more balanced and recognise that men have been trapped in their role just as much as women have. Men have had much more choice in the roles they choose than women have historically. It's worth remembering much this conversation started. Someone made the claim women didn't deserve the right to vote, because only men went to war to die. They ignored the fact that men made the laws deciding who could go to war and that men were the only ones allowed to make laws. Somehow they view that as…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:37 PM
1

Stop comparing them to slaves, we already went through this. I'll stop comparing them to slaves the moment you stop trying to claim they had it great because men decided everything for them. You've entered the land of circular reasoning and if you want to resort to such blatantly obvious logical fallacies as opposed to arguing facts with proof, I'm out. You're saying women were slaves and the proof is that they were unhappy and the reason you say they were unhappy is because they were slaves. Lo…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:28 AM
2

The further you go back in time, the significant becomes a majority. Do you have any proof of what all women everywhere were or weren't happy about or are you just blowing more hot air? That's as dumb as asking me if I have any proof slaves everywhere were or weren't happy. You realize there are other religions in the world right? I said Abrahamic to start, because that covers three religions most Redditor's are familiar with. Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all have views that declare men as b…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:09 AM
2

I didn't put words in your mouth. I didn't claim you said any of that. What I said is that you're argument is equivalent to that. A significant number of women prior to the 1900's weren't exactly entering into marriage s voluntarily either. Hell, even today that's a major issue in non-Western countries. You act like women were happy that ask their decisions were made for them. They weren't. Religion has always been one of the prime reasons for oppression of women and minorities. Let a woman lear…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:57 AM
1

What you said is practically this Slaves had it great. Their masters provided them with food and shelter. They didn't have to go to eat to fight. They got to stay home and care for the crops and master's childer.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:31 AM
1

You're literally blaming women for men dictating their lives. Try this. Replace every instance of women in there with blacks. Sounds a lot like glorifying slavery.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:23 AM
1

You do realize that men were also the reason for those responsibilities, right? Is not like we let women have the choice to partake in those activities. We, men, created the rules that only men could fight in wars. Women did not have a vote in the matter. That's was our fault, not theirs. That's still our fault, not theirs. Men make up the majority of Congress and could pass a law tomorrow if they wanted killing off selective service.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:28 AM
3

Go talk to a therapist. You've got a list of problems you need to sort through and Gender Studies isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:59 PM
2

A mother helping apply sunscreen to her son is pedophilia? I take it you didn't bother to read the article? Also, Twitter auto-crops images which is what happened here and gave an unfortunate appearance.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:35 AM
3

The article's top image doesn't attempt to portray nudity by its cropping. The image on Twitter was auto-cropped by Twitter, not Vice.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:32 AM
2

Vice didn't choose to crop the photo that way. When an article is linked on Twitter, it will occasionally need to auto-crop an image, which is what happened in this case. Also, if you didn't notice, the photo is a mother applying sunscreen to her child (notice the residue on his side below the watch).
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:28 AM
1

it's the way Vice decided to showcase their album that made it seem a little uncomfortable. What specifically do you find problematic with how Vice showcased the album? Is it the cropped image from the OP's post? If so, that's not Vice's fault. That's Twitter auto-cropping the image.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:34 AM
5

Changing the sexes would not suddenly make applying sunblock a problem.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:18 PM
1

https://d2gg9evh47fn9z.cloudfront.net/thumb_COLOURBOX32262485.jpg Obviously not as many exist because of social stigma, but part of what men's rights was supposed to be about is tearing down those stigmas where a father cannot perform roles historically viewed as motherly. Seems like a lot of people here missed that point and want it to be an anti-women/feminism movement.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:58 PM
1

Lets say the girl was wearing a bathing suit, was incredibly young, and put in an extremely sexually suggestive photograph involving a much older man. It's a picture of a mother applying sunblock to her son you pervert.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:13 PM
1

Your mother helped apply sunblock when you were a kid?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:09 PM
8

There's nothing wrong with the eleventh picture once you notice the sunblock residue the mother is helping apply.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:08 PM
1

Looking at the picture further, it appears to be a mother helping put sunblock on her son. If you replaced the boy with a girl in a swimsuit, it wouldn't spark much conversation either. The problem appears to be with how Twitter or whatever social media truncated the image, accidentally portraying the picture to appear sexual in nature.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:03 PM
1

Many factors not accounted for and the design of this chart is absolute trash. Why the fuck are the bars varying in width?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:23 PM
-6

The latter can be applied to both parents. It's not limited to men. For the military draft, we should be upset that the men in congress (80% of its members) are unwilling to support its removal or expand to cover everyone. Edit: People here not like the fact that the gender (men) required forced to sign up for selective service is the same gender (men) that voted to implement selective service? Here's an idea: The gender that would be affected by a law should be the only gender that votes on the…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:36 AM
1

Her politics? The only politics she has is which gives her the loudest voice. She failed in the liberal circle. She failed in the anti-Trump conservative circle. She's succeeding in the pro-Trump alt-right circle. All within a couple years time.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:17 PM
1

Birds of a feather flock together.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:14 AM
1

Queer men can be incels, as you would know.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 01:57 AM
1

I guess I should lay off on you. We don't need another incel going on a shooting rampage.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 01:07 AM
1

Why would I want to try harder when it's already upset you?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:43 PM
1

You want an original thought and yet you posted something from a person who has never had an original thought in her lifetime.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:04 PM
1

You're scared people will see you for what you truly are.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:22 PM
1

Why not post on your main account?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:58 PM
1

Why did this sub feel the need to glamorize this attention whore? She's a wannabe Ann Coulter that will take whatever stance necessary to be relevant.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:30 PM
-11

Religion is a mental illness as well, but people love to encourage it. They've even gone as far to allow companies to use religion to justify discrimination . The owner of Planet Fitness should declare that their religious belief is that a trans male is a male and trans female is a female.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/18 03:19 AM
1

Given that we're allowing private businesses to decide when they'll provide a service based on their beliefs, why should Planet Fitness be forced to ignore its owner's belief?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/18 03:16 AM
1

Battlefield was never historically accurate or meant to be predominately historically accurate. Many weapons that were used were not location or time appropriate. People are crying about female characters because a dev mentioned it was to appeal to a larger audience. That triggered a certain anti-women crowd.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:17 PM
1

The clue its alternate history is that it's Battlefield. They have people a heads up with multiple previous games and with the trailer. DICE managed the situation perfectly. They are ignoring the small minority crying about female characters and paying attention to shit that actually matters with respect to gameplay.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:16 PM
0

There is no difference between female characters, ridiculous flight mechanics, and weapons being used in locations they wouldn't have been used in.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:25 PM
1

They can make it a shooter for any time period they want. It doesn't have to be historically accurate, especially since the previous games were not. They allow weapons to be used in battles where those weapons were never used. I'm sure you'll try to justify how that was for the sake of gameplay as well and different from female character models.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 11:11 PM
1

IT'S A GAME. IT'S ALL ABOUT GAMEPLAY. The fact is, they chose to ignore very simple realism to make a fun game. They are choosing to add female models to make it fun for others. After the first time DICE saw a person reenter a plane in flight, they could have easily fixed. They didn't. They chose enjoyment over realism to make players happier. Battlefield has never been a historically accurate series. They have always put player enjoyment over accuracy. If the addition of female models to a hist…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:09 PM
1

There's no old footage of pilots jumping in and out of a plane while in flight either. There were however women fighting for the French Resistance and for the Soviets. You keep trying to play a realism card that doesn't and had never existed in the Battlefield series. I'm part of that older crowd that started 15 years ago with BF1942. I expect a quality, enjoyable game and the addition of playable women models won't affect that. Micro transactions and bugs will.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:49 PM
1

Immersion is about selling the idea that the player is actually in a believable environment. And having women characters will not strip a person from being immersed in a believable environment. People asked for WWII, they didn't ask for an alternate universe version of WWII. The Battlefield series has never been the series for them if that is what they want.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:17 AM
1

Samurai swords are less immersion breaking than people jumping out of their planes mid-flight, shooting a person, and then reentering the plane.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 11:22 AM
2

It's scary that I cannot tell if you're being serious.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 11:18 AM
0

Whining about the inclusion of a character in a video game is not a men's right issue. If they were removing the male model and only having the female character, an argument could be made. Including both sexes in a video game that does not and has never claimed to be historically accurate is NOT an MRA issue.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:58 AM
0

I came into the thread because it's fascinating to see how many children get upset over something that had zero effect on gameplay, try to argue it is ruining the series by historically inaccurate, try to argue its "SWJ bullshit" killing their games (yes, they're game, not EA/Dice or anyone else's game), etc. It would make sense for people to be upset over micro transactions, pay to win, game breaking mechanics, and over powered items. It doesn't make sense to cry over cosmetics when BFOne had t…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:46 AM
0

What is annoying is hearing people try to claim a game that has never claimed to be historically accurate is being ruined by still not being historically accurate. Who gives a shit if the choice to include a female soldier is political. It's NOT and NEVER HAS BEEN a historically accurate game. They have always put player enjoyment over realism. If a person has an issue with a female soldier in the game and not a problem with players re-entering a plane mid-flight, they're a moron. The latter is …
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:24 AM
-2

You think that somehow a video game that never claims to be historically accurate is creating an appended history that people might believe in 100 years or more. That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:09 AM
2

Franzmayr, whose application was rated 0.25 percent higher than Zechner's, sued for gender discrimination. 0.25%? How are they creating that number? Does it factor in letters of recommendation? What about success rate for projects? Or is it all just based on the resume mentioning keywords? I could imagine being able to rate something 10%, but no way in fuck would 0.25% exceed the margin of error.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/18 02:55 AM
1

A wrong weapon existing in game is less realistic than a female combatant. That's not a "mechanical conceit". It's a deliberate choice.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:40 AM
1

Played BF since the early days. Calling it historically accurate is like calling The Odyssey a historically accurate story. It mentions some real people, locations, and artefacts, but the story and most of the gameplay are no where close to being based in reality.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:13 AM
-3

Are you claiming people in the future might confuse a video game for being historically accurate? Do you also believe The Odyssey is a historically accurate story?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:01 AM
1

So what you're saying is all the other glaring historical inaccuracies aren't a problem, but women characters is where you draw the line.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:52 AM
2

The only problem you WOULD HAVE is IF the game was pretending to be legitimate history. It's not meant to be taken as historically accurate, just as previous Battlefield games were never designed to be taken as historically accurate. If you honestly believe that ridiculous claim, please post a source from EA or Dice saying it's meant to be historically accurate.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:49 AM
1

If you honestly think Battlefield 5 is meant to be taken as historically accurate, you're as dumb as Trump.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:47 AM
0

Given that a big thread earlier was about McGowan and Bourdain's ex-gf's issues with Weinstein and many people on here taking the stance they were only making accusations for publicity, it's easy to see why the obvious sometimes needs to be stated.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 11:48 PM
1

Maybe, but I've noticed a lot more women who don't care than the other way round. And I've noticed the men on here are far more vocally anti-women than the feminist I've known. Anecdotal evidence means jack shit. She may be an opportunist, but that doesn't mean she doesn't happen to be right about this. She might be right, she might be wrong. That's why her comments should be taken with a grain of salt. A large large grain.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 12:52 PM
1

A lot of people here don't care about women's rights. There are just as many misogynist in MRA as there are anti-men in feminism. She is untrustworthy and trusting her on this topic as well should be taken with a grain of salt. She is an opportunist. People saw the link, but it is being ignored because it doesn't fit the agenda.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 12:14 PM
-4

Most of them don't, unless you're going to also claim most MRA also believe themselves to be "morally superior" while at the same time being hypocritical. I'm curious how many people here have read the article I linked or if they just read the link's URL, because anyone that isn't an MRA "hypocritical cunt" wouldn't be rallying behind her or trust her. To summarize it, she harassed a guy for not wanting to meet with her and if you read the texts, it's easy to see why he wouldn't. The enemy of th…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 10:52 PM
-6

Generalizing feminists is just as bad as generalizing MRA. If you wish to be a generally good person as your other comment suggest, stop generalizing to start.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 10:22 PM
-7

Leah McSweeney's words should be taken with a grain of salt. She is possible as toxic, if not more, than what she is accusing Argento and McGowan of being. https://www.queerty.com/d-list-designer-leah-mcsweeney-unleashes-racism-homophobia-snls-michael-che-rejects-20170112
/r/MensRights06/07/18 09:03 PM
3

It's not masculinity that makes for better kids, it's simply having a second parent. Two moms or two dads does just as well.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:33 AM
–

are bedrock beliefs in our society. No.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:51 PM
–

An EXTREMELY small, insignificant number of people believe that. Saying "they" as though its the majority is like claiming every MensRights advocate is a follower of The Red Pill and MGTOW.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:51 PM
-1

Yes we care that the lying piece of shit Donald Trump most likely illegally used campaign money to silence someone he paid to have sex with shortly before/after his wife gave birth.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:13 AM
0

Them we'll spend all day talking about red and no one will continue to give a shit about blue.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:52 PM
0

Sounds like you have no idea what derailing means.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:27 PM
0

If I'm here to derail anything, it's your attempt to blame women and feminism instead of taking about men's issues. If giving a topic like jail time, you'd rather phrase it as "feminist don't care that men are awarded harsher penalties for the same crime" than to simply say "for the same crime, men are awarded harsher penalties". The latter is how you inform people of an inequality problem. Not the former. Let's take one of your own post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7za41n/the_b…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:45 PM
0

I'm for advancing men's issues. What I'm doing is describing those issues when they are discussed WITHOUT making the discussion even remotely come close to being women's or feminism's fault.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 08:07 PM
0

You aren't encouraging people to focus any little bit on men when you start off complaining about women and feminism first. If someone says "Fuck red, support blue", the leading question will always be "what's wrong with red?". Then you spend all your time discussing red and barely ever able to discuss blue.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:31 PM
-1

That's the last effective way to raise awareness beyond not saying anything at all. You raise awareness by building up your issues, not by tearing everyone else's down.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:12 PM
-6

When a sub about MensRights spends more time complaining about feminism than actual rights, why call it MensRights instead of Antifeminism?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:07 PM
0

When you complain about any focus on women's rights, that becomes the focus over ignoring men. There's more focus on this sub on "destroying feminism" than dealing with make issues. You mention the idea of someone using the term "toxic blackness" and I hope you realize the irony of using that argument when there's a post on the front page that equates to saying "toxic feminist". https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/82tggw/rather_than_helping_women_mutant_strands_of/ The top post of all t…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:59 PM
-1

I'm trying to keep it on the tracks while a lot of people here spend more time trying to find ways to complain about feminism and women than find ways to fix problems. If someone didn't know any better, the multiple posts on the front page would lead people to believe it's "International Complain About International Women's Day Day".
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:16 PM
-9

Go look at the front page. More posts bitching about women being "the problem" than discussing how to fix inequalities.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:39 PM
–

While he may be preaching to the choir, unfortunately the loudest members are anti-women and continue to harm its image.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:37 PM
3

If every country is 2:1, would that mean that districts would end up being 2:1? No. It wouldn't. It would mean all 8 districts would be one party because all 8 districts would be won 2:1. Like I said, make the lines simple using an algorithm, it removes the gerrymandering, and we celebrate another republican losing power.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 08:31 PM
3

The fairest lines would be simple, even though that means secured Democrat districts, i.e. no republican representatives. Therefore, the current lines being 7:1 more accurately represent Maryland than the previous ones that were 6:2. Are you arguing that Maryland should be gerrymandered to give a second seat to Republicans or do you believe a simple map should be drawn even though that removes the last seat?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:50 PM
1

Are you arguing for increased gerrymandering?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:33 PM
2

Gerrymandering can lead to voter suppression laws. North Carolina is a good example of how gerrymandering allowed the GOP to suppress a large voting population.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:45 PM
2

No, that's not at all what I said and I have no idea how you came to believe that. What I said is that NEITHER today's or 2002's maps are simple. The two maps are very similar in how they snake districts around. Claiming 2002 is better/simpler than today's or vice versa is a ridiculous claim.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:41 PM
1

When a party gerrymanders a state and passes laws that suppress select people's right to vote, how can it not affect a presidential election? That's thousands of people being prevented or dissuaded from legally voting for a presidential candidate of their choice.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:23 PM
2

That's not what I said at all, but good try. Neither map is simple or simpler than the other.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:18 PM
2

Go look at the 2002 district map and figure out how that was designed any simpler than today's.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:05 PM
3

Sure, you can gerrymander district lines to make Republicans having more representatives, but not with SIMPLE district lines. You misunderstand me if you think I'm defending gerrymandering in Maryland. I'm 100% for simple district lines that remove the gerrymandering because it would mean no more republicans representing Maryland. Maybe then the GOP will start helping push for proportional representation throughout the US.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:44 PM
–

Voter suppression played a role in the presidential election. Gerrymandering played a role in letting voter suppression happen. You cannot claim thousands of people being prevented from legally voting didn't play a role.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:19 PM
–

You are not understanding what I wrote. Yes, it put a large number of Republicans in one district, but without having done so, it would be 8 secure Democrat districts. It's a state that has no simple solution other than proportional representation of Republicans want more than 1 representative.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:58 PM
–

What I asked for was one gerrymandered as badly, meaning a state that the balance of representation is disproportionate. There are twice as many democrat voters than republican in Maryland and fairly evenly distributed throughout the state. You cannot draw a simple districting map of Maryland and end up with multiple Republican representatives. Read about North Carolina if you want to see gerrymandering and voter suppression in action.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:52 PM
–

I don't think you understood what I wrote. Maryland is gerrymandered by Democrats, but contrary to the norm, it benefits Republicans by giving them a seat they wouldn't normally have with simple lines drawn. For Republicans to have more than 1 seat, the map could not be drawn with simple districts.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:26 PM
–

Last I checked, Maryland isn't pushing for laws that promote suppression. Unless I'm mistaken, then please link me to a source where they are purging voters from the books or limiting resources primarily targeted at certain races, wealth, or political leaning. As nasty looking as Maryland's districting is, the gerrymandering there put in place a Republican when any simpler map would have made it completely Democrat. Even still, I do agree that the lines should be made simpler if they aren't goin…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:16 PM
–

Chicago is bad, but with simple lines drawn like Iowa, even the GOP acknowledge they won't change the states majority party by a long shot. It's no where near as problematic as places like North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Another heavily gerrymandered state is Maryland, but interesting thing about Maryland is that without gerrymandering, it would have 8 Democrats and no Republicans compared to the current situation of 7:1.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:59 PM
–

Gerrymandering allows for voter suppression. Whether through selective purging or limiting voter locations and resources. Also, show me a state where any other party gerrymandered anything close to Republicans.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:33 PM
–

Gerrymandering and voter suppression happened. It's pointless for me to vote where I live, even though the state was determined by the court to be racially gerrymandered by the GOP. The GOP are even on record admitting that is exactly what they did, but now we're stuck waiting for the Supreme Court hears whether it's illegal. We can all guess how that'll turn out with a shitbag like Gorsuch being one of the judges.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:24 PM
2

I don't understand your comment. It's pretty obvious to everyone that I'm ranting about this retarded meme.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:46 PM
1

I'm not complaining about the sub. The sub is fine. I'm complaining about this stupid meme that makes the sub look like children. It's dragging this entire fucking sub down and turning it from a place to talk legitimate issues to one that sounds like it's a T_D breeding ground.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:47 PM
1

That's actually my point. Making memes bitching about how some feminists are complaining about manspreading is NOT a legitimate men's issue. To use this shitty meme against its author, "real MRA aren't out there making shitty memes about manspreading. They're out there doing something to promote equality."
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:35 PM
1

Sorry, but I'm not part of that group if one exist. The meme is fucking pathetic and makes it sound like you cannot argue for multiple things at once. It's like making a meme against MRA where you say "Real MRA don't care about alimony. Real MRA are out there fighting ISIS!" That sort of pathetic fucking gatekeeping makes MRA look like a bunch of children with no legitimate issues.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:20 PM
0

r/gatekeeping would love this.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:08 PM
1

It gets lumped in because since last year, the alt-right extremist from T_D and other subs have been allowed to slowly, but steadily manipulate the discussions on here to become more extremist in nature than civil.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:24 PM
1

Did they discuss and mock Obama's drug past? Did people in the media discuss it? Yes, but they didn't mock it, nor did they mock Laura Bush for her usage (only for her hypocrisy towards users). Did they mock Hillary for laughing that the rapist she was defending passed the lie detector test? Yup. That is completely insulting to say they're muscular. Considering how the Republicans loved to claim Michelle was actually a male, it was mocking. Calling them the hulks is completely the same as portra…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:00 PM
1

Laura was called a drug addict highly medicated by Sandra Barnhart on the view. Discussing Laura's history using (and to an extent, dealing) drugs is fair play. SNL made fun of the bush twins. Uh huh, sure. I guess u never watched snl bashing her nonstop during the campaign. It's fucking SNL. They've done that 30+ years and they mock both sides. They did one with Obama and Michelle where they undergo Hulk-like transformations. Some of SNL's most successful skits were with Phil Hartman and Darrel…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:01 PM
1

Bush was called a monkey. Palin's special needs son was made fun of. The obamas were bashed, BUT the media and Hollywood were there to kiss the ground they walk on. Bush was mocked (like all presidents are), but practically no one bashed Laura or their daughters. As for Palin, people for the most part left her family alone during the campaign season. It was after she lost and continued her own insults the more people decided an eye for an eye was acceptable. President Trump attacks people's phys…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:16 PM
1

I see people attack their appearance (as often happens with Trumps kids, Stephen Miller, etc) I really fucking hate it. It's really just all coming back around though. You don't get to spend 8+ years normalizing the shitting on the appearances of Obama, his family, and other opponents, then expect your opponents to not return the favor. “Michelle Obama. I’d like her to return to being a male and let loose in the outback of Zimbabwe where she lives comfortable in a cave with Maxie, the gorilla.” …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:39 AM
6

This isn't even a blind feminist thing or them vilifying. It's Breitbart, an alt right media group, making something out of nothing hoping to gain more followers. Breitbart sees the Men's Rights movement as weak and easy to influence, and people here seem to be more than happy to be played into their hands.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:02 PM
9

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way. When they're listing reasons why someone might not like the movie is an appropriate point to point something out. It's a large review and somehow people here are whining about a minor sentence. It's seriously pathetic in the realm of things to whine about, especially when the group whining about that single sentence ar…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:32 PM
18

The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way. It's the last paragraph. At no point does it say "trigger warning" or even elude to it. All it says it some might dislike it for certain reasons. People here need to stop creating false drama.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:29 PM
–

Just curious, but did you read the USA Today review? It's actually very good and they definitely did not complain about a lack of diversity. What's happening here is the same issue regarding Doctor Who where media outlets (in this case, Breitbart) are creating fake drama and people are eating it up without bothering to read the articles they are referencing.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:27 PM
–

It remains a question if the most qualified candidate mattered. What the study fails to determine is whether it is experience that wins out, or resume/CV writing ability, or a combination of the two. They need to run a study where given the same set of data a group from each gender produce a resume/CV to determine if writing styles favor one gender over the other.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:27 PM
3

Same. Never seen them not support the poster except in cases where the poster is 100% clearly in the wrong and caught lying.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:14 PM
–

What would be fair is to list both mean and median. Median by itself is a horrible statistic.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:13 AM
1

Can't really say they didn't allow him because we didn't see him walk up and ask like the guy in this first 2 seconds did.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 10:36 PM
–

They have the right to assemble but not the right to keep people from traveling. He could have walked past them like others managed to do at the beginning of the video.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 03:25 PM
–

The latter. The lady was being allowed to pass and the guy took it as an opportunity to ran into the back of her to get through.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 02:02 PM
1

Clarkson needs to punch Piers again. Piers comment isn't a good point, it's trivializing what men's rights is about into a masculinity issue.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:52 PM
–

Less funny now knowing it is staged.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/16 02:01 PM
4

Fox is the worst though. CNN is shit as well, but Fox goes above and beyond when it comes to their agenda and misinforming its viewers. They refuse to call themselves mainstream media when they're the leading cable "news" channel.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 01:57 AM
2

I suggest not trying to restrain her or him, as the police are forced to charge you first and foremost. Best thing to do is just run the moment you can to a place you can be safe, such as a neighbor or somewhere public like a store.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 12:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter