TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Panderjit_SinghVV Archive

View 0 posts and 638 comments by Panderjit_SinghVV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You can't have your cake and eat it too. They shouldn’t be able to but they do and are awfully smug about it too.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 06:40 PM
51

Female conscripts would gobble up all the relatively safe, non-combat, roles meaning the odds of death or injury for every man are increased.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:24 PM
8

"...what happened to you..." What a despicable woman. She’s obviously still a danger to the public and should be locked up.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:42 PM
15

Feminists stripped men of fundamental human rights in many western nations, literally making them second class citizens. Dismissing objections to that as saltiness is hate speech. Canada is a good example: prior to the feminist Constitution Act of 1982 every person had the right to be free of sexual discrimination, afterward only females had that right.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 10:23 PM
11

I’d say everything was based on physical necessity until men developed reliable hormonal birth control which allowed women at least to control their own reproductive destiny. And women did better than men out of the deal before and after. It was a societal requirement that women be well looked after.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 10:19 PM
1

It’s incredibly offensive to use the term "black people" when you mean "African people". There are a great many wonderful non-African people of far blacker colour than many Africans and they do not want to be lumped in with Africans.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:25 PM
4

Female circumcision happens in foreign lands; they are entitled to their culture and it’s not our place to ‘correct’ them. Circumcision of infant men is routinely practiced for mercenary reasons in the heart of the western world and so is ours to judge and correct.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:19 PM
8

You’re arguing hate speech "directed at minorities" is the real problem even though Facebook didn’t find much of it. Always inversion with you people.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:01 PM
10

Everywhere else in the world is for women; why come and taint this one place men have?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:39 PM
1

strong response to a post that has 4 short paragraphs about a life changing event involving 2 people We can take the information we have as valid or we can assume OP is at fault because he’s a man. People here generally aren’t anti-male bigots so we assume OP isn’t lying.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:24 PM
3

How do human minds get so broken? OP’s situation is the opposite of what you describe but you say he sounds like your ex.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:11 PM
3

That’s your bigotry talking. God help the people who have to interact with you but aren’t exactly like you.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:10 PM
3

That’s what I think too. It could easily be a ruse so one must assume it is.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:33 PM
3

Need to carefully document any financial moves. She may be trying to trick him into actions she can later portray as "financial abuse" and "controlling behaviour". She might agree to closing joint accounts now but in court she may be wailing "He knew I had no income because I was in school and he cut off my access to our money".
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:32 PM
5

life is unfair for women with kids Unfair in that they are treated better than others.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:22 PM
1

I wouldn’t say that. Until men invented reliable birth control and feminists twisted the justice system women benefited most of all from monogamy. They needed someone to provide for them throughout their childbearing years at least.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:18 PM
7

It’s not over yet... once she gets a divorce lawyer she’ll get greedy.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:15 PM
3

In the past men were usually given custody because they could provide for the essential needs and women could not. In the present women are given custody and the courts ensure that the man still provides for the essential needs even though women easily can. There’s never been a time when divorce outcomes justified thinking poorly of men and celebrating women.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:02 PM
1

She’s finishing school and believes she’s on track to conquer corporate America now. She sees an exciting new future for herself and wants to go grab it with that hot, young, grad student she’s been screwing.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:54 PM
6

Her divorce lawyer will likely convince her to demand custody if only because it means far more support income. And convince her to make false abuse claims because those are a very powerful bargaining tool.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:51 PM
3

Presumably he’ll be pauperised to keep her in the manner to which she’s become accustomed.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:35 PM
3

Deny what the evidence presented indicates and instead imagine a scenario where the victim is evil. Perfect example of how the endless anti-male propaganda wrongly influences some people’s thoughts.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:33 PM
22

In many jurisdictions sex discrimination against men is perfectly legal. In Canada for example only females have the right to be free of sex discrimination and only non-Europeans have the right to be free from race discrimination. So says the highest law in the land, the Constitution Act of 1982. Before that feminist legislation everyone had those rights.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:08 PM
2

Technically you can use force to defend yourself or others from an imminent or ongoing attack but in many jurisdictions (Duluth Model jurisdictions where the policy is to arrest the man regardless of circumstance) doing so will put you in jail. Even discussing your abuse at the hands of a female can put you in jail since social workers, doctors, etc are legally obligated to report domestic abuse to police. They are required to report it to police and police are obligated to arrest the man.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:07 PM
5

Modern society, as always, is built on the hard work, sacrifice, and suffering of men. If people empathize too much with men the very foundation of civilisation is put at risk.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:10 PM
41

Most of that 25% will likely be housed homeless... there is a difference between homeless and unhoused. Female homeless are far more likely to be housed than men.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 03:46 PM
28

In 1981 feminists passed The Constitution Act which included a Charter of Rights and Freedoms that removed from men the right to be free of sex discrimination. That’s the highest law in the country.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:09 PM
4

Men are far more empathetic than females. Why do you think they beat themselves half to death providing for others? You’ve been poisoned by feminism if you think being a man means being unempathetic.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:53 PM
2

| "unable to understand my own or other's feelings" I find it hard to believe many men said that. But it does very conveniently play into the feminist hate idea that men are broken women and can be fixed by becoming more like women.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:48 PM
7

Incredible. No gate-keeping but also no (what you consider) ‘misogyny’, and no (what you consider) racism. The inconsistency is so stark you must be a feminist.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:06 PM
15

Show me the legislation and policy that MRAs write to harm women... It’s bad apples on one side that have massive power and use it to harm one sex group.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:59 PM
18

| I do not believe women are the oppressors of men Feminists write legislation and policy that actively discriminates again men causing significant, intentional harm to large numbers of men. Most of those feminists are female.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:56 PM
14

Used to be that most military jobs were non-combat and so most draftees had a good chance of escaping the most dangerous roles. Female draftees would be given all the safer support roles forcing more men into combat.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 08:15 PM
3

I judge people by their actions not their words. Feminist legislation and policy overwhelmingly harms men, makes men second class citizens. That’s not acceptable to me.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:59 PM
4

It’s legal to sexually discriminate against men in Canada and is accepted and common practice in other western nations. Women get discrimination in their favour. That is more important than trying to ‘fix’ alien cultures. If Muslims want to prevent women driving that’s not my business.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:52 PM
12

CDC at least has now changed their definition of vaccine to remove mention if provision of immunity. So today they are vaccines but a year ago they weren’t.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:16 PM
98

An open crime against humanity. The International Criminal Court should act. No, I’m not being hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:14 PM
1

you shouldn’t care about the few men that suffer that kind of thing I don’t understand this. Men are heavily discriminated against, it’s so accepted in my country that feminists legalised it. Why isn’t that something to care about?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:27 PM
45

Pretty funny how they happily deny reality even after raising it themselves. People are sexually maturing more quickly than in the past, especially females. Menarcheal age has been dropping for decades.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:14 AM
1

Perhaps in the USA but not so in much of Europe and Canada.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 06:36 PM
3

Hmmm. I’m going to have to think about that analogy.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:05 PM
4

Other ethnicities come in with nothing and do very well...
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:01 PM
0

Their willingness and ability to get away with using the statistical data however is sexist. They would not try to or get away with using stats that showed significantly different risk for say Japanese than Swedes.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:16 PM
1

it’s just math and money Yes it is but they wouldn’t dare do the same with regard to ethnicity regardless of what the data might support.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:13 PM
21

Decades of affirmative action and the women still aren’t making significant contributions. They are killing scientific progress.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 12:41 AM
2

A higher proportion of men are in the work force so there’s no justification for insisting women be 50% of any occupation. And of course there is never an excuse for sexually discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 12:07 AM
11

She’s a transphobe; women can have penises.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 11:00 AM
22

Could be the start of a campaign to remove you from the workplace. They’re probably building a documentary record of your ‘misogynistic attacks on women’s right to bodily autonomy’... If it’s mentioned in your next performance review you are almost certainly on your way out.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 10:54 AM
9

Boycotts are a form of feedback, of constructive criticism. Boycotting businesses tells them they need to correct their behaviour. It’s a kind and generous action.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:41 PM
7

History isn’t what you’ve been programmed to believe. It’s more than a few hundred years of interaction between the USA and African slave traders.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:37 PM
9

It’s completely correct but contrary to your programming; is that what you mean?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:35 PM
33

women do make up the vast majority of readers That’s a recent and engineered development. It’s not something that just happened, it’s something that was done intentionally to harm men. A group that doesn’t read, doesn’t get university degrees, has a very difficult time asserting its rights and protecting its interests.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:29 PM
25

But it’s something that’s been deliberately changed through feminist hate and discrimination programs. Just as men are being deliberately pushed out of higher education, politics, and even basic literacy it’s all an intentional disempowerment.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:26 PM
3

We won’t be laughing when the odds of a man being injured or killed at war increase significantly because drafted females grab all the safer non-combat roles.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 08:57 PM
6

Men pulled women along as the species evolved and society developed.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 08:54 PM
0

Far more than men women earn by having an attractive body. It’s always an option for them if they decide accepting an affirmative action job is too demanding. It makes far more sense to criticize a woman’s attractiveness because it is more often important to their ability to live a comfortable life.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 09:52 PM
18

Women learn in grade school that they can get away with anything they like so long as they complain to teacher before their victim does and falsely claim he did what she actually did. She may already have filed complaints with HR against all the men she attacked so any claim they make will appear to be mere retaliation.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 07:12 PM
2

The proper action is for the trolling feminist to be banned. It’s in every thread actively derailing conversation.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:57 PM
3

Trying to imagine a world in which a book critical of females could be both published and selected by a major bookshop... Nope. I can’t imagine it.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:55 PM
2

Upshot: I don't have a dog in this race, and neither does most of this sub IMO. Since we’re deciding what is and isn’t of concern to others I’ve decided you do in fact have a dog in this race. Several in fact.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:53 PM
3

Aren’t three year old children more likely to be abused by a woman who knows them than by a strange man? Haven’t looked at the stats for years but I seem to recall that being the case. Her bigotry and hatred is putting children at risk. Sounds like social work is the last place she should be.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:55 PM
7

It’s a feminist disruptor at work. They really ought to be barred.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:10 PM
16

It’s just mean-spirited derailment by a feminist and not anything like a sincere contribution. They’re desperate to distract attention from men’s issues. I think people who do little other than defend feminism have no place here. It adds nothing and silences real discussion.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:06 PM
2

Trouble is feminists are in every thread here doing their derailing of discussion and you’ve said exactly what at least some feminists say. There is nothing distinguishing your comment from actual feminist ‘thought’.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:03 PM
6

I’m responsible for my own safety. Women can take responsibility for themselves. They are at significantly lower risk so it ought to be easier.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:59 PM
5

Yes it’s bad. The feminists should stop being sexist. I think we all agree on that.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:56 PM
4

Perhaps in his life it’s the women who suffer most because they are within range of his fists. He knows he doesn’t attack men so assumes all men are like him.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:54 PM
5

Most violence is by people with dark hair. Does it matter that most victims have dark hair as well? No it doesn’t. It’s simply an observation and a distraction. Why distract from the issue?
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:47 PM
5

If you manage to quell the aggression and violence in men in western countries they will be replaced by far more aggressive and violent men from abroad. Working with feminists is out of the question as they are at war with men. I’ve been beaten, mugged, sexually assaulted, burgled, and home invaded by criminals but that’s orders of magnitude less harm than that done by feminists.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:45 PM
26

Women correctly do feel safe and protected. They are far safer from crime and violence than men. That’s why they get so outraged on the rare occasion one of their own gets hurt. The Sarah Everard case in the UK is a good example: the uproar was deafening because a young middle class woman was killed.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:41 PM
1

Never heard an alt-right person say the high African murder rate isn’t a problem because most of their victims are African. I suspect you’ve made that up.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:06 AM
2

If you find yourself agreeing with a feminist they are probably lying.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:19 PM
7

All the resources must go to women via feminists. They can’t parlay their gender studies degree into a comfy job if men are victims too.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 02:46 PM
1

That rational thinking is patriarchal and white supremacist. She ‘knows in her vagina’ what the Truth is.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:54 PM
1

They confuse some aspects of their privilege for harassment. They are so pampered having a man look them in the eye seems an affront.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:52 PM
6

Those are distractions. Pretend issues meant to hide the real problem. Fundamental human rights for men are the issue; everything else flows from that.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 05:28 PM
7

Women are a hyper-privileged group and should be mocked whenever they assert their privilege. Counter mocking is punching down; feminist SOP.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 05:24 PM
4

It’s perfectly okay to laugh at people and to refuse their commands. We are free people not slaves.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 04:59 PM
11

Systemic and widespread sex discrimination are not fringe cases.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 04:47 PM
3

Exactly. Conformity is the enemy of progress. Actual progress I mean. We’d still be small tree-dwelling primates if females had their way.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:30 PM
4

That’s how we got where we are now. Ask any scapegoat demographic and you’ll hear the same story from the survivors: "We didn’t believe it was that bad. We didn’t think it could happen here. We thought if we kept quiet they’d leave us alone. We thought if we helped them abuse our comrades they’d let us escape."
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:23 PM
0

Feminist hate campaigns and discrimination drove men out of academia. You’re doing the equivalent of defending censorship of Jews by the Germans in 1940; By then they’d driven many Jews out already so they weren’t around to be censored. But you know that and are just being disingenuous in order to disrupt discussion. Are you getting course credit for your hate fueled trolling?
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:19 PM
3

Then deduct the POCs and the left wing extremists and you have the few who are censored.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:16 PM
1

The only people calling for and enforcing censorship are the ‘left wing’. The only hate is coming from the same people. Who calls for silencing and even extermination of their political opponents? Only the ‘left’.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:14 PM
2

I bet I know how it breaks down by race and sex.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:11 PM
19

Is she the one that drove her own son to suicide with her sexist hate and still mocked male suicide? I know it was one of the powerful UK feminists.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:33 PM
85

Did they apologize to the boys as well? In front of the girls?
/r/MensRights07/10/21 12:18 AM
3

Do you accept that women know things ‘in their vagina’ as the boss of the USA National Organization of Women famously claimed?
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:40 AM
3

Probably a student and she gets course credit for disrupting discussion of men’s issues.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:14 PM
2

That’s in no way a summary of the post. Do you just intend to disrupt discussion with obvious lies? Are you paid to disrupt here? Given course credit or money?
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:06 PM
11

I’ve been studying feminism since the early 80s. They’ve been extremists generating hate propaganda and making discriminatory legislation and policy for at least forty years. All you need to know is that it’s legal and encouraged to discriminate against the men in your class simply for being men. And feminists created that situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:39 AM
1

Fleabag was hilarious so I’m still hopeful for the Bond film.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 10:37 AM
1

And she hates baseball.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:15 PM
1

Driving has measurable outcomes. Drivers have to perform. Women don’t want that sort of accountability.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:38 PM
2

Strangely he didn’t immediately shut up and sit down, resigning whatever position he holds that put him on stage with a microphone to chide other men.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:29 PM
1

What I dislike about feminism is the sexually discriminatory legislation and policy they create.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 06:12 PM
2

And the wives mostly celebrate when the (ex) husband dies in harness. More sweet, sweet cash for them and without the burden of having a ‘pig’ around.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 05:48 PM
5

Standard feminist action intended to disrupt men’s discussions. They simply can’t stand any scrutiny by non-feminists.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 05:45 PM
4

It’s legal in my country to racially discriminate against Europeans but not against Africans or Asians. The only systemic racism in western nations is against Europeans.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 05:19 PM
5

The police interrogation of the Toronto incel mass murderer is available on YouTube. He’s very open about participating in self-labeled incel forums and claims to have been communicating with the Isla Vista incel mass killer. So it’s hard to deny that some incel forums have radicalised killers. But that’s a tiny fraction of inceldom. Mostly it’s just frustrated leftover men.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:39 PM
3

My first exposure to the incel concept was a film about a European nation that pays for handicapped men to visit prostitutes. These are men who are involuntarily celibate because of various physical and mental illnesses and handicaps. Nothing toxic or "misogynistic" about them.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:55 PM
6

I think Edmund Kemper said he hated women and he certainly acted as if he did. He’s what I consider a misogynist.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:36 PM
11

Good point. Discrimination against men based on sex is widely encouraged and even legal in many western nations. In Canada it’s even in the Constitution.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:33 PM
2

The stronger feminists become the more likely Islam conquers. At that point the feminists immediately quit their games and assume roles assigned by the caliph.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:56 PM
4

That sex discrimination against men is both accepted and often legal in many western nations is the biggest issue in my view. Without equal fundamental legal rights men can never be equal participants in society and will steadily lose representation and further rights.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 01:54 AM
7

Aren’t you tired of being penalized for the sake of woman? For their convenience? Unisex toilets mean men wait longer and women wait less because efficient users (men) are now mixed into the queue of inefficient users. And if waiting longer is no big deal then the women can put up with it. That’s only fair since their inefficiency is what causes the waiting.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:27 PM
5

What makes no sense is penalizing a more efficient group by increasing their wait times for the benefit of less efficient users. Let’s work on teaching women to be more efficient before we burden men even further.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:17 PM
7

We don’t know her motivation. She may have been a pedo on the prowl, or intentionally demeaning men out of feminist hatred, or just hyper-entitled.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:14 PM
9

Where do you tie your horse when you’re busy performing your chivalrous duties here?
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:09 PM
75

We don’t know her motivation. She may well have been a pedophile hoping to find a child on his own in there. She certainly seemed to have the idea of seeing male genitals very much on her mind: that was all she talked about.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:08 PM
10

A single episode may not seem important but widespread implementation of unisex toilets transfers the benefit of men’s efficient use of toilet facilities to an intentionally less efficient group. Women don’t need to chat and primp in toilets causing those lines to build. I say we teach women to be less vain and gossipy rather than harming men yet again for their benefit.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 04:04 PM
95

That’s it: not deserving of privacy or to dignity. This is the outcome of decades of hate propaganda ‘othering’ men.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 03:58 PM
-1

Separate facilities are appropriate where one group is significantly less efficient in their use of those facilities. Why should one class of people have the benefit of their efficiency transferred without compensation to another less efficient group?
/r/MensRights08/09/21 03:49 PM
3

As well as doing most of the necessary work men create the science and technology that make comfortable modern life possible. Despite decades of intense efforts to educate and empower females they still haven’t made a significant contribution to moving society forward.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 03:14 PM
14

In private they likely are very pleased. It’s a victory for them. They hate men and work to spread that hatred.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 01:12 PM
1

Advocate for equality. Sex discrimination against men is legal and encouraged in many nations.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 01:20 PM
4

That they deserve to be punished for social arrangements of the past and so it’s okay to sexually discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:56 PM
1

I’d like to see the distribution of combat roles.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:48 PM
1

That would make matters even worse for the men because the women would take the vast majority of the safer, non-combat, jobs.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:47 PM
3

They call it the poverty draft.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 04:45 PM
2

Knock me down, leap on me, and start to strangle me. Ass pinched on a public street hard enough to leave a bruise. Etc.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 06:03 PM
9

As usual what the feminists say is nearer the opposite of the truth. The vast majority of men treat women as more human than they do other men. They bend over backward to help and protect women, to make the woman’s life better than their own.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/21 02:04 PM
5

Easy for feminists to cite a source for their paranoia induced persecution theories after decades of phony research in Women’s Studies etc. departments. At the same time men have been driven out of universities and so there is less and less real, relatively unbiased, research being done.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:39 PM
8

Comparing feminists & MRAs simply doesn’t make sense. Feminism is a century old, extremely powerful, extremely successful, anti-egalitarian movement. MRA is none of those things. Because feminism is powerful we have to evaluate it based on the actions of its powerful members rather than the propaganda inspired beliefs of its lesser members. We have to judge based on boardroom feminists not bedroom feminists. There are no boardroom MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:39 PM
13

But feminism is pro sex discrimination which is anti-egalitarian. Being both just makes you naive or confused.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:37 PM
5

You’re lucky she didn’t hit you and she may tell people you hit her.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:13 PM
0

I know of two: Isla Vista, and Toronto. But that’s insignificant next to violence and murder done by for example Dems in the USA. A year of riots, looting, and arson. Thirty or more assassinations of police officers. Mass shooting attack on Republican senators. Fire bombing of an opposition campaign office. Etc.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:11 PM
4

Feminists have used bomb attacks throughout their history. As recently as the 80s where I live. They’ve only stopped because they now have enormous power over policy and can wreak havoc much more effectively.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 12:31 PM
1

In other words when you remove cases where a female is the abuser most abusers are men.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:32 PM
7

NDP are even more anti-man than the others. Very strong supporters of sex and race discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:57 PM
23

Trudeau was literally raised in mansions & limousines but calls other men privileged and working men a threat to the community.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:55 PM
-6

Generally I support eugenics but that’s dysgenic. Men created and maintain the modern world. Without men civilisation dies.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/21 05:01 PM
38

It’s very easy to demonstrate systemic discrimination in some countries. In Canada for example the Constitution only protects females from sex discrimination. That’s the highest law in the land and effectively impossible to correct. If course people still deny it.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:29 PM
9

But people do listen to them. Feminists write government and corporate policies.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/08/21 08:26 PM
11

MRAs generally are egalitarians. They want men to have equal rights. Feminists want and have superior rights for females. It’s perfectly appropriate to feel animosity towards those who’ve made you a second class citizen legally and socially. If you don’t recognize that men are second class citizens you are ill informed and it’s not my job to educate you.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 08:18 PM
3

Yet it’s a relatively new idea. It certainly wasn’t commonly believed that females are more intelligent than men until feminists started creating that new reality with propaganda and active bigotry.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:52 PM
2

girls do physically mature (including brain development) a few years earlier than boys And beaujolais matures faster than cabernet sauvignon. Mature is a relative term.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:49 PM
3

Or sometimes not responsible. A woman here stole a car, drove drunk on the wrong side of the highway, and killed a man. Suspended sentence because, according to the judge’s own statement, she cried during the trial.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:24 PM
1

Don’t waste your time. That guy’s never had a thought that didn’t come out of a woke propaganda mill. His views are in rigid compliance with the status quo, the state, and the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:51 PM
2

Don’t waste your time. She’s only here to disrupt. She even signaled it when she parroted a well-known hate monger feminist infamous for shutting down men’s real attempts to improve their situation... "Cry me a river" is a reference to the despicable ‘Big Red’.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:06 PM
2

They aren’t doing you a favor by coming into vanishingly rare men’s spaces to disrupt discussion and spread hate. If they thought they were helping they wouldn’t do it.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:01 PM
1

In many western countries females have more rights than men and feminists work to exacerbate that. Feminists do not work for equality but against it.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:57 PM
1

Rule One: never believe anything a feminist says. They are expert and highly experienced liars and propagandists (and you pay to train them and to produce their hate propaganda). Men are significantly more often victims of violence than women.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:55 PM
1

The entire world doesn’t have to be dedicated to fixing female problems. The overwhelming majority of it is already; surely we can have a few online places where we don’t need to mindlessly parrot feminist hate propaganda.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:59 PM
2

So many men are terrified of just criticism of women and feminists. Their decades of propaganda have been effective. Too many believe any criticism no matter how just and accurate is hate, misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:57 PM
1

It’s like saying a Nazi rights group is just the same as a please-don’t-genocide-us group. Females are privileged over men in western societies. In some they literally have greater constitutional rights. Feminists are hatred driven oppressors.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:54 PM
2

People justly and accurately describe sexist policy, laws, and actions against men. Some are taken by feminists, some by women in general. It’s perfectly fine to criticize feminists and women. They can’t become better people if nobody’s tells them where they are going wrong.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:50 PM
1

Not only that but those around you are protected too.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:47 PM
9

They already cut off banking services to political dissidents. They already target funding, shutting down crowd-funding, harassing and threatening advertisers etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:30 PM
10

Legal sex discrimination against men in many western nations is extremely bad. It means over time fewer and fewer educated men, fewer and fewer men in positions of institutional power. Men become less able to defend, and to recover, their rights as feminist discrimination programs continue to operate.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:27 PM
3

They are actively working on that... I recall reading a feminist article calling for women to starve their boy children. And of course we’ve all seen their advice that women abort boy fetuses.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:14 PM
7

Feminists do say those things about men. With not only complete impunity but with the reward of lucrative academic/activist careers, public accolades, and billions in funding for sexist policy.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:44 PM
9

It doesn’t imply all females at all. You can pretend it does but it doesn’t. Just as "the Dutch are the tallest Europeans" doesn’t imply all Dutch are taller than all other Europeans. But you know that already.
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 04:09 PM
7

no-one's business but my own Nearly a quote from one of my favorite songs, ‘Nobody’s Business’ by Peter Tosh.
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 04:04 PM
1

It’s perfectly fine to criticize both individual females and females as a group. How can they learn to be better people if nobody can tell them what they are doing wrong? You do want females to be better don’t you?
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 04:00 PM
1

Your post is not a fact.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 08:46 PM
25

The law is perfectly happy to let a female claim any man is the father with no evidence at all so they can’t reasonably be concerned about proof in this scenario.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 11:38 AM
13

Don’t get too comfortable. They’ll come for you anytime they deem it necessary.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:39 PM
181

She needn’t worry. Serving in the military is far better for females than for men. Safe comfortable jobs (unless they desperately want otherwise), less rigorous training and overall requirements, fast easy promotion. They get all the benefits of having served with minimal risk.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:38 PM
14

It is enforced though. Try not registering and see what happens. Rule 1: feminists almost always lie so you should never believe anything they say.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:33 PM
15

Men are punished in numerous ways if they fail to register. It’s real, active, law that harms men in measurable real world ways. Please stop derailing conversation here with your feminist hate.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:32 PM
16

The president of Canada Trudeau said that working men are a threat to their community. Incredible what he gets away with.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:47 PM
10

Men design pretty good systems; it would take longer than a week for things to fall apart. I think grocery stores start running dry after a few days but lack of food won’t have much impact in a week. Water, power, sewage systems would break down slowly.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:46 PM
14

These disrupting feminists ought to be banned. They come here only to disrupt the conversation. They are motivated by hatred.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:02 AM
11

Your presence here disrupting a pro-men space with feminist inspired hate proves his point.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:00 AM
5

It’s okay to criticise women both individually and as a group.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:58 AM
2

If it’s abolished that just makes it a bit slower to ramp up when the time comes. The state will always force people into service if they decide it’s necessary. But I agree the current registration system and its penalties should be ended.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:11 PM
3

Exactly. The females will be given the safer jobs and as a result a higher proportion of the men will get dangerous combat roles. And so providing ‘equality’ for females will once again be paid for in men’s blood.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:06 PM
3

Is she the one who drove her own son to suicide and commented that suicide is one of the few things men do well?
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:10 AM
2

Africans are not being asked anything different than anybody else.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:59 AM
6

Africans are not being asked anything different than anybody else.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:58 AM
6

They abort the ‘bad’ children.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:05 PM
3

Oh boy. End war by being conquered by China.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:24 PM
2

Wonder what the results have been? Almost certainly greater risk and harm to the men. They almost certainly are not putting women in as much danger as often.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:23 PM
2

Some small proportion of military jobs involve combat the rest are relatively safe support positions. Every female conscripted will be given a safe(r) job and force another conscripted man into the firing line.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:13 PM
12

Isn’t it already valid to withdraw consent at anytime other than after the fact? It certainly ought to be provided the withdrawal is clearly communicated.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:01 AM
53

It is legal in my country to sexually discriminate against men but not against women. It used to be illegal to sexually discriminate against anyone but feminists rewrote the laws in order to permit attacks on men. This results in extensive discrimination against men in education and employment.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:22 PM
10

Feminist anti-man discrimination doesn’t exist in your part of the UK? No female-only shortlists for jobs, political positions? No extra exam time for female students? No female only scholarships? Equal spending on men’s health? Etc?
/r/MGTOW217/07/21 05:39 PM
0

In the 80s in Canada a Royal Commission traveled the country investigating public preferences regarding sex work & pornography. Unsurprisingly the people overwhelmingly wanted decriminalization or legalization. Unsurprisingly the government ignored the findings completely. Street prostitution continued and a pig farmer named Pickton (with help from a biker gang) found it possible to torture murder fifty prostitutes before anyone noticed and stopped them. That was just one city...
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:54 PM
2

I used to sleep with a woman over fifty. Highly skilled and stunning. Watching her walk naked across a room was delightful. Dangerous psychotic as it turned out but that’s life.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:39 PM
1

Sweden of all places. The source of hardcore porn and softcore age inappropriate media (Naturist mags and films) in the 70s.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:35 PM
10

Maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t. Obviously feminists are infamous for making things up, faking research, but superficially it’s plausible that there is an increase in drunkenness during sports events and a related increase in violence. I’d expect there to be more bar and street violence as well.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:15 PM
-5

Witchery was a very serious crime at the time. There are plenty of women around today who are witches so why not back then? Don’t do the crime if you cant do the time (even if you have a vagina). Being a witch is just like being a Catholic, or a Muslim. It only means a person believes in a given religion not that that religion is factually correct.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 03:46 AM
7

Do women face negative sexism in high tech? Demonstrate it. It sounds like you just want your own slice of the diversity discrimination pie. If you support sex, race, or sex preference discrimination you are on the wrong side.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:45 AM
8

Certainly the ‘male gaze’ is a mainstay of feminist propaganda and said to be connected to sexual violence. Other feminists argue that all heterosexual sex is rape because women cannot form consent in a patriarchy. Feminism is defined by academic feminism and the legislation and policy it generates. What the average self-described feminist thinks is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:39 AM
3

They are trying to support another of their hate-filled lies: that women often cannot truly consent to sex with men. It’s always non consensual because there is an implicit death threat whenever a man initiates sex. Got to pump up those rape conviction numbers. Again it’s circular and supports other feminist lies.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:53 PM
7

It’s worse than that. Policy based on the Duluth model requires the hypothetically more dangerous partner to be removed regardless of the details of the incident. That means the man gets arrested as that’s the only way to force him out. He’s assumed to be more dangerous because the stats show more men arrested for DV... it’s self-supporting rational.
/r/MGTOW210/07/21 04:46 PM
1

If say 20 percent of women don’t want to work outside the home should females still be 50% of senior management? What about specific groups like Pakistani women who overwhelmingly want to be stay-at-home mothers? Should they have ‘equal representation’?
/r/MensRights09/07/21 03:50 PM
1

This is obvious trolling. These feminists disrupt the forum and should be banned.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 03:40 PM
8

Incel mass murders? Only two I know of: that Chinese guy in California and the Iraqi guy in Toronto. Not a significant problem. Urban youths with illegal pistols kill more people every day.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:59 PM
5

I classify as feminist anyone who deliberately harms men as a group because they are men.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:56 PM
15

Because he’s a bigot. People don’t support bigotry.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:37 PM
4

With a bigot? What’s the point?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:34 PM
4

She’s a rage fueled bigot. Ignore him.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:33 PM
7

This is not a feminist safe space. Bigotry and lies are unwelcome here.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:32 PM
7

Men do not "get their own" anything. It’s illegal and the law is enforced. I don’t understand why people make claims like that. We all know it’s a lie. Why say it?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:30 PM
5

It seems trivial but all the hate propaganda adds up. Men are now only 45 percent of college students and so have significantly less cultural power than 40 years ago. Men and women now believe that men are significantly less intelligent than women. They just keep spewing hatred and men’s lives deteriorate.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:57 PM
17

She’s still in training... Next time she’ll kick you, burst into tears, and run to the office saying you kicked her.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:27 PM
2

Sadly something seems to be broken in your brain already. Why do you form and express an opinion on something you know you have no experience with?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 03:41 PM
-8

Sharing recreational drugs with lovers is not rape despite whatever redefining campaigns feminists operate. Quaaludes have been out of production so long most don’t understand they were used as a recreational drug. If Cosby is a rapist so is everyone who ever shared a bottle of wine or a joint with someone they had sex with.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:27 AM
3

It’s nonconsensual sexual mutilation regardless of who says ‘go ahead, pin him down and cut him’.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 10:48 PM
-1

Only the man is financially liable at any point. The female can dump the child in a designated dumping place, adopt it out, keep it and make the state pay. The man can only pay or go to prison. The nearest we can get to equal rights in this case is to also allow the father to financially abandon the child.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 10:41 PM
3

As I recall the only evidence was that Cosby shared recreational drugs with people he went on to have sex with. Feminists may have managed to redefine that as rape in the minds of some but if it is who among us would be innocent?
/r/MensRights30/06/21 10:02 PM
2

A mind reader! Do you know what I’m thinking now?
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:43 AM
3

It wasn’t used that way at all but feminists have convinced you it has. Ask for proof.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:39 AM
3

May have been the admin women. They know that sort of thing often works. It happened where I worked long ago. The clerical staff were given wage parity with those who do heavy and debilitating labour often in torrential rain.
/r/MGTOW224/06/21 01:15 PM
14

The world couldn’t keep functioning if men were afforded the same consideration as others. Ours is but to do and die.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 06:12 PM
5

Ask her.
/r/MGTOW213/06/21 08:46 AM
8

She thinks men are broken women and demands they become more like women to work around her failure to work with the clients as they actually are.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 05:04 PM
4

If your techniques don’t work for your clients you demand your clients change? Why don’t you develop some new techniques that do work? Not as easy as just blaming men and doing nothing I suppose.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 04:59 PM
2

No way to help men? It’s all their fault and that’s all there is to say? You are a feminist. Equal rights would improve men’s lives greatly. An end to feminist hate propaganda and anti-man action would improve men’s lives greatly. Let’s get equality before we condemn men and wash our hands of the issue.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:14 PM
2

Even in here feminists are doing their wicked work to prevent any and all efforts to help men in anyway. Same happens in the ‘real world’. Feminists do whatever it takes to shut down efforts to help men. Seems you are part of that.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:11 PM
4

This displays the deep sickness, the sociopathy, of feminism. All attention, all social effort must be directed toward the female. Just sick in my opinion. Evil even.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:07 PM
2

Men just dont share, Too often this is used as an end point. "We know why: it’s their fault; no need to fix it."
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:01 PM
1

| This is what happens when you're told to "man up" and dismiss your depression. I’d say the problem is the source of the distress rather than the response to it. We could load men up on psychoactive drugs and the suicide rate would drop. Better to give mean equal rights and stop the hate campaigns.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:55 PM
7

This will almost certainly make service even more dangerous for men as women will take the safer support roles. We’d need to ensure there are as many females in combat as men and no nation is likely to willingly reduce its military effectiveness like that. I support drafting females but only if there are measures in place to ensure they get mutilated and killed as often as men.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 02:40 PM
6

What about problems that feminists are responsible for? Should we not blame them for those? For example the widespread sex discrimination against men in education and employment. Those programs are made possible by feminist politicians, created and implemented by feminist civil servants and corporate staff.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:11 PM
7

You give yourself away as a feminist by blaming men for their problems and by consistent use of dehumanizing language. Men are not broken females.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:54 PM
3

It’s her house now.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:20 PM
1

What a misguided question. I want the same legal rights as a female, starting with Constitutional rights. What sort of mind confused that simple quest for equality with film criticism?
/r/MensRights03/06/21 11:15 PM
5

Even if they weren’t seeking help that wouldn’t be used as an excuse to ignore and condemn them were it any other group. It would be seen as a call to action to help an underserved community.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 10:19 PM
3

It varies quite a bit with location. In some areas the pay is significantly above average and the demands are pretty low: an average education, minimal accountability, near 100% security, a good pension, and it’s about 40% of full time.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 07:50 PM
1

Feminists made it legal to discriminate against men on the basis of sex in my country. Only women have a constitutional right to be free from discrimination. That’s just one of thousands of bigoted, hate-driven, harmful feminist policies. How is that ‘not that bad?’
/r/MensRights26/05/21 07:48 PM
2

If men had equal legal rights feminists would find it more difficult to continue their attacks on men. In Canada for example it is legal to sexually discriminate against men but not women so feminists can run the most horrible anti-man programs with impunity. We could fight back in the courts if we had equality. I’ve never encountered a feminist who agreed that men should have even that fundamental equality of rights. They protect their privilege.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:00 AM
15

Do you get course credit for your bigoted disruptions here?
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:59 PM
2

Instead of being appreciative of the free health care she got in college (where they presumably also brainwashed her into lesbianism and infected her with multiple STIs), she complains.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 10:46 PM
2

Feminist doxing action?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 01:39 AM
3

In the west feminists are the most sexist by far. The only other groups that have any sexist policies are a few churches and that’s of such limited scope as to be ignorable.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:50 PM
1

I’m not worried about how politely men go about achieving equality so long as they do. I want men to have equal legal rights. If that offends some vile bigots so be it.
/r/MGTOW218/05/21 11:06 PM
13

Makes sense. Feminists say rape is about power not sex.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 04:18 PM
2

Standard procedure is to demonise and engender hatred for a group when you want to enact laws & policies to harm them.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 02:38 PM
5

Is that prohibited in some way in Australia? I assume so since there wouldn’t have been an investigation otherwise. It’s perfectly legal in Canada to discriminate against men on the basis of sex. Only females have a constitutional right to be free from sex discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 11:14 AM
5

Glad you posted that as I discovered Bane is active once again.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:13 PM
7

it's not his fault that he is what he is That’s damning with faint praise.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:26 PM
8

And they have the social power to make it ‘true’.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:24 PM
2

You could commit crimes, she could commit crimes. The question isn’t whether or not people can but whether or not they will. If she thinks you will commit crimes against her she shouldn’t associate with you and vice versa.
/r/MGTOW203/05/21 04:02 PM
2

I agree but I want to fairly evaluate other opinions so will note that T levels have precipitously fallen over the last few decades. What was true about men’s biological needs isn’t as true now.
/r/MGTOW203/05/21 02:48 PM
14

In Canada the highest law, the Constitution, permits sexual discrimination against men but not women. How are the many victims of that legislation not oppressed victims of sexism?
/r/MensRights30/04/21 03:07 PM
2

Yes. Probably just hides the gendering at the services level.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 02:43 PM
7

Nobody teaches boys how to handle sexual attention, wanted or unwanted. Mostly they figure it out quickly enough but it’s frustrating at the time. Considering organized educational efforts I guess it’s best to figure it out independently.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 04:42 AM
8

I’d do native Americans. Some interesting stories and the only group I feel empathy for.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:37 PM
3

I want the same constitutional rights as women in my country. That doesn’t make me a hate-filled bigot demanding privilege over others i.e. like a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:33 PM
2

Only half? I’d have to be an incredibly slow learner if I wasn’t afraid of violence from whoever. I’m rightly afraid and take suitable precautions.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 05:58 PM
3

Canada has been terrible for men for decades. Feminists rewrote human rights legislation in 1982 to make sex discrimination against men legal. It’s in the constitution; men formally have fewer human rights than women in Canada. But people just shrug.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 02:05 PM
11

| often lead to resentment, embitterment, and sometimes hatred for women If that’s your priority I do believe you are in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:04 PM
37

If she’d actually been afraid she’d have taken some kind of evasive action.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:46 PM
28

"He gets an extra 15% pay and that’s more than enough of a bonus." That’s probably what your boss was feeling even though she knows you get the same pay.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:14 AM
1

"Kill all men" isn’t the issue. Discriminatory laws and policies are. If the feminists have convinced you "kill all men" is the issue you’ve been deliberately defused. I want to undo the discrimination of ordinary feminists. The kill-all-men types aren’t important unless they are making legislation or policy attacking men
/r/MensRights20/04/21 07:53 PM
3

Nothing specific to contribute but I suspect most rape by women is via coercion and so far less likely to come to light. Not that I ever needed coercing.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 03:15 AM
19

There’s no legal process against the accuser so there’s no meaningful context for a presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:06 AM
10

Men mostly being relegated to trades is just what the feminists want. The fewer educated men the less power men have in society and the more bigoted and cruel feminist policy controls our lives.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:33 PM
1

This is definitely not the right place for people who are more concerned about female problems. Everywhere else is for those people. Why come here to derail and gaslight?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:29 PM
-4

Zero in common? One is a female complaint about gender roles and the other is a male complaint about gender roles. Hmmm. I think I understand your response now. You’re shocked that the female complaint that gets enormous social attention is so trivial next to the man’s complaint which is literally life and death but gets zero attention. Yes it is shocking.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:21 PM
4

That has to be a feminist interpretation of the argument against infant genital mutilation. It’s so completely dissociated with what anybody is actually thinking or saying, so bigoted.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 03:22 PM
59

Yes. Mother’s sexual preference, which varies by continent, becomes the deciding factor when mutilating boys is the issue.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 03:17 PM
8

That’s like objecting to ending slavery because there might be economic benefits to it. Medical benefits aren’t even an issue.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 03:15 PM
0

Very true. Asking females to do work men usually do is just as bad as forcing men to maim and kill, to risk being maimed or killed.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:29 AM
30

She’s the one with a problem so she should take action to resolve it. If she really believed someone was following her with evil intent the last thing she’d do is initiate an aggressive confrontation. She’d go into a shop, or double back on her trail, or stop and phone for help. But she didn’t do any of that because she did not really believe she was in danger. She just wanted to abuse a man and get some sweet, sweet victim points at the same time.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:20 AM
11

The post is clearly talking about real life.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 01:56 AM
1

Could be true but it certainly should not be used as an excuse to abandon and even sabotage boys in school. If boys need different treatment to thrive they should have it. Feminists deliberately restructured schooling to harm boys and then pretend they do less well because they are less intelligent.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:23 PM
2

That doesn’t mean there isn’t sex discrimination against men in that faculty. Even if it’s 100% men that’s no excuse to discriminate against male applicants.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:17 PM
8

Why are you here at all? A month ago someone posted something critical of a female; That’s what concerns you?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:08 PM
2

Many female privileges are the result of laws and policies and those are chosen. Where I live females have greater constitutional rights than men; how isn’t that female privilege?
/r/MensRights13/04/21 07:19 PM
3

Men’s diminishing scholastic achievement is a direct product of female privilege. As fewer and fewer men get a decent education the influence of the rational sex fades.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 07:16 PM
12

She said "It's more then just #MenAreTrash and #KillAllMen"... Why focus on hashtags and ignore the harmful bigoted law and policies made by feminists everywhere? I think I know why.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 12:12 AM
6

The Nazis made it a point to work with the Jews they were exterminating. They used Jewish leaders to organise the ghettos and transports, the death camps. Feminists who want men to work with them are following that same effective strategy.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 12:09 AM
17

Except feminism is an organised and extremely powerful political movement while rapists are not. If you support an organised political movement you can rightly be judged by its actions.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 12:06 AM
2

You must think very poorly of men if you believe 62 times out of 63 the best candidate was female. The force says the disparity in hiring was deliberate, the outcome of a program designed for that purpose: The balance has been tipped through the force’s ‘Positive Action’ initiative, which aims to recruit staff from under-represented groups.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:04 PM
8

Men are not broken women. If they aren’t as emotional as women that’s not a flaw. It should be obvious that being rational is preferable to being emotional.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:29 PM
4

My country legalised sex discrimination against men. Men literally have fewer constitutional human rights than females. It’s easy to understand why people would want the same rights as others isn’t it?
/r/MensRights03/04/21 03:49 PM
6

Feminists claim that Affirmative Action programs that give preference to females don’t entail discrimination against men... Is that the sort of thing you mean?
/r/MensRights01/04/21 07:45 PM
1

Not really worth describing the extremely rare, wholly unintended, and no doubt bitterly regretted examples... But: When females started wanting to work as mail-carriers heavy single side worn mail bags were replaced with a pair of lighter bags worn one on each side of the body. This was done to prevent repetitive strain injuries. It was done to protect the females but helped men as well. I’m certain the number of deaths in dangerous industries like forestry, construction, and fishing would be q…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 07:42 PM
2

When I’ve been sexually assaulted I haven’t made a fuss about it but that was because I didn’t really care not because I especially wanted to minimize it. I’m not referring to penetrative rape but being knocked to the ground, leapt on, and groped. Just part of the routine abuse of life.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 03:06 PM
16

Very true and of course there are far more at the bottom than at the top so the low end is more representative of men’s experience.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 03:08 PM
7

They can avoid men all they want so long as they don’t violate the rights of men as a group e.g. by instituting a men-only curfew. I too avoid people I consider too risky.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 06:03 PM
16

That’s wrong obviously. Some feminists pretend that discrimination in favor of the female is not discrimination against men but it’s a distinction without a difference. In my country the feminists made it legal to discriminate against men which wouldn’t have been done if such discrimination didn’t happen.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 04:52 PM
3

In Canada it is legal to sexually discriminate against men but not against females. Should men be deprived of that right because treating men equally is inconvenient for females?
/r/MensRights22/03/21 11:55 PM
2

Feminists are hate filled liars but they aren’t necessarily stupid. They know enough to say they support equality while what they actually do, the laws and policies they write, creates inequality.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 11:52 PM
2

Evidently you’ve been misled by lying feminists. I want equal rights. As a man I have fewer rights than females. It’s in the constitution... can’t get more clear cut than that.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 11:50 PM
1

Might be wise to research the legal implications before hitting anyone in retaliation. Self defense is permissible, vengeance isn’t.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:11 PM
7

Are you trying to tell us that ‘feminism helps men too’? Hope not because that’s not true. No matter what you call it feminism is a powerful hate movement that harms everyone.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 04:18 AM
3

Been telling females they are fantastic for decades and despite that and endless preferential treatment they still aren’t making significant contributions to science and industry. We already had enough mediocrity and useless paperwork.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 08:09 PM
4

Very much a deliberate display of their immense social power to have people condemn child genital mutilation for one sex and endorse it for the other.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 12:00 AM
4

I’m tired of efforts being made to help those already in a privileged position. Men are more often victimized than females. If any single group is to be made safer obviously it should be the less safe group.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 10:15 PM
3

Men are already more often victimized than are females. Intervening to protect those who are already better off would only cause even more men to be victimised. Our goal shouldn’t be to offset violence from females to men.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 03:11 PM
1

That’s not why it’s wrong to demonise a group. Imagine saying Nazi anti Semitic propaganda was wrong because the Jews might fight back... symptom of a broken mind.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:16 AM
2

Pretty sure Dahmer and Gacey raped, tortured, and murdered only young men... Poof! They have become invisible.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:13 AM
1

Like an SS camp commander complaining about the Jews ... Feminists are vile creatures.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:10 AM
1

Trouble is only specific hyper-privileged people will be deemed victims of hate crimes.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:03 AM
1

They’ve been trotting out the curfew line for decades, starting with Israeli PM Golda Meir. It used to be understood as a rhetorical device rather than a real policy but after a year of COVID19 lockdowns it’s more plausible. We do live in a world where masses of innocent people have their movement restricted for the supposed benefit of society.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:41 PM
1

It could be due to whatever it is that causes men to generally do more than women whether it’s doing research, inventing technologies, starting businesses, playing sports, or violent crime. Is it sex hormones? Is it lack of alternatives? Whatever it is we should be wary of throwing out the baby with the bath water. If we pacify men we stand to lose the overwhelmingly positive contributions they make.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 10:37 PM
1

Always been my policy to not bow to anyone. Doesn’t come up often though.
/r/MGTOW213/03/21 03:56 AM
2

Is Phillips the one who complained so bitterly when a YouTuber said he wouldn’t rape her?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:15 PM
2

If you want to see victim blaming at its finest mention that to a feminist. "Those men were mostly attacked by other men!"
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:19 PM
2

Obviously a Golda Meir reference.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:14 PM
2

An individual woman walking alone at night might (we don’t know) be more at risk but the stats make it very clear men are more often victims. Explain that without resorting to victim blaming.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:13 PM
5

Don’t count on them stopping in ten years. They’ve been affirmative actioning women and POCs for 40 years already. It’s just getting more exposure now and there’s even more of it.
/r/MGTOW210/03/21 04:25 PM
8

That’s often not the case. Many jurisdictions simply arrest & remove the man. Removing someone prevents immediate harm and they view men generally as more likely to be aggressors and to cause greater injury.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 05:32 PM
5

Feminists have consistently not only refused to work with egalitarians, but have routinely criminally attacked and sabotaged them. Offers of collaboration are simply yet another attempt to district and deflect men’s work to achieve equality.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 05:49 AM
2

People hired because of their sex or race generally will have less skill, knowledge, and ability and will rightly be regarded as less competent than they ought to be. Feminists want to be given jobs for which they aren’t qualified and to punish anyone who notices their lack of qualification.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 05:25 PM
2

"Toxic masculinity" is a hate propaganda phrase. Any user of that phrase is exhibiting misandry.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 08:49 PM
3

You must realize we’re discussing social values and trends rather than individuals. You understand that "male suicide" doesn’t imply all men have killed themselves but you pretend "women are goddesses" is meant to describe all females. That’s disingenuous.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:47 PM
5

What a dreadful argument: ‘People disagree with my bigoted opinion. That proves me right.’
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:39 PM
1

You’re evident need to deflect attention from feminists is the only oddity here.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:36 PM
3

It’s feminists attacking men with legislation & policy. Most of them are women but some are men. If we focus on feminists we are correct.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:35 PM
3

Some Jews helped the Nazis commit genocide but that doesn’t warrant deflecting blame from the Nazis.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:34 PM
3

What are you hoping to get out of this post? Feminists don’t need your ‘protection’, they are the status quo, have massive political and social power. And they’ll still destroy you if they want despite you’re having demonstrated your ‘allyship’. Or do you just love telling others how to behave?
/r/MensRights21/02/21 04:32 PM
13

Do glad I don’t have to concern myself with all this.
/r/MGTOW220/02/21 07:05 PM
8

Feminists in Canada legalised sex discrimination against men and race discrimination against Europeans. Prior to that all sex and race discrimination had been banned. That is in the nation’s constitution: the highest law in the land and amendable only by a super-majority. As far as I know that sort of vile bigotry is unknown in the west since Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 06:47 PM
3

In Canada lawyers are duty bound to tell female clients that they can get a great advantage in court by claiming abuse of themselves or children, even if there is no basis for the claim. Failure to do so is considered negligent.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 08:02 PM
1

People should have equal rights even if they disagree with you on specific issues.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:34 PM
6

But it’s hate speech, based on a desire to denigrate all men. Unless you endorse the term ‘toxic Africanness’ to explain far higher African crime rates you should abandon the bigoted phrase ‘toxic masculinity’.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:14 PM
1

Could be. I haven’t noticed. Happily men are marvelously tolerant and can coexist and collaborate without enforcing a rigid ideology.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:07 PM
1

The only feminists that matter are the vast number of very powerful feminist legislators and policy makers. Their sick hate driven conspiracy theories result in real world effects on innocent people. There is no parallel at all to MRAs who often can’t even hold meetings due to feminist criminals threatening venues.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:05 PM
2

Feminist extremists are very powerful. They write legislation and corporate policy. Their hate fueled conspiracy theories affect people's lives. Any complaints about this sub are inconsequential next to that.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 01:25 AM
6

The females aren’t heroes here. They forced other people to give up half their toilet space. If they’d given up something themselves it might be different.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 10:00 AM
15

What they really want is to put you all in an un-heated, half collapsed barn a few miles away.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 09:54 AM
1

No doubt some rules would need to be changed to allow it but an enlarged military might be used for mass gun confiscation or forced vaccinations.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 06:28 PM
1

| MGTOW exists because men have trouble getting women You may have misunderstood. It is about not getting women but by the man’s choice rather than through womens’ rejection. Men come to appreciate the problems by getting women and than choose to avoid repeating the error.
/r/MGTOW214/02/21 05:59 PM
2

My last romantic/sexual relationship ended by suicide and that shocked the desire out of me.
/r/MGTOW213/02/21 05:20 AM
5

The Nazis outwitted the Jews of Europe... they weren’t superior, just bad.
/r/MGTOW210/02/21 12:23 AM
9

Might be excusable as ‘just a joke’ or irony if men weren’t already the majority of victims of violence. In their safety & privilege women fail to recognize how significant violence is in men’s lives.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 01:46 PM
16

She must be a terribly low quality female if all she attracts is men who are "not nice or pleasant to be around".
/r/MensRights03/02/21 12:47 AM
21

In many places simply performing the duties of a father can make you liable in court regardless of DNA. So if you paid to house and feed the kid you’re on the hook. Where I live paternity tests aren’t even admissible unless the mother agrees.
/r/MGTOW201/02/21 07:45 PM
6

Different political parties sometimes do have different policies. Biden has said he’ll distribute COVID19 relief according to the ‘progressive stack’: white men last if at all. Biden has said he’ll restore the college kangaroo courts for men accused of sexual impropriety.
/r/MGTOW221/01/21 09:45 PM
11

In western nations racial discrimination against europeans is the only permitted, often legal, and systemic racism that exists. So white men have the additional burden of race discrimination.
/r/MGTOW221/01/21 09:42 PM
9

Great to see if they actually help rather than simply assuming the man needs anger management training or jailing. They should back it up with statistics and real cases with real men helped and real women convicted.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 01:14 AM
22

I wonder if they say those things to the men in their lives?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 04:05 AM
13

Some bad advice there from people pretending men have equal rights and can safely call the police on a female.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:00 AM
6

The extremists write legislation and make corporate policy. They are the only ones that matter because they have power.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 05:53 AM
5

A decades long hate propaganda campaign smearing men allows them to treated as second class citizens. People in general believe that men don’t deserve to be treated as equal human beings.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:46 AM
2

They’re going to fall over if they lean out given that they’re already leaning in.
/r/MGTOW215/01/21 03:36 PM
1

Diversity as in sex discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights15/01/21 06:13 AM
6

Not anymore! Beijing Biden is going to restore sexual discrimination against men. He’s already promised to restore the kangaroo courts for sex complaints in schools.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:09 PM
11

It’s much more than just giving them job skills... it gives them personal contacts inside deeply bigoted companies that will translate into paying positions.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:07 PM
31

Women being able to know things in magical ways is part of feminist ideology. The head of NOW in the USA for example believes women can "know things in their vagina".
/r/MensRights12/01/21 11:46 AM
4

Some people would say it’s you but unfortunately that’s very probably not the case. It’s a general societal collapse.
/r/MGTOW209/01/21 04:13 AM
3

Such a personal subject. Only you can know if it’s right for you or not. I’d spend some time reviewing available research if you haven’t already.
/r/MGTOW209/01/21 03:57 AM
1

My experience shows that mgtow are mostly the opposite of incels. Men are naturally strongly attracted to women and mgtow generally have learned from direct experience that they should work to overcome their attraction to women. Incels don’t have experience with women and want to have it. Opposite goals.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 05:05 PM
2

It seems as if it’s a real social issue and I expect there’d be some research on the subject if it weren’t a men’s issue. As it is we know little beyond anecdotal reports. The smear attacks on incels are mostly a means of ensuring no serious attention is paid to a significant problem. Can’t have any effort given over to solving men’s problems. That wouldn’t do at all.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 12:07 PM
13

Decriminalization may not be what you think. Look at how other feminist run nations have handled it in the past. In Canada for example decriminalization of prostitution meant selling sex was no longer a crime while buying sex remained one.
/r/MGTOW207/01/21 09:15 PM
4

Canada’s constitution act of 1982 made sex discrimination against men legal while retaining that protection for women.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 06:37 PM
10

If paid work time were adjusted to reflect time spent gossiping and preening women’s privilege would be even more clearly exposed.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 05:54 PM
11

According to the National Organization for Women‘s president women can "know things in their vagina"... perhaps that’s where he got his numbers.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 05:51 PM
2

Have you seen the video clip of the head of NOW in the USA talking about how "women know things in their vagina"? They believe in magic.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 10:54 AM
7

Feminists can’t abide anything that might threaten their privilege and so they constantly smear men’s rights proponents with baseless accusations. It’s just men wanting equal rights with women.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 07:43 PM
22

In Canada the change I’d first like to see is necessary to fix most other problems: amend the Constitution act of 1982 so that men have the same protection from sex discrimination as women. Once that’s done we can go after specific discriminatory policies and legislation.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 11:23 PM
10

No surprise men underreport when many are in Duluth model jurisdictions and know they will likely be arrested if they report being victimized by a female in a domestic scenario.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 08:35 PM
1

TNG depicts a rigidly hierarchical militarized society. It pretends to be egalitarian in superficial ways but the core culture is anything but.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 09:33 PM
1

All men are already included. Anyone being oppressed because they are a man is included. You are talking about people oppressed for other reasons. Intersectional movements can never include their common hated enemy, heterosexual white men, and there are many of those in the men’s rights movement. Intersectionality isn’t a viable strategy for us in anyway.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 09:29 PM
1

There are large and powerful gay and trans rights groups. Any person being oppressed for being gay or trans would be best advised to use those powerful and socially acceptable groups rather than the powerless and widely despised men’s rights movement. I suspect any appeals like OP are just an attempt to disrupt work on men’s rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 09:24 PM
9

Some people work best under pressure and there’ll be lots of pressure if you wait until tomorrow. Alternatively you can trick yourself into working on whatever it is. Tell yourself you are just going to get setup to do the task, not actually work on it. After doing that you may as well work on it for a minute or two. Etc.
/r/MGTOW229/12/20 01:44 PM
2

Rather than simply giving up perhaps we should make health care more accessible to men? For example it’s generally very difficult for men in many male dominated fields to take an hour or two off in the middle of a shift to see a doctor. I suspect it’s far more satisfying for feminists to take yet another poke at men and smugly abandon the problem.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 07:59 PM
3

And they always stop thinking about the issue as soon as they get to the point of blaming men. They ought to be working to provide care in ways that does work for men but instead they throw up their hands and walk away.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 07:57 PM
3

Abstinence doesn’t provide full protection either. No court will believe you didn’t have sex with a female if she says you had consensual sex with her. At that point you need a paternity test and in some countries that’s impossible without the female parent’s consent. If she wants your money she’ll get it.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 08:03 PM
3

Even vasectomy doesn’t provide complete protection in some feminist nations like Canada. Since vasectomy can fail or naturally reverse you’d need a paternity test to convince a court you aren’t the father but you can’t get a paternity test without the female parent’s consent.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 08:00 PM
13

Can’t recall which MRA it was but it’s been suggested that men on juries must always acquit when in a jurisdiction that allows withholding of exculpatory evidence.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 06:04 PM
3

There’s no valid excuse for groping a stranger in public. If you were ‘on a date’ it might be excusable as them trying to escalate an already sexual situation. If your friend laughs about it perhaps she just doesn’t see you as the vulnerable type. I’ve had friends laugh about a similar occurrence (a bruise inducing ass pinch from one of a group of women on the street), but be very supportive over a more severe event (crotch grabbed, knocked off chair onto the ground and leapt on).
/r/MensRights27/12/20 12:00 PM
7

Haven’t seen any sign of it losing any of its massive institutional power or of the waning of the general pro-female bias of society.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 11:09 AM
5

In Canada sexism against men couldn’t get more institutional. The highest law of the land, the constitution act of 1982, makes sex discrimination against men legal. Prior to that both men and women were protected against sex discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 09:59 AM
2

I know exactly where the oppression comes from and it is indeed from feminists. Feminist in my country made sex discrimination against men legal in 1982.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:17 AM
3

Feminist with shaved head fooled them?
/r/MensRights23/12/20 04:03 PM
3

The pay gap has been thoroughly debunked. No point discussing feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 10:12 PM
1

I’d never participate without trustworthy assurances that I wouldn’t be arrested due to mandatory reporting rules and Duluth model ‘arrest the man’ policies.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 06:32 PM
2

Wasn’t aware any country had actually implemented affirmative consent for criminal cases. For school administrative punishment I know it has.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 03:23 PM
8

I want an end to the sex discrimination. Just the same rights every woman has.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:19 AM
10

How can their identity be determined if they don’t experience puberty when most of the sex differences and sexual preferences are manifested?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:26 PM
2

And life has always required much more of men in terms of being out in the world competing. Women don’t have to do much in life even today if they don’t want to and are generally protected from competition when they do. Women can afford to be kind and gentle and non-threatening while most men don’t have that luxury. So men are in fact less pleasant than women because they have to be.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:54 PM
2

Yup. The wife is spending her days working with more aggressive, higher earning men than her househusband... monkey-branching ensues.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:15 PM
1

Enormously risky for men to be the stay-at-home parent in most jurisdictions. In the event of divorce he won’t be given custody and wife will not be ordered to support him and the kids financially.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:13 PM
1

Are you going to tell us about your narrow escapes serving with the SAS now?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:09 PM
1

Or it leaves you broken and perhaps unable to function normally. But if your experience of trials and tribulations is student life you wouldn’t know that.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:06 PM
3

There is formal, documented, systemic discrimination against people of European origin. All other discrimination is illegal, non-systemic, and essentially nonexistent since massive ‘affirmative action’ programs far outweigh any contrary discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:04 PM
1

Very different scenarios. Selecting an employee establishes a long term financial commitment to a person so employers are more likely to consider factors related to sex or race e.g. is this person going to cost me more because they will take more sick time, get pregnant, not be punctual, file fake sexism/racism claims, loot the building, etc. Grading papers and tests doesn’t impose any cost on the grader so exposes pure bigotry.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:01 PM
5

Computer science programs are stuffed full of affirmative action hires with little understanding of the technology. Probably your instructor didn’t recognize or appreciate the value of a multithreaded architecture.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:47 PM
5

Many courses have decreased the weighting of traditional exams, where men excel, and added group projects and class participation marks specifically in order to increase female scores.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:41 PM
4

People don’t like being discriminated against; is that really surprising to you? Feminism is in no way concerned with equality. It’s a powerful hate movement that deliberately harms one sex.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:38 PM
6

They can actually kick you in the balls and if you dare complain they’ll say you sexually assaulted them.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:35 PM
3

Very unlikely. Before feminist attacks on men’s education they uniformly outperformed females. It only changed because of feminist efforts to lower men’s grades. They put anti-male measures in place in (I think) the mid 90s after a feminist published some phoney research claiming that females where discriminated against in education. Now they’ve suppressed men’s achievement they are crowing about the incredible natural ability of females.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:31 PM
7

It’s a taboo subject but IQ scores show female scores have a lower standard deviation than men’s scores. This means female IQs tend to huddle together more tightly in the normal range. There really are more stupid men than stupid women, and more brilliant men than brilliant women. Feminists don’t like to talk about the latter.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:15 PM
1

If a student exceeds expectations for their educational level I can understand markers going over 100% but I don’t agree with it. When I was a student I managed my effort based on the relative weight of course activity. If the instructor changes the contract after the fact it destroys my careful time management. If for example I knew ahead of time it would be possible to earn 110% on a term paper I could put more effort into that and less into something I’d rather not work on like a group projec…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:08 PM
8

Embarrassing that feminists had to put their thumb on the scale so hard to get females to (on paper) match and then beat men’s performance? Or embarrassing because feminists now pretend that females are just naturally brighter rather than beneficiaries of an organised sex discrimination program?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 06:00 PM
12

Feminists would see that as sexism against the female students since they were ‘denied education’ because of their sex.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 05:39 PM
26

But women aren’t held responsible for pregnancy at all. Only men have a legally enforceable inescapable duty to care for their offspring. Women can abandon their offspring without consequences at any point, and will be subsidized by the state if they choose to keep a child but have no money, circumstance that would land a man in jail for failure to pay child support.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 12:00 AM
2

This is one of the few things I’ve learnt about women over long, painful experience. It’s hard to act on this knowledge because it goes against my nature to acknowledge a problem without wanting to solve it. It is painful for me to listen to a problem and not give advice. I do it because I know that’s what they want but it hurts. It’s as if they are out sourcing their adult responsibilities to me.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:52 PM
5

Did she say how long men need to be oppressed? They’ve been doing it for nearly forty years where I live.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 01:26 PM
8

Bunch of sick bigots. Like they think they are Chinese royalty and mere peasants mustn’t even look at them. The landlord is probably making a mistake by allowing a private business to service customers on site anyway. Who’s liable for lawsuits from those customers? The landlord? All the tenants?
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:40 PM
4

Obviously you’re right that calling people ‘haters’ is pejorative and can only be intended as a smear. A sincere attempt at discussion doesn’t begin with smears.
/r/MGTOW205/12/20 01:06 PM
3

Feminist action has very serious consequences for all men. They won’t decide not to discriminate against you in education and employment because of your sexual preference. Their hate propaganda is directed against all men.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:54 PM
14

NHS study found female doctors did half the work of men over a full career.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 09:08 PM
7

Edmund Kemper is the only example I know of misogyny. He said he committed brutal crimes because he hated women. Other than that it’s mostly just fake claims of victimization.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 12:53 AM
7

The entire rest of society is available for and frequently engaged in whining about how tough females have it.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 12:50 AM
8

Not only maintaining infrastructure but designing and building it in the first place. All the difference between a chimp society and a modern human society is due to the creativity and tenacity of men.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 09:33 PM
5

It’s not all good at all. Promoting feminism to men is like promoting Nazism to Jews. Feminism is a hate movement that promotes and executes policies that intentionally harm men entirely because they are men.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 09:15 PM
3

Men provide infinitely more than just labor for the economy. All the science & technology that make it possible for so many people to live at such a high standard come from men. And all the things possible because of the surplus productivity men create are dependent on men as well. No men = no art, no philosophy, no progress.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 09:07 PM
14

Makes it pretty explicit doesn’t it? You don’t deserve empathy and support entirely because you are a man.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 05:29 PM
16

Men have to be cautious about reporting. Many people (therapists, doctors, teachers, etc) are legally obligated to tell the police if you mention it. If you are in a Duluth model area you will get arrested if you report being abused by a female domestic partner.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 12:28 PM
3

The reasoning behind it escapes me. "Only real women of a given age range use these products so the taxpayer should pay for them." I don’t follow the argument. There doesn’t really seem to be one.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 07:49 PM
11

She doesn’t object to sex discrimination against men or the decades long hate campaign from feminists.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:21 PM
1

So long as the laws are applied equally it’s okay. If people can succeed in a business that eliminates potential customers based on race, sex, whatever that’s fine by me. But they better allow ‘No Africans’ if they allow ‘No Men’.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:56 AM
6

Most dangerous jobs aren’t ones that have specific fitness tests. Construction work, fishing, etc. are where the most harm accrues. Sadly what tends to happen is that women are affirmative actioned into jobs where they can’t be very productive and then promoted into supervisory roles to protect them from their own inability. This is incredibly destructive to the men who normally would have earned those roles as they aged or were injured out of the grunt work the women never had to do.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:48 AM
2

You’ve been deceived by feminist hate propaganda. Men in the past didn’t sexually assault women any more than today.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:00 PM
1

Like an SS officer marching into a synagogue in 1933 demanding to be told how to be a better Nazi. You people have been passing discriminatory laws and policies against us for decades. In my country it was made legal to discriminate against men on the basis of sex in 1982 and thousands of subsequent laws and policies doing so have since been enacted.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 02:53 PM
8

Any university library will provide endless examples. Any feminist publication will do. Any sex related government policy will do. Any sex related NGO policy will do.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:34 AM
6

That used to be more than enough. Thirty, even twenty years ago you’d have had plenty of choice.
/r/MGTOW222/11/20 03:09 AM
2

Haven’t watched cable TV since the Brady Bunch was in production.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 04:57 PM
1

If a female is four times as productive as a man should she get only the same wage?
/r/MensRights19/11/20 06:47 PM
2

I’m alone because my wife died...
/r/MGTOW219/11/20 06:13 PM
9

She wouldn’t even acknowledge men’s humanity and wrote "males" instead. Male what? Snakes? Parakeets?
/r/MensRights19/11/20 02:36 PM
2

Surely it’s easy to guess? They don’t like the loss of money NDP power.
/r/MGTOW215/11/20 05:19 PM
10

Item 1 is a bit odd. False allegations are the topic and that has little to do with actual rapes. Not raping only prevents valid rape charges and that’s a concern for very few people despite feminist hate propaganda to the contrary. Item 3 - I’ve never seen a documented criminal case where drunkenness invalidated consent. Unconsciousness yes, college discipline cases yes.
/r/MGTOW214/11/20 04:07 PM
1

Men are broken women; got it.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 08:14 PM
8

They sometimes tell MRAs to work with feminists but it’s just meant to distract and defuse the MRAs. It’s a classic move. Recall that the Nazis used councils comprised of Jews to control aspects of the Holocaust. Those Jews were told the two sides could work together... what really happened is Jewish leaders who could have led resistance were co-opted and used their power to help destroy their own communities. The feminists want to do the same. Less extreme examples include school councils compr…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:02 AM
8

It’s not the case that things are always balanced just because there seem to be two opposing sides. Feminists have a great deal of power. They write legislation and policy in government and the corporate world using their great power to harm men. It’s a powerful hate movement. MRAs have no power and seek only to defend against feminist attack. It’s not sensible to equate the two.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:57 AM
3

women do not have equal rights when it comes to job offerings That’s true; they have superior rights. It’s been legal to sexually discriminate against men in Canada since 1982. Many other countries including the USA support such discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 11:58 AM
2

And rape culture. That requires truly crazed thought processes.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 11:55 AM
3

A cult even. Look at what organized feminists do to anyone who leaves the faith.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 11:54 AM
11

Of course he’s fine. And there’s no point blaming his parents since they just followed standard medical advice in their community. But that does not change the fact that it’s wrong to perform significant cosmetic surgery on non-consenting people. Even if they are children and even if they are male it’s unethical.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 11:53 AM
4

No. Women benefit from discrimination in their favour and from discrimination against men. Just wait. You’ll find out.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 12:17 PM
6

Safer to make her think it’s her decision. Otherwise she make false accusations to punish you and save face.
/r/MGTOW210/08/20 02:09 PM
0

That’s the start of the slide into punishing people for pre-crime.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:43 PM
4

Feminist policy governing some police actions are the problem not the police themselves.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:40 PM
7

Pretty sure she’s serious.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:38 PM
-1

Hussein Obama made BLM what it is and BLM are responsible for twenty plus police shootings. I’d say Dems approve of and promote police shootings.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:37 PM
2

Hardee fucking har har. Feminists made the policies that require arresting the man regardless of who has been violent. They are the enemy of all men. Mandatory arrest means mandatory arrest of the man.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:12 PM
6

Arresting the man regardless of who’s the victim is literal policy in many police departments. The Duluth Model is policy in many jurisdictions. Men can’t safely discuss being a victim of female violence with doctors, therapists, etc. because those people are legally required to report all domestic violence to police who are in turn bound by policy that requires arresting the man.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:09 PM
20

Astounding entitlement. She actually thinks she gets to dictate to men how they must behave, which includes not looking at her as if she’s Chinese royalty. Must be a bit of a shock for her to not get what she wants. And since her persecution is likely entirely within her own mind it’s never going to stop.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 03:02 AM
15

Academics and politicians are literally saying ‘whiteness needs to be ended’. That’s pre-genocidal language. May seem a non-issue in Vermont or Scotland, places that are still ethnostates, but it’s very real if you’ve seen demographics nearly reverse in your city.
/r/MGTOW206/08/20 04:00 PM
4

I prefer to mind my own business (apart from reading about yours now you’ve publicly posted it). How is it your concern whatever she says, does, or thinks?
/r/MGTOW206/08/20 03:50 PM
3

She’s far beyond rational thought. Don’t waste your time on that vile sexist, racist, bigot.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 11:16 PM
8

Evidently that’s not the case. If he’s already demonstrated that he will hit her why would she now think he won’t hit her back?
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:09 AM
2

Exactly... so pricing should be based on mileage not anatomy.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 02:54 PM
26

They aren’t trying to do that. The intent is to provide an excuse for doing nothing to help men so resources continue to flow to feminist causes. E.g. "We don’t need male focused sexual assault recovery programs. Men need to fix this themselves by being more like women."
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:00 PM
6

It’s fine to be critical of women. It’s not hatred.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:49 AM
6

Or the feminism that’s powerful enough to make law and corporate policy that explicitly discriminates against men on the basis of sex? It’s such a fundamental contradiction that it ought to be the second thing anybody learns about feminism.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:47 AM
33

What about fighting sex discrimination against men in education & employment? Is that fragility as well?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 05:27 AM
2

Now do one about how many are secret child rapists.
/r/MGTOW225/07/20 03:47 AM
13

Evidently you have little experience of feminists. No position is too extreme to be real.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 01:29 PM
3

Feminists’ primary efforts for decades has been to attack men. How can a group that writes laws and policies that intentionally harm men solely for being men work together with MRAs? I want equal rights not fewer and fewer.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:28 PM
3

The phrase is not misunderstood. People reject it because they see through the feminist dogma to the vile message of hate at its core.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:23 PM
3

Why? Because feminists are powerful and privileged hate-filled bigots.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:22 PM
1

It’s feminist hate speech. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:20 PM
8

A young man has been sexually assaulted and punished for it and rather than being empathetic you try to silence him. You must be a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:13 PM
14

Typically happens where a man is seen to have taken on a parental role in the past. That’s their justification.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 01:52 PM
3

According to definition two the fact that women give birth is sexist.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 10:28 PM
5

Ordinary women are dangerous enough. Bipolar, depressive women are orders of magnitude worse.
/r/MGTOW214/07/20 04:39 PM
1

Buying flowers is a bridge too far for me. I can’t do it. I won’t do it.
/r/MGTOW214/07/20 04:35 PM
3

And even doing that is considered criminal domestic abuse if you’re a man. All you can safely do is leave.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:22 PM
3

Or maybe he raped her! Or raped her baby! Oh gosh. It’s definitely not her fault.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:19 PM
2

I think it’s more than them just being accustomed to being irresponsible. They see attacking men as brave and empowering. It’s political.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:18 PM
1

He’d certainly be in prison had he. Even without having touched her he could have been arrested in this circumstance. In Duluth model jurisdictions the man is arrested even when only he was assaulted because it’s assumed that he is more physically dangerous and will retaliate.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:16 PM
14

Utter nonsense. There is no equivalence. Feminists have enormous political power and have had for over fifty years. Feminists make laws and corporate policies that directly control people’s lives. MRAs have no power at all and are destroyed for simply asking to have some of the discrimination against them eased.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 03:57 AM
2

Good movie though. Saw it before seeing the murderer herself and thought she did a great job portraying an uneducated street person. After seeing interviews with the killer I realised the actress mostly just directly mimicked her. Still skilful of course.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:32 PM
3

They’re all affirmative action hires anyway.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:42 PM
3

Probably they were too busy chatting to do the math.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 11:22 PM
7

I have to agree with what (I think it was) Paul Elam said about sexual assault trials. Feminist changes to evidentiary rules automatically create reasonable doubt. The rules require removal of exculpatory evidence so we cannot reasonably convict.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 12:50 PM
8

Feminists do not want equal rights with men. Women have more rights than men yet feminists never argue to have rights taken from women or given to men.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 06:04 AM
0

22? Unless that’s an unrelated image that is an extremely unfortunate 22.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 10:36 PM
0

Where can you go that isn’t doing the same? Better to prevent the discrimination in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:21 PM
1

At least in Australia sexists need to apply for a formal exemption before they can legally discriminate. In Canada it’s simply legal to discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:19 PM
1

Are you really surprised people don’t support sex discrimination? I thought everyone but the Catholic Church saw the light back in the 60s.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:14 PM
2

I bet you wouldn’t support the same discrimination against females, or Africans, or Muslims, etc.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:11 PM
2

No. Sex and race discrimination are both wrong and inefficient.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:09 PM
1

In Canada they don’t need to apply for an exemption they can just go ahead and discriminate against men based on sex and the highest law in the land backs them up.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:08 PM
4

They literally claim meritocracy is sexist and racist.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:06 PM
1

See many fifty year olds wielding shovels? It’s not a workable long term strategy for most.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:34 PM
3

Trouble is there’s so much profit in software that companies can be very inefficient and still survive. Google could probably lose 2/3rds of its staff and actually do better.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:32 PM
-1

It’s hard work, requires extended periods of concentration, and a preference for working with things rather than people. All those factors make females generally less suitable to software development. I’ve worked with good female developers but never ones that enjoy it.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:27 PM
1

The feminists didn’t want to go into STEM either. It’s hard work and requires a decent brain.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:24 PM
13

Men have been forced out of higher education and office jobs by all kinds of anti-man programs in education & hiring over the past few decades. This does force more men than ever into dirty, dangerous, debilitating work. It’s a deliberately engineered change.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:43 PM
11

She’s a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 11:53 PM
1

I know a woman who stole two or three hundred thousand and wasn’t even charged despite extensive video evidence from a months long police surveillance operation. Good friend of mine.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 05:04 PM
14

They were doing this in the 80s in Canada. Just after the feminists legalised sex discrimination against men. I recall an art college in Ontario proudly announcing they wouldn’t hire any men until the year 2000.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 08:50 PM
3

Have you done any research yet?
/r/MGTOW220/06/20 07:48 AM
9

Assume the system is 100% against you. Notions of justice are immediately thrown out the window in divorce court. They will laugh in your face and revel in being unfair to you. Get a great lawyer or run if you have portable safe assets.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 07:15 PM
1

Enlist in the military.
/r/MGTOW217/06/20 06:35 PM
4

40% drop in testosterone levels in the past few decades might have something to do with it too.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:47 AM
29

That’s completely wrong. Slavery in the West was ended by European people and they are still the only people to have ended it. Africans practice slavery to this day. Makes no sense to attack those who ended slavery and celebrate those who still practice it.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:11 PM
19

Africans are already under represented among those killed by police based on number of police contacts. African privilege. Excitable people have been misled by the MSM again.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:07 PM
93

Depending on the country it may be legal. In Canada for example only sex discrimination against females is illegal and only race discrimination against non-whites illegal.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:59 PM
7

She probably wants you to reassure her you don’t blame her. It was very much standard procedure in some countries for decades.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:11 PM
2

Scary that people actually believe that.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:54 PM
1

That gets too complicated for some people.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:42 PM
6

The numbers just don’t support the claim that police are racist towards Africans. When number of police encounters is taken into account Africans are under represented among those killed by police. There’s overwhelming publicity when an African is killed and that makes it easy for people to misunderstand reality.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:41 PM
0

Who’s taking away their voice? African women have pretty much the biggest megaphone on earth right now. BLM (run by African women) has so much power it’s started mayhem across the western world.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:35 PM
9

Perhaps it’s not despite that aversion but because of it. Being forced to submit to involuntary mutilation of a central pillar of one’s identity bestows greater power on the establishment.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:05 PM
18

Do you get course credit in your Women’s Studies program for disrupting conversation here?
/r/MensRights14/06/20 04:17 PM
10

It reflects government policy and that makes it important.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 04:15 PM
15

"What about the women!" They’re tough, they can handle a tiny bit of criticism for their decades long hate movement. Imagine calling just criticism of powerful bigots "putting down women"...
/r/MensRights13/06/20 02:47 PM
1

Sounds like my experience. Everybody wanted a partner and everybody partnered up.
/r/MGTOW211/06/20 04:18 PM
6

I don’t see gangs of white on the street beating black men.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 04:08 PM
-2

Maybe it’s true. Aren’t African families traditionally matrilineal and father free?
/r/MensRights07/06/20 04:06 PM
0

Why are derailing feminists tolerated here? They are the status quo. In power and still attacking the egalitarians.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:04 PM
1

What choice would you make if you’re told additional strength means being slotted into dirty, dangerous, debilitating work while additional childbirth means being protected and provided for?
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:01 PM
2

black people are indiscriminately killed more than white people The numbers don’t support that. In fact they support the opposite conclusion. African deaths should match their share of police contacts but are significantly lower than that due to African privilege.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:22 PM
8

As a feminist actively derailing and demeaning efforts to attain equal rights for men you have to ask? You are the problem.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:16 PM
11

YouTuber TL;DR has a couple of well made videos about the ‘pink tax’. e.g.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 09:27 AM
1

Police applied approved techniques to restrain a violent criminal. Sadly sometimes people die from that. In this case it’s not very sad because the dead man was a long time violent criminal and the world is better for his absence.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 05:26 PM
1

What hostile sexism towards women? Are you talking about Somalia?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 02:09 PM
-4

Are you part of the marketing team? You seem heavily invested in selling this person.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 12:14 PM
3

That community gets it wrong quite consistently. They defend the aggressor and riot over legitimate self defence .
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:34 PM
-3

Resist arrest and the police are permitted to use force. Should they just let anyone who wants to walk away?
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:32 PM
4

You ought to care since those feminists write legislation and policy that governs all men’s lives.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:16 PM
5

And last time your deeply flawed rationalization was thoroughly debunked despite your attempts to derail the conversation.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:12 PM
3

Almost certainly a men only group like a testicular cancer support group would be forced to accept any female who wanted to join.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 10:10 PM
18

Seems the feminists have planted some nasty propaganda on you. Far easier for women to get those high paying jobs than for men to but they simply don’t want to work that hard. Generally they can reap the rewards of a higher income job simply by sponging off a harder working man.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:33 AM
22

Is she the one that keeps celebrating the high suicide rate among men despite having driven her own son to suicide?
/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:30 AM
-1

The feminist is celebrating the death of men and you attack the person objecting to it? She’s a murderous bigot.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 07:02 PM
5

It’s not an honest belief though. People say women are always right meaning ‘women have the power to get their way regardless of being in the wrong’. They don’t actually mean women are factually right in the 2+2=4 sense.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 04:31 PM
2

Surprised they have enough sense of humor to pick a name that TLAs down to FDS.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:50 PM
2

Women have significantly greater rights than men. Nothing equal about it.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:43 PM
9

That’s lovely but you don’t have the power to make laws and write policy. The powerful feminists are the ones who matter and they support discrimination against men and hate literature.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:41 PM
6

Men are not broken women. They don’t need to change themselves to be more female. They need relief from discriminatory policies.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:29 PM
75

It’s a display of power. They have such a tight grip on the culture that they can redefine whatever they like whenever they like and have it accepted.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:52 PM
4

All the victim groups have university programs in the USA and other Anglosphere countries. Women’s Studies, Gender Studies, African Studies, Latin Studies, Disabled Studies. You can actually get degrees in those fields.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 01:39 PM
2

Networking is great if you all come from the same upper middle class milieu.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 04:46 AM
1

I’d bet an apprenticeship in refrigeration/cooling, plumbing, etc. would pay off far better for a non-connected ‘pale male’ than college.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 04:43 AM
10

Generally women can’t do much on their own even with MASSIVE government support. If individual men become less available women have to push for more government freebies or peddle their ass some how... eThots.
/r/MGTOW221/05/20 04:36 AM
1

Blaming guns is yet another feminist trick to provide an excuse for not helping men: "Toxic masculinity expressed via gun ownership is the reason. Men need to change that." If guns were the reason we’d see a significant difference in men’s suicide rate between states with differing gun laws. The UK for example would have significantly lower rates than the USA.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 05:46 PM
1

"Presumably"... They could always ask MRAs what their motivations are. If they were at all honest they would.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 07:37 PM
3

They generally kill by proxy or via feminist policy, but Aileen Wuornos killed directly.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 09:50 PM
5

So if we compare USA and Canada suicide rates we should see significantly less suicide among men.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:55 PM
16

Men are not wrong or broken because they are different from women.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:54 PM
14

Ah yes. What a classic approach. When women need help it’s society’s problem and resources must be spent. When men need help they need to fix it themselves. Always the response amounts to ‘do nothing’.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:51 PM
3

I’m anti-feminist mostly because of what the powerful feminists do: the bigoted and discriminatory legislation and policy they enact in government and private organizations. Every social media feminist could be completely honest and fair and I’d still oppose the policies they make.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:09 PM
6

Realistic portrayal of the female work space: 3/4 chat, 1/4 social media.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 02:16 PM
4

Were you a hall monitor in elementary school?
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:55 PM
4

Important to remember this loss only applies to men. The man will have half his property, often including future income, and pensions taken from him and given to the female while she keeps her property, income, and pensions. Some may be so indoctrinated into feminism that they’d assume the woman must give up half too if the man does.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:25 PM
11

Fair to say that a feminist attack on men motivated his actions. He was prevented from getting into engineering school because of a feminist sex discrimination program against men made possible by recent feminist legislation that made discrimination against men legal. He shot some of the women who had been ‘affirmative actioned’ into class at his expense.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 07:08 AM
5

African men are actually under represented among those targeted by police given their level of criminality. BLM’s terrorist murder campaigns should have earned them an official ‘terror group’ label and appropriate counter action.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 02:14 AM
3

Was there really misogyny there or just criticism of someone who happened to be female? It’s okay to criticize a woman and women.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 06:17 PM
3

Zardoz! Sean Connery in a leather mankini & matching bandoliers, AK-47s, flying skulls. What more could anyone want in a film?
/r/MensRights14/05/20 06:12 PM
1

Feminists have conflated rape culture with rape. People, men and females, get raped. There is no reason to assume western culture supports, encourages, and defends rape of women. In fact you’d have to invert reality to think men support rape.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 02:39 PM
2

It’s feminists who take away men’s rights so it’s understandable that people might want to discuss feminist action. But you’re probably right if you think we’ll get more accomplished pushing specific policies rather than explicitly opposing feminists. Harder for people to call MRAs all those nasty names that shut down conversation if MRAs are asking for specific, obviously fair policy changes.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 11:40 AM
1

Look at feminist policy and legislation. That shows in precise terms what they want: more privilege for females and more discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 10:38 AM
24

She claims to be ‘sick and tired of the pressures put on women to be responsible for contraception’ but if her myriad contraceptive options were taken away she’d complain about her lack of control. And whenever it looks as if men might get an additional option feminists object because they don’t want men to have more control over their own reproduction.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 04:13 PM
4

It’s a shame these lists of men’s issues seem to include only things that have commonly accepted explanations that blame men and always ignore the fundamental rights issue of sex discrimination being legal against men.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 02:50 PM
0

Hard to measure who gets more but the important thing is that females receive positive discrimination, discrimination in their favour while men suffer discrimination against them.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 08:20 PM
1

Disagreement with or criticism of females isn’t hatred.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 06:21 PM
19

But feminists do attack men’s rights and that harms individual men. When feminists in my country legalized sex discrimination against men they didn’t target any specific men but they harmed many specific men. They don’t have to direct an attack at me in particular for me to be harmed.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 05:49 PM
1

Used to listen to his podcast. It was good but he gradually became routinely racist.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 06:07 PM
2

very common male comment In reality it’s a comment commonly attributed to men by feminist propagandists.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 12:47 PM
0

Conscription is better than a ‘volunteer’ military since that tends to be a ‘poverty draft’ and makes it easier to get into needless, profit driven wars. Conscription should include men and females, have sex segregated units, equal numbers of males & females in combat and non combat roles, and random assignment of male/female units to any given task.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 01:43 AM
1

They focus-grouped ‘The Future is White’ first but it didn’t take off.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 06:28 PM
27

And Biden has now vowed to restore the kangaroo courts when elected. He sure doesn’t like other men to get fair treatment.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 02:31 AM
8

Of course they want men to keep doing the dirty, debilitating, and dangerous jobs, they just want the females comfy in the office to get as much pay.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 12:27 AM
3

What could he do without being at least fired and likely incarcerated? Men cannot use physical force against females anywhere even in defense without punishment.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:03 PM
7

It’s already essentially legal through lack of enforcement.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 04:51 PM
2

Sexism = sexism + Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 04:12 PM
0

The actual sexism is the sexual discrimination against men that has created the present state in which most physicians are female. The feminists describes a fantasy scenario and pretends people display an outdated understanding of the demographics of the medical profession while ignoring real world sex discrimination. Typical feminist.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:20 PM
-5

| I am doing my Masters So no skills but the potential to perhaps acquire them.
/r/MGTOW02/05/20 01:24 PM
7

The day powerful feminists advocate allocating resources to helping resolve men’s issues rather than simply blaming men and instructing them to ‘be more like women’ is the day I’ll believe they are at all concerned. Until then I’ll see the feminist response for what it is: more hatred. Men are actually dying and feminists dismiss it as them being broken women. It’s great that men are different from women and encouraging them to change that is akin to asking Africans to bleach their skin; the mos…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:33 PM
14

None of that matters. The views of the powerful feminists who make laws and policies that rule our lives are all that matter.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:23 PM
9

The problem is your starting point is simply wrong. Men are not suffering from gender roles but from discrimination based on the twisted lies of a powerful hate movement: feminism. Discrimination against men is real, powerful, and deliberately enacted by feminists in order to harm men and benefit females.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:20 PM
8

Feminists (the powerful ones) don’t misunderstand the term. They invented it as a deliberate smear.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:16 PM
5

Discriminatory laws and policies in government and other organizations are what’s hurting men. For example it is legal to sexually discriminate against men but not women and so most western governments and many other organizations do so whenever they chose to. That’s real harm to real people’s lives directly due to feminist law and policy.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:03 PM
2

The rigid gender roles problem was mostly driven by biology and was rectified with the creation of effective oral contraceptives and attendant social change decades ago.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:00 PM
6

There’s a phrase used to describe minimizing the badness of some actor’s behaviour by acknowledging a far less serious action: "Praising with faint damns". Obviously a play on the better known "damning with faint praise". It applies here because you are minimizing the negativity of feminist actions by equating them to MRA actions. That’s simply wrong because feminists are infinitely more harmful than MRAs. MRAs are powerless and ask for nothing but freedom from sex discrimination. Feminists are …
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:44 PM
8

Only the powerful policy making feminists matter and there are no MRA equivalents to those. What does it matter if some teenage YouTuber feminist believes the lies of big feminism and thinks it’s all about equality and saving women from oppression when power feminists make discriminatory laws and policies in government and industry?
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:28 PM
5

"I don't know why after 27 years all of this gets raised..." Scott Adams has suggested this sentence serves as a confession because the word ‘this’ recognizes a real event.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 02:48 PM
17

"... we’re paying the price for that." Their ability to claim victim status is unparalleled.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 06:54 AM
4

I tell them we’d still be tree-dwelling shrew like creatures without men. And that if men vanished tomorrow civilisation will collapse in weeks. And I point out how little women are contributing in science, technology, and art, especially in terms of innovation, despite decades of discrimination in their favor.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 02:40 AM
19

Touch? Biden is accused of digital penetration, rape in many jurisdictions. Rape used to be a capital crime.
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 09:38 PM
46

The constitution of my country gives women more rights than men and I expect that situation generally applies in western nations. Seems like oppression. Typical definition: "the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner."
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:42 PM
8

If she’s sleeping with anyone who mis-sets their alarm clock every night she’s got more problems than ‘theft of sleep’. And she really ought to do something to fix her problem getting to sleep. There should not be a nightly process including: "... Re-run conversations, work through anxieties, massage your guilt glands". Take a meditation or self-hypnosis course and learn how to turn that off.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:02 PM
1

What’s the opposition? Anything that promotes heterosexual dating/mating I suppose and that includes a huge amount.
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 02:45 PM
5

Given that there is a powerful hate group that indoctrinates women to hate men her political affiliations should have been investigated. The jury should have been told if she was a trained feminist.
/r/MGTOW29/04/20 03:17 PM
10

Actually more white men’s ancestors fought to free slaves than ever owned them. Slavery (of the period you referenced) was started by Africans & Arabs, joined by Europeans for a time, then ended by the British & Americans. Of course slavery goes on today in Africa, the Middle East, etc.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 12:10 PM
63

Women’s basic life strategy is that of spoilt child: cry for whatever you want whenever you want it.
/r/MGTOW29/04/20 11:55 AM
4

They imply meritocracy is improperly implemented but rather than suggest fixing the implementation suggest abandoning it in favour of sex & race discrimination. Yet they still insist opposition to discrimination is their primary motivation.
/r/MGTOW29/04/20 09:42 AM
1

Weinstein got a 23 year prison sentence didn’t he? That’s hardly an example of a man getting away with something.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 04:01 AM
1

Nazi doctors found they could make forced experimental subjects orgasm by inserting a wooden device in their rectum to stimulate the prostate. Ok if that’s done to you? It’s giving you an orgasm right?
/r/MensRights28/04/20 01:01 AM
1

Briefly name a woman? Poorly thought out request. Is it possible to name anyone in a way that isn’t brief?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 09:52 PM
2

They can’t win if they don’t cheat.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:44 PM
5

‘His dad was even my sugar-daddy’ Doesn’t that mean she’s a prostitute?
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 08:08 AM
1

Zinc oxide at work.
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 08:01 AM
9

Now men have to wait in line just like the women and women wait half as long because the cost of female inefficiency in bathroom use is being shared by men.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:21 AM
9

Gender neutral bathrooms means men now have to wait in line because women are inefficient users of toilet facilities.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:14 AM
3

Why should men have to wait due to female inefficiency?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:13 AM
5

Problem with that is it transfers the cost of female inefficiency onto men. Men use washrooms without wasting time primping and gossiping and so there’s no waiting in line to use them. With unisex toilets men have to wait while women waste time.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:11 AM
10

In a country where the highest law of the land, the constitution, permits sexual discrimination against men but not women this would be no surprise.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 12:20 PM
1

Sadly nurses have always been attacked. They often work with demented or drug crazed patients and are assaulted daily.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 04:25 PM
1

The UK NHS found that female doctors worked only half as much as men over the course of a career. They complain about a shortage of physicians they could fix by training fewer females.
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 01:20 PM
16

Creepy how he’s trying to find out where she lives...
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 07:26 PM
3

Women have complete control over whether or not they have children. They should be at least partly responsible for their decisions. They’re up to it I’m sure.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 05:59 PM
9

Do some research and you will quickly see that feminists actively oppose any and all efforts of men’s groups to address specific issues. Typically they do so with smear campaigns, false accusations, and bomb threats. Obviously there is no possibility of men productivity working with feminist hate groups.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:00 AM
7

Aren’t most gun crimes committed with illegally possessed firearms? So we can ban gun laws and solve the problem.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:09 PM
1

Do you mean sex? You must.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 04:22 PM
12

Their efforts to minimize, to dismiss the problem says it all.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 03:54 AM
3

"I have to return some video tapes." - is a classic.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 03:21 AM
30

Letting them get away with this stuff is how we’ve got where are today with men’s education faltering, more and more overt discrimination and hatred.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:14 PM
2

Men being ‘unable to open up about feelings’ is a feminist response to the fact that women are far more emotional than men. Rather than considering that women might benefit from being less governed by their emotions they insist that men are broken and in need of feminisization. Men are different than women and that’s fantastic.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 07:24 PM
3

You’ve bought into feminist hate. Men are not broken women. They don’t need to be changed to be made more like females.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 07:19 PM
17

Certainly more good fathers separated from their kids than bad. That’s the real default outcome of divorce.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 04:34 PM
1

Everywhere else it’s perfectly acceptable to wrongly bash men. Surely the world can tolerate one or two places where mostly valid criticism of females is permitted?
/r/MGTOW221/04/20 03:29 PM
3

Feminism is infinitely worse since they have immense real world power in service of their sexist hatred. Feminism controls government & corporate policy throughout the west and consistently acts to denigrate and discriminate against men.
/r/MGTOW221/04/20 03:18 PM
8

They sure do love telling other people what they can and can’t say.
/r/MGTOW21/04/20 10:36 AM
5

Pretty sure they all have legal discrimination against men. Quotas for female politicians, board members, extra scholarships, etc.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:15 AM
2

Her driver/assistant was found to be a Chinese intelligence officer. Or was that Feinstein?
/r/MGTOW19/04/20 07:19 PM
3

Apparently those refrigerators cost about $20, 000. She thought the video would show ordinary people that she’s one of them.
/r/MGTOW19/04/20 07:18 PM
2

The right to be free of sex discrimination was taken from men in my country in 1982. The highest law of the land, the Constitution, still recognizes the right of females to be free from sex discrimination but denies that right to men.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:02 PM
3

Pretty unsubtle to pretend men’s rights are ‘under attack’ when they are long lost. ‘Under attack’ implies the rights still exist but in my country men lost the right to be free of sex discrimination in 1982. I want that right back. Women had that right prior to 1982 and retained it afterward.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:59 PM
1

If it were any other group this extra vulnerability would result in enhanced treatment.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 02:22 PM
0

USA data shows Africans are more likely to die from the Chinese virus... would the UK dare discriminate against them?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 02:16 PM
4

That’s like asking Jews in Poland in 1939+ ‘what rights are under attack’. In other words (for this remedial student): the rights are decades gone now.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 02:55 AM
3

They may just want to get you back on the rotation.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:30 AM
3

It took 30 years of feminist action to generate the current disparity. It’s not due to men being less intelligent. It was engineered.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 12:28 AM
1

No breaks for you. If you stabbed an actual rapist you’d do time.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 09:23 PM
3

The worst part is feminists have managed to offload restroom waiting time imposed by gossiping females on to men via the ‘gender-free restroom’ craze. Now everyone has to wait ‘equally’ to use the restroom even though the delays are all due to female primping & gossip.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:38 PM
19

You need to look at what feminists do rather than what they say. So for example feminists create policy that sexually discriminates against men in all areas while saying they are opposed to sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:17 PM
1

And immigration policy in many western nations is driving the cultural genocide of Europeans. No city should be transformed by government policy from 98% one ethnicity to 30% that ethnicity.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 06:39 PM
3

She needs that messy, broken definition entirely because sexism against men exists. The wouldn’t need to try to excuse the behaviour if they weren’t doing it would they?
/r/MensRights16/04/20 06:31 PM
2

Unless it’s suicide or workplace death or street violence or murder or industrial disease. In those cases the Vulcan proverb doesn’t apply for some reason.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 05:26 PM
1

You’re giving away something very ugly about yourself it seems.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 03:16 PM
2

All females are potential rapists at least as much as are all men. Women know they can almost certainly get away with rape whereas men know they can be punished for a false accusation.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 03:03 PM
5

But it is favoring women. She’s only saying that to protect the cheap but powerful ‘me too’ weapon so she and other women can continue to use it. False sex crime allegations are now a standard tool for her party.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:35 AM
10

Sadly that’s not what’s actually happening. More and more informal processes are being used to condemn mean without due process. Even in criminal courts rules of evidence are being changed to deprive the accused of the safeguards protecting their rights in all other cases.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:32 AM
4

She wasn’t raped; the court decided that. She’s the criminal here.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 11:16 PM
0

The courts do know. They did their job.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 11:11 PM
13

Imagine what the difference would calculated over productivity & quality of work? The females work so many fewer hours over a career and spend so much more work time in unproductive chitchat, gossip, and plotting that they must be paid 200-300% more.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 03:37 AM
5

Yes. Never going back to the plantation. I’ve had all the abuse I want.
/r/MGTOW15/04/20 12:31 AM
2

Women are also far more used to being taken care of by others or the state so have no fear of shutting down the productive economy. They really don’t understand the împlications of their actions but they know whatever happens they will be protected and provided for.
/r/MGTOW14/04/20 06:36 PM
3

BTW there are a couple of pieces of feminist propaganda in your posting: historically women did work but there was a period of a few decades where it was fashionable for middle class white women to live work free. it varies from place to place but generally nobody had the vote, then landowners had the vote, then landowners and all men had the vote, then all had the vote. Feminists need to be fact-checked ever time they say anything.
/r/MGTOW14/04/20 07:54 AM
1

She only talks about the honest bit in detail which is deceptive. Honesty is good. Bitchiness is bad.
/r/MGTOW13/04/20 09:33 PM
24

That’s why the females call it a ‘starter marriage’.
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 03:38 AM
3

What does seem hate-filled is making sneering, slur-ridden posts in a community you know doesn’t want your kind of input.
/r/MGTOW211/04/20 03:19 AM
10

I can never remember if she’s the feminist who celebrated the high suicide rate for men even after driving her own to suicide with her hatred & abuse.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 09:42 PM
10

Rape trials should be like for any other crime. The problem is feminists keep introducing restrictions on the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 09:29 PM
7

Didn’t she cut his finger off? Aggravated assault can get you 15 years prison where I live.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 07:36 PM
1

Shows you just how much better the female publications are.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 02:31 PM
3

Bit scary isn’t it? Bit sociopathic.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 05:12 PM
6

There’s absolutely no reason for feminists to pay any attention to circumcision of men other than their desire to harm men.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:45 PM
2

How about medical records? Record of a hospital visit with a missing finger would go along way to prove the tape isn’t just actors rehearsing.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:06 PM
79

She’s the one crying that makes him the guilty party.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:26 PM
12

It’s a feminist term. Using it supports feminist hate.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 09:46 PM
10

I just want the same rights every female has and an end to sex discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:03 AM
13

The price of oil is always relevant in Alberta for men’s unemployment. Demand for oil is way down because of the Chinese virus.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 06:36 PM
13

Always surprised people fall for the ‘women are superior’ claim. One look at the world and it’s immediately apparent that almost every great thing is done by men. Even after decades of heavy handed discrimination in their favor women aren’t achieving greatness. Patents, Nobel prizes, any unrigged award... it’s almost entirely men.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 02:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter