TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PapaBearDubh Archive

View 1 post and 41 comments by PapaBearDubh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

PapaBearDubh/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

For those using Linux; The PepperFlash plugin used in Chrome/Chromium has issues with the live365 media player. I had better luck using Firefox with the last released official Flash plugin.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:42 PM
3

It's "fair" in the sense that child support is evidently used against both genders, but I don't fair is the same as right. 16k / mo. isn't support, it's punishment.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:23 PM
36

It's a subtle thing, but a pet peeve of mine; did you notice how quickly the article changed the verb from "rape" to "had sex"? Casually softening the words.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:11 PM
2

I'm not suggesting denying help to anyone, but specialization of the center (from what I understand, and I very well could be wrong) could help. (e.g. If someone was paranoid and truly thought that all white people were out to hurt him, having non-white doctors might be a viable first step until the patient was past the paranoia. Yes, I consider distrust of all men/women to be a symptom of the trauma that should be helped with therapy.)
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:23 AM
23

This is why it's important that you have specific shelters for men. Part of the healing process after abuse is learning to feel safe again, so even though generalizing by gender is an imposition, it's more important that the victim has a chance to get better. (i.e. A woman's shelter, at best, will be minimally acceptable for male victims.)
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:37 PM
12

First, a pedantic correction: The title should be "Facing up to atheism's MRA problem." Sorry, that shit bothers me endlessly. Next, even if the survey were true, what would his argument then be? "People with critical thinking skills tend to eschew both gods and feminism"? Yeah... and?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:51 AM
3

This seems more TRP than MRM.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:31 AM
2

You guys are a pro-swimmers group, why do you talk about drowning so much? It seems like you should focus on swimming.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:00 AM
2

I'd be a fan of this. Bear with me. It'd a good thing. Schools that recognize the myth of "rape culture" and that didn't conform to the outrageous and anti-male demands from Feminists would score low. A low score would suggest that the specific school provides suitable climate for male students. A sanity barometer, if you will.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:36 PM
2

Of course not, although statistically it does happen to black men more often. As /u/AlphaWookie has pointed out this is from "The Final Call" the Nation of Islam's paper. As they're explicitly an anti-white religious group, you can expect them not to be strongly concerned with white men.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:30 PM
1

I see what you're saying, but I think you're coming at me from a very odd angle. I specifically put in the "bare facts" that communication is often non-verbal. Doing something is a yes. When I say "The concept of enthusiastic is that women can say 'yes', think 'no', and have it not qualify as consent." I am specifically referring to non-verbal communication. For example: If you eat food that is given to you, without being threatened or forced, and then claim that you were force-fed because you d…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:35 AM
0

edit; The concept of enthusiastic is that women can say "yes" actively participate, think "no", and have it not qualify as consent. Note that we're not talking about any actual threat or coercion. That already qualifies as rape, legally. But a theoretical undefined emotional state where a women would think no, but be unable or unwilling to say no. This is insulting to women, as it assigns them passive and malleable nature, unable to stand up and speak their desires -- even when the alternative w…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:59 AM
2

I understand this, and I was also very hesitant to post the article for that reason. In the end I decided to post it because the article in-and-of-itself makes good points, and shows a positive view of males in the worst positions making good on being fathers. I do want to vocally distance myself from the NOI and any connotations that might be implied by linking their article here.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:36 AM
12

You need to file a police report. Yesterday. If you want this to be treated as a rape case by your fiance, then you need to treat it like one. IANAL, but you should talk to a lawyer now.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:03 PM
5

I clearly remember signs saying "don't leave valuables in your car" and tips about keeping a mugging stash separate from your wallet. So, I think you're adding the "in a 5 star hotel or well to do after dark in well to do areas" phrasing to cherry-pick a situation, because we often warn people to prepare for mugging or robbery - even in rich areas.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:55 AM
4

Surely taking preventative measure against crime doesn't speak to how accepted the crime is. We don't treat any other crime this way.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:38 AM
1

Some of the article seemed good to me. The male style learning, letting the children express themselves as male without calling it a behavior issue. Other parts really bothered me, the line "...if young men pose a danger to themselves and others..." for example. Contextualizing men as a problem to be fixed seemed to be an overtone with literally defining what it was to be a man. It leaves me wondering who does this defining. From nonsense terms like "rape-fuelled video games", to equating rape j…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:25 AM
5

I don't see the reported sympathy in the article.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:09 AM
1

I hear that; but I keep getting the feeling that "Don't be rude" would've made for such a better choice of words - the whole "smile" thing seems misleading if it's all about how it's said.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:38 AM
0

I feel that I truly don't understand where you're coming from here, and I want to. So I read this comment chain to my wife, asking her to listen and give me any insight that she could. She and I tend to agree a lot, so I specifically asked her to assume that you were correct here and that I was missing something. She said that she could not recall ever being told to smile while in public, although she has been subject to cat-calls. Her view - paraphrased - is that what people say is only as vali…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:10 AM
1

"The man on the street who told me that I'd be prettier if I smiled was not offering a compliment..." And you know this because you're psychic?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:31 PM
0

So your issue was that he was rude to you, not the fact that he said to smile. Perhaps "don't be rude" posters would be a better (although equally useless) campaign.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:24 PM
0

I still don't consider some of the things you've listed to be issues. You're qualifying compliments as harassment. You should really mention the implied context that it's only considered an imposition when the male is being rejected. Not to mention that sexually objectifying and meriting people ( http://nycsubwayguys.tumblr.com ) is also a selectively applied restriction. (We all do it, by the way. It's called libido, and it's a healthy part of sexual interaction.) I'm not suggesting that you sh…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:09 PM
1

STDH.txt
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:25 PM
1

This doesn't really make me happy. Conscription is horrid. I'd rather nobody be forced into the armed forces. Now it might be a shared misery. Ew.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:10 AM
8

I don't understand how someone who openly discards the rape of children is published in a newspaper. I just can't wrap my head around it. Makes me sick to my stomach.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:13 AM
1

Similar.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:54 AM
2

Well, that's complicated. It isn't a men's issue inherently, but how it's applied often makes it an issue. Kevin Federline isn't a typical example of how men are treated in divorce court, so using him as an example is somewhat cherry-picking. edit: This is a good example of malicious use of alimony just recently posted here in /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:48 AM
1

I hope it is a joke. With that said, it's not the only example of anti-male rhetoric specific to the Nordic states. Iceland's ban on porn to "protect women" for example.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:24 PM
14

"It's patriarchy that allows this for men to happen." That's victim blaming. Please don't do that. "Men are very welcome to stand up for their own course." No, we're faced with silencing and opposition even with the most basic of self-preservation. (e.g. Men's shelters.) edit; Recognizing the misuse of statistics and outright lying within feminism is a good first step though.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:22 PM
1

That's a bit of a can o' worms. Do you suppose that a call to the people behind these posters would be productive? I don't believe it would be effective. We're left with two actual choices. Ignoring it, or replying to it. I don't personally think that being told to smile is a big deal, so when I suggest that we post male-focused mirrors of the original poster my intent is to mock them. Perhaps the OP shares this view. Or perhaps he's just trying to suggest a viable change. (i.e. If you're going …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:18 PM
1

Not even a full 24 hours have passed since we saw a Swedish article about how men shouldn't have the right to vote. So you will have to pardon my skepticism when the editor says that "Calling for 'gender equality' actually does work out pretty well for everyone involved in the Nordic countries." Smells like bullshit to me.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:11 PM
9

If you do read the twitter stream, it's a perfect sample of all the greatest double-speak feminism has to offer.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:03 PM
1

Is telling anyone to smile really a problem?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:57 PM
0

Given the social convention of men asking women out, combined with the lack of male models being paraded around to talk at schools... it might be hard to find a reverse situation. (Ironically, gender-role assignments.) But, the burden wouldn't lie on me to prove that it wasn't because of gender, as the onus lies with the one making the claim. If you want to argue that this is a good example of a double standard you need to evidence the double standard. So... do you have an example of a girl aski…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 06:55 PM
5

The anti-fem idea is a response to the underlying philosophy of the feminist movement, that being the projection of "patriarchy". So, no, the title is accurate and needed. To be anti-sexist you need to be anti-feminist. Full stop. With that said, how you say things is vital. Karen Straughan said it very well in her speech in response to the "Are Men Obsolete?" ordeal. Paraphrasing: "Your goal isn't to change the mind of the feminist you're talking to. You can't change their mind. But if you pres…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:40 AM
6

Hard to comment on speculation, even though I agree with you. This isn't a strong demonstration of those double standards.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:19 AM
19

The school's actions, even if you disagree with them, have nothing to do with gender here. It was about being disruptive, not about being a man.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:05 AM
1

I think it's more of a "Be safe when meeting people from the internet" line, and not an anti-male statement. It certainly didn't offend me. e; Especially because she's talking about not making assumptions about white men who are interested in black women.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:01 PM
38

There's not-so-subtle irony in someone who is explicitly anti-MRA using the argument "See, you're just anti-feminist!" As a structure, they've just dismissed themselves. :cogdis:
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:18 PM
2

/u/wil has always left out the small print that goes along with his rule; "* Unless I think it's justified." His entire career is built on being a dick, comically, and so long as it's socially acceptable enough not to lessen his audience he'll keep doing so.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter