TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pandamonius84 Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by Pandamonius84 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

...Good Bot?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:48 PM
29

One of us...One of us.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:56 PM
9

Misdirection. Takes the focus off her actions and what happened too Max and makes it about her abuse. Also tries to make it look like Max was ok with the prank after he got done reacting to a stranger grabbing his junk while he was asleep.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:51 PM
26

“I told him that something happened in the bathroom at the party with these two guys, that I didn’t want to happen.” That is the most cut and dry definition of rape/sex assault. If you didn't consent and they did it anyway that is rape. So it makes absolutely no fucking sense that you told the Detective that you weren't sexually assaulted yet you didn't consent to getting a train ran on you. What crime did you think the police were going to investigate when you told the Detective “...something h…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/18 11:52 PM
8

They are like white males and I slaughtered them like white males! I hate them!
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:47 PM
78

Does the race changing include Lizard?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 01:55 PM
12

Women wearing hijabs are just as successful as skirt-wearing Women?! I demand a source for your claims.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 01:45 AM
100

I'm guessing your from /r/all. /r/Mensrights has always been critical of feminism or feminist speakers. We do have pro-men stuff here like men's shelters, suicide awareness, etc. Just that all of the top upvotes are this sort of thing. Same logic when it comes to /r/politics. It's a sub dedicated to US politics. But that's now just an anti-Trump circlejerk/Russia investigation where the actual policy content doesn't get the same amount of upvotes/publicity.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:04 PM
19

Janelle Monae isn't being silenced. She's on a microphone which is what this thread is all about explaining the irony. OP is saying that he just no long listens to what someone like Monae is saying when she says "women won't be silenced." Being Deaf and mute both involve silencing noise. But here OP is referring to silencing of the hearing kind while Monae is referring to silence of the vocal kind. The 1st Amendment makes it clear that individuals have the right to speak out and use their voice.…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:59 PM
10

Then she is going to love the MGTOW movement!
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:59 PM
5

Every time I see this sub get to /r/all it's all anti-feminism or something like that. All the quality content like the anti-circumcision, homeless shelters for men, etc barely make it to front page and don't get that much upvotes. Even this post 1 hour after had about 2k upvotes and this sub averages about 600 people online a day unless a post like this gets /r/all or someone posts this on another thread to troll and gets bombarded as retaliation.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:10 PM
-1

Thank you for the answer!
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:00 PM
14

/r/Mensrights has always been critical of feminism. It would be more wtf if that stopped for an extended length of time.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:59 PM
5

You would be willing to explain why you think it's nonsense?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:56 PM
-21

That's nice. So what's your opinion about the woman who is breaking up sexual initiation camps and forced child marriages?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:28 PM
51

Male has sex with underage girl: Prison sentence + register as sex offender, loses job, can't show face in society. Woman has sex with underage male: Minor jail time, small fine, loses job but can still get another one, gets money from male if she gets pregnant with his kid. The whole thing is comparing applies to oranges thinking that males who have been sexually abused by females gets treated the same as the reverse.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:50 AM
23

I mean...they remove the Neeson story, yet had no problem keeping James Franco's story up. The mods don't seem to have a consistent standard when it comes to #Metoo stories.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 03:43 AM
9

I also heard that Michelle had a reshoot clause in her contract while Mark didn't have a clause so they had to negotiate a price for Mark reshooting the scenes.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:47 PM
4

He didn't get sent to jail because it was revealed that police had hid text messages that showed he was innocent. Had those messages never got revealed, he most likely would have been convicted. During such time he had his name smeared by the media labeled a "rapist" which in today's world is a life-ruiner. Now that he's innocent, he still has a label of "wrongly accused of rape" which might as well be "accused, but not convicted." The whole point is why is it to destroy someone's life BEFORE he…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:48 AM
9

Time to break the cycle.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:47 PM
7

Agreed to busy trying to worry about my computer exploding over Y2K bug.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:03 PM
2

How does a 22 year old become a high school science teacher THAT quick!?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:29 PM
2

I understood that reference!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/17 02:33 PM
0

Oh we were talking about washed cloths. I thought not washing was implied. My mistake
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:52 PM
-5

That's not male privilage, that's called neglectful personal hygiene.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:37 PM
2

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Obama twice. I'm pretty liberal when it comes to corporate taxes, tax reform, student loan debt, etc. Both Dems & Republicans policy tend to draw interest as to whether it will benefit or hinder rights of women and minorities. When it comes to issues for males there isn't as big a problem. For example if there was debate about VA reform, it will focus more on "veterans" not makes given how big the gender gap is in the army. If it's about circumcision the…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:26 PM
1

Neutral party here. You or /u/5th_Law_of_Robotics better provide some link to this supposed argument to clear things up about what was said or wasn't said. Cause from reading the whole chain your talking about something that a fair amount of users are /r/outoftheloop.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:38 PM
2

Whoops my mistake fellow Redditor.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:45 PM
1

Mansplaining is a term that is used when someone (usually a man) tells someone else (usually a woman) about something that is viewed by the latter in a condescending way. (Google search of term)
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:26 PM
-2

Hello fellow Panda tips bamboo stick
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:13 PM
10

Correctly me if I'm wrong, but in the books a Sansa-lookalike is married to Ramsey and goes through all the terrible tortures. In the show, that character doesn't exist so they had real Sansa instead. A lot of it is because Theon up to that point wasn't well liked so his torture can be "justified" for killing 2 random boys who he says is the little Stark boys, betrays his adopted country/family, etc. For Sansa she hasn't done any bad (besides questionable decision making) and was a tragic charac…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:13 PM
3

There is also "queer" btw. Also homosexual doesn't mean feminize. That is a pop-culture narrative. Gays aren't any different than regular men, they just chose to have sexual relations with other males. Yes some do "tight clothing, high pitch voice, super flirtatious" identity, but that is a minority of gay individuals. So the fact that men are just as likely to commit suicide as women are, yet men are more than 3.5× more likely to die when they do commit suicide. Men also don't have the same amo…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:48 PM
9

There is more derogatory names for men then just "dick" and "prick". I'm not going to list them because some are homophobic but to limit names to just 2 is not accurate. Also men do face nitpicking of clothing choice/fashion stance and sexual activity (mainly the lack of). Also nobody more specifically employers is forcing women to go to this subreddit, as that would be cruel and any employer who does deserves a well placed fist in the face. People are free to come to this subreddit and also fre…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:22 PM
3

So do you have a similar stance to the word "mansplaining" as hate speech? Because any word that denotes gender plus -splaining should be denounced as hate speech.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:07 PM
3

Again I agree with most of what your saying. I'll agree that it is a privilege to guide someone to be a good person, role model, success in life, etc. I'm just trying to say that there are circumstances (i.e. really terrible divorce, bitter ex-wife, kids get moved out of state or town, kids get groomed that their father is shit and shouldn't be trusted) where they don't get such a privilege because it's not his fault (or entirely his fault.) That's what this sub should be fighting to spread awar…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:37 PM
11

I'll agree to the responsibility bit as any parent should be responsible for the upbringing of their children so that they can be successful in life and be a good person. But you better clarify the privilege statement. It's privilege that a father will be lucky to spend time with his son or daughter if they aren't given full custody yet have to make alimony payments hoping that it's being used for the child's welfare. Family courts don't do enough when it comes to Father's rights and their child…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:10 PM
0

Was his name Clayton Bigsby?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:38 PM
25

A slide requires that at some point Heard was on top of her career. The only time she was on top was because her sugar-daddy wanted to change positions.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:22 PM
1

Caving? The decision to not have kids is a decision from owners/management. Those who don't like kids being around see it as a plus but have the decency to not flat out tell parents that their kids are annoying (but yes some assholes do exist and will say so.) If they go to management they aren't going up to them begging for kids to be ban, they are going up because management should do something to stop an unrulely child or tell the parents to keep their child calm. Plus even if they are banned…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:36 PM
0

Not really. If you have gone to a Resturant I'm sure you've encountered kids. While a good amount behave fairly, some will run around, scream, cry, etc. Parents who bring kids are also more demanding that food be brought to the kids right away (which is why the kids good section usually gets out faster.) Because kids will be more willing to complain about hunger quicker than adults. Also they will leave less of a tip of the child isn't provided for on the double. You also need to give them items…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:15 PM
2

McDains Resturant in Monroeville. It was 6 years old not 12 as previously stated. http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2011/07/16/mcdains-restaurant-children-policy-in-effect/ There is also an Italian restaurant in NC that did the same thing that is more recent. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/food/wp/2017/03/31/thank-you-for-taking-a-stand-customers-flock-after-upscale-restaurant-bans-kids/
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:38 PM
16

Because some people believe discrimination of any form is evil and a stain of society. There was a bar near Pittsburgh that refused to let kids under the age of 12 be allowed in or get served and they got some heat from those who said in discriminated against parents, yet missed the point as to why you'll let your 5 year old in an establishment that primary serves alcohol and is adult themed (not xxx adult just to be clear).
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:36 PM
1

So then rebuttal the person who stated the classroom/he response. I didn't make such statements cause I know them to be a person's ideal preference, not factual. I only brought up military as I want clarification as to how someone believes the army being dominated by men is a dysfunctional. So now my question to you: Is men being in charge of the VA the primary reason for the dysfunction? If not than how big of a percentage is gender the cause of dysfunction?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 09:16 PM
1

Thank you for the clear up. "Seem to suggest" doesn't mean "stated" it's up to the one who is reading Tyson's commit if he believes that to be true. But since we don't know if Tyson was thinking such a way, if he personally believes that, etc we can only go off that Tyson believes that most qualified is the ideal way for electing officials, a genderless idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 07:58 PM
1

But you didn't make any point about incompetence is gender neutral, just that the VA should be added to list of armed service organizations to olh example. But I'll let you make such a case just so everything is clear.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 07:13 PM
1

Ok now I'm confused. Your 1st post was a rebuttal to the argument that men in high level positions are more capable than women. I asked for evidence that there is correlation between capacity and gender. Nothing of substance was provided with the army bit besides clarification that you are referring to high ranking generals or higher level person's. Then once I repeat that gender and capacity don't have any correlation you say that is what you've been your point. So are you making a claim that a…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 07:06 PM
1

Then say heads/leaders of the army instead of just army. It makes it sound like a criticism of the lower level soldiers who are just following orders. But still even if the heads are incompetent, it doesn't have to do with their gender just their own capacity.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 06:44 PM
2

Except VA isn't a standing military force, it's a service to help and provide services to serviceman, their families, ex-military, etc. But you are correct that VA has a lot of problems that need to be fixed.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 06:36 PM
1

Well I agree with you. She'll be portrayed to much as Hillary 2.0 by Trump supporters along with other issues that make her a good candidate.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 06:13 PM
1

I asked for what we should be advocating for stop inequality from existing. Not reasons for why someone can make an argument for the lack of women plus minorites in government.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 06:11 PM
1

Ok Thank you for the clarification. We do agree that EE for Congress would be a bad idea. Could you be a bit more specific as to what overall values our nation should have to combat inequality or what we should be advocating for to end this issue?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 05:35 PM
0

I'm not contexting anything but please help me with what your perception of my context is so I can clear things up. So what your basically saying is a Machiavellian "ends justify means." That representation of men and women should be near "symmetrical" if it solves inequality of proportionally. Well there are 2 ways that happens... You increase the number of seats in Congress and given those seats to specific individuals with preferred traits to achieve an equal level of men and women. You decre…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:52 PM
1

All good fine redditor! It happens =)
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:36 PM
2

First off not a Republican. Bernie Sanders supporter, voted for Obama twice, didn't support Iraq war. Second, you specifically mentioned army during Iraq war. If that is the case than I agree with you that the war was poorly run. But that is the fault of those in charge. If top generals make an error that results in deaths, that is on them not the soldiers following orders. To the cadet or low level soldier he is following orders that those in charge hand down and hopefully are making the correc…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:34 PM
1

Fair enough. Having a discussion where both parties have communication issues doesn't benefit the discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:24 PM
1

Well I agree with you on most of your points.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:13 PM
2

I never mentioned any "he" or "his". I mentioned what throwaway linked and did a basic summarization of what was going on in the chain after examining it. I know that she is referring to 300 after locating the specific comment throwaway cited.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:12 PM
1

Tyson made no reference that what he stated is the current system we have now. And even then nowhere did he say that the system should or shouldn't be changed only that we imagine a system where the most qualified person is elected regardless of race, sex, creed, sexual preference. Your last sentence about he is making the case that the merit system is what we currently have, which is not true. So please be more specific as to how Tyson's statement is a correlation for today's current system.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 04:00 PM
1

So he is over-generalizing women while mixing in a personal experience to relate to the conclusion/statement. Not a good argument to make when he started out ok previously. It also doesn't help that the post above the statement you just cited was a personal attack to try and discredit his previous statements and label him so as to make him seem irrational/racist/sexist.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 03:42 PM
1

I didn't mention a single Reddit user, I'm summarizing the long chain of comments by multiple users in what the redditor cited. But I can breakdown your arguments and rational if you want me to and helps you think I'm just specifically mentioning you =).
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 03:34 PM
2

He didnt say that. He said "I can't be sure" meaning sexism CAN exist in America, but other reasons for why there aren't as many women holding government positions is possible so he can't make that assumption that sexism is the primary reason for this statistic. Hence "I don't assume either ways" bit.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:52 PM
1

The current system is based on merit?! So please explain Trump winning over Clinton who was much more qualified and how that fits into a merit based system. Our political system isn't about merit it's a big popularity contest (locally and for Congressional seats, President is different.)
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:46 PM
0

Yup she is from NY and possible candidate for President in 2020.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:41 PM
2

There appears to be a lot of miscommunication, context being take out of comments, ad hominem responses to what you cited. Sexism...well maybe in the insults. But merit based systems doesn't mean sexist
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:38 PM
8

Please provide evidence for your hypothesis that because almost all the person's in the army are men = clusterfuck. I'm going to assume you also believe Navy, AirForce, and Marines are applicable was well?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:31 PM
1

So then your saying his analogy is correct as more women in Congress plus mayors and leaders would accomplish more things than current Congress (but then again 20 sloths, 10 turtles, and a mule could be more productive than this current Congress.) Also she does say that more women = more production. Her 1st sentence "half Congress was women" means she wants us to picture a Congress where men and women occupy 50-50 control. Her 2nd sentence "half governor's and mayors were women" is the same thin…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:27 PM
2

Except that the program is made/code written by a human being. It's designed to decide what is right or wrong by the programmer/code writer. I don't get the rebuttal video ban if it contains the same content. If you are making a rebuttal video, than I would expect you to have the original source of what it is your rebutting.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 06:42 PM
3

I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just stating what the end result will be if we keep up with the flag content you don't like stance instead of a "don't watch it if you don't like." Correct Pewdiepie is one of the biggest stars on YouTube. But he isn't immune to this when he got hit with labels of being a Nazi/alt right a while ago. He lost sponsors and media tried to label him in with that group, but any Pewdiepie die-hard will tell you that he isn't alt-right, it's just how he does his bits a…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:55 PM
3

Problem is that if you flag a person's content enough times and have that person "banned" (not literally, but more in the sense that the content he/she produces must be modified to such a way to avoid flagging.) When that happens that person's fans will just flag and remove someone's content that they don't like/agree with. In the end this leads to 2 results... Everything gets destroyed and the business suffers because 2 different sides of users are intentionally flagging/removing content they d…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:24 PM
5

Going to be devil's advocate. It appears that "hate speech" is being used in conjunction with "supremacist content", "religious", "violent extremism". So on the surface this should only apply to KKK, ACTUAL white-supremacist, etc. BUT, of course this can be used as a way to limit and suppress content and opinions that people disagree with. At which point it's only fair to treat such users the same way. One person's opinion is another person's idea of "hate speech."
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:59 PM
42

Penis Illuminati is now the name for my alternative rock band.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:52 PM
1

Agree. Again I love the idea. Some problems will arise though. For example some places won't allow pets/animals (apartment complex, home rental, etc). What about those who can't afford a pet or don't have the time for one (dogs specifically for training) is another problem area. Those are just 2 examples of issues, but if someone doesn't have those problems then yes I encourage someone to adopt a pet to take care of so they don't feel alone/depressed.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:48 PM
4

Good ideas since there is research that having a pet increases happiness and lifespan. The big problem really is men are taught from a young age to not openly discuss their issues/problems or else backlash such as "man up", "being a baby", "quit complaining". So all the affordable healthcare, access to psychologist, hotlines are good but they will be a waste of we don't start telling men that it's ok to discuss their issues and they don't have to face/solve them by himself.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:19 PM
1

So type in "Anti rape awareness College video" on YouTube. I'm sure you'll get plenty of videos where girl goes out to bar, gets drunk, guy sees drunk girl, takes her back to his or her place, takes advantage of her. This is what US college campuses show freshman when they first enter college life as what they view rape/consent as. When I was a freshman I also had to watch/get the same talk just like /u/crimsonkodiak did about the campus policy of consent. Only difference was that the girls were…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:37 PM
6

/u/Seanmrow never mentioned anything about reaping free money to splurge on himself, breaking up with someone and using the kids as an ATM card. He was just pointing out that if 2 people are together, both work, but they want children, then they should discuss the pros and cons before having a child. Whether it is the mother/father working full time, one of them goes to part time, or one wants to stay with the kid until they are old enough to start school where the other parent can go back to wo…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:12 PM
11

"Being kept in a house". Nobody is forcing that person be it man or woman to stay inside. I would assume that they are allowed to leave home when they want to and not have ask permission. But of course there are scum like this, but they are a minority. "Financial freedom to purse whatever interest you." There are plenty of activities that don't require money or are cheap to do. Bird watching, jogging/running, biking, painting, creative writing, poetry, reading, basic exercise, to name a few. You…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:01 PM
1

Millenial here and I agree with ya. To be fair we hate both political parties since we view them as corrupt, caring only for big business/big donors. Obama's best thing was bringing in large amounts of youth into the Democrat base. Problem was when he left and Democrats put up someone who we didn't particularly cared for (Hillary) we didn't show up in the numbers Dems hoped for. We as a voter block are a "we'll go out to vote, if we REALLY like you." The millenial/youth vs traditional Democrats …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:56 AM
1

Oh I can see that to...its one of those perception pictures like the 2 face or a vace, and what colors the dress.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:43 PM
6

Would like to know as well. Dude can easily be a body double for Alan Rickman.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:24 PM
6

not sure if statement about frequency this article is posted or period joke
/r/MensRights14/07/17 03:49 PM
6

First off you just answered your 1st question in your 1st paragraph. N didn't bring up any information for why women deserve more respect for men. So yes we have to presume that N is sexist for preferring women to men because she makes no attempt to counter the argument, only to double down on the "means to an end" in her second post. And we can validate that assumption with her 1st post because she mentions nothing about achieving equality among the sexes which is what feminism says it wants to…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 02:25 PM
4

The first post clearly says that "if you respect women more than men your not a feminist." Now we are missing a few posts before that led up to the 1st post, but we can assume that Oscar is saying that if you like, prefer, respect women more than men than you can't call yourself a feminist since feminism is define as "advocating for the advance of women's rights in order to achieve equality among the sexes" (Google search of feminism). N is only using the 1st half of the Google definition of fem…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:40 PM
2

A movement as defined by Google is "a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, and artistic ideology." I'll agree with you that mgtow doesn't have any political or artistic ideology. So what we have left is social, which it would be called a social ideology. Now I'll admit to putting words in your mouth, but I'll let you explain for yourself but would it be wrong for me to assume that by social movement you define it as the progression of social rights/privileg…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:51 PM
0

If you decide not to show something that is technically a ban. Recently Muslim country's aren't letting the Wonder Woman movie get shown because Gal Gabot is from Israel. That is a ban. The difference between the 2 is Netflix doesn't want it shown because of potential political backlash while the WW ban is purely anti-Israel stances. Companies make decisions either because of how it will effect their profits or how the company will be perceived, which effects there profits. Look at. The Ivanak T…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:21 PM
1

Well if I'm looking up a word to know how to spell it correctly I'll know what it means as well. I thought that's implied when you look something up. And I already mentioned that my 4th grade teacher would force our class to read the dictionary if we got to rowdy. So besides reading the most boring book man has ever created, I've learned that there a words that won't get used outside of extreme circumstances. I really don't get what your trying to get at.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:42 PM
2

If it was reguard the 1st sentence I was being ironic since I use the adjective they're instead of there. Hence why I said "in all seriousness" in the second sentence to illustrate what I've had used a dictionary for.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:15 PM
1

Was taught English, never used a dictionary. So they're goes that idea. But in all serious I didn't use one unless I needed to spell a long word or the teacher wanted to punish the class.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:10 PM
2

Even if she isn't worth much, it's important that he take her to court if he can. Like you said he runs a business and his rape accusation will damage his business that he will either close or ruin the business reputation so it makes it harder to operate/be successful. I'm sure that counts as damages, but I don't know much about Canadian tort law. If he gets found innocent his name is going to be charred and ruined with this pinned to him for the rest of his life. He doesn't have much more to lo…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:13 PM
3

Up until she posts on her social media accounts that she was raped and the college is siding with the rapist. Then the whole media and social media outrage will cause the college to kick him off campus to save face with the public while they figure out if they should close his case against her or just continue to side with her claims to avoid backlash. Remember colleges are businesses, they look out for what is best for them and their interests. They could care less about justice and who is righ…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:02 PM
13

Maybe it's the conspirator in me but I wonder if someone from another sub (possible 2xchrome or feminist) is posting an anti-feminist thread and having the group upvote it mass so that it makes it to all. It allows them to continue the narrative that MensRights is anti-female/sexist. But I guess a better answer is that well drawn out arguments don't draw a ton of people (look at philosophy sub). People want to see something outrageous, commit on it/troll it, than leave. So a KS argument won't ma…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:59 AM
2

I have a rule when I date or take someone out to dinner. If she orders an item that exceeds what I order (which doesn't really happen since I tend to get some of the more pricier foods, but not expensive) she has to pay the difference or at least be the one to leave a tip for the waiter/waitress. If she orders an entree and doesn't share, she pays for the entree.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:48 PM
1

You just touched on something. If it's a parents decision to get circumcision for their kid it's their choice. But if a doctor is doing so automatically or telling the parents the pro/com to influence a decision that's a big issue. I say this as an anti-circumcision btw.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:19 PM
6

You are correct that I don't have kids. But I have a ton of little nieces and nephews that I watch from time to time when parents need adult time. Yes kids mischievous and can easily be lost track of if your not paying attention. That's the key, someone's attention was not focus on the child and on something else. If you have a child that young you MUST be paying attention to them when out in public. Otherwise you get the Cinncy Zoo situation, the Texas mom who left her kids in the car, etc. The…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:24 PM
3

So let's say he does call non emergency. It will take time for the officers to get to the location to help the child. So I'm going to assume that they will tell this man to keep an eye on the kid to make sure she doesn't get hurt until they arrive on scene. Now this fellow is following a 2 year old and focusing in on her while he waits for someone to arrive. That is also going to raise red flags to a lot of people who are seeing this stranger staring at this kid. And I doubt the father is going …
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:46 PM
8

But we come back to the original question. Why was nobody keeping an eye on the child? I don't care if your child is 3 feet or 10 feet from you. Parents should always be aware where their kids are at all times. I don't care how fast a 2 year old can be. Leaving your child alone for only a couple of seconds is dangerous. Thank God that the gentlemen wasn't an actual pedophile cause I'm willing to bet that if he wasn't asking around for where the parents are he could have kidnapped the child quite…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:34 PM
1

But that becomes the problem. When is it a choice and when is it a condition. And are the two clear cut or is it a matter of perception. If the Vanity Fair cover is about embracing ones sexuality than that is their condition. If Emma Watson or some woman agrees to the condition than it's by her choice. If the woman wants to be pictured in a sexual way for her next magazine cover than it's both her choice (to get naked) And condition (magazine must show her being naked or else no buisness). If Va…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:35 PM
1

It's more a problem with subs in general. Subs are biased and mostly made to confirm an individuals opinion/biased. For example if you are anti-Trump it's likely you are subbed to resist and if you are pro your subbed to The Donald. If your anti religion atheist is your sub and if your pro than your subbed to a forum that is pro your religion. The problem becomes when a sub is "neutral" or tries to be. Politics is one example. One would expect politics sub Reddit to be neutral since the title do…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 04:15 PM
2

Please explain how sexist = stupidity. I would very much like to see the correlation/causation between the 2.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 02:47 PM
2

Problem is 3rd wave feminist use the idea of women to further their own goals (an individuals goals not feminist movement in general). While yes they want women to have a choice, they are also against it for other women. I'm not going to call them hypocritical but they are inconsistent with their ideology. Not to mention 3rd wave has made feminism into a commercialization ideology (thats a whole another argument.) Emma Watson is a good example. In the past she used to be against women being port…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:24 PM
2

I'm a bit late but I'm still willing to do a couple of questions if the Q&A is still open.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 09:09 PM
2

Really? Cause they are now saying he held his seat just moments ago.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:39 AM
1

Not really. She joins MRA to infiltrate and get dirt on members while posing as a changed person who wants to learn more. She gets a documentary made basically saying that she has proof that MRAs are sexist because some members made certain statements about women. This validates her followers/die hard feminist viewpoints and they applaud her for infiltrating and exposing MRA for what they truly are and get all the positive media coverage. It would also become a counter point to the Red Pill and …
/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:18 AM
17

Actions speak louder than words. If she does actually "pull back the curtain" on her viewpoints than sure why not. But if this is an attempt to remain popular or try and capitalize on the Red Pills success with creating her own version of MRA than the door is shut permanently. Sometimes skeptism can be good but time will tell.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:59 PM
2

The argument is that why should a company that does business tell the public that certain groups that they can't see or do business in their establishment? WW fights bad guys, stands up for truth, justice, honor, good, etc. All those things aren't gender specific. Men and Women like a hero and take inspiration from them even if they aren't the same gender. Would it be ok for a company to refuse to admit adults to see the new Spider-Man since Peter Parker is a teen? Or say not let women see it be…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 04:42 PM
2

Man beats women in top cleaner of the month "Sexist that the woman didn't win" Woman beats man for top cleaner of the month "Sexist cause men don't want to clean and rather let a woman to clean up after him."
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:58 PM
2

Except "teens will be teens" is gender neutral unless you want to make transgenders unhappy.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:38 PM
1

TIL Feminism has more brands than Lays Potato Chip flavors.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:54 PM
8

The issue here is the double standards that it is ok for a women to discriminate against a man's height (by discriminate I mean make fun of the idea that a short guy is disgusting) but yet if man makes a similar comment about her weight or physical characteristics it's sexist/an insult. This is what the argument in the right section is about.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 04:21 PM
3

Oh I know 5 year olds are animals. I was one in the past. When a kid first enters kindergarten (at least here in US) they are going from a world where they are the center of attention to basically another pea in the pod. So there is going to be issues between not just boys vs girls, but boys vs boys and girls vs girls. So fights, arguments, tantrums should be expected when they first enter a school system. As they procede through the school year they learn certain norms (i.e don't touch others i…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:13 AM
10

You send your kids to get an education, learn about science/math/history, and get them to think critically. Schools shouldn't be used to socialize kids cause this shouldn't be the reason parents send their kids to school. Plus they are kids, they care more about playing with toys, doing their homework (I hope so), and enjoy learning new things and ideas; they don't want/care about social engineering them that because some people don't want to play with certain things that you shouldn't be able t…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:39 PM
2

I'll try to clarify it better. I think he ment to say that feminism promotes gender equality in principle but to put equality in action is much tougher due to personal preferences (i.e boys want lego, girls want dolls from this story), biological (girls don't want to play physical contact sports with guys cause they stand a greater chance at suffering a major injury), etc. So while the teacher wanted girls to start playing with lego, girls didn't havr interest in doing so. The same would happen …
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:31 PM
1

Good points. Since I wasn't at the Birmingham screening and there to hear that person's response i won't touch your point in much detail. I will however state that I hope his response didn't receive any praise or a melancholy reaction. But given the problems that the UK has with treating males compared to here in the states, I would be surprised if he had jumped to such a conclusion. The problem is that SJW have taken up the mantle of being anti-male (white male specifically.) So while I agree t…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 04:02 PM
3

Couple of points. It's hard to have a rationale discussion about Men's Issues when the other side doesn't want to discuss, argues along the lines of "even if this issues do exist they are not as bad as women", and/or they start using the Privilage argument. Men's Issues will NEVER be apart of the SJW ideogy because they care to argue more in favor of homosexuals, transgender, women, minorities. So white males and even some black males who don't wish to put the color of their skin before their be…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter