TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Palpz Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Palpz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Generally speaking, I am against banning something that might be good for an individual to do (or something an individual may just want) just because it's bad for society overall.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 02:36 PM
11

This isn't even at that level. It's like atheists pissing their pants about crosses displayed on private property. If stupid men want to buy vapid women free drinks, that's their business.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:54 AM
3

His daughter didn't write into Jezebel. She wrote into Dear Prudence, an advice columnist for Slate. Jezebel just decided to comment upon it.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 01:04 PM
1

Her column's home paper is the Chicago Tribune. Hardly a rag.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:37 AM
1

Cross-posted to r/AdviceColumnists.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:27 AM
-3

I was gonna follow up with a "nice", but thought I'd check the article for a photo first. Yeah... not so much.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:10 AM
2

Suffice it to say I'm not about to get all worked up about this guy being "raped" merely because California's statutory rape laws are stupid as shit.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 03:45 PM
3

Huh. Slow news day, eh?
/r/MensRights24/10/11 01:31 PM
15

Well, no. That fact isn't racist. What is racist is when you use that "fact" to judge any individual black person who isn't in jail, or black people as a whole.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:16 PM
112

Fair? What the fuck is fair? Is it accurate?
/r/MensRights01/10/11 07:04 PM
1

Pseudo cross-posted to r/AdviceColumnists (using the wash-po link).
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:45 PM
5

Obligatory related plug for r/AdviceColumnists Also, that is indeed messed up. Not really sure it's a Men's Rights issue, I could easily see a dude doing this too.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:53 AM
7

They can save the link and view it later when they get home.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:25 PM
5

I'd make it a good decade, just to be sure. And of course expel anyone involved.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:22 AM
3

Depends. Obviously this may vary by jurisdiction, but my interpertation of the revelant sections of BC's Privacy act indicate to me that it would be illegal if it was the site itself posting the photo in their ads; A person posting it on their profile is not doing so with the intention of selling services, they're doing so with the intention of getting a date, so it would not be a violation of privacy per say. If the rest of the profile also matched the details of the other person, it might be c…
/r/MensRights25/08/11 03:40 PM
2

And by the legal definition in most jurisdictions I've checked out (vice Quebec), that would not be considered a breach of privacy, unless said image was used in a advertisement of some sort.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 03:09 PM
2

Wow. Do you know if there's any comparable studies that have been about the effect on children of being raised by a single father?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:51 AM
1

Nice find. I've crossposted it to r/AdviceColumnists. Feel free to join us if you're a fan.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:12 PM
5

44.7% of the Reddit users come from the USA and they generate 53.6% of the pageviews on Reddit. But no, please, go on making assumptions. Also, per capita, Canadians have the most redditors.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 10:36 AM
5

If makes you so angry maybe you should use your voice as a woman and speak out about it more publically. I'm not saying you have to bring it up at every cocktail party or something but it seems like you've thought about it so I bet more people would listen to it coming from a female. Ha! I got it. I didn't say a damn thing about you being a woman. But your reply includes "why because I'm a woman?" Ummm yeah, you kinda did.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 02:55 AM
1

Eh? It doesn't seem like she's being sheepish about this at all. In fact she seems like she's rather outspoken about the issue whenever it comes up. That just apparently doesn't stop judgmental idiots from being judgmental idiots.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 01:43 PM
6

Well then bring your lawyer into the equation, duh.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:36 AM
19

Maybe she said it wrong.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 01:00 PM
8

It would discourage her and others from committing fraud. This is pretty much the entire purpose of the legal justice system.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 07:44 PM
2

Carolyn Hax is by far my favorite advice columnist. Sure, she does have her biases like everyone else (mostly when it comes to her pro-reproduction stance), but she at least seems to always make an effort to recognize them and talk around them rather than from them.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 08:54 AM
4

The rainbow - noah's ark thing is a bit of a bloody stretch. The bible's a pretty long bloody book. There's not many symbols that don't occur in it at one point or another.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:22 AM
2

What's that, people actually waiting until their career is well enough established that they're fairly certain that they can their partner can afford to have a kid before they decide to create another human being? Huzzah!
/r/MensRights02/04/11 02:28 PM
2

Well, it answers your initial question, refutes the follow on statement, and gives an indication that things appear to be improving.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:59 PM
1

Oh, you and your stating examples that have actually happened instead of relying on people who you desperately hope would do the same thing (because it'll validate your political worldview).
/r/MensRights26/03/11 11:27 AM
2

The poverty rate among African Americans has decreased from 26.5% in 1998 to 24.7% in 2004.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 11:25 AM
3

If you don't have kids, you'll still pay to educate them. If your house doesn't catch on fire, you'll still need to pay for the taxes to run the fire department. If you're not personally an astronaut, you'll still pay for the space program. Etc etc. While many of these programs do benefit certain people directly, overall they also benefit society as a whole. Thus, as a member of said society, you're expected to contribute.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:28 PM
2

Opponents – not least the small business lobby – have cried foul, arguing that such moves will engulf employers with red tape. Indeed there have been reports that businesses employing 10 or fewer people could yet be exempted from the legislation altogether.r people could yet be exempted from the legislation altogether. But yeah, we get it. Small business owners are less able to afford to take time off than most might. Either hire someone else to fill in for you or suck it up and don't take the t…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:57 AM
1

Pfft, yeah right. A catholic priest raping an adult female? Like anyone's going to believe that story!
/r/MensRights17/03/11 01:04 PM
2

Meh, a lot of guys will view their girlfriend being attracted to women as a plus, as it might increase their chances of getting a threesome. Women on the other hand seem to be much less interested in having a ffm threesome, so their significant other cheating on them is a less likely to be viewed either as a positive or at least a neutral factor.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 10:10 AM
0

Ok, so what was the problem, title XI, or the schools inability to comply with it? I mean, it's not like they've had 25 years to try and figure out how to deal with existing regulations and all. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights30/01/11 10:00 AM
-1

Browse for and purchase said book without stopping to sit and read it in the children's section. Should you still feel the need to read it, find another place to do so?
/r/MensRights30/01/11 09:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter