TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Panzerdrek Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by Panzerdrek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Contextless screencap without the article. Not sus at all.
/r/PussyPass16/08/20 04:44 AM
-16

She didn't commit an additional crime. She was charged with an additional crime in a different jurisdiction with different laws, different prosecutors and different defense attorneys. And in the end approximately the same act got approximately the same result despite all these very real technical distinctions. You are just looking for what you want to see.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/20 02:28 AM
-27

That's the same result dude. The defense and prosecution just used different strategies.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/20 01:20 AM
2

It's funny how often the same people that claim to be "rigorous, objective, fair minded thinkers" spread around such clear examples of poor reasoning.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:00 PM
0

The entire post is just an example of the fallacy of relative privation. What that woman is doing is important and clearly is having a very positive impact on the world, but doesn't justify other bad acts simply because they are not "as bad." It's not substantially different from saying "this homicide detective has locked up 35 murderers. This is real police work. Not arresting people for petty theft, but actually doing something to benefit the community." It's an idiotic premise that ignores th…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:59 PM
1

I know, i was just further clarifying my position since you said I can agree that they are allowed to have and voice whatever views they want as long as they aren't doing so to directly incite violence. As this suggested you weren't entirely sure where I stood on that issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:49 AM
1

I absolutely do not mean violent mobs. Violent mobs need to be policed, full stop. It's a rare circumstance indeed where violence is the moral course of action. This is not one of those occasions.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:36 AM
1

We should also probably be concerned that he is getting in first fights with people weighing like 70 pounds less than him too. And maybe not confuse the right to free speech with the right to punch people. That goes for everyone involved. Lastly, right to free speech goes both ways. That means yeah, the right to yell at idiot people espousing idiot views in public. Ideally none of these people would go out in public saying much of anything because they would value their rights enough to try and …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:09 AM
3

I've noticed a similar trend in the right, except it's just broadly "hurr durr liberal" without any effort to even distinguish between idiot liberals and the larger moderate base. For whatever reason it seems especially prevalent on The Atlantic message boards.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:01 AM
8

Sort of, if you mean classical liberals.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:59 AM
2

Can we just agree they are both horrible and that we as a society should start admiring moderate, reasonable people across the political aisles again instead of demonizing "liberals" and "conservatives" again? Like isolate the crazy actual socialists and actual white nationalists and discouraging people that excuse them and defend them for their crazy views that should have been put to bed 80 years ago,? I don't know about anyone else, but I'd rather not tribe the 1930's again. I think history m…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:58 AM
2

But fortunately he isn't allowed to pull guns on people for being Arab. He goes to prison for that, like anyone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 07:53 AM
1

Universities have had a sort of quai-guardianship role practically since they existed in the U.S. This gives them significant authority over the students at the university.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:43 PM
2

I assume he got his law degree from Costco.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:50 AM
1

30 years in prison is qualitatively different than death. Trying to inflict 30 years of prison on someone is different than trying to inflict death upon them. Trying to do either is reasonably worthy of punishment, but because each crime is different, the punishments ought to be different. Further, trying to inflict 30 years in prison and trying to murder someone is arguably different than actually doing either of those things, depending upon your view of the law of attempts. In the states, the …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 08:40 PM
1

We punish crimes based on their consequences. The consequences of accusing someone of murder are not the same as the consequences of a murder. Therefore the punishment for the accusation of murder should not be the same as for murder. The punishment should fit the crime, not some arbitrary thing related to the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 07:24 PM
1

Eminent domain and adverse possession have nothing to do with speculating on land. There is (almost, depending on where you are) nothing to stop you from going out, finding an empty piece of land you think will be worth more in the future, buying it, then selling it later. Eminent domain and adverse possession was specifically developed as a policy in the US to discourage exactly that practice. As the west was being colonized by the US, much of the land was actually owned by European land specul…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:52 AM
7

Note that there is a friction/conflict/tension between what we can demonstrate to be ethically "just" and the core ideas behind capitalism Actually, capitalistic economics has recognized the problem of non-productive usage of land as being economically inefficient, and consequently the legal system has adopted various rules to discourage exactly that sort of behavior, such as adverse possession and eminent domain. Compare that with many social democracies, or outright socialist countries, where …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:31 AM
3

In the case of land, there are actually all sorts of rules that come in to play if you just buy land to sit on it unproductively, such as adverse possession and eminent domain. Legally at least there is a strong presumption against those that use land in that way, and it is based on the principle that we should encourage the productive use of resources.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter